Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL in Insulin-Naïve People with Type 2 Diabetes: the ATOS Study

INTRODUCTION

The clinical benefits of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) have been confirmed in randomised clinical trials (EDITION programme and BRIGHT) and real-world studies in the USA and Western Europe. ATOS evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of Gla-300 in wider geographic regions (Asia, the Middle East, North Africa, Latin America and Eastern Europe).

METHODS

This prospective observational, international study enrolled adults (≥ 18 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) uncontrolled [haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > 7% to ≤ 11%] on one or more oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs (OADs) who had been advised by their treating physician to add Gla-300 to their existing treatment. The primary endpoint was achievement of a pre-defined individualised HbA1c target at month 6.

RESULTS

Of the 4550 participants included, 4422 (51.8% female) were eligible for assessment. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 57.2 ± 10.8 years, duration of diabetes was 10.2 ± 6.2 years and baseline HbA1c was 9.28 ± 1.0%. The proportion of participants reaching their individualised glycaemic target was 25.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 23.8-26.6%] at month 6 and 44.5% (95% CI 42.9-46.1%) at month 12. At months 6 and 12, reductions were observed in HbA1c (-1.50% and -1.87%) and fasting plasma glucose (-3.42 and -3.94 mmol/L). Hypoglycaemia incidence was low, and body weight change was minimal. Adverse events were reported in 283 (6.4%) participants, with 57 (1.3%) experiencing serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting, initiation of Gla-300 in people with T2DM uncontrolled on OADs resulted in improved glycaemic control and low rates of hypoglycaemia with minimal weight change.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT03703869.

Magnitude of Glycemic Improvement in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Basal Insulin: Subgroup Analyses from the MOBILE Study

Objective: To determine if type 2 diabetes patients using basal insulin without prandial insulin with worse glycemic control at baseline would have the greatest benefit from using real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the MOBILE Study, a multicenter trial examining the impact of CGM versus self-monitoring with a blood glucose meter (BGM) in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin without prandial insulin. Participants were divided into subgroups based on baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and baseline time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR). Change in TIR from baseline was calculated within each subgroup. Results: In subgroups based on baseline HbA1c, compared with the BGM group, the CGM group had 14% greater increase in TIR for participants with baseline HbA1c ≥8.5%, 14% greater increase for baseline HbA1c ≥9.0%, 22% greater increase for baseline HbA1c ≥9.5%, and 32% greater increase for baseline HbA1c ≥10.0% (P-value for interaction = 0.27). The time spent with glucose >250 mg/dL was significantly lower with CGM compared with BGM among participants with higher HbA1c values (P for interaction = 0.004). Results in subgroups based on baseline TIR paralleled the results in subgroups based on baseline HbA1c. Conclusion: While the benefit of CGM on TIR among patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin is apparent across the range of baseline glycemic control, the greatest impact of CGM is in those with the worst baseline glycemic control, particularly among those with HbA1c ≥10%. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT03566693.

Efficacy of Dulaglutide in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Different Glycemic Patterns: a Post-hoc Analysis of the Phase 3 AWARD-CHN2 Trial

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the effect of dulaglutide on the relative contributions of fasting glucose (FG) and postprandial glucose (PPG) to overall hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and assessed responses to dulaglutide versus insulin glargine (glargine) in patients with different baseline glycemic patterns.

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 AWARD-CHN2 trial included data from 560 Chinese patients with uncontrolled T2D who received once-weekly dulaglutide (1.5 or 0.75 mg) or once-daily glargine for 26 weeks. The relative contributions of FG and PPG to overall hyperglycemia across different glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) categories were calculated using the area under the curve of 7-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles. Patients were also categorized into four subgroups according to median baseline FG (cutoff 8.9 mmol/L) and PPG (cutoff 12.5 mmol/L): low FG/low PPG, low FG/high PPG, high FG/low PPG and high FG/high PPG. Changes in glycemic parameters and body weight were calculated for patients in each subgroup.

RESULTS

Among patients receiving dulaglutide, higher HbA1c was associated with higher relative contributions of FG and lower relative contributions of PPG to overall hyperglycemia at baseline and week 26 of dulaglutide treatment. After 26 weeks, dulaglutide 1.5 mg led to statistically greater decreases in HbA1c from baseline versus glargine in most subgroups, including the high FG subgroups, and a numerically greater decrease in HbA1c was observed in the low FG/high PPG subgroup. Across all subgroups, higher proportions of patients achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than with glargine (all P < 0.05). Dulaglutide 1.5 mg showed better control of body weight than glargine in all subgroups (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Dulaglutide reduced HbA1c through reductions in both FG and PPG across HbA1c categories in T2D patients with uncontrolled hyperglycemia. Furthermore, treatment with dulaglutide provided a greater reduction in HbA1c than glargine, regardless of baseline FG and PPG levels.

Simultaneous Versus Sequential Initiation of Lixisenatide and Basal Insulin for Type 2 Diabetes: Subgroup Analysis of a Japanese Post-Marketing Surveillance Study of Lixisenatide (PRANDIAL)

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of lixisenatide and basal insulin (BI) according to timing of treatment initiation, treatment compliance, and number of concomitant daily injections in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

Each substudy analyzed subgroup data from the 3-year post-marketing surveillance PRANDIAL study. Endpoints included glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), postprandial glucose, treatment response (HbA1c < 7.0% at week 24 and 156), and safety. Changes in HbA1c levels were analyzed using paired t tests; between-group comparisons were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA).

RESULTS

Of 2679 participants, 46.5% initiated BI before lixisenatide, 12.0% the same day, 2.7% between 1 and 90 days, and 2.8% at 91 or more days after lixisenatide; 36.0% did not receive BI. Overall, 85.4% of patients were compliant with lixisenatide treatment. The majority of patients (52.4%) received two injections/day (one was lixisenatide). Compared with other subgroups taking BI and lixisenatide, the subgroup starting them simultaneously had a mean change in HbA1c of - 0.69% [8 mmol/mol] (vs + 0.07% [0.8 mmol/mol] to - 0.79% [9 mmol/mol]) and numerically higher treatment response (21.0% vs 8.3-18.7%), but more hypoglycemia (8.1% vs 2.3-2.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese people with T2D achieved better glycemic control by simultaneous as opposed to sequential initiation of lixisenatide and BI.

One-hundred year evolution of prandial insulin preparations: From animal pancreas extracts to rapid-acting analogs

The first insulin preparation injected in humans in 1922 was short-acting, extracted from animal pancreas, contaminated by impurities. Ever since the insulin extracted from animal pancreas has been continuously purified, until an unlimited synthesis of regular human insulin (RHI) became possible in the '80s using the recombinant-DNA (rDNA) technique. The rDNA technique then led to the designer insulins (analogs) in the early '90s. Rapid-acting insulin analogs were developed to accelerate the slow subcutaneous (sc) absorption of RHI, thus lowering the 2-h post-prandial plasma glucose (PP-PG) and risk for late hypoglycemia as comparing with RHI. The first rapid-acting analog was lispro (in 1996), soon followed by aspart and glulisine. Rapid-acting analogs are more convenient than RHI: they improve early PP-PG, and 24-h PG and A1C as long as basal insulin is also optimized; they lower the risk of late PP hypoglycemia and they allow a shorter time-interval between injection and meal. Today rapid-acting analogs are the gold standard prandial insulins. Recently, even faster analogs have become available (faster aspart, ultra-rapid lispro) or are being studied (Biochaperone lispro), making additional gains in lowering PP-PG. Rapid-acting analogs are recommended in all those with type 1 and type 2 diabetes who need prandial insulin replacement.

Use of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Improves Glycemic Control and Other Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated with Less Intensive Therapy

Objective: Use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) has been shown to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who are treated with intensive insulin therapy. However, most T2D patients are denied coverage for rtCGM due to failure to meet payer eligibility requirements: treatment with ≥3 insulin injections (or pump) and history of 4 × /day blood glucose testing. We investigated the relevance of these criteria to successful rtCGM use. Methods: This 6-month, prospective, interventional, single-arm study assessed the clinical effects of use rtCGM in patients with T2D treated with basal insulin only or noninsulin therapy. Primary outcomes were changes in HbA1c, average glucose, glycemic variability (% coefficient of variation), and percent of time in range (%TIR), below range (%TBR) and above range (%TAR). Results: Thirty-eight patients were included in the analysis (10.1% ± 1.8% HbA1c, 54.7 ± 10.2 years, 35.6 ± 6.4 body mass index). At 6 months, we observed reductions in HbA1c (-3.0% ± 1.3%, P < 0.001) and average glucose (-23.6 ± 38.8, P < 0.001). %TIR increased 15.2 ± 22.3, from 57.0 ± 29.9 to 72.2 ± 23.6, P < 0.001, with all patients maintaining %TBR targets (<4% at 70 mg/dL, <1% at <54 mg/dL). No changes in glycemic variability were observed. The greatest improvements in %TIR and %TAR were seen in patients treated with ≤1 medication. Conclusions: rtCGM use was associated with significant glycemic improvements in T2D patients treated with basal insulin only or noninsulin therapy. Given the growing body of evidence supporting rtCGM use in this population, insurance eligibility criteria should be modified to expand rtCGM use by T2D patients treated with less intensive therapies.

Basal weekly insulins: the way of the future!

Basal insulin treatment is indispensable for patients with type 1 diabetes and often required by many with type 2 diabetes. Incremental advances lengthening the duration of action of insulin analogs and reducing pharmacodynamic variability have resulted in truly once-daily, long-acting basal insulin analogs. In the quest for better basal insulins to facilitate improvements in glycemic control and long-term outcomes, the driving need is to remove barriers delaying timely initiation of basal insulin, to maximize treatment adherence and persistence and reduce treatment burden without increasing risk of hypoglycemia. We review the range of investigational once-weekly insulins and their molecular strategies and profiles. Currently, the two most advanced clinical development programs are: (1) basal insulin icodec, an insulin analog acylated with a C20 fatty diacid (icosanedioic acid) side chain (Novo Nordisk) and (2) basal insulin Fc, a fusion protein that combines a single-chain insulin variant with a human immunoglobulin G fragment crystallizable domain (Eli Lilly). Available phase 2 data for these two once-weekly agents show comparable glycemic control to existing once-daily insulin analogs, with no greater risk of hypoglycemia. While phase 3 data are awaited to confirm efficacy and safety, we provide future clinical perspectives on practical considerations for the potential use of once-weekly insulins.

Concomitant iGlarLixi and Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitor Therapy in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: LixiLan-G Trial and Real-World Evidence Results

INTRODUCTION

iGlarLixi, the once-daily fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/ml and lixisenatide, robustly improves glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes irrespective of previous treatment [oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs), basal insulin or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs)]. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are a recommended treatment option for people with type 2 diabetes with cardiovascular disease, kidney disease and/or heart failure because of their cardio- and renoprotective benefits. Herein, we assessed the effects of concomitant iGlarLixi and SGLT2i therapy.

METHODS

We conducted subgroup analyses according to SGLT2i use in: (1) adults with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes on GLP-1 RAs and OADs switching to iGlarLixi in the 26-week LixiLan-G randomised controlled trial (RCT; NCT02787551) and (2) adults switching to or adding iGlarLixi in a 6-month, retrospective real-world evidence (RWE) observational study using data from the US Optum-Humedica electronic medical records database. Changes in HbA_1c and hypoglycaemia prevalence and event rates were assessed.

RESULTS

There were no major differences in baseline characteristics for those who initiated iGlarLixi while already using SGLT2i (n = 346) and those initiating iGlarLixi without concomitant SGLT2i therapy (n = 1285). HbA_1c reductions from baseline to time of assessment and hypoglycaemia prevalence and event rates were similar for iGlarLixi users regardless of SGLT2i therapy.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from an RCT and an RWE analysis supports the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of iGlarLixi when used concomitantly with SGLT2i.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02787551.

Comparison of various basal insulin dose adjustments for inpatients while unable to eat

Background The American Diabetes Association recommends basal insulin or basal plus correctional insulin regimen for non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus unable to eat. There is limited evidence available examining ideal basal insulin dose reductions in this patient population. Aim This study aimed to determine the percent reduction of maintenance basal insulin that would provide the least hypoglycemic incidence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the non-intensive care unit setting. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus prescribed outpatient basal insulin with a minimum unable to eat status of two hours. Patients were divided into four groups; <25%, 25-50%, 51-75%, > 75% of basal insulin administered compared to home dose. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypoglycemia while unable to eat. Secondary endpoints included incidence of hyperglycemia, severe hypoglycemia, median daily blood glucose and hospital length of stay. Results A total of 173 patients were included. The primary outcome of hypoglycemia (5.9% vs. 8.8% vs. 14.3% vs. 12.3%; P = 0.578) was similar in all groups. There were no differences in hyperglycemia (P = 0.0701), severe hypoglycemia (P = 0.578) and median daily blood glucose (P = 0.428). Patients receiving 25-50% of home basal insulin had the longest unable to eat duration (11.5 h; P = 0.026); however, this was not statistically significant when adjusted using the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests. Conclusions No differences were observed in hypoglycemic events for patients unable to eat receiving various basal insulin dose reductions.

Efficacy and safety among second-generation and other basal insulins in adult patients with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

We aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of second-generation basal insulins (glargine U300 and degludec U100) vs. neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) and first-generation basal insulins (glargine U100 and detemir) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) adults.PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar (until January 2021) were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with ≥ 12 weeks of follow-up comparing efficacy (HbA_1c) or safety (hypoglycemia and weight gain) between second-generation basal insulins vs. other basal insulins in T1D adults were included. Bayesian network meta-analyses were used to estimate risk ratio, hazard ratio, and mean difference. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to appraise evidence certainty.Eighteen RCTs (≥ 24 weeks of follow-up) involving 7283 randomized participants were included for main analysis. Moderate to high certainty evidence suggested that second-generation basal insulins showed equivalent HbA_1c reduction compared with NPH and first-generation basal insulins. Compared with second-generation basal insulins, low to high certainty evidence suggested that NPH was associated with a higher risk of patients experiencing severe hypoglycemia; NPH and first-generation basal insulins were associated with a higher rate of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemic events. For the weight gain, glargine U300 was comparable to detemir (low certainty), but degludec U100 was greater than detemir (moderate certainty).In conclusion, second-generation basal insulins maintained equivalent efficacy of glycemic control (moderate to high certainty), with differences in safety (low to high certainty) compared with NPH and first-generation basal insulins during ≥ 24 weeks of follow-up in T1D adults.

Clinical Benefit of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Previously Uncontrolled on Basal or Premixed Insulin in Serbia: A Prospective, Observational, Single-Arm, Multicenter, Real-World Study

INTRODUCTION

Insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) is a novel glargine formulation which shows slower and more prolonged absorption following subcutaneous administration in comparison to insulin glargine 100 U/mL. In this prospective, observational, single-arm, multicenter, real-world study conducted in Serbia, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of Gla-300 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) previously inadequately controlled with different basal or premix insulin therapy regimes.

METHODS

A total of 350 patients with T2DM were enrolled by 27 physicians, from date of the first patient in (12 December 2017) to the date of last patient completed/last patient out (30 October 2018), from both medical centers and general hospitals. Patients' observation and data collection were performed at visit 1 (V1), i.e., the inclusion visit (3-6 months after Gla-300 introduction), including collection of retrospective data from the patients' medical charts at the time of Gla-300 introduction, and at visit 2 (V2) (3-6 months after V1). The primary objective was to assess the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level from day of the Gla-300 initiation to the end of the observational period, while the secondary objectives included other effectiveness, as well as safety and other clinically relevant data.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 350 patients was 63.4 ± 8.4 years and 56.3% were female. The mean duration of diabetes was 13.4 ± 7.4 years, while the mean duration of insulin therapy prior to Gla-300 initiation was 5.3 ± 3.9 years. There was a significant reduction in HbA1c level at each visit compared to the previous visit (8.63 ± 1.52% at baseline prior to Gla-300 initiation, 7.87 ± 1.13% at V1, 7.45 ± 1.05% at V2; p < 0.01 vs. previous visit) accompanied by significant reduction of all hypoglycemic events (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Initiation of Gla-300 therapy significantly improved glycemic control and reduced the risk of hypoglycemia in patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with different basal or premix insulin therapy regimes.

FUNDING

Sanofi Serbia.

Once-Daily Oral Semaglutide Versus Injectable GLP-1 RAs in People with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The relative efficacy and safety of once-daily oral semaglutide vs. injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled on basal insulin were assessed using network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to identify randomised controlled trials of GLP-1 RAs in this population. Data at 26 ± 4 weeks were extracted for efficacy and safety outcomes feasible for the NMA: change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA_1c), weight and blood pressure; HbA_1c target levels (< 7.0% and ≤ 6.5%); composite endpoint; incidence of nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea. Comparators of interest were all licensed doses of dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide and once-weekly injectable semaglutide.

RESULTS

The NMA included seven trials. Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg was associated with significantly greater HbA_1c reductions vs. most comparators (treatment differences: - 0.42 to - 1.32%); differences vs. once-weekly injectable semaglutide (0.5 mg and 1 mg doses) were not statistically significant. Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg was associated with significantly greater weight reductions vs. exenatide 2 mg and lixisenatide 20 μg (- 2.21 and - 2.39 kg respectively); non-statistically significant weight reductions in favour of once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg were observed vs. all other comparators except once-weekly injectable semaglutide 1 mg. Similar trends were observed for the proportion of subjects achieving HbA_1c < 7.0% and ≤ 6.5% and the composite endpoint. Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg was associated with similar odds of experiencing nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea vs. all comparators.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg, as an add-on to basal insulin, is an efficacious treatment for reducing HbA_1c and weight and meeting glycaemic targets at 26 ± 4 weeks. Once-daily oral semaglutide 14 mg also offers the option of an oral treatment with similar or better efficacy and similar tolerability vs. most injectable GLP-1 RAs.

Correlates of analog vs human basal insulin use among individuals with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Given the shift from use of less expensive human to costlier analog insulins for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D), we examine characteristics and glycemic control associated with type of basal insulin use.

METHODS

We analyzed respondents with T2D in six consecutive National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles (2005-2016). Logistic regression models examined associations between demographics, socioeconomic factors, and NHANES cycle with (1) type of basal insulin use and (2) hemoglobin A1c <8.0% and <7.0% according to basal insulin type.

FINDINGS

Basal insulin use increased from 9.6% to 17.2% of respondents with T2D between 2005 and 2016. Among 723 respondents meeting inclusion criteria, the proportion using analog basal insulin rose from 58% to 88%. African American (aOR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24-0.74) and Hispanic (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.96) respondents had lower odds of analog basal insulin use than non-Hispanic White respondents in adjusted and unadjusted models. Older age and having health insurance, but not type of basal insulin use, associated with meeting HbA1c targets.

INTERPRETATION

Non-White NHANES respondents were less likely to use analog basal insulin than White respondents. Increased analog basal insulin use between 2005 and 2016 was not associated with improved glycemic control.

All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality Among Insulin-Naïve People With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Insulin Detemir or Glargine: A Cohort Study in the UK

INTRODUCTION

Uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with an increased risk of micro- and macrovascular complications and mortality. The impact of basal insulins on the risks of mortality and cardiovascular mortality in people with T2D has not been thoroughly investigated in real-world settings. The aim of the present real-word study was to investigate differences in mortality among insulin-naïve people with T2D who initiated insulin detemir (detemir) and insulin glargine (glargine).

METHODS

We assessed all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in people with T2D, aged ≥ 40 years and insulin-naïve at treatment initiation. People were identified from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD national database (2004-2019). Database information included prescribed medications, demographic and clinical variables and mortality. Cause of death was obtained from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). For mortality, 24 clinically relevant confounders were considered and adjusted for using Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

The total cohort included 12,847 people with T2D, including 3031 who commenced detemir and 9816 who commenced glargine. Median age was 66.8 years and median diabetes duration was 7.6 years. From the total cohort, 3231 deaths occurred during follow-up and 6897 people were eligible for linkage to the ONS for cardiovascular mortality data (528 cardiovascular deaths). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.86 (0.79; 0.95) for all-cause mortality and 0.83 (0.67; 1.03) for cardiovascular mortality, in favour of detemir versus glargine. These associations were more pronounced among people with obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m²), with HRs (95% CI) of 0.79 (0.69; 0.91) and 0.69 (0.50; 0.96) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world observational study, there was an association between all-cause mortality and basal insulin choice in insulin-naïve people with T2D; the mortality risk was lower with detemir versus glargine after adjustment for potential confounders.

Target attainment in insulin-naive patients at high risk for hypoglycemia: Results from ACHIEVE Control

AIMS

To better understand outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes at high risk of hypoglycemia, we conducted post hoc analyses in subgroups of participants from the real-world ACHIEVE Control study (NCT02451137) with ≥1 hypoglycemia risk factor.

METHODS

Insulin-naive adults with type 2 diabetes and A1c ≥8% were randomized 1:1 to insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) or standard-of-care basal insulin (SOC-BI). Participants had documented history of ≥1 risk factors for hypoglycemia: chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, dementia or blindness, age ≥65 years, or history of hypoglycemia. Outcomes included individualized A1c target attainment without documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (blood glucose [BG] ≤3.9 mmol/L or <3.0 mmol/L) or severe hypoglycemia, A1c target attainment, and absence of documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Within subgroups, odds ratios generally showed trends favoring Gla-300 versus SOC-BI, particularly for hypoglycemia avoidance in participants ≥65 years of age (BG ≤3.9 mmol/L; odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.03) and those with chronic kidney disease (BG ≤3.9 mmol/L; odds ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-4.12). Results were consistent with the overall population.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest potential benefit of Gla-300 versus SOC-BI for avoiding hypoglycemia in participants with ≥1 hypoglycemia risk factor.

Basal insulin ameliorates post-breakfast hyperglycemia via suppression of post-breakfast proinsulin/C-peptide ratio and fasting serum free fatty acid levels in patients with type 2 diabetes

Background

In general, basal insulin targets fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels, and prandial insulin targets postprandial glucose (PPG) levels. However, the effects of basal insulin on PPG levels are controversial. We investigated the effect of basal insulin on postprandial hyperglycemia using a test meal at breakfast as well as compared differences between degludec and glargine.

Methods

A total of 20 participants with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to degludec (n = 10) or glargine (n = 10). We initiated basal-bolus insulin therapy and titrated only basal insulin until FPG was < 6.1 mmol/L. We evaluated changes in post-breakfast glucose levels and changes in clinical parameters such as serum C-peptide (CPR), proinsulin (PI), and free fatty acids (FFA) levels between the pre- and post-titration periods. Differences between degludec and glargine in the post-titration period were also evaluated.

Results

Post-breakfast glucose levels significantly decreased by 46.1% in the post-titration period compared with the pre-titration period (n = 20, p < 0.001). These decreases correlated positively with decreases in the post-breakfast PI/CPR ratio (r = 0.692, p < 0.001) and in fasting FFA levels (r = 0.720, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in post-breakfast glucose levels between degludec and glargine. However, the hypoglycemic rate with degludec was significantly lower than with glargine.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that basal insulin with either degludec or glargine decreases the incidence of post-breakfast hyperglycemia accompanied by decreasing the post-breakfast PI/CPR ratio and fasting FFA levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Basal insulin requirement in patients with type 1 diabetes depends on the age and body mass index

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

To investigate the basal insulin requirement in patients with type 1 diabetes who are on multiple daily injections (MDI) and to assess the patient characteristics that affect the percent of total daily basal insulin dose to the total daily insulin dose (%TBD/TDD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The subjects of this study were 67 inpatients with type 1 diabetes who were served diabetic meals of 25-30 kcal/kg standard body weight during several weeks of hospitalization. The basal insulin requirement was adjusted to keep the blood glucose level from bedtime to before breakfast within a 30 mg/dL difference. The bolus insulin dose before the meal was adjusted to keep the blood glucose level below 140 and 200 mg/dL before and 2 h after each meal, respectively. The total daily insulin dose (TDD), the percent of total daily basal insulin dose (TBD) to TDD (%TBD/TDD), and clinical characteristics were collected.

RESULTS

The median (Q1, Q3) of TDD was 33.0 (26.0, 49.0) units, and the %TBD/TDD was 24.1 ± 9.8%. The %TBD/TDD was positively correlated with the body mass index (BMI) and negatively correlated with the age at the onset and at the examination according to a univariate analysis. However, the %TBD/TDD was dependent on the BMI (β = 0.340, P = 0.004) and the age at examination (β = -0.288, P = 0.012) according to the multiple regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The average %TBD/TDD in patients with type 1 diabetes on MDI was approximately 24% under inpatient conditions. The basal insulin requirement was dependent on the BMI and the age at examination.

A Pragmatic Study of Basal and Mid-Mixture Insulins as Starter Insulins in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Observations From Long-Term, Real-World Experience

INTRODUCTION

According to Chinese guidelines, basal insulin (BI) or premixed insulins are recommended insulin starters following the failure of oral antihyperglycemic medication (OAM) in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This pragmatic study investigated the long-term effectiveness, safety, and cost of add-on BI and mid-mixture insulin analog (MMI) regimens in Chinese patients with T2D.

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, pragmatic study randomized patients 1:1 to receive either BI or MMI with OAMs adjusted according to current standards of care. We evaluated the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline, safety parameters, and antidiabetic medication costs.

RESULTS

Change in HbA1c from baseline showed a statistically greater decrease at week 48 in the MMI group (MMI: - 2.03% [0.06] vs. BI: - 1.82% [0.06]; P < 0.05). Both groups showed decreases in fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) (MMI: - 2.53 [0.14] vs. BI: - 3.19 [0.14]; P < 0.01) and postprandial glucose (mmol/L) (MMI: - 4.35 [0.22] vs. BI: - 4.33 [0.23]). More patients in the BI group showed increases in OAM use, while OAM use decreased in the MMI group. Both groups showed stable glycemic control with a very limited insulin dose change from week 24 to week 48. The incidence of total hypoglycemia was higher in the MMI group (MMI: 124% [30.7] vs. BI: 76% [18.5], P < 0.0001), but no incidence of severe hypoglycemia was reported in either group. Treatment costs, in terms of average daily cost and cost of glycemic control, were higher in the BI group.

CONCLUSION

In long-term real-world use, the MMI and BI groups demonstrated improved glycemic control, with the MMI group showing more significant improvement than the BI group. Hypoglycemia incidence was higher in the MMI group, with no major safety issues through week 48. MMI is likely to provide better price value than BI for the treatment of T2D in Chinese patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03018938.

Quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes after switching to insulin degludec: results from a cross-sectional survey

PURPOSE

Five quality of life (QoL) domains are particularly important to patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using basal insulin-sense of physical well-being, sense of safety regarding hypoglycemia, sense of diabetes as burdensome, feelings of freedom and flexibility, and sleep quality.

METHODS

An online survey assessed these QoL domains in adult patients with T2D in the USA who had switched from a previous basal insulin to insulin degludec (IDeg): modified versions of the World Health Organization (Five) Well-Being Index (WHO-5), Hypoglycemia Attitudes and Behavior Scale (HABS; confidence and anxiety subscales only), and Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS; emotional burden and regimen-related distress subscales only); three items assessing feelings of freedom and flexibility; and one item assessing sleep quality (hours of restful sleep). Patients rated each item for their previous basal insulin and currently while using IDeg. Correlations between sleep quality and the other QoL scales were also assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 152 patients completed the survey and were included in the study sample. Patients reported significantly improved scores while using IDeg on all WHO-5, DDS, HABS, feelings of freedom and flexibility item scores, and total raw/mean subscale scores (P < 0.0001). Patients also reported a significantly greater number of hours of restful sleep [mean (SD) 6.6 (2.0) vs. 5.5 (1.8); P < 0.0001]. Better sleep quality statistically significantly correlated with improved QoL in all other domains assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with IDeg after switching from a previous basal insulin was associated with statistically significant improvements in all QoL domains assessed.

Real-World Evaluation of Glycemic Outcomes and Extra-Glycemic Parameters in Diabetic Patients Treated with the Combined Formulation Degludec-Liraglutide (Ideglira)

INTRODUCTION

Combination therapy with both basal insulin (BI) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) is an effective treatment in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The recent development and release of a fixed-ratio combination of slow-release insulin degludec and the GLP-1RA liraglutide (IDegLira) represents an improvement to this therapy. We have conducted a real-world evidence study in Italian patients with T2DM to evaluate whether the encouraging clinical trial results obtained with IDegLira, which became available in Italy in January 2018, can be confirmed in Italian clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study in patients with T2DM treated with IDegLira from January to December 2018. Prior to the initiation of IDegLira therapy, patients were treated with BI with or without one or more concomitant oral antidiabetic drugs (BOT group) or according to the basal bolus protocol (BI and rapid-acting insulin treatment; BB group).

RESULTS

A total of 244 patients were included in the present study, of whom 186 were in the BOT group and 58 in the BB group. Following the switch to IDegLira therapy, glycemic control improved in both groups, with significant reductions in glycated hemoglobin after 6 and 12 months of treatment in the BOT group and after 6 months of treatment in the BB group. No gain in body weight and body mass index and reductions in fasting plasma glucose and number of concomitant diabetic medications (in BOT patients) were observed. All results obtained during the study were achieved at a moderate dose of IDegLira.

CONCLUSION

The findings from this study show that in a real-world setting, the switch to IDegLira treatment is a valid option for patients who are failing to achieve glycemic control targets and/or struggling with the side effects, such as weight gain and hypoglycemia, of other insulin therapies.

Pluronic® F127-mediated control of insulin release rates from NPH microcrystals and blood glucose depression in STZ-induced diabetic rats

Introduction: Neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin is an intermediate-acting basal insulin with a long history of clinical use, consisting native human insulin. Its rather undesirable action profile, characterized by a peak release within a few hours, followed by insufficient insulin delivery upon a single subcutaneous (s.c.) dose, is well-documented. This may have been caused by the inherent microcrystal structure involving the basic peptide protamine, as well as the presence of tissue enzyme activities that readily act on protamine at the injection site. This issue may be circumvented by utilizing thermosensitive, erodible Pluronic F127 (PF127) to modulate the kinetics of insulin release from NPH over a period of 24 hours in which the hydrogel is completely eroded.

Methods: Previously, we have shown that insulin release rates in vitro from NPH/PF127 formulations (0-25% PF127) markedly reduced the initial insulin release, especially in the presence of enzyme activity that selectively degraded protamine at 1-5 U/mL. Insulin release over the course of 20 hours was better modulated in the presence of increasing PF127 content. In this study, the insulin formulations (0, 20, and 25% PF127) were administered s.c. (4 U/kg) to streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats and blood glucose levels were monitored over 24 hours.

Results: In vivo blood glucose depression profiles in STZ-induced diabetic rats exhibited a similar pattern of control to in vitro data at the single s.c. dose of 4 U/kg, apparently extending the duration of action of NPH over a 24-hour period in the presence of PF127.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the undesirable kinetics of insulin release from NPH is significantly influenced by tissue enzyme activity and that the presence of PF127 provided a timely modulation of insulin release from NPH microcrystals in the STZ-induced diabetic rat model.

Recent Advances in Insulin Therapy

Insulin therapy has advanced remarkably over the past few decades. Ultra-rapid-acting and ultra-long-acting insulin analogs are now commercially available. Many additional insulin formulations are in development. This review outlines recent advances in insulin therapy and novel therapies in development.

The Safety and Efficacy of Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogues in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes at Risk of Hypoglycemia and Use in Other Special Populations: A Narrative Review

Hypoglycemia is a major barrier impeding glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus and creates a substantial burden on the healthcare system. Certain populations that require special attention, such as older adults and individuals with renal impairment, a longer duration of diabetes or those who have experienced prior hypoglycemia, may be at a higher risk of hypoglycemia, particularly with insulin treatment. Second-generation basal insulin analogues (insulin glargine 300 U/mL and degludec) have demonstrated reductions in hypoglycemia compared with insulin glargine 100 U/mL although evidence of this benefit across specific populations is less clear. In this review we summarize the literature with respect to the efficacy and safety data for second-generation basal insulin analogues in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are at risk of hypoglycemia or who require special attention. Randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses and real-world evidence demonstrate that the use of second-generation basal insulin analogues is associated with less hypoglycemia compared with insulin glargine 100 U/mL without compromising glycated hemoglobin control. A reduced risk of hypoglycemia with second-generation basal insulin analogues was evident in older adults and in individuals with obesity, renal impairment, a history of cardiovascular disease or a long duration of insulin use. Further studies are needed in other populations, including those with more severe renal impairment or hepatic dysfunction, the hospitalized population and those with cognitive impairment. Overall, less hypoglycemia associated with second-generation basal insulin analogues may help reduce barriers for insulin use, improve adherence and offset the costs of hypoglycemia-related healthcare resource utilization.

Glycemic Control Following GLP-1 RA or Basal Insulin Initiation in Real-World Practice: A Retrospective, Observational, Longitudinal Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Injectable therapies such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and basal insulin (BI) are well-established agents for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to investigate real-world effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs or BI in adults with T2D poorly controlled on oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study of adults with T2D from the US Optum Humedica® database and UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, who initiated either injectable between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2016. Baseline characteristics, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change, and cumulative percentage reaching HbA1c < 7% in 24 months after initiation were analyzed in four patient cohorts.

RESULTS

In the US and UK databases, respectively, 20,836 and 5508 patients initiated GLP-1 RAs and 60,598 and 5083 initiated BI. Baseline mean HbA1c at initiation ranged between 8.8% and 10.3% across all cohorts. In all cohorts, a decrease of HbA1c occurred 3-6 months after initiation. The cumulative percentage of patients reaching HbA1c < 7% showed the greatest probability in the first 12 months (15-40% of patients across cohorts at 12 months), particularly in the first 6 months after initiation. The probability of reaching glycemic control diminished after the second quarter. The proportion of patients reaching HbA1c < 7% in both GLP-1 RA and BI cohorts at 12 months was < 25% if baseline HbA1c was ≥ 9%.

CONCLUSIONS

For adults with T2D inadequately controlled on OADs, this analysis reveals an unmet clinical need. Initiation of first injectable therapy did not occur until HbA1c was considerably above target, when control is harder to achieve. Results suggest that in individuals with baseline HbA1c ≥ 9.0%, only a minority are likely to achieve an HbA1c < 7% with a GLP-1 RA or BI alone.

Understanding the Clinical Profile of Insulin Degludec, the Latest Basal Insulin Approved for Use in Canada: a Narrative Review

In recent years, the development of basal insulin therapies has focused on insulin analogues that have longer durations of action and more predictable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles than their human insulin-based predecessors, such as neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. Dosed once-daily, such analogues can provide a more stable glucose-lowering action, which translates clinically into a reduced risk of hypoglycemia. Insulin degludec (degludec) became available in Canada in 2017 and is the first basal insulin analogue to have a half-life exceeding the dosing interval. As well as offering the promise of an exceptionally flat PK/PD profile when at steady state, this characteristic means that insulin degludec can be dosed with some flexibility with regard to time of day and that it need not be taken at the same time each day. However, the approximately 25-h half-life also has some implications concerning dose titration. This article provides an up-to-date review of the study data describing the clinical profile of degludec, and aims to give helpful and practical advice to prescribers about its use. While the clinical benefits of degludec are described, it is also acknowledged that further study is required to better understand how its clinical performance compares with that of insulin glargine 300 units/mL.