Current Gaps in the Provision of Safe and Effective Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation and the Potential for Factor XI-Directed Therapeutics

The global prevalence of atrial fibrillation is rapidly increasing, in large part due to the aging of the population. Atrial fibrillation is known to increase the risk of thromboembolic stroke by 5 times, but it has been evident for decades that well-managed anticoagulation therapy can greatly attenuate this risk. Despite advances in pharmacology (such as the shift from vitamin K antagonists to direct oral anticoagulants) that have increased the safety and convenience of chronic oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation, a preponderance of recent observational data indicates that protection from stroke is poorly achieved on a population basis. This outcomes deficit is multifactorial in origin, stemming from a combination of underprescribing of anticoagulants (often as a result of bleeding concerns by prescribers), limitations of the drugs themselves (drug-drug interactions, bioaccumulation in renal insufficiency, short half-lives that result in lapses in therapeutic effect, etc), and suboptimal patient adherence that results from lack of understanding/education, polypharmacy, fear of bleeding, forgetfulness, and socioeconomic barriers, among other obstacles. Often this adherence is not reported to treating clinicians, further subverting efforts to optimize care. A multidisciplinary, interprofessional panel of clinicians met during the 2023 International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress to discuss these gaps in therapy, how they can be more readily recognized, and the potential for factor XI-directed anticoagulants to improve the safety and efficacy of stroke prevention. A full appreciation of this potential requires a reevaluation of traditional teaching about the "coagulation cascade" and decoupling the processes that result in (physiologic) hemostasis and (pathologic) thrombosis. The panel discussion is summarized and presented here.

Long-term Effect of Thyrotropin-binding Inhibitor Immunoglobulin on Atrial Fibrillation in Euthyroid Patients

OBJECTIVE

Individuals with hyperthyroidism are at an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), but the association between autoantibodies and AF or cardiovascular mortality in individuals who have returned to normal thyroid function remains unclear.

METHODS

The study utilized electronic medical records from National Taiwan University Hospital between 2000 and 2022. Each hyperthyroidism patient had at least 1 thyrotropin-binding inhibiting immunoglobulin (TBII) measurement. The relationship between TBII levels and the risk of AF and cardiovascular mortality was assessed using multivariable Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 14 618 enrolled patients over a 20-year timeframe, 173 individuals developed AF, while 46 experienced cardiovascular mortality. TBII values exceeding 35% were significantly associated with an elevated risk of AF for both the first TBII (hazard ratio {HR} 1.48 [1.05-2.08], P = .027) and mean TBII (HR 1.91 [1.37-2.65], P < .001). Furthermore, after free T4 levels had normalized, a borderline association between first TBII and AF (HR 1.59 [0.99-2.56], P = .056) was observed, while higher mean TBII increased AF (HR 1.78 [1.11-2.85], P = .017). Higher first and mean TBII burden continued to significantly impact the incidence of cardiovascular mortality (HR 6.73 [1.42-31.82], P = .016; 7.87 [1.66-37.20], P = .009). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that elevated TBII levels increased the risk of AF and cardiac mortality (log-rank P = .035 and .027, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In euthyroid individuals following antithyroid treatment, elevated circulating TBII levels and burden are associated with an elevated risk of long-term incident AF and cardiovascular mortality. Further reduction of TBII level below 35% will benefit to clinical outcomes.

Risk of death, thrombotic and hemorrhagic events in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation and systemic autoimmune diseases: an analysis from a global federated dataset

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence showing that systemic autoimmune diseases (SADs) are associated with a high risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the impact of SAD on the clinical course of AF patients is largely unknown.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study within a federated healthcare network (TriNetX). Using ICD codes, AF patients on anticoagulant therapy were categorized according to the presence of SAD (M32: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE); M33: Dermato-polymyositis (DMP); M34: Systemic Sclerosis (SSc); M35: Sjogren syndrome). The primary outcomes were the 5-year risks of (1) all-cause death, (2) thrombotic events (ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism), and (3) bleeding (intracranial (ICH) and gastrointestinal (GI)). Secondary outcomes were each component of the primary outcomes. Cox regression analysis after propensity score matching (PSM) was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI).

RESULTS

We identified 16,098 AF patients with SAD (68.2 ± 13.4 years; 71.0% female) and 828,772 AF controls (70.7 ± 12.9 years, 41.1% females). After PSM, AF patients with SAD were associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR 1.13, 95%CI 1.09-1.71), thrombotic events (HR 1.37, 95%CI 1.32-1.43), and hemorrhagic events (HR 1.41, 95%CI 1.33-1.50) compared to AF controls without SAD. The highest risk of all-cause death and GI bleeding was associated with SSc, while the highest risk of thrombotic events and ICH was associated with SLE.

CONCLUSION

AF patients with SAD are associated with a high risk of all-cause death, thrombotic, and hemorrhagic events. These patients merit careful follow-up and integrated care management to improve their prognosis.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation on chronic hemodialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease on chronic hemodialysis are at risk for thromboembolic and bleeding events. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with VKAs in patients with AF on chronic hemodialysis from inception to February 2023 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Outcomes were reported using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.2.2.

RESULTS

We selected three RCTs including 341 patients, of whom 176 (51.6%) were randomized to DOACs. Follow-up ranged from 174 days to 3.38 years. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.34; 95% CI 0.69-2.60; p = 0.39), all-cause mortality (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.72-1.27; p = 0.77), ischemic/uncertain type of stroke or transient ischemic attack (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.19-1.35; p = 0.17), or major or life-threatening bleeding (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.39-1.25; p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis of three RCTs, no significant difference was observed between DOACs and VKAs in cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, ischemic/uncertain type of stroke or transient ischemic attack, or major or life-threatening bleeding in patients with AF on chronic hemodialysis.

Development and Application of an Attribute-Based Taxonomy on the Benefits of Oral Anticoagulant Switching in Atrial Fibrillation: A Delphi Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often switch between oral anticoagulants (OACs). It can be hard to know why a patient has switched outside of a clinical setting. Medication attribute comparisons can suggest benefits. Consensus on terms and definitions is required for inferring OAC switch benefits. The objectives of the study were to generate consensus on a taxonomy of the potential benefits of OAC switching in patients with AF and apply the taxonomy to real-world data.

METHODS

Nine expert clinicians (seven clinical pharmacists, two cardiologists) with at least 3 years of clinical and research experience in AF participated in a Delphi process. The experts rated and commented on a proposed taxonomy on the potential benefits of OAC switching. After each Delphi round, ratings were analyzed with the RAND Corporation/University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) appropriateness method. Median ratings, disagreement index, and comments were used to modify the taxonomy. The resulting taxonomy from the Delphi process was applied to a cohort of patients with AF who switched OACs in a population-based administrative health dataset from 1996 to 2019 in British Columbia, Canada.

RESULTS

The taxonomy was finalized in two Delphi rounds, reaching consensus on five switch benefit categories: safety, effectiveness, convenience, economic considerations, and drug interactions. Safety benefit (a switch that could lower the risk of adverse drug events) had three subcategories: major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Effectiveness benefit had four subcategories: stroke and systemic embolism (SSE), ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality. Real-world OAC switches revealed that more OAC switches had convenience (72.6%) and drug interaction (63.0%) benefits compared to effectiveness (SSE 22.0%, ischemic stroke 11.1%, MI 3.1%, all-cause mortality 10.1%), safety (major bleeding 24.3%, GI bleeding 10.6%, ICH 48.5%), and economic benefits (12.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Delphi-based taxonomy identified five criteria for the beneficial effects of OAC switching, aiding in characterizing real-world OAC switching.

Oral anticoagulants and cognitive impairment in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review assesses the likelihood of developing dementia and cognitive impairment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) as opposed to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA), which encompassed both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The objective was to assess the impact of NOACs and VKAs on the incidence of dementia in individuals diagnosed with AF.

RESULTS

Out of 1914 studies that were screened, 31 studies were included in the final analysis, which consisted of nine RCTs or their subsequent post-hoc analyses, in addition to 22 observational studies. The meta-analysis shows that NOACs were associated with a decreased probability of developing dementia of any cause [Rate Ratio (RR): 0.88; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI): 0.82-0.94], especially in patients below the age of 75 (RR: 0.78; 95 % CI: 0.73-0.84). Consistent patterns were observed across all forms of dementia and cognitive function decline. The overall evidence indicates notable variability in the outcome with a moderate-to-low degree of certainty. The TSA suggests that the total sample size of the included trials (155,647 patients) was significantly smaller than the required information size of 784,692 patients to discern the true effect of NOAC versus VKA in terms of reducing dementia risk.

CONCLUSION

NOACs may reduce the likelihood of developing dementia in patients with AF, particularly in those under the age of 75. This review highlights the urgent necessity for thorough research to determine the efficacy of NOACs in safeguarding cognitive health.

PrevAleNce and Associated factors of inappropriaTe dosing of direct Oral anticoaguLants In pAtients with Atrial Fibrillation: the ANATOLIA-AF Study

PURPOSE

Inappropriate dosing of direct oral anticoagulants is associated with an increased risk of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, cardiovascular hospitalization, and death in patients with atrial fibrillation. The main goal of the study was to determine the prevalence and associated factors of inappropriate dosing of direct oral anticoagulants in real-life settings.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study that included 2004 patients with atrial fibrillation. The study population was recruited from 41 cardiology outpatient clinics between January and May 2021. The main criteria for inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant dosing were defined according to the recommendations of the European Heart Rhythm Association.

RESULTS

The median age of the study population was 72 years and 58% were women. Nine-hundred and eighty-seven patients were prescribed rivaroxaban, 658 apixaban, 239 edoxaban, and 120 dabigatran. A total of 498 patients (24.9%) did not receive the appropriate dose of direct oral anticoagulants. In a logistic regression model, advanced age, presence of chronic kidney disease and permanent atrial fibrillation, prescription of reduced doses of direct oral anticoagulants or edoxaban treatment, concomitant use of amiodarone treatment, and non-use of statin treatment were significantly associated with potentially inappropriate dosing of direct oral anticoagulants.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that the prevalence of inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant dosing according to the European Heart Rhythm Association recommendations was 24.9% in patients with atrial fibrillation. Several demographic and clinical factors were associated with the inappropriate prescription of direct oral anticoagulants.

Comparison of different direct oral anticoagulant regimens in atrial fibrillation patients with high bleeding risk

BACKGROUND

The optimal dose of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to prevent ischemic stroke (IS) and systemic thromboembolism (STE) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a predisposing bleeding risk remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of different DOAC dosage regimens in AF patients with high bleeding risk but low thrombosis risk.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted with the National Health Insurance claims database in Taiwan to include AF patients aged 20 up to 75 years, under DOAC therapy, with CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1 for males and 2 for females and HAS-BLED score ≥3. Standard-dose regimen was defined as dabigatran 300 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg, apixaban 10 mg, or edoxaban 60 mg per day. Any other lower-dose regimen were defined as the low-dose regimen. The primary outcomes were IS and major bleeding (MB). The secondary outcomes were STE, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

A total of 964 patients were included (52.1% standard-dose regimen). Median HAS-BLED score was 3 [interquartile range 3-3]. Compared with standard-dose group, patients in the low-dose group had a significantly increased risk of IS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 5.13; 95% confidence interval 1.37-19.22) and STE (aHR 3.14 [1.05-9.37]) but similar risk of MB (aHR 0.45 [0.12-1.67]). The risks of other hemorrhage and cardiovascular death were similar between the 2 dose groups.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with a predominant bleeding risk but relatively low thrombosis risk, the low-dose DOAC regimen is not a more appropriate selection than standard-dose regimen.

Comparative effectiveness of factor Xa non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus phenprocoumon in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have largely supplanted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for oral anticoagulation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, data on the real-world effectiveness of NOACs vs. phenprocoumon, a VKA widely used in Germany, are limited. The RELOADED study aimed to compare effectiveness of factor Xa NOACs and phenprocoumon in NVAF in clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients who started on a factor Xa NOAC or phenprocoumon for NVAF during the study period were enrolled from the Institute for Applied Healthcare Research Berlin. Patients were followed from first prescription until the end of exposure or available data. Primary outcomes were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard regression models and included ischemic stroke and systemic embolism for effectiveness, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) for safety. Subgroups of interest were patients with diabetes and patients with renal impairment.

RESULTS

The total study population was 64,920; 36.3% of patients initiated phenprocoumon, 34.4% initiated rivaroxaban, 25.0% apixaban, and 4.4% edoxaban. Treatment with phenprocoumon is associated with a similar risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism as treatment with rivaroxaban or apixaban; while rivaroxaban (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.75) and apixaban (adjusted HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31-0.6) were associated with a lower risk of ICH compared to phenprocoumon in NVAF patients. The use of rivaroxaban and apixaban was associated with a lower risk of developing kidney failure in patients with diabetes or renal impairment in comparison to those treated with phenprocoumon.

CONCLUSION

The factor Xa NOACs rivaroxaban and apixaban demonstrated similar effectiveness and lower rates of ICH compared with phenprocoumon in this study.

Are we missing an opportunity? Prehospital delay in patients with acute ischemic stroke and known atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The follow-up of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) presents an opportunity to alert patients and their families on how to recognize and act in the event of stroke. Our aim was to compare stroke recognition-to-door time and prehospital stroke code activation in patients with known AF (KAF) and AF detected after stroke (AFDAS).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients receiving acute recanalization treatment for acute ischemic stroke between January 2016 and August 2022, with AF as a potential stroke cause. Patients were divided into KAF and AFDAS, and stroke recognition-to-door time and prehospital stroke code activation were compared. In the KAF subgroup, we assessed whether the use of preadmission anticoagulation was associated with the studied prehospital parameters.

RESULTS

We included 438 patients, 290 female (66.2%), mean age 79.3±9.4 years. In total, 238 patients had KAF (54.3%) and 200 (45.7%) had AFDAS. Of those with KAF, 114 (48.1%) were pretreated with anticoagulation. Patients with KAF and AFDAS had no differences in stroke recognition-to-door time (74.0 [55.0-101.0] vs. 78.0 [60.0-112.0] min; p=0.097) or prehospital stroke code activation [148 (64.6%) vs. 128 (65.3%); p=0.965]. In the KAF subgroup, preadmission anticoagulation did not influence stroke recognition-to-door time or mode of hospital admission.

CONCLUSION

Stroke recognition-to-door time and prehospital stroke code activation were similar between patients with known or newly diagnosed AF. Preadmission anticoagulation treatment also did not affect the studied parameters. Our findings highlight a missed opportunity to promote stroke knowledge in patients followed due to AF.

The Impact of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors on Atrial Electromechanical Conduction Time

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, a newer class of oral antidiabetic drugs, on atrial electromechanical delay (EMD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). This is particularly relevant given the significantly higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in diabetic patients compared to the general population. Atrial electromechanical delay is recognized as an important factor influencing the development of atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

This study included 30 type 2 DM patients (53.3% female, mean age 60.07 ± 10.03 years), initiating treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors. The patients were assessed using echocardiography at baseline and again at 6 months, focusing on basic echocardiographic parameters and atrial electromechanical delay times (EMD) measured via tissue Doppler imaging.

RESULTS

No significant changes were observed in intra-atrial EMD times. However, significant reductions were noted in interatrial EMD times, decreasing from 15.13 ± 5.87 ms to 13.20 ± 6.12 ms (P = 0.029). Statistically significant shortening occurred in lateral pulmonary acceleration (PA) times (from 58.73 ± 6.41 ms to 54.37 ± 6.97 ms, P < 0.001), septal PA times (from 50.90 ± 6.02 ms to 48.23 ± 5), and tricuspid PA times (from 43.60 ± 6.28 ms to 41.30 ± 5.60 ms, P = 0.003). Additionally, there was a significant reduction in the E/e' ratio from 8.13 ± 4.0 to 6.50 ± 2.37 (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

SGLT-2 inhibitors might positively influence atrial electromechanical conduction, reducing DM-related functional impairments and the risk of arrhythmias, particularly AF.

Incidence and progression of atrial fibrillation in patients with and without heart failure using mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have emerged as potential therapy to target the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate in atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, there have been inconsistent results on the impact of MRAs on AF.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the effect of MRAs on AF incidence and progression in patients with and without heart failure.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched up to September, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated MRA use and reported AF outcomes. Primary outcome was a composite of new-onset or recurrent AF. Safety outcomes included hyperkalemia and gynecomastia risks. A random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

12 RCTs, comprising 11,419 patients treated with various MRAs were included [5960 (52%) on MRA]. On follow-up (6-39 months), 714 (5.5%) patients developed AF. MRA therapy was associated with a 32% reduction in the risk of new-onset or recurrent AF [OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.51-0.92), I2 = 40%]. On subgroup analysis, the greatest benefit magnitude was demonstrated in reducing AF recurrence [OR 0.50 (95% CI 0.30-0.83)] and among patients with left ventricular dysfunction [OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.40-0.85)]. Gynecomastia, but not hyperkalemia, was associated with MRA use. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that therapy duration was a significant interaction factor driving the effect size (Pinteraction = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

MRA use is associated with a reduction in AF risk, especially AF progression. A prominent effect is seen in patients with heart failure, further augmented by therapy duration. Prospective trials are warranted to evaluate MRA use as upstream therapy for preventing this common arrhythmia.

Efficacy of dapagliflozin in improving arrhythmia-related outcomes after ablation for atrial fibrillation: a retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a widespread type of sustained arrhythmia that poses significant health risks. Catheter ablation is the preferred treatment; however, arrhythmia recurrence remains challenging. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, particularly dapagliflozin (DAPA), have exhibited cardiovascular benefits. However, to date, the influence of these inhibitors on AF post-ablation remains unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed the records of 272 patients who underwent catheter ablation for AF from January 2018 to December 2022. Patients were divided into the control (n = 199) and DAPA (n = 73) groups based on DAPA prescription post-ablation. The primary outcome was total atrial arrhythmia recurrence after a 3-month blanking period.

RESULTS

The mean age was 72.19 ± 5.45 years; 86.8% of the patients were men. At 18 months post-ablation, 36.2% and 9.5% of the patients in the control and DAPA groups, respectively, reported atrial arrhythmia. Multivariate analysis revealed that DAPA use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of arrhythmia recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07-0.32, p < 0.001). After propensity score-matching (PSM) in 65 pairs, arrhythmia recurrence was lower in the DAPA group compared with the control (8.3% versus 30.8%, aHR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06-0.51, p = 0.002). Freedom from total arrhythmia recurrence was significantly higher in the DAPA group compared with the control group in both the overall and PSM population (log-rank test p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

DAPA administration post-ablation was associated with significantly reduced atrial arrhythmia recurrence rates, indicating its potential as an adjunct therapy for enhancing the success of AF ablation.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous beta-blockers in acute atrial fibrillation and flutter is dependent on beta-1 selectivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Intravenous beta-blockers are commonly used to manage patients with acute atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFl), but the choice of specific agent is often not evidence-based.

METHODS

A prospectively-registered systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials (PROSPERO: CRD42020204772) to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous beta-blockers against alternative pharmacological agents.

RESULTS

Twelve trials comparing beta-blockers with diltiazem, digoxin, verapamil, anti-arrhythmic drugs and placebo were included, with variable risk of bias and 1152 participants. With high heterogeneity (I2 = 87%; p < 0.001), there was no difference in the primary outcomes of heart rate reduction (standardised mean difference - 0.65 beats/minute compared to control, 95% CI - 1.63 to 0.32; p = 0.19) or the proportion that achieved target heart rate (risk ratio [RR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.36-1.97; p = 0.70). Conventional selective beta-1 blockers were inferior for target heart rate reduction versus control (RR 0.33, 0.17-0.64; p < 0.001), whereas super-selective beta-1 blockers were superior (RR 1.98, 1.54-2.54; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between beta-blockers and comparators for secondary outcomes of conversion to sinus rhythm (RR 1.15, 0.90-1.46; p = 0.28), hypotension (RR 1.85, 0.87-3.93; p = 0.11), bradycardia (RR 1.29, 0.25-6.82; p = 0.76) or adverse events leading to drug discontinuation (RR 1.03, 0.49-2.17; p = 0.93). The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia were greater with non-selective beta-blockers (p = 0.031 and p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Across all intravenous beta-blockers, there was no difference with other medications for acute heart rate control in atrial fibrillation and flutter. Efficacy and safety may be improved by choosing beta-blockers with higher beta-1 selectivity.

[Atrial fibrillation - what should be taken into account with chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis?]

CKD is a common comorbidity in patients with atrial fibrillation. The CHA2DS2-VASc score is not validated in patients with severe CKD and has a low predictive value in dialysis patients. As NOACs are partly eliminated by the kidneys the dosage has to be adapted in CKD. Recent studies indicate an acceptable safety profile for NOACs in CKD. However, larger randomized studies are still lacking. The results from prospective studies with placebo i.e., no anticoagulation therapy, are pending.

Systolic blood pressure visit-to-visit variability and outcomes in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation

We aimed to assess the association between SBP-VVV and outcomes in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). AF patients in the COOL-AF registry with SBP measured at baseline, and at least two other visits were studied. We defined SBP-VVV using the standard deviation (SD) of average SBP. Patients were categorized according to the quartiles of SBP SD. The associations between SBP-VVV and outcomes were assessed in the adjusted Cox model. We studied 3172 patients (mean age 67.7 years; 41.8% female), with the prevalence of hypertension being 69%. Warfarin was used in 69% of patients, whereas 7% received non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. The minimum and maximum SD of average SBP in the study population was 0.58 and 56.38 mmHg respectively. The cutoff of SD of average SBP for each quartile in our study were 9.09, 12.15, and 16.21 mmHg. The rates of all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke or systemic embolization (SSE), major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were 3.10, 1.42, 2.09, and 0.64 per 100 person-years, respectively. Compared with the first quartile, patients in the fourth quartile had a significantly higher risk of mortality (adjusted HR 1.60, 95%CI 1.13-2.25), bleeding (aHR 1.92, 95%CI 1.25-2.96) and ICH (aHR 3.51, 95%CI 1.40-8.76). The risk of SSE was not significantly different among the quartiles. SBP-VVV had a significant impact on the long-term outcomes of Asian patients with AF, particularly mortality and bleeding. Adequate SBP control and maintaining SBP stability over time may improve outcomes for AF patients.

Off-Label Reduced Dose Apixaban in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation and Associated Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Apixaban is commonly used to prevent stroke in older adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Although its package insert has specific dose reduction criteria, providers may dose reduce outside of these parameters based on clinical scenarios.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to determine the incidence of apixaban off-label reduced dosing, while secondarily determining the safety and efficacy outcomes associated with such dosing.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients aged 65 and older with orders for apixaban for AF was institutional review board (IRB)-approved and conducted across 3 academic medical centers. Patients receiving off-label reduced-dose apixaban (ie, "underdosed") were matched to a cohort of patients dosed according to the package insert at the standard dosing (5 mg twice daily) using stratified random sampling. Secondary outcomes included 1-year incidence of major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), and mortality. The Fisher exact tests were used to compare between-group differences.

RESULTS

Of the 1172 patients meeting initial inclusion criteria, 201 (17%) were dosed off-label, with 175 (15%) "underdosed." The 147 "underdosed" patients with documented follow-up were matched with 139 patients receiving standard Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-labeled dosing. There were no significant differences in incidence of stroke (2.7% vs 2.2%), major bleeding (0% vs 0.7%), and CRNMB (2.7% vs 1.4%) in the off-label reduced dosing versus standard dosing groups. All-cause mortality was higher in the off-label reduced-dose group (16 [10.9%] vs 2 [1.4%], P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Older adults with nonvalvular AF are commonly prescribed lower-than-recommended doses of apixaban. However, no significant association was found between empiric off-label reduced dosing and stroke or bleeding outcomes.

The Cost of Breaking Even: a Perspective on the Net Clinical Impact of Adding Aspirin to Antithrombotic Therapies in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

PURPOSE

Outcomes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) inform the latest recommendations on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) management of a short period of oral anticoagulation (OAC), a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, and aspirin for 1 week or until hospital discharge in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PCI, and up to 4 weeks in individuals considered to be at high-risk for ischemic events, followed by discontinuation of aspirin and continuation of OAC and a P2Y12 inhibitor for up to 12 months.

METHODS

We examined and summarized the outcomes of bleeding and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) from RCTs and meta-analyses, published between 2013 and 2022, comparing therapy with OAC and a P2Y12 inhibitor with and without aspirin in AF patients undergoing PCI with stenting.

RESULTS

Data comparing dual therapy with OAC and a P2Y12 inhibitor alone to triple therapy with OAC, a P2Y12 inhibitor, and aspirin with respect to the risks of MACEs, including stent thrombosis within the first 30 days, are underpowered and inconclusive. The addition of aspirin does not appear to be associated with a decreased risk of ischemic events, even in patients with high-risk CHA2DS2-VASc scores, but does significantly increase bleeding hazards. The increased safety of newer generation drug-eluting stents may have further minimized any theoretical anti-ischemic benefits of aspirin. The possible attenuation of the pleiotropic effects of concomitant cardiovascular medications by aspirin may also have been a contributing factor.

CONCLUSION

The addition of aspirin to OAC and a P2Y12 inhibitor is likely associated with a net clinical harm in patients with AF who undergo PCI with stenting, even within the first 1-4 weeks after PCI. Revisiting the guideline recommendations to administer aspirin in this timeframe may be warranted.

Patient concern regarding bleeding side effects from oral anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation: an analysis from the multicentre KiCS-AF registry

AIMS

The purpose of this study is to utilize patient-reported outcomes to determine the percentage of patients concerned about mild to moderate bleeding side effects of anticoagulants.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We consecutively enrolled 3312 newly diagnosed or referred patients for atrial fibrillation (AF) management from 11 sites within the Keio interhospital Cardiovascular Studies-Atrial Fibrillation registry between September 2012 and May 2018. Of these patients, 2636 (79.5%) were taking oral anticoagulants at enrollment. Using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-life questionnaire (AFEQT), the patients who responded '1: not at all bothered' or '2: hardly bothered' on the seven-point scale regarding bleeding side effects were classified as the 'no OAC concern' group while those responding '3: a little bothered' to '7: extremely bothered' were classified as the 'OAC concern' group. On baseline analysis, 29.3% (n = 772) were 'concerned' about bleeding side effects. The proportion of women and patients with AF-related symptoms was higher in the oral anticoagulant (OAC) concern vs. no OAC concern group (36.9% vs. 29.8%, P < 0.0004 and 66.2% vs. 56.7%, P < 0.0001, respectively). The CHADS2 scores ≥ 2 were comparable between groups. Of the 430 patients in the 1-year follow-up analysis, the proportion of the continued OAC concern group (1 year from enrollment) was 41.6%. The dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban usage rates were comparable between the two groups in baseline and 1-year follow-up analysis.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-third of all patients with AF on anticoagulant therapy were concerned regarding bleeding from short- and long-term anticoagulant use.

Practical use case of natural language processing for observational clinical research data retrieval from electronic health records: AssistMED project

INTRODUCTION

Electronic health records (EHRs) contain data valuable for clinical research. However, they are in textual format and require manual encoding to databases, which is a lengthy and costly process. Natural language processing (NLP) is a computational technique that allows for text analysis.

OBJECTIVES

Our study aimed to demonstrate a practical use case of NLP for a large retrospective study cohort characterization and comparison with human retrieval.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Anonymized discharge documentation of 10 314 patients from a cardiology tertiary care department was analyzed for inclusion in the CRAFT registry (Multicenter Experience in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated with Oral Anticoagulants; NCT02987062). Extensive clinical characteristics regarding concomitant diseases, medications, daily drug dosages, and echocardiography were collected manually and through NLP.

RESULTS

There were 3030 and 3029 patients identified by human and NLP‑based approaches, respectively, reflecting 99.93% accuracy of NLP in detecting AF. Comprehensive baseline patient characteristics by NLP was faster than human analysis (3 h and 15 min vs 71 h and 12 min). The calculated CHA2DS2VASc and HAS‑BLED scores based on both methods did not differ (human vs NLP; median [interquartile range], 3 [2-5] vs 3 [2-5]; P = 0.74 and 1 [1-2] vs 1 [1-2]; P = 0.63, respectively). For most data, an almost perfect agreement between NLP- and human-retrieved characteristics was found; daily dosage identification was the least accurate NLP feature. Similar conclusions on cohort characteristics would be made; however, daily dosage detection for some drug groups would require additional human validation in the NLP‑based cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

NLP utilization in EHRs may accelerate data acquisition and provide accurate information for retrospective studies.