Comparison of the efficacy and safety of flunarizine to propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine

This study was designed to compare flunarizine, a cerebro-specific calcium channel antagonist, and propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine with or without aura. Following a 1 month single-blind placebo baseline period, 94 patients were equitably randomised under double-blind conditions to take flunarizine 10 mg daily or propranolol 80 mg twice daily for 4 months. Both treatments led to a significant reduction in the frequency of migraines and use of rescue analgesics with a significantly greater decrease in number of attacks for flunarizine after 1 and 4 months. Neither treatment affected the severity nor duration of migraines. Overall, 67% of flunarizine patients and 51% of propranolol patients responded positively. Propranolol significantly reduced blood pressure and heart rate; flunarizine had no effect on cardiovascular function. Weight gain was noted with both treatments. Flunarizine is at least as effective as propranolol in the prophylactic treatment of migraine and may have a better safety profile.

[Calcium channel blockers and prevention of migraine]

Calcium antagonists have been proposed for the prophylactic treatment of migraine because of their putative vasodilating antispasmodic effect and of their action against the cellular consequences of brain hypoxia. Published reports of controlled double-blind studies of calcium antagonists for the prophylactic treatment of migraine are reviewed herein. The effectiveness of verapamil, diltiazem, and nifedipine in this indication cannot be considered as firmly demonstrated, when problems with trial design and the amount of available data are taken into account. Nimodipine failed to demonstrate significant effectiveness in migraine with or without an aura. In contrast, the ability of a diphenylpiperazine, flunarizine, to decrease the incidence of migraine attacks in patients with common or classical migraine has been firmly demonstrated, although there is less evidence of this agent's effectiveness on the duration and severity of attacks. The percentage of patients who respond to flunarizine seems comparable to the percentages of propranolol or pizotifen responders. However, flunarizine is associated with unpleasant (weight gain) or severe (extrapyramidal or depressive symptoms) adverse effects which limit its place to that of a second-line drug. Lastly, the analysis of these studies failed to disclose a correlation between calcium movements across the cell membrane and effectiveness for the prevention of migraine attacks. Flunarizine's effect in migraine probably involves monoamine mechanisms which bear no relation to calcium.

[A case report of severe urinary retention and meteorism during flunarizine administration]

A case of flunarizine hydrochloride (FZ)-induced severe urinary retention and meteorism which resulted from sphincter spasm of the urinary bladder and the anus is presented. An 81-year-old female had received 10 mg/day FZ orally for 12 months before hypokinesia and general fatigue developed. Physical examination revealed slight rigidity of the extremities, abdominal distention and spasm of the anal sphincter muscle. Laboratory examinations showed uremia (BUN 88 mg/dl, Creatinine 16.8 mg/dl) and abdominal X-ray demonstrated marked distention of the small and large bowels. Renal failure improved within 2 days after massive urination using a urethral catheter. Abdominal distention was improved by the ileus and anal tubes. The difficulties of urination and defecation and decreased mobility of the extremities were resolved one month after the cessation of FZ. No organic changes were detected in urinary, intestinal and neurological systems by cystoscopy, CT, MRI and gastrointestinal fiberscopy. Serum concentration of FZ was 42.5 ng/ml on admission but decreased slowly to 17.9 ng/ml 80 days later. Serum half life was calculated to be 55 days which was 3 times longer than that healthy younger volunteers.

Flunarizine versus metoprolol in migraine prophylaxis: a double-blind, randomized parallel group study of efficacy and tolerability

The prophylactic effect of flunarizine and metoprolol was studied in a multi-center randomized, double-blind trial of 149 patients with migraine with or without aura. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, patients were randomly allocated to treatment with flunarizine 10 mg daily or metoprolol 200 mg daily for 16 weeks (parallel group design). Both drugs reduced the number of migraine days per month by 37% (95% confidence interval 21-53%) compared with the placebo run-in period. All efficacy parameters were significantly reduced by both drugs and no significant difference was found between the two drugs at any time of the treatment period. However, calculation of the 95% confidence limits showed that each drug may have a superiority of more than 100% on a single main effect parameter. The most common adverse experiences were day-time sedation (both drugs) and weight gain (flunarizine). Depression was the most serious side-effect occurring in 8% on flunarizine and 3% on metoprolol. We conclude that both drugs are effective in the prevention of migraine attacks but a higher number of dropouts occurred on flunarizine because of depression or weight gain.

[Trial of amitriptyline versus flunarizine as treatment of vestibular diseases. A preliminary study]

109 patients with vestibular disease were included in two different treatments with amitriptyline (Group A:53 patients with depressive symptoms), or flunarizine (Group B: 56 patients). Vertiginous symptoms, basic vestibular exploration, depressive disorder, cochlear symptoms, vegetative disorders and headache were evaluated. Among the patients treated with amitriptyline a significant decrease in the vertiginous symptoms were observed. The possible mechanism of action were analyzed too.

Flunarizine in migraine prophylaxis: an Indian trial

Flunarizine, a calcium channel blocker is considered useful in migraine prophylaxis. We report the first Indian trial with this drug. Fifteen patients with migraine were studied in a 6 months double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Flunarizine was superior to placebo in reducing the severity and duration of the individual attacks though there was no statistically significant effect on frequency of migraine attacks. The side effects most frequently caused by flunarizine were weight gain and daytime sleepiness.

Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of flunarizine as add-on therapy in refractory childhood epilepsy

Flunarizine (FLN) has been suggested as an add-on treatment in drug-resistant epilepsy patients. In view of the discordant experiences and of the paucity of controlled trials in children, we studied its effectiveness in 20 patients aged 6 to 18 years (10 males and 10 females), affected by drug-resistant epilepsy. 14 had symptomatic generalized epilepsy (the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in 10; other forms in 4); 3 had cryptogenic generalized epilepsy (the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in 2; myoclonic absences epilepsy in 1); 3 had symptomatic partial epilepsy (temporal lobe epilepsy). 7 of them were withdrawn: only 1 because of side effects. An initial four-month baseline pretrial period was followed by two four-month periods of administration of FLN or a placebo, under double blind conditions, in a randomized sequence. Preexisting antiepileptic (AEDs) medication was maintained at a constant dose throughout the study. FLN was administered as drops in a single evening dose of 5 mg (patients less than 10 years) or 10 mg. (patients greater than 10 years). During the pretrial phase, after phase 1 and phase 2, a waking EEG was recorded and blood samples were taken for hematology, hepatic-function tests, and AED serum levels. The evaluation of the activity of FLN was based on the total number of seizures. A 30-60% reduction in seizure frequency was found in 5 out of the 13 patients completing the trial (no changes occurred in the remainders). This result did not appear to be due to changes in the plasma levels of the AEDs. No significant differences were seen in the EEG paroxysmal activity in the three phases of the study. Side effects were rare. The serum FLN levels ranged between 16.4 and 109 ng/ml. It seems that the antiepileptic properties of FLN need further validation, particularly in childhood.

[Iatrogenic diseases in the elderly]

The growing number of drugs used to treat various diseases and the growing number of invasive procedures used for diagnosis and therapy have generated many iatrogenic diseases. Elderly patients are more likely than the young to react adversely to drugs since the physiological functions of the organs, especially of the kidneys, decrease and pharmacokinetic characteristics altered. In addition, multiple disease states are common in the elderly, and multiple drugs are consequently prescribed. In the present study, adverse effects of so-called "cerebroactive drugs" and "cerebral vasodilators" are discussed. More than 30 kinds of these drugs are on the market in Japan and are widely prescribed for "chronic cerebrovascular diseases" and "dementia syndromes" in the elderly. In contrast, they are rarely used in Western Europe and not on the market in the United States. Among them, calcium hopantenate was the first of "cerebral activators" and was the most popular. In 1986, however, the first cases of toxic encephalopathy induced by calcium hopantenate were reported. It resembled Reye syndrome, showing coma, hepatic failure, lactic acidosis and hypoglycemia and was frequently fatal. More than 47 victims including 11 fatal cases have been reported since. Flunarizine, a cerebral vasodilator, produced high rates of parkinsonism and depression. Multicenter studies have revealed that these side effects occurred in 10-30% of the elderly patients who had taken it. These symptoms usually appeared several months after flunarizine was started. Some of the adverse effects of the drugs may be unpredictable and inevitable, but most of them can be prevented or reduced if physicians are more careful with their patients, and drugs and their adverse effects.2

Flunarizine in migraine: a minireview

Flunarizine is a non-selective calcium antagonist. It distributes preferentially in the adipose tissue and passes the blood brain barrier. Numerous controlled clinical studies have established that flunarizine is efficacious in migraine prophylaxis, including double-blind studies in which the drug was compared with placebo or other antimigraine drugs. To avoid side effects a special schedule or administration is necessary. Flunarizine has no myogenic effect on smooth muscle cells of the vessles. It is said to be the only calcium antagonist able to protect brain cells against hypoxic damage. In addition, the considerable body of information which shows flunarizine capable of directly influencing the central nervous system, suggests that the drug's anti-migraine action may depend on its ability to influence central phenomena.

[Raynaud's phenomenon and calcium blocking agents. A preliminary open study with flunarizine]

Raynaud's phenomenon (Raynaud's disease), an accessual vascular acrosyndrome characterised by an important constriction of distal arterioles, has still no specific pharmacological therapy. In the last years, the use of calcium-entry-blockers (nifedipine, diltiazem, verapamil, nicardipine), drugs able to control the contractility of the vessels, showed some positive results. Considering this data, we appraised the efficacy of flunarizine, another calcium-entry-blocker, in a preliminary study of 28 patients (23 females, 5 males, aged between 15 and 48 years) suffering from Raynaud's disease. Apart from a statistically insignificant improvement of subjective symptoms (i.e. acroparesthesias, cold extremities) flunarizine (10 mg/day for 1 month) did not have positive results. Finally, this drug caused some side-effects: drowsiness, increase of weight and appetite, but without a real necessity for withdrawal of therapy.

[Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of flunarizine in multimorbid, geriatric patients with vertigo]

Ten multimorbid, geriatric, hospitalised patients, mean age 76 years, were treated for vertigo and received 10 mg flunarizine (CAS 52468-60-7; Sibelium) daily for 3 weeks. The study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of this dosage scheme revealed that the kinetics did not change during the three weeks of therapy. The terminal half-life is 7.3 +/- 3.3 days. Since a steady state concentration is only to be expected after about 5 half-lives, this condition was not fully met yet in most patients after three weeks. The data obtained from the patients examined are essentially identical with those in young and old healthy subjects. The unchanged kinetics during long-term treatment prevent side-effects due to cumulation on the one hand or the decrease of plasma levels to inactive concentrations resulting from enzyme induction. There was not measurable anti-aggregator effect on thrombocytes or erythrocytes. The effectiveness in connection with vertigo seems to be due to a direct labyrinth depressor activity and/or to a selective vasospecific action. No side-effects were observed during the three weeks of therapy.

[The treatment of juvenile migraine using flunarizine or propranolol]

The clinical efficacy of flunarizine and propranolol for the prevention of migraine attacks was assessed in 33 children in a double blind study. After a run-in phase of one month, 32 patients started the active medication. A reduction in the number of migraine attacks was observed in 75% of the flunarizine group and in 73.8% of the propranolol group. Propranolol also reduced the severity of attacks. Transient side effects were observed in 3 of 17 of the flunarizine group and in 5 of 15 of the propranolol group. The most frequent side effect was increased fatigue, which required interruption of therapy in 2 patients of the propranolol group.

[Effect of flunarizine hydrochloride on striatal D-2 dopamine receptors]

Flunarizine hydrochloride (FZ) is used to improve cerebral circulation and possesses Ca antagonistic effects. In recent years, this drug has been reported to induce parkinsonism and depressive symptoms as side effects, particularly in the elderly. Effects of FZ on dopamine receptors of the rat striatum were studied by radiolabeled receptor assay to clarify the mechanism of onset of parkinsonism in response to FZ. FZ was found to directly and competitively affect D-2 receptors without affecting D-1 receptors. Furthermore, the effect of FZ on D-2 receptors was found to be antagonistic based on the finding that the displacement curve for FZ in the binding of [3H]spiperone to D-2 receptors remained unchanged even after the addition of GppNHp. The effect of FZ on the D-2 receptors in aged rats was more marked than that in young-adult rats. In addition, the tertiary structures of FZ and the anti-schizophrenic agents, pimozide and haloperidol, were examined using computer graphics. FZ was found to have a tertiary structure highly analogous to pimozide and haloperidol, and FZ also had an alkyl structure linking a fluorophenyl group and a nitrogen atom, believed to be particularly necessary for the binding of anti-schizophrenic agents to D-2 receptors. These results may contribute to clarifying the mechanism of onset of parkinsonism in response to FZ, especially in the elderly.

Flunarizine plasma concentrations and side effects in migraine patients

Flunarizine plasma concentrations and side effects were evaluated in migraine patients during a 3 month course of prophylactic treatment. Plasma concentrations did not correlate with daily dose (in mg/kg). Mean flunarizine levels were higher in patients showing sleepiness or sedation. Weight gain was independent of plasma concentrations. Future clinical trials of flunarizine should be supported by drug monitoring in order to clarify the relationship between plasma levels and drug effects.

Flunarizine (10 and 20 mg) i.v. versus placebo in the treatment of acute migraine attacks: a multi-centre double-blind study

In a multi-centre, randomized double-blind study, the effect and tolerance of 10 and 20 mg flunarizine i.v. versus placebo was tested on 102 migraineurs with acute migraine attacks with and/or without aura. Thirty-seven patients received 10 mg flunarizine, 32 received 20 mg and 33 received placebo. The groups were comparable. Response to treatment was defined as pain reduction of at least 50% within 60 min on a visual analogue scale after i.v. drug administration. This effect was noted on 59.4% with 20 mg flunarizine, on 24.3% with 10 mg flunarizine and on 30.3% with placebo. The tolerance of flunarizine i.v. was similar to placebo. Blood pressure and pulse rate were not affected by flunarizine. All in all, 20 mg flunarizine i.v. appeared to be a suitable alternative for treatment of acute migraine attacks.

[Extrapyramidal syndromes caused by flunarizine. Apropos of 6 cases]

The ability of flunarizine in inducing or worsening extrapyramidal symptoms is well documented. The relation with age or dose of such symptoms as their clinical characteristics remain controversial. We report 6 cases of extrapyramidal syndromes induced by flunarizine in five women and one man (mean age 71.5 +/- 5 years). The daily dose was 10 mg in five cases (as recommended by the marketing laboratory) and 20 mg in one patient. These observations allow to discuss the dose-dependent occurrence of this adverse reaction. In only three cases the reason for treatment was compatible with the official french indication. These side effects appeared after 7.0 +/- 1.6 months and disappeared after 2.2 +/- 0.5 months respectively. Flunarizine-induced extrapyramidal symptoms are mainly characterized by tremor (which was the main symptom in 4 cases and the only one in 2 cases).

Flunarizine in migraine prophylaxis: efficacy and tolerability of 5 mg and 10 mg dose levels

The use of flunarizine, a drug which has proven its efficacy in migraine, is often associated with important side effects. The aim of this paper has been to check their incidence at different dose levels (5 mg vs 10 mg). Our data confirm the occurrence of important side effects (in particular weight gain); on the other hand, they emphasize the dose-dependency of the side effects.

Insomnia and perceptual disturbances during flunarizine treatment

We report two cases of sleep disturbances and perceptual disorder appearing in close temporal relationship with initiation of flunarizine therapy for migraine prophylaxis: these side effects disappeared after therapy interruption; resumption of the drug in one case was associated with symptom recurrence.

Rapid method for estimating the risk of acutely controversial side effects of prescription drugs

When controversy suddenly erupts about the risk of using a prescription drug, there is an urgent need for fast methods of risk estimation. Some unexpected side-effects of prescription drugs are indications for the prescribing of another kind of drug. If the risk of such a side-effect is high, it should be reflected in clustered prescribing of the side-effect-alleviating drug in sequence with the side-effect-causing drug. The risk of drug-attributable side-effects can be estimated by comparing average incidences of initial prescriptions for the side-effect-alleviating drug before, during, and long after the dispensing of the presumed side-effect-causing drug. We monitored computerized, complete drug dispensing records of anonymous outpatients for use of flunarizine, an anti-vertigo/anti-migraine drug that case reports had suggested causes mental depression and/or Parkinsonism. Among 1284 patients who eventually got flunarizine during a 31 month period, 1 in 7 was started on an anti-depressant before or long after flunarizine; only 1 in 82 might be said to have been started on an anti-depressant because of flunarizine. There was no evidence that anti-Parkinson drugs were started because of flunarizine, though the numbers are small. The analysis takes only a few days, and can help set bounds on risks of the subset of adverse drug reactions that are themselves indications for use of other drugs.

Lichen planus induced by flunarizine

A 56-year-old man developed lichen planus while taking flunarizine, a di-fluorinated derivate of cinnarizine. Induction of lichen planus by cinnarizine therapy has been described but the precise etiopathological mechanism is unclear. Although flunarizine is widely prescribed, lichen planus induced (?) by this drug has, to our knowledge, never been reported.

[Parkinson disease induced by flunarizine]

The authors studied 19 patients with parkinsonism induced by flunarizine. All them improved when the drug therapy was discontinued for periods from 7 days to 10 months. Depression was observed in 68.5% of the patients.

Flunarizine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in neurological disorders

Flunarizine is a class IV calcium antagonist with a pharmacological profile which suggests its therapeutic potential in a number of neurological and cerebrovascular disorders. It is an effective prophylactic treatment for common or classic migraine in children and adults, and it appears at least as effective as a number of other agents which act by different pharmacological mechanisms, including pizotifen (pizotyline), cinnarizine, methysergide, nimodipine, metoprolol, propranolol, aspirin and cyclandelate. Flunarizine is also effective in reducing the frequency of seizures, when used as an 'add-on' treatment, in some patients with partial or generalised epilepsy resistant to maximal therapy with a combination of several conventional antiepileptic drugs. Placebo-controlled studies show that flunarizine is effective in the treatment of vertigo and associated symptoms of either peripheral or central origin, and in the treatment of cerebrovascular insufficiency where psychological symptoms, rather than vertigo, are the primary symptoms. In the treatment of vertigo, flunarizine appears at least as effective as cinnarizine and more effective than nicergoline, betahistine dichlorhydrate, pentoxifylline (oxpentifylline) and vincamine. Flunarizine therefore is useful in the prophylaxis of migraine, an effective treatment for vertigo and a worthwhile alternative as 'add-on' therapy in patients with epilepsy resistant to conventional drugs.

[A side effect of flunarizine: severe parkinsonism]

The author describes the cases of eight patients with severe Parkinson syndrome who had their symptoms vanished after suspension of flunarizine, except for one case whose symptoms remitted partially. The author intention is clearly to alert to this unfavorable reaction, since there may be a lot of patients treated like having Parkinson disease in use of flunarizine.

Effects of flunarizine therapy on intractable epilepsy

In an open trial the antiepileptic effects of flunarizine were studied in 64 patients with intractable epilepsy, and the following results were obtained: 1. Seizures disappeared completely in 2 cases, with a 50% decrease in 6 cases. 2. Of the 25 patients who had accompanying psychiatric symptoms 8.0% showed an improvement in these symptoms. 3. While no marked side-effects were observed, some cases showed an increase in frequency of seizures and the trial was stopped for 8 cases. 4. "Global evaluation" showed an overall improvement rate of 9.4%. In 47 cases, in which changes in frequency of seizure were confirmed and dosage of flunarizine was subsequently changed, improvement rate was 12.8%. 5. The above results suggest that the effectiveness of flunarizine in this open trial was very low.

[Parkinsonism, depression and akathisia induced by flunarizine, a calcium entry blockade--report of 31 cases]

Flunarizine hydrochloride (FZ), a calcium entry blockade, has been used nationwide in Japan as a cerebral active vasodilator since October, 1984. The present paper reports 31 cases of FZ-induced Parkinsonism, depression and akathisia, referred to our hospital between October 1986 and September 1988. Out of the 31 patients, four including two with Parkinson's disease and one each with progressive supranuclear palsy and olivopontocerebellar atrophy showed worsening of their parkinsonian symptoms within a few months after FZ administration. The remaining 27 patients (7 males and 20 females) newly developed Parkinsonism after treatment with FZ. Symptoms appeared one week to two years (mean: 6.1 months) after starting FZ of a daily dose of 10 mg. FZ had been used in 6 patients for cerebrovascular episodes confirmed by clinical history or brain CT, and in the remainder, for dizziness, light-headedness, hypertension, amnesia or hypochondric neurotic complaints. Akinesia and bradykinesia progressed rather rapidly after onset, and patients became unambulatory within several months. Symptoms had worsened, and L-dopa, anticholinergic drugs, and bromocriptine had been ineffective until FZ was discontinued. Their Parkinsonism was characterized by marked akinesia, bradykinesia, and moderate rigidity. Masked face was seen in most of them. Tremor was absent at rest, and induced in 12 patients by posture and/or action. Sixteen patients were accompanied by depression, and five, by akathisia. Improvement began several weeks after withdrawal of FZ, and most patients recovered almost completely within a few months although mild rigidity and bradykinesia remained in some.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Flunarizine and propranolol in the treatment of migraine

The clinical efficacy of flunarizine and of propranolol for the prevention of migraine attacks was assessed in a multicenter double-blind study lasting four months which was preceded by a single-blind placebo period of one month. For both drugs, more than half of the patients judged the effect to be good or very good. When considering the patients' daily logs, both drugs produced a significant reduction of the number of attacks. Propranolol furthermore significantly reduced the severity of attacks and the number of analgesics used during the attacks. In both groups no severe side effects were observed.

Double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of flunarizine as adjunct therapy in epilepsy with complex partial seizures

Flunarizine was compared to placebo in a double-blind cross-over trial of 2 16-week treatment periods separated by a 4-week wash-out period. The patients had epilepsy with complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalised seizures. Twenty-nine patients entered the trial, but 7 dropped out. Of the 22 patients completing the trial, 13 were women; the median was 39 years (range 15-58) and the median duration of epilepsy 23 years (range 4-55). There was no statistically significant difference between flunarizine 15 mg daily and placebo as adjunct therapy in total seizure frequency, neuropsychological tests, and patient's preferences. No interactions with concomitant antiepileptic drugs and no laboratory abnormalities were registered.

Drug-induced tremor of the tongue

Two cases are reported in which a transient tremor of the tongue followed treatment with thioridazine and flunarizine. The finding of this kyperkinesia as the only extrapyramidal side-effect of drug therapy is uncommon.

Flunarizine i.v. in the acute treatment of common or classical migraine attacks--a placebo-controlled double blind trial

The efficacy and tolerance of 20 mg flunarizine i.v. were tested in comparison with placebo in a multicentre randomised double-blind trial in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. Sixty case reports were included in the evaluation; 31 patients were treated with flunarizine and 29 with placebo. Flunarizine proved to be significantly superior in its effect on the intensity of pain and the typical concomitant symptoms of the attacks. Patients were classed as responders who displayed a reduction in pain intensity by at least 50% within 60 minutes after the administration of flunarizine. 23 patients (= 74.2%) were responders, including 11 patients being without pain after 60 minutes. In the placebo group the responder rate was 27.6% The fact that both groups were comparable in all respects should be emphasized. The tolerance of intravenously administered flunarizine was excellent and corresponded to that of placebo. Apart from a sedative effect reported by 9 patients there were no side-effects. The circulatory conditions remained largely stable. The result of this study seems to indicate that an intravenous injection of 20 mg flunarizine might represent a genuine alternative, and as regards tolerance even a superior one, to the parenteral administration of ergotamine in migraine attacks.

Movement disorders and depression due to flunarizine and cinnarizine

Over the last few years, cases of movement disorders induced by flunarizine and cinnarizine have been increasingly reported. We describe a series of 101 patients, whose ages ranged from 37 to 84 years (mean 69.1), developing abnormal movements frequently associated with depression, secondary to treatment with either or both drugs. Symptoms closely resembled those induced by neuroleptic drugs and remitted on drug discontinuance in all but five cases after 5-22 months' follow-up. Whether or not such undesirable side effects are attributable to calcium antagonism and/or dopamine receptor blockade, long-term treatment with flunarizine or cinnarizine should be discouraged, particularly in the elderly.

Flunarizine (Sibelium) in the prophylaxis of migraine. An open, long-term, multicenter trial

Sixty-four Spanish neurological centers participated in a study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of flunarizine in migraine. One thousand four hundred and thirty-five outpatients (367 [25.6%] males and 1,068 [74.4%] females) fulfilling the criteria proposed by the International Headache Society for the diagnosis of migraine entered the study. Patients were treated with 10 mg of single-dose flunarizine (Sibelium) alone at bedtime in open fashion for 6 months. At the end of this treatment period, flunarizine was withdrawn, but the follow-up of the patients continued for another 6 months. The evaluation criteria used were a rating scale (the GES) based on frequency, duration, intensity, and characteristics of the attacks as well as a checklist of possible side-effects. This clinical assessment was recorded in detail in the patients' rating notebooks at the start and at the end of the third, sixth, ninth, and twelfth month of the study. A mean decrease of 66.9% in the GES was obtained at the end of the treatment period, which implies a good or excellent result in the prophylaxis of migraine attacks in 69.5% of the patients. This improvement was practically unchanged at the end of the follow-up period. Side-effects were moderate, the most frequent ones being drowsiness and weight gain. Their incidence decreased after the first months of treatment.

Flunarizine vs. propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine: two double-blind comparative studies in more than 400 patients

In the course of a 16 weeks' interval treatment of migraine in connection with two multicenter double-blind studies, flunarizine was compared with propranolol in patients suffering predominantly from "classical migraine". Eighty-seven patients from 12 outpatient departments were admitted to the first study, while 434 patients from 99 medical practices participated in the second study. After each month of treatment, the patients were clinically evaluated, and the number, duration, and severity of attacks were documented. Concerning the frequency and intensity of attacks, additional analgesics consumption and overall evaluation, both drugs proved to be highly effective in the practice as well as in the hospital study. The percentage and severity of side-effects were comparable in the two treatment groups. Summarizing, it may be stated that the studies proved the efficacy of flunarizine to be rather similar to that of propranolol in the prophylactic treatment of migraine.

Flunarizine i.v. in the acute treatment of the migraine attack. A double-blind placebo-controlled study

Flunarizine, 20 mg by slow intravenous injection, was studied in the acute treatment of migraine attacks in a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. At the end of the 60 min observation period, 23 of the 31 (74.2%) patients treated with flunarizine reported complete relief, or a pain reduction of more than 50%, vs. 8 of 29 (27.6%) placebo patients (p less than 0.017). Accompanying symptoms also improved significantly better in the flunarizine than in the placebo group. The investigators evaluated the therapy as good or excellent in 77.4% of the flunarizine and in 27.6% of the placebo patients, respectively. Tolerance of the therapy was good and comparable in the two groups. Somnolence was the only flunarizine-related adverse reaction. Blood pressure and heart rate were not affected. Flunarizine i.v. deserves further study in the acute treatment of a migraine attack.

Treatment with an i.v. calcium overload blocker (flunarizine) in acute stroke. A pilot study

In an open pilot study 55 patients suffering from acute stroke were treated with Flunarizine, a calcium overload blocker, in addition to standard therapy including diet, physiotherapy, adequate management of accompanying disorders, and hemodilution. The initial high-dose i.v. treatment (2 X 25 mg Flunarizine/day) and the subsequent oral regimen were well-tolerated. The main side effect was slight transient weariness. No adverse effects regarding blood pressure, heart rate, enzymes, blood analysis, renal function and, especially, no extrapyramidal motor symptoms or depression were detected. Flunarizine may be regarded as a relatively safe drug in acute stroke. The probable beneficial effect on the patient's recovery will be evaluated in a multicenter double-blind study.

Flunarizine-induced parkinsonism in the elderly

Twenty-seven patients (19 women and 8 men, ages 63 to 88 years; mean, 74 years) displayed mild to moderate parkinsonism and altered ballistic motor performances during long-term flunarizine treatment. One month after, flunarizine withdrawal, 20 patients showed clear-cut improvements in both clinical features and ballistic motor performances; a complete recovery within 6 months was observed in all these patients but one, who still showed very mild slowness of movement. On the other hand, seven patients showed little clinical improvement and still maintained markedly altered ballistic motor performances 1 month after drug withdrawal. At the 2-month follow-up assessments, either they did not improve further or they deteriorated; they were successfully treated with L-dopa and, despite the ameliorations, after 12 to 24 months they still have definite parkinsonian syndrome. The authors conclude that (1) flunarizine, even at the recommended dose (10 mg daily), can induce reversible parkinsonism, at least in subjects older than 60; (2) the persistence of a marked symptomatology 2 months after flunarizine withdrawal should lead to starting treatment with antiparkinsonism drugs; (3) the study of ballistic movements is proposed as a useful tool for objective quantification and early detection of bradykinesia.

Flunarizine-induced parkinsonism: clinical report

We consider 24 cases of iatrogenic parkinsonism related to flunarizine, evaluating the clinical features of the syndrome and the improvement following withdrawal.

Double-blind placebo-controlled trial with flunarizine in therapy-resistant epileptic patients

The anticonvulsant efficacy and side-effect liability of flunarizine (15 mg/day) was investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design in 30 outpatients with drug-resistant complex partial seizures. Flunarizine or placebo was added to the preexisting medication and each patient was followed up for 10 months. At the end of the study data from 22 patients were available for evaluation. In patients taking first flunarizine and then placebo, plasma levels of flunarizine were still detectable at the end of the 4 months' placebo phase. In the group of 13 patients starting therapy with placebo, a significant seizure frequency reduction was observed during the flunarizine period in 11 patients, whereas one patient showed no change and seizure frequency increased in another patient. Two patients had a 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Flunarizine was well tolerated and few side effects were noted.