Calcium antagonists for acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

The sudden loss of blood supply in ischemic stroke is associated with an increase of calcium ions within neurons. Inhibiting this increase could protect neurons and might reduce neurological impairment, disability, and handicap after stroke.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of calcium antagonists for reducing the risk of death or dependency after acute ischemic stroke. We investigated the influence of different drugs, dosages, routes of administration, time intervals after stroke, and trial design on the outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

The evidence is current to 6 February 2018. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (6 February 2018), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 2), MEDLINE Ovid (1950 to 6 February 2018), Embase Ovid (1980 to 6 February 2018), and four Chinese databases (6 February 2018): Chinese Biological Medicine Database (CBM-disc), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Periodical Database of VIP information, and Wanfang Data. We also searched the following trials registers: ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, Stroke Trials Registry, ISRCTN registry, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, and we contacted trialists and researchers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing a calcium antagonist versus control in people with acute ischemic stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and applied the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the evidence. We used death or dependency at the end of long-term follow-up (at least three months) in activities of daily living as the primary outcome. We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 34 trials involving 7731 participants. All the participants were in the acute stage of ischemic stroke, and their age ranged from 18 to 85 years, with the average age ranging from 52.3 to 74.6 years across different trials. There were more men than women in most trials. Twenty-six trials tested nimodipine, and three trials assessed flunarizine. One trial each used isradipine, nicardipine, PY108-608, fasudil, and lifarizine. More than half of these trials followed participants for at least three months. Calcium antagonists showed no effects on the primary outcome (risk ratio (RR) 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98 to 1.13; 22 trials; 22 studies; 6684 participants; moderate-quality evidence) or on death at the end of follow-up (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.17; 31 trials; 7483 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Thirteen trials reported adverse events, finding no significant differences between groups. Most trials did not report the allocation process or how they managed missing data, so we considered these at high risk of selection and attrition bias. Most trials reported double-blind methods but did not state who was blinded, and none of the trial protocols were available.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence to support the use of calcium antagonists in people with acute ischemic stroke.

Sibelium in combination with dibazole in the treatment of angioneurotic headache

Angioneurotic headache is a common nerve headache featured by intermittence, repetition, paroxysm and aggravation, which can severely affect the sufferer’s quality of life. Currently, there are multiple drugs which can be used for relieving this type of headache, and the effectiveness and safety of drugs have been a subject of interest in clinical practice. To observe the effects of sibelium in combination with dibazole and offer a basis for the clinical treatment, 136 patients with angioneurotic headache who were admitted to hospital between February and September 2015 were selected and randomly divided into a test group and a control group, 68 in each. Patients in the test group were treated with sibelium in combination with dibazole, while patients in the control group were given sibelium only. The effects, adverse reactions, complications and toxic and side effects of the treatment in the two groups were observed. Furthermore, the blood flow speed and hemodynamic changes before and after treatment were compared. The results demonstrated that the hemodynamic indexes and cerebral blood flow speed of the patients in the test group showed obvious changes after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the improvement of the above indexes of the test group was superior to that of the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P<0.05); the overall effective rate of the test group was higher than that of the control group (94.12% vs 76.47%) (P<0.05); the medication safety of the test group was higher than that of the control group (all P<0.05). It can be concluded that sibelium in combination with dibazole has a remarkable effect in treating angioneurotic headache as it can significantly improve hemodynamic indexes and cerebral blood flow speed. Moreover, the therapy seldom induces toxic and side effects, adverse reactions or complications.

[A comparative study of the effectiveness of topiramate and flunarizine in independent series of chronic migraine patients without medication abuse]

INTRODUCTION

Topiramate and onabotulinumtoxin A have proven to be effective in chronic migraine with or without medication abuse according to recent criteria of the International Headache Society's Headache Classification.

AIMS

To show that flunarizine is as effective as topiramate in cases of chronic migraine without medication abuse.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective, non-randomised, comparative study of two groups of patients paired by age and sex, with chronic migraine without abuse, who had been treated preventively for the first time with topiramate or flunarizine.

RESULTS

Forty patients treated with flunarizine were assigned a patient of their same sex and age who was being treated with topiramate. The mean rate of reduction in intense migraines in the topiramate group was 59% and in the flunarizine group, 58.5% (p = 0.9444); the responder rate at four months of treatment did not show any significant differences either, the figures being 75% for topiramate and 70% for flunarizine (p = 0.6236). The mean reduction of other headaches in the topiramate group was 57% and in the flunarizine group, 64% (p = 0.4261); the responder rate at four months of treatment was similar in the two groups: 76%. The percentage of dropouts from treatment was higher with topiramate (19.5%) than with flunarizine (10%) (p = 0.3493). No serious side effects occurred in either of the groups. In all, 78.9% of the patients who took topiramate said they were satisfied with the drug versus 75% of those in the flunarizine group (p = 0.7903).

CONCLUSIONS

Flunarizine proved to be as effective as topiramate in the treatment of chronic migraine without medication abuse.

Calcium antagonists as an add-on therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library 2001, Issue 4.Nearly a third of people with epilepsy do not have their seizures controlled with current treatments. Continuous attempts have been made to find new antiepileptic drugs based on increasing knowledge of the cellular and molecular biology involved in the genesis of epilepsy and seizures. Therefore, calcium antagonists that can alter the effects of calcium on brain cells have been investigated for their effect on epileptic seizures.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of calcium antagonists when used as an add-on therapy for people with drug-resistant epilepsy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register (29 January 2013), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 12), MEDLINE (1948 to 29 January 2013) and SCOPUS (all years to 29 January 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo-controlled or active-controlled add-on trials of any calcium antagonist in people with drug-resistant epilepsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (MH and JP) independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. Outcomes investigated included 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, treatment withdrawal, adverse effects, cognition and quality of life. Analyses were by intention to treat.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven trials were included with a total of 424 participants, one parallel-group and seven cross-over trials of flunarizine, two cross-over trials of nimodipine and one cross-over trial of nifedipine.For flunarizine, the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency in a single parallel trial was 1.53 (95% CI 0.59 to 3.96) indicating a non-significant advantage of flunarizine. We were unable to acquire data for this outcome from the other seven cross-over trials. The overall RR for treatment withdrawal of flunarizine was 7.11 (95% CI 1.73 to 29.30) indicating individuals were significantly more likely to have flunarizine withdrawn than placebo. No adverse effects were associated statistically with flunarizine.For nifedipine, we were unable to acquire the data we required for our specified outcomes.For nimodipine, we had data only from the first treatment period from one of the two cross-over trials (17 participants). The RR for a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency was 7.78 (99% CI 0.46 to 130.88) and for treatment withdrawal the RR was 2.25 (99% CI 0.25 to 20.38).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Flunarizine may have a weak effect on seizure frequency but had a significant withdrawal rate, probably due to adverse effects, and should not be recommended for use as an add-on treatment. Similarly, there is no convincing evidence to support the use of nifedipine or nimodipine as add-on treatments for epilepsy.

Pharmacological prevention of migraine: to be considered case by case

(1) Migraines are characterized by recurrent headaches generally lasting between 4 and 72 hours and disappearing without complication. They can be incapacitating, owing to their frequency and/or intensity. (2) Many drugs have been used to prevent migraines. One of the most common outcome measures used in clinical trials is the proportion of responder patients, defined as those in whom the monthly frequency of migraines is at least halved. On average, about one-third of patients respond to placebo in clinical trials. (3) Propranolol is the betablocker with the best-documented efficacy: in absolute terms the response rate is about 30% higher than with placebo. The adverse effects of betablockers are mainly cardiovascular and neuropsychological. (4) Valproic acid, an anticonvulsant, is about as effective as propranolol, and its adverse effects are generally acceptable. (5) Amitriptyline is the antidepressant with the best-documented preventive effects, with a response rate about 20% higher than placebo. Its principal adverse effects are due to its atropinic action. Amitriptyline can also have a sedative effect. (6) Flunarizine also has documented efficacy, but this "hidden neuroleptic" can cause extrapyramidal disorders and weight gain. (7) Among the serotonergic antagonists, methysergide has documented efficacy but long-term treatment can lead to serious retroperitoneal, pulmonary or cardiac fibrosis. Pizotifen causes drowsiness or weight gain in about 50% of patients. (8) The choice of preventive treatment for migraine must be based on the balance between efficacy (compared to placebo) and adverse effects. In practice, the first choice drug is propranolol. (9) Because the frequency of migraines fluctuates over time, withdrawal of prophylaxis should be attempted on a regular basis, with the patient's consent.

Uso de antagonistas del calcio en el tratamiento del síndrome uretral en las mujeres con urgencia e incontinencia urinaria

OBJECTIVE

The action of the antagonists of the calcium was evaluated in the Urethral Syndrome of the woman (incontinence, urgency, disury).

PATIENT AND METHODS

In 60 female's patients that went for urethral syndrome. I used the Cinarizina in 20 patients, and the Flunarizina in 20 patients. And in 20 patients were used placebo.

RESULTS

In the patients that used Flunarizina and Cinarizina were observed a reduction of the urine incontinence, of the urgency, and the disury, the micturition was lingering and easy, the number of the micturitions decreased by the morning, compared with the patients that used placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

The antagonists of the calcium can be useful in those patients with urethral syndrome especially the biggest women.

[Topiramate or flunarizine in the preventive treatment of migraine. A comparative study of two series of cases]

INTRODUCTION

Both flunarizine and, more recently, topiramate have proved to be effective in the prophylaxis of migraine.

AIM

To compare two independent groups of patients with similar clinical and demographic characteristics who were treated with flunarizine or topiramate as the preferred drug in the prevention of their migraines and to evaluate effectiveness and safety according to the medication they received.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All the patients reported more than four episodes a month and/or transformed migraine according to Silberstein's criteria, and had never received prophylactic treatment. Data determined: the number and average number of migraines in the previous month and at the fourth month of treatment, and the rate of respondents.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients were included in each group. No significant differences were found between the groups as regards mean age or the average number of migraines in the previous month. With both drugs there was a significant decrease (0.0001) in the mean number of episodes in the fourth month of treatment, but with no significant difference between them: topiramate (5.88 +/- 3.7 to 2.1 +/- 2.5) and flunarizine (5.24 +/- 3.2 to 2.3 +/- 2.7). The mean reduction in the number of migraines at the fourth month was 58.2 +/- 38.2% with topiramate, and 55.4 +/- 37.5% with flunarizine. The respondent rate was 71% with topiramate and 67% with flunarizine. The percentage of dropouts with topiramate (28%) was higher than with flunarizine (11%) (0.0013). With topiramate 69 patients reported side effects and 53 patients reported them with flunarizine (0.0427).

CONCLUSIONS

Both drugs showed a high degree of effectiveness when used as the preferred drug in the preventive treatment of migraine. Topiramate offered better results as far as effectiveness is concerned, but also more side effects, none of which were serious.

[Iatrogenic neurological disorders in old people: a review]

Aged people are frequently the victims of iatrogenic diseases, especially adverse effects of drugs since they are affected by many age-related diseases and are given many drugs. Geriatric medicine in Japan has a bitter history of having produced many victims by adverse effects of cerebral vasodilators and cerebral stimulants; they included parkinsonism and depression induced by flunarizine and cinnarizine, and Reye-like encephalopathy induced by calcium hopantenate. Parkinsonism induced by sulpiride, tiapride, metoclopramide or atypical anti-psychotics, dyskinesia induced by anti-parkinsonian drugs or anti-psychotics, and psychotic symptoms induced by anti-parkinsonian drugs, anti-cholinergic drugs, anti-depressants or histamine H2 antagonists are still very common. Wernicke encephalopathy caused by intravenous glucose infusion without thiamine, central pontine myelinolysis by too rapid correction of hyponatremia are important though infrequent. Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease by dura grafts is a warning against the easy use of medical materials produced with human organs or blood. Iatrogenic diseases are preventable, and geriatricians have to pay attention to the information on adverse effects of drugs and medical materials and carefully observe the early signs of iatrogenic diseases.

Atypical antipsychotic profile of flunarizine in animal models

RATIONALE

Flunarizine is known as a calcium channel blocker commonly used in many countries to treat migraine and vertigo. Parkinsonism has been described as one of its side-effects in the elderly, which is in agreement with its recently characterized moderate D2 receptor antagonism.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a pre-clinical evaluation of flunarizine as a potential antipsychotic.

METHODS

We evaluated the action of orally administered flunarizine in mice against hyperlocomotion induced by amphetamine and dizocilpine (MK-801) as pharmacological models of schizophrenia, induction of catalepsy as a measure for extrapyramidal symptoms and impairment induced by dizocilpine on the delayed alternation task for working memory.

RESULTS

Flunarizine robustly inhibited hyperlocomotion induced by both amphetamine and dizocilpine at doses that do not reduce spontaneous locomotion (3-30 mg/kg). Mild catalepsy was observed at 30 mg/kg, being more pronounced at 50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg. Flunarizine (30 mg/kg) improved dizocilpine-induced impairment on the delayed alternation test.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest a profile comparable to atypical antipsychotics. The low cost, good tolerability and long half-life (over 2 weeks) of flunarizine are possible advantages for its use as an atypical antipsychotic. These results warrant clinical trials with flunarizine for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Parkinsonism and other movement disorders in outpatients in chronic use of cinnarizine and flunarizine

The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence and the patterns of movement disorders (MD) in outpatients submitted to the chronic use of cinnarizine (cz) or flunarizine (fz), and to establish the main risk factors for MD development. Over a period of 3 months, data were collected from outpatients who were chronic users of cz or fz in a municipal health institute. A total of 26 outpatients were included and all of them were submitted to a protocol that included DSM-4 diagnosis criteria for drug-induced movement disorders, parkinsonism (PK) and depression. Parkinsonism was diagnosed in 34% of the patients, PK plus akathisia, PK plus akathisia and bucco-linguo-masticatory syndrome (BLMS), isolated BLMS and dystonia were found in 4% patients each. Patients with BLMS had the highest median age and the longest average period in which they used the drugs. The affected group, when compared to the non-affected one, presented with higher rates of depression. This study demonstrates the existence of a direct relationship between the time of use of cz and fz, the age and the prevalence of PK and other MD. It also suggests that these drugs increase the incidence of depression.

Flunarizine and cinnarizine-induced parkinsonism: a historical and clinical analysis

BACKGROUND

Drug-Induced Parkinsonism (DIP) represents the second leading cause of Parkinsonism (PK) in several countries. Flunarizine and cinnarizine are some of the most common drugs that cause DIP. This paper reviews the first description of Flunarizine and Cinnarizine-Induced Parkinsonism (FCIP), as well as the subsequent literature, emphasizing epidemiological, clinical and diagnostic aspects.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature on the subject, with special emphasis on the first description and the later definition of the clinical syndrome that results from chronic use of flunarizine and cinnarizine.

RESULTS

In 1984, De Melo-Souza reported the first description of flunarizine-induced PK in five patients. Other reports followed on FCIP, emphasizing the clinical features, which are symmetrical parkinsonism, and depression, affecting mainly elderly women.

CONCLUSIONS

Eighteen years after the original description, FCIP is a recognized condition with specific clinical features, and is the second most common cause of parkinsonism in many countries.

Objective evaluation of the effect of flunarizine on vestibular neuritis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether vestibular autorotation tests (VAT) would show significant differences in vestibular oculomotor reflex (VOR) parameters in vertiginous patients before and after treatment with flunarizine.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study in a tertiary referral academic center.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients (10 men, 13 women, mean age 45.57 years, mean length of disease 99.48 days, mean treatment 38.61 days), with vertigo due to vestibular neuritis, underwent VAT testing before and after treatment with 5 mg of flunarizine daily.

RESULTS

The parameter improvement value (IV) resulted from subtracting posttreatment from pretreatment VAT numerical values. Regarding subjective improvement, 3 patients (13%) said they had none, 5 (21.7%) expressed moderate progress, 9 (39.1) considered the results satisfactory, and 6 (26%) became asymptomatic. The VAT results gave high positive IV for horizontal restriction, low positive for horizontal and vertical gains and horizontal asymmetry, and negative IV for horizontal phase and vertical restriction. Regarding the individual frequencies, horizontal and vertical gains improved in all the frequencies tested except one. The horizontal phase improved at low frequencies (2.0 and 2.3 Hz) and deteriorated from 2.7 to 3.9 Hz. Vertical and horizontal restriction showed both improvement and deterioration. Horizontal asymmetry displayed improvement from -0.01 at 2.0 Hz to 0.50 at 5.9 Hz, deteriorating from -0.41 at 9.0 Hz.

CONCLUSIONS

Flunarizine is useful in the treatment of vertigo caused by vestibular neuritis. VAT is a valid instrument for the objective and quantitative evaluation of the vestibular-oculomotor reflexes.

Efficacy and tolerability in migraine prophylaxis of flunarizine in reduced doses: a comparison with propranolol 160 mg daily

This was a phase-IV double-blind equivalence trial designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of flunarizine (10 mg o.d.=FLU 10 mg and 5 mg o.d.=FLU 5 mg) in the prophylaxis of migraine, in comparison with slow-release propranolol (160 mg o.d.). A total of 808 subjects were treated in a treatment period of 16 weeks. 142 subjects discontinued the trial prematurely, mainly because of adverse events (n=58). The mean attack frequency in the double-blind period was 2.0 for the FLU 5 mg group, 1.9 for the FLU 10 mg group, and 1.9 for the propranolol group. The mean attack frequency in the last 28 days of the double-blind period was 1.8 for FLU 5 mg, 1.6 for FLU 10 mg, and 1.7 for propranolol. Both flunarizine groups were at least as effective as propranolol (P<0.001 in one-sided test). The percentage of responders (defined as subjects for whom attack frequency decreased by at least 50% compared to run-in) in the last 28 days of the double-blind period was 46% (118/259) for FLU 5 mg, 53% (141/264) for FLU 10 mg, and 48% (125/258) for propranolol. Statistical analysis showed that FLU 10 mg is at least as effective as propranolol (P<0.001) and showed a trend for noninferiority of FLU5 and propranolol (P=0.053). No statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were found for any of the secondary parameters. Overall, 190 subjects reported one or more adverse events during the run-in phase: 54 (20.5%) in the FLU 5 mg group, 76 (27.7%) in the FLU 10 mg group and 60 (22.3%) in the propranolol group. The results of this equivalence trial show that 10 mg flunarizine daily with a drug-free weekend is at least as effective as 160 mg propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine for all evaluated parameters (one-sided equivalence tests) after 16 weeks of treatment. In addition, 5 mg flunarizine proves to be at least as effective as 160 mg propranolol when looking at the mean attack frequency for both the whole double-blind period and the last 28 days of treatment. However, in the analysis of responders, 160 mg propranolol seems to be slightly better than 5 mg flunarizine. In addition, no significant differences between the three treatments were found with regard to safety: all three treatments were generally well-tolerated and safe.

Long-term effect of flunarizine on patients with alternating hemiplegia of childhood in Japan

To determine the effect of flunarizine therapy on patients with alternating hemiplegia of childhood (AHC), we sent a questionnaire by mail to council members of the Japanese Society of Child Neurology. We collected 28 AHC patients, and studied their clinical courses and the effects of drug therapy. All of the patients had received flunarizine. In 18 of the 28 patients, flunarizine reduced the severity, duration, or frequency of the hemiplegic attacks. No other drug was more effective than flunarizine. Some flunarizine non-effective patients were severely deteriorated, for example, they had dementia or were ventilator-assisted. Flunarizine had not only a short-term effect, i.e. it reduced the hemiplegic attacks, but also a long-term effect on the motor and intellectual development in some patients with AHC. Flunarizine is still an essential drug for treating AHC.

Successful combination therapy--flunarizine, pentoxifylline, and cholestyramine--for spur cell anemia

Spur cell anemia, a hemolytic anemia observed in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis, is characterized by unusual erythrocyte morphology and an increased ratio of free cholesterol to phospholipid in the erythrocyte membrane. The prognosis of spur cell anemia is usually extremely poor, however, we describe here a patient with spur cell anemia who was successfully treated with combination therapy consisting of flunarizine, pentoxifylline, and cholestyramine. Initial therapy with flunarizine alone for 6 weeks did not significantly decrease the number of spur cells on peripheral blood smears. So pentoxifylline was added to the regimen. The patient recovered from the anemia, showed remarkable improvement with regard to the hyperbilirubinemia, and the changes were accompanied by a significant decrease in the number of spur cells in peripheral blood smears. To correct the hypercholesterolemia, cholestyramine was added to the regimen, which resulted in a reduction in the serum level of free cholesterol and an increase in the molar ratio of free cholesterol to phospholipid in erythrocyte membrane. However, 6 months later a skin eruption developed that was considered an adverse reaction to the drugs, so the flunarizine and pentoxifylline were discontinued. With cholestyramine therapy alone, the remission of spur cell anemia was maintained for more than 11 months. These observations suggest that non-invasive combination therapy with flunarizine, pentoxifylline, and cholestyramine is effective and valuable in the treatment of patients with spur cell anemia.

Alpha-dihydroergocryptine in the prophylaxis of migraine: a multicenter double-blind study versus flunarizine

This multicenter, double-blind, clinical study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of alpha-dihydroergocryptine and flunarizine in the prophylaxis of migraine without aura. One hundred thirty-five patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society were enrolled at five neurologic centers. The study design included a 1-month pretreatment phase with placebo; a 6-month, double-blind, double-dummy treatment phase with alpha-dihydroergocryptine (10 mg twice daily) or flunarizine (5 mg once daily); a further 3-month follow-up phase without treatment. Efficacy was assessed using the patient's diary. Laboratory tests, vital signs, and adverse events were monitored. Analysis of covariance for repeated measures was performed on the intent-to-treat sample. Both treatments led to a significant reduction in the frequency of migraine, days with headache, and use of relief medication. Overall, 51% of those treated with alpha-dihydroergocryptine and 49% of those treated with flunarizine were responders (50% or greater reduction in attack frequency), the average percentage of reduction being 64% with alpha-dihydroergocryptine and 51% with flunarizine. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of incidence of adverse events; dizziness and weight gain were the most frequent observed adverse events with alpha-dihydroergocryptine and flunarizine, respectively. Based on the overall improvement in migraine parameters, alpha-dihydroergocryptine can be recommended for use in migraine prophylaxis.

Transcranial Doppler evaluation of cerebral hemodynamics in migraineurs during prophylactic treatment with flunarizine

Transcranial Doppler (TCD) recording was used to evaluate the mean flow velocity (MFV) and cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 in 21 migraineurs during the interictal phase. Nine were affected by migraine with aura (MwA) and 12 by migraine without aura (MwoA). During each session the middle cerebral artery (MCA) flow velocity was examined in basal conditions, in hypocapnia after a 3-min period of hyperventilation, in basal conditions a second time, and in hypercapnia after breath-holding. The same procedure was followed in a group of 21 age- and sex-matched volunteers. Recordings were performed before (T1), during (T2), and after (T3) prophylactic treatment with flunarizine (10 mg/day for 2 months) to assess the possible effect of this drug on cerebral hemodynamics. In basal condition, increased MFV values were found in both MwA and MwoA patients. In MwA patients the reactivity index (RI) to hypocapnia was significantly increased in T1 (p < 0.05). This abnormal cerebrovascular reactivity disappeared during flunarizine treatment (T2) and in the post-therapy period (T3).

[Vascular brain damage: an important and recognizable cause of cognitive and behavioral disorders]

Four patients presented symptoms of a dementia syndrome. A man aged 67 showed gradual aggravation of disorders of memory and gait, as well as subcortical infarctions. A man aged 65 had disorders of concentration non compatible with the infarctions on the MRI scan, which disappeared after discontinuation of use of flunarizine. A woman aged 55 and a man aged 52 had changes of character and infarctions in the frontal lobe. Vascular dementia is, contrary to what most criteria suggest, often a subcortical syndrome. The relationship between cerebrovascular pathology on CT and MRI scans and cognitive and behavioural disorders is often hard to establish. If the criteria for vascular dementia are applied blindly, other causes of the subcortical dementia syndrome can be missed. The present criteria offer almost no room for detecting the subtle cognitive and behavioural disorders of cerebrovascular pathology. It is important to recognize the early changes of a threatened brain, because treatment and prevention might be effective in preventing further damage.

Etiology of parkinsonism in a Brazilian movement disorders clinic

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to investigate whether there are geographic differences in the etiology of parkinsonism (PA).

BACKGROUND

72% of patients with PA evaluated at movement disorders clinics in the Northern Hemisphere are diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (PD). Data regarding other regions are not available.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of all patients with PA seen at the Federal University of Minas Gerais Movement Disorders Clinic from July 1993 through October 1995. PA was diagnosed by the presence of at least two of the following: rest tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and postural instability. The different etiologies were diagnosed based on standard clinical criteria.

RESULTS

During the period of the study, PA was recognized in 338 subjects. The following clinical diagnoses were made: PD (68.9%), drug-induced PA (DIP) (13.3%), vascular PA (4.7%), Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) (2%), multiple system atrophy (MSA) (1.8%), others (9.7%). Cinnarizine, haloperidol and flunarizine were the commonest drugs related to DIP.

CONCLUSIONS

Similarly to other studies, PD accounts for about 70% of PA patients. However, there are differences between our results and previous series. DIP is much more common in the present series. This may be accounted for a more liberal use of antidopaminergic drugs in our environment, especially Calcium channel blockers. The lower frequency of MSA and PSP in our study may reflect a short follow-up, since many patients initially diagnosed with PD later are found to have Parkinson-plus syndromes.

Catalepsy induced by calcium channel blockers in mice

It is known that calcium channel blockers induce Parkinsonism. In this study, amlodipine-, diltiazem-, and verapamil-induced catalepsy was investigated in mice. All of these three calcium channel blockers induced catalepsy. Dopamine D1, D2, and mACh receptor occupancies were estimated under the same conditions, and the affinities of these drugs for each receptor were also estimated in vitro. Intensity of catalepsy was predicted by dopamine D1, D2, and mACh receptor occupancies with the dynamic model which had already been constructed and was compared with the observed values. The predicted and the observed values were comparable (r = 0.98, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the dynamic model considering D1, and D2, and mACh receptor occupancy may be useful for quantitative prediction of drug-induced catalepsy.

A postmarketing study of flunarizine in migraine and vertigo

This prospective, open multi-centre study on flunarizine focused on the risk/benefit ratio of the use of flunarizine in the prophylaxis of migraine and in the treatment of vertigo, due to disorder of the vestibular system. The assessment of risks focused on the incidence of new events of depression and/or extrapyramidal syndrome during flunarizine treatment. For migraine, flunarizine was compared to propranolol in 686 patients; for vertigo, flunarizine was compared to betahistine in 198 patients. The incidence of depression during follow-up in this study was significantly higher in the flunarizine group than in the propranolol group in the condition of migraine. There were no observations of an extrapyramidal syndrome. There was a suggestion that flunarizine has more benefits than propranolol in the condition of migraine, and that betahistine has more benefit than flunarizine in the condition of vertigo. Differences in dosages could possible explain these differences.

Valproate versus flunarizine in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized, double-open, clinical trial

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of valproate versus flunarizine in migraine prophylaxis in a randomized double-open clinical trial. Twenty-two migraine sufferers were treated with valproate (1 g per day) for 8 weeks; a parallel group of 22 migraine sufferers was treated with flunarizine (10 mg per day). The main admission criterion was a minimum of 3 migraine (with, or without aura) attacks per month. The major clinical parameters evaluated were the frequency of headache attacks, the frequency of use of drugs for the acute management of migraine, the patients' opinion of treatment and the Hamilton anxiety and depression rating scales. During the study 3 patients dropped out (1 from the valproate and 2 from the flunarizine groups). Fifteen patients (71.4%) from the valproate group responded to therapy, compared to 14 patients (65%) from the flunarizine group. In the valproate group 12 patients (57.1%) reported various side effects (prevalently gastric symptoms) versus 10 patients (47.6%) in the flunarizine group (prevalently somnolence). The patients who were treated with flunarizine showed an increase in the mean score of the 21-item Hamilton rating scale for depression, but the difference was not significant; morning dysthymia however, was significantly more often observed in the flunarizine patients, compared to the valproate patients. These results suggest that both drugs are effective and safe in migraine prophylaxis.

A long-term follow-up study of cinnarizine- and flunarizine-induced parkinsonism

The natural course of calcium-entry blocker-induced parkinsonism was evaluated in 13 elderly patients previously exposed to cinnarizine or flunarizine or both for a median period of 7 months. Clinical assessments were carried out before drug discontinuation and twice thereafter over a period lasting < or = 7 years. None of the patients showed a full recovery of extrapyramidal signs, indicating that the long-term prognosis of the parkinsonism is less benign than previously reported. Two main patterns of clinical outcome were recognized (i.e., "remittent" and "persistent and not progressive" parkinsonism), whereas the development of a progressive disorder was observed only in one patient. No significant correlation was found between the patterns of outcome and some clinical variables, such as total duration of exposure to cinnarizine and flunarizine, cumulative drug dosages, and age at onset of parkinsonism. There was no significant difference in terms of family history of essential tremor or parkinsonism or both among patients with the two main patterns of clinical course.

Postmarketing study of the use of flunarizine in vestibular vertigo and in migraine

OBJECTIVE

This international postmarketing observational study of flunarizine was designed to evaluate, in routine clinical practice, the risk/benefit ratio of flunarizine in its approved indications, namely prophylaxis of migraine and treatment of vertigo. Comparator drugs were propranolol in migraine and betahistine in vertigo. The study was carried out by 498 general practitioners in Belgium, The Netherlands and Germany, whose participation had been requested by mail. In total 3186 patients were entered: 1601 in the two migraine cohorts and 1585 in the two vertigo cohorts.

RESULTS

In the migraine study, treatment results with propranolol tended to be somewhat better than those with flunarizine, but a selection bias cannot be excluded. There was no clear difference regarding efficacy between flunarizine and betahistine in the vertigo study. The safety evaluation focused on extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and depression. Overall, EPS were noted in only four patients, two in the vertigo-betahistine and two in the migraine-flunarizine cohort. A total of 70 patients developed depressive symptoms (34 in the flunarizine and 24 in the propranolol migraine cohorts, but only 7 in the flunarizine and 5 in the betahistine vertigo cohorts). Patients with migraine were clearly more prone to depression than patients with vertigo, regardless of their treatment. Additional risk factors for depression were a history of depression, and, in the migraine flunarizine cohort, a high number of previous migraine treatments.

Post-marketing cohort study comparing the safety and efficacy of flunarizine and propranolol in the prophylaxis of migraine

A comparative post-marketing surveillance study of the safety and efficacy of flunarizine and propranolol in the treatment of migraine was carried out. General practitioners in Belgium and the Netherlands each recruited patients for whom they would prescribe one of the study medications in the normal course of their treatment and recorded all medical events on follow-up forms for up to 8 months. A total of 1601 migraine patients were enrolled; 838 in the flunarizine cohort and 763 in the propranolol cohort. Propranolol was somewhat better than flunarizine in reducing the severity of migraine attacks, although this may have been due to a selection bias. Discontinuations of therapy due to events considered likely to be treatment-related were mostly due to the recognized side effects of the two drugs. As regards the occurrence of depressions, a total of 58 patients had depressive events, 34 in the flunarizine cohort and 24 in the propranolol cohort. Whereas migraine itself appears to be associated with an increased risk of depression, the number of previous migraine treatments was shown to be an additional risk factor for the development of depression in patients receiving flunarizine as was a history of depression. Overall, there was no appreciable difference in the risk/benefit ratio between flunarizine and propranolol.

Flunarizine in stroke treatment (FIST): a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Scandinavia and the Netherlands

INTRODUCTION

An international, multicenter trial was conducted in 331 patients to determine the effect of a large dose of flunarizine (a calcium entry blocker) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the territory of the Middle cerebral artery.

METHODS

The administration of the trial medication should start within 24 h after the initial symptoms of stroke. According to a random schedule, the patients were assigned to a 4-weeks double-blind treatment with either flunarizine (n = 166) or placebo (n = 165): one week intravenous administration (50 mg daily), followed by 3 weeks oral treatment (week 2, 21 mg daily; week 3-4, 7 mg daily). All patients had to be investigated by computerized tomography (CT) within 7 days after stroke onset; 36 patients were secundarily excluded because the CT showed another pathology. During the treatment period, other "stroke therapies" were not allowed. Patients were followed up for 24 weeks.

RESULTS

After the 24 weeks trial period, the percentage of patients who were dead or pendent (modified Rankin score 3-5) was similar in both treatment groups (flunarizine 67%, placebo 65%). During the trial, the scores for handicap severity (modified Rankin scale), neurological status (Orgogozo) and activities of daily living (modified Barthel index) strongly improved in both treatment groups, but no differences were found between the treatment groups. In this trial, the administration of trial treatment started relatively late after stroke onset (flunarizine group: mean time interval 13.5 h; placebo 12.3 h). A subgroup of patients received trial medication within 6 h after stroke onset (flunarizine n = 31; placebo n = 29). Also in this subgroup, no differences were found between the flunarizine and placebo group.

CONCLUSION

Flunarizine did not improve neurologic and functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Rising dose study of safety and tolerance of flunarizine

In a recent NIH-sponsored parallel-group placebo-controlled blinded study of flunarizine for the treatment of partial-onset seizures, the flunarizine serum concentration was controlled to a constant level among patients in order to reduce response variability. Flunarizine was found to exhibit modest anti-epileptic efficacy. A potential criticism of this study is that the chosen controlled concentration was too low to determine optimal efficacy. As a participating center in this study we investigated the effect of higher doses of open-label flunarizine on seizure frequency in 16 patients with refractory partial seizures. Following the completion of the blinded placebo/flunarizine phase, all patients were initiated at the flunarizine dose calculated to result in a serum concentration of 60 ng.ml-1. The dose was subsequently increased each 8-12 weeks to a maximum of 2.7 times the initial dose. On the initial maintenance flunarizine dose, seizure control was improved, with an average seizure reduction of 47% compared to pre-blinded-phase baseline. When higher doses were administered, adverse reactions were more common yet improved seizure control did not occur in most patients. These findings complement those of the concentration-controlled NIH study and suggest that appropriate flunarizine doses were utilized in that study.

Flunarizine of limited value in children with intractable epilepsy

Fourteen ambulatory children and adolescents with intractable epilepsy were studied in an open phase II study to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of flunarizine as an add-on treatment. Flunarizine was given in increasing doses starting with 0.1-0.3 mg/kg/day until effect was observed or a steady-state plasma concentration of 50-60 ng/ml was reached. Treatment was continued for 3 months at steady state. Pharmacokinetics were determined during the immediate posttreatment period. Positive antiepileptic effect (> or = 50% reduction in seizure frequency) was observed in 4 of 14 patients (29%; 95% CI: 52-5). Independently of antiepileptic effect, 10 of 14 parents (71.4%; 95% CI: 95-48) observed positive cognitive effects. In all patients treatment was withdrawn due to either lack of effect or weight gain. Flunarizine was rapidly absorbed; mean time of peak concentration (Tmax) was 2.7 hours (range: 1-8). The mean terminal half-life was 23.2 days (range: 7-48), the total plasma clearance of flunarizine per fraction of the dose absorbed (CLp/F) was 0.28 ml/min/kg (range: 0.07-042), and the volume of distribution of flunarizine per fraction of the dose absorbed (Vd/F) was 187 L/kg (range: 99-348). We conclude that flunarizine (0.1-0.3 mg/kg/day) seems to be of limited antiepileptic value in children with intractable epilepsy. The pharmacokinetic profile of flunarizine complicates its clinical use.

D2 receptor blockade by flunarizine and cinnarizine explains extrapyramidal side effects. A SPECT study

Twenty-six patients under treatment with the calcium channel blockers flunarizine (Fz) or cinnarizine (Cz) were examined-with single-photon emission computed tomography using [123I]iodobenzamide as a ligand. The striatal dopamine D2 receptor-binding potential was determined and found to be reduced by 14 to 63% (39.5 +/- 15.0%; p < 0.0001) in patients compared with age-matched control values. This reduction was larger in 12 patients with extrapyramidal symptoms and was only slowly reversible after discontinuation of treatment. Patients treated for > 6 months had significantly larger reductions than patients treated for a shorter period. Parkinsonian symptoms were only seen in patients older than 50 years. Our findings prove a neuroleptic-like action of Fz and Cz, which seems to be the major reason for their extrapyramidal side effects. Older age and long-term treatment are predisposing factors for these effects.

Extrapyramidal symptoms associated with calcium-channel blockers

Flunarizine and cinnarizine have been well documented to cause EPS. Other CCBs, on rare occasions, also have been reported to cause EPS. Theoretical explanations for these events include the inhibition of calcium influx into striatal cells and direct dopaminergic antagonistic properties. In addition, the chemical structures of flunarizine and cinnarizine, which are related to neuroleptics, may explain the relatively greater incidence of EPS with these agents. Suggested risk factors for acquiring EPS with flunarizine or cinnarizine use appear to be age, although experience with using these agents in younger patients is limited, and a family history of tremors and/or Parkinson's disease. The onset and type of presentation is unpredictable and, in most instances, discontinuation of the medication relieves the symptoms within a few days to months. Pharmacologic management of EPS with continued use of the offending agent generally has not been of clinical benefit. In conclusion, patients receiving CCBs, particularly flunarizine and cinnarizine, should be monitored for EPS.

Flunarizine for treatment of partial seizures: results of a concentration-controlled trial

The National Institutes of Health sponsored a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of flunarizine (FNR) in epileptic patients receiving concomitant phenytoin (PHT) or carbamazepine (CBZ). Because of FNR's long half-life (up to 7 weeks), a parallel rather than crossover design was used. Each patient received an individualized loading dose and maintenance dosage targeted at a 60-ng/ml plasma FNR concentration. Of 93 patients randomized, 92 provided seizure data for the full 25-week treatment period; one placebo-treated patient dropped out for personal reasons. Fifty-four patients received CBZ only, nine received PHT only, and 30 received both CBZ and PHT. Eighty-seven patients had a history of complex partial seizures, and 60 had secondarily generalized seizures. Eight patients discontinued FNR prematurely, all because of adverse neurologic or psychiatric signs or symptoms; depression was the specific cause in three cases. Calculated maintenance dosages, based on single-dose pharmacokinetic profiles, ranged from 7 to 138 mg/day (mean, 40 mg/day). Plasma FNR concentrations generally exceeded the target, with the highest concentrations observed immediately after loading; excluding the first three treatment weeks and all concentrations after a FNR dosage change, the median plasma FNR concentration was 71.7 ng/ml. The percent reduction from baseline seizure rate was statistically greater (p = 0.002) in the FNR-treated group (mean, 24.4%) than in the placebo-treated group (mean, 5.7%).

Dopamine D2 receptor blockade and antimigraine action of flunarizine

We studied in vivo the influence of flunarizine on dopamine D2 receptors and investigated whether dopamine D2 receptor blockade is involved in its antimigraine action. Eleven migraine patients, treated with flunarizine, 10 mg per day, underwent single photon emission computer tomography (SPECT) using [123I] labeled iodobenzamide, a ligand with high affinity and high specificity for D2 receptors. There was a reduction of the dopamine D2 receptor binding potential in all patients compared to age-matched controls. The efficacy of flunarizine in migraine prophylaxis failed to correlate with the degree of the dopamine D2 receptor blockade. The antimigraine action of flunarizine may not involve antidopaminergic mechanisms.

[Parkinson disease induced by flunarizine: report of a case]

The authors report the case of a female patient with parkinsonism induced by flunarizine, and refer the tremor to be of parkinsonian and also of wilsonian type. Cure was observed within three months, after withdrawal of flunarizine, and the use of L-dopa and biperiden.

Flunarizine in essential tremor

We studied the effects of flunarizine (Fz) in 10 patients with moderate to severe essential tremor. Tremor was evaluated after 6 weeks of treatment using patient and physician assessment as well as blinded video analysis. Only one patient had mild subjective transient improvement and three experienced worsening of tremor. No patient elected to remain on Fz. We conclude that Fz is ineffective for moderate to severe essential tremor and may actually worsen the symptoms in some patients.

Low dose flunarizine in the prophylaxis of migraine

In a period of one year (1990) we selected 40 patients suffering from migraine. For an open randomized study there were 2 groups of patients: the first were treated with 10mg of flunarizine per day and the second with 3 mg per day. The patients were treated for 4 months consecutively. There were 11 drop outs (27.5%): nine for poor compliance and 2 due to side effects. The efficacy of flunarizine in the prophylaxis of migraine was essentially identical in the two dosage groups while the incidence of side effects was considerably reduced in the patients treated with the lower dose.