Susceptibility to Fosfomycin and Nitrofurantoin of ESBL-Positive Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated From Urine of Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Pediatric urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive gram-negative bacilli (GNB) has limited options for oral antibiotic treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the susceptibility of ESBL-positive Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from pediatric urine samples to two oral antibiotics (fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin).

METHODS

From November 2020 to April 2022, ESBL-positive E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates from urine samples were collected at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Patients over 18 years of age or with malignancy were excluded. For repeated isolates from the same patient, only the first isolate was tested. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were measured using agar (fosfomycin) or broth (nitrofurantoin) dilution methods. MIC50 and MIC90 were measured for fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin in both E. coli and K. pneumoniae.

RESULTS

There were 117 isolates from 117 patients, with a median age of 7 months (range, 0.0-18.5 years). Among 117 isolates, 92.3% (108/117) were E. coli and 7.7% (9/117) were K. pneumoniae. Isolates from the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and general ward (GW) was 11.1% (13/117) and 88.9% (104/117), respectively. Among 108 E. coli isolates, MIC50 and MIC90 for fosfomycin were 0.5 μg/mL and 2 μg/mL, respectively. Fosfomycin susceptibility rate was 97.2% (105/108) with a breakpoint of 128 μg/mL. Fosfomycin susceptibility rate was significantly lower in PICU isolates than in GW isolates (81.8% vs. 99.0%, P = 0.027). For nitrofurantoin, both the MIC50 and MIC90 were 16 μg/mL. Nitrofurantoin susceptibility rate was 96.3% (104/108) with a breakpoint of 64 μg/mL based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Among the nine K. pneumoniae isolates, the MIC50 and MIC90 for fosfomycin was 2 μg/mL and 32 μg/mL, respectively. MIC50 and MIC90 for nitrofurantoin were 64 μg/mL and 128 μg/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For uncomplicated UTI caused by ESBL-positive GNB in Korean children, treatment with fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin for E. coli infections can be considered as an effective oral therapy option.

[Optimization of prevention of infectious complications during prostate biopsy]

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignant neoplasms in middle-aged and elderly men. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is the standard method for diagnosing prostate cancer but is associated with a high incidence of infectious compli-cations. A review of the literature on optimizing the prevention of infectious complications when performing transrectal prostate biopsy is presented. The main risk factors and the common measures to prevent the development of complications are discussed, including a study of using fosfomycin trometamol as the preferred drug for antibacterial prophylaxis. Fosfomycin meets the requirements for empirical prophylaxis, but further clinical studies are needed.

Rediscovering the value of fosfomycin trometamol in the era of antimicrobial resistance: A systematic review and expert opinion

The worldwide prevalence of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections (uUTIs) caused by multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli is increasing. To address this emergency, international guidelines recommend reducing administration of fluoroquinolones, in the context of growing resistance and the long-lasting and potentially disabling side effects of these drugs. The favoured drug to replace fluoroquinolones is fosfomycin trometamol (FT), a well-known derivate of phosphonic acid with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recently reduced the susceptibility breakpoint for E. coli from 32 mg/L to 8 mg/L regarding FT used for uUTIs. This might lead to increased appropriate use of oral fosfomycin target therapy against E. coli and other microorganisms, and may be associated with a high likelihood of success. For species such as Klebsiella spp, particularly MDR strains, the absence of clinical breakpoints might lead to reduced use of oral fosfomycin, particularly if minimum inhibitory concentration is not available. To address this issue, this review presents an overview of the preclinical evidence on the activity of FT, and a systematic review of the clinical activity of FT in uUTIs in women, and in the prevention of infectious complications after prostate biopsy. The findings indicate that the safety and microbiological and clinical effectiveness of a single oral dose of FT are similar to that for comparator regimens with longer treatment schedules in women with uUTI, and FT can be considered a viable alternative to fluoroquinolones for antimicrobial prophylaxis in prostate biopsy. These observations and a broad clinical experience support the empirical use of FT for treating uUTI and indicate that FT is a promising candidate to effectively counteract antibiotic-resistant uUTIs throughout Europe.

Efficacy of antibiotic combinations in an experimental sepsis model with Pseudomonas aeruginosa

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of fosfomycin, colistin, tobramycin and their dual combinations in an experimental sepsis model. After sepsis was established with a Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate (P1), antibiotic-administered rats were divided into six groups: Fosfomycin, tobramycin, colistin and their dual combinations were administered by the intravenous or intraperitoneal route to the groups. The brain, heart, lung, liver, spleen and kidney tissues of rats were cultured to investigate bacterial translocation caused by P1. Given the antibiotics and their combinations, bacterial colony counts in liver tissues were decreased in colistin alone and colistin plus tobramycin groups compared with control group, but there were no significant differences. In addition, a non-statistical decrease was found in the spleen tissues of rats in the colistin plus tobramycin group. There was a > 2 log10 CFU/ml decrease in the number of bacterial colonies in the kidney tissues of the rats in the fosfomycin group alone, but the decrease was not statistically significant. However, there was an increase in the number of bacterial colonies in the spleen and kidney samples in the group treated with colistin as monotherapy compared to the control group. The number of bacterial colonies in the spleen samples in fosfomycin plus tobramycin groups increased compared to the control group. Bacterial colony numbers in all tissue samples in the fosfomycin plus colistin group were found to be close to those in the control group. Colistin plus tobramycin combinations are effective against P. aeruginosa in experimental sepsis, and clinical success may be achieved. New in vivo studies demonstrating the ability of P. aeruginosa to biofilm formation in tissues other than the lung are warranted in future.

Antibiotic Resistance Patterns Among Uropathogens in Female Outpatients Affected by Uncomplicated Cystitis: Focus on Fosfomycin Trometamol

OBJECTIVES

To report the resistance rate against fosfomycin trometamol among outpatient women with symptoms related to urinary tract infections over a 6-year period in a multicentre, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Urinary samples were collected from three high-volume laboratories from January 2015 to December 2020. The pattern of resistance to fosfomycin was analysed by using the Vitek II automated system.

RESULTS

A total of 7289 urinary samples were collected and 8321 strains were analysed during the study period. The most commonly isolated uropathogen was Escherichia coli (n = 6583, 79.1%). The mean resistance rate against fosfomycin was 9.7% (range 7.1-11.3). No statistically significant difference was found between the three laboratories (P = 0.53). There was no significant increase in resistance rate during the study period. The mean resistance rate against fosfomycin was higher among extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria when compared with non-ESBL-producing strains (10.8% vs. 7.9%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Uropathogens isolated from women affected by cystitis remained highly susceptible to fosfomycin. These findings confirm recommendations in international guidelines that advocate fosfomycin trometamol for empirical treatment of uncomplicated cystitis in women.

The efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell treatment and colistin-fosfomycin combination on colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii sepsis model

INTRODUCTION

This study examines the role of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in an experimental sepsis model developed with colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

BALB-c mice were divided into treatment groups (MSC, MSC + colistin (C)-fosfomycin (F), and C-F and control groups (positive and negative)). CRAB was administered to mice through intraperitoneal injection. Three hours later, C, F, and MSC were given intraperitoneally to the treatment groups. Colistin administration was repeated every 12 h, F administration was done every 4 h, and the second dose of MSC was administered after 48 h. Mice were sacrificed at 24 and 72 h. The bacterial load was determined as colony-forming units per gram (cfu/g). Histopathological examination was conducted on the left lung, liver, and both kidneys. IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in mouse sera were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Among the treatment groups, the C-F group had the lowest colony count in the lung (1.24 ± 1.66 cfu/g) and liver (1.03 ± 1.08 cfu/g). The highest bacterial clearance was observed at 72 h compared to 24 h in the MSC-treated groups (p = 0.008). The MSC + C-F group showed the lowest histopathological score in the liver and kidney (p = 0.009). In the negative control group, the IL-6 level at the 24th hour was the lowest (p < 0.001). Among the treatment groups, the CRP level was the lowest in the MSC + C-F group at 24 and 72 h.

CONCLUSION

In a CRAB sepsis model, adding MSCs to a colistin-fosfomycin treatment may be beneficial in terms of reducing bacterial loads and preventing histopathological damage.

Daily fosfomycin versus levofloxacin for complicated urinary tract infections

IMPORTANCE

Concerns over resistance and safety have been identified in the current treatment regimen for complicated urinary tract infections. Fosfomycin is a drug that is routinely used for the treatment of uncomplicated cystitis. This study shows that fosfomycin could be an oral alternative as step-down therapy for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, with a clinical cure rate comparable to levofloxacin but a lower microbiological success rate 3 weeks from start of antibiotics.

FOVOCIP study: a multicenter randomized trial of fosfomycin versus ciprofloxacin for febrile neutropenia in hematologic patients-efficacy and microbiologic safety

BACKGROUND

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (MRGNB) infections represent a major public health threat. Cancer patients and, among them, hematological patients are most vulnerable to these infections. Gut colonization by MRGNB is a common phenomenon occurring during hospitalization and chemotherapy exposure. In the neutropenic phase that occurs after chemotherapy, MRGNB translocation occurs increasing patient's mortality. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin efficacy is now being questioned due to the increase of incidence in MRGNB.

METHODS

A phase III randomized, controlled, clinical trial, open-label parallel-group with a 1:1 ratio, aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of oral fosfomycin versus oral ciprofloxacin for febrile neutropenia prevention in patients with acute leukemia (AL) or hematopoietic cell transplant (HSC) receptors. Weekly surveillance cultures are planned to detect gut colonization. Changes in fecal microbiome at the beginning and end of prophylaxis will also be analyzed.

DISCUSSION

This trial will provide evidence of the efficacy of an alternative drug to ciprofloxacin for febrile neutropenia prevention in high-risk hematological patients. The battery of planned microbiological studies will allow us to evaluate prospectively the microbiological safety of both pharmacological strategies in terms of the selection of MRGNB occurring in each arm. In addition, valuable information on the way in which each drug changes the fecal microbiome of the patients throughout the treatment will be generated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trials NCT05311254, Registered on 5 April 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05311254?term=FOVOCIP&cntry=ES&draw=2&rank=1 .

PROTOCOL VERSION

3.0, dated 20 May 2022.

Population pharmacokinetic modeling of multiple-dose intravenous fosfomycin in critically ill patients during continuous venovenous hemodialysis

The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of multiple-dose intravenous (i.v.) fosfomycin in critically ill patients during continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). Non-compartmental analysis and population pharmacokinetic modeling were used to simulate different dosing regimens. We evaluated 15 critically ill patients with renal insufficiency and CVVHD undergoing anti-infective treatment with fosfomycin in our ICU. Five grams of fosfomycin were administered for 120 min every 6 h. Plasma concentrations were determined with and without CVVHD. Pharmacokinetic analysis and simulations were performed using non-linear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM). A two-compartment model with renal and dialysis clearance was most accurate in describing the pharmacokinetics of i.v. fosfomycin during CVVHD. Population parameter estimates were 18.20 L and 20.80 L for the central and peripheral compartment volumes, and 0.26 L/h and 5.08 L/h for renal and intercompartmental clearance, respectively. Urinary creatinine clearance (CLCR) represented a considerable component of renal clearance. Central compartment volume increased over time after the first dose. For patients with CLCR > 50 (90) mL/min and CVVHD, dosage should be increased to ≥ 15 (16) grams of i.v. fosfomycin across three (four) daily doses. Individual CLCR must be considered when dosing i.v. fosfomycin in critically ill patients during CVVHD.

Effectiveness of implementing a locally-developed guideline for antibiotic treatment of lower urinary tract infection in adults in Thailand

Lower urinary tract infection (UTI) is still a major concern in clinical practice, but inappropriate antibiotics are commonly prescribed in Thailand. This study aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for antibiotic treatment of lower UTI in adults at Siriraj Hospital which is a university hospital in Thailand. This study comprised a retrospective cohort study development phase, and a prospective cohort study implementation phase. The outcomes of treatment were compared between phases. The development and implementation phases enrolled 220 and 151 patients, respectively. The CPG compliance rate was significantly increased from 17.3% during the development phase to 43.0% during the implementation phase (p = 0.001). The rates of fluoroquinolones and cotrimoxazole use were significantly lower during implementation than during development (p < 0.001 and p = 0.027, respectively). The rates of nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin use were significantly greater during implementation than during development (p = 0.009 and p = 0.005, respectively). The overall cure rate was not significantly different between the two study phases, but implementation group patients had significantly more unfavorable prognostic factors than development phase patients. CPG-compliance group patients had a significantly higher cure rate than CPG-non-compliance group patients (p = 0.011). The cost of the initial course of antibiotics per episode was significantly higher during the implementation phase because the cost of fosfomycin is more expensive and more fosfomycin was prescribed during implementation (p = 0.047). Implementation of the locally-developed CPG was found to be effective for increasing the appropriate use of empirical antibiotics and increasing the cure rate; however, measures to improve and reinforce CPG compliance are needed.

Priorities and Progress in Gram-negative Bacterial Infection Research by the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group

Addressing the treatment and prevention of antibacterial-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections is a priority area of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG). The ARLG has conducted a series of observational studies to define the clinical and molecular global epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant and ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, with the goal of optimizing the design and execution of interventional studies. One ongoing ARLG study aims to better understand the impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative gut bacteria in neutropenic patients, which threatens to undermine the effectiveness of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in these vulnerable patients. The ARLG has conducted pharmacokinetic studies to inform the optimal dosing of antibiotics that are important in the treatment of drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria, including oral fosfomycin, intravenous minocycline, and a combination of intravenous ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam. In addition, randomized clinical trials have assessed the safety and efficacy of step-down oral fosfomycin for complicated urinary tract infections and single-dose intravenous phage therapy for adult patients with cystic fibrosis who are chronically colonized with P. aeruginosa in their respiratory tract. Thus, the focus of investigation in the ARLG has evolved from improving understanding of drug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections to positively affecting clinical care for affected patients through a combination of interventional pharmacokinetic and clinical studies, a focus that will be maintained moving forward.

Evaluation of the combination treatments with intravenous fosfomycin for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the combination treatments with intravenous fosfomycin for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in a tertiary-care center.

METHODS

Between December 24, 2018 and November 21, 2022, adult patients diagnosed with bloodstream infection or ventilator-associated pneumonia due to culture-confirmed carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in the anesthesiology and reanimation intensive care units were investigated retrospectively.

RESULTS

There were a total of 62 patients fulfilling the study inclusion criteria. No significant difference was recorded in 14- and 30-day mortality among different types of combination regimens such as fosfomycin plus one or two antibiotic combinations. Hypokalemia (OR:5.651, 95%CI 1.019-31.330, p=0.048) was found to be a significant risk factor for 14-day mortality, whereas SOFA score at the time of diagnosis (OR:1.497, 95%CI 1.103-2.032, p=0.010) and CVVHF treatment (OR:6.409, 95%CI 1.395-29.433, p=0.017) were associated with 30-day mortality in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

In our study, high mortality rates were found in patients with bloodstream infection or ventilator-associated pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, and no significant difference was recorded in 14- and 30-day mortality among different types of combination regimens such as fosfomycin plus one or two antibiotic combinations.

Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a randomized trial

Treatment failure occurs in about 25% of patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. We assessed whether cloxacillin plus fosfomycin achieves better treatment success than cloxacillin alone in hospitalized adults with MSSA bacteremia. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase III-IV superiority randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive 2 g of intravenous cloxacillin alone every 4 h or with 3 g of intravenous fosfomycin every 6 h for the initial 7 days. The primary endpoint was treatment success at day 7, a composite endpoint with the following criteria: patient alive, stable or with improved quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, afebrile and with negative blood cultures for MSSA, adjudicated by an independent committee blinded to treatment allocation. We randomized 215 patients, of whom 105 received cloxacillin plus fosfomycin and 110 received cloxacillin alone. We analyzed the primary endpoint with the intention-to-treat approach in 214 patients who received at least 1 day of treatment. Treatment success at day 7 after randomization was achieved in 83 (79.8%) of 104 patients receiving combination treatment versus 82 (74.5%) of 110 patients receiving monotherapy (risk difference 5.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -5.95-16.48). Secondary endpoints, including mortality and adverse events, were similar in the two groups except for persistent bacteremia at day 3, which was less common in the combination arm. In a prespecified interim analysis, the independent committee recommended stopping recruitment for futility prior to meeting the planned randomization of 366 patients. Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin did not achieve better treatment success at day 7 of therapy than cloxacillin alone in MSSA bacteremia. Further trials should consider the intrinsic heterogeneity of the infection by using a more personalized approach. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03959345 .

Antibacterial effect of seven days exposure to ceftolozane-tazobactam as monotherapy and in combination with fosfomycin or tobramycin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with ceftolozane-tazobactam MICs at or above 4 mg/l in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model

OBJECTIVES

To use a pre-clinical pharmacokinetic infection model to assess the antibacterial effect of ceftolozane/tazobactam alone or in combination with fosfomycin or tobramycin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains with MICs at or higher than the clinical breakpoint (MIC ≥ 4 mg/L).

METHODS

An in vitro model was used to assess changes in bacterial load and population profiles after exposure to mean human serum concentrations of ceftolozane/tazobactam associated with doses of 2 g/1 g q8h, fosfomycin concentrations associated with doses of 8 g q8h or tobramycin at doses of 7 mg/kg q24 h over 168 h.

RESULTS

Simulations of ceftolozane/tazobactam at 2 g/1 g q8h alone produced 3.5-4.5 log reductions in count by 6 h post drug exposure for strains with MIC ≤32 mg/L. The antibacterial effect over the first 24 h was related to ceftolozane/tazobactam MIC. There was subsequent regrowth with most strains to bacterial densities of >106 CFU/mL. Addition of either fosfomycin or tobramycin resulted in suppression of regrowth and in the case of tobramycin more rapid initial bacterial killing up to 6 h. These effects could not be related to either fosfomycin or tobramycin MICs. Changes in population profiles were noted with ceftolozane/tazobactam alone often after 96 h exposure but such changes were suppressed by fosfomycin and almost abolished by the addition of tobramycin.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of either fosfomycin or tobramycin to ceftolozane/tazobactam at simulated human clinically observed concentrations reduced P. aeruginosa bacterial loads and the risk of resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam when strains had ceftolozane/tazobactam MIC values at or above the clinical breakpoint.

Urinary pH and antibiotics, choose carefully. A systematic review

Uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common bacterial infection in women. Since 1948, the relationship between urinary pH and antibiotics (ABs) has been established. We aimed to search for the best urinary pH for each family of antibiotics and to assess whether pH changes bacterial susceptibility to them. We included in vitro research and in vivo studies including one or more bacterial species and tested the effect of one or more ABs at different pH values. We also included randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) in uncomplicated UTI (EAU guidelines 2019 definition), choosing the ABs based on urinary pH or using an antibiotic plus urinary pH modifiers (L-methionine, vitamin C…) vs. an antibiotic and a placebo. Quadas-2 tool was used as a quality assessment of the studies and PRISMA set of items for systematic reviews. Two authors independently screened and evaluated the papers, while two additional authors individually repeated the search. A fifth researcher acted as an arbiter, and another author collaborated as a hospital pharmaceutical consultant. Alkaline-friendly antibiotics are most fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, trimethoprim. Acidic-friendly antibiotics are fosfomycin, tetracycline, nitrofurantoin and some β-lactams. We suggest performing urine cultures with antibiogram tests, in both acidic and alkaline media, to define the bacterial susceptibility profile. There is insufficient in vivo evidence to support whether choosing an antibiotic based on a patient's urinary pH or adding urinary pH modifiers will lead to a higher cure rate.

Phytotherapy (BNO 1045) of Acute Lower Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Women Normalizes Local Host Responses

INTRODUCTION

Acute lower uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) affects a large proportion of women. Increased antimicrobial resistance has created an urgent need for novel therapeutics and the phytotherapeutic drug BNO 1045 (Canephron® N) has previously been shown to be noninferior to standard antimicrobial stewardship. This sub-analysis from a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase III noninferiority clinical trial using BNO 1045 versus fosfomycin to treat uUTI aimed to determine how urine cytokine levels are altered by the two different treatments.

METHODS

Urine samples from a predefined subset of women diagnosed with uUTI (18-70 years) and treated with BNO 1045 (n = 58) or fosfomycin (n = 69) were analyzed for urine levels of IL-6 and IL-8, using analyte-to-creatinine ratios.

RESULTS

BNO 1045 treatment showed similar effects to fosfomycin treatment in reducing both urine IL-6 and IL-8 levels. Mean IL-6 and IL-8 levels were markedly reduced in all patients regardless of treatment. BNO 1045 treatment decreased urine IL-8 significantly (p = 0.0142) and showed a trend toward reduction of urine IL-6 (p = 0.0551). Fosfomycin treatment reduced both IL-6 and IL-8 levels significantly (p = 0.0038, <0.0001 respectively).

CONCLUSION

BNO 1045 is, in addition to reducing symptoms, comparable to fosfomycin treatment in reducing the local inflammatory response associated with uUTI.

Fosfomycin for Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Men Undergoing a Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: To assess the effects of fosfomycin compared with other antibiotics as a prophylaxis for urinary tract infections (UTIs) in men undergoing transrectal prostate biopsies. Materials and Methods: We searched multiple databases and trial registries without publication language or status restrictions until 4 January 2022. Parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRS) were included. The primary outcomes were febrile UTI, afebrile UTI, and overall UTI. We used GRADE guidance to rate the certainty of evidence of RCTs and NRSs. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022302743). Results: We found data on five comparisons; however, this abstract focuses on the primary outcomes of the two most clinically relevant comparisons. Regarding fosfomycin versus fluoroquinolone, five RCTs and four NRSs with a one-month follow-up were included. Based on the RCT evidence, fosfomycin likely resulted in little to no difference in febrile UTIs compared with fluoroquinolone. This difference corresponded to four fewer febrile UTIs per 1000 patients. Fosfomycin likely resulted in little to no difference in afebrile UTIs compared with fluoroquinolone. This difference corresponded to 29 fewer afebrile UTIs per 1000 patients. Fosfomycin likely resulted in little to no difference in overall UTIs compared with fluoroquinolone. This difference corresponded to 35 fewer overall UTIs per 1000 patients. Regarding fosfomycin and fluoroquinolone combined versus fluoroquinolone, two NRSs with a one- to three-month follow-up were included. Based on the NRS evidence, fosfomycin and fluoroquinolone combined may result in little to no difference in febrile UTIs compared with fluoroquinolone. This difference corresponded to 16 fewer febrile UTIs per 1000 patients. Conclusions: Compared with fluoroquinolone, fosfomycin or fosfomycin and fluoroquinolone combined may have a similar prophylactic effect on UTIs after a transrectal prostate biopsy. Given the increasing fluoroquinolone resistance and its ease to use, fosfomycin may be a good option for antibiotic prophylaxis.

Comparison of amikacin with fosfomycin as an add-on to ciprofloxacin for antibiotic prophylaxis in transrectal prostate biopsy: A single-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of ciprofloxacin (CP) and fosfomycin compared with CP and amikacin in patients with a fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant rectal flora who have undergone transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 516 patients with FQ-resistant rectal flora based on rectal swab cultures were divided into two groups according to prophylactic antibiotics. Patients in both groups were administered CP (400 mg, intravenous [IV], twice daily) on the same day as TRUSPB and 1 day after biopsy. The amikacin group (n=260) was administered a single injection of amikacin (1 g, IV) 1 hour before TRUSPB, whereas the fosfomycin group (n=256) was administered fosfomycin (3 g, orally) the night before the procedure. The primary endpoint was the rate of infectious complications in the two groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 13 patients (2.5%) reported infectious complications: 12 patients (4.62%) in the amikacin group compared with 1 patient (0.39%) in the fosfomycin group (risk ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.65), respectively, which was a statistically significant difference (p=0.017). This corresponds to a number needed to treat of 24 patients (95% CI, 15-65) to prevent one infectious complication. In the multivariate analysis to assess variables related to infectious complications, prophylactic antibiotics with added fosfomycin was associated with infectious complications (odds ratio, 0.060; 95% CI, 0.008-0.459).

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of FQ resistance, CP and fosfomycin may reduce the rate of infectious complications compared with CP and amikacin prophylaxis.

eaberry in the treatment of acute uncoplcated cystitis (BRUMI): protocol of a multicentre, randomised double-blind clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Bearberry (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi) leaf is available as a treatment of uncomplicated cystitis in several European countries. The antimicrobial activity of its extracts and some of its individual constituents has been observed in vitro; however, the efficacy of bearberry compared with standard antimicrobial therapy has not been assessed yet.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study is to assess the safety and non-inferiority of bearberry as an alternative therapy in the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis in comparison with standard antibiotic therapy (fosfomycin).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a randomised controlled double-blinded multicentre trial. Eligible patients will be premenopausal women with a sum score of ≥6 for the typical acute uncomplicated cystitis symptoms (frequency, urgency, painful urination, incomplete emptying, suprapubic pain and visible haematuria) reported on the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) typical domain and pyuria. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive 3 g single dose of fosfomycin powder and two placebo tablets three times a day for 7 days or B a single dose of placebo powder and two tablets containing a dry extract of Uvae ursi folium. At least 504 patients (allocated as 1:1) will need to be enrolled to access non-inferiority with a non-inferiority limit of 14% for the primary endpoint.Improvement of symptoms of uncomplicated cystitis (based on the ACSS score) at day 7 is defined as the primary endpoint, whereas several secondary endpoints such as the number and ratio of patients with bacteriuria at day 7, frequency and severity of side effects; recurrence of urinary tract infection, concurrent use of other over the counter (OTC) medications and food supplements will be determined to elucidate more detailed differences between the groups. The number of recurrences and medications taken for treatment will be monitored for a follow-up period of 90 days (80-100 days).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Medical Research Council (IV/4225-1/2021/EKU). The results will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05055544.

Effectiveness of Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Bacteremic Urinary Tract Infections: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

The consumption of broad-spectrum drugs has increased as a consequence of the spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli. Finding alternatives for these infections is critical, for which some neglected drugs may be an option.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether fosfomycin is noninferior to ceftriaxone or meropenem in the targeted treatment of bacteremic urinary tract infections (bUTIs) due to MDR E coli.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This multicenter, randomized, pragmatic, open clinical trial was conducted at 22 Spanish hospitals from June 2014 to December 2018. Eligible participants were adult patients with bacteremic urinary tract infections due to MDR E coli; 161 of 1578 screened patients were randomized and followed up for 60 days. Data were analyzed in May 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 1 to 1 to receive intravenous fosfomycin disodium at 4 g every 6 hours (70 participants) or a comparator (ceftriaxone or meropenem if resistant; 73 participants) with the option to switch to oral fosfomycin trometamol for the fosfomycin group or an active oral drug or parenteral ertapenem for the comparator group after 4 days.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was clinical and microbiological cure (CMC) 5 to 7 days after finalization of treatment; a noninferiority margin of 7% was considered.

RESULTS

Among 143 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population (median [IQR] age, 72 [62-81] years; 73 [51.0%] women), 48 of 70 patients (68.6%) treated with fosfomycin and 57 of 73 patients (78.1%) treated with comparators reached CMC (risk difference, -9.4 percentage points; 1-sided 95% CI, -21.5 to ∞ percentage points; P = .10). While clinical or microbiological failure occurred among 10 patients (14.3%) treated with fosfomycin and 14 patients (19.7%) treated with comparators (risk difference, -5.4 percentage points; 1-sided 95% CI, -∞ to 4.9; percentage points; P = .19), an increased rate of adverse event-related discontinuations occurred with fosfomycin vs comparators (6 discontinuations [8.5%] vs 0 discontinuations; P = .006). In an exploratory analysis among a subset of 38 patients who underwent rectal colonization studies, patients treated with fosfomycin acquired a new ceftriaxone-resistant or meropenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria at a decreased rate compared with patients treated with comparators (0 of 21 patients vs 4 of 17 patients [23.5%]; 1-sided P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that fosfomycin did not demonstrate noninferiority to comparators as targeted treatment of bUTI from MDR E coli; this was due to an increased rate of adverse event-related discontinuations. This finding suggests that fosfomycin may be considered for selected patients with these infections.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02142751.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Neonatal sepsis is a serious bacterial infection of neonates, globally killing up to 680 000 babies annually. It is frequently complicated by antimicrobial resistance, particularly in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings with widespread resistance to the WHO’s recommended empirical regimen of ampicillin and gentamicin.

Objectives

We assessed the utility of flomoxef and fosfomycin as a potential alternative empirical regimen for neonatal sepsis in these settings.

Methods

We studied the combination in a 16-arm dose-ranged hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) experiment and chequerboard assays. We further assessed the combination using clinically relevant regimens in the HFIM with six Enterobacterales strains with a range of flomoxef/fosfomycin MICs.

Results

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of the HFIM experimental output, along with data from chequerboard assays, indicated synergy of this regimen in terms of bacterial killing and prevention of emergence of fosfomycin resistance. Flomoxef monotherapy was sufficient to kill 3/3 strains with flomoxef MICs ≤0.5 mg/L to sterility. Three of three strains with flomoxef MICs ≥8 mg/L were not killed by fosfomycin or flomoxef monotherapy; 2/3 of these were killed with the combination of the two agents.

Conclusions

These data suggest that flomoxef/fosfomycin could be an efficacious and synergistic regimen for the empirical treatment of neonatal sepsis in LMIC settings with prevalent antimicrobial resistance. Our HFIM results warrant further assessment of the flomoxef/fosfomycin combination in clinical trials.

Clinical effectiveness and bacteriological eradication of three different Short-COurse antibiotic regimens and single-dose fosfomycin for uncomplicated lower Urinary Tract infections in adult women (SCOUT study): study protocol for a randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections (uLUTI) are a common problem in primary care. Current local guidelines recommend the use of a single 3 g dose of fosfomycin. However, most general practitioners (GP) prefer short-course therapies to single-dose therapy. No study has compared head-to-head short-course antimicrobial agents for uLUTIs. Therefore, the aim of this randomised clinical trial is to compare three different short-course antibiotic therapies with a single-dose of fosfomycin for these infections.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This will be a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, open trial. Women aged 18 or older and with symptoms of uLUTI and a positive urine dipstick analysis will be randomised to one of the following four groups: a single dose of 3 g of fosfomycin, 2 days of 3 g of fosfomycin o.d., 3 days of pivmecillinam 400 mg three times per day (t.i.d) or 5 days of nitrofurantoin 100 mg t.i.d. A total sample of 1120 patients was calculated. The primary endpoint is clinical effectiveness at day 7, defined as cure of symptoms reported by the patients in a diary including four symptoms: dysuria, urgency, frequency and suprapubic pain, which will be scored on a 4-point severity scale (not present/mild/moderate/severe). Follow-up visits are scheduled at days 7 (phone call), 14 and 28 for assessing evolution. Urine samples will be collected in the three on-site visits and urine cultures performed. If positive, antibiograms for the three antibiotics studied will be performed. Bacterial eradication will be measured at days 14 and 28.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Ethical Board of IDIAP Jordi Gol (reference number: 21/173-AC) and Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices. The findings of this trial will be disseminated through research conferences and peer-review journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04959331; EudraCT Number: 2021-001332-26.

TIME SCHEDULE

January 2022 to April 2023.

Multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase IV-III study to evaluate the efficacy of cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone in adult patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: study protocol for the SAFO trial

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteraemia is a frequent condition, with high mortality rates. There is a growing interest in identifying new therapeutic regimens able to reduce therapeutic failure and mortality observed with the standard of care of beta-lactam monotherapy. In vitro and small-scale studies have found synergy between cloxacillin and fosfomycin against S. aureus. Our aim is to test the hypothesis that cloxacillin plus fosfomycin achieves higher treatment success than cloxacillin alone in patients with MSSA bacteraemia.

METHODS

We will perform a superiority, randomised, open-label, phase IV-III, two-armed parallel group (1:1) clinical trial at 20 Spanish tertiary hospitals. Adults (≥18 years) with isolation of MSSA from at least one blood culture ≤72 hours before inclusion with evidence of infection, will be randomly allocated to receive either cloxacillin 2 g/4-hour intravenous plus fosfomycin 3 g/6-hour intravenous or cloxacillin 2 g/4-hour intravenous alone for 7 days. After the first week, sequential treatment and total duration of antibiotic therapy will be determined according to clinical criteria by the attending physician.Primary endpoints: (1) Treatment success at day 7, a composite endpoint comprising all the following criteria: patient alive, stable or with improved quick-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, afebrile and with negative blood cultures for MSSA at day 7. (2) Treatment success at test of cure (TOC) visit: patient alive and no isolation of MSSA in blood culture or at another sterile site from day 8 until TOC (12 weeks after randomisation).We assume a rate of treatment success of 74% in the cloxacillin group. Accepting alpha risk of 0.05 and beta risk of 0.2 in a two-sided test, 183 subjects will be required in each of the control and experimental groups to obtain statistically significant difference of 12% (considered clinically significant).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of Bellvitge University Hospital (AC069/18) and from the Spanish Medicines and Healthcare Product Regulatory Agency (AEMPS, AC069/18), and is valid for all participating centres under existing Spanish legislation. The results will be presented at international meetings and will be made available to patients and funders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The protocol has been approved by AEMPS with the Trial Registration Number EudraCT 2018-001207-37. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03959345; Pre-results.

Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine whether daptomycin plus fosfomycin provides higher treatment success than daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia and endocarditis.

METHODS

A randomized (1:1) phase 3 superiority, open-label, and parallel group clinical trial of adult inpatients with MRSA bacteremia was conducted at 18 Spanish hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily plus 2 g of fosfomycin intravenously every 6 hours, or 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily. Primary endpoint was treatment success 6 weeks after the end of therapy.

RESULTS

Of 167 patients randomized, 155 completed the trial and were assessed for the primary endpoint. Treatment success at 6 weeks after the end of therapy was achieved in 40 of 74 patients who received daptomycin plus fosfomycin and in 34 of 81 patients who were given daptomycin alone (54.1% vs 42.0%; relative risk, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, .93-1.8]; P = .135). At 6 weeks, daptomycin plus fosfomycin was associated with lower microbiologic failure (0 vs 9 patients; P = .003) and lower complicated bacteremia (16.2% vs 32.1%; P = .022). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 13 of 74 patients (17.6%) receiving daptomycin plus fosfomycin, and in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) receiving daptomycin alone (P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

Daptomycin plus fosfomycin provided 12% higher rate of treatment success than daptomycin alone, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. This antibiotic combination prevented microbiological failure and complicated bacteremia, but it was more often associated with adverse events.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT01898338.