Perioperative anaphylaxis

The incidence of immune-mediated anaphylaxis during anesthesia ranges from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 20,000. Neuromuscular blocking agents are most frequently incriminated, followed by latex and antibiotics, although any drug or substance used may be a culprit. Diagnosis relies on tryptase measurements at the time of the reaction and skin tests, specific immunoglobulin E, or basophil activation assays. Treatment consists of rapid volume expansion and epinephrine administration titrated to symptom severity.

Suspected allergy to local anaesthetics: follow-up in 135 cases

BACKGROUND

Local anaesthetics (LA) are generally considered safe with respect to allergy. However, various clinical reactions steadily occur. Even though most reactions are manifestations of reflexes to perceptive stimuli, uncertainty often remains regarding a possible allergic mechanism. This uncertainty later leads to an avoidance of local anaesthesia and unnecessarily painful interventions, resource-consuming general anaesthesia or even the risk of re-exposure to other yet unidentified allergens. In the present study, follow-up procedures at an allergy clinic were analysed to examine the frequency of identified causative agents and pathogenetic mechanisms and evaluate the strength of the diagnostic conclusions.

METHOD

The medical records of 135 cases with alleged allergic reactions to LA were reviewed. Diagnoses were based on case histories, skin tests, subcutaneous challenge tests and in vitro IgE analyses.

RESULTS

Two events (1.5%) were diagnosed as hypersensitivity to LA, articaine-adrenaline and tetracaine-adrenaline, respectively. Ten reactions (7%) were diagnosed as IgE-mediated allergy to other substances including chlorhexidine, latex, triamcinolone and possibly hexaminolevulinate. As challenge testing was not consistently performed with the culprit LA compound, follow-ups were short of definitely refuting hypersensitivity in 61% of the cases. The reported clinical manifestations were in general diagnostically unspecific, but itch and generalised urticaria were most frequent in test-positive cases.

CONCLUSION

Reactions during local anaesthesia are rarely found to be an IgE-mediated LA allergy. Whenever the clinical picture is compatible with allergy, other allergens should also be tested.

[Allergic reaction during anesthesia: two case reports]

We experienced two cases of serious and potentially life-threatening allergic reactions. The first patient was a 28-year-old male patient scheduled for surgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations and another patient was a 66-year-old male patient scheduled for hepatic resection. After uneventful anesthetic induction, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane, air and oxygen. Both patients developed allergic reactions characterized by cardiovascular failure during anesthesia. Resuscitative treatment included rapid fluid infusion, administration of adrenaline and steroid. Both patients were successfully resuscitated without any lasting sequelae. The causative agent in one of these cases was probably a prophylactically used antibiotic, while that of the other case was a reaction to latex. Both patients showed elevated histamine and tryptase concentrations in blood samples. Recently, the incidence of allergic reactions to antibiotics and latex during anesthesia is increasing. Anesthesiologists should, therefore, be aware of the possibility of allergic reactions to all drugs and substances, especially to latex, during the perioperative period.

Latex-induced occupational asthma: time trend in incidence and relationship with hospital glove policies

BACKGROUND

Natural rubber latex (NRL) has become as a major cause of occupational asthma (OA) in workers using NRL gloves. Few population-based studies have assessed the impact of changes in the patterns of glove usage on the incidence of NRL-induced OA.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the time trends in incident cases of NRL-induced OA in Belgium and examine whether incidence rates were related to the types of gloves used in hospitals.

METHODS

Incident cases of NRL-induced OA were identified through a retrospective review of all claims submitted to the Workers' Compensation Board up to December 2004. Based on the results of diagnostic procedures, the diagnosis of NRL-induced OA was categorized as definite, probable, unlikely, or indeterminate. The patterns of glove usage were characterized through a questionnaire survey of Belgian hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 298 claims for NRL-induced OA were identified, including 127 subjects with definite OA and 68 with probable OA. Categorized by the year of asthma onset, the incident cases of definite and probable NRL-induced OA markedly decreased from 1999 onwards. The use of powdered NRL gloves fell from 80.9% in 1989 to 17.9% in 2004. Powdered NRL gloves were predominantly substituted with NRL-free gloves, especially in the case of non-sterile procedures.

CONCLUSION

These national compensation-based data confirm that a persistent decline in the incidence of NRL-induced OA has occurred since late 1990s. This downward trend has temporally been associated with a decreasing usage of powdered NRL, further supporting a beneficial role of changes in glove policies.

Allergenic compounds on the inner and outer surfaces of natural latex gloves: MALDI mass spectrometry and imaging of proteinous allergens

Natural latex gloves are the cause of a severe health problem to an increasing number of healthcare workers or patients due to the presence of protein allergens as Hevein or Rubber Elongation Factor (REF). One of the most challenging problems is the in situ localization of theses allergens in, e.g. gloves, to estimate the allergenic potential of the latex material. A sample preparation protocol applying a binary matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization(MALDI) matrix containing alpha-cyano-4-hydroxy cinnamic acid (CHCA) and 2,5-dihydroxy benzoic acid (DHB) on trifluoro acetic acid (TFA) etched latex glove surfaces allowed the direct determination (exact molecular weight) of Hevein, REF and a truncated form of REF (tREF) within nine different brands of natural latex gloves by means of MALDI-TOF-MS in the linear mode. MALDI mass spectrometry demonstrated that Hevein, tREF and REF were present on the inner surfaces (in direct contact with the skin) of many, but not all, investigated gloves without any prior extraction procedure. Additionally, different isoforms of the allergen Hevein were detected (exhibiting ragged C-termini). tREF and REF could always be detected beside each other, but were not observed on every latex glove sample, which contained Hevein. It was also demonstrated that there is a significant difference in terms of proteins and polymers between inner and outer surfaces of gloves, which helps to explain the different allergenic potential of these.MALDI imaging allowed for the first time the unambiguous localization of all three allergens in parallel and showed that Hevein was present on 36% of the investigated area of a latex glove with a certain localization, whereupon, tREF and REF were only found on 25% of the investigated material.

[Consensus Document. Update on latex exposure and use of gloves in Italian health care settings]

This consensus document was prepared by an Italian working group including occupational health professionals involved for many years in the management of glove- and latex-related problems in health care settings. The aim of this document was to address the most significant technical, epidemiological, clinical, environmental and prevention problems related to the use of gloves and latex. The group's recommendations are based on scientific evidence and practical experience but they cannot be considered as final. These topics need to be periodically revised. The following points should be taken into account: glove quality seems to have improved considerably but the information on glove features provided by the manufacturers is often still inaccurate or incomplete; the regulations in force provide that the manufacturers perform tests to supply evidence for the quality of the products but they do not indicate which analytical method should be used and they do not require that the results be reported in the technical data sheets. Thus the manufacturers have only to declare that their products are "in accordance with the rules"; therefore, purchasers should require the manufacturing companies to supply detailed information and verify their reliability. Moreover, the rules should be adapted to higher quality standards; occupational physicians must be involved for the correct choice and purchase of protective gloves; the use of gloves (in particular latex gloves) and latex devices in health care settings should be based on specific criteria: procedures must be available stating which kind of gloves are suitable for specific tasks. When exposure to latex cannot be avoided it is necessary to choose products that have good biocompatibility (e.g., powder free-gloves with low allergen content); once and for all latex powdered gloves should no longer be commercially available! labels for latex devices (including gloves) should report the extractable latex allergen content. Limit values for extractable latex allergens should be established; the use of synthetic rubber gloves should be encouraged since some materials (e.g., neoprene and nitrile rubber) appear to have physical properties and protective efficacy similar to latex, plus good biocompatibility; more studies should be promoted to verify the protective efficacy of new synthetic materials; health care workers should be informed about the advisability and usefulness of using materials other than latex; health care services should not cause additional risks but rather highlight the advantages for workers and patients if the use of latex gloves and devices is minimized.

[Anaphylactic reaction to latex during spinal anesthesia: a case report]

A 46-year-old man, with a history of atopic dermatitis and bronchial asthma, underwent surgery for an inguinal hernia. Forty-three minutes subsequent to spinal anesthesia, the patient complained suddenly of dyspnea with wheezing. Blood pressure decreased and skin eruption was observed on his chest. Postoperative laboratory tests revealed high IgE concentration, and a skin test confirmed an allergy to latex. The patient's allergic reaction was easily overlooked because of his history of bronchial asthma and the possibility that the hypotension was caused by the high spinal anesthesia. Latex allergy should be considered in any suspicious case presenting with these symptoms during surgery. After recovery, a skin test should be used to confirm the allergy to avoid repeated allergic episodes.

Anaphylaxis-induced acute ST-segment elevation myocardial ischemia treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: report of two cases

Acute coronary syndromes have been described as potential complications of any type of anaphylactic reaction. The real pathogenic mechanism inducing acute myocardial ischemia in the setting of anaphylaxis is not yet completely understood. Some pathogenic mechanisms, like coronary vasospasm, plaque activation and systemic hypotension, have been suggested. The hypothesis of a central role of mast cell and inflammatory cell activation and release of potent vasoactive mediators, inducing the mechanisms mentioned above, is the mainstay of so-called "cardiac anaphylaxis". We report two cases of anaphylaxis-induced acute ST-segment elevation myocardial ischemia which occurred during coronary angiography. The first one was probably related to contrast media contact, the second one to latex glove contact. Both of them were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention that immediately resolved the myocardial ischemia.

Systematic follow-up increases incidence of anaphylaxis during adverse reactions in anesthetized patients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of hypersensitivity reactions during anesthesia is underestimated because clinical symptoms may vary and diagnosis is not obvious. Our aim was to investigate the consequences of a systematic follow-up of patients on the estimated incidence of allergic reactions during anesthesia.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study over a 2-year period (70,000 anesthesias). When patients were suspected with hypersensitivity reactions or with unexplained adverse reactions during anesthesia, blood was sampled to measure histamine and tryptase, and then skin tests were performed 4-6 weeks later.

RESULTS

During the studied period, 39 patients were enrolled in the database. Eight were excluded because of lack of skin tests. Twenty-two patients had clinical features compatible with immediate hypersensitivity reaction, and nine had reactions rated as 'unexplained' by the attending physician. Following systematic investigation, we found 22 hypersensitivity reactions (15 patients with obvious and seven with unexplained reactions) during anesthesia. This increases the estimated incidence of hypersensitivity reactions from 1 : 4667 to 1 : 3180 anesthesias. Tryptase concentrations were increased in only 50% of these patients. In our series, positive and negative predictive values of tryptase at T(0) for the diagnosis of anaphylaxis were 100% and 60%, respectively. Latex was the major causative agent, followed by neuromuscular blocking agents and antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic follow-up of patients with unexplained reactions during anesthesia increases the estimated incidence of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions during anesthesia by 50%.

[Epidemiology and etiologic agents of occupational asthma]

INTRODUCTION

Occupational asthma is, by definition, a disease that can be prevented through appropriate protective strategies. Epidemiological information is required to guide these interventions, and we here examine epidemiological data on the burden, causes, and risk factors for this condition.

STATE OF THE ART

Population-based surveys indicate that approximately 15% of adult asthma is attributable to the workplace environment. The most common occupational agents implicated include flour, isocyanates, latex, and persulphate salts. The occupations in which occupational asthma has been most commonly reported are bakers, spray painters, health-care workers, hairdressers, and cleaners. The level of exposure to sensitizing agents seems to be the most relevant risk factor. Atopy is a significant risk factor only for the development of sensitization to high molecular weight agents. The role of other individual determinants, such as genetic factors, has been less consistently established. Occupational asthma is associated with a substantial adverse impact on the employment and financial status of affected workers.

PERSPECTIVES

Methodological improvements are required in order to distinguish more accurately between occupational and work-exacerbated asthma. Further investigations of the effectiveness of primary and secondary preventive interventions are also needed.

Priming-like effect and successful desensitization after anaphylactic shock by latex sublingual immunotherapy

The present report deals with some unusual events observed restarting allergy vaccine in a case of anaphylactic shock which occurred giving the maximum scheduled dose (25 drops) of rush sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) to latex. Restarting SLIT by usual (not rush) scheme we observed long-lasting fall of reactivity threshold. The maximum tolerable dose was reduced to 2 drops, a dose fivefold smaller than the one well tolerated during previous rush phase (10 drops). We have excluded a possible nocebo effect and proved that the reduced tolerance was real by double blind placebo-controlled challenge test. We have considered this effect in some ways similar to priming effect. SLIT was continued with two drops every day. After about twenty months we could demostrate a significant reduction of skin reactivity by end-point technique and an improved response to the controlled exposition to latex by use-tests. In the same time the tolerance to vaccine was improved to three drops. The better safety profile allowed us to restart and continue with SLIT also in the reported case of anaphlicatic shock by latex vaccine and, after about two years, to induce valuable hyposensitization. Latex SLIT is confirmed as a safe and effective method.

Occupational allergy to latex among loom tuners in a textile factory

BACKGROUND

Occupational allergy to latex is generally reported from occupational groups such as health care workers; however, few reports derive from other occupational settings.

METHODS

Two male subjects working as loom tuners in a textile manufacturing plant developed severe allergic reactions during the cutting and weaving of elastic bands, initially not suspected to contain latex constituents. Clinical evaluation and lung function tests were supplemented by skin prick testing, specific IgE evaluation and basophil activation assays with extracted elastic bands.

RESULTS

Both workers presented with rhinitis, episodes of tight chest and itchy eyes. Initial spirometry was normal with no significant reversibility; however, a histamine challenge test was positive in one worker. Skin prick testing to a battery of common inhalant allergens was negative; however, raised IgE levels were detected to latex using ImmunoCAP. On further testing, the specific IgE response was directed mainly to the major latex allergens rHev b 5, rHev b 6.01, rHev b 6.02 and nHev b 13. Basophils of the two workers, but not the unaffected control subjects, were strongly activated by extracts of the elastic and the cutting dust material.

CONCLUSIONS

Workers are at high risk of becoming sensitised to latex allergens when exposed to excessive dust produced by loom tuning machines. Latex sensitisation should therefore be considered in workers developing unexplained work-related allergic reactions (including asthma) associated with unlabelled materials in the textile industry.

Prevalence of latex allergy in spina bifida: genetic and environmental risk factors

AIM OF STUDY

To evaluate the prevalence of latex allergy in a population of children with spina bifida (SB) and to assess the role of early exposure to latex products and others risk factors.

INTRODUCTION

SB is related with an higher incidence of latex allergic reactions. These patients received repeated surgical procedures, implant of latex-containing materials and catheterization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty consecutive subjects affected with SB besides answering a questionnaire, underwent a skin-prick test (SPT) to latex and the determination of the specific serum IgE (RAST CAP) to latex. 40% (32/80) of the patients showed a latex sensitization with specific IgE > 0.7 kU/I but only twelve of the 32 sensitized patients (40%) suffered from clinical reactions to latex (urticaria, conjunctivitis, angioedema, rhinitis, bronchial asthma). Number of surgical procedures, but particularly early exposure to latex and familiarity for allergy are correlated with latex allergy (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Latex allergy in SB children is multifactorial situation related with a disease-associated propensity for latex sensitization, early exposure and number of surgical procedures. Prophylactic measures to avoid the exposure, not only in the sanitary environment, through the institution of latex-safe routes and every day, prevent potentially serious allergic reactions.

Condom leukoderma

Contact dermatitis from natural latex of condom has been reported and is attributed to latex sensitivity. Chemical leukoderma from rubber condom is probably not reported. Here we present a case of chemical leukoderma in a 32-year-old male who developed depigmentation around the shaft of the penis in a circumferential pattern. Since the lesion was solitary and the site corresponded to the point of maximum contact of the condom, a diagnosis of contact leukoderma due to latex condom was thought of. Patch testing was done with mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT), dusting powder present in the condom and condom latex as such. The patient tested positive (3+) with mercaptobenzothiazole and the condom latex. On discontinuation of condom use and with UVB phototherapy, lesions repigmented in eight weeks.

Latex allergen sensitization and risk factors due to glove use by health care workers at public health units in Florianopolis, Brazil

BACKGROUND

Natural rubber latex allergy is a "new" illness whose prevalence has reached epidemic proportions in highly exposed populations such as health care professionals.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of reactions to latex and risk factors due to glove use in health care workers (HCW) in Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

METHODS

We evaluated latex-related allergy in 260 HCW by means of a questionnaire, skin prick tests (SPT) and serum latex specific IgE antibody levels. The subjects were divided into two groups depending on level of exposure to latex gloves. Comparisons were made between the different variables and a risk score was calculated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Glove-related symptoms were observed in 57% of 140 HCW. Significant differences between HCW and control groups were found for the following symptoms: contact dermatitis (P < .0001), cutaneous rash (P < .0001), asthma or allergic rhinitis (P < .0001), symptoms associated with toy balloons (P < .0001), airborne glove powder causing latex allergen reaction (P < .0001), food allergy (P < .0001), fruit allergy (P < .0001) and multiple surgical interventions (P = .0052). Contact dermatitis and anaphylaxis were the main problems, with a high risk factor for the development of latex allergy. Logistic regression analysis showed a significant positive association between the risk of latex allergy and those subjects who reported more than 4 positive answers on the questionnaire (including SPT) (odds ratio 6.8; 95% confidence interval 0.7-60.3). No latex-related allergy symptoms were reported by the control group. Serological latex specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E antibody levels were negative for both groups.

CONCLUSION

It is essential to recognize which professionals are sensitized to latex in order to provide appropriate treatment and to establish adequate prevention.

Sublingual desensitization in children with congenital malformations and latex allergy

The frequency of latex allergy in children requiring multiple surgery ranges from 16.7% to 65%. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of latex desensitization in a group of 10 patients with a history of multiple surgical procedures and clinically manifested allergy to latex. We selected 10 children (female-male ratio = 5:5), aged 4-16 yr (mean +/- s.d.: 9 +/- 4), with a history of multiple surgical procedures, adverse reactions to latex and positive skin test to latex and/or specific immunoglobulin E (IgE). Latex allergy diagnosis was confirmed by specific provocation tests (cutaneous, sublingual, mucous, conjunctival tests). Rush (4-day) sublingual desensitization was performed with increasing doses of latex extract (ALK Abellò) under patients' tongue until the highest dose of 500 microg of latex. A maintenance therapy (10 drops of undiluted solution three times a week) was recommended. During the 2-yr follow-up mean values of specific IgG4 and IgE, eosinophilic cationic protein and total IgE did not show significant variations. Patients did not manifest any adverse effect during the rush phase and only two patients manifested mild local symptoms during the maintenance therapy. All the challenges showed a reduction in terms of percentage of positivity and mean scores. All the patients showed a reduction of the mean individual score (p < 0.001). Furthermore patients who needed dental examination or surgery underwent such procedures without the occurrence of symptoms. Our preliminary results show sublingual desensitization to latex can be an important therapeutic tool in the management of young allergic patients requiring multiple operations.

Glove allergy and sensitization to natural rubber latex among nursing staff at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen, Thailand

BACKGROUND

According to studies from different countries, the prevalence of natural rubber latex (NRL) sensitization in healthcare workers ranges from 2.9 to 17%. The incidence and prevalence of sensitization and allergy to NRL in Thailand is limited to two studies. There is no study among the high risk healthcare workers.

OBJECTIVES

1) To estimate the prevalence of natural rubber latex (NRL) glove allergy and NRL sensitization among nurses; 2) To describe its clinical symptoms.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Included in the present study were 412 nursing and medical record staff. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect personal biodata and individual allergy histories to NRL products. Skin prick tests (SPTs) with the commercial NRL allergens; Stallergènes, S.A, Fresnes, France, and common environmental allergens, were performed.

RESULTS

The questionnaire response rate was 88% (412/470), 93% females. The response rate of SPT was 72% (295/412) (95%CI 67.2, 76.0). The prevalence of NRL glove allergic symptoms and NRL sensitization was 24% (95%CI 19.9, 28.1) and 2% (95%CI 0.4, 3.6), respectively. The mostfrequently reported symptoms among the positive SPT to NRL was angioedema. Five of the six NRL sensitised subjects had had high exposure to NRL.

CONCLUSION

NRL sensitization among Thai nursing staff is less prevalent than in healthcare workers in Europe.