Latex Allergy as an Independent Risk Factor for Prosthetic Joint Infection

In response to increasing rates of self-reported latex allergies, changes have been made to prevent anaphylaxis in the operating room, including the use of latex-free gloves. However, the impact of these changes on the risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after arthroplasty is unclear. This study evaluated whether documented latex allergy is an independent risk factor for PJI and aseptic revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted with an administrative claims database. A total of 17,501 patients who underwent TKA and had documented latex allergy were matched 1:4 with 70,004 control subjects, and 8221 patients who underwent THA and had documented latex allergy were matched 1:4 with 32,884 control subjects. Multivariable logistic regression showed that patients who had TKA and had a latex allergy showed significantly higher risk of PJI at both 90 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.26) and 1 year (OR, 1.22) and significantly higher risk of aseptic revision TKA at 1 year (OR, 1.21) after surgery compared with control subjects. Patients who had THA and had a latex allergy had significantly higher risk of PJI at 1 year (OR, 1.19) compared with control subjects. Rates of aseptic revision THA were higher in the latex allergy cohort but statistically comparable (P>.05). Latex allergy was associated with significantly increased risk of PJI and aseptic revision after TKA and significantly increased risk of PJI after THA. More work is needed to determine whether these risks can be mitigated or if latex allergy is an inherent, nonmodifiable risk factor requiring modification to typical arthroplasty pathways. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(4):244-250.].

Latex allergy guidelines for people with spina bifida

An estimated 85% of individuals with spina bifida (SB) survive into adulthood, warranting SB-specific transition to adult healthcare guidelines to address the diverse and complex medical, adaptive, and social needs particular to this condition. Latex allergy constitutes one important health concern for this population that requires ongoing and life-long evidence-based management. This article discusses management of latex allergy according to the SB Latex Allergy Healthcare Guidelines from the 2018 Spina Bifida Association's Fourth Edition of the Guidelines for the Care of People with Spina Bifida, reviews current care models in which such latex allergy guidelines can be implemented, and explores further relevant research topics in SB care relative to latex allergy.

Anaphylaxis triggered by prick test with latex extract: a case report

CONTEXT

Adverse reactions associated with prick tests are rare but may be present as serious systemic reactions.

CASE REPORT

A 38-year-old female nursing technician complained of three episodes of anaphylaxis in one year, all in the workplace. To investigate latex allergy, the patient underwent the prick test with latex, and immediately developed a rash, itchy skin, hoarseness, dyspnea and dry cough. Her condition improved promptly after appropriate measures were established for controlling her anaphylaxis.

CONCLUSION

The skin test must be performed under medical supervision, since complications that can lead to life-threatening reactions, if support measures are not readily implemented, have been attributed to this test.

Hand Dermatitis Risk Factors Among Clinical Nurses in Japan

The purpose of this study was to establish hand dermatitis (HD) risk factors among Japanese nurses. A questionnaire was administered to 1,162 clinical nurses, from whom 860 replies were received (response rate of 74.0%). Their overall HD prevalence was 53.3%. Several risk factors were identified: using latex gloves (odds ratio [OR] 1.9), allergies in adulthood (OR 2.7), urticaria as an adult (OR 1.5), atopic dermatitis as an adult (OR 2.7), any allergies to latex products (OR 5.2), skin irritation following contact with latex (OR 4.1), contact dermatitis following contact with latex (OR 3.5), family history of hay fever (OR 1.6), and family history of atopic dermatitis (OR 1.9). The use of hand cream was associated with a 50% reduction in HD risk (OR 0.5). In this study, we found that Japanese clinical nurses suffer a significant occupational burden from HD. As such, it is essential that hospital managers consider interventions to reduce this troublesome occupational disease among clinical nurses in Japan, as elsewhere.

[Anaphylaxis as part of a clinical diagnosis of mastocytosi - case demonstration]

Mastocytosis is a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by excessive proliferation and accumulation of mast cells--in one or more organs. The number of symptoms and clinical prognosis vary depending on the disease. One of the most severe potential outcome of mastocytosis is anaphylactic shock. Early diagnosis and identification of triggers enables education and avoidance them. We describe the case of a 31-year-old woman with systemic mastocytosis (SM) without skin symptoms with multiple anaphylactic reactions, including two severe. Systemic mastocytosis was confirmed in bone marrow and genetic studies. We identify allergic triggers: latex and cefuroxime and also other non-immunological triggers as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The patient never had any allergic reaction after Hymenoptera stings. Only one result of serum tryptase was elevated. There was a need to determine the safety of antibiotic use and anesthetic drugs before cesarean. The moment when the disease was diagnosed and triggers were identifie, helped avoid further severe reactions.

[Usefulness of the guidelines for prevention of perioperative anaphylaxis associated with latex allergy]

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis associated with latex allergy is one of the fatal complications during anesthesia. To prevent this complication, we find out latex allergy and high-risk patients by preoperative interview and keep away not only latex allergic patients but high-risk patients from latex allergen in the operating room. In this study, we evaluated the cost-benefit efficiency of our guidelines.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study for six month. We classified the patients undergoing elective operation into three categories: latex allergy (group LA), high-risk of latex allergy (group LH) and control (group C), and we compared the incidence of perioperative anaphylaxis and the cost of using products without latex allergen.

RESULTS

A total of 1.291 patients were enrolled in the analysis. Five patients (0.4%) and 206 patients (16.0%) categorized into group LA, and LH respectively. There was no patient diagnosed with anaphylaxis associated with latex allergy during the observation period. We are able to save the cost of 3.5 million yen every year by our method than using products without latex allergen for all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our guidelines for prevention of perioperative anaphylaxis associated with latex allergy might be efficient from the standpoint of cost-benefit

[Predisposition to latex allergy undetected on preoperative evaluation: a case report]

A 70-year-old man was scheduled to undergo laparoscopic total gastrectomy for stomach cancer. He had no history of atopy, fruit allergies, or frequent exposure to natural rubber. Preoperative latex-specific IgE antibodies were negative. Anesthesia was induced, and the surgery was started uneventfully. Soon after the surgeon had begun to manipulate the intestine, the blood pressure suddenly dropped to 27/21 mmHg. Facial flushing was also observed. Anaphylactic shock caused by latex was strongly suspected, and surgery was immediately halted. The surgical gloves were changed to latex-free ones, and adrenaline was administered. The blood pressure was gradually normalized within 30 min, and the facial flushing mostly disappeared. Postoperative laboratory examination revealed that serum tryptase had increased to 34.4 microg l-1, 40 minutes after the onset of anaphylaxis, and decreased to 19.4 microg l-1, 24 hours than later. Latex-specific IgE antibodies and a prick test with latex were both positive. Consequently, the diagnosis of latex-induced anaphylactic reaction was confirmed. Because even detailed questioning and examination does not always identify such a predisposition, avoiding contactwith latex products is more rational exhaustively checking every preoperative patient for latex allergy

Anaphylactic reactions during anaesthesia: neuromuscular blocking agents, latex and antibiotics

A French team investigated hypersensitivity reactions that occurred during locoregional or general anaesthesia over an 8-year period. They estimated that the incidence of anaphylactic reactions was about 1 per 10 000 anaesthetic procedures. Among the 1816 reports of anaphylactic reactions, the most commonly implicated drugs were neuromuscular blocking agents (1067 cases), latex (361 cases), and antibiotics (236 cases). Some anaphylactic reactions to neuromuscular blocking agents occurred in patients who had never previously been anaesthetised, suggesting cross-reactivity with other, poorly known, substances. Most reactions in children were due to latex, followed by neuromuscular blocking agents and antibiotics. In practice, exposure to latex devices should be minimised, or simply avoided when possible. A history of sensitization to substances sharing allergenic sites with neuromuscular blocking agents should be investigated, and measures should be taken to protect patients.

Profile of latex sensitization and allergies in children and adolescents with myelomeningocele in São Paulo, Brazil

BACKGROUND

Latex allergy is an important cause of occupational allergy. In many countries the prevalence of latex allergy is still high and the profile of latex sensitization is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the frequency of sensitization and allergy to latex in children and adolescents with myelomeningocele and to identify associated risk factors.

METHODS

The study included 55 children and adolescents with myelomeningocele followed at a specialized center. In addition to a standard questionnaire and skin prick tests (SPTs) to aeroallergens and total latex, the patients underwent determination of total and specific serum IgE to latex and recombinant allergens.

RESULTS

We observed a prevalence of 25% for latex sensitization and of 20% for latex allergy. Twenty-four patients (43.6%) were atopic and the average age for the first reaction to latex was 44.5 months. Cutaneous reactions were the most frequently reported reactions (72.7%). Specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E to rHev b 1, rHev b 3, rHev b 5, rHev b 6.1, and rHev b 6.2 was detected in over 50% of patients allergic to latex. Multivariate analysis showed current asthma, atopy, and having undergone 4 or more operations to be risk factors for latex sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study documented a high prevalence of sensitization and allergy to latex in patients with myelomeningocele. Specific IgE to rHev b 1, rHev b 3, rHev b 5, rHev b 6.1, and rHev b 6.2 was detected in over 50% of children and adolescents with myelomeningocele who are allergic to latex. A history of current asthma, atopy, and having undergone 4 or more operations were independent risk factors for latex allergy.

[Three cases of latex allergy complicated with anaphylaxis during cesarean section]

We experienced three cases of latex anaphylaxis during cesarean section in one year.

CASE

1 A 26-year-old woman underwent emergency cesarean section. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was performed and drip infusion of cefazolin sodium was started before operation. After delivery, intravenous injection of methylergometrine maleate and intramyometrial injection of oxytocin were given. Eight minutes after delivery, she complained of dyspnea and edema of eyelids; no change in vital signs were noted. We suspected an anaphylactic reaction and administered antihistamines as well as methylprednisolone. Inhalation of beta-stimulators and sevoflurane using a face mask improved her respiratory symptoms.

CASE 2

A 25-year-old woman underwent emergency cesarean section. We noticed wheals involving her eyelids and legs after operation and administered methylprednisolone. CASE 3: A 23-year-old woman underwent elective cesarean section. Five minutes after delivery and oxytocin injection, she complained of edema of eyelids, facial erythematous edema, and dyspnea. We suspected latex anaphylaxis and stopped using latex products. Then, we treated her with antihistamines, methylprednisolone and beta-stimulators. The diagnosis of latex anaphylaxis was made by positive results of skin tests to latex and an increase in the levels of latex-specific immunoglobulin E. We conclude that cesarean section is an important risk factor for latex anaphylaxis.

Anaphylactic shock during hyperbaric oxygen therapy

A case of a 38-year-old woman is reported who was treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy to cure a dehiscent wound. She suffered from "oral-allergy syndrome" (OAS) while eating certain fruits, and from itching when wearing latex gloves to handle hair dyes. Fifteen minutes after the start of compression, malaise, anxiety, dyspnoea, tachycardia, cold sweating and laryngeal stridor occurred. Despite intensive care treatment, face angioedema persisted for several days. On the basis of history, radioallergosorbent test (RAST) and prick tests, latex was assumed to be responsible for the anaphylactic reaction. To our knowledge, this is the first extensive report of an anaphylactic reaction to latex in a hyperbaric chamber. The lesson drawn from this case record can be summarized as follows: 1) never fail to collect a thorough history; 2) set up a latex-safe hyperbaric chamber when needed; 3) have an emergency kit always near at hand.

[A case of anaphylactic shock induced by latex during cesarean section]

We report a 39-year-old woman who showed intraoperative anaphylactic shock during elective cesarean section in the 38th week of pregnancy. She underwent cesarean sections under general anesthesia at 33 years of age, and under spinal anesthesia at 37 years without any complication; other past history was unremarkable. Spinal anesthesia was performed with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 2.5 ml and analgesia level up to T2 was obtained 12 minutes later. The operation was uneventful at the birth of a neonate weighing 2700 g delivered with Apgar scores of 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. Drip infusion of oxytocin was started after the delivery and uterine contraction was good. Five minutes later, blood pressure decreased abruptly to 70/40 mmHg, heart rate increased to 130 beats min(-1) and the patient complained of chest discomfort. Bolus injections of ephedrine and phenylephrine were ineffective, and continuous infusion of adrenaline was started to maintain blood pressure. The operation was finished and the patient was intubated for artificial ventilation to prevent airway obstruction. The tracheal tube was removed the following day and the postoperative course was uneventful thereafter. Plasma tryptase levels at 1 and 6 hours after the episode of hypotension were 9.0 and 1.3 ng x ml(-1). Postoperative blood tests revealed an increase in latex-specific immunoglobulin E, suggesting that anaphylactic shock was induced by latex.

Adverse effects of local anaesthetics - allergy, toxic reactions or hypersensitivity

BACKGROUND

There are several kinds of adverse reactions to the administration of local anaesthetics (LAs): hypersensitivity, which causes reproducible symptoms or signs, initiated by exposure to a defined stimulus at a dose tolerated by normal subjects; toxic reactions - caused by overdose or inappropriate administration; and allergy - when an immunologic mechanism can be shown to be important.The most serious adverse reaction is anaphylaxis, which can be of allergic or non-allergic (anaphylactoid) origin. We analysed clinical adverse reactions to local anaesthetic agents that occurred in the Silesian region.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients, aged 22-56 years, in whom significant reactions had occurred after administration of an LA, were investigated in our institution. The investigation was based on skin prick, intradermal injections and patch testing. In every patient, the concentration of latex IgE antibodies was measured.

RESULTS

True allergic reactions were confirmed in three patients. The allergens were: lidocaine in all three cases, additionally: nickel - in one person and preservative (paraben) - in one patient. No latex allergy was diagnosed.

DISCUSSION

The results showed that real allergic reactions to LA agents are rare and that most of the reported reactions were caused by hypersensitivity. Nevertheless, in each case of adverse reaction, careful review of the history, and testing of immediate and late allergic reactions not only to LA but also to latex and preservatives, should be mandatory.

Late-onset pulmonary edema and disseminated intravascular coagulation due to latex anaphylaxis

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis after the administration of tissue expanders has been reported. Late onset hypotension, thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and pulmonary edema due to the tissue expanders have not been reported.

METHODS

In this case report, late onset hypotension, thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulation and pulmonary edema due to the administration of tissue expanders were described.

RESULTS

The authors report a 16-year-old girl with burn scar deformities scheduled for reconstruction of the scar contractures with insertion of tissue expanders in which the administration of latex tissue expanders was associated with late onset hypotension, thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulation and pulmonary edema. Skin tests performed for latex demonstrated strong positive weal and flare reactions.

CONCLUSION

Late onset anaphylactic reactions due to latex tissue expanders, an unusual unpredictable adverse reaction, must be kept in mind. Early recognition and proper emergent treatment are essential to reversing this complication.

[Anesthesiologist's aptitude for peri-operative detection and treatment of latex allergy]

BACKGROUND

Latex allergy is the second cause of perioperative anaphylaxis. Anesthesiologists play a key role in opportune identification of risk factors, as well as clinical diagnosis and therapeutic management.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the anesthesiologists aptitude to identify and treat latex allergy.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Sixty-six anesthesiologists from five general hospitals located at Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, were evaluated. Aptitude was determined by applying a validated structured instrument. Aptitude levels were measured by using an ordinal scale. Comparisons were performed using Mann Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Anesthesiologist's global aptitude ranged from -2 to 27 with a median of 8 (from a maximum value in the scale of 40); frequencies by each category of the scale were: Random 48 (72.7%), Very bad 11 (16.7%), Bad 4 (6.1%) and Medium only 3 (4.5%). Both Good and Very good categories registered no anesthesiologist. The relationship of this indicator with other variables did not reach statistical significance (KW 6.478; p = 0.16617).

CONCLUSIONS

A suboptimal aptitude was identified among anesthesiologists regarding identification of latex allergy. A need to establish new strategies for educative intervention in order to improve this issue was identified.

Prevention of occupational asthma in Ontario

Occupational asthma continues to be one of the most common occupational lung diseases in industrialized areas. Primary and secondary preventive measures have been well described, but there are relatively few studies to support the effectiveness of such measures, although the benefits of tertiary measures such as early recognition and removal from further exposure to a causative sensitizing agent are well recognized. In Ontario, a combined approach of preventive measures has shown effectiveness in allergy and asthma from occupational exposure to natural rubber latex. In addition, a program to reduce exposure to diisocyanates and introduce medical surveillance was associated with earlier diagnosis and fewer cases in a compensation population. However there remain barriers to the early diagnosis of occupational asthma in Ontario, especially in workers of lower education and lower income. In addition, there is recognized need for further physician education to allow early suspicion and diagnosis of occupational asthma.

Peri-anesthetic Anaphylaxis

General anesthesia and anaphylaxis cause profound physiologic changes. When both occur simultaneously, it is often difficult to recognize and identify the medication or product responsible for the latter. Following such an event, the proper assessment, diagnosis, and recommendations are essential to prevent future reactions. This article reviews the more common causes of anaphylaxis during anesthesia.

Acute Peritoneal Eosinophilia in a Child With Prune-Belly Syndrome Following Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement

Peritoneal eosinophilia, although uncommon, was reported after placement of catheters for peritoneal dialysis. We describe a 7-year-old African-American boy with prune-belly syndrome who developed acute onset of peritoneal eosinophilia after placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter. Peripheral-blood eosinophilia also was noted with the peritoneal eosinophilia, but was not correlative. Intraperitoneal and systemic corticosteroid therapy led to successful resolution of peritoneal eosinophilia. Radioallergosorbent tests indicated sensitization to latex. Unrecognized latex sensitization should be considered in any child with multiple urological surgeries who develops sudden onset of peritoneal eosinophilia.

Early exposure to latex products mediates latex sensitization in spina bifida but not in other diseases with comparable latex exposure rates

BACKGROUND

The high prevalence of latex sensitization in patients with spina bifida (SB) has been attributed to repeated and early exposure to latex products. Other diseases such as gastroschisis/omphalocoele and post-haemorrhagic/congenital hydrocephalus are also associated with repeated and early latex exposure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the high prevalence of latex sensitization in patients with SB is rather related to the underlying disease itself than to disease-associated known risk factors.

METHODS

We compared children with SB (n=35), children with gastroschisis/omphalocoele (G/O, n=20) and children with post-haemorrhagic/congenital hydrocephalus (PH, n=45). All children with SB and PH had a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt since a very young age. Patients who underwent three or less surgical procedures matched in terms of age, number of operations, atopy and gender distribution, and were analysed for IgE sensitization rates to latex.

RESULTS

In the SB group, 16 of 35 patients (46%) showed elevated latex-specific IgE antibodies in contrast to one of 20 patients (5%) in the G/O group and four of 45 patients (8.9%) in the PH group (P<0.0005 and P<0.005, Fisher's exact test). Comparing matched control groups (<or=3 operations), the effects remained significant (P<0.05 and P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the SB population bears a disease-associated propensity for latex sensitization. This effect cannot be explained exclusively by a higher number of operations and differences related to atopy, age or gender.

Differential expression of allergens on the internal and external surfaces of latex surgical gloves

BACKGROUND

Differences in latex allergen sensitization profiles have been described between children undergoing repeated surgical interventions and health care workers. The purpose of this study was to determine whether such sensitization profiles are associated with differences in the expression of latex allergen between the internal and external surfaces of surgical gloves.

METHODS

Extracts were obtained from whole surgical gloves as well as from their external and internal surfaces. The extracts were centrifuged, filtered, concentrated, dialyzed and lyophilized. The protein profile of the extracts was analyzed using hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Immunoblotting was performed using sera from two patients with confirmed latex allergy. Latex recombinant allergen-specific IgE in these two patients was determined using a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (FEIA) method. Latex allergen quantification was determined on both glove surfaces using an ELISA method.

RESULTS

HIC and SDS-PAGE showed qualitative and quantitative differences in proteins between the internal and external glove surfaces, with the former being much richer in proteins. Immunoblotting of glove extracts using sera from two latex-allergic health workers showed differences between glove surface extracts. ELISA quantification of latex allergens demonstrated that the internal glove surface had high amounts of Hev b 5 and Hev b 6.02 whereas the external surface showed Hev b 1, Hev b 3, and Hev b 6.02.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results reveal substantial differences in the composition of latex allergen profiles between the internal and external surfaces of surgical latex gloves, which may suggest a relationship between latex allergen localization and sensitization routes in different risk groups.

Perioperative anaphylaxis from locally applied rifamycin SV and latex

A patient developed severe anaphylaxis during irrigation of a wound with rifamycin SV. The temporal relationship between application of rifamycin SV, the positive skin test and basophil activation test for rifamycin SV strongly supported diagnosis of anaphylaxis from the locally applied antibiotic. However, after operation the patient had two anaphylactic reactions with pruritus, urticaria and angio-oedema after routine care by a nurse, and these were probably caused by natural rubber latex. This case report has several messages. First, it is not widely appreciated that topically applied drugs and related compounds can elicit life-threatening anaphylaxis. Second, it illustrates patients can present with more than one allergy. Finally, it provides an opportunity to summarize the applications of flow cytometry-assisted quantification of in vitro activated basophils in diagnosing the cause of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia.

[Airbone contact dermatitis caused by latex exposure: a clinical case]

We describe the case of a nurse who showed eczematous lesions wide-spread over the neck and face. She worked as a attendant to a surgical chamber and wore vinyl gloves because of previous episodes of contact dermatitis caused by rubber gloves. The allergologic examination demonstrated that total IgE was 69.8 kU/1, both the Skin prick tests and the patch test for latex were positive. Persisting her dermatological symptomatology, in the suspicion of a airborne contact dermatitis, the nurse was removed and addressed to administrative functions for detecting the clinical follow-up. Fortunately, the eczematous manifestations spontaneously disappeared immediately after her transfer. In this case the presence of eczema mainly on air-exposed areas was interpreted as a sign of airborne contact dermatitis to latex. The case is reported in that the clinical picture is not very common.

Latex-induced anaphylactic reaction in a child with spina bifida

Allergy to natural rubber latex presents a unique challenge in the emergency department. Latex allergy in children is most commonly identified in patients who have undergone multiple operations for neural tube defects or genitourinary anomalies. We report a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction to latex in a patient with spina bifida even with latex-free precautions.

[Anesthesia for cesarean section in a patient with Lobstein's syndrome]

We report on a 21-year-old woman with a severe form of Lobstein's syndrome, who underwent a Cesarean section. The following issues are discussed: the risk of sustaining fractures during positioning, fractures by automatic blood pressure measurement, an almost always existing latex allergy, a susceptibility for malignant hyperthermia, potential cardiac defect, difficult endotracheal intubation, lowering of the conus medullaris to an area usually used for spinal puncture, severe spinal deformities resulting in difficult puncture, hemorrhagic diathesis, and unpredictability of the expansion of local anesthetics in the vertebral canal. In this case the procedure could be carried out in spinal anesthesia without encountering major problems.

Latex sensitisation and allergy in children with myelomeningocele

INTRODUCTION

Children with spina bifida (SB) have a high degree of exposure to latex products as a consequence of repeated surgical procedures, implantation of latex-containing materials and catheterisation. The consequence is a higher incidence of latex allergic reactions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of latex sensitisation and allergy in a population of children with myelomeningocele (MMC) and to assess the role of associated risk factors.

RESULTS

Forty-eight percent of the patients (29 out of 60) showed a latex sensitisation with specific IgE >0.7 kU/l while 15% (9 out of 60) were allergic to latex (specific IgE >0.7 kU/l and clinical manifestations). The principal factor correlated with allergy to latex was specific serum IgE to latex (radioallergosorbent test [RAST]) values (p<0.01). Other factors were total serum IgE (paper radioimmunosorbent test [PRIST]) values, number of surgical procedures and familiarity with allergy.

CONCLUSION

These results underline the importance of prophylactic measures to avoid the exposure, not only in the sanitary environment, through the institution of latex-safe routes, but also in daily life, to prevent potentially serious allergic reactions.

Hetastarch allergy and positive latex radioallergosorbent test in a patient suffering cardiovascular decompensation during multiple perioperative periods

The cause of sudden cardiovascular collapse in the perioperative period can be elusive. Allergy may be overlooked as a cause. When allergy is considered, latex is often suspected. Because hetastarch is frequently used in situations involving hypovolemia and hypotension, and because allergic reactions to it are rare, it may be overlooked as a possible allergen. We report a case of a patient suffering cardiovascular decompensation during four nonconsecutive perioperative periods before it was determined that she was allergic to hetastarch. She also had a very highly positive latex radioallergosorbent test, suggesting a latex allergy.

Myelomeningocele, avocados, and rubber tree plants

Infants with myelomeningocele and the nurses who care for them have something in common. Both are at higher risk than the general population for developing latex allergies. This article provides a review of the literature regarding latex production, latex allergic responses in children and adults, types of latex allergic reactions, and prevention of latex allergies.

Increased incidence of latex allergy in children with allergic diseases in Japan

The incidence of latex allergy is increasing in Japanese adults. However, the changing incidence of latex allergy in children with or without allergic diseases has not been reported in detail. After obtaining written informed consent from parents, Japanese children under 14 years of age were studied. In total, 776 non-atopic children, 802 children with allergic rhinitis (AR), 706 children with bronchial asthma (BA) and 844 children with atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome (AEDS) were asked about symptoms of latex allergy, and tested by serum latex-specific IgE, skin prick test to latex allergen and latex-glove-wearing test between 2001 and 2003. All the patients were outpatients at Ujitakeda Hospital, while the non-atopic children were children of the staff of Ujitakeda Hospital or Unitika Ltd. This was a retrospective study. The incidence of latex allergy in 2001/2002/2003 was 1.4/3.1/4.7% in non-atopic children, 3.1/5.1/9.1% in AR patients, 3.6/6.5/10.3% in BA patients and 6.1/11.3/15.9% in AEDS patients, respectively. Moreover, although no cases of anaphylactic shock were noted in allergic patients in 2001, two and eight cases were noted in 2002 and 2003, respectively. These results indicate that the incidence of latex allergy is increasing in paediatric patients with allergic diseases. A latex-reduced environment may be desirable in future.

Grand rounds: latex-induced occupational asthma in a surgical pathologist

CONTEXT

Latex allergy and sensitization have been an important problem facing health care workers. Providing a latex-safe environment is the intervention of choice.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 46-year-old surgical pathologist presented with increasing shortness of breath for the previous 4 years. Twenty years before presentation, he noted a pruritic, erythematous rash on his hands, associated with latex glove use. Fourteen years before presentation, during pathology residency, he developed a nonproductive cough, wheezing, and an urticarial rash, temporally associated with use of powdered latex gloves. These symptoms improved while away from work. At presentation, he had one-flight dyspnea. His skin prick test was positive for latex, and pulmonary function testing showed mild obstruction, which was reversible with bronchodilator use. Because the patient was at risk for worsening pulmonary function and possible anaphylaxis with continued exposure, he was removed from the workplace because no reasonable accommodation was made for him at that time.

DISCUSSION

The patient's presentation is consistent with latex-induced occupational asthma. Initially noting dermal manifestations, consistent with an allergic contact dermatitis secondary to accelerators present in latex gloves, he later developed urticaria, flushing, and respiratory symptoms, consistent with a type I hypersensitivity reaction to latex. He also has reversible airways disease, with significant improvement of peak expiratory flow rate and symptoms when away from work.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL OR PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE

The ideal treatment for latex sensitization is removal from and avoidance of exposure. Clinicians should consider occupational asthma when patients present with new-onset asthma or asthmatic symptoms that worsen at work.

Réaction anaphylactique liée au latex probablement transmis par le greffon au cours d'une transplantation rénale

We report a case of a young man with an allergy to latex who developed anaphylactic shock during anaesthesia for renal transplantation. All anaesthetic agents used before the episode were tested as potential allergens and only latex was shown to be positive. It appears that latex contamination in the graft was the cause since no materials containing latex were used during the operation. We feel it essential that donor organs should be removed in a totally latex-free environment. Such conditions will remove the risk of anaphylactic shock at the point of reperfusion of the transplant.

Managing Latex-Free Mitral Valve Replacement

The management of cardiac surgery patients with latex allergy can be challenging. We describe successful mitral valve replacement in a latex-allergic patient using an integrated multidisciplinary approach. We also provide a list of some available latex-free products or latex-free alternatives.

[Intraoperative anaphylaxis in a patient with undiagnosed latex sensitivity]

Latex allergy is a cause of anaphylactic reactions during general anesthesia. It is currently the second most common cause of anaphylaxis during anesthesia and should be considered in all cases in which signs develop during surgery. Clinical manifestations are highly variable and depend on the type and amount of exposure to the allergen as well as on individual sensitivity. Cardiovascular collapse is the most common presentation in anesthetized patients, and the second most common manifestations are skin rash and bronchospasm. Latex gloves are implicated in most allergic reactions triggered by latex. Individuals allergic to latex are also sensitive to certain fruits (latex-fruit syndrome) because the presence of specific proteins common in both causes a phenomenon known as cross reactivity. A 34-year-old man with acute abdomen underwent emergency exploratory laparoscopy, which was converted to laparotomy based on findings in the surgical field. Coinciding with surgical manipulation, the patient developed severe hypotension, tachycardia, bronchospasm, and arterial desaturation, which responded favorably to intravenous fluids and medication. After all other possible causes of the events were ruled out, intraoperative anaphylactic reaction was suspected and later confirmed by tests, including allergy tests. When the patient was stable and the surgical environment was latex-free, the procedure was carried out with no complications and the postoperative course was uneventful.

Latex and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) allergy: first description of a new association

In this paper we describe the existence of cross-reactivity between allergens from latex and chickpea, a food from the Leguminosae family, which is common in the Mediterranean diet. We present the case report of a spina bifida boy with a clinical relevant food allergy to chickpea (oral syndrome + dysphonia), developing after the appearance of latex allergy symptoms (lip angioedema + intraoperative anaphylaxis). Specific IgE to latex and chickpea was demonstrated by skin prick tests, measurement of patient's serum specific IgE and IgE-immunoblotting. Cross-reactivity was studied by means of EAST-inhibition and western blotting-inhibition. A strong inhibition was observed in several IgE-binding bands when latex extract was used in solid phase and patient serum was preincubated with chickpea extract (chickpea extract as inhibitor phase). As far as we know, this is the first report of cross-reactivity between latex and chickpea, a food which should therefore be added to the extensive list of latex cross-reactive foods.

Latex allergy and skin

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review we address the prevalence and outcome of latex allergy in health care workers (HCWs). Recent findings in natural rubber latex (NRL) allergens and trials of specific immunotherapy (SIT) are also of interest.

RECENT FINDINGS

A study involving skin prick test (SPT) screening in HCWs in Russia and adjacent countries found a prevalence of latex allergy of 1.9%. Questionnaire studies performed in Wales and in the USA identified prevalence rates of about 0.6%. An intervention undertaken at the Mayo Clinic, in which only gloves with low or undetectable allergen levels were allowed, reduced markedly the incidence of NRL allergy. Two studies, one from Finland and another from Ohio, showed that outcomes in latex-allergic HCWs are generally good. A study involving SPT screening showed that 6% of construction workers had latex allergy. A questionnaire study among allergists practicing in the USA showed that 62% performed latex SPT and 6% reported anaphylaxis, which mostly occurred while using a homemade SPT solution. Hev b 2, Hev b 5, Hev b 6.01 and Hev b 13 produced positive SPT reactions in over 60% of latex-allergic individuals. Topical application of NRL in a murine model of protein contact dermatitis caused a striking increase in prohevein-specific (Hev b 6.01) immunoglobulin E levels, together with a T-helper-2 type dermatitis. A placebo-controlled SIT trial with NRL extract alleviated cutaneous symptoms but caused some systemic reactions in latex-allergic patients.

SUMMARY

Low prevalence rates suggest that the peak of the latex allergy epidemic has already passed in HCWs. Hospital-wide interventions requiring use of low-allergen gloves reduce sensitization and changing gloves to nonlatex ones, or even using low-allergen latex gloves, in the affected individuals appears to confer adequate secondary prevention. In the USA there is an urgent need for standardized latex SPT reagent. Hev b 5 and Hev b 6.01 are major in vivo NRL allergens. Findings in mice suggest that NRL proteins eluting from latex gloves may also cause hand eczema in humans. SIT with NRL extract must still be considered an experimental treatment.