Comparison of Teriparatide and Denosumab in Patients Switching From Long-Term Bisphosphonate Use

CONTEXT

Teriparatide and denosumab are effective treatments for osteoporosis and typically reserved as second-line options after patients have used bisphosphonates. However, limited head-to-head comparative effectiveness data exist between teriparatide and denosumab.

OBJECTIVE

We compared changes in bone mineral density (BMD) between groups treated with teriparatide or denosumab after using bisphosphonates, focusing on the change in BMD while on either drug over 2 years.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study using electronic medical records from two academic medical centers in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

The study population included osteoporotic patients >45 years who received bisphosphonates >1 year before switching to teriparatide or denosumab.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Annualized BMD change from baseline at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck.

RESULTS

Patients treated with teriparatide (n = 110) were compared with those treated with denosumab (n = 105); the mean (SD) age was 70 (10) years and median duration (interquartile range) of bisphosphonate use was 7.0 (5.6 to 9.7) years. Compared with denosumab users, teriparatide users had higher annualized BMD change at the spine by 1.3% (95% CI 0.02, 2.7%) but lower at the total hip by -2.2% (95% CI -2.9 to -1.5%) and the femoral neck by -1.1% (95% CI -2.1 to -0.1%). Those who switched to teriparatide had a transient loss of hip BMD for the first year, with no overall increase in the total hip BMD over 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who use long-term bisphosphonates, the decision of switching to teriparatide should be made with caution, especially for patients at high risk of hip fracture.

Study of twice-weekly injections of Teriparatide by comparing efficacy with once-weekly injections in osteoporosis patients: the TWICE study

A 48-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial (the TWICE study) conducted in Japanese primary osteoporosis patients with a high risk of fractures demonstrated that a 28.2-μg twice-weekly regimen of teriparatide can provide comparable efficacy to a 56.5-μg once-weekly regimen of teriparatide, while also improving safety.

INTRODUCTION

While a 56.5-μg once-weekly regimen of teriparatide has high efficacy for osteoporosis, treatment continuation rates are low, with one of the major causes being adverse drug reactions such as nausea or vomiting. The TWICE study was therefore conducted to investigate whether a twice-weekly regimen with 28.2-μg teriparatide can provide comparable efficacy to the 56.5-μg once-weekly regimen while improving safety.

METHODS

A 48-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial was conducted in Japan. Patients with primary osteoporosis aged ≥ 65 years at high risk of fractures (n = 553) were randomly allocated to the 28.2-μg twice-weekly group (n = 277) or the 56.5-μg once-weekly group (n = 276). The primary endpoint was the percentage change in lumbar spine (L2-L4) bone mineral density (BMD) at final follow-up.

RESULTS

The percentage changes in lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD at final follow-up in the 28.2-μg twice-weekly and 56.5-μg once-weekly groups were 7.3% and 5.9%, respectively; the difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) in percentage change was 1.3% (0.400-2.283%). Since the lower limit of the 95% CI was above the pre-specified non-inferiority margin (- 1.6%), non-inferiority of the 28.2-μg twice-weekly group was demonstrated. Adverse drug reactions were significantly less frequent in the 28.2-μg twice-weekly group (39.7% vs 56.2%; p < 0.01); the incidence of major adverse drug reactions was lower, and the number of subjects who discontinued due to adverse drug reactions was less in the 28.2-μg twice-weekly group.

CONCLUSIONS

A 28.2-μg twice-weekly regimen of teriparatide can provide comparable efficacy to a 56.5-μg once-weekly regimen while improving safety.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

JapicCTI-163477 .

Different surgical outcomes in a patient with bilateral atypical femoral fracture related to bisphosphonate use with or without teriparatide treatment

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are first-line drugs for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures, but long-term use of BP reduces bone turnover and is associated with atypical femur fractures (AFFs). Additionally, BP treatment may cause delayed fracture healing or nonunion, which makes AFF treatment difficult. The incidence of AFF is generally low. In fact, there are only a few clinical reports of AFF and there is no controlled study on AFF treatment. Herein, we report a case of multiple osteoporotic fractures. After 5 years of BP treatment, left and right AFFs occurred within 2 years. The fracture types and surgical operations were the same, but the level of bone metabolism and drug treatment were different. The right AFF healed well following teriparatide initiation compared with non-healed left AFF with BP continuation; thus, our case can be considered a self-controlled study. Furthermore, we have reviewed the diagnosis and treatment of this case in detail and analyzed and investigated the potential causes of the different outcomes of AFFs between the two sides to inform the clinical treatment of atypical fractures. Mini Abstract We report a case of bilateral AFFs. The surgical treatments were the same, but the final treatment outcomes were different with or without teriparatide treatment. We investigated the potential causes of the different outcomes of AFFs between the two sides to inform the clinical treatment of AFFs.

A multicenter, randomized, rater-blinded, parallel-group, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilar RGB-10 and reference once-daily teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis

The efficacy and safety of RGB-10 and reference teriparatide were evaluated in a randomized 52-week study in 250 patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. RGB-10 was equivalent to reference teriparatide in efficacy and had a comparable safety profile.

INTRODUCTION

RGB-10 is the first biosimilar teriparatide authorized in the European Union. This multicenter, randomized, rater-blinded, parallel-group phase 3 study evaluated equivalence in efficacy and compared safety between RGB-10 and reference teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture for registration in Japan.

METHODS

Ambulatory postmenopausal women and men (≥ 55 years of age) with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture were randomized 1:1 to receive either RGB-10 or reference teriparatide 20 μg once daily via subcutaneous self-injection for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percent change from baseline to 52 weeks in lumbar spine (L2-L4) bone mineral density (BMD). Safety outcomes and immunogenicity were also assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 250 patients (125 in each group) were randomized. The percent change from baseline to 52 weeks in lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD (mean ± standard deviation) was 8.94% ± 6.19% in the RGB-10 group and 9.65% ± 6.22% in the reference teriparatide group. The estimated between-group difference (95% confidence interval) was - 0.65% (- 2.17% to - 0.87%) within the pre-specified equivalence margin (± 2.8%), which indicates equivalence in efficacy between the two groups. Changes in BMD at lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip and serum procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide were also similar between the groups. Safety profiles, including immunogenicity, were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic equivalence of RGB-10 to reference teriparatide was demonstrated. RGB-10 had comparable safety profile to that of reference teriparatide.

[Prolonged continuous infusion of teriparatide promotes bone metabolism in normal but not in castrated mice]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of continuous pumping of teriparatide (TPTD) on bone metabolism in ovariectomized and normal mice and provide experimental evidence for the selection of animal models for studying the effects of TPTD and its related peptides on osteoclasts.

METHODS

Twenty-four female C57BL mice (6-weeks old) were subjected to ovariectomy (OVX) or sham operation followed 7 days later by continuous pumping of TPTD or the solvent vehicle (VEH) via a micropump (SHAM-VEH, SHAM-TPTD, OVX-VEH, and OVX-TPTD groups; n=6). Two weeks later, the tibial and femoral bones were harvested for micro-CT scanning to measure the parameters of the tibia and the femoral cortical bone. Histopathological examinations of the tibial tissue were conducted using HE staining and TRAP staining and the number of osteoclasts and the growth plate thickness were determined. The serum Ca2 + levels of the mice were measured. The primary osteoblasts from the cranial bone were treated with estradiol (E2) and TPTD for 48 h, and the expressions of β-catenin and RANKL protein in the cells were analyzed.

RESULTS

The trabecular bone mass of OVX mice was significantly lower than that of sham-operated mice (P < 0.05). Continuous TPTD pumping significantly reduced tibial cancellous bone mass and femoral cortical bone area in the sham-operated mice, while in the castrated mice, TPTD pumping increased the cancellous bone mass without changing the cortical bone area. TRAP staining showed that cancellous osteoblasts in the tibia increased significantly in the castrated mice as compared with the sham-operated mice, and TPTD pumping significantly increased the number of cancellous osteoblasts in the sham-operated mice (P < 0.05). In the primary cultured osteoblasts, treatment with both E2 and TPTD obviously lowered the expression of β-catenin and increased the expression of RANKL as compared with TPTD treatment alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous pumping of TPTD promotes bone resorption in normal mice but does not produce obvious bone resorption effect in the ovariectomized mice, suggesting that castrated mice are not suitable models for studying the effect of TPTD and the related peptides on the osteoclasts.

Two-year persistence with teriparatide improved significantly after introduction of an educational and motivational support program

This study evaluated the 2-year persistence with teriparatide in the Netherlands. Analyses showed that the risk of non-persistence was 28% lower in patients who were followed according to an additional educational and motivational support program.

INTRODUCTION

Until recently, teriparatide (TPTD) was a third-line treatment option for severe osteoporosis in the Netherlands, which could only be prescribed by medical specialists based on a specific medical statement. We aimed to determine whether an educational and motivational support program (EMSP) increased 2-year treatment persistence with TPTD in patients with severe osteoporosis.

METHODS

We evaluated persistence in 1573 Dutch patients treated with TPTD from January 2013 until January 2018. From January 2013 onwards, all patients received a basic support program (BSP) consisting of an educational home visit to initiate TPTD treatment and phone calls (at 1, 2.5 and 8 weeks). Since May 2015, all patients received the EMSP consisting of the BSP extended with evaluation of medication adherence during phone calls, an additional phone call (at 12 months), and motivational letters at 9 and 14 months.

RESULTS

The EMSP showed a statistically significantly higher 2-year persistence (78%) with TPTD as compared with the BSP (72%). Reasons for treatment discontinuation were comparable between groups, except for the proportion of patients who had stopped TPTD administration due to side effects, which was significantly lower in the EMSP group (8% vs. 15% in BSP, p < 0.001). Overall, the risk of non-persistence was 28% lower in the EMSP compared with the BSP group (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.55-0.93).

CONCLUSION

The introduction of the EMSP has demonstrated to improve the persistence with TPTD, resulting in 78% of the patients being persistent with TPTD during the 2-year treatment period.

Once-weekly teriparatide reduces serum sclerostin levels in postmenopausal women with osteoprosis

Once-weekly teriparatide treatment is widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan but the mechanisms causing the increase in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine remain unknown.

METHODS

This prospective study examined the effects of once-weekly teriparatide treatment on the serum levels of sclerostin, osteocalcin, and bone formation markers as well as BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck in 32 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

RESULTS

The mean age of subjects was 76.3 ± 7.0 years old. Teriparatide significantly reduced serum sclerostin levels at 12 and 18 months in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and significantly increased serum osteocalcin levels at 3,12 and 18 months and PINP levels at 1 and 3 months, respectively. Teriparatide treatment significantly increased BMD of the lumbar spine at 6, 12, and 18 months, but did not affect BMD of the femoral neck. Examination of the relationships between percent changes in bone metabolic indices and BMD of the lumbar spine during the teriparatide treatment showed serum sclerostin changes at 3 months were negatively correlated with BMD changes of the lumbar spine at 6, 12, and 18 months. Serum osteocalcin changes were not correlated with BMD changes in the lumbar spine at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that once-weekly teriparatide treatment reduced serum sclerostin levels in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The effects of teriparatide on sclerostin may be associated with the response of the BMD of the lumbar spine.

Impact of vitamin C on teriparatide treatment in the improvement of bone mineral density, strength, and quality in vitamin C-deficient rats

Age-related decreases in serum levels of vitamin C (VC) may negatively affect the efficacy of anti-osteoporotic pharmacotherapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of VC and teriparatide (TPTD) on bone mineral density (BMD), strength, and quality in VC-deficient osteogenic disorder Shionogi (ODS) rats. Six-month-old female ODS rats were divided into an untreated ODS control group, a VC group, a TPTD group, and a VC + TPTD group, based on the administration of VC and TPTD (n = 10 each). VC was given as 2.0 mg/ml supplemented water. TPTD was administered subcutaneously once a week at 30 µg/kg body weight. After 12 weeks of treatment, BMDs of the femur and lumbar spine, bone strengths of the femoral diaphysis and metaphysis, and cancellous bone quality of proximal tibiae as estimated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were compared between groups. Compared to the ODS control group, the VC group showed significantly higher total femoral BMD, but the TPTD group showed significantly higher femoral and lumbar spinal BMD, maximum load of femoral metaphysis, and hydroxyapatite (HA) crystallinity by FTIR (p < 0.05). In addition to the increases shown in the TPTD group, the VC + TPTD group also showed significantly higher stiffness of the femoral diaphysis and breaking energy of the femoral metaphysis compared to the ODS control group (p < 0.05). These results indicated that TPTD alone increased cancellous/cortical BMD and cancellous bone strength with improvement of HA crystallinity in ODS rats, but addition of VC supplementation further improved cortical bone strength.

Optimal administration frequency and dose of teriparatide for acceleration of biomechanical healing of long-bone fracture in a mouse model

Despite preclinical studies demonstrating the effectiveness of teriparatide for skeletal repair in small animals, inconclusive data from clinical trials have raised questions regarding the optimal teriparatide dosing regimen for bone repair. To address this, we assessed the effect of teriparatide frequency and dose on long-bone healing using a mouse femur osteotomy/fracture model. Eight-week-old male ICR mice were subjected to open femur osteotomies, then randomized into following five groups (n = 8 per group): vehicle; low dose/high frequency: 3 μg/kg/dose, 3 times/day; low dose/low frequency: 9 μg/kg/dose, 1 time/day; high dose/high frequency: 9 μg/kg/dose, 3 times/day; high dose/low frequency: 27 μg/kg/dose, 1 time/day. Skeletal repair was assessed by microcomputed tomography, mechanical testing, and histology 4 weeks after surgery. High-dose and/or high-frequency teriparatide treatment increased callus bone volume but failed to have a significant impact on the biomechanical recovery of fractured femurs, possibly because of impaired cortical shell formation in fracture calluses. Meanwhile, low-dose/low-frequency teriparatide therapy enhanced callus bone formation without interfering with cortical shell formation despite a lesser increase in callus bone volume, leading to significant two and fourfold increases in ultimate load and stiffness, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that administering teriparatide at higher doses and/or higher frequencies raises fracture callus volume but does not always accelerate the biomechanical recovery of fractured bone, which points to the importance of finding the optimal teriparatide dosing regimen for accelerating skeletal repair.

Administration of teriparatide for four years cyclically compared to two years daily in treatment Naïve and alendronate treated women

PURPOSE

We evaluated if equivalent doses of TPTD given cyclically over 4-years could increase BMD >2-years of daily TPTD in 2 cohorts of women; previously untreated (Rx-Naïve) and women previously treated with ALN (ALN-Rx).

METHODS

In Rx-Naïve, women were randomized to daily TPTD for 24 months (Daily; n = 23) or cyclic TPTD for 48 months (3 months on, 3 months off; Cyclic; n = 25). In ALN-Rx, women were randomized to continued ALN plus daily TPTD for 24 months, followed by ALN alone for 24 months (Daily; n = 21) or TPTD for 48 months (3 months on, 3 months off) while ALN was continued (Cyclic; n = 20). BMD (DXA) was measured at spine (LS), total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN). The primary analysis compared 4 years of cyclic therapy to 2 years of daily therapy in RX-naïve and ALN-RX cohorts.

RESULTS

In Rx-Naïve, BMD changes at 24 months after Daily TPTD vs. 48 months after Cyclic TPTD were: LS 8.6% vs. 6.9%; TH 2.5% vs. 2.6%, and FN 1.6% vs. 2.2%. None of the BMD changes differed significantly between groups but all changes were significant over time within each group (p < 0.01 except for FN where p = 0.17 Daily; p = 0.09 Cyclic). In ALN-Rx, BMD changes at 24 months after Daily TPTD vs. 48 months after Cyclic TPTD were: LS 7.5% vs. 7.2%; TH 3.8% vs. 4.1%, and FN 3.2% vs. 2.5%. There were no differences between groups but all changes were significant within each group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The same cumulative dose of TPTD given cyclically for 4-years, does not increase BMD more than standard daily TPTD over 2-years in either Rx-Naïve or ALN-Rx women.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00668941.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Sequential Treatment of Abaloparatide Followed by Alendronate Versus Teriparatide Followed by Alendronate in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis in the United States

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration has recently approved abaloparatide (ABL) for treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) at high risk of fracture. With increasing health care spending and drug prices, it is important to quantify the value of newly available treatment options for PMO.

OBJECTIVE

To determine cost-effectiveness of ABL compared with teriparatide (TPTD) for treatment of women with PMO in the United States.

METHODS

A discrete-event simulation (DES) model was developed to assess cost-effectiveness of ABL from the US health care perspective. The model included three 18-month treatment strategies with either placebo (PBO), TPTD, or ABL, all followed by additional 5-year treatment with alendronate (ALN). High-risk patients were defined as women with PMO ⩾65 years old with a prior vertebral fracture. Baseline clinical event rates, risk reductions, and patient characteristics were based on the Abaloparatide Comparator Trial in Vertebral Endpoints (ACTIVE) trial.

RESULTS

Over a 10-year period, the DES model yielded average total discounted per-patient costs of $10 212, $46 783, and $26 837 and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 6.742, 6.781, and 6.792 for PBO/ALN, TPTD/ALN, and ABL/ALN, respectively. Compared with TPTD/ALN, ABL/ALN accrued higher QALYs at lower cost and produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $333 266/QALY relative to PBO/ALN. In high-risk women, ABL/ALN also had more QALYs and less cost over TPTD/ALN and yielded an ICER of $188 891/QALY relative to PBO/ALN. Conclusion and Relevance: ABL is a dominant treatment strategy over TPTD. In women with PMO at high risk of fracture, ABL is an alternative cost-effective treatment.

The effects of teriparatide on acceleration of bone healing following atypical femoral fracture: comparison between daily and weekly administration

We compared the effectiveness of promoting bone healing between two teriparatide preparations for atypical femoral fracture (AFF). A total of 45 AFFs were included in this study, and we compared the duration of bone union. Teriparatide administered by daily injection enhanced bone union more than weekly administration in complete AFFs.

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of teriparatide for atypical femoral fracture (AFF) has been recently reported. Although two different teriparatide preparations can be used to treat osteoporosis in Japan, daily or weekly injection, all previous reports on the effectiveness of teriparatide for AFF only examined daily injection formulations. Therefore, we compared the promotion of bone healing between the two teriparatide preparations for AFF.

METHODS

A total of 45 consecutive AFFs in 43 Japanese patients were included in this study. They received either a daily 20-μg teriparatide injection (daily group; n = 32) or a once-a-week 56.5-μg teriparatide injection (weekly group; n = 13). We compared the clinical background and duration of bone union between these two groups.

RESULTS

When all patents were included, the fracture healing time was not significantly different between the two groups. Only patients with complete AFFs had significantly fewer daily bisphosphonate or denosumab injections than the weekly group (P < 0.05). The fracture healing time in the daily group (6.1 ± 4.1 months) was significantly shorter than that in the weekly group (10.1 ± 4.2 months) (P < 0.05). Even if the influence of bisphosphonate or denosumab usage was excluded, a similar significant difference was observed in the fracture healing time (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups among patients with incomplete AFFs.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily teriparatide injections enhance bone union more than weekly injections in complete AFF patients.

Bisphosphonate and Teriparatide Use in Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of the use of either bisphosphonates or teriparatide on radiographic and functional outcomes of patients that had thoracolumbar spinal fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Controversy exists as to whether bisphosphonates interfere with successful spinal arthrodesis. An alternative osteoporosis medication is teriparatide, a synthetic parathyroid hormone that has an anabolic effect on osteoblast function. To date, there is limited comparative data on the influence of bisphosphonates or teriparatide on spinal fusion.

METHODS

A systematic search of medical reference databases was conducted for comparative studies on bisphosphonate or teriparatide use after thoracolumbar spinal fusion. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model for heterogeneity. Radiographic outcomes assessed include fusion rates, risk of screw loosening, cage subsidence, and vertebral fracture.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were noted between bisphosphonates and control groups regarding fusion rate and risk of screw loosening (fusion: odds ratio [OR] = 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-5.56, P = 0.09; loosening: OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.14-1.48, P = 0.19). Teriparatide use was associated with higher fusion rates than bisphosphonates (OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.55-3.42, P < 0.0001). However, no statistically significant difference was noted between teriparatide and bisphosphonates regarding risk of screw loosening (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.12-1.18, P = 0.09). Lastly, bisphosphonate use was associated with decreased odds of cage subsidence and vertebral fractures compared to controls (subsidence: OR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.75, P = 0.01; fracture: OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.07-0.48, P = 0.0007).

CONCLUSION

Bisphosphonates do not appear to impair successful spinal fusion compared to controls although teriparatide use is associated with higher fusion rates than bisphosphonates. In addition, bisphosphonate use is associated with decreased odds of cage subsidence and vertebral fractures compared to controls that had spinal fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Teriparatide and denosumab treatment for pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis with multiple vertebral fractures: A case study

OBJECTIVE

Pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO) is a rare disease, which can lead to vertebral fractures in women of reproductive age. No treatment strategy for PLO has been established. Here we report a case of PLO treated with teriparatide followed by denosumab, in which remarkable improvement in bone mineral density (BMD) was achieved.

CASE REPORT

A 27-year-old woman experienced severe back pain two weeks after her first delivery. PLO was diagnosed from her low BMD and multiple vertebral compression fractures. She was treated with teriparatide for 6 months, followed by denosumab. After 1 year, her BMD increase from baseline was 16.5% in L2∼4 and her pain had been relieved.

CONCLUSION

In addition to weaning, administration of teriparatide followed by denosumab led to remarkable improvement in the patient's symptoms and BMD. Therefore, we regard this method as a promising choice for the treatment of PLO.

Skeletal response to treatment with teriparatide (TPD) after bisphosphonate in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis and a high prevalence of secondary risk factors in real-life setting of a metabolic bone clinic; effect of age and vitamin D status

PURPOSE

Teriparatide (TPD) is a skeletal anabolic agent used in patients with severe post-menopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and steroid-induced osteoporosis who are at hish risk of fracture. Predictors of therapeutic response to teriparatide in real-life setting are not well characterised. We investigated potential factors associated with teriparatide response in post-menopausal women with established osteoporosis.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective survey of 48 women, aged 73.2 [7.5] years with severe osteoporosis and prevalent fractures treated with TPD according to the NICE criteria. BMD was measured at baseline, 6-12 and 18-24 months at the lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN). Bone turnover markers, serum 25 (OH)vitamin D were determined at 3-12 and 12-24 months.

RESULTS

BMD increased at 6-12 months (% change mean [SEM] 6.5 [1.1] p = 0.004) and 18-24 months (8.45 % [1.2] p<0.001) at the LS. A significant increase in BMD was observed at FN (3.1 [1.3] % p = 0.02). Changes in BMD at the TH was higher in patients younger than 73 years compared to older women (% change in BMD 4.13 [1.64] % v/s -1.7 [1.1] p = 0.007). Baseline 25 (OH) vitamin D correlated with change in P1NP at 3-12 months (r = 0.45 p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

TPD-induced changes in BMD at the TH appears may be dependent on age. Vitamin D status may influence the early anabolic effect to TPD. Our data suggest that these factors may be important considerations when initiating and optimising treatment with TPD, although further larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Impact of switching oral bisphosphonates to denosumab or daily teriparatide on the progression of radiographic joint destruction in patients with biologic-naïve rheumatoid arthritis

In biologic-naïve female RA patients, switching oral BPs to DMAb significantly reduced radiographic joint destruction compared to continuing oral BPs or switching to TPTD at 12 months, which were significantly associated with a decrease of a bone resorption marker at 6 months.

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of switching oral bisphosphonates (BPs) to denosumab (DMAb) or daily teriparatide (TPTD) on the progression of radiographic joint destruction in patients with biologic-naïve rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A retrospective, case-controlled study involving 90 female RA patients (mean age 68.2 years, 96.7% postmenopausal, disease activity score assessing 28 joints with CRP (DAS28-CRP) 2.4, methotrexate treatment 81.1%, prednisolone treatment 68.9%, and prior BP treatment 44.8 months), who were allocated depending on each patient's and physician's wishes, to (1) the BP-continue group (n = 30), (2) the switch-to-DMAb group (n = 30), or (3) the switch-to-TPTD group (n = 30), was conducted. Patients were retrospectively selected to minimize the difference of possible clinical backgrounds that may affect the joint destruction of RA. The primary endpoint was to clarify the change of the modified total Sharp score (mTSS) from baseline to 12 months.

RESULTS

After 12 months, the mean changes of the modified Sharp erosion score were significantly lower in the switch-to-DMAb group (0.2 ± 0.1; mean ± standard error) than in the switch-to-TPTD group (1.3 ± 0.5; P < 0.05), and mTSS was significantly lower in the switch-to-DMAb group (0.3 ± 0.2) than in the BP-continue group (1.0 ± 0.3; P < 0.05) and the switch-to-TPTD group (1.7 ± 0.6; P < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis showed that mTSS changes were significantly associated with the percent changes of TRACP-5b at 6 months (β = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.002-0.016; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes of systemic bone turnover induced by switching BPs to DMAb or TPTD may affect not only systemic bone mass, but also local joint destruction, and its clinical relevance should be considered comprehensively.

Assessment of the effects of switching oral bisphosphonates to denosumab or daily teriparatide in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The aim of this observational, non-randomized study was to clarify the unknown effects of switching oral bisphosphonates (BPs) to denosumab (DMAb) or daily teriparatide (TPTD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The characteristics of the 194 female patients included in the study were 183 postmenopausal, age 65.9 years, lumbar spine (LS) T score -1.8, femoral neck (FN) T score -2.3, dose and rate of taking oral prednisolone (3.6 mg/day) 75.8%, and prior BP treatment duration 40.0 months. The patients were allocated to (1) the BP-continue group (n = 80), (2) the switch-to-DMAb group (n = 74), or (3) the switch-to-TPTD group (n = 40). After 18 months, the increase in bone mineral density (BMD) was significantly greater in the switch-to-DMAb group than in the BP-continue group (LS 5.2 vs 2.3%, P < 0.01; FN 3.8 vs 0.0%, P < 0.01) and in the switch-to-TPTD group than in the BP-continue group (LS 9.0 vs 2.3%, P < 0.001; FN 4.9 vs 0.0%, P < 0.01). Moreover, the switch-to-TPTD group showed a higher LS BMD (P < 0.05) and trabecular bone score (TBS) (2.1 vs -0.7%; P < 0.05) increase than the switch-to-DMAb group. Clinical fracture incidence during this period was 8.8% in the BP-continue group, 4.1% in the switch-to-DMAb group, and 2.5% in the switch-to-TPTD group. Both the switch-to-DMAb group and the switch-to-TPTD group showed significant increases in LS and FN BMD, and the switch-to-TPTD group showed a higher increase in TBS compared to the BP-continue group at 18 months. Switching BPs to DMAb or TPTD in female RA may provide some useful osteoporosis treatment options.

Effects of bone remodeling agents following teriparatide treatment

Teriparatide is an anabolic therapy used to treat patients with osteoporosis and is only approved for 2 years of treatment. This is the first study to look at two common osteoporosis drugs in maintaining its beneficial effects: denosumab and zoledronic acid. Denosumab treatment was associated with the greatest increase in bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and lumbar spine, an amount that was statistically greater than no treatment and zoledronic acid treatment.

INTRODUCTION

Teriparatide, a hallmark treatment for osteoporosis, has been shown to increase BMD and bone turnover. This can be measured using BMD scans, N-terminal propeptide of type-1 collagen (P1NP) for bone formation and C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) for bone resorption. This study examines the effects of the two most common antiresorptive drugs prescribed following 2 years of teriparatide treatment: zoledronic acid and denosumab. The purpose of this study is to quantify the beneficial effects of teriparatide and compare the ability of each antiresorptive drug to maintain the effects.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients with prior fragility fractures were identified from a bone health clinic associated with a level I trauma center. All of the study participants completed 2 years of treatment with teriparatide between 2008 and 2013 followed by 2 years of treatment with zoledronic acid, denosumab, or no treatment. After excluding patients with insufficient laboratory data, 64 patients remained for analysis in this retrospective cohort study. Bone mineral density was measured in the lumbar spine and femoral neck.

RESULTS

Following completion of teriparatide, patients who were started on denosumab showed the largest increase in bone mineral density after 2 years of treatment: lumbar spine 4.94% ± 8.2%, femoral neck 5.68% ± 6.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who elected to discontinue osteoporosis treatment experienced a significant decline in the change in BMD compared to the change on teriparatide putting them at higher risk for recurrence of fragility fractures. Patients on denosumab following teriparatide had the largest increase in BMD.

Effect of Teriparatide Treatment on Circulating Periostin and Its Relationship to Regulators of Bone Formation and BMD in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

CONTEXT

Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with teriparatide parathyroid hormone amino terminal 1-34 increases bone formation and improves bone microarchitecture. A possible modulator of action is periostin. In vitro experiments have shown that periostin might regulate osteoblast differentiation and bone formation through Wnt signaling. The effect of teriparatide on periostin is not currently known.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of teriparatide treatment on circulating levels of periostin and other regulators of bone formation and investigate how changes in periostin relate to changes in bone turnover markers, regulators of bone formation, and bone mineral density (BMD).

PARTICIPANTS AND DESIGN

Twenty women with osteoporosis; a 2-year open-label single-arm study.

INTERVENTION

Teriparatide 20 µg was administered by subcutaneous injection daily for 104 weeks. Periostin, sclerostin, and Dickkopf-related protein 1, procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), and C-telopeptide of type I collagen were measured in fasting serum collected at baseline (two visits) and then at weeks 1, 2, 4, 12, 26, 52, 78, and 104. BMD was measured at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

Periostin levels increased by 6.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.4 to 13.5] after 26 weeks of teriparatide treatment and significantly by 12.5% (95% CI, 3.3 to 21.0; P < 0.01) after 52 weeks. The change in periostin correlated positively with the change in the lumbar spine BMD at week 52 (r = 0.567; 95% CI, 0.137 to 0.817; P < 0.05) and femoral neck BMD at week 104 (r = 0.682; 95% CI, 0.261 to 0.885; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Teriparatide therapy increases periostin secretion; it is unclear whether this increase mediates the effect of the drug on bone.

Changes of Circulating MicroRNAs in Response to Treatment With Teriparatide or Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

CONTEXT

Expression of microRNAs (miRs) related to bone metabolism in the serum may be affected by antiosteoporotic treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of two antiosteoporotic agents with opposite effects on bone metabolism on miR expression profile in the serum.

DESIGN

Observational, open label, nonrandomized clinical trial.

SETTING

The outpatient clinics for Metabolic Bone Diseases of 424 General Military Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Postmenopausal women with low bone mass were treated with either teriparatide (TPTD; n = 30) or denosumab (n = 30) for 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in the serum expression of selected miRs linked to bone metabolism at 3 and 12 months of treatment. Secondary measurements: associations of measured miRs with changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at 12 months and the bone turnover markers (BTMs) C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide at 3 and 12 months.

RESULTS

We found significantly decreased relative expression of miR-33-3p at 3 months (P = 0.03) and of miR-133a at 12 months (P = 0.042) of TPTD treatment. BMD values at 12 months of TPTD treatment were significantly and inversely correlated with miR-124-3p expression at 3 months (P = 0.008). Relative expression of miR-24-3p and miR-27a was correlated with changes in BTMs during TPTD treatment and of miR-21-5p, miR-23a-3p, miR-26a-5p, miR-27a, miR-222-5p, and miR-335-5p with changes in BTMs during denosumab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating miRs are differentially affected by treatment with TPTD and denosumab. TPTD affects the relative expression of miRs related to the expression of RUNX-2 (miR-33) and DKK-1 gene (miR-133).

Effect of osteoporosis medication on changes in bone mineral density and bone turnover markers after 24-month administration of daily teriparatide: comparison among minodronate, raloxifene, and eldecalcitol

This study reveals the changes in bone mineral density (BMD), the turnover rate, and the balance [multiple of median formation/multiple of median resorption (MoMf/MoMr)] affected by the selection of different bone resorption inhibitors after 24-month daily teriparatide (20 µg/day) administration. The turnover rate was calculated as √(MoMf² + MoMr²), where MoMf = bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) value/18.6 and MoMr = tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) value/463. One hundred and twenty-one osteoporotic women (mean age 82.4 years) were randomly administered minodronate (50 mg/28 days), raloxifene (60 mg/day), or eldecalcitol (0.75 µg/day) after teriparatide discontinuation. BMD was measured at 0, 24, and 48 weeks; BAP values and TRACP-5b were measured at 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks after administration of bone resorption inhibitors. In the minodronate group, BMD increased significantly from week 0 to weeks 24 and 48. The turnover rate was significantly reduced at week 12, and remained so over the entire course in all three groups. The speed of change of turnover rate was greatest in the minodronate group. The balance in the minodronate group shifted significantly toward formation dominance at week 12 (to 0.97 from 0.87) and then again toward resorption dominance (to 0.84) at week 24. However, no further advancement in resorption dominance was observed until week 48. Conversely, the balance in the raloxifene and eldecalcitol groups shifted toward resorption dominance gradually over the entire course. In conclusion, the BMD-increasing effect was greatest with minodronate administration and depends not only on the decrease in turnover rate but also on changes in balance after teriparatide discontinuation.

Teriparatide for treatment of patients with bisphosphonate-associated atypical fracture of the femur

The Fracture Improvement with Teriparatide (Fix-IT) study randomized 13 women with an atypical femur fracture to immediate vs delayed teriparatide therapy; all were followed for 12 months. Results suggested a trend for superior healing and lesser bone mineral density declines in the immediate vs delayed group with no differences in adverse events.

PURPOSE

Little clinical data are available on the use of teriparatide for the treatment of bisphosphonate-associated atypical femur fractures (AFF). The goal of the Fix-IT study was to determine if immediate therapy with teriparatide was superior for fracture healing after an AFF compared to a 6-month delay in teriparatide therapy.

METHODS

This randomized pilot clinical trial included 13 women with an AFF who were randomized to immediate teriparatide vs a delay of 6 months. All were followed for 12 months on teriparatide. The primary outcomes included individual and composite measures of radiologic bone healing (scored 1 point [no healing] to 4 points [complete healing]) at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included bone mineral density of the unfractured contralateral hip, spine, 1/3 distal radius, and adverse events.

RESULTS

We found there was a trend for superior healing with the composite score (12.6 vs 11.2 at 6 months and 15.4 vs 13.2 at 12 months), and lesser bone mineral density declines at the 1/3 distal radius (12-month change - 1.9 vs - 6.1%) in the immediate vs the delayed group. There were no differences in adverse events. There was one implant failure in the delayed group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a preliminary signal for greater improvements with immediate teriparatide therapy vs delayed therapy. However, because an AFF is a rare event, and only a small number of patients were included, the results must be interpreted with caution.

High dose teriparatide (rPTH1-34) therapy increases callus volume and enhances radiographic healing at 8-weeks in a massive canine femoral allograft model

Small animal studies have demonstrated significant high-dose recombinant parathyroid hormone1-34 (rPTH1-34) effects on intercalary allograft healing. Towards a human adjuvant therapy to decrease non-unions, we evaluated rPTH1-34 safety and efficacy in a clinically relevant canine femoral allograft model. Adult female mongrel hounds (n = 20) received a 5cm mid-diaphyseal osteotomy reconstructed with a plated allograft, and were randomized to: 1) Placebo (n = 5; daily saline), 2) Continuous rPTH1-34 (n = 7; 5 μg/kg/day s.c. from day 1-55 post-op), or 3) Delayed rPTH1-34 (n = 8; 5 μg/kg/day s.c. from day 14-28 post-op). Safety was assessed by physical behavior and blood calcium monitoring. Cone beam CT (CB-CT) was performed on days 14, 28 and 56 post-op to assess 2D cortical healing, 3D bone volume, and Union Ratio. Biomechanical testing and dynamic histomorphometry were also performed. The high drug dose was poorly tolerated, as most dogs receiving rPTH1-34 had to be given intravenous saline, and one dog died from hypercalcemia. Continuous rPTH1-34 significantly increased 2D healing and callus volumes at 4-weeks versus Placebo, and sustained the significant increase in cortical union at 8-week (p<0.05). These rPTH1-34 effects were confirmed by histomorphometry, revealing significant increases in mineral apposition rates (MAR) on host bone and graft-host junctions (p<0.05). Delayed rPTH1-34 significantly increased callus volume and MAR at 8 weeks (p<0.05). Although no biomechanical differences were observed, as expected for early healing, the results demonstrated that 2D RUST scoring significantly correlated with torsional biomechanics (p<0.01). In conclusion, 8-weeks of intermittent high-dose rPTH1-34 treatment significantly increases callus formation and accelerates bony union of intercalary massive allografts in a clinically relevant canine model, but with serious side-effects from hypercalcemia.

Effect of Time of Administration of Teriparatide on Bone Mineral Density in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis

Teriparatide (TPTD) (recombinant DNA origin human parathormone [1-34]) is approved for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO). There are reports of factors that affect the response to TPTD in GIO treatment. This work describes the case of a 71-yr-old woman diagnosed with lupus nephropathy treated with 40 mg/d of meprednisone, and who suffered multiple vertebral fractures. Despite treatment with a single 5 mg dose of zoledronic acid, the patient continued to have vertebral fractures. Treatment with 20 µg/d of subcutaneous TPTD (PTH1-34, Forteo; Eli Lilly Co., Indianapolis, IN) was initiated. Nine months after the onset of treatment, bone mineral density (BMD) assessment showed a 5% decrease in lumbar spine BMD. Factors potentially affecting the results were analyzed. The patient reported injecting TPTD at night and was instructed to inject TPTD in the morning before breakfast. After changing the time of TPTD administration and 22 mo after initiating treatment, BMD assessment was repeated and showed an 18% increase at the lumbar spine and no new vertebral fractures. The time of TPTD administration might affect the response to TPTD in GIO treatment.