Baseline serum PINP level is associated with the increase in hip bone mineral density seen with Romosozumab treatment in previously untreated women with osteoporosis

Baseline serum PINP value was significantly and independently associated with the increased bone mineral density (≥ 3%) in both total hip and femoral necks by 12 months of romosozumab treatment in patients with treatment-naive postmenopausal osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

Some patients fail to obtain a sufficiently increased hip bone mineral density (BMD) by romosozumab (ROMO) treatment. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factor for increased hip BMD with ROMO in patients with treatment-naive postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

This prospective, observational, and multicenter study included patients (n = 63: mean age, 72.6 years; T-scores of the lumbar spine [LS], - 3.3; total hip [TH], - 2.6; femoral neck [FN], - 3.3; serum type I procollagen N-terminal propeptide [PINP], 68.5 µg/L) treated by ROMO for 12 months. BMD and serum bone turnover markers were evaluated at each time point. A responder analysis was performed to assess the patient percentage, and both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the factors associated with clinically significant increased BMD (≥ 3%) in both TH and FN.

RESULTS

Percentage changes of BMD from baseline in the LS, TH, and FN areas were 17.5%, 4.9%, and 4.3%, respectively. In LS, 96.8% of patients achieved ≥ 6% increased LS-BMD, although 57.1% could not achieve ≥ 3% increased BMD in either TH or FN. Multiple regression analysis revealed that only the baseline PINP value was significantly and independently associated with ≥ 3% increased BMD in both TH and FN (p = 0.019, 95% confidence interval = 1.006-1.054). The optimal cut-off PINP value was 53.7 µg/L with 54.3% sensitivity and 92.3% specificity (area under the curve = 0.752).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world setting, baseline PINP value was associated with the increased BMD of TH and FN by ROMO treatment in treatment-naive patients.

Pharmacological interventions versus placebo, no treatment or usual care for osteoporosis in people with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5D

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for osteoporosis and is more prevalent among people with CKD than among people who do not have CKD. Although several drugs have been used to effectively treat osteoporosis in the general population, it is unclear whether they are also effective and safe for people with CKD, who have altered systemic mineral and bone metabolism.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for osteoporosis in patients with CKD stages 3-5, and those undergoing dialysis (5D).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 25 January 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing any anti-osteoporotic drugs with a placebo, no treatment or usual care in patients with osteoporosis and CKD stages 3 to 5D were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed their quality using the risk of bias tool, and extracted data. The main outcomes were the incidence of fracture at any sites; mean change in the bone mineral density (BMD; measured using dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry (DXA)) of the femoral neck, total hip, lumbar spine, and distal radius; death from all causes; incidence of adverse events; and quality of life (QoL). Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies involving 9164 randomised participants with osteoporosis and CKD stages 3 to 5D met the inclusion criteria; all participants were postmenopausal women. Five studies included patients with CKD stages 3-4, and two studies included patients with CKD stages 5 or 5D. Five pharmacological interventions were identified (abaloparatide, alendronate, denosumab, raloxifene, and teriparatide). All studies were judged to be at an overall high risk of bias. Among patients with CKD stages 3-4, anti-osteoporotic drugs may reduce the risk of vertebral fracture (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.69; low certainty evidence). Anti-osteoporotic drugs probably makes little or no difference to the risk of clinical fracture (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.05; moderate certainty evidence) and adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00; moderate certainty evidence). We were unable to incorporate studies into the meta-analyses for BMD at the femoral neck, lumbar spine and total hip as they only reported the percentage change in the BMD in the intervention group. Among patients with severe CKD stages 5 or 5D, it is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug reduces the risk of clinical fracture (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.87; very low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug improves the BMD at the femoral neck because the certainty of this evidence is very low (MD 0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.02). Anti-osteoporotic drug may slightly improve the BMD at the lumbar spine (MD 0.03, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.04, low certainty evidence). No adverse events were reported in the included studies. It is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug reduces the risk of death (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.22 to 4.56; very low certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CKD stages 3-4, anti-osteoporotic drugs may reduce the risk of vertebral fracture in low certainty evidence. Anti-osteoporotic drugs make little or no difference to the risk of clinical fracture and adverse events in moderate certainty evidence. Among patients with CKD stages 5 and 5D, it is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug reduces the risk of clinical fracture and death because the certainty of this evidence is very low. Anti-osteoporotic drug may slightly improve the BMD at the lumbar spine in low certainty evidence. It is uncertain whether anti-osteoporotic drug improves the BMD at the femoral neck because the certainty of this evidence is very low. Larger studies including men, paediatric patients or individuals with unstable CKD-mineral and bone disorder are required to assess the effect of each anti-osteoporotic drug at each stage of CKD.

Beneficial effects of switching to denosumab from bisphosphonates or selective estrogen receptor modulators in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes and osteopenia/osteoporosis

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a higher bone fracture risk than patients without diabetes. Although denosumab (Dmab) is a potent bone resorption inhibitor, its efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus has not been elucidated. In this study, we investigated the effects of switching to Dmab from bisphosphonates (BP) or a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) in postmenopausal type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a three medical institutions, prospective, observational study for postmenopausal patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose T-score of femoral neck or lumbar spine bone mineral density was under -1.0 standard deviation, even after >6 months of BP or SERM administration. After obtaining consent, participants were treated for osteopenia/osteoporosis by either continuing BP (BP-BP group)/SERM (SERM-SERM group), or by switching to Dmab (BP-Dmab or SERM-Dmab groups). Changes in bone mineral density and bone metabolism marker levels were evaluated after 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients were included in this study, and each group comprised 12 patients. No significant difference existed in baseline characteristics among the groups. The average age and glycated hemoglobin were 71 ± 8 years and 7.2 ± 0.9%, respectively. In the SERM-Dmab group, lumbar spine bone mineral density was significantly increased by 5.0% compared with the SERM-SERM group (P < 0.04). Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b were significantly decreased in the BP-Dmab and SERM-Dmab groups compared with the BP-BP and SERM-SERM groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to Dmab from BP or SERM is beneficial to prevent osteoporosis progression in postmenopausal patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Off-treatment bone mineral density changes in postmenopausal women receiving anastrozole for 5 years: 7-year results from the IBIS-II prevention trial

BACKGROUND

Anastrozole has been associated with substantial accelerated bone mineral density (BMD) loss during active treatment.

METHODS

One thousand four hundred and ten women were included in a BMD substudy and stratified into three strata according to their baseline T-score at spine or femoral neck. The primary objective of this analysis was to investigate whether DXA BMD at the spine and hip changed two years after treatment cessation (between years 5 and 7) in those who did not receive risedronate.

RESULTS

Five- and seven-year BMD data were available for a total of 528 women who did not receive risedronate. In women with normal BMD at baseline, an increase in BMD at the lumbar spine after anastrozole withdrawal was observed 1.25% (95% CI 0.73 to 1.77) (P = 0.0004), which was larger than in those on placebo (0.14% (-0.29 to 0.56))). At the hip, BMD remained unchanged between years 5 and 7 for those previously on anastrozole but continued to a decrease in those who had been randomised to placebo (-1.35% (-1.70 to -0.98)).

CONCLUSIONS

These are the first results reporting BMD changes after stopping anastrozole in a breast cancer prevention setting. Our results show that the negative effects of anastrozole on BMD in the preventive setting are partially reversible.

Effect of Tissue-Selective Estrogen Complex on Hip Structural Geometry in Postmenopausal Women: A 12-Month Study

BACKGROUND

Hip structural analysis (HSA) is a method for evaluating bone geometry reflecting bone structural and biomechanical properties. However, tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC) treatment effects on HSA have not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to evaluate the effect of TSEC treatment on hip geometry in postmenopausal Korean women. The treatment was given for 12 months, and hip geometry was measured by HSA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 40 postmenopausal women who received TSEC containing conjugated estrogen 0.45 mg and bazedoxifene 20 mg for treating vasomotor symptoms were included in this retrospective cohort study. The changes in bone mineral density and parameters of HSA including the outer diameter, cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, cortical thickness, section modulus, and buckling ratio as determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were compared before and after 12 months of TSEC treatment.

RESULTS

Mean age and years since menopause were 55.1 and 4.5 years, respectively. Total hip bone mineral density significantly increased by 0.74% after treatment (P=0.011). The changes in HSA were mainly demonstrated in the narrow femoral neck: cross-sectional area (P=0.003) and cortical thickness (P<0.001) increased significantly. For the shaft region, only SM decreased significantly after treatment (P=0.009). However, most parameters did not change significantly with TSEC treatment in the intertrochanteric and shaft regions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that 12 months of TSEC treatment could improve bone geometry as measured by HSA. The findings suggest that TSEC might be an interesting option for the prevention of fracture as well as osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Aromatase inhibitors attenuate the effect of alendronate in women with breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Aromatase inhibitors are known to accelerate bone loss in patients with breast cancer. However, how much AIs affect the efficacy of antiresorptive agents has not been studied. The study aimed to compare the effect of alendronate on bone mineral density (BMD) between patients with and without AI treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 90 postmenopausal women with early breast cancer who were being treated with both AI and alendronate 70 mg weekly (ALN + AI), and 90 age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched patients who were only taking alendronate (ALN-only) were analyzed. BMD and bone turnover markers (BTMs) were assessed at the baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS

The mean age was 63 years. At baseline, the ALN-only group had lower lumbar spine (LS), femur neck (FN), and total hip (TH) BMD than ALN + AI group. After 1-year of alendronate treatment, the LS and FN BMD were improved more in the ALN-only group than those in the ALN + AI group after adjustments for age, BMI, baseline BMD, diabetes, hypertension, renal function, and previous fracture history [LS BMD: 6.2% (3.1%; 9.2%) in ALN-only, 3.5% (-0.5%; 6.5%) in ALN + AI, p = 0.001; FN BMD: 2.5% (0.3%; 5.7%) in ALN-only, 0.9% (- 1.8%; 3.6%) in ALD + AI, p = 0.032]. BTMs were significantly decreased in both groups, but the changes between groups were similar.

CONCLUSION

The effect of alendronate on the LS and FN BMD was attenuated in postmenopausal women who were taking AI compared to those who were not on AI.

Effects of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Bone Mass After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on bone mineral density (BMD) in young women who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort included 234 female patients with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) who underwent allogeneic HSCT between April 2009 and April 2016 at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital in Seoul, Korea. Inclusion criteria included adult patients who were age 40 years or younger at the time of transplantation and were followed for at least 3 years after HSCT.

RESULTS

At the first and second years after HRT, there was a significant increase in the BMD of the lumbar spine of the HRT group (n = 170) compared to that of the non-HRT group (n = 64) (P = .033 and P = .047, respectively). The BMD of the lumbar spine significantly increased from baseline by 4.16 ± 4.39% and 5.42 ± 5.86% after 1 and 2 years of HRT, respectively (P = .037 and P = .021). The BMD of the femoral neck and total hip also showed a significant percentage increase from baseline after 2 years of HRT. These changes were significant even in the presence of graft-versus-host disease or steroid exposure. For HRT that was initiated within 12 months after HSCT, the increase in BMD in the lumbar spine was greatest after 2 years of HRT.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support that early and active hormonal therapy might be beneficial for BMD in female HSCT recipients with POI.

Dietary Advanced Glycation End-Products (dAGEs) Intake and Bone Health: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in the Rotterdam Study

Animal studies suggest a role for dietary advanced glycation end-products (dAGEs) in bone health, but human studies on dAGEs in relation to bone are lacking. We aimed to study whether dAGEs intake is associated with the parameters of bone strength namely, bone mineral density (BMD), prevalent vertebral (VFs), and major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs = hip, wrist, proximal humerus, and clinical VFs). 3949 participants (mean age 66.7 ± 10.5 years) were included from a Rotterdam study for whom Carboxymethyllysine (CML—a dietary AGE) was estimated from food frequency questionnaires combined with dAGEs databases. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were performed adjusting for age, sex, energy intake, dietary quality, physical activity, diabetes, smoking, renal function, and cohort effect and for models on fractures, subsequently for BMD. We observed no association of CML with BMD at both femoral neck (β = −0.006; p = 0.70) and lumbar spine (β = −0.013; p = 0.38). A higher intake of CML was linearly associated with VFs (Odds ratio, OR = 1.16, 95% CI (1.02–1.32) and a similar but non-significant trend with MOFs (OR = 1.12 (0.98–1.27). Additional adjustment for BMD did not change the associations. Our results imply a positive association between dietary intake of CML and VFs independent of BMD. Future studies are needed in order to elucidate whether associations found are causal.

Eldecalcitol is superior to alfacalcidol in maintaining bone mineral density in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis patients (e-GLORIA)

INTRODUCTION

Eldecalcitol increases bone mineral density (BMD) and reduces vertebral fracture in patients with primary osteoporosis. However, the effect of eldecalcitol on BMD and fracture in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) patients is unknown. This study was undertaken to compare the effect of eldecalcitol on BMD and fracture with that of alfacalcidol in GIO patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized, open-label, parallel group study was conducted to identify the effectiveness and safety of monotherapy with 0.75 μg eldecalcitol compared with 1.0 μg alfacalcidol in GIO patients.

RESULTS

Lumbar spine BMD increased with eldecalcitol, but decreased with alfacalcidol at 12 and 24 months (between group difference 1.29%, p < 0.01, and 1.10%, p < 0.05, respectively). Total hip and femoral neck BMD were maintained until 24 months by eldecalcitol, but decreased by alfacalcidol (between group difference 0.97%, p < 0.05 and 1.22%, p < 0.05, respectively). Both bone formation and resorption markers were more strongly suppressed by eldecalcitol than by alfacalcidol. Eldecalcitol showed better effect on BMD than alfacalcidol in patients with no prevalent fracture and BMD > 70% of the young adult mean, and with ≤ 3 months of previous glucocorticoid treatment. No significant difference in the incidence of vertebral fracture was found, and the incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Eldecalcitol was more effective than alfacalcidol in maintaining BMD in GIO patients. Because eldecalcitol was effective in patients with no or short-term previous glucocorticoid treatment, as well as those without prevalent fracture or low BMD, eldecalcitol can be a good candidate for primary prevention of GIO.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000011700.

Comparison between teriparatide and bisphosphonates for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of teriparatide and bisphosphonates in managing postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials that were published before April 2018 and compared teriparatide and bisphosphonates in treating postmenopausal osteoporosis. Stata 12.0 was used for the meta-analysis. The pooled risk ratio (RR) or weighted mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a fixed effects or random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 14 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. The teriparatide group was associated with a lower total occurrence of vertebral fractures (RR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.40-0.77; P = .001) and nonvertebral fractures (RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.90; P = .009) than the bisphosphonate group. Moreover, compared with the bisphosphonate group, the teriparatide group had improved bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck at the final follow-up (P < .05). There was no significant difference between the teriparatide and bisphosphonate groups in terms of complications (RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.90, 1.22, P = .516).

CONCLUSIONS

Teriparatide significantly reduced the occurrence of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in osteoporosis patients. More studies should focus on the quality of life of patients using these 2 drugs.

Effect of Abaloparatide vs Alendronate on Fracture Risk Reduction in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

CONTEXT

The ACTIVE study demonstrated the antifracture efficacy of abaloparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. ACTIVExtend demonstrated sustained fracture risk reduction with alendronate in abaloparatide-treated participants from ACTIVE. A direct comparison of the efficacy of abaloparatide and antiresorptive therapies has not been performed.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this analysis is to compare the antifracture efficacy of abaloparatide in ACTIVE with that of alendronate in ACTIVExtend.

DESIGN

In this post hoc analysis, the rate of new vertebral fractures for women in ACTIVExtend (N = 1139) was calculated based on baseline and endpoint radiographs for placebo or abaloparatide in ACTIVE and alendronate in ACTIVExtend. Vertebral fracture rates between abaloparatide and alendronate were compared in a Poisson regression model. Fracture rates for nonvertebral and clinical fractures were compared based on a Poisson model during 18 months of abaloparatide or placebo treatment in ACTIVE and 18 months of alendronate treatment in ACTIVExtend.

RESULTS

The vertebral fracture rate was lower during abaloparatide treatment in ACTIVE (0.47 fractures/100 patient-years) than alendronate treatment in ACTIVExtend (1.66 fractures/100 patient-years) (relative risk reduction 71%; P = .027). Although the comparisons did not meet statistical significance, after switching from placebo (ACTIVE) to alendronate (ACTIVExtend), the rate of new vertebral fractures decreased from 2.49 to 1.66 fractures per 100 patient-years, and after switching from abaloparatide to alendronate from 0.47 to 0.19 fractures per 100 patient-years. The rates of nonvertebral fractures and clinical fractures were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Initial treatment with abaloparatide may result in greater vertebral fracture reduction compared with alendronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Bone Mineral Density Response With Denosumab in Combination With Standard or High-Dose Teriparatide: The DATA-HD RCT

CONTEXT

In the Denosumab and High-Dose Teriparatide Administration (DATA-HD) study, we reported that 15 months of combined high-dose (HD) teriparatide and denosumab increased mean areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the hip and spine more than combined denosumab and standard-dose (SD) teriparatide.

OBJECTIVE

In the current analysis, we compare the individual rates of aBMD response between the treatment groups.

DESIGN

Single-site, open-label, randomized controlled trial in which postmenopausal women received either teriparatide 20-μg daily (SD) or 40-μg daily (HD) given months 0 through 9, overlapped with denosumab 60 mg, given months 3 through 15 (15 months' total duration). The proportion of participants in the SD and HD groups experiencing total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine aBMD gains of >3%, >6%, and >9% were compared.

PARTICIPANTS

Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis completing all study visits (n = 60).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

aBMD (dual x-ray absorptiometry).

RESULTS

At the end of the 15-month treatment period, a higher proportion of women in the HD group had aBMD increases >3% (83% vs. 58%, P = .037) and >6% (45% vs. 19%, P = .034) at the total hip, and >3% at the femoral neck (86% vs. 63%, P = .044). At the lumbar spine, >3% response rates were similar, whereas the >6% and >9% response rates were greater in the HD group (100% vs. 79%, P = .012 and 93% vs. 59%, P = .003, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the SD regimen, more women treated with the HD regimen achieved clinically meaningful and rapid gains in hip and spine aBMD. These results suggest that this approach may provide unique benefits in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Prospective Study Evaluating Changes in Bone Quality in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Adjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Ovarian suppression from chemotherapy results in bone loss in premenopausal women with breast cancer (BC). Less is known about bone microarchitecture changes. We used high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to measure volumetric bone density and trabecular and cortical microarchitecture in this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The primary endpoint was to assess changes in cortical thickness and trabecular bone density by HR-pQCT. Premenopausal women with stage I to III BC undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy underwent a bone mineral density (BMD) dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan and HR-pQCT (voxel size, 82 microns) at baseline and 12 months. Paired t tests were used to observe the change over time in bone microarchitecture and areal and volumetric density.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were evaluated, of which 12 patients had baseline and matched 12-month imaging. The mean age was 45.2 years (range, 35-51 years), 17 (94%) patients had hormone receptor-positive BC, and 16 (89%) initiated tamoxifen. At 12 months, there was a significant decrease in femoral neck (P < .05) and lumbar spine and total hip (P < .01) BMD. Changes detected by HR-pQCT at 12 months included significant decreases in cortical thickness and area at the tibia (P < .05), and total and cortical volumetric BMD at the radius and tibia (P < .01), as well as an increase in tibial trabecular area (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Premenopausal women undergoing chemotherapy experience BMD decline and trabecular and cortical bone microarchitecture deterioration. In this population, future efforts should focus on therapy-induced bone loss and optimizing bone density-related management.

Comparison of Teriparatide and Denosumab in Patients Switching From Long-Term Bisphosphonate Use

CONTEXT

Teriparatide and denosumab are effective treatments for osteoporosis and typically reserved as second-line options after patients have used bisphosphonates. However, limited head-to-head comparative effectiveness data exist between teriparatide and denosumab.

OBJECTIVE

We compared changes in bone mineral density (BMD) between groups treated with teriparatide or denosumab after using bisphosphonates, focusing on the change in BMD while on either drug over 2 years.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study using electronic medical records from two academic medical centers in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

The study population included osteoporotic patients >45 years who received bisphosphonates >1 year before switching to teriparatide or denosumab.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Annualized BMD change from baseline at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck.

RESULTS

Patients treated with teriparatide (n = 110) were compared with those treated with denosumab (n = 105); the mean (SD) age was 70 (10) years and median duration (interquartile range) of bisphosphonate use was 7.0 (5.6 to 9.7) years. Compared with denosumab users, teriparatide users had higher annualized BMD change at the spine by 1.3% (95% CI 0.02, 2.7%) but lower at the total hip by -2.2% (95% CI -2.9 to -1.5%) and the femoral neck by -1.1% (95% CI -2.1 to -0.1%). Those who switched to teriparatide had a transient loss of hip BMD for the first year, with no overall increase in the total hip BMD over 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who use long-term bisphosphonates, the decision of switching to teriparatide should be made with caution, especially for patients at high risk of hip fracture.

Eldecalcitol increases bone mineral density in Chinese osteoporotic patients without vitamin D or calcium supplementation

Eldecalcitol increased bone mineral density (BMD) and prevented vertebral fractures in vitamin D-sufficient osteoporotic subjects. However, the effect of eldecalcitol on BMD under vitamin D insufficiency is unknown. We examined the effect of eldecalcitol on BMD compared with alfacalcidol in osteoporotic patients without vitamin D or calcium supplementation. This is a randomized, double-blind, active comparator trial. 265 Chinese osteoporotic patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.75 μg eldecalcitol or 1.0 μg alfacalcidol for 12 months without vitamin D or calcium supplementation. Baseline calcium intakes were less than 550 mg/day and mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] was below 43 nmol/L in both groups. Baseline BMD tended to be lower in patients with lower calcium intake and serum 25(OH)D. Lumbar BMD increased by 2.05% higher in eldecalcitol than alfacalcidol group at 12 months. Total hip and femoral neck BMD also increased by 1.33 and 1.78%, respectively, in the eldecalcitol than the alfacalcidol group. The effect of eldecalcitol on BMD was not affected by serum 25(OH)D or calcium intake. The incidence of adverse events was not different between the two groups. Incidence of hypercalcemia in the edecalcitol group was not affected by serum 25(OH)D. In conclusion, baseline BMD tended to be lower in patients with low calcium intake and serum 25(OH)D. Eldecalcitol increased lumbar and hip BMD more than alfacalcidol regardless of serum 25(OH)D or calcium intake without vitamin D or calcium supplementation. These results suggest that eldecalcitol is effective in increasing the BMD of osteoporotic patients regardless of vitamin D status or calcium intake.Clinical Trial Registration number JAPIC CTI 152904.

Predictive factors for the efficacy of denosumab in postmenopausal Japanese women with non-metastatic breast cancer receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors: a combined analysis of two prospective clinical trials

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the gold standard therapy for breast cancer in postmenopausal women. AI suppresses the conversion of androgens to estrogens; however, this results in osteopenia, osteoporosis, and bone fracture, thus reducing the patient's quality of life. The use of adjuvant denosumab reduces the risk of clinical fractures in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer receiving AI. However, the efficacy of denosumab in the treatment of AI-associated bone loss has not been prospectively evaluated in Japan. In this study, we aimed to investigate the predictive factors for the efficacy of denosumab in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with AI by analyzing the results of two prospective trials. The patients received 60 mg denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months. The primary endpoint was percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline to month 12 in lumbar spine. Post hoc analysis and T tests were performed. A total of 205 patients were enrolled. At 12 and 24 months, the lumbar spine BMD increased by 5.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9-6.3] and 8.3% (95% CI 7.5-9.1), respectively. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the time of AI therapy initiation, type of AI therapy, age, time since menopause, baseline body mass index, and BMD. The results showed that baseline lumbar and left femoral BMD was significantly associated with a percentage change in these sites, respectively. In addition, baseline left femoral BMD was also associated with a change in lumbar BMD. In conclusion, the baseline BMD in the lumbar spine was a predictive indicator for the efficacy of denosumab in this site and the baseline BMD in left femoral neck was a predictive indicator in lumbar spine and left femur.

Which is the preferred site for bone mineral density monitoring as an indicator of treatment-related anti-fracture effect in routine clinical practice? A registry-based cohort study

Change in total hip bone mineral density (BMD) provides a robust indication of anti-fracture effect during treatment monitoring in routine clinical practice, whereas spine BMD change is not independently associated with fracture risk.

PURPOSE

The role of monitoring bone mineral density (BMD) as an indicator of an anti-fracture effect is controversial. Discordance between the spine and hip BMD is common and creates uncertainty in clinical practice.

METHODS

Using a population-based BMD Registry for the Province of Manitoba, Canada, we compared change in the spine and hip BMD as an indicator of treatment-related fracture risk reduction. The study cohort included 6093 women age > 40 years initiating osteoporosis treatment with two consecutive dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans (mean interval 4.7 years). We computed change in the spine, total hip, and femur neck BMD between the first and second DXA scans as categorical (categorized as stable, detectable decrease, or detectable increase) and continuous measures. We modeled time to first incident fracture, ascertained from health services data, using Cox regression adjusted for baseline fracture probability.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 12.1 years, 995 women developed incident major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) including 246 with hip fractures and 301 with clinical vertebral fractures. Women with a detectable decrease in total hip BMD compared with stable BMD experienced an increase in MOF (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.70) while those with a detectable increase in total hip BMD experienced a decrease in MOF (aHR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61-0.83), and these results were not attenuated when adjusted for change in spine BMD. Similar results were seen for hip and clinical vertebral fracture outcomes, when BMD change was assessed as a continuous measure, and when femur neck BMD monitoring was used instead of total hip BMD monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment-related increases in total hip BMD are associated with lower MOF, hip, and clinical vertebral fracture risk compared with stable BMD, while BMD decreases are associated with higher fracture risk. In contrast, spine BMD change is not independently associated with fracture risk.

Therapy of moderate-to-severe Graves' orbitopathy with intravenous methylprednisolone pulses is not associated with loss of bone mineral density

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) pulse administration on bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and the femoral neck in patients with moderate-to-severe Graves' orbitopathy (GO).

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with GO in euthyreosis were treated with 12 IVMP pulses (6 × 0.5 g, 6 × 0.25 g on a weekly schedule). Supplementation with 1.0 g of calcium and 800 IU of vitamin D was initiated in all patients before beginning therapy. BMD of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and the femoral neck were assessed at baseline and after the last IVMP pulse using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. To determine differences in BMD between values at baseline and after treatment, we used the least significant change (LSC) methodology. LSC values were calculated to be 3 and 5% for the lumbar spine and the femoral neck, respectively. Change in BMD equal to or exceeding the LSC was assessed as either increase or decrease of BMD. We then compared pre-treatment and post-treatment mean BMD values at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck.

RESULTS

We did not observe a decrease of BMD at any site equal to or exceeding the LSC. We found an increase of BMD in at least one measurement site equal to or exceeding the LSC value in 43% of patients, mostly in the lumbar spine (31%). Mean femoral neck BMD did not change while mean lumbar BMD increased.

CONCLUSIONS

IVMP given in weekly intravenous pulses does not lead to loss of BMD of the lumbar spine and the femoral neck.

Effect of Endogenous Parathyroid Hormone on Bone Geometry and Skeletal Microarchitecture

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) has anabolic or catabolic effects on bones; however, the skeletal effect of endogenous PTH on cortical and trabecular bones is not yet clear. Therefore, we aimed to examine the effects of an excess and a deficiency of endogenous PTH on the lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS) and bone geometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. We retrospectively included 70 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), 26 patients with idiopathic or postoperative hypoparathyroidism (HypoPT), and 96 normal controls matched by age, sex, and body mass index. The bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femur neck, and total hip was higher in the HypoPT, followed by the controls and PHPT group (all P < 0.001). The TBS was significantly decreased in the PHPT group compared to the controls (P = 0.021); however, statistical significance disappeared after adjusting for the lumbar BMD (P = 0.653). There were no significant differences in the TBS between the HypoPT group and controls as well as the PHPT and HypoPT group. As for bone geometry parameters, the cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, and section modulus were higher in the HypoPT, followed by the controls and PHPT group (all P < 0.001); statistical significance remained after adjusting for the total hip BMD. We also observed a significantly increased cortical neck width in the HypoPT group compared to the PHPT group (P = 0.009). The buckling ratio was higher in the PHPT than the HypoPT group and controls (P = 0.018 and P = 0.013, respectively). The present study demonstrated that an excess of endogenous PTH had catabolic effects on both cortical and trabecular bones. Under conditions of endogenous PTH deficiency, the effect on cortical bone was pronounced, but that on trabecular bone was modest.

Serum homocysteine levels are affected by renal function during a 3-year period of minodronate therapy in female osteoporotic patients

Serum homocysteine is a possible marker to indicate bone quality. However, it is not clear whether changes are seen in serum homocysteine levels with long-term bisphosphonate therapy. We aimed to investigate the factors affecting serum homocysteine levels during a 3-year period of monthly minodronate therapy in osteoporotic women, and to examine if the serum homocysteine levels could reflect some aspects of bone metabolism. The study included 43 patients (age 72.3 ± 7.0 years) undergoing treatment for osteoporosis for the first time (New group) and 35 patients (age 74.4 ± 8.2 years) who switched from alendronate or risedronate to minodronate (Switch group). Minodronate (50 mg/every 4 weeks) was administered for 36 months. Lumbar, femoral neck, and total hip bone mineral densities (BMD), and serum homocysteine levels were monitored at baseline and after 9, 18, 27, and 36 months of treatment. Lumbar BMD increased significantly in both groups (New group 11.4%, Switch group 6.2%). However, femoral neck and total hip BMDs increased only in the New group (femoral neck 3.6%, total hip 4.1%). Serum homocysteine levels increased significantly at 18 and 27 months in all subjects. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that changes in homocysteine levels during 18, 27, and 36 months significantly correlated with changes in creatinine clearance during the same corresponding periods (18 months: B = - 0.472, p = 0.003; 27 months: B = - 0.375, p = 0.021; 36 months: B = - 0.445, p = 0.012). Thus, serum homocysteine levels possibly reflect renal function instead of bone metabolism during minodronate therapy.

Bone health evaluation one year after aromatase inhibitors completion

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) experience increased bone loss during their treatment. However, there is little information about bone mineral density (BMD) after completing AI-treatment. The present study aimed to assess BMD changes one year after AI-therapy completion.

METHODS

Data were collected from 864 postmenopausal women treated with AI during 5 years (5y-AI group), or during 2-3 years after taking tamoxifen therapy (pTAM-AI group). Participants with osteoporosis were treated with oral bisphosphonates (BP). BMD changes in lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) between baseline, end of treatment, and at one year post-treatment were assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA.

RESULTS

At the end of AI-treatment, 382 patients had available BMD values and 316 also had post-treatment BMD values. As expected, BMD levels were decreased at AI-completion in non-BP treated patients. After one year, LS BMD increased in both groups (5y-AI: +2.11% [95%CI: 1.55 to 2.68], p < 0.001; pTAM-AI: +1.00% [95%CI: 0.49 to 1.51], p < 0.001) compared with the end of AI-therapy, while values at FN and TH remained stable. On the other hand, BMD values of BP-treated patients were increased or maintained at the end of AI-treatment and also at post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

At one year after AI-completion, FN and TH BMD remained reduced in non-BP treated women, while LS BMD was recovered in the 5y-AI group and partially recovered in the pTAM-AI group. BP treatment increased or maintained BMD values at the end of therapy and at one year post-treatment.

The effect of suppressive thyroxine therapy in nodular goiter in postmenopausal women and 2 year's bone mineral density change

The efficacy of thyroxine suppressive therapy in reducing nodular growth and its effect to bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women is still debated. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of thyroxine and its influence on BMD. Postmenopausal women with nodular or multinodular goiter during 2013-2015 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were enrolled and retrospectively traced back to the first date of visit or treatment. Ninety-four eligible patients were enrolled, of whom 45 were thyroxine-treated (LT-4 group) and 49 were treatment-naïve (control group). Data, including volume of nodules, were analyzed retrospectively. BMD was measured in each LT-4 group patient since the year of enrollment. Nodular volumes were reduced in both LT-4 (from 4.89 ± 4.46 to 4.10 ± 4.57 mL, p = 0.033) and control group (3.48 ± 4.36 to 3.09 ± 2.88 mL, p = 0.239) at initial 2-year follow-up. Nodular volume in LT-4 group increased insignificantly (from 4.89 ± 4.46 to 4.91 ± 5.40 mL, p = 0.711) at the end of 7-year follow-up. The best cut-off predictive nodular volume that may have responded to thyroxine is 2.6 mL (AUC, 0.740; sensitivity, 0.750; specificity, 0.733) during first 2 year. Lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck BMD were not significantly changed during 2 year's thyroxine suppression therapy. In conclusion, thyroxine suppressive therapy in postmenopausal women had significant reduction in nodule volume at initial 2 years of treatment, especially in volume larger than 2.6 mL. Prolonged thyroxine treatment did not benefit nodular size reduction and may affect BMD minimally in postmenopausal women.

Long-term effect of testosterone replacement therapy on bone in hypogonadal men with Klinefelter Syndrome

PURPOSE

To assess different aspects of bone damage in untreated adult patients with Klinefelter Syndrome (KS) before and during testosterone replacement therapy (TRT).

METHODS

Fifteen untreated hypogonadal men with KS and 26 control subjects (C) matched for age and BMI were recruited. Sex hormone levels were measured in all subjects. Lumbar spine (LS) and femoral (neck: FN and total hip: TH) bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), hip structure analysis (HSA) and fat measures (percentage of fat mass, android/gynoid ratio and visceral adipose tissue) were evaluated by DEXA. In KS patients, blood analysis and DEXA measurements were assessed at baseline and repeated yearly for three years during TRT.

RESULTS

Fat measures were significantly higher in KS than C (p < 0.01). In contrast, mean LS, FN and TH BMD were significantly reduced in KS compared to C (p < 0.01), while there was no difference in TBS. HSA revealed a significantly lower cortical thickness and significantly higher buckling ratio in KS compared to C at all femoral sites (p < 0.01). In KS patients, TRT significantly increased BMD at LS only, but did not improve TBS and HSA parameters. Fat measures were inversely associated with TBS values, and TRT did not influence this relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

In untreated hypogonadal men with KS, lumbar and femoral BMD was reduced, and femoral bone quality was impaired. Adiposity seemed to have a detrimental effect on lumbar bone microarchitecture, as indirectly evaluated by TBS. However, TRT failed to remedy these negative effects on bone.

ACTIVExtend: 24 Months of Alendronate After 18 Months of Abaloparatide or Placebo for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

PURPOSE

In women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, we investigated the effects of 24 months of treatment with alendronate (ALN) following 18 months of treatment with abaloparatide (ABL) or placebo (PBO).

METHODS

Women who completed ABL or PBO treatment in ACTIVE were eligible to receive up to 24 months of ALN. We evaluated the incidence of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) during the entire 43-month period from ACTIVE baseline to the end of ACTIVExtend and for the 24-month extension only.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-eight women from ACTIVE's ABL group and 581 from its PBO group (92% of ABL and PBO completers) were enrolled. During the full 43-month treatment period, 0.9% of evaluable women in the ABL/ALN group experienced a new radiographic vertebral fracture vs 5.6% of women in the PBO/ALN group, an 84% relative risk reduction (RRR, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier incidence rates for other reported fracture types were significantly lower for ABL/ALN vs PBO/ALN (all P < 0.05). Gains in BMD achieved during ACTIVE were further increased during ACTIVExtend. For ACTIVExtend only, RRR for vertebral fractures was 87% with ABL/ALN vs PBO/ALN (P = 0.001). Adverse events were similar between groups. A supplemental analysis for regulatory authorities found no hip fractures in the ABL/ALN group vs five in the PBO/ALN group.

CONCLUSIONS

Eighteen months of ABL followed by 24 months of ALN reduced the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, clinical, and major osteoporotic fractures and increased BMD. Sequential ABL followed by ALN appears to be an effective treatment option for postmenopausal women at risk for osteoporosis-related fractures.

Effects of denosumab treatment on bone mineral density and joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

We aimed to investigate the efficacy of denosumab for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study enrolled 70 RA patients who received denosumab 60 mg subcutaneous injection at baseline and at 6 months. Bone mineral densities (BMD) of the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and hand were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Changes in total modified Sharp score (mTSS), erosion (EN) score, and joint space narrowing score at baseline from 12 months before and at 12 months from baseline. The mean values of BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and hand significantly increased by 7.3, 4.7, 3.9, and 5.4%, respectively, at 12 months. At 12 months from baseline, there were significant decreases in the values of mTSS (1.13 vs. 0.59; p = 0.002) and EN score (0.40 vs. 0.07; p < 0.001), compared with the values at baseline from 12 months before. The existing combined modality therapy with denosumab might be effective for osteoporosis and joint destruction in patients with RA.

Assessment of the effects of switching oral bisphosphonates to denosumab or daily teriparatide in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The aim of this observational, non-randomized study was to clarify the unknown effects of switching oral bisphosphonates (BPs) to denosumab (DMAb) or daily teriparatide (TPTD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The characteristics of the 194 female patients included in the study were 183 postmenopausal, age 65.9 years, lumbar spine (LS) T score -1.8, femoral neck (FN) T score -2.3, dose and rate of taking oral prednisolone (3.6 mg/day) 75.8%, and prior BP treatment duration 40.0 months. The patients were allocated to (1) the BP-continue group (n = 80), (2) the switch-to-DMAb group (n = 74), or (3) the switch-to-TPTD group (n = 40). After 18 months, the increase in bone mineral density (BMD) was significantly greater in the switch-to-DMAb group than in the BP-continue group (LS 5.2 vs 2.3%, P < 0.01; FN 3.8 vs 0.0%, P < 0.01) and in the switch-to-TPTD group than in the BP-continue group (LS 9.0 vs 2.3%, P < 0.001; FN 4.9 vs 0.0%, P < 0.01). Moreover, the switch-to-TPTD group showed a higher LS BMD (P < 0.05) and trabecular bone score (TBS) (2.1 vs -0.7%; P < 0.05) increase than the switch-to-DMAb group. Clinical fracture incidence during this period was 8.8% in the BP-continue group, 4.1% in the switch-to-DMAb group, and 2.5% in the switch-to-TPTD group. Both the switch-to-DMAb group and the switch-to-TPTD group showed significant increases in LS and FN BMD, and the switch-to-TPTD group showed a higher increase in TBS compared to the BP-continue group at 18 months. Switching BPs to DMAb or TPTD in female RA may provide some useful osteoporosis treatment options.

Effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Our work is the first systematic meta-analysis to investigate the effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medication on bone mineral density. Through meta-analyzed 11 studies, our findings suggested that compared with nonusers, use of SSRIs was significantly associated with lumbar spine BMD reduction, particularly for old people. The use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has already been associated with bone mass loss. Their effects on bone mineral density (BMD) for the different bone sections have, however, thus been inconsistent. Here, we aim to assess the effects of SSRIs on BMD using a meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO for all English-written studies investigating the effects of SSRIs on BMD and published before November 2017. BMD was compared between non-SSRI users and SSRI users using a random-effect model with standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Furthermore, subgroup analyses were performed based on study design, age, and sex in order to find the origins of high heterogeneity. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria and were used for the meta-analysis. Our study demonstrated that the use of SSRIs was significantly associated with lower BMD values (SMD - 0.40; 95% CI - 0.79 to 0.00; p = 0.05) and BMD Z-scores (SMD - 0.28; 95% CI - 0.50 to - 0.05; p = 0.02) of the lumbar spine, but not of the total hip and femoral neck. In addition, SSRI use was associated with a greater bone loss in older people. SSRI use is a risk factor of lower BMD of the lumbar spine, especially for older people. Future studies into the relationship between SSRI use and bone metabolism and bone mass need to be conducted with larger sample sizes for both men and women at different bone sites.

The positive association of total protein intake with femoral neck strength (KNHANES IV)

Data gathered from a nationally representative cohort demonstrate that higher dietary protein intake was positively associated with the composite indices of femoral neck strength in both men and women, suggesting that higher protein intake may contribute to lower risk of hip fracture through the improvement of bone strength.

INTRODUCTION

Despite the general belief that higher protein intake may be helpful for bone homeostasis, its impact on human bone health is still debated. Furthermore, the association of dietary protein intake with femoral neck (FN) strength, which can predict fracture risk independently of bone mineral density (BMD), has not been thoroughly studied.

METHODS

This is a population-based, cross-sectional study from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, including 592 men aged 50 years or older and 590 postmenopausal women. The composite indices of FN strength, such as the compression strength index (CSI), bending strength index (BSI), and impact strength index (ISI), were generated by combining BMD, body weight, and height with the femoral axis length and width, which were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

After adjustment for confounders, total protein intake (g/kg/day) positively correlated with all three FN composite indices in both genders (P = 0.006 to 0.035), except for BSI showing marginal significance in postmenopausal women (P = 0.093). Consistently, compared with subjects in lowest total protein intake quartile, those in the highest quartile showed markedly higher CSI, BSI, and ISI values (P = 0.043 to < 0.001), with a dose-response manner across increasing total protein intake quartile categories in both men and women (P for trend = 0.028 to < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide the clinical evidence that higher dietary protein intake can play a beneficial role on bone health through the increase of FN strength relative to load in adults.

Combined hormonal contraceptives use and bone mineral density changes in adolescent and young women in a prospective population-based Canada-wide observational study

OBJECTIVES

To assess combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) use and adolescent women's peak areal bone mineral density (BMD) accrual.

METHODS

We enrolled 527 randomly selected women across Canada (2004-6) divided by age into adolescents (16-19) and young adults (20-24) and by CHC use to ever (E-CHC)/never (N-CHC) users. At baseline and year 2 we measured height, weight, and BMD at lumbar spine (L1-4), femoral neck, and total hip sites. Interviewer-administered questionnaires addressed menarche age, cigarette and alcohol use, calcium/vitamin D intakes, physical activity and estrogen dose (≤30/>30 micrograms). Linear regression models examined associations of CHC use with 2-year BMD change adjusted for bone-related variables.

RESULTS

Of 307 women with complete data, 229 (75%) used CHC. N-CHC adolescents gained significantly more unadjusted total hip BMD +0.012 g/cm2/2-y (95% C.I.: 0.001, 0.023) with similar trends at all sites. N-CHC adolescents tended to have greater adjusted femoral neck BMD gain: mean difference +0.009 g/cm2 (95% CI: -0.002; 0.021). In young women N-CHC, however, adjusted femoral neck BMD decreased significantly more -0.021 g/cm2 (95%CI: -0.006; -0.036) with similar trends at other sites. BMD changes were unrelated to estrogen dose and age at starting CHC.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescent CHC users in a random population demonstrated less hip region peak BMD accrual than non-users. This requires randomized control trial confirmation.

Exposure to tobacco smoke increases bone loss in spontaneously hypertensive rats

PURPOSE

To define if exposure to tobacco smoke (TS) could induce reduction of bone mass and impairment of bone architecture, features observed in osteoporosis in normotensive rats and the influence of TS exposure on the osteoporotic features exhibited in the spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats.

METHODS

Normotensive Wistar Kyoto (WKY) and SH rats were exposed to filtered air or TS for 8 weeks, then their proximal femurs were extracted for micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) assessment, histological and immune-histological examinations to quantify the adverse influence of TS exposure on the bone mass and density, as well as bone architecture.

RESULTS

We found that TS exposure not only induced significant decreases in bone mineral density (BMD), bone volume (BV), cortical and trabecular thickness (Ct.Th and Tb.Th), trabecular surface area (Tb.Ar), expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) in the trabecular marrow, delayed ossification of cartilage, as well as statistical increases in trabecular separation (Tb.SP) and the number of trabecular marrow adipocytes in both WKY and SH rats, but also exacerbated multiple features of osteoporosis exhibited in SH rats, including decreased BMD, Ct.Th, Tb.Ar, HIF-1α expression, delayed cartilage ossification, and increased Tb.SP.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that TS exposure can reduce bone mass and impair bone architecture and exacerbate multiple features of osteoporosis exhibited in SH rats.

Tocilizumab potentially prevents bone loss in patients with anticitrullinated protein antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with a high risk of osteoporosis and fracture. Interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitors may suppress osteoclast activation. Anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) titers are inversely associated with bone mineral density (BMD). However, the differential effect of ACPA on bone turnover marker (BTM) and BMD changes after IL-6 inhibition remains unclear. This prospective study recruited patients with active RA with inadequate response to methotrexate or biologics. BMD was measured before and after 2-year tocilizumab (TCZ) treatment. Serum osteocalcin, N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (P1NP), and C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) levels were assessed at the baseline and after treatment. We enrolled 76 patients with RA (89.5% women, age: 57.2 ± 13.3 years) receiving TCZ. The 28-joint disease activity score was negatively correlated with BMD and T-scores of the lumbar spine and bilateral femoral neck. ACPA-positive patients had lower lumbar spine and femoral neck T-scores. After 2-year TCZ treatment, CTX levels significantly decreased (0.32 ± 0.21 vs. 0.26 ± 0.17, p = 0.038). Femoral neck BMD increased significantly (0.71 ± 0.22 vs. 0.69 ± 0.55, p = 0.008). Decreased CTX levels and improved BMD were observed only in ACPA-positive patients. After treatment, femoral neck BMD significantly increased only in patients receiving a glucocorticoid dose of ≥5 mg/day. Two-year TCZ treatment reduced bone resorption and increased femoral BMD in ACPA-positive patients. The net effects of glucocorticoids and IL-6 inhibition on BMD imply that strict inflammation control might affect bone metabolism.

Impact of pioglitazone on bone mineral density and bone marrow fat content

Pioglitazone use is associated with an increased risk of fractures. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study, pioglitazone use for 12 months was associated with a significant increase in bone marrow fat content at the femoral neck, accompanied by a significant decrease in total hip bone mineral density. The change in bone marrow fat with pioglitazone use was predominantly observed in female vs. male participants.

INTRODUCTION

Use of the insulin sensitizer pioglitazone is associated with greater fracture incidence, although the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. This study aimed to assess the effect of pioglitazone treatment on femoral neck bone marrow (BM) fat content and on bone mineral density (BMD), and to establish if any correlation exists between the changes in these parameters.

METHODS

In this double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, 42 obese volunteers with metabolic syndrome were randomized to pioglitazone (45 mg/day) or matching placebo for 1 year. The following measurements were conducted at baseline and during the treatment: liver, pancreas, and femoral neck BM fat content (by magnetic resonance spectroscopy), BMD by DXA, abdominal subcutaneous and visceral fat, and beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity.

RESULTS

Results were available for 37 subjects who completed the baseline and 1-year evaluations. At 12 months, BM fat increased with pioglitazone (absolute change, +4.1%, p = 0.03), whereas BM fat content in the placebo group decreased non-significantly (-3.1%, p = 0.08) (p = 0.007 for the pioglitazone-placebo response difference). Total hip BMD declined in the pioglitazone group (-1.4%) and increased by 0.8% in the placebo group (p = 0.03 between groups). The change in total hip BMD was inversely and significantly correlated with the change in BM fat content (Spearman rho = -0.56, p = 0.01) in the pioglitazone group, but not within the placebo group (rho = -0.29, p = 0.24). Changes in BM fat with pioglitazone were predominantly observed in female vs. male subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Pioglitazone use for 12 months compared with placebo is associated with significant increase in BM fat content at the femoral neck, accompanied by a small but significant decrease in total hip BMD.

Long-term effect of aromatase inhibitors on bone microarchitecture and macroarchitecture in non-osteoporotic postmenopausal women with breast cancer

In non-osteoporotic postmenopausal women with breast cancer, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) negatively affected bone mineral density (BMD), lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS) as a bone microarchitecture index, and hip geometry as a bone macroarchitecture index.

INTRODUCTION

AIs increase the risk of fracture in patients with breast cancer. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the long-term skeletal effects of AIs in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective longitudinal observational study in non-osteoporotic patients with breast cancer who were treated with AIs for ≥3 years (T-score >-2.5). Patients with previous anti-osteoporosis treatment or those who were given bisphosphonate during AI treatment were excluded from the analysis. We serially assessed BMD, lumbar spine TBS, and hip geometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

BMD significantly decreased from baseline to 5 years at the lumbar spine (-6.15%), femur neck (-7.12%), and total hip (-6.35%). Lumbar spine TBS also significantly decreased from baseline to 5 years (-2.12%); this change remained significant after adjusting for lumbar spine BMD. The annual loss of lumbar spine BMD and TBS slowed after 3 and 1 year of treatment, respectively, although there was a relatively constant loss of BMD at the femur neck and total hip for up to 4 years. The cross-sectional area, cross-sectional moment of inertia, minimal neck width, femur strength index, and section modulus significantly decreased, although the buckling ratio increased over the treatment period (all P < 0.001); these changes were independent of total hip BMD.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term adjuvant AI treatment negatively influenced bone quality in addition to BMD in patients with breast cancer. This study suggests that early monitoring and management are needed in non-osteoporotic patients with breast cancer who are starting AIs.

Updated association of tea consumption and bone mineral density: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current studies evaluating the association of tea consumption and bone mineral density (BMD) have yielded inconsistent findings. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between tea consumption and BMD.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched, and a meta-analysis performed of all observational studies assessing the association of tea consumption and BMD. Forest plots were used to illustrate the results graphically. The Q-test and I statistic were employed to evaluate between-study heterogeneity. Potential publication bias was assessed by the funnel plot.

RESULTS

Four cohort, 1 case-control, and 8 cross-sectional studies including a total of 12,635 cases were included. Tea consumption was shown to prevent bone loss [odds ratio (OR): 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47-0.94; P = 0.02], yielding higher mineral densities in several bones, including the lumbar spine [standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.19; 95% CI, 0.08-0.31; P = 0.001], hip (SMD: 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.34; P = 0.01), femoral neck [mean difference (MD): 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.02; P = 0.04], Ward triangle (MD: 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.04; P = 0.001), and greater trochanter (MD: 0.03; 95% CI, 0.02-0.04; P < 0.00001), than the non-tea consumption group.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provided a potential trend that tea consumption might be beneficial for BMD, especially in the lumbar spine, hip, femoral neck, Ward triangle, and greater trochanter, which might help prevent bone loss.

Exploratory analysis of the potential relationship between urinary molybdenum and bone mineral density among adult men and women from NHANES 2007-2010

Human exposure to molybdenum (Mo) may play a role in reducing bone mineral density (BMD) by interfering with steroid sex hormone levels. To begin to address gaps in the literature on this topic, the potential relationship between urinary Mo (U-Mo) and BMD at the femoral neck (FN-BMD) and lumbar spine (LS-BMD) was explored in a sample of 1496 adults participating in the 2007-2010 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Associations were assessed using multiple linear regression models stratified on sex and age. In adjusted models for 50-80+ year-old women, there was a statistically significant inverse relationship between natural log-U-Mo and LS-BMD (p-value: 0.002), and a statistically significant dose-dependent decrease in LS-BMD with increasing U-Mo quartiles (trend p-value: 0.002). A suggestive (trend p-value: 0.08), dose-dependent decrease in FN-BMD with increasing U-Mo quartiles was noted in this group of women as well. All other adjusted models revealed no statistically significant or suggestive relationships between U-Mo and FN-BMD or LS-BMD. Bone health is important for overall human health and well-being and, given the exploratory nature of this work, additional studies are needed to confirm the results in other populations, and clarify the potential underlying mechanisms of Mo on BMD.

The Benefit of Menopausal Hormone Therapy on Bone Density and Microarchitecture Persists After its Withdrawal

CONTEXT

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) favorably affects bone mineral density (BMD). Whether MHT also affects bone microarchitecture, as assessed by trabecular bone score (TBS), has never been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess the effect of MHT on TBS and BMD before and after its withdrawal.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study.

SETTING

This study included the general community.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Data were collected from the OsteoLaus cohort (1500 women aged 50-80 years). After exclusion of women with bone-modulating treatments, 1279 women were categorized according to MHT status into current (CU), past (PU), and never (NU) users.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Spine TBS and BMD at lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip were assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

Age- and body mass index-adjusted analysis showed higher TBS values in CU vs PU or NU (1.31 ± 0.01, 1.29 ± 0.01, and 1.27 ± 0.01, respectively; P < .001). All BMD values were significantly higher in CU vs PU or NU. Compared to NU, PU exhibited higher lumbar spine (0.94 ± 0.01 vs 0.91 ± 0.01 g/cm²; P = .017) and total hip (0.86 ± 0.01 vs 0.84 ± 0.01 g/cm²; P = .026) BMD and a trend for higher TBS (P = .066). The 10-year loss of TBS and BMD at lumbar spine and total hip was significantly lower for both CU and PU vs NU. MHT duration had no effect on bone parameters. In PU, the residual effect on TBS and BMD was significantly more prominent in early discontinuers (<2 years).

CONCLUSION

MHT is associated with bone microarchitecture preservation, as assessed by TBS. The effect of MHT on TBS and BMD persists at least 2 years after withdrawal.

Evaluation of Quantitative Computed Tomography Cortical Hip Quadrant in a Clinical Trial With Rosiglitazone: A Potential New Study Endpoint

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements have been used extensively to ascertain information about bone quality and density due to the 3-dimensional information provided and the ability to segment out trabecular and cortical bones. QCT imaging helps to improve our understanding of the role that each bone compartment plays in the pathogenesis and prognosis of fracture. This study was conducted to explore longitudinal changes in femoral neck (FN) cortical bone structure using both volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and cortical shell thickness assessments via QCT in a double-blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study also examined whether treatment-associated changes in the cortical bone vBMD and thickness in femoral neck quadrants could be evaluated. Subjects were randomized to rosiglitazone (RSG) or metformin (MET) for 52 wk followed by 24 wk of open-label MET. A subset of 87 subjects underwent QCT scans of the hip at baseline, after 52 wk of double-blind treatment, and after 24 wk of treatment with MET using standard full-body computed tomography scanners. All scans were evaluated and analyzed centrally. Cortical vBMD at the FN was precisely segmented from trabecular bone and used to assess a possible therapeutic effect on this bone compartment. QCT analysis showed reductions in adjusted mean percentage change in vBMD and in absolute cortical thickness occurred with RSG treatment from baseline to week 52, whereas changes with MET were generally minimal. The reductions observed during RSG treatment for 1 yr appeared to partially reverse during the open-label MET phase from weeks 52 to 76. The femoral neck quadrant may provide utility as a potential endpoint in clinical trials for the understanding of the therapeutic effect of new entities on cortical bone vs trabecular bone; however, further clinical validation is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol (GSK study number AVD111179) was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00679939.

Prophylactic pamidronate partially protects from glucocorticoid-induced bone loss in the mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Glucocorticoids are extensively used to treat patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy because of their ability to delay muscle damage, prolong ambulation and extend life. However, use of glucocorticoids significantly increases bone loss, fragility and fractures. To determine if antiresorptive bisphosphonates could prevent the effects of glucocorticoids on bone quality, we used dystrophic mdx mice treated with the glucocorticoid prednisone during 8weeks of rapid bone growth from 5 to 13weeks of age and treated some mice with the bisphosphonate pamidronate during the first two weeks of prednisone administration. Prednisone reduced long bone growth, decreased cortical bone thickness and area and decreased the strength of the femurs. Pamidronate treatment protected mice from cortical bone loss but did not increase bone strength. The combination of prednisone and pamidronate inhibited remodeling of metaphyseal trabecular bone with large numbers of trabeculae containing remnants of calcified cartilage. Prednisone improved muscle strength in the mdx mice and decreased serum creatine kinase with evidence of improved muscle histology and these effects were maintained in mice treated with pamidronate.

Effects of antidepressants on postmenopausal bone loss - A 5-year longitudinal study from the OSTPRE cohort

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis and depression are major health problems worldwide. The association between antidepressants, a treatment for depression, and bone health needs more detailed exploration.

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigates antidepressant medication use and postmenopausal bone loss over time.

METHODS

A total of 1988 women (aged 57-67) participating in the Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study (OSTPRE) cohort responded to a postal enquiry and had their femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) measured in 1999 and again in 2004. Data on antidepressant use was obtained from the National Prescription Register. Multiple regression techniques were used to test the associations, before and after adjustment for anthropometric, medical, physical and lifestyle factors.

RESULTS

Over the five years of follow-up, 319 (16.0%) women purchased antidepressants. Mean baseline femoral neck BMD for the entire study group was 881mg/cm(2) (SD 123) and mean 5-year bone loss was 6.0mg/cm(2) (SD 4.7). After adjustments, users of tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) had greater annual BMD loss than non-users (-3.6mg/cm(2) vs. -1.1mg/cm(2); P=0.031). Accelerated bone loss was also associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor's (SSRI) use (P=0.001) and use of other antidepressants in a dose-response way, with the latter only among women of low-weight and normal-weight women who had lost weight over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the use of SSRIs seems to accelerate postmenopausal bone loss in a dose-response manner. Associations between TCA and other antidepressant use and bone loss may also exist. Thus, the possibility of increased risk of osteoporosis should be considered when prescribing antidepressants for postmenopausal women.

Long-term glucocorticoid effect on bone mineral density in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency

INTRODUCTION

Patients with 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21OHD) assume a lifelong glucocorticoid (GC) therapy. Excessive GC treatment increases the risk of osteoporosis and bone fractures, even though the role of substitutive therapy is not fully established: we analyzed the effect of GC dose on bone metabolism and bone mineral density (BMD) over time in patients with 21OHD.

METHODS

We studied bone metabolism markers and BMD in 38 adult patients with 21OHD (19-47 years, 24 females and 14 males) and 38 matched healthy control. In 15 patients, BMD data were available at both baseline and after a long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

BMD was lower in patients than in controls at lumbar spine (0.961±0.1g/cm(2) vs 1.02±0.113g/cm(2), P=0.014) and femur neck (0.736±0.128g/cm(2) vs 0.828±0.103g/cm(2), P=0.02); otherwise, after height correction, only femoral neck BMD was lower in patients (0.458±0.081g/cm(2) vs 0.498±0.063g/cm(2), P=0.028). In those 21OHD subjects with at least 10 years follow-up, we observed an increase in lumbar BMD (P=0.0429) and a decrease in femur neck BMD values (P=0.004). Cumulative GC dose was not related to bone metabolism or BMD. No patient experienced clinical fragility fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

BMD values are decreased in patients with 21OHD, which are in part explained by decreased height, but not by the dose of glucocorticoids. Nevertheless, bone status should be carefully monitored in patients with 21OHD.

Effect of Teriparatide on Bone Formation in the Human Femoral Neck

PURPOSE

Teriparatide (TPTD) improves bone mass and microstructure resulting in reduced risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. However, hip bone mineral density improvements are modest and there are no data confirming that TPTD reduces hip fracture risk. To study the effects of TPTD on the proximal femur, we performed a double-blind trial of TPTD vs placebo (PBO) in patients with osteoarthritis from whom femoral neck (FN) samples were obtained at total hip replacement (THR) surgery.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to receive TPTD or PBO for an average of 40 days before THR. Double tetracycline labeling was initiated 21 days prior to THR to allow histomorphometric assessment of bone formation. During the THR, an intact sample of the FN was procured, fixed, and sectioned transversely. Serum levels of bone turnover markers were measured at baseline and during the THR. Standard histomorphometric parameters were measured and calculated on four bone envelopes (cancellous, endocortical, intracortical, and periosteal). The primary outcome measure was bone formation rate/bone surface (BFR/BS).

RESULTS

Forty individuals were enrolled (25 women, mean age, 71.5 ± 8.0 y and 15 men, mean age, 68.9 ± 7.7 y). In cancellous and endocortical envelopes, BFR/BS was 100% higher in the TPTD vs PBO group (P < .05). Bone turnover markers measured at the time of THR correlated with BFR/BS.

CONCLUSIONS

TPTD stimulates bone formation rapidly in cancellous and endocortical envelopes of the FN. Our findings provide a mechanistic basis for TPTD-mediated improvement in FN bone mass and ultimately hip strength. This study is the first demonstration of the effect of any osteoporosis medication on osteoblast activity in the human proximal femur.

Treatment for osteoporosis in people with ß-thalassaemia

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture. Osteoporosis represents an important cause of morbidity in people with beta-thalassaemia and its pathogenesis is multifactorial. Factors include bone marrow expansion due to ineffective erythropoiesis, resulting in reduced trabecular bone tissue with cortical thinning; endocrine dysfunction secondary to excessive iron loading, leading to increased bone turnover; and lastly, a predisposition to physical inactivity due to disease complications with a subsequent reduction in optimal bone mineralization.A number of therapeutic strategies have been applied to treat osteoporosis in people with beta-thalassaemia, which include bisphosphonates, with or without, hormone replacement therapy. There are various forms of bisphosphonates, such as clodronate, pamidronate, alendronate and zoledronic acid. Other treatments include calcitonin, calcium, zinc supplementation, hydroxyurea and hormone replacement therapy for preventing hypogonadism.

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence on the efficacy and safety of treatment for osteoporosis in people with beta-thalassaemia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.Date of most recent search: 04 February 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, placebo-controlled trials in people with thalassaemia with a bone mineral density z score of less than -2 standard deviations for: children less than 15 years old; adult males (15 to 50 years old); and all pre-menopausal females above 15 years and a bone mineral density t score of less than -2.5 standard deviations for post-menopausal females and males above 50 years old.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed the eligibility and risk of bias of the included trials, extracted and analysed data and completed the review. We summarised results using risk ratios or rate ratios for dichotomous data and mean differences for continuous data. We combined trial results where appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials (with 211 participants) were included; three trials investigated the effect of bisphosphonate therapies and one trial investigated the effect of zinc supplementation. Only one trial was judged to be of good quality (low risk of bias); the remaining trials had a high or unclear risk of bias in at least one key domain.One trial (data not available for analysis) assessing the effect of neridronate (118 participants) reported significant increases in favour of the bisphosphonate group for bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and hip at both six and 12 months. For the femoral neck, a significant difference was noted at 12 months only. A further trial (25 participants) assessed the effect of alendronate and clodronate and found that after two years, bone mineral density increased significantly in the alendronate and clodronate groups as compared to placebo at the lumbar spine, mean difference 0.14 g/cm(2) (95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.22) and at the femoral neck, mean difference 0.40 g/cm(2) (95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.57). One 12-month trial (26 participants) assessed the effects of different doses of pamidronate (30 mg versus 60 mg) and found a significant difference in bone mineral density in favour of the 60 mg dose at the lumbar spine and forearm, mean difference 0.43 g/cm(2) (95% CI 0.10 to 0.76), mean difference 0.87 g/cm(2) (95% CI 0.23 to 1.51), respectively, but not at the femoral neck.In a zinc sulphate supplementation trial (42 participants), bone mineral density increased significantly compared to placebo at the lumbar spine after 12 months (37 participants), mean difference 0.15 g/cm(2) (95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.20) and after 18 months (32 participants), mean difference 0.34 g/cm(2) (95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.40). The same was true for bone mineral density at the hip after 12 months, mean difference 0.15 g/cm(2) (95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.19) and after 18 months, mean difference 0.26 g/cm(2) (95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.31).Fractures were not observed in one trial and not reported in three trials. There were no major adverse effects reported in two of the bisphosphonate trials; in the neridronate trial there was a reduction noted in the use of analgesic drugs and in the reported back pain score in favour of bisphosphonate treatment. Adverse effects were not reported in the trial of different doses of pamidronate or the zinc supplementation trial.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence to indicate an increase in bone mineral density at the femoral neck, lumbar spine and forearm after administration of bisphosphonates and at the lumbar spine and hip after zinc sulphate supplementation. The authors recommend that further long-term randomised control trials on different bisphosphonates and zinc supplementation therapies in people with beta-thalassaemia and osteoporosis are undertaken.

Bone mineral density changes among women initiating blood pressure lowering drugs: a SWAN cohort study

SUMMARY

We examined the effect of blood pressure lowering drugs on BMD using data from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. Thiazide users had a slower decline in BMD compared to nonusers, while decline among ACE inhibitor and beta blocker users were similar to rates in nonusers.

INTRODUCTION

Several blood pressure lowering drugs may affect bone mineral density (BMD), leading to altered fracture risk. We examined the effect of blood pressure lowering drugs on BMD using data from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

METHODS

We conducted a propensity score matched cohort study. Women were initiators of ACE inhibitors (ACEi), beta-blockers (BB), or thiazide diuretics (THZD). Their annualized BMD changes during the 14 years of observation were compared with nonusers.

RESULTS

Among the 2312 eligible women, we found 69 ACEi, 71 BB, and 74 THZD users who were matched by a propensity score with the same number of nonusers. THZD users had a slower annual percent decline in BMD compared to nonusers at the femoral neck (FN) (-0.28% vs -0.88%; p = 0.008) and the spine (-0.74% vs -1.0%; p = 0.34), albeit not statistically significant. Annual percent changes in BMD among ACEi and BB users were similar to rates in nonusers. In comparison with BB, THZD use was associated with a trend toward less annualized BMD loss at the spine (-0.35% vs -0.60%; p = 0.08) and a similar trend at the FN (-0.39% vs -0.64%; p = 0.08); in comparisons with ACEi, THZD was also associated with less loss at the FN (-0.48% vs -0.82%; p = 0.02), but not at the spine (-0.40% vs -0.56%; p = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither ACEi nor BB was associated with improvements in BMD. THZD use was associated with less annualized loss of BMD compared with nonusers, as well as compared with ACEi and BB.

Denosumab increases sublesional bone mass in osteoporotic individuals with recent spinal cord injury

Osteoporosis is a frequent complication related to spinal cord injury (SCI), and data on osteoporosis treatment after SCI is scarce. Treatment with denosumab increases lumbar and femoral BMD and decreases bone turnover markers in individuals with recent SCI. This drug may be a promising therapeutic option in SCI-related osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis development is a frequent complication related to SCI, especially at the sublesional level. Nevertheless, data on osteoporosis treatment after SCI is scarce, particularly short term after injury, when the highest bone loss is produced. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of denosumab in the treatment of SCI-related osteoporosis.

METHODS

Fourteen individuals aged 39 ± 15 years with osteoporosis secondary to recent SCI (mean injury duration 15 ± 4 months) were treated with denosumab for 12 months. Bone turnover markers (BTMs) (PINP, bone ALP, sCTx), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels and bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), and femoral neck (FN) were assessed at baseline and at 12 months. All participants received calcium and vitamin D supplementation.

RESULTS

At 12 months, SCI denosumab-treated participants showed a significant increase in BMD at TH (+2.4 ± 3.6 %, p = 0.042), FN (+3 ± 3.6 %, p = 0.006), and LS (+7.8 ± 3.7 %, p < 0.001) compared to baseline values. Denosumab treatment was associated with significant decreases in BTMs (bone ALP -42 %, p < 0.001; PINP -58 %, p < 0.001, sCTx -57 %, p = 0.002) at 12 months. BMD evolution was not related to BTM changes or 25OHD serum levels. No skeletal fractures or serious adverse events were observed during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with denosumab increases lumbar and femoral BMD and decreases bone turnover markers in individuals with recent SCI. This drug may be a promising therapeutic option in SCI-related osteoporosis.

Negative Impact of Aromatase Inhibitors on Proximal Femoral Bone Mass and Geometry in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the standard therapy for estrogen receptor- or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women, lead to increased hip fractures in breast cancer patients. To investigate the mechanism of increased incidence of hip fractures in breast cancer patients treated with AIs, we evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) in the cortical and trabecular compartments and assessed femoral geometry using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in breast cancer patients. In total, 249 early breast cancer patients who underwent QCT in their fifties (mean age 54.3 years) were retrospectively analyzed. Proximal femoral BMD and geometrical parameters were compared. In all regions of the proximal femur, cortical areal BMDs were lower in the AI group than in the non-AI group (p < 0.05). Cortical thickness of the femoral neck, trochanter, and total hip was significantly lower in the AI group compared with the non-AI group (p < 0.05). Analysis of the narrowest section of the femoral neck showed significantly thinner cortical bone and smaller cortical area in the AI group than in the non-AI group (p < 0.05), especially in the superoposterior quadrant. Bone strength parameters in the femoral neck, such as the section modulus and cross-sectional moment of inertia, were significantly lower in the AI group than in the non-AI group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, AI treatment in breast cancer patients is associated with deterioration of femoral cortical BMD and geometry, which could contribute in site-specific weakened bone strength and increased incidence of hip fractures.

Effects of pioglitazone and fenofibrate co-administration on bone biomechanics and histomorphometry in ovariectomized rats

Pioglitazone, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ) agonist is an effective therapy for type 2 diabetes, but has been associated with increased risk for bone fracture. Preclinical studies suggest that PPAR-α agonists (e.g., fenofibrate) increase bone mineral density/content, although clinical data on bone effects of fibrates are lacking. We investigated the effects of pioglitazone (10 mg/kg/day) and fenofibrate (25 mg/kg/day) on bone strength and bone histomorphometric parameters in osteopenic ovariectomized (OVX) rats. An additional group of rats received a combination of pioglitazone + fenofibrate to mimic the effects of a dual PPAR-α/γ agonist. The study consisted of a 13-week treatment phase followed by a 6-week treatment-free recovery period. Pioglitazone significantly reduced biomechanical strength at the lumbar spine and femoral neck compared with rats administered fenofibrate. Co-treatment with pioglitazone + fenofibrate had no significant effect on bone strength in comparison with OVX vehicle controls. Histomorphometric analysis of the proximal tibia revealed that pioglitazone suppressed bone formation and increased bone resorption at both cancellous and cortical bone sites relative to OVX vehicle controls. In contrast, fenofibrate did not affect bone resorption and only slightly suppressed bone formation. Discontinuation of pioglitazone treatment, both in the monotherapy and in the combination therapy arms, resulted in restoration of bone formation and resorption rates, demonstrating reversibility of effects. The above data support the concept that dual activation of PPAR-γ and PPAR-α attenuates the negative effects of PPAR-γ agonism on bone strength.

Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and bone mass in adolescents: An NHANES study

CONTEXT

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are commonly prescribed medications to treat depression and anxiety. SSRIs exert their effects by inhibiting the serotonin transporter and modulating extracellular serotonin levels, a neurotransmitter that has been shown to affect bone metabolism in animals. Studies in adults suggest a negative association between SSRI use and bone mineral density (BMD), greater rates of bone loss with SSRI use and increased risk of fractures. However, the results on bone mass have been inconsistent. Furthermore, there is a dearth of studies examining an association between SSRI use and bone mass in the pediatric and adolescent age group.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate associations between SSRI use and bone mass in adolescents.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2005-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES).

PARTICIPANTS

4303 NHANES participants aged 12-20 years. The mean age was 15.65±2.42 years.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Total femur, femoral neck and lumbar spine bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD assessed via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

RESULTS

62 out of 4303 subjects used SSRIs. SSRI use was an independent predictor of bone mass after adjusting for age, gender, height and weight Z score, socioeconomic status, physical activity, serum cotinine level and race/ethnicity. After multivariable adjustment, total femur BMC was 8.8% lower among SSRI users versus non-users (mean difference 2.98 g, SE±0.105 g, p=0.0006), while total femur BMD was 6.1% lower (mean difference 0.06 g/cm2, SE±0.002 g/cm2, p=0.016). Femoral neck BMC and BMD and lumbar spine BMC were similarly negatively associated with SSRI use. Compared to nonusers, lumbar spine BMC was 7% lower among SSRI users (mean difference 0.97 g, SE±0.048g, p=0.02) and BMD was 3.2% lower (mean difference 0.03 g/cm2, SE±0.015 g/cm2, p=0.09). Sub-analysis of those individuals treated for more than 6 months yield similar results. Finally, the association of SSRIs with bone mass persisted after excluding individuals with Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 5th percentile thus accounting for the possible confounding effect of anorexia nervosa, which can be treated with SSRIs.

CONCLUSION

In this NHANES study, adolescents treated with SSRIs had lower DXA measurements of the total femur and lumbar spine compared to SSRI non-users. These findings support the need for future prospective studies to examine the effects of SSRI use on bone mass in adolescents.

Efficacy and safety of odanacatib treatment for patients with osteoporosis: a meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of odanacatib (ODN) for the treatment of osteoporosis, using data in studies reported in the literature. We performed a literature search to compare the outcomes of applications of once-weekly ODN 50 mg and control. The outcomes of osteoporosis evaluated include primary outcome as bone mineral density (BMD) at different skeletal sites, and secondary outcomes, including adverse events (AEs), such as incidence of skin AEs, fracture, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Four trials were included. Mean difference (95% CI) of lumbar spine BMD was 3.41 (1.57-5.24) at 12 months and 4.89 (2.72-7.05) at 24 months; mean difference (95% CI) of femoral neck BMD was 1.90 (0.73-3.08) at 12 months and 3.85 (2.55-5.15) at 24 months; mean difference (95% CI) of total hip BMD was 2.65 (1.20-4.09) at 12 months and 3.70 (1.76-5.64) at 24 months; risk ratio (95% CI) of AEs was 0.98 (0.91-1.07); risk ratio (95% CI) of SAEs was 1.11 (0.72-1.72); risk ratio (95% CI) of skin AEs was 0.92 (0.63-1.35); and risk ratio (95% CI) of fracture was 0.34 (0.16-0.70). In this study, application of 50 mg ODN produced significantly greater BMD increases and lower fracture incidence than that of the control. In addition, ODN was generally well tolerated.

A 24-month study evaluating the efficacy and safety of denosumab for the treatment of men with low bone mineral density: results from the ADAMO trial

CONTEXT

One in 4 men in the United States aged >50 years will have an osteoporosis-related fracture. Fewer data are available on osteoporosis treatment in men than in women.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate denosumab therapy in men with low bone mineral density (BMD).

DESIGN

This was a phase 3 study with 2 treatment periods: a previously reported 12-month double-blind, placebo-controlled phase and a 12-month open-label phase.

SETTING

This was a multicenter study conducted in North America and Europe.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 228 men entered the open-label phase and 219 completed the study.

INTERVENTION

Men from the original denosumab (long-term) and placebo (crossover) groups received 60 mg of denosumab sc every 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

BMD, serum collagen type I C-telopeptide, and safety were measured.

RESULTS

During the open-label phase, continued BMD increases occurred with long-term denosumab treatment (2.2% lumbar spine, 0.9% total hip, 1.3% femoral neck, 1.3% trochanter, and 0.2% 1/3 radius), resulting in cumulative 24-month gains from baseline of 8.0%, 3.4%, 3.4%, 4.6%, and 0.7%, respectively (all P < .01). The crossover group showed BMD gains after 12 months of denosumab treatment similar to those of the long-term denosumab group during the first treatment year. Significant reductions in serum collagen type I C-teleopeptide were observed after denosumab administration. Adverse event rates were similar between groups, and no new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

In men with low BMD, denosumab treatment for a second year continued to increase BMD, maintained reductions in bone resorption, and was well tolerated. BMD increased in men initiating denosumab during the second year. These effects were similar to those previously seen in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and in men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy.

Cortical bone mineral density in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency

BACKGROUND

Prior studies reveal that bone mineral density (BMD) in congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is mostly in the osteopaenic range and is associated with lifetime glucocorticoid dose. The forearm, a measure of cortical bone density, has not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate BMD at various sites, including the forearm, and the factors associated with low BMD in CAH patients.

METHODS

Eighty CAH adults (47 classic, 33 nonclassic) underwent dual-energy-x-ray absorptiometry and laboratory and clinical evaluation. BMD Z-scores at the AP spine, total hip, femoral neck, forearm and whole body were examined in relation to phenotype, body mass index, current glucocorticoid dose, average 5-year glucocorticoid dose, vitamin D, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, androstenedione, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS).

RESULTS

Reduced BMD (T-score <-1 at hip, spine, or forearm) was present in 52% and was more common in classic than nonclassic patients (P = 0·005), with the greatest difference observed at the forearm (P = 0·01). Patients with classic compared to nonclassic CAH, had higher 17-hydroxyprogesterone (P = 0·005), lower DHEAS (P = 0·0002) and higher non-traumatic fracture rate (P = 0·0005). In a multivariate analysis after adjusting for age, gender, height standard deviation, phenotype and cumulative glucocorticoid exposure, higher DHEAS was independently associated with higher BMD at the spine, radius and whole body.

CONCLUSION

Classic CAH patients have lower BMD than nonclassic patients, with the most affected area being the forearm. This first study of forearm BMD in CAH patients suggests that low DHEAS may be associated with weak cortical bone independent of glucocorticoid exposure.