Immune-stealth VP28-conjugated heparin nanoparticles for enhanced and reversible anticoagulation

Heparins are a family of sulfated linear negatively charged polysaccharides that have been widely used for their anticoagulant, antithrombotic, antitumor, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral properties. Additionally, it has been used for acute cerebral infarction relief as well as other pharmacological actions. However, heparin's self-aggregated macrocomplex may reduce blood circulation time and induce life-threatening thrombocytopenia (HIT) complicating the use of heparins. Nonetheless, the conjugation of heparin to immuno-stealth biomolecules may overcome these obstacles. An immunostealth recombinant viral capsid protein (VP28) was expressed and conjugated with heparin to form a novel nanoparticle (VP28-heparin). VP28-heparin was characterized and tested to determine its immunogenicity, anticoagulation properties, effects on total platelet count, and risk of inducing HIT in animal models. The synthesized VP28-heparin trimeric nanoparticle was non-immunogenic, possessed an average hydrodynamic size (8.81 ± 0.58 nm) optimal for the evasion renal filtration and reticuloendothelial system uptake (hence prolonging circulating half-life). Additionally, VP28-heparin did not induce mouse death or reduce blood platelet count when administered at a high dosein vivo(hence reducing HIT risks). The VP28-heparin nanoparticle also exhibited superior anticoagulation properties (2.2× higher prothrombin time) and comparable activated partial thromboplastin time, but longer anticoagulation period when compared to unfractionated heparin. The anticoagulative effects of the VP28-heparin can also be reversed using protamine sulfate. Thus, VP28-heparin may be an effective and safe heparin derivative for therapeutic use.

Delayed-onset eptifibatide-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE

We present a unique case of delayed-onset, profound eptifibatide-induced thrombocytopenia that occurred 5 days after initiation of the drug.

SUMMARY

Eptifibatide is a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor with indications for use in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Eptifibatide-induced thrombocytopenia is uncommon but well studied and typically occurs within 24 hours of initiation of the drug. In the case described here, a 62-year-old male with a past history of coronary artery disease (including percutaneous coronary intervention within the past 12 months) was started on eptifibatide at a dosage of 2 µg/kg per minute for management of significant thrombus burden prior to a planned cardiac revascularization procedure; heparin for anticoagulation was also initiated. About 5 days after initiation of eptifibatide, the patient developed severe thrombocytopenia, with the platelet count dropping precipitously from 249 × 103/µL on admission to less than 1 × 103/µL. After eptifibatide and heparin therapy were discontinued and the patient was switched to argatroban, the platelet count recovered to 38 × 103/µL over the next 2 days. An eptifibatide platelet antibody assay was positive for IgG-mediated reactions consistent with eptifibatide-induced thrombocytopenia. Scoring of this case with the Naranjo scale yielded a score of 4, suggesting a possible adverse reaction to eptifibatide.

CONCLUSION

This is the first published case report of profound eptifibatide-induced thrombocytopenia occurring more than 24 hours after eptifibatide initiation and serves to bring awareness that a delayed reaction can occur.

Drug-drug interaction assessment based on a large-scale spontaneous reporting system for hepato- and renal-toxicity, and thrombocytopenia with concomitant low-dose methotrexate and analgesics use

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment and is highly effective with low-dose intermittent administration. MTX is occasionally used in combination with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen (APAP)/paracetamol for pain or inflammation control. With MTX treatment, the side effects, such as hepatotoxicity, renal failure, and myelosuppression should be considered. These are also seen with analgesics treatment.

METHODS

We used a large spontaneously reported adverse event database (FAERS [JAPIC AERS]) to analyze whether the reporting of adverse events increased upon MTX and analgesic therapy in patients with RA.

RESULTS

After identifying RA cases, the crude reporting odds ratios (cRORs) for hepatotoxicity, renal failure, and thrombocytopenia associated with the use of MTX, APAP, or NSAIDs were calculated by disproportionality analysis, which revealed significantly higher cRORs for these events. No analgesics showed consistent positive signals for drug-drug interaction (DDI) with concomitant low-dose MTX analyzed using four algorithms for DDI interaction (the Ω shrinkage measure, additive or multiplicative, and combination risk ratio models). However, in renal failure and thrombocytopenia, loxoprofen (Ω025 = 0.08) and piroxicam (Ω025 = 0.46), and ibuprofen (Ω025 = 0.74) and ketorolac (Ω025 = 3.52), respectively, showed positive signals in the Ω shrinkage measure model, and no consistency was found among adverse events or NSAIDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies using spontaneous reporting systems have limitations such as reporting bias or lack of patient background; however, the results of our comprehensive analysis support the results of previous clinical or epidemiological studies. This study also demonstrated the usefulness of FAERS for DDI assessment.

Purification and Activity Evaluation of a Novel Thrombopoietin Mimetic Peptide

The emergence of thrombopoietin mimetic peptides presents a promising therapeutic strategy for addressing thrombocytopenia. This particular study aimed to establish a direct, expeditious, and efficient method for modifying and purifying a novel thrombopoietin mimetic peptide. Precursor proteins were subjected to modification utilizing three distinct fatty acids: C25H42O7N2, C39H66O15N4, and C41H70O15N4. Liquid chromatography analyses demonstrated that C41H70O15N4 yielded the most effective modification results. Mass spectrometry findings validated the correspondence between the theoretical and actual molecular weights of each sample. In vivo experiments conducted on normal mice showcased that the C41H70O15N4 modification group exhibited the highest platelet count, peaking at an impressive 5047 × 109/L. This count was approximately twice that of the peak platelet count observed in the dTMP group and four times higher than the control group. Pharmacokinetic investigations revealed that the C41H70O15N4 modification group displayed the lengthiest half-life among beagles, persisting for 128.5 h. This duration was approximately 28.5 times longer than that of the unmodified dTMP group. These findings underscore the effectiveness of the established C41H70O15N4 modification and purification method in preserving the biological activity of the thrombopoietin mimetic peptide. The novel thrombopoietin mimetic peptide showcased notable attributes of simplicity and cost-effectiveness, while also exhibiting a significant platelet-promoting effect and an extended half-life. Consequently, this novel peptide holds substantial significance for advancing the treatment of thrombocytopenia.

Avatrombopag for the Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia and Periprocedural Thrombocytopenia Associated With Chronic Liver Disease

Objective: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, dosing and administration, and place in therapy of avatrombopag for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia and chronic liver disease-associated thrombocytopenia. Summary: Avatrombopag is an orally administered thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia and is the first oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of perioperative thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease in adults. The efficacy and safety of avatrombopag has been demonstrated in a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled phase III study in the setting of immune thrombocytopenia and in 2 identically designed, multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled phase III trials in the setting of thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease. The most common adverse events reported in the clinical trials were headache, fatigue, and gastrointestinal toxicities. The incidence of bleeding events was comparable between the avatrombopag and placebo treatment groups in each study. Avatrombopag has not been shown to be associated with hepatoxicity and does not require food restriction like the other oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist for immune thrombocytopenia, eltrombopag. Also, unlike eltrombopag for immune thrombocytopenia, it can be dosed less frequently than once daily. Conclusion: Avatrombopag offers another safe and effective oral option for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia without food restrictions and an alternative, transfusion-sparing option for thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease patients undergoing surgery.

Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for pneumocystis pneumonia prophylaxis, causes of discontinuation and thrombocytopenia observed during administration: A single-center retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

The development of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) has recently become a growing concern; thus, its prevention has become increasingly important. Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (ST) is a cost-effective first-line and prophylactic treatment for PCP. However, ST administration criteria for PCP prophylaxis remain unclear and are often discontinued because of adverse events (AEs). In this study, we aimed to investigate the causes of ST discontinuation and the associated AEs using objective data.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 162 patients admitted to Kansai Medical University Hospital between January 2018 and December 2020, who received ST for PCP prophylaxis. We compared clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and incidence of AEs between ST non-discontinuation and ST discontinuation groups. Additionally, we divided the patients into non-developing and developing thrombocytopenia (≥ Grade 1) groups based on the investigation results.

RESULTS

No patients developed PCP while receiving ST. The most common causes of ST discontinuation were thrombocytopenia (37%), liver dysfunction (20%), and rash (18%). Multivariate analysis revealed thrombocytopenia (≥ Grade 1) as a factor significantly associated with ST discontinuation. Furthermore, we identified three factors correlated with thrombocytopenia (≥ Grade 1): age ≥50 years, lymphocyte count <1000/μL, and platelet count <180,000/μL.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with the aforementioned factors are at higher risk of developing thrombocytopenia (≥ Grade 1) during ST administration for PCP prophylaxis. Therefore, platelet count monitoring is essential to enhance safety and efficacy of ST treatment. Nonetheless, further research is warranted to explore additional implications and interventions.

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Patients with Thrombocytopenia or with Platelet Dysfunction: The Last 10 Years

Current guideline recommendations for primary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are based on randomized clinical trials that usually exclude subjects at a potentially high risk of bleeding complications. For this reason, no specific guideline is available for thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with thrombocytopenia and/or platelet dysfunction. However, except in patients with absolute contraindications to anticoagulant drugs, antithrombotic prophylaxis should always be considered, for example, in hospitalized cancer patients with thrombocytopenia, especially in those with multiple VTE risk factors. Low platelet number, platelet dysfunction, and clotting abnormalities are also very common in patients with liver cirrhosis, but these patients have a high incidence of portal venous thrombosis, implying that cirrhotic coagulopathy does not fully protect against thrombosis. These patients may benefit from antithrombotic prophylaxis during hospitalization. Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 need prophylaxis, but frequently experience thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy. In patients with antiphospholipid antibodies, a high thrombotic risk is usually present, even in the presence of thrombocytopenia. VTE prophylaxis in high-risk conditions is thus suggested in these patients. At variance with severe thrombocytopenia (< 50,000/mm3), mild/moderate thrombocytopenia (≥ 50,000/mm3) should not interfere with VTE prevention decisions. In patients with severe thrombocytopenia, pharmacological prophylaxis should be considered on an individual basis. Aspirin is not as effective as heparins in lowering the risk of VTE. Studies in patients with ischemic stroke demonstrated that thromboprophylaxis with heparins is safe in these patients also during antiplatelet treatment. The use of direct oral anticoagulants in the prophylaxis of VTE in internal medicine patients has been recently evaluated, but no specific recommendation exists for patients with thrombocytopenia. The need for VTE prophylaxis in patients on chronic treatment with antiplatelet agents should be evaluated after assessing the individual risk of bleeding complications. Finally, the selection of patients who require post-discharge pharmacological prophylaxis remains debated. New molecules currently under development (such as the inhibitors of factor XI) may contribute to improve the risk/benefit ratio of VTE primary prevention in this setting of patients.

Imetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Unmet medical needs remain in patients with red blood cell transfusion-dependent (RBC-TD) lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) who are not responding to or are ineligible for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Imetelstat, a competitive telomerase inhibitor, showed promising results in a phase 2 trial. We aimed to compare the RBC transfusion independence (RBC-TI) rate with imetelstat versus placebo in patients with RBC-TD LR-MDS.

METHODS

In phase 3 of IMerge, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 118 sites including university hospitals, cancer centres, and outpatient clinics in 17 countries, patients (aged ≥18 years) with ESA-relapsed, ESA-refractory, or ESA-ineligible LR-MDS (low or intermediate-1 risk disease as per International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS] criteria) were randomly assigned via a computer-generated schedule (2:1) to receive imetelstat 7·5 mg/kg or placebo, administered as a 2-h intravenous infusion, every 4 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. Randomisation was stratified by previous RBC transfusion burden and IPSS risk group. Patients, investigators, and those analysing the data were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was 8-week RBC-TI, defined as the proportion of patients without RBC transfusions for at least 8 consecutive weeks starting on the day of randomisation until subsequent anti-cancer therapy, if any. Primary efficacy analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population, and safety analyses were conducted in patients who received at least one dose of trial medication or placebo. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02598661; substudy active and recruiting).

FINDINGS

Between Sept 11, 2019, and Oct 13, 2021, 178 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (118 to imetelstat and 60 to placebo). 111 (62%) were male and 67 (38%) were female. 91 (77%) of 118 patients had discontinued treatment by data cutoff in the imetelstat group versus 45 (75%) in the placebo group; a further one patient in the placebo group did not receive treatment. Median follow-up was 19·5 months (IQR 12·0-23·4) in the imetelstat group and 17·5 months (12·1-22·7) in the placebo group. In the imetelstat group, 47 (40% [95% CI 30·9-49·3]) patients had an RBC-TI of at least 8 weeks versus nine (15% [7·1-26·6]) in the placebo group (rate difference 25% [9·9 to 36·9]; p=0·0008). Overall, 107 (91%) of 118 patients receiving imetelstat and 28 (47%) of 59 patients receiving placebo had grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events. The most common treatment-emergent grade 3-4 adverse events in patients taking imetelstat were neutropenia (80 [68%] patients who received imetelstat vs two [3%] who received placebo) and thrombocytopenia (73 [62%] vs five [8%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Imetelstat offers a novel mechanism of action with durable transfusion independence (approximately 1 year) and disease-modifying activity for heavily transfused patients with LR-MDS who are not responding to or are ineligible for ESAs.

FUNDING

Janssen Research & Development before April 18, 2019, and Geron Corporation thereafter.

Sirolimus for the treatment of patients with refractory connective tissue disease-related thrombocytopenia: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

CTD-related immune thrombocytopenia (CTD-ITP) represents an unmet medical need because the drugs that are available are only partly effective and have considerable side-effects. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of sirolimus in refractory CTD-ITP patients.

METHODS

We did a single-arm, open-label, pilot study of sirolimus in patients with CTD-ITP unresponsive to, or intolerant of, conventional medications. Patients received oral sirolimus for 6 months at a starting dose of 0.5-1 mg per day, with dose adjusted according to tolerance and to maintain a therapeutic range of 6-15 ng/ml. The primary efficacy end point was changes in platelet count, and overall response assessed according to the ITP International Working Group Criteria. Safety outcomes included tolerance as assessed by the occurrence of common side-effects.

RESULTS

Between November 2020 and February 2022, 12 consecutively hospitalized patients with refractory CTD-ITP were enrolled and prospectively followed. Of these, six patients (50%) achieved complete response, two (16.7%) achieved partial response, and four (33.3%) were no response under therapy. Three of four patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome and two of three patients with systemic lupus erythematosus achieved overall response. One of two patients with overlapping Sjögren's syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus achieved complete response at 6 months. No severe drug-related toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our results do support sirolimus as an alternative regimen for refractory CTD-ITP patients, including systemic lupus erythematosus and primary SS.

Optimal management of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombopoietin receptor agonists

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common complication of antineoplastic therapy, resulting in antineoplastic therapy dose reductions, treatment delays, treatment discontinuation, and morbid bleeding events. Despite several decades of research into thrombopoietic growth factors in CIT, there are presently no available U.S. FDA- or EMA-approved agents to treat CIT. However, a respectable body of evidence has been published evaluating the thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) for the management and prevention of CIT in patients with solid tumors, and critical studies are ongoing with the TPO-RAs romiplostim and avatrombopag. When employed in the appropriate patient population and used properly, TPO-RAs can successfully and safely manage CIT for extended periods of time with minimal apparent risks. This comprehensive review discusses the evidence for TPO-RAs in CIT in patients with solid tumors, provides detailed guidance for their use in the clinic, and discusses ongoing essential clinical trials in management of CIT.

Management of cancer-associated thromboembolism in vulnerable population

Although all patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) have a high morbidity and mortality risk, certain groups of patients are particularly vulnerable. This may expose the patient to an increased risk of thrombotic recurrence or bleeding (or both), as the benefit-risk ratio of anticoagulant treatment may be modified. Treatment thus needs to be chosen with care. Such vulnerable groups include older patients, patients with renal impairment or thrombocytopenia, and underweight and obese patients. However, these patient groups are poorly represented in clinical trials, limiting the available data, on which treatment decisions can be based. Meta-analysis of data from randomised clinical trials suggests that the relative treatment effect of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (DXIs) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with respect to major bleeding could be affected by advanced age. No evidence was obtained for a change in the relative risk-benefit profile of DXIs compared to LMWH in patients with renal impairment or of low body weight. The available, albeit limited, data do not support restricting the use of DXIs in patients with CAT on the basis of renal impairment or low body weight. In older patients, age is not itself a critical factor for choice of treatment, but frailty is such a factor. Patients over 70 years of age with CAT should undergo a systematic frailty evaluation before choosing treatment and modifiable bleeding risk factors should be addressed. In patients with renal impairment, creatine clearance should be assessed and monitored regularly thereafter. In patients with an eGFR<30mL/min/1.72m2, the anticoagulant treatment may need to be adapted. Similarly, platelet count should be assessed prior to treatment and monitored regularly. In patients with grade 3-4, thrombocytopenia (<50,000 platelets/μL) treatment with a LMWH at a reduced dose should be considered. For patients with CAT and low body weight, standard anticoagulant treatment recommendations are appropriate, whereas in obese patients, apixaban may be preferred.

Leukopenia associated with lamotrigine initiation after COVID-19 vaccine booster: A case report and literature review

Adverse lamotrigine effects are more likely with concomitant use of antiepileptic drugs, rapid dose titration, and multiple drug use, highlighting the importance of measuring its concentration. Here, lamotrigine was administered the day after the third mRNA vaccination to a 20-year-old bipolar woman with these risk factors. Leukopenia occurred on day 12 without rapid concentration increase, but leukocytes gradually recovered after 22 weeks without discontinuation of lamotrigine. The second mRNA vaccination did not induce leukopenia. Possibly, a synergetic immune response to simultaneous vaccination and lamotrigine caused leukopenia, which recovered as the response weakened. Lamotrigine initiation immediately after mRNA vaccination may be a leukopenia risk factor.

Sabatolimab plus hypomethylating agents in previously untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (STIMULUS-MDS1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Sabatolimab is an immunotherapy targeting T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3), an immuno-myeloid regulator expressed on immune cells and leukaemic stem cells. In this trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of sabatolimab plus hypomethylating agent with placebo plus hypomethylating agents in previously untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

METHODS

STIMULUS-MDS1 was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study done at 54 investigational sites in 17 countries. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with intermediate-risk, high-risk, and very high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (according to Revised International Prognostic Scoring System criteria) who had not received previous treatment were included. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous sabatolimab (400 mg on day 8 and 22) or placebo plus a hypomethylating agent (intravenous decitabine 20 mg/m2 on day 1-5 or intravenous or subcutaneous azacitidine 75 mg/m2 on day 1-7 or day 1-5 and day 8 and 9) every 28 days until treatment discontinuation. The two primary endpoints were complete response rate and progression-free survival, assessed in the full analysis set, which included all randomly assigned patients. Complete response was analysed, as prespecified, 7 months after the last patient was randomly assigned. All other analyses presented, including progression-free survival, were done at the final data cutoff prespecified via a protocol amendment on Sept 2, 2021. Safety was assessed in in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03946670, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between July 29, 2019, and Aug 10, 2020, 127 patients were randomly assigned to sabatolimab plus a hypomethylating agent group (sabatolimab group; n=65) or placebo plus a hypomethylating agent (placebo group; n=62). The median age of participants was 73 years (IQR 69-77), of whom 86 (68%) of 127 patients were male and 77 (61%) were White. The primary endpoints were not met. Complete response (cutoff date of March 10, 2021) was achieved in 14 (22%; 95% CI 12·3-33·5) of 65 patients in the sabatolimab group vs 11 (18%; 9·2-29·5) of 62 patients in the placebo group (p=0·77). At the cutoff date of the final analysis (March 1, 2022), median follow-up for progression-free survival was 17·8 months (IQR 16·6-19·4) in the sabatolimab group and 19·2 months (17·7-22·3) in the placebo group, and the median progression-free survival was 11·1 months (95% CI 7·6-17·6) in the sabatolimab group vs 8·5 months (6·9-11·3) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·75 [95% CI 0·48-1·17]; p=0·1022). The most common adverse events of any grade were neutropenia (35 [56%] of 62 patients in the sabatolimab group vs 43 [68%] of 63 patients in the placebo group), thrombocytopenia (30 [48%] vs 32 [51%]), constipation (29 [47%] vs 24 [38%]), diarrhoea (27 [44%] vs 14 [22%]), anaemia (22 [35%] vs 34 [54%]), febrile neutropenia (22 [35%] vs 15 [24%]), and leukopenia (15 [24%] vs 20 [32%]). One patient developed a serious potential treatment-related immune-mediated adverse event in the sabatolimab group. There was one treatment-related death in the sabatolimab group due to pneumonitis.

INTERPRETATION

The addition of sabatolimab to hypomethylating agents in this study did not result in a significant improvement in complete response rates or progression-free survival. Sabatolimab had a manageable safety in most patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. A randomised phase 3 trial is ongoing to assess the potential benefit of sabatolimab plus azacitidine on overall survival in this setting.

FUNDING

Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Addressing thrombosis concerns in immune thrombocytopenia: the role of fostamatinib in immune thrombocytopenia management

INTRODUCTION

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), a disease that commonly presents with an increased risk of bleeding, can also paradoxically produce an increased risk of thromboembolic events. The risk of thromboembolism can be associated with patient-related factors (e.g. co-morbidities, age and history of thrombosis), disease-related factors (e.g. a greater proportion of younger, more reactive platelets, and the presence of microparticles and pro-inflammatory cytokines) and treatment-related factors (e.g. splenectomy, thrombopoietin receptor agonists, and IVIg).

AREAS COVERED

Aspects of the pathophysiology of ITP and the effects of treatment are discussed with emphasis on individualizing treatment based on the patient's thromboembolic risk, treatment options and preferences.

EXPERT OPINION

An increased understanding of the pathophysiology of ITP has led to the development of new agents such as fostamatinib, a spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Further research into the factors contributing to the risks for bleeding and thromboembolic events can contribute to the development of more specific therapies for ITP and allow greater individualization of therapy based on each patient's medical history and clinical status.

Severe Thrombocytopenia Due to Bone Marrow Failure in Children With Dyskeratosis Congenita Does Not Respond to Eltrombopag Treatment: Case Series

Dyskeratosis congenita is a rare inherited disease with classic cutaneous symptoms, sometimes accompanied with more severe extracutaneous manifestations such as bone marrow failure, which can be lethal. Eltrombopag is an orally available thrombopoietin receptor agonist in clinical use for increasing platelet levels in patients with immune thrombocytopenia and aplastic anemia. Here, 3 pediatric patients with dyskeratosis congenita are presented with varying disease severity, in which off-label eltrombopag treatment had no clinical effect on bone marrow failure. This, in addition to the negative results in a previous case report, supports the preclusion of eltrombopag use in dyskeratosis congenita.

Hematological Toxicity of PARP Inhibitors in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients with Mutations of BRCA or HRR Genes: A Systematic Review and Safety Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

PARP inhibitors (PARPis) are effective treatment options for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) as single agents or in combination with androgen receptor-targeted agents (ARTA). However, a clinically relevant adverse effect of these agents is hematological toxicity, a typical class adverse event (AE), which can lead to treatment modifications and discontinuations.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyze the risk of hematological AEs, including anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia secondary to PARPi treatments in mCRPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) meeting abstracts for clinical trials concerning the use of PARPis, both as single agents and in combination, in patients with mCRPC. The search deadline was 30 June, 2023. We analyzed the pooled incidence of all grades of and ≥ G3 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. We subsequently calculated risk ratios (RRs) for all grades of and ≥ G3 AEs of PARPis versus non-PARPis from randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

RESULTS

Eleven phase 2/3 trials with olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib administered as single agents or combined with ARTA were selected. Anemia was the most common all grades (38.6%) and ≥ G3 AE (24.9%). In the analysis of relative risk, six RCTs were included. The administration of PARPis significantly increased the risk of developing all grades of anemia (RR = 2.44), neutropenia (RR = 3.15), and thrombocytopenia (RR = 4.66) compared with non-PARPis. Similarly, a significant increase in the risk of ≥ G3 anemia (RR = 5.73) and thrombocytopenia (RR = 5.44), and a not significant increased risk of neutropenia (RR = 3.41), were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

In mCRPC, PARPis increase the risk of hematological toxicity compared with other treatments, both as single agents or combined with ARTA (high-quality evidence). Clinicians should be aware of this risk and the correct management, especially with the expected increased PARPis use in mCRPC.

Rethinking coagulation: from enzymatic cascade and cell-based reactions to a convergent model involving innate immune activation

ABSTRACT

Advancements in the conceptual thinking of hemostasis and thrombosis have been catalyzed by major developments within health research over several decades. The cascade model of coagulation was first described in the 1960s, when biochemistry gained prominence through innovative experimentation and technical developments. This was followed by the cell-based model, which integrated cellular coordination to the enzymology of clot formation and was conceptualized during the growth period in cell biology at the turn of the millennium. Each step forward has heralded a revolution in clinical therapeutics, both in procoagulant and anticoagulant treatments to improve patient care. In current times, the COVID-19 pandemic may also prove to be a catalyst: thrombotic challenges including the mixed responses to anticoagulant treatment and the vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia have exposed limitations in our preexisting concepts while simultaneously demanding novel therapeutic approaches. It is increasingly clear that innate immune activation as part of the host response to injury is not separate but integrated into adaptive clot formation. Our review summarizes current understanding of the major molecules facilitating such a cross talk between immunity, inflammation and coagulation. We demonstrate how such effects can be layered upon the cascade and cell-based models to evolve conceptual understanding of the physiology of immunohemostasis and the pathology of immunothrombosis.

A Phase I Trial of Bevacizumab and Temsirolimus in Combination With Valproic Acid in Advanced Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

Preclinical models suggest synergy between anti-angiogenesis therapy, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and histone deacetylase inhibitors to promote anticancer activity.

METHODS

This phase I study enrolled 47 patients between April 2012 and 2018 and determined safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) when combining bevacizumab, temsirolimus, and valproic acid in patients with advanced cancer.

RESULTS

Median age of enrolled patients was 56 years. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 lines of prior therapy. Forty-five patients (95.7%) experienced one or more treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Grade 3 TRAEs were lymphopenia (14.9%), thrombocytopenia (8.5%), and mucositis (6.4%). Grade 4 TRAEs included lymphopenia (2.1%) and CNS cerebrovascular ischemia (2.1%). Six patients developed DLTs across 10 dose levels with grade 3 infection, rash, mucositis, bowel perforation, elevated lipase, and grade 4 cerebrovascular ischemia. The MTD was dose level 9 (bevacizumab 5 mg/kg days 1 and 15 intravenously (IV) plus temsirolimus 25 mg days 1, 8, 15, and 22 IV and valproic acid 5 mg/kg on days 1-7 and 15-21 per orally (PO)). Objective response rate (ORR) was 7.9% with confirmed partial response (PRs) in 3 patients (one each in parotid gland, ovarian, and vaginal cancers). Stable disease (SD) ≥+6 months was seen in 5 patients (13.1%). Clinical benefit state (CBR: PR + SD ≥+6 months) was 21%.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with bevacizumab, temsirolimus, and valproic acid was feasible, but there were numerous toxicities, which will require careful management for future clinical development (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552434).

Avatrombopag-induced lactic acidosis in a patient with severe thrombocytopenia

A woman in her 60s was admitted for refractory thrombocytopenia, initially presumed to be from immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). She was treated with the thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) avatrombopag, as well as prophylactic ciprofloxacin and fluconazole for neutropenia. She developed an anion gap metabolic acidosis with a significantly elevated lactate level peaking at 7.5 mmol/L. Other causes of lactic acidosis including hypovolaemia, sepsis, ischaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis were ruled out. Avatrombopag was discontinued, with quick resolution of the lactic acidosis. Fluconazole and ciprofloxacin were found to inhibit the metabolism of avatrombopag and were also discontinued. Worsening thrombocytopenia prompted a rechallenge with increased dose avatrombopag and severe lactic acidosis again developed, with subsequent quick resolution after drug discontinuation. We conclude that a dose-dependent lactic acidosis occurred with avatrombopag in this case. While other TPO-RAs including eltrombopag have been associated with lactic acidosis, to our knowledge, this is the first report of avatrombopag-induced lactic acidosis.

Efficacy and safety of azathioprine plus prednisone versus prednisone alone as first-line treatment for antinuclear antibody-positive immune thrombocytopenia: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients have an unsatisfactory prognosis due to the more severe conditions of these patients and poor response to first-line glucocorticoids (GCs). The current study intended to compare the efficacy and safety of AZA plus prednisone and prednisone alone as first-line treatment in ANA-positive ITP patients.

METHODS

Fifteen ANA-positive ITP patients receiving AZA plus prednisone (AZA + GC group) and eighteen ANA-positive ITP patients receiving prednisone alone (GC group) as first-line treatment were retrospectively enrolled.

RESULTS

The complete response (CR) rate (60.0% versus 22.2%) (P = 0.038) was increased in the AZA + GC group versus the GC group, while the overall response rate (86.7% versus 55.6%) (P = 0.070) only showed an increasing trend that did not achieve statistical significance. In addition, multivariate analysis revealed that AZA + GC (versus GC) (odds ratio = 31.331, P = 0.018) was independently associated with a higher possibility of achieving CR. Additionally, accumulating relapse-free duration was prolonged in the AZA + GC group versus the GC group (median: 7.8 months versus 3.4 months) (P = 0.038). Additionally, the multivariate analysis suggested that AZA + GC (versus GC) (hazard ratio = 0.306, P = 0.007) was independently correlated with longer accumulating relapse-free duration. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two groups (all P > 0.05), and the common adverse events in the AZA + GC group were pneumonia (13.3%), anemia (13.3%), cough (13.3%), nausea (6.7%), and granulocytopenia (6.7%), which were all tolerable and manageable.

CONCLUSION

First-line AZA plus prednisone realizes a better hematological response and relapse-free duration with acceptable adverse events compared to prednisone alone in ANA-positive ITP patients.

Thrombopoietin level predicts the response to avatrombopag treatment for persistent thrombocytopenia after haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Persistent thrombocytopenia (PT) has an unsatisfactory response to therapy after haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of avatrombopag treatment in 69 patients with PT following haplo-HSCT and assessed whether baseline thrombopoietin (TPO) levels could predict treatment response. Overall response (OR) and complete response (CR) were defined as increased platelet levels to over 20 × 109/L or 50 × 109/L independent of platelet transfusion during or within 7 days of the end of avatrombopag treatment, respectively. The incidences of OR and CR were 72.5% and 58.0%, with a median of 11 and 29 days to OR and CR, respectively. ROC analysis suggested that the optimally discriminant baseline TPO level threshold for both OR and CR to avatrombopag was ≤ 1714 pg/mL. In multivariate analysis, a lower baseline TPO level (P = 0.005) was a significant independent factor of response to avatrombopag. For patients resistant to other TPO receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), 9/16 (56.3%) exhibited a response after switching to avatrombopag. Avatrombopag was well tolerated, and responders achieved improved overall survival (79.0% vs. 91.1%, P = 0.001). In conclusion, avatrombopag is a potential safe and effective treatment for PT after haplo-HSCT, and lower baseline TPO levels predicted a better response.

Romiplostim use for thrombocytopenia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a case series from a single center in Qatar

Thrombocytopenia is a common and serious complication that can occur following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and it contributes to increased morbidity and mortality. The mechanisms of post-HSCT thrombocytopenia are multifactorial and complex. There are no clear consensus and guidelines for managing thrombocytopenia post-HSCT. Recently, there has been promising use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), particularly eltrombopag and romiplostim, as treatments for post-HSCT thrombocytopenia. Notably, that this indication is considered off-label, and data in this use are limited. Based on the existing body of evidence, romiplostim emerges as a safe and effective option for individuals with transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia after HSCT. In this context, we present a summary of our experience at a single center, where romiplostim was used in the management of post-HSCT thrombocytopenia due to poor graft function. Notably, all four cases responded positively to romiplostim treatment, and no significant adverse events were observed.

Efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in solid tumors with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in solid tumors with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, FMRS, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy and safety of TPO-RAs in solid tumors with CIT. The search was limited to articles published before April 30, 2022. Primary outcomes included chemotherapy dose reduction or delays, platelet transfusion, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, and bleeding events. Secondary outcomes encompassed the incidence of platelet count > 400 × 109/L, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, thrombosis, and mortality.

RESULTS

Our analysis encompassed six studies: five rigorous RCTs and one unique study comparing romiplostim to an observation group, involving a total of 489 patients. For primary outcomes, TPO-RAs significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.91). After applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, the significance of the reduction in grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia incidence persisted (P = 0.008). TPO-RAs showed no significant impact on chemotherapy dose reduction or delays (RR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.65-1.01), platelet transfusion (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.48-2.27), or bleeding events (RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.23-1.10). In terms of safety, there were no significant difference in the incidence of any AEs (RR = 0.98, 95% CI:0.92-1.04), serious AEs (RR = 0.79, 95% CI:0.45-1.40), thrombotic events (RR = 1.20, 95% CI:0.51-2.84) and mortality (RR = 1.15, 95% CI:0.55-2.41).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that TPO-RAs are generally well-tolerated. However, their efficacy in solid tumors with CIT appears limited, as they only demonstrate a reduction in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia.