People's feelings and ideas about receiving transplants of different origins--questions of life and death, identity, and nature's border

The aim of this study was to explore the public's feelings and ideas with regard to receiving transplants of different origins. Sixty-nine individuals with varying sociodemographic background, selected from samples who had responded to a questionnaire on receiving and donating organs, were interviewed in-depth. A wide variety of reactions was displayed. The feelings and ideas about receiving organs were summarized in ten categories: 1) the emergency situation; 2) the functioning of the transplant; 3) the influence of transplants on personality, behaviour, and appearance; 4) the influence of transplants on body image; 5) disgust; 6) cannibalism; 7) trespassing nature's border; 8) tradition; 9) ethical considerations; and 10) the debt of gratitude. Most individuals were willing to accept at least one organ. Animal organs were the least preferred. The hierarchy of organ preferences--with organs from a relative at the top and animal organs at the bottom was explained in terms of rational, magical, and analogy thinking. Finally, the consequences for the encounter between health care personnel and transplantation candidates were briefly discussed.

Animal models in xenotransplantation

The severe shortage of donor organs has provided a strong impetus to push the investigation into the use of animal organs for humans. Xenotransplantation will not only benefit patients, but also represents a unique and potentially profitable business opportunity. However, there are many barriers to successful clinical xenotransplantation, including immunological barriers, physiological incompatibility, zoonosis and ethical concerns. This overview will focus on currently available animal models used in attempts to break through the immunological barriers to xenotransplantation. There are many advantages to using small animal, namely rodent, models in xenotransplantation research. For example, the use of the mouse model allows the use of knockout mice and careful dissection of rejection mechanisms at the molecular level. The following models can be used to study hyperacute rejection (HAR): guinea-pig-to-rat, mouse-to-rabbit, guinea-pig-to-mouse, rat-to-presensitised mouse and rat-to-alpha-Gal knockout mouse. The hamster-to-rat, mouse-to-rat and rat-to-mouse models are commonly used to study acute vascular rejection. Large animal models are complex and expensive, but they are more relevant to clinical xenotransplantation. Based on experiments using transgenic pig-to-primate models, HAR can be overcome. However, acute vascular rejection remains a major barrier at the present time. A pig cartilage-to-monkey model has been developed to study chronic rejection. Other novel models such as pig venous segment-to-monkey model and rat-to-primate model may represent viable options to study immunological barriers following xenotransplantation. Like many other medical breakthroughs, animal research will continue to make enormous contributions towards the eventual success of xenotransplantation.

Students' acceptance of clinical xenotransplantation

The aim of this study was to elucidate undergraduate university students' views on clinical xenotransplantation. A total of 1875 students from eight faculties at Uppsala University and the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences answered a questionnaire. Three out of four respondents would be prepared to receive a transplant from an animal on medical grounds if necessary. Forty percent had signed an organ donation card. There was no difference in attitude between those who had signed an allotransplantion card and those who had not. According to gender, age, length of university program, and faculty, results showed that a higher proportion of those who approved were male, young, and studying on programs longer than three years; also, they were more likely to study programs in the Faculties of Agriculture and Pharmacy. At the Medical Faculty, nursing students seemed to be less approving, compared to future biomedical analysts, biomedical scientists, and physicians. The acceptance of xenotransplantation also tended to be positively associated with morally accepting and understanding the use of animals in biomedical research, the approval of euthanasia, the approval of early abortion, and the use of human fetuses in research, as well as clinical testing of humans.

[Some ethical considerations, especially identity, during xenotransplantation]

Provided that a pandemic due to retroviruses or prions eventually transmitted by animals is under control, in accordance with the fundamental ethical rule to serve the best interest of the patient, any organ xenotransplantation raises an important ethical dilemma: how to deliver proper and adapted information to the patient on the preservation of his identity. Xenotransplantation of any part of the brain seems to us unethical.

[Patients' attitudes to xenotransplantation: "I'll do anything, I don't want to die!"]

Transplantation of neural tissue is an effective therapeutical approach in Parkinson's disease, but the method is constrained by the lack of suitable donor material. Embryonic neural tissue from pigs, xenografts, is considered as an alternative source of donor tissue. The attitudes towards neural tissue grafting in general and xenografts in particular were investigated by interviewing a group of patients with Parkinson's disease. The analysis revealed an ambivalence regarding xenografts. A pragmatic view, with priority placed on survival over ethical and other reservations, became apparent.

Issues surrounding xenotransplantation

Currently there is a shortage of cadaver organs that can be transplanted from one human being to another. In response to this shortage, scientists and medical researchers have developed techniques for transplanting animal organs into humans, a procedure known as xenotransplantation. This may address the shortage of organs for patients in need; however, it raises other concerns related to cross-species disease transmission, consent issues, ethical issues of sacrificing animals for their organs, psychological issues of receiving organs from an animal, religious concerns, and economic factors. These medical, ethical, and philosophical issues need to be thoroughly addressed before xenotransplantation becomes a reality.

Attitude of patients toward transplantation of xenogeneic organs

BACKGROUND

The prospect of xenotransplantation has stimulated considerable hopes as well as major concerns. The question of whether or not patients accept xenografts is influenced not only by scientific facts but also by psychological factors. It was the aim of this study to analyze the attitudes of patients toward transplantation of xenogeneic organs and evaluate factors influencing these attitudes.

METHODS

To this end, attitudes toward xenogeneic compared with allogeneic organ grafts were evaluated by means of detailed questionnaires in 1049 patients in Germany, who either had received transplants (n=722) or were on the waiting list for various organ grafts (n=327). Answers were correlated to demographic data as well as to the physical and mental conditions of the patients.

RESULTS

The survey indicates that 77% of patients would accept xenografts while 7% would refuse them if results of xenotransplantation were comparable with those of allotransplantation. If xenotransplantation were associated with increased risks due to more intensive medication 58% would still basically accept xenografts. Acceptance of xenografts was significantly higher in patients who had received transplants and among males. Age, religion, waiting time, and type of organ were not found to influence acceptance rates. Xenografts were thought to be associated with considerable or severe emotional stress by 23% of patients, versus 3% for allografts. The pig was the preferred donor animal, and gene therapeutic manipulation for improvement of results would be accepted by 84%. Inadequate graft function/increased risk of rejection and risk of disease transmission were the major concerns for 60% and 52% of patients, respectively; emotional concerns were the major concerns for 24% and animal-rights concerns for 15%.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show that the potential acceptance rate of xenografts would be quite high, with a more positive attitude in transplanted patients than in waiting-list patients; there was no major difference in acceptance rate for various types of organs. Major concerns about xenotransplantation currently are functional inferiority and transmission of diseases.

Giving and taking--to whom and from whom? People's attitudes toward transplantation of organs and tissue from different sources

The aims of the study were: 1) to describe the willingness of the public to receive material of different origins in one's own body; 2) to compare the willingness to donate and receive body material; 3) to compare the willingness to donate while alive and after death; 4) to compare the willingness to donate to a next-of-kin and unknown recipients. A random sample of 1500 inhabitants, 18 to 70 yr old, in the county of Uppsala, Sweden, were sent a questionnaire asking about their opinion on transplantation and transfusion issues. The response rate was 71%. Ninety-five percent accepted to receive blood transfusion, 89% bone-marrow transplantation, and 85% transplantation of a solid organ. Organs from living donors were preferred (77%), then organs from decreased donors (69%), then artificial organs (63%), and last animal organs (40%). More than half of those accepting transplants made exceptions for some types of organs. The youngest and those with higher education were more positive toward receiving all types of organs than the older ones and those with lower education. Women were less prepared than men to accept animal organs. Those who accepted organs from animals usually also accepted all other types of organs, and were willing to donate organs and tissue more often than those who did not accept to receive animal organs. The readiness to support a sick family member by giving bone-marrow and even a kidney was considerable, 89 and 81%, respectively. The attitudes were less positive with regard to giving blood and bone-marrow to unknown recipients, 54 and 41%, respectively. Sixty-one percent of the respondents were positive toward donating their own organs after death. Of those who were positive, 10% made exceptions for special organs that they did not want to donate, mostly heart, eyes, and brain. Individuals with higher education and young people were more often positive than those with lower education and old people regarding donation of blood and organs, and bone-marrow donation to a relative. Women were somewhat more accepting to donate while alive than males. Thirty-one percent, more often women than men, had signed a donor card and/or registered with the Swedish Organ Donation Registry. The results with regard to receiving organs and tissue are discussed in terms of two different sets of explanations, which can be seen as different sides of the same coin, and mutually strengthening the reactions. The great readiness to donate to a family member as well as the discrepancy between giving in life and after death is commented upon.

[Social and ethical issues of xenotransplantation]

The worldwide shortage in the supply of donor organs and tissues is becoming more pronounced. Xenotransplantation may probably give the hope to overcome the problem ultimately. However, it gives rise to a number of social and ethical issues, among them, the pig appears to be a likely source for human transplantation because it entails least social and ethical issues than no-human primates or other animals and the pig is similar to human in many aspects. The ethical and economic aspects must also be taken into consideration. Patient and his family's privacy may be stripped because the patient has received a new or unusual treatment. Xenograftings will squint towards a kind of commodities which are different from human graftings and it is a challenge to human transplantation. Xenotransplantation brings a risk of creating new human disease and pandemic, so, it is necessary to formulate a policy and provide input to draft guidelines on the regulation of xenotransplantation.

Survey results of transplant patients' attitudes on xenografting

For centuries, many cultures have described mythical creatures with bodies that combined human and animal features, often the result of violating taboos. This study attempted to investigate the beliefs of transplant patients about xenografting. A survey was given to 100 patients ranging in age from 17 to 74 years old, with 65 men and 35 women, including 72 whites, 18 Hispanics, 5 African Americans, and 4 Asian Americans. The subjects included liver, heart, kidney, lung, and multi-organ transplant patients. The patients were not aware of plans for xenografting at the center under study. Eighty patients agreed with xenografting in an emergency situation. Ten subjects replied, "under no circumstances." Ninety percent believed animal research has advanced medical science. In descending order, the patients preferred human (96%), monkey (44%), mechanical (43%), pig (42%), or dog (34%) organs. Twenty-four patients thought a xenograft would change their appearance, personality, or eating or sexual habits. Twenty patients believed animals have souls. The patients also documented any ethical concerns about xenografting.

Recipient and non-recipient attitudes regarding xenotransplantation

Xenotransplantation research has occurred intermittently without success this century and is also not an area without controversy, which includes the potential health risks that could occur and the use of animals. The tremendous discrepancy between those in need of transplantation and the number of living and cadaveric donors has once again renewed interest in this field. The National Kidney Foundation undertook an opinion survey to facilitate understanding of both transplant recipients' and non-recipients' knowledge of, and attitudes toward, xenotransplantation. The majority of respondents approved of the concept and greater than 70% of both groups would consider a xenotransplant. The main concern of both groups was the ability of the animal organ to function properly.

Animal magic? A study about xenografting

The pursuit of an acceptable solution to solve the "transplant gap" continues. Those awaiting an organ transplant have always far exceeded the donor population. Xenografting, the transplantation of organs from one animal species to another is already technically viable; for example, a pig's kidney to a human being (1).