Plasma Androgen Receptor Copy Number Status at Emergence of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Multicohort Analysis

PURPOSE

Increases in androgen receptor (AR) copy number (CN) can be detected in plasma DNA when patients develop metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We aim to evaluate the association between AR CN as a continuous variable and clinical outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PCR2023 was an international, multi-institution, open-label, phase II study of abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone (AAP) or abiraterone acetate plus dexamethasone that included plasma AR assessment as a predefined exploratory secondary end point. Plasma AR CN data (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01867710) from this study (n = 133) were pooled with data from the following three other cohorts: cohort A, which was treated with either AAP or enzalutamide (n = 73); the PREMIERE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02288936) of biomarkers for enzalutamide (n = 94); and a phase II trial from British Columbia (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02125357) that randomly assigned men to either AAP or enzalutamide (n = 201). The primary outcome measures for the biomarker analysis were overall survival and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Using multivariable fractional polynomials analysis using Cox regression models, a nonlinear relationship between plasma AR CN and outcome was identified for overall survival, where initially for small incremental gains in CN there was a large added hazard ratio that plateaued at higher CN. The CN cut point associated with the highest local hazard ratio was 1.92. A similar nonlinear association was observed with progression-free survival. In an exploratory analysis of PCR2023, the time from start of long-term androgen-deprivation therapy to start of AAP or abiraterone acetate plus dexamethasone was significantly shorter in patients with plasma AR CN of 1.92 or greater than patients with plasma AR CN of less than 1.92 (43 v 130 weeks, respectively; P = .005). This was confirmed in cohort A (P = .003), the PREMIERE cohort (P = .03), and the British Colombia cohort (P = .003).

CONCLUSION

Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer can be dichotomized by a plasma AR CN cut point of 1.92. Plasma AR CN value of 1.92 or greater identifies aggressive disease that is poorly responsive to AR targeting and is associated with a prior short response to primary androgen-deprivation therapy.

Identification of single nucleotide variants using position-specific error estimation in deep sequencing data

BACKGROUND

Targeted deep sequencing is a highly effective technology to identify known and novel single nucleotide variants (SNVs) with many applications in translational medicine, disease monitoring and cancer profiling. However, identification of SNVs using deep sequencing data is a challenging computational problem as different sequencing artifacts limit the analytical sensitivity of SNV detection, especially at low variant allele frequencies (VAFs).

METHODS

To address the problem of relatively high noise levels in amplicon-based deep sequencing data (e.g. with the Ion AmpliSeq technology) in the context of SNV calling, we have developed a new bioinformatics tool called AmpliSolve. AmpliSolve uses a set of normal samples to model position-specific, strand-specific and nucleotide-specific background artifacts (noise), and deploys a Poisson model-based statistical framework for SNV detection.

RESULTS

Our tests on both synthetic and real data indicate that AmpliSolve achieves a good trade-off between precision and sensitivity, even at VAF below 5% and as low as 1%. We further validate AmpliSolve by applying it to the detection of SNVs in 96 circulating tumor DNA samples at three clinically relevant genomic positions and compare the results to digital droplet PCR experiments.

CONCLUSIONS

AmpliSolve is a new tool for in-silico estimation of background noise and for detection of low frequency SNVs in targeted deep sequencing data. Although AmpliSolve has been specifically designed for and tested on amplicon-based libraries sequenced with the Ion Torrent platform it can, in principle, be applied to other sequencing platforms as well. AmpliSolve is freely available at https://github.com/dkleftogi/AmpliSolve .

Assessment of the Safety of Glucocorticoid Regimens in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Open-label Phase 2 Study

Importance

Abiraterone acetate is combined with prednisone, 5 mg, twice daily for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and with prednisone, 5 mg, once daily for newly diagnosed, high-risk, metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Understanding the physiological effects of these and other regimens is important.

Objective

To evaluate the safety of abiraterone acetate with 4 glucocorticoid regimens.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Open-label, randomized clinical trial (1:1:1:1) of 164 men with mCRPC from 22 hospitals in 5 countries who were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 intervention groups between June 2013 and October 2014. Analyses were conducted from August 2017 to June 2018.

Interventions

Abiraterone acetate, 1000 mg, once daily with prednisone, 5 mg, twice daily (n = 41), 5 mg once daily (n = 41), 2.5 mg twice daily (n = 40), or dexamethasone, 0.5 mg, once daily (n = 42).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end point was no mineralocorticoid excess (grade ≥1 hypokalemia or grade ≥2 hypertension) through 24 weeks (6 cycles) from treatment.

Results

Of 164 men (median [range] age, 70 [50-90] years) randomized to receive abiraterone acetate, 1000 mg, daily with prednisone, 5 mg, twice daily, once daily, or 2.5 mg twice daily, or dexamethasone, 0.5 mg, once daily, 24 (70.6%) of 34 patients (95% CI, 53.8%-83.2%), 14 (36.8%) of 38 patients (95% CI, 23.4%-52.7%), 21 (60.0%) of 35 patients (95% CI, 43.6%-74.4%), and 26 (70.3%) of 37 patients (95% CI, 54.2%-82.5%), respectively, had no mineralocorticoid excess. Plasma adrenocorticotrophic hormone and urinary mineralocorticoid metabolites after 8 weeks were higher with prednisone, 2.5 mg, twice daily and 5 mg once daily than with 5 mg twice daily or dexamethasone, 0.5 mg, once daily. The level of urinary glucocorticoid metabolites appeared higher in patients who did not meet the primary end point, regardless of glucocorticoid regimen. Total lean body mass decreased in the prednisone groups and total body fat increased in the prednisone, 5 mg, twice daily and dexamethasone groups. In the dexamethasone group, there was an increase in serum insulin and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, while total bone mineral density decreased. In the prednisone, 5 mg, twice daily, 5 mg once daily, 2.5 mg twice daily, and dexamethasone groups, median radiographic progression-free survival was 18.5, 15.3, 12.8, and 26.6 months, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

Abiraterone acetate with prednisone, 5 mg, twice daily or dexamethasone, 0.5 mg, once daily met the prespecified threshold for the primary end point (95% CI excluded 50% mineralocorticoid excess); abiraterone acetate with prednisone, 5 mg, once daily or 2.5 mg twice daily did not meet the threshold. Abiraterone acetate in combination with dexamethasone appeared to be particularly active but may be associated with adverse metabolic consequences.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01867710.

Plasma AR status and cabazitaxel in heavily treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Plasma androgen receptor (AR) copy number status has been identified as a potential biomarker of response in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving docetaxel or the AR-targeted therapies abiraterone or enzalutamide. However, the relevance of plasma AR status in the context of cabazitaxel therapy is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between September 2011 and January 2018, pretherapy plasma samples were collected from 155 patients treated with second- or third-line cabazitaxel at standard or reduced dose in different biomarker protocols. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction was used to identify plasma AR gain and normal samples. The primary objective was to evaluate associations of plasma AR status with treatment outcome. In an exploratory analysis, a comparison between plasma AR and treatment type was investigated by incorporating updated data from our prior study of 85 post-docetaxel patients receiving abiraterone or enzalutamide.

RESULTS

We observed a shorter median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in AR-gained compared to AR-normal patients (OS 10.5 versus 14.1 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-2.13, P = 0.064 and PFS 4.0 versus 5.0 months, HR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.05-2.07, P = 0.024). In patients with mCRPC receiving second-line therapies, a significant treatment interaction was observed between plasma AR and cabazitaxel versus AR-directed therapies for OS (P = 0.041) but not PFS (P = 0.244). In an exploratory analysis, AR-gained patients treated with initial reduced dose of cabazitaxel had a significantly shorter median OS (7.3 versus 11.5 months, HR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.13-3.38, P = 0.016) and PFS (2.7 versus 5.0 months, HR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.39-3.71, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Plasma AR status has a potential clinical utility in patients being considered for cabazitaxel. Validation of these findings in prospective trials is warranted.

Pooled analysis of onapristone extended release (ONA ER) in metastatic cancer patients (pts): A review of liver safety

e14647

Background: ONA, a type I progesterone receptor (PR) antagonist, prevents PR activation by disrupting PR dimerization and DNA binding, and inhibits tumor progression. ONA (immediate release) has efficacy comparable to other endocrine therapies in pts with metastatic breast cancer (BC). The only notable toxicity was transient elevation in liver chemistries in some pts. In 2 clinical trials, ONA ER was given to 88 cancer pts who underwent frequent liver chemistry monitoring. Methods: We pooled and reviewed all liver safety data from 2 trials. A hepatologist (PBW) reviewed all pts with either a hepatobiliary SOC AE or who experienced an elevation > ULN of any liver-related laboratory test. Results: Of 88 pts who received ONA ER for a median 8 weeks (3-51), 59% were female, median age 68 (36-89), 99% Caucasian, 28% had liver metastases (mets), 48% bone mets and 17% also took abiraterone (ABI), which has liver toxicity. 54 pts (61%) experienced any ONA ER-related AE. More AEs were seen in ABI pts (67%), those with liver mets (72%) and BC (76%).. In terms of liver-related TEAEs, overall 10% of pts had ALT and 13% AST elevations, while 20% pts with liver mets had raised ALT/AST and 29% of BC pts. Overall 15% pts had G3 TEAEs, compared to 28% pts with liver mets, mostly due to increased GGT (24%), which has unclear clinical impact. There were no discontinuations for LFT elevations. A relationship between the liver events and ONA ER was judged to be unlikely in each subject, except one. This event was detected at day 29 of treatment and consisted of a marked rise in serum GGT and alkaline phosphatase with only a moderate rise in serum ALT (peak – 262). These abnormalities improved quickly after stopping ONA but recurred on reintroduction: these events are not serious by international criteria and the pt was able to continue ONA at a lower dose for 40 weeks without recurrence Conclusions: The safety experience for ONA ER has been reassuring but must continue to be characterized. For new ONA ER studies, weekly liver chemistry monitoring is planned for the first 4 weeks with Q2W monitoring thereafter. The occasional G3 elevations in serum AST, ALT or bilirubin will prompt interruption, but re-starting treatment at a lower dose should be possible for most pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02052128 and NCT02049190.

Circulating tumor DNA fraction (ctDNA) as a surrogate predictive biomarker in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

5039

Background: Plasma ctDNA is a promising minimally invasive biomarker in mCRPC. Pre-treatment high levels of ctDNA reflect poor prognosis (Romanel et al, Sci Transl Med 2015; Annala et al, Cancer Discov 2018). However, the role of plasma ctDNA in prostate tumour monitoring is largely unexplored. We aimed to determine if monitoring tumour response by quantifying ctDNA levels in plasma could enable early assessment of therapy efficacy for mCRPC. Methods: Between January 2011 and June 2016, 132 sequential plasma samples from 54 mCRPC patients (pts) (30 pre- and 24 post-chemotherapy) treated with abiraterone (abi) were collected. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed on the PGM Ion Torrent using a 316 or 318 Chip to account for 1000X expected coverage per target. We estimated the global tumour content for each sequential plasma sample from study patients by using the approach developed in (Carreira et al, Sci Trasl Med 2014; Romanel et al, Sci Transl Med 2015 ), which extends the CLONET framework (Prandi et al, Genome Biol 2014). Prostate Cancer Working Group -3 (PCWG3) criteria were used to assess clinical, biochemical (PSA) and radiographic (RAD) progression disease (PD). We considered ctDNA PD any increase of ctDNA from baseline value. Results: In our cohort of 54 pts (median age: 75 years, range 70-78), we observed 17 (31.5%) PD, 14 (25.9%) stable disease, and 23 (42.6%) partial/complete response after the first 3 months (mo) abi therapy. The odds ratio (OR) for PD having any increase in ctDNA and a PSA decline < 50% at ~3-mo therapy was 10.83, 95% CI 2.55-45.95, P = 0.001, and 3.27, 95% CI 0.89-12.3, P = 0.074, respectively. In addition, we assessed all 3 types of median PD time from starting abi treatment, suggesting the ability of ctDNA variation to predict overall PD [RAD PD = 6.8 mo, PSA PD = 4.4 mo, and ctDNA PD = 3.0 mo, P = 0.008). An increase of ctDNA levels during the first 3-mo abi treatment was significantly associated with a long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) before plasma sample collection (previous ADT > 24 mo vs 12 > previous ADT ≤23 mo vs < 12 mo: P = 0.036). Conclusions: In mCRPC, an early change in ctDNA fraction may be considered as a predictive biomarker playing a key role in individualized disease monitoring. Prospective evaluation of treatment decisions based on ctDNA is now required.

Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) of metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (M1 CSPC): A pilot molecular analysis in the STAMPEDE multi-center clinical trial

5019

Background: The STAMPEDE trial recruits men with high risk prostate cancer commencing first line systemic therapy. In a pilot study to ascertain the feasibility of tNGS and the prevalence of common genomic aberrations, we tested a commercial clinically-accredited assay on tumor blocks and present data obtained in the largest cohort of treatment-naïve M1 CSPC to date. Methods: Archival FFPE blocks were retrieved from trial participants and a single block submitted for sequencing by a Foundation Medicine. Inc. tNGS assay that includes 395 genes. Results: We successfully obtained tNGS data on 115 (62%) of 186 patients enrolled between Nov-2011 and April-2017 at 15 UK participating centers. The median age was 70 years (IQR 44-85); 97% had de novo M1 disease and 83% Gleason score ≥8. We observed PTEN deficiency (34%) due to copy-number loss (25%) or mutation (9%); TP53 mutation or loss (33%) and aberrations in PI3K signaling (16%), genes involved in DNA repair (14%), Wnt signaling (14%) and cell cycle control (6%). In total, these aberrations were observed in 76% of patients, with 35% harboring two or more. No androgen receptor ( AR) mutations were detected. Conclusions: The prevalence of PTEN deficiency is comparable with that observed in mCRPC consistent with this being a feature of metastatic disease. In contrast, AR mutations are not observed in this treatment-naïve group. The prevalence of DNA repair deficiency is less than observed in mCRPC but more than reported in prostatectomy cohorts. Although it is possible to use FFPE biopsies for tNGS, the test failure-rate poises challenges to evaluating treatments in low prevalence biomarker-defined groups. These data will inform the design and conduct of biomarker-directed trials.

Association of plasma DNA repair deficient (DRD) status with clinical outcome of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) treated with abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone/dexamethasone (+P/D)

5066

Background: Somatic DRD deficiency in 15-30% of mCRPC pts have been observed and inhibition of enzyme poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) could prove beneficial. We aimed to define DRD status using plasma from pts treated on AA and evaluate associations with prospectively-collected outcome measures. Methods: Plasma DNA samples (128 baseline [BL], 134 cycle 2 day 1 [C2D1], 46 progression [PROG]) from chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC pts in a phase 2 study (NCT01867710) evaluating AA+P/D were subjected to custom target-capture next-generation sequencing. DRD assay was optimized and validated to detect pathogenic point mutations, small insertions/deletions, and copy number alternations (DRD+) in 8 DRD genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, FANCA, ATM, CHEK2, HDAC2, BRIP1, and PALB2. Analysis for genomic aberrations was a secondary exploratory objective. Associations with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and radiographic PFS (rPFS) were assessed using Cox regression models and Kaplan Meier analyses. Results: 11.7% of BL and 17.4% of PROG were DRD+. Bi-allelic was observed in 73.3% of BL DRD+ samples. Shorter PFS was observed in BL DRD+ vs DRD- (5.3 vs 15.5 mo; HR: 2.32; 95%CI:1.39-4.28; P < 0.002). Median PFS for BL DRD biallelic + vs DRD biallelic- was 5.1 vs 15.4 mo (HR: 2.49; 95% CI: 1.23-4.38; P < 0.0095). For multivariate analysis using DRD+, ALP, and LDH as covariates, DRD+ (HR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.18-3.75; P < 0.012) and high ALP (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.08-2.56; P < 0.021) were strongly associated with worse PFS. Median OS for BL DRD+ vs DRD- was 28.8 vs 41.3 mo (HR: 1.67; 95%CI:0.88-3.18; P = 0.116). Median rPFS for BL DRD+ vs DRD- was 16.2 vs 20.9 mo (HR: 1.64; 95%CI:0.83-3.21; P = 0.152). Of 39 Pts with BL, C2D1 and PROG samples, 3 were DRD+ (7.7%) at all 3 timepoints, 3 (7.7%) only at BL, 3 (7.7%) only at PROG (bi-allelic), 2 (5.1%) had extra deletion at PROG. Conclusions: Patients with mCRPC harboring DRD+ have worse outcomes with AA and represent a population with an unmet medical need.

A phase II multicenter biomarker trial to study the predictive value of TMPRSS2-ERG before enzalutamide treatment in chemo-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

5040

Background: TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene is a common driver of prostate cancer. The PREMIERE study is a phase II, single arm open-label, multicentre, clinical trial designed to analyse the predictive/prognostic value of TMPRSS2-ERG in first-line chemo-naïve mCRPC patients treated with enzalutamide. Methods: We centrally evaluated TMPRSS2-ERG in diagnostic samples using PCR, FISH and IHC for ERG. Among exploratory biomarkers we included plasma DNA, AR copy number by ddPCR and CTC by AdnaTest. PCWG2 criteria were used for outcome evaluation. We correlated TMPRSS2-ERGand other exploratory biomarkers with mCRPC outcomes. Results: Ninety eight patients with median age 77 y (range 59-95), ECOG 0/1 (54/46%) with mts located in bone (82%), LN (48%) and visceral (17%). With a median FU of 37.3 months, PSA response was PSA50: 82% and PSA90: 53%; median PSA-PFS was 13.7m (95%CI 10.2-19.0), Rad-PFS 26.7m (95%CI: 22.0-NA) and OS 37.5m (95%IC: 33.7-NA). TMPRSS2-ERG was detected in 32 pts (33%), AR gain in 11 pts and CTCs in 35 pts. No differences were observed based on TMPRSS2-ERG status for PSA response (PSA50: 81% vs 83%; p=0.8), PSA-PFS (median 12.8 vs 14.7m; HR 0.98; 95%CI 0.58-1.67; p=0.95), Rad-PFS (median 28.4 vs 26.4m; HR 1.02; 95% 0.53-1.96, p=0.95) or OS (median 36.9 vs 38.1m; HR 1.23; 95%CI 0.69-2.21, p=0.48). Plasma AR gain was associated with worse PSA-PFS (median 4.2 vs 14.7 m; p<0.0001), Rad-PFS (median 3.6 vs 28.4m; p<0.0001) and OS (median 12.7 vs 38.1m; p<0.0001). Plasma DNA and CTCs were also associated with worse outcome. Multivariate analyses of exploratory biomarkers are included in the table. Conclusions: The fusion gene TMPRSS2-ERG is not predictive nor prognostic on enzalutamide treatment in first-line chemo-naïve mCRPC patients. Plasma AR gain and CTCs are strong independent biomarkers associated with adverse outcome. Multivariate analysis of exploratory biomarkers. Clinical trial information: NCT02288936. [Table: see text]

Examination of the additive value of CTC biomarkers of heterogeneity (Het) and chromosomal instability to nuclear-localized (nl) AR-V7+ CTCs in prediction of poor outcomes to androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSi) in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

5075

Background: Prediction of ARSi benefit in mCRPC is an unmet medical need. Recently, the Epic Sciences CTC based nl AR-V7 test validated as a predictive biomarker in two multi-center validation studies and has received Medicare coverage for use in mCRPC. While the nl AR-V7 biomarker is highly specific to resistance and predictive of improved response with taxane Rx, it is a measure of just one mechanism of resistance to ARSis. CTC Het measured by the Shannon Index and CTC chromosomal instability measured by predicted number of Large Scale Transitions (pLST) have both been associated with poor OS to ARSis in previous analysis. Here we investigate the relationship of Het and pLST to nlAR-V7 in order to assess multi-clonal resistance and determine if these biomarkers can provide added sensitivity in the nlAR-V7 negative patient population. Methods: 275 blood samples from 2nd+ line mCRPC patients prior to treatment with ARSi (n=148) or taxanes (n=137) were obtained between 2012 and 2017 from 3 clinical centers. Detectable CTCs in each blood sample were assayed for nlAR-V7, Het, and pLST using the Epic Sciences platform. Biomarkers were analyzed in context of each other and outcomes including clinical co-variates. Results: 94% of samples had detectable CTCs, 84% were evaluable for Het analysis (> 2 CTCs), and 76% were evaluable for pLST (> 3 CTCs). Conclusions: Addition of CTC Het (Shannon Index) and CTC chromosomal instability (pLST) biomarkers to nlAR-V7 identifies an additional 15% of mCRPC pts (38% of total) that are predicted to have poor survival to AR signaling inhibitors. [Table: see text][Table: see text]

Circulating tumor DNA in advanced prostate cancer: transitioning from discovery to a clinically implemented test

The genomic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) differs from that of the primary tumor and is dynamic during tumor progression. The real-time and repeated characterization of this process via conventional solid tumor biopsies is challenging. Alternatively, circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) containing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be obtained from patient plasma using minimally disruptive blood draws and is amenable to sequential analysis. ctDNA has high overlap with the genomic sequences of biopsies from metastases and has the advantage of being representative of multiple metastases. The availability of techniques with high sensitivity and specificity, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital PCR, has greatly contributed to the development of the cfDNA field and enabled the detection of genomic alterations at low ctDNA fractions. In mCRPC, a number of clinically relevant genomic alterations have been tracked in ctDNA, including androgen receptor (AR) aberrations, which have been shown to be associated with an adverse outcome to novel antiandrogen therapies, and alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, which have been associated with a response to PARP inhibitors. Several clinical applications have been proposed for cfDNA analysis, including its use as a prognostic tool, as a predictive biomarker, to monitor tumor response and to identify novel mechanisms of resistance. To date, the cfDNA analysis has provided interesting results, but there is an urgent need for these findings to be confirmed in prospective clinical trials.

Patient-reported outcomes following enzalutamide or placebo in men with non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (PROSPER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In the PROSPER trial, enzalutamide significantly improved metastasis-free survival in patients with non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. Here, we report the results of patient-reported outcomes of this study.

METHODS

In the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 PROSPER trial, done at 254 study sites worldwide, patients aged 18 years or older with non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of up to 10 months were randomly assigned (2:1) via an interactive voice web recognition system to receive oral enzalutamide (160 mg per day) or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by prostate-specific antigen doubling time and baseline use of a bone-targeting agent. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival, reported elsewhere. Secondary efficacy endpoints, reported here, were pain progression (assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form [BPI-SF] questionnaire) and health-related quality of life (assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ-PR25], the EuroQoL 5-Dimensions 5-Levels health questionnaire visual analogue scale [EQ-5D-FL, EQ-VAS], and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate [FACT-P] questionnaires). Patients completed questionnaires at baseline, week 17, and every 16 weeks thereafter until treatment discontinuation. We used predefined questionnaire thresholds to identify clinically meaningful changes. Enrolment for PROSPER is complete and follow-up continues. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02003924.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 26, 2013, and June 28, 2017, 1401 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive enzalutamide (n=933) or placebo (n=468). Median follow-up was 18·5 months (IQR 10·7-29·2) in the enzalutamide group and 15·1 months (7·4-25·9) in the placebo group. Patient-reported outcome scores at baseline were similar between groups. Changes in least squares mean from baseline to week 97 favoured enzalutamide versus placebo for FACT-P social and family wellbeing (0·30 [95% CI -0·25 to 0·85] vs -0·64 [-1·51 to 0·24]; difference 0·94 [95% CI 0·02 to 1·85]; p=0·045) and disfavoured enzalutamide versus placebo for EORTC QLQ-PR25 hormonal treatment-related symptoms (1·55 [0·26 to 2·83) vs -1·83 [-3·86 to 0·20]; difference 3·38 [1·24 to 5·51]; p=0·0020); neither of these changes were clinically meaningful. No significant differences were observed between treatments for changes from baseline to week 97 in any other patient-reported outcome score. Time to clinically meaningful pain progression as assessed by BPI-SF pain severity was longer with enzalutamide than with placebo (median 36·83 months, [95% CI 34·69 to not reached [NR] vs NR; hazard ratio [HR] 0·75 [95% CI 0·57 to 0·97]; p=0·028); there was no significant difference for BPI-SF item 3 or pain interference. Time to clinically meaningful symptom worsening was longer with enzalutamide than with placebo for EORTC QLQ-PR25 urinary symptoms (median 36·86 months [95% CI 33·35 to NR] vs 25·86 [18·53 to 29·47]; HR 0·58 [95% CI 0·46 to 0·72]; p<0·0001) and bowel symptoms (33·15 [29·50 to NR] vs 25·89 [18·43 to 29·67]; 0·72 [0·59 to 0·89]; p=0·0018), and clinically meaningful health-related quality of life as assessed by FACT-P total score (22·11 [18·63 to 25·86] vs 18·43 [14·85-19·35]; 0·83 [0·69 to 0·99]; p=0·037), emotional wellbeing (36·73 [33·12 to 38·21] vs 29·47 [22·18 to 33·15]; 0·69 [0·55 to 0·86]; p=0·0008), and prostate cancer subscale (18·43 [14·85 to 18·66] vs 14·69 [11·07 to 16·20]; 0·79 [0·67 to 0·93]; p=0·0042), although there was no significant difference for other FACT-P scores. Time to clinically meaningful deterioration in EORTC QLQ-PR25 hormonal treatment-related symptoms was shorter with enzalutamide than with placebo (median 33·15 months [95% CI 29·60 to NR] vs 36·83 [29·47 to NR]; HR 1·29 [95% CI 1·02 to 1·63]; p=0·035). Time to deterioration of EQ-VAS was significantly longer for enzalutamide than for placebo (median 22·11 months [95% CI 18·46 to 25·66] vs 14·75 [11·07 to 18·17]; HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·63 to 0·90]; p=0·0013).

INTERPRETATION

Patients with non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving enzalutamide had longer metastasis-free survival than did those who received placebo, while maintaining low pain levels and prostate cancer symptom burden and high health-related quality of life. Enzalutamide showed a clinical benefit by delaying pain progression, symptom worsening, and decrease in functional status, compared with placebo. These findings suggest that enzalutamide is a treatment option that should be discussed with patients presenting with high-risk, non- metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer.

FUNDING

Astellas Pharma Inc, Medivation LLC (a Pfizer Company).

Plasma Androgen Receptor and Docetaxel for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Plasma androgen receptor (AR) gain identifies metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with worse outcome on abiraterone/enzalutamide, but its relevance in the context of taxane chemotherapy is unknown. We aimed to evaluate whether docetaxel is active regardless of plasma AR and to perform an exploratory analysis to compare docetaxel with abiraterone/enzalutamide. This multi-institutional study was a pooled analysis of AR status, determined by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, on pretreatment plasma samples. We evaluated associations between plasma AR and overall/progression-free survival (OS/PFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate in 163 docetaxel-treated patients. OS was significantly shorter in case of AR gain (hazard ratio [HR]=1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.08-2.39, p=0.018), but not PFS (HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.74-1.46, p=0.8) or PSA response (odds ratio=1.14, 95% CI=0.65-1.99, p=0.7). We investigated the interaction between plasma AR and treatment type after incorporating updated data from our prior study of 73 chemotherapy-naïve, abiraterone/enzalutamide-treated patients, with data from 115 first-line docetaxel patients. In an exploratory analysis of mCRPC patients receiving first-line therapies, a significant interaction was observed between plasma AR and docetaxel versus abiraterone/enzalutamide for OS (HR=0.16, 95% CI=0.06-0.46, p<0.001) and PFS (HR=0.31, 95% CI=0.12-0.80, p=0.02). Specifically, we reported a significant difference for OS favoring abiraterone/enzalutamide for AR-normal patients (HR=1.93, 95% CI=1.19-3.12, p=0.008) and a suggestion favoring docetaxel for AR-gained patients (HR=0.53, 95% CI=0.24-1.16, p=0.11). These data suggest that AR-normal patients should receive abiraterone/enzalutamide and AR-gained could benefit from docetaxel. This treatment selection merits prospective evaluation in a randomized trial. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated whether plasma androgen receptor (AR) predicted outcome in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with docetaxel, and we performed an exploratory analysis in patients treated with docetaxel or AR-directed drugs as first-line mCRPC therapy. We showed that plasma AR normal favored hormonal treatment, whilst plasma AR-gained patients may have had a longer response to docetaxel, suggesting that plasma AR status could be a useful treatment selection biomarker.

Plasma AR status and cabazitaxel in heavily-treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

203

Background: Plasma androgen receptor ( AR) copy number status has been identified as a potential biomarker of response in mCRPC patients receiving docetaxel or the AR-targeted therapies abiraterone or enzalutamide. However, the relevance of plasma AR status in the context of cabazitaxel therapy is unknown. Methods: Between September 2011 and January 2018, pre-therapy plasma samples were collected from 155 patients treated with second or third-line cabazitaxel at standard or reduced dose in different biomarker protocols. Droplet digital PCR was used to identify plasma AR gain and normal samples, with the primary objective to evaluate associations of plasma AR status with treatment outcome. In an exploratory analysis, a comparison between plasma AR status and treatment type was investigated by incorporating updated data from our prior study of 85 post-docetaxel patients receiving abiraterone or enzalutamide. Results: We observed a shorter median overall/progression-free survival (OS/PFS) in AR-gained compared to AR-normal patients (OS 10.5 versus 14.1 months, hazard ratio (HR) 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-2.13, P = 0.064), and (PFS 4.0 versus 5.0 months, HR 1.47, 95%CI 1.05-2.07, P = 0.024). In mCRPC patients receiving second-line therapies, a significant treatment interaction was observed between plasma AR and cabazitaxel versus AR-directed therapies for OS (P = 0.041) but not PFS (P = 0.244). In an exploratory analysis, AR-gained patients treated with initial reduced-dose of cabazitaxel had a significantly shorter median OS (7.3 versus 11.5 months, HR 1.95, 95%CI 1.13-3.38, P = 0.016), and PFS (2.7 versus 5.0 months, HR 2.27, 95%CI 1.39-3.71, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Plasma AR status has a potential clinical utility in patients being considered for cabazitaxel. Validation of these findings in prospective trials are warranted.

Plasma DNA Analysis in Prostate Cancer: Opportunities for Improving Clinical Management

BACKGROUND

Molecular characterization of tumors could be important for clinical management. Plasma DNA obtained noninvasively as a liquid biopsy could be widely applicable for clinical implementation in biomarker-based treatment strategies.

CONTENT

Prostate cancer is a disease with variable clinical outcomes and molecular features and therefore presents multiple opportunities for biomarker-based treatment optimization. Tissue analysis may not be representative of the lethal clone in localized disease or of intrapatient, intermetastases heterogeneity; fresh tissue is often challenging to obtain by biopsy of metastasis, whereas archival samples may not represent current disease and may be of insufficient quality. Plasma DNA is of variable tumor-to-normal fraction that requires accurate estimation using sensitively measured genomic events. In plasma with sufficient tumor content, the spectrum of genomic aberrations closely resembles tissue and could be used to molecularly characterize patients in real time. In this review we discuss the opportunities for improving clinical management by using plasma DNA analysis in different clinical scenarios across the disease spectrum, from detection of prostate cancer and disease relapse to treatment response prediction, response assessment, and interrogation of treatment resistance in metastatic prostate cancer. Combinational strategies may incorporate other modalities, including circulating tumor cells, circulating microRNA, and extracellular vesicles analysis, which could help to achieve more accurate characterization.

SUMMARY

There are many opportunities for plasma DNA analyses to change clinical management. However, there are challenges that need to be addressed to clinically implement a test, including the development of accurate, fit for purpose, and technically reproducible assay, followed by prospective validation in a large cohort of patients.

Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Based on previous findings, we hypothesised that radiotherapy to the prostate would improve overall survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer, and that the benefit would be greatest in patients with a low metastatic burden. We aimed to compare standard of care for metastatic prostate cancer, with and without radiotherapy.

METHODS

We did a randomised controlled phase 3 trial at 117 hospitals in Switzerland and the UK. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. We randomly allocated patients open-label in a 1:1 ratio to standard of care (control group) or standard of care and radiotherapy (radiotherapy group). Randomisation was stratified by hospital, age at randomisation, nodal involvement, WHO performance status, planned androgen deprivation therapy, planned docetaxel use (from December, 2015), and regular aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Standard of care was lifelong androgen deprivation therapy, with up-front docetaxel permitted from December, 2015. Men allocated radiotherapy received either a daily (55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks) or weekly (36 Gy in six fractions over 6 weeks) schedule that was nominated before randomisation. The primary outcome was overall survival, measured as the number of deaths; this analysis had 90% power with a one-sided α of 2·5% for a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·75. Secondary outcomes were failure-free survival, progression-free survival, metastatic progression-free survival, prostate cancer-specific survival, and symptomatic local event-free survival. Analyses used Cox proportional hazards and flexible parametric models, adjusted for stratification factors. The primary outcome analysis was by intention to treat. Two prespecified subgroup analyses tested the effects of prostate radiotherapy by baseline metastatic burden and radiotherapy schedule. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00268476.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 22, 2013, and Sept 2, 2016, 2061 men underwent randomisation, 1029 were allocated the control and 1032 radiotherapy. Allocated groups were balanced, with a median age of 68 years (IQR 63-73) and median amount of prostate-specific antigen of 97 ng/mL (33-315). 367 (18%) patients received early docetaxel. 1082 (52%) participants nominated the daily radiotherapy schedule before randomisation and 979 (48%) the weekly schedule. 819 (40%) men had a low metastatic burden, 1120 (54%) had a high metastatic burden, and the metastatic burden was unknown for 122 (6%). Radiotherapy improved failure-free survival (HR 0·76, 95% CI 0·68-0·84; p<0·0001) but not overall survival (0·92, 0·80-1·06; p=0·266). Radiotherapy was well tolerated, with 48 (5%) adverse events (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3-4) reported during radiotherapy and 37 (4%) after radiotherapy. The proportion reporting at least one severe adverse event (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or worse) was similar by treatment group in the safety population (398 [38%] with control and 380 [39%] with radiotherapy).

INTERPRETATION

Radiotherapy to the prostate did not improve overall survival for unselected patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Astellas, Clovis Oncology, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis.

Addition of Docetaxel to First-line Long-term Hormone Therapy in Prostate Cancer (STAMPEDE): Modelling to Estimate Long-term Survival, Quality-adjusted Survival, and Cost-effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Results from large randomised controlled trials have shown that adding docetaxel to the standard of care (SOC) for men initiating hormone therapy for prostate cancer (PC) prolongs survival for those with metastatic disease and prolongs failure-free survival for those without. To date there has been no formal assessment of whether funding docetaxel in this setting represents an appropriate use of UK National Health Service (NHS) resources.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether administering docetaxel to men with PC starting long-term hormone therapy is cost-effective in a UK setting.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We modelled health outcomes and costs in the UK NHS using data collected within the STAMPEDE trial, which enrolled men with high-risk, locally advanced metastatic or recurrent PC starting first-line hormone therapy.

INTERVENTION

SOC was hormone therapy for ≥2 yr and radiotherapy in some patients. Docetaxel (75mg/m2) was administered alongside SOC for six three-weekly cycles.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The model generated lifetime predictions of costs, changes in survival duration, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The model predicted that docetaxel would extend survival (discounted quality-adjusted survival) by 0.89 yr (0.51) for metastatic PC and 0.78 yr (0.39) for nonmetastatic PC, and would be cost-effective in metastatic PC (ICER £5514/QALY vs SOC) and nonmetastatic PC (higher QALYs, lower costs vs SOC). Docetaxel remained cost-effective in nonmetastatic PC when the assumption of no survival advantage was modelled.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel is cost-effective among patients with nonmetastatic and metastatic PC in a UK setting. Clinicians should consider whether the evidence is now sufficiently compelling to support docetaxel use in patients with nonmetastatic PC, as the opportunity to offer docetaxel at hormone therapy initiation will be missed for some patients by the time more mature survival data are available.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Starting docetaxel chemotherapy alongside hormone therapy represents a good use of UK National Health Service resources for patients with prostate cancer that is high risk or has spread to other parts of the body.

Plasma androgen receptor and serum chromogranin A in advanced prostate cancer

Recently, mixed forms between adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) have emerged that are characterized by persistent androgen receptor (AR)-signalling and elevated chromogranin A (CgA) levels. The main aim of this study was to analyze castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide, assessing progression-free/overall survival (PFS/OS) in association with circulating AR and CgA. AR aberrations were analyzed by droplet digital PCR in pre-treatment plasma samples collected from two biomarker protocols [197 patients from a retrospective study (REC 2192/2013) and 59 from a prospective trial (REC 6798/2015)]. We subdivided patients into three groups according to CgA by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In the primary cohort, plasma AR gain and mutations (p.L702H/p.T878A) were detected in 78 (39.6%) and 16 (8.1%) patients, respectively. We observed a significantly worse PFS/OS in patients with higher-CgA than in patients with normal-CgA, especially those with no AR-aberrations. Multivariable analysis showed AR gain, higher-CgA and LDH levels as independent predictors of PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.16, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.50-3.12, p < 0.0001, HR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.06-2.84, p = 0.026, and HR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.45-3.13, p = 0.0001, respectively) and OS (HR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.15-2.57, p = 0.008, HR = 3.63, 95% CI 2.13-6.20, p < 0.0001, and HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.54-3.48, p < 0.0001, respectively). These data were confirmed in the secondary cohort. Pre-treatment CgA detection could be useful to identify these mixed tumors and would seem to have a prognostic role, especially in AR-normal patients. This association needs further evaluation in larger prospective cohorts.

Phase II pilot study of the prednisone to dexamethasone switch in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with limited progression on abiraterone plus prednisone (SWITCH study)

BACKGROUND

Despite most metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients benefit from abiraterone acetate plus prednisone 5 mg bid (AA + P), resistance eventually occurs. Long-term use of prednisone has been suggested as one of the mechanisms driving resistance, which may be reversed by switching to another steroid.

METHODS

SWITCH was a single-arm, open-label, single-stage phase II study. The primary objective was to evaluate the antitumour activity of abiraterone acetate plus dexamethasone 0.5 mg daily (AA + D) in mCRPC patients progressing to AA + P. Clinically stable mCRPC patients who had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or limited radiographic progression after at least 12 weeks on AA + P, were eligible. The primary endpoint was measured as the proportion of patients achieving a PSA decline of  ≥ 30% (PSA30) from baseline after 6 weeks on AA + D. Secondary endpoints included: PSA50 response rate at 12 weeks, time to biochemical and radiological progression, overall survival, safety profile evaluation, benefit from subsequent treatment lines and the identification of biomarkers of response (AR copy number, TMPRSS2-ERG status and PTEN expression).

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were enrolled. PSA30 and PSA50 were 46.2% and 34.6%, respectively. Median time to biochemical and radiological progression were 5.3 and 11.8 months, respectively. Two radiological responses were observed. Median overall survival was 20.9 months. Patients with AR gain detected in plasma circulating tumour DNA did not respond to switch, whereas patients with AR normal status benefited the most. No significant toxicities were observed and PSA50 response rate to subsequent taxane was 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected clinical stable mCRPC patients with limited disease progression on AA + P, a steroid switch from prednisone to dexamethasone can lead to PSA and radiological responses.

Assessment of the Validity of Nuclear-Localized Androgen Receptor Splice Variant 7 in Circulating Tumor Cells as a Predictive Biomarker for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Importance

A blood test to determine whether to treat patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with an androgen receptor signaling (ARS) inhibitor or taxane is an unmet medical need.

Objective

To determine whether a validated assay for the nuclear-localized androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) protein in circulating tumor cells can determine differential overall survival among patients with mCRPC treated with taxanes vs ARS inhibitors.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This blinded correlative study conducted from December 31, 2012, to September 1, 2016, included 142 patients with histologically confirmed mCRPC and who were treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, The Royal Marsden, or the London Health Sciences Centre. Blood samples were obtained prior to administration of ARS inhibitors or taxanes as a second-line or greater systemic therapy for progressing mCRPC.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall survival after treatment with an ARS inhibitor or taxane in relation to pretherapy AR-V7 status.

Results

Among the 142 patients in the study (mean [SD] age, 69.5 [9.6] years), 70 were designated as high risk by conventional prognostic factors. In this high-risk group, patients positive for AR-V7 who were treated with taxanes had superior overall survival relative to those treated with ARS inhibitors (median overall survival, 14.3 vs 7.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.28-1.39; P = .25). Patients negative for AR-V7 who were treated with ARS inhibitors had superior overall survival relative to those treated with taxanes (median overall survival, 19.8 vs 12.8 months; hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.00-2.81; P = .05).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that nuclear-localized AR-V7 protein in circulating tumor cells can identify patients who may live longer with taxane chemotherapy vs ARS inhibitor treatment.

An open-label, multicenter, phase Ib study investigating the effect of apalutamide on ventricular repolarization in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Phase Ib study evaluating the effect of apalutamide, at therapeutic exposure, on ventricular repolarization by applying time-matched pharmacokinetics and electrocardiography (ECG) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Safety of daily apalutamide was also assessed.

METHODS

Patients received 240 mg oral apalutamide daily. Time-matched ECGs were collected via continuous 12-lead Holter recording before apalutamide (Day - 1) and on Days 1 and 57 (Cycle 3 Day 1). Pharmacokinetics of apalutamide were assessed on Days 1 and 57 at matched time points of ECG collection. QT interval was corrected for heart rate using Fridericia correction (QTcF). The primary endpoint was the maximum mean change in QTcF (ΔQTcF) from baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 (steady state). Secondary endpoints were the effect of apalutamide on other ECG parameters, pharmacokinetics of apalutamide and its active metabolite, relationship between plasma concentrations of apalutamide and QTcF, and safety.

RESULTS

Forty-five men were enrolled; 82% received treatment for ≥ 3 months. At steady state, the maximum ΔQTcF was 12.4 ms and the upper bound of its associated 90% CI was 16.0 ms. No clinically meaningful effects of apalutamide were reported for heart rate or other ECG parameters. A concentration-dependent increase in QTcF was observed for apalutamide. Most adverse events (AEs) (73%) were grade 1-2 in severity. No patients discontinued due to QTc prolongation or AEs.

CONCLUSION

The effect of apalutamide on QTc prolongation was modest and does not produce a clinically meaningful effect on ventricular repolarization. The AE profile was consistent with other studies of apalutamide.

Abiraterone Alone or in Combination With Enzalutamide in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With Rising Prostate-Specific Antigen During Enzalutamide Treatment

Purpose Enzalutamide resistance could result from raised androgens and be overcome by combination with abiraterone acetate. PLATO ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01995513) interrogated this hypothesis using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Patients and Methods In period one, men with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer received open-label enzalutamide 160 mg daily. Men with no prostate-specific antigen (PSA) increase at weeks 13 and 21 were treated until PSA progression (≥ 25% increase and ≥ 2 ng/mL above nadir), then randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio in period two to abiraterone acetate 1,000 mg daily and prednisone 5 mg twice daily with either enzalutamide or placebo (combination or control group, respectively) until disease progression as defined by the primary end point: progression-free survival (radiographic or unequivocal clinical progression or death during study). Secondary end points included time to PSA progression and PSA response in period two. Results Of 509 patients enrolled in period one, 251 were randomly assigned in period two. Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months in the combination group and 5.6 months in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.12; P = .22). There was no difference in the secondary end points. Grade 3 hypertension (10% v 2%) and increased ALT (6% v 2%) or AST (2% v 0%) were more frequent in the combination than the control group. Conclusion Combining enzalutamide with abiraterone acetate and prednisone is not indicated after PSA progression during treatment with enzalutamide alone; hypertension and elevated liver enzymes are more frequent with combination therapy.

Sequencing of prostate cancers identifies new cancer genes, routes of progression and drug targets

Prostate cancer represents a substantial clinical challenge because it is difficult to predict outcome and advanced disease is often fatal. We sequenced the whole genomes of 112 primary and metastatic prostate cancer samples. From joint analysis of these cancers with those from previous studies (930 cancers in total), we found evidence for 22 previously unidentified putative driver genes harboring coding mutations, as well as evidence for NEAT1 and FOXA1 acting as drivers through noncoding mutations. Through the temporal dissection of aberrations, we identified driver mutations specifically associated with steps in the progression of prostate cancer, establishing, for example, loss of CHD1 and BRCA2 as early events in cancer development of ETS fusion-negative cancers. Computational chemogenomic (canSAR) analysis of prostate cancer mutations identified 11 targets of approved drugs, 7 targets of investigational drugs, and 62 targets of compounds that may be active and should be considered candidates for future clinical trials.

Adding abiraterone or docetaxel to long-term hormone therapy for prostate cancer: directly randomised data from the STAMPEDE multi-arm, multi-stage platform protocol

Background

Adding abiraterone acetate with prednisolone (AAP) or docetaxel with prednisolone (DocP) to standard-of-care (SOC) each improved survival in systemic therapy for advanced or metastatic prostate cancer: evaluation of drug efficacy: a multi-arm multi-stage platform randomised controlled protocol recruiting patients with high-risk locally advanced or metastatic PCa starting long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The protocol provides the only direct, randomised comparative data of SOC + AAP versus SOC + DocP.

Method

Recruitment to SOC + DocP and SOC + AAP overlapped November 2011 to March 2013. SOC was long-term ADT or, for most non-metastatic cases, ADT for ≥2 years and RT to the primary tumour. Stratified randomisation allocated pts 2 : 1 : 2 to SOC; SOC + docetaxel 75 mg/m2 3-weekly×6 + prednisolone 10 mg daily; or SOC + abiraterone acetate 1000 mg + prednisolone 5 mg daily. AAP duration depended on stage and intent to give radical RT. The primary outcome measure was death from any cause. Analyses used Cox proportional hazards and flexible parametric models, adjusted for stratification factors. This was not a formally powered comparison. A hazard ratio (HR) <1 favours SOC + AAP, and HR > 1 favours SOC + DocP.

Results

A total of 566 consenting patients were contemporaneously randomised: 189 SOC + DocP and 377 SOC + AAP. The patients, balanced by allocated treatment were: 342 (60%) M1; 429 (76%) Gleason 8-10; 449 (79%) WHO performance status 0; median age 66 years and median PSA 56 ng/ml. With median follow-up 4 years, 149 deaths were reported. For overall survival, HR = 1.16 (95% CI 0.82-1.65); failure-free survival HR = 0.51 (95% CI 0.39-0.67); progression-free survival HR = 0.65 (95% CI 0.48-0.88); metastasis-free survival HR = 0.77 (95% CI 0.57-1.03); prostate cancer-specific survival HR = 1.02 (0.70-1.49); and symptomatic skeletal events HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.55-1.25). In the safety population, the proportion reporting ≥1 grade 3, 4 or 5 adverse events ever was 36%, 13% and 1% SOC + DocP, and 40%, 7% and 1% SOC + AAP; prevalence 11% at 1 and 2 years on both arms. Relapse treatment patterns varied by arm.

Conclusions

This direct, randomised comparative analysis of two new treatment standards for hormone-naïve prostate cancer showed no evidence of a difference in overall or prostate cancer-specific survival, nor in other important outcomes such as symptomatic skeletal events. Worst toxicity grade over entire time on trial was similar but comprised different toxicities in line with the known properties of the drugs.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00268476.

Plasma DNA and Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The Odyssey to a Clinical Biomarker Test

Comprehensive plasma DNA analysis identifies clinically actionable genomic aberrations. Cancers harboring disruption of TP53 or BRCA2 or ATM detected in plasma have significantly worse outcomes on novel AR targeting. Cancer Discov; 8(4); 392-4. ©2018 AACR.See related article by Annala et al., p. 444.

Consensus statement on circulating biomarkers for advanced prostate cancer

299

Background: The need for validated circulating biomarkers is well recognised in advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Circulating biomarkers evaluating plasma cell-free nucleic acids and circulating tumour cells are being investigated for their clinical utility. There has been a lack of consensus with regards to analyses, reporting and clinical effectiveness of these biomarkers. A consensus meeting was held to address these issues. Methods: A multi-disciplinary panel comprising 18 international prostate cancer experts (including surgeons, medical and radiation oncologists) were consulted prior to the consensus meeting. Four key areas relating to the field of circulating biomarkers were deemed important for discussion: 1) The current utility of circulating biomarkers in 2017; 2) The clinical needs for circulating biomarkers in PCa; 3) The most pressing blood-based molecular assays required; and 4) The steps necessary for developing circulating biomarkers. Using a modified Delphi process, 50 consensus questions were pre-defined for the panel to answer by voting anonymously but publicly at the consensus meeting. Results: A consensus was declared (i.e. ≥ 75% of panellists who did not vote ‘unqualified’ or ‘abstain’ chose the same opinion) in 12/50 (24%) questions. A further 8/50 (16%) of replies were close to reaching consensus (≥ 60% of panellists choosing the same answer). The panel agreed that there is a very high and urgent unmet need for predictive biomarkers, with consensus that DNA repair biomarkers in particular are needed urgently. Metastatic PCa was identified as having the highest clinical need for development of biomarkers to measure response and as surrogate endpoints. Panellists unanimously voted that reproducibility validation studies are of paramount importance. The consensus panel also predicted that cfDNA will impact practice by 2020. Conclusions: This expert consensus identified the need for clinical trials of validated circulating biomarkers to develop predictive, response and surrogacy assays. These could have major clinical and healthcare economic implications, minimizing over-treatment and allowing the delivery of more precise patient care.

Validation of nuclear-localized AR-V7 on circulating tumor cells (CTC) as a treatment-selection biomarker for managing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

273

Background: A previous analysis of 161 patients (pts) tested for nuclear-localized AR-V7(+) CTCs showed a therapy interaction between AR-V7 positivity and improved overall survival (OS) on taxane chemotherapy vs. androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI). To validate the use of the biomarker result for physician decision making, we prospectively analyzed an independent, multicenter, blinded, cross-sectional cohort (n = 225) to confirm a therapy interaction with AR-V7. We corrected for possible pt selection bias by the treating physician by analyzing the association of therapy to OS in low and high risk groups defined by the test cohort. Methods: Two analyses were performed: (1) the validation of a therapy interaction between AR-V7 positivity and superior OS benefit for pts treated with taxanes in the context of use for 2nd+ line pts; and (2) as the choice between ARSI or taxanes was at the discretion of the attending physician, pt risk was incorporated into the predictive biomarker assessment. A pt-specific risk score was developed from line of therapy and other covariates to stratify pts as low and high risk, and the association of AR-V7 status and OS was performed within each risk group to correct for physician decision making and address possible confounding with treatment assignment. Results: (1) A therapy interaction between AR-V7(+) pts and lower risk of death on taxanes vs. ARSI (HR: 0.23, p = 0.003, 95% CI: 0.09 – 0.61) was validated. (2) In the validation cohort, high risk AR-V7(+) pts had an OS benefit when treated with taxanes (p = 0.02) and the AR-V7(-) pts had an improved OS with ARSI therapy (p = 0.02). AR-V7 incidence was low in the low risk pts, precluding the analysis for this sub-cohort. Conclusions: The results validate that the nuclear-localized AR-V7(+) biomarker has an interaction with therapy and improved survival on taxanes. Further, when adjusting for pt risk, the biomarker is predictive of OS in the high risk group. Nuclear-localized AR-V7 protein in CTCs can aid in the decision between ARSI and taxane chemotherapy in the 2nd or greater line of therapy for mCRPC.

Treatment-induced changes in the androgen receptor axis: Liquid biopsies as diagnostic/prognostic tools for prostate cancer

Prostate cancer progression and treatment relapse is associated with changes in the androgen receptor axis, and analysis of alternations of androgen receptor signaling is valuable for prognostics and treatment optimization. The profile of androgen receptor axis is currently obtained from biopsy specimens, which are not always easy to obtain. Moreover, the information acquired only provides a snapshot of the tumor biology, with strict spatial and temporal limitations. On the other hand, circulation is easily accessible source of both circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA, which can be sampled at numerous time points. This Review will explore the potential use of androgen receptor axis alternations detectable in the blood in therapeutic decision-making and precision medicine for advancing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: The Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference APCCC 2017

BACKGROUND

In advanced prostate cancer (APC), successful drug development as well as advances in imaging and molecular characterisation have resulted in multiple areas where there is lack of evidence or low level of evidence. The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2017 addressed some of these topics.

OBJECTIVE

To present the report of APCCC 2017.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Ten important areas of controversy in APC management were identified: high-risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer; "oligometastatic" prostate cancer; castration-naïve and castration-resistant prostate cancer; the role of imaging in APC; osteoclast-targeted therapy; molecular characterisation of blood and tissue; genetic counselling/testing; side effects of systemic treatment(s); global access to prostate cancer drugs. A panel of 60 international prostate cancer experts developed the program and the consensus questions.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 150 predefined questions, which have been developed following a modified Delphi process.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Voting is based on panellist opinion, and thus is not based on a standard literature review or meta-analysis. The outcomes of the voting had varying degrees of support, as reflected in the wording of this article, as well as in the detailed voting results recorded in Supplementary data.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented expert voting results can be used for support in areas of management of men with APC where there is no high-level evidence, but individualised treatment decisions should as always be based on all of the data available, including disease extent and location, prior therapies regardless of type, host factors including comorbidities, as well as patient preferences, current and emerging evidence, and logistical and economic constraints. Inclusion of men with APC in clinical trials should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2017 again identified important areas in need of trials specifically designed to address them.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The second Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference APCCC 2017 did provide a forum for discussion and debates on current treatment options for men with advanced prostate cancer. The aim of the conference is to bring the expertise of world experts to care givers around the world who see less patients with prostate cancer. The conference concluded with a discussion and voting of the expert panel on predefined consensus questions, targeting areas of primary clinical relevance. The results of these expert opinion votes are embedded in the clinical context of current treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer and provide a practical guide to clinicians to assist in the discussions with men with prostate cancer as part of a shared and multidisciplinary decision-making process.

Circulating AR copy number and outcome to enzalutamide in docetaxel-treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the association of circulating AR copy number (CN) and outcome in a cohort of patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with enzalutamide after docetaxel. Fifty-nine CRPC patients were evaluated. AR CN was analyzed with real-time and digital PCR in the serum collected at starting of treatment. Progressive disease was defined on the basis of Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria. AR CN gain was found in 21 of 59 (36%) patients. Median baseline PSA, alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase levels were higher in the AR CN gained group (p = 0.007, p = 0.003, p = 0.0009, respectively). Median PFS of patients with AR CN gain was 2.4 (95%CI: 1.9−3.2) vs. 4.0 months (95%CI: 3.0−6.5) of those with no gain (p = 0.0004). Median OS of patients with AR CN gain was 6.1 (95%CI: 3.4−8.6) vs. 14.1 months (95%CI: 8.2−20.5) of those with no gain (p = 0.0003). At multivariate analysis, PSA decline ≥ 50% and AR CN showed a significant association with PFS (p = 0.008 and p = 0.002, respectively) and OS (p = 0.009 and p = 0.001, respectively). These findings indicate that the detection of circulating AR CN gain is a promising non-invasive biomarker for outcome prediction to enzalutamide treatment in CRPC patients.

Role of Androgen Receptor Variants in Prostate Cancer: Report from the 2017 Mission Androgen Receptor Variants Meeting

CONTEXT

Although a number of studies have demonstrated the importance of constitutively active androgen receptor variants (AR-Vs) in prostate cancer, questions still remain about the precise role of AR-Vs in the progression of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

OBJECTIVE

Key stakeholders and opinion leaders in prostate cancer convened on May 11, 2017 in Boston to establish the current state of the field of AR-Vs.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The meeting "Mission Androgen Receptor Variants" was the second of its kind sponsored by the Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF). This invitation-only event was attended by international leaders in the field and representatives from sponsoring organizations (PCF and industry sponsors). Eighteen faculty members gave short presentations, which were followed by in-depth discussions. Discussions focused on three thematic topics: (1) potential of AR-Vs as biomarkers of therapeutic resistance; (2) role of AR-Vs as functionally active CRPC progression drivers; and (3) utility of AR-Vs as therapeutic targets in CRPC.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The three meeting organizers synthesized this meeting report, which is intended to summarize major data discussed at the meeting and identify key questions as well as strategies for addressing these questions. There was a critical consensus that further study of the AR-Vs is an important research focus in CRPC. Contrasting views and emphasis, each supported by data, were presented at the meeting, discussed among the participants, and synthesized in this report.

CONCLUSIONS

This article highlights the state of knowledge and outlines the most pressing questions that need to be addressed to advance the AR-V field.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Although further investigation is needed to delineate the role of androgen receptor (AR) variants in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, advances in measurement science have enabled development of blood-based tests for treatment selection. Detection of AR variants (eg, AR-V7) identified a patient population with poor outcomes to existing AR-targeting therapies, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic agents currently under development.

Phenotypic diversity of circulating tumour cells in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To use a non-biased assay for circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) in order to identify non-traditional CTC phenotypes potentially excluded by conventional detection methods that are reliant on antigen- and/or size-based enrichment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 41 patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) and 20 healthy volunteers were analysed on the Epic CTC platform, via high-throughput imaging of DAPI expression and CD45/cytokeratin (CK) immunofluorescence (IF) on all circulating nucleated cells plated on glass slides. To confirm the PCa origin of CTCs, IF was used for androgen receptor (AR) expression and fluorescence in situ hybridization was used for PTEN and ERG assessment.

RESULTS

Traditional CTCs (CD45- /CK+ /morphologically distinct) were identified in all patients with mCRPC and we also identified CTC clusters and non-traditional CTCs in patients with mCRPC, including CK- and apoptotic CTCs. Small CTCs (≤white blood cell size) were identified in 98% of patients with mCRPC. Total, traditional and non-traditional CTCs were significantly increased in patients who were deceased vs alive after 18 months; however, only non-traditional CTCs were associated with overall survival. Traditional and total CTC counts according to the Epic platform in the mCRPC cohort were also significantly correlated with CTC counts according to the CellSearch system.

CONCLUSIONS

Heterogeneous non-traditional CTC populations are frequent in mCRPC and may provide additional prognostic or predictive information.

Intratumoural evolutionary landscape of high-risk prostate cancer: the PROGENY study of genomic and immune parameters

BACKGROUND

Intratumoural heterogeneity (ITH) is well recognised in prostate cancer (PC), but its role in high-risk disease is uncertain. A prospective, single-arm, translational study using targeted multiregion prostate biopsies was carried out to study genomic and T-cell ITH in clinically high-risk PC aiming to identify drivers and potential therapeutic strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-nine men with elevated prostate-specific antigen and multiparametric-magnetic resonance imaging detected PC underwent image-guided multiregion transperineal biopsy. Seventy-nine tumour regions from 25 patients with PC underwent sequencing, analysis of mutations, copy number and neoepitopes combined with tumour infiltrating T-cell subset quantification.

RESULTS

We demonstrated extensive somatic nucleotide variation and somatic copy number alteration heterogeneity in high-risk PC. Overall, the mutational burden was low (0.93/Megabase), but two patients had hypermutation, with loss of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, MSH2 and MSH6. Somatic copy number alteration burden was higher in patients with metastatic hormone-naive PC (mHNPC) than in those with high-risk localised PC (hrlPC), independent of Gleason grade. Mutations were rarely ubiquitous and mutational frequencies were similar for mHNPC and hrlPC patients. Enrichment of focal 3q26.2 and 3q21.3, regions containing putative metastasis drivers, was seen in mHNPC patients. We found evidence of parallel evolution with three separate clones containing activating mutations of β-catenin in a single patient. We demonstrated extensive intratumoural and intertumoural T-cell heterogeneity and high inflammatory infiltrate in the MMR-deficient (MMRD) patients and the patient with parallel evolution of β-catenin. Analysis of all patients with activating Wnt/β-catenin mutations demonstrated a low CD8+/FOXP3+ ratio, a potential surrogate marker of immune evasion.

CONCLUSIONS

The PROGENY (PROstate cancer GENomic heterogeneitY) study provides a diagnostic platform suitable for studying tumour ITH. Genetic aberrations in clinically high-risk PC are associated with altered patterns of immune infiltrate in tumours. Activating mutations of Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway or MMRD could be considered as potential biomarkers for immunomodulation therapies.

CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02022371.