A hybrid, low-cost tissue-like epidural needle insertion simulator

Epidural and spinal anesthesia are mostly performed "blind" without any medical imaging. Currently, training of these procedures is performed on human specimens, virtual reality systems, manikins and mostly in clinical practice supervised by a professional. In this study a novel hybrid, low-cost patient simulator for the training of needle insertion into the epidural space was designed. The patient phantom provides a realistic force feedback comparable with biological tissue and enables sensing of the needle tip position during insertion. A display delivers the trainee a real-time feedback of the needle tip position.

Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with advanced clear-cell sarcoma with MET alterations: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase II trial 90101 'CREATE'

Background

Clear-cell sarcoma (CCSA) is an orphan malignancy, characterized by a specific t(12;22) translocation, leading to rearrangement of the EWSR1 gene and overexpression of MET. We prospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic CCSA.

Patients and methods

Patients with CCSA received oral crizotinib 250 mg twice daily. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), secondary end points included duration of response, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), progression-free rate (PFR), overall survival (OS), OS rate and safety. The study design focused on MET+ disease with documented rearrangement of the EWSR1 gene by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Results

Among 43 consenting patients with the local diagnosis of CCSA, 36 had centrally confirmed CCSA, 28 of whom were eligible, treated and assessable. Twenty-six out of the 28 patients had MET+ disease, of whom one achieved a confirmed partial response and 17 had stable disease (SD) (ORR 3.8%, 95% confidence interval: 0.1-19.6). Further efficacy end points in MET+ CCSA were DCR: 69.2% (48.2% to 85.7%), median PFS: 131 days (49-235), median OS: 277 days (232-442). The 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-month PFR was 53.8% (34.6-73.0), 26.9% (9.8-43.9), 7.7% (1.3-21.7) and 7.7% (1.3-21.7), respectively. Among two assessable MET- patients, one had stable disease and one had progression. The most common treatment-related adverse events were nausea [18/34 (52.9%)], fatigue [17/34 (50.0%)], vomiting [12/34 (35.3%)], diarrhoea [11/34 (32.4%)], constipation [9/34 (26.5%)] and blurred vision [7/34 (20.6%)].

Conclusions

The PFS with crizotinib in MET+ CCSA is similar to results achieved first-line in non-selected metastatic soft tissue sarcomas with single-agent doxorubicin. The PFS is similar to results achieved with pazopanib in previously treated sarcoma patients.

Clinical trial number

EORTC 90101, EudraCT number 2011-001988-52, NCT01524926.

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in advanced renal cell carcinoma

Aims: Objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the role of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with respect to potential therapy with somatostatin analogue (SST-A) and to assess the response rate under therapy with SST-A. Patients, methods: 16 patients with documented progression of histologically confirmed advanced RCC were included. Planar whole-body SRS was performed 4, 24 and 48h post i.v. injection of 175–200 MBq 111In-pentetreoide. 5 and 25 h p.i. SPECT of thorax and abdomen were performed. Documentation of somatostatin receptor expression via SRS in >50% of known tumour lesions was the criteria for treatment start with SST-A (Sandostatin LAR®-Depot 30mg i.m. every four weeks). Results: In 9/16 of the patients SRS showed at least one metastasis with moderate (n = 5) or intense (n = 4) tracer uptake. Lesion-based SRS evaluation showed only 12.1% (20/165) of all metastases. Most false-negative lesions were located in the lungs. In two patients, the majority of the known metastases was SRS positive and these patients received SST-A therapy. The first radiographic evaluation after a twomonth interval showed progressive disease in both patients. Conclusions: We conclude that SRS is of limited value in staging of advanced RCC. In our patients SST-A did not result in a growth control of RCC. Consequently, the use of SST-A in advanced RCC seems to be no relevant therapeutic option.

A phase II study of a human anti-PDGFRα monoclonal antibody (olaratumab, IMC-3G3) in previously treated patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Background

This study evaluated tumor response to olaratumab (an anti-PDGFRα monoclonal antibody) in previously treated patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with or without PDGFRα mutations (cohorts 1 and 2, respectively).

Patients and methods

Patients received olaratumab 20 mg/kg intravenously every 14 days until disease progression, death, or intolerable toxicity occurred. Outcome measures were 12-week tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

Of 30 patients enrolled, 21 patients received ≥1 dose of olaratumab. In the evaluable population (cohort 1, n = 6; cohort 2, n = 14), no complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was observed. Stable disease (SD) was observed in 3 patients (50.0%) in cohort 1 and 2 patients (14.3%) in cohort 2. Progressive disease (PD) was observed in 3 patients (50.0%) in cohort 1 and 12 patients (85.7%) in cohort 2. The 12-week clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD) (90% CI) was 50.0% (15.3–84.7%) in cohort 1 and 14.3% (2.6–38.5%) in cohort 2. SD lasted beyond 12 weeks in 5 patients (cohort 1, n = 3; cohort 2, n = 2). Median PFS (90% CI) was 32.1 (5.0–35.9) weeks in cohort 1 and 6.1 (5.7–6.3) weeks in cohort 2. Median OS was not reached in cohort 1 and was 24.9 (14.4–49.1) weeks in cohort 2. All patients in cohort 1 and 9 (64.3%) in cohort 2 experienced an olaratumab-related adverse event (AE), most commonly fatigue (38.1%), nausea (19.0%), and peripheral edema (14.3%). Two grade ≥3 olaratumab-related events were reported (cohort 1, syncope; cohort 2, hypertension).

Conclusions

Olaratumab had an acceptable AE profile in patients with GIST. While there was no apparent effect on PFS in patients without PDGFRα mutations, patients with PDGFRα-mutant GIST (all with D842V mutations) treated with olaratumab had longer disease control compared with historical data for this genotype.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

NCT01316263.

Fully automated stroke tissue estimation using random forest classifiers (FASTER)

Several clinical trials have recently proven the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for treating ischemic stroke, within a six-hour window for therapy. To move beyond treatment windows and toward personalized risk assessment, it is essential to accurately identify the extent of tissue-at-risk ("penumbra"). We introduce a fully automated method to estimate the penumbra volume using multimodal MRI (diffusion-weighted imaging, a T2w- and T1w contrast-enhanced sequence, and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI). The method estimates tissue-at-risk by predicting tissue damage in the case of both persistent occlusion and of complete recanalization. When applied to 19 test cases with a thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grading of 1-2a, mean overestimation of final lesion volume was 30 ml, compared with 121 ml for manually corrected thresholding. Predicted tissue-at-risk volume was positively correlated with final lesion volume ( p < 0.05). We conclude that prediction of tissue damage in the event of either persistent occlusion or immediate and complete recanalization, from spatial features derived from MRI, provides a substantial improvement beyond predefined thresholds. It may serve as an alternative method for identifying tissue-at-risk that may aid in treatment selection in ischemic stroke.

[Isolated limb perfusion for liposarcoma : Histopathological response and subgroup analysis after TNF melphalan-based ILP]

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) and melphalan-based isolated limb perfusion (TM-ILP) is one of the most effective treatment modalities for unresectable soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities. Liposarcomas (LS) are a large and heterogeneous subgroup of STS with different biological behavior and prognoses. The aim of this study was to evaluate LS and the different subentities with respect to their responsiveness towards TM-ILP.

METHODS

We matched our ILP database with our pathology database to identify patients who received TM-ILP due to STS followed by resection of the residual tumor. We identified 126 patients who matched these inclusion criteria. In this patient group we identified 24 patients with a LS. Histopathological regression was assessed from all resection specimens and was compared between groups: LS vs. non-LS and for myxoid and non-myxoid LS subgroups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the overall tumor regression comparing non-LS (median 95%, mean 77%) and LS (median 90%, mean 74%). For the subgroup analysis, a higher grade of regression after TM-ILP was found in myxoid-LS (median 95%, mean 79% ± 31.5) compared to the non-myxoid LS (median 75%, mean 72% ± 24.6). Atypical lipomatous tumors (ALT) were less responsive to TM-ILP treatment (median 40%, mean 40%).

CONCLUSION

The histopathological response of LS toward TM-ILP is equally good compared to non-lipomatous STS. Myxoid LS seem to have a tendency towards a better response to TM-ILP compared to non-myxoid LS and ALT showed the lowest response rate in the liposarcoma subgroup. Furthermore, we found that TM-ILP seems to facilitate successful R0 resection. Due to the low number of cases in the subgroups we advocate further research on this topic.

[Plastic Surgery in Palliative Care - Report on the Consensus Workshop of the 37th Annual Meeting of the German-language Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM) 2016 in Bochum]

Introduction: At the consensus meeting on "Plastic Surgery in the Palliative Situation" at the 37th Annual Meeting of the DAM 2015 in Bochum, treatment options were discussed with oncologists and palliative care anesthesiologists and recommendations were given. Methods: The literature was reviewed and the results of the expert-meeting options and limits of therapy were illustrated. The role of plastic surgery for palliative care patients was pointed out and recommendations given for successful cooperative treatment. Results: A rational combination of chemotherapy and surgery as well as early integration into a palliative care concept prolongs survival and improves the quality of life of patients in the palliative situation. Discussion: Plastic surgeons should regularily attend tumour boards to spread the knowledge of the value of reconstructive procedures in multidisciplinary treatment, in order to enhance the quality of live of the palliative patient. Participation in the preparation of the next treatment guidelines for palliative care would be desirable. Whenever patients are considered in a palliative situation, palliative care anesthesiologists should be involved.