Pleural abnormalities in COVID-19: a narrative review

Objective

This narrative review aims to provide a detailed overview of pleural abnormalities in patients with coronavirus disease 19 or COVID-19.

Background

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) is a novel beta coronavirus responsible for COVID-19. Although pulmonary parenchymal and vascular changes associated with COVID-19 are well established, pleural space abnormalities have not been the primary focus of investigations.

Methods

Narrative overview of the medical literature regarding pleural space abnormalities in COVID-19. The appropriate manuscripts were identified by searching electronic medical databases and by hand searching the bibliography of the identified papers. Pleural abnormalities on transverse and ultrasound imaging are discussed. The incidence, clinical features, pathophysiology, and fluid characteristics of pleural effusion are reviewed. Studies reporting pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum are examined to evaluate for pathogenesis and prognosis. A brief comparative analysis of pleural abnormalities among patients with COVID-19, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome (MERS) has been provided.

Conclusions

Radiologic pleural abnormalities are common in COVID-19, but the incidence of pleural effusion appears to be low. Pneumothorax is rare and does not independently predispose the patient to worse outcomes. SARS-CoV-2 infects the pleural space; however, whether the pleural fluid can propagate the infection is unclear.

A 61-Year-Old Man With Influenza Pneumonia and New Onset Hemoptysis

A 61-year-old man presented to the ED with fever, chills, cough, purulent sputum, and progressive shortness of breath for 7 days. The patient was an active smoker with at least 80 pack-year smoking history. He had no other medical or surgical history and was not on any medication at home.

A 75-Year-Old Woman With Pulmonary Nodules and Dyspnea

CASE PRESENTATION

A 75-year-old woman was referred to the pulmonary office in January 2020 for cough and progressive worsening of shortness of breath over the years. Her medical history was significant for asthma that was diagnosed approximately 10 years earlier, when she first developed dyspnea. A pre-bronchodilator spirometry at that time showed severe airflow obstruction (Fig 1). The patient was incidentally found to have several noncalcified pulmonary nodules on a chest CT scan in 2015, which was obtained as a part of dyspnea workup. She underwent bronchoscopic evaluation with transbronchial biopsy of the largest nodule (1.6 × 1.2 cm) in the right middle lobe. She was diagnosed with low-grade neuroendocrine tumor (typical carcinoid) and had been under surveillance without any progression in the number of nodules or the size of the existing nodules. She was a lifelong nonsmoker and no family history of asthma. Over the years, she received multiple courses of systemic corticosteroids and different inhalers, without any improvement in her symptoms. The patient was frustrated by the lack of perceived benefit, and she discontinued all respiratory medications. She denied any fever, night sweats, exertional chest pain, or seasonal allergies but reported cough, wheezing, and severe exertional shortness of breath. She was unable to walk more than 20 feet at a time. She had no pets at home and did not travel outside the United States. Her only home medications were multivitamins and low-dose aspirin.

Idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis: a review of the treatments used during the past 30 years and future directions

This paper reviews the literature on the treatment modalities for idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis (IPH) used over the past 30 years, attempting to define treatment options that appear to be efficacious and safe, and in addition presents a treatment algorithm. IPH is an uncommon etiology of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. IPH is a rare disease in adults and often associated with a significant temporal delay in diagnosis. Patients present with hemoptysis, radiographic chest abnormalities, and iron deficiency anemia. Although several pathogenetic hypotheses have been proposed, IPH appears to be an immunologic disease, possibly with a genetic component. Corticosteroid therapy represents the first line of treatment, including liposome-incorporated dexamethasone palmitate (liposteroid). Additional immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive medications have been used with varying success, especially in the setting of steroid-refractory disease. Cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate mofetil, and mesenchymal cell transplantation have been attempted to improve outcome and reduce side effects. Controlled studies are needed to assess the optimal combination of medications, which are effective to control the disease.

Narrative review of the relationship between COVID-19 and PJP: does it represent coinfection or colonization?

Background

Pneumocystis jirovecii (P. jirovecii) is increasingly identified on lower respiratory tract specimens of COVID-19 patients. Our narrative review aims to determine whether the diagnosis of pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) in COVID-19 patients represents coinfection or colonization based on the evidence available in the literature. We also discuss the decision to treat COVID-19 patients with coinfection by PJP.

Methods

A literature search was performed through the Pubmed and Web of Science databases from inception to March 10, 2021.

Results

We identified 12 COVID-19 patients suspected to have PJP coinfection. All patients were critically ill and required mechanical ventilation. Many were immunosuppressed from HIV or long-term corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents. In both the HIV and non-HIV groups, severe lymphocytopenia was encountered with absolute lymphocyte and CD4+T cell count less than 900 and 200 cells/mm, respectively. The time to PJP diagnosis from the initial presentation was 7.8 (range 2–21) days. Serum lactate dehydrogenase and beta-D-glucan were elevated in those coinfected with PJP. All patients were treated with anti-PJP therapy, predominantly sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim with corticosteroids. The overall mortality rate was 41.6%, and comparable for both HIV and non-HIV groups.

Conclusion

As the current evidence is restricted to case reports, the true incidence, risk factors, and prognosis of COVID-19 patients with PJP coinfections cannot be accurately determined. Comorbidities of poorly controlled HIV with lymphocytopenia and multiple immunosuppressive therapies are likely predisposing factors for PJP coinfection.

Pneumothorax in critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection: Incidence, clinical characteristics and outcomes in a case control multicenter study

Background

The clinical features and outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 infection who develop a pneumothorax has not been rigorously described or compared to those who do not develop a pneumothorax.

Purpose

To determine the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection who developed pneumothorax. In addition, we compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients who developed a pneumothorax with those who did not develop a pneumothorax.

Methods

This study was a multicenter retrospective analysis of all adult critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection who were admitted to intensive care units in 4 tertiary care centers in the United States.

Results

A total of 842 critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection were analyzed, out of which 594 (71%) were mechanically ventilated. The overall incidence of pneumothorax was 85/842 (10%), and 80/594 (13%) in those who were mechanically ventilated. As compared to mechanically ventilated patients in the non-pneumothorax group, mechanically ventilated patients in the pneumothorax group had worse respiratory parameters at the time of intubation (mean PaO₂:FiO₂ ratio 105 vs 150, P<0.001 and static respiratory system compliance: 30ml/cmH₂O vs 39ml/cmH₂O, P = 0.01) and significantly higher in-hospital mortality (63% vs 49%, P = 0.04).

Conclusion

The overall incidence of pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 infection was 13%. Mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 infection who developed pneumothorax had worse gas exchange and respiratory mechanics at the time of intubation and had a higher mortality compared to those who did not develop pneumothorax.

The incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of pneumothorax in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A systematic review

Background

Pneumothorax has been frequently described as a complication of COVID-19 infections.

Objective

In this systematic review, we describe the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of COVID-19-related pneumothorax.

Methods

Studies were identified through MEDLINE, Pubmed, and Google Scholar databases using keywords of “COVID-19,” “SARS-CoV-2,” “pneumothorax,” “pneumomediastinum,” and “barotrauma” from January 1st, 2020 to January 30th, 2021.

Results

Among the nine observational studies, the incidence of pneumothorax is low at 0.3% in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. However, the incidence of pneumothorax increases to 12.8–23.8% in those requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) with a high mortality rate up to 100%. COVID-19-related pneumothorax tends to be unilateral and right-sided. Age, pre-existing lung diseases, and active smoking status are not shown to be risk factors. The time to pneumothorax diagnosis is around 9.0–19.6 days from admission and 5.4 days after IMV initiation. COVID-19-related pneumothoraces are associated with prolonged hospitalization, increased likelihood of ICU admission and death, especially among the elderly.

Conclusion

COVID-19-related pneumothorax likely signify greater disease severity. With the high variability of COVID-19-related pneumothorax incidence described, a well-designed study is required to better assess the significance of COVID-19-related pneumothorax.

Unilateral Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage Due to Selective Directionality of Mitral Regurgitant Jet in a Patient With Severe Aortic Stenosis

Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) in cardiac diseases results from pulmonary capillary stress failure due to pulmonary venous hypertension. The most common cardiac causes of DAH are heart failure and mitral valvular disease. Patients typically manifest with hemoptysis, radiologic chest abnormalities, and anemia. The chest infiltrates are generally bilateral, similar to pulmonary edema. Rarely, the chest infiltrates can be unilateral, mimicking an infectious etiology. We present the case of an 88-year-old female with critical aortic stenosis, who presented with shortness of breath, unilateral right lung infiltrates, and mild leukocytosis. The patient was misdiagnosed with pneumonia as pulmonary edema or DAH was expected to be a bilateral finding on chest imaging. The patient deteriorated and DAH was eventually diagnosed by bronchoscopy.

Comparing Central Venous Blood Gas to Arterial Blood Gas and Determining Its Utility in Critically Ill Patients: Narrative Review

Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis is used in critical care units to determine the degree of oxygenation, adequacy of ventilation, and the presence and severity of acid-base disturbances in the body. However, arterial puncture may result in complications, and the difficulty in acquiring arterial blood may delay care. Central venous blood gas (VBG) is a potentially more accessible alternative to ABG sampling. Current evidence suggests that pH and Pco2 obtained via peripheral VBG correlate well with ABG measurement. Nevertheless, the value of using central VBG to guide clinical decisions or as a surrogate for ABG is unclear. The purpose of this review is to explore the relationship between ABGs and central VBGs in critically ill patients. We performed a MEDLINE search using the following search terms: venous blood gas, arterial blood gas, and central venous blood gas. We excluded studies that did not involve human subjects, and only pH and Pco2 values were reviewed and examined from the studies included. All cited references from included studies were also reviewed to identify relevant literature. We identified 7 studies that met our criteria. In studies of hemodynamically stable patients, the mean difference between arterial and central venous pH and Pco2 was 0.03 units and 4-6.5 mm Hg, respectively. However, in patients with circulatory failure, the difference between central venous and arterial pH/Pco2 was 4-fold greater. We concluded that central VBG parameters of pH and Pco2 are potentially good surrogates for determining arterial pH and Pco2 in a stable patient without severe acid-base disturbances. Furthermore, central VBG can be used as a useful screening tool for arterial hypercapnia. In addition, we derived an adjustment formula for ABG conversion from central VBG: (1) arterial pH = venous pH + 0.05 units and (2) arterial Pco2 = venous Pco2 - 5 mm Hg.

State-of-the-art review of secondary pulmonary infections in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia

Background

The incidence of secondary pulmonary infections is not well described in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Understanding the incidence of secondary pulmonary infections and the associated bacterial and fungal microorganisms identified can improve patient outcomes.

Objective

This narrative review aims to determine the incidence of secondary bacterial and fungal pulmonary infections in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, and describe the bacterial and fungal microorganisms identified.

Method

We perform a literature search and select articles with confirmed diagnoses of secondary bacterial and fungal pulmonary infections that occur 48 h after admission, using respiratory tract cultures in hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients. We exclude articles involving co-infections defined as infections diagnosed at the time of admission by non-SARS-CoV-2 viruses, bacteria, and fungal microorganisms.

Results

The incidence of secondary pulmonary infections is low at 16% (4.8–42.8%) for bacterial infections and lower for fungal infections at 6.3% (0.9–33.3%) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Secondary pulmonary infections are predominantly seen in critically ill hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The most common bacterial microorganisms identified in the respiratory tract cultures are Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella species, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Aspergillus fumigatus is the most common microorganism identified to cause secondary fungal pulmonary infections. Other rare opportunistic infection reported such as PJP is mostly confined to small case series and case reports. The overall time to diagnose secondary bacterial and fungal pulmonary infections is 10 days (2–21 days) from initial hospitalization and 9 days (4–18 days) after ICU admission. The use of antibiotics is high at 60–100% involving the studies included in our review.

Conclusion

The widespread use of empirical antibiotics during the current pandemic may contribute to the development of multidrug-resistant microorganisms, and antimicrobial stewardship programs are required for minimizing and de-escalating antibiotics. Due to the variation in definition across most studies, a large, well-designed study is required to determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of secondary pulmonary infections in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

A 69-Year-Old Woman With Ulcerative Colitis and Pulmonary Nodules

CASE PRESENTATION

A 69-year-old woman with a medical history significant for COPD, ulcerative colitis (UC), and tobacco dependence was referred to a pulmonologist for lung nodules found on routine annual low-dose CT scan for lung cancer screening. Her review of systems was negative for dyspnea, angina, hemoptysis, fever, night sweats, anorexia, and weight loss. She had a successful total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed 5 years ago because of acute fulminant UC refractory to corticosteroids and biologic agents. Her home medications were albuterol inhaler, umeclidinium, and vilanterol inhalation powder. She denied any history of lung cancers in her family. She was an active smoker and had a 35-pack-year smoking history. She worked as a cashier in a local supermarket and had been doing so for the past 25 years.

Relationship Between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the Etiology of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Since it was first recognized in December 2019, it has resulted in the ongoing worldwide pandemic. Although acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are the main features of the disease, the involvement of other organs needs to be explored. There has been a growing concern regarding the association between acute kidney injury (AKI) and poor outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 patients. Based on current observational data, AKI is the 2nd most common cause of morbidity and mortality behind ARDS in SARS-CoV-2 patients. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor has been shown to be the cornerstone of SARS-CoV-2 infection and possibly plays a significant role in the occurrence of renal injury. The pathogenesis of AKI is likely multifactorial that involves not only direct viral invasion but also dysregulated immune response in the form of cytokine storm, ischemia to kidneys, hypercoagulable state, and rhabdomyolysis, among others. We performed a literature search of the Pubmed and Google Scholar database from 1996 to 2020 using the following keywords: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, coronavirus disease 2019, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor, and acute kidney injury to find the most pertinent and highest-quality of evidence. Any cited references were reviewed to identify relevant literature. The purpose of this review is to discuss, explore, and summarize the relationship between AKI in SARS-CoV-2 patients, with a focus on its epidemiology, association with ACE2 receptors, and pathophysiology of AKI.

The incidence of pleural effusion in COVID-19 pneumonia: State-of-the-art review

BACKGROUND

COVID-19-related pleural effusions are frequently described during the ongoing pandemic.

OBJECTIVES

We described the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of COVID-19-related pleural effusions based on the current evidence available in the literature.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Pubmed, and Google Scholar databases using keywords of "coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)," "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)," "pleural effusion," "pleural fluid," and "pleura" from January 1st, 2020 to January 31st, 2021.

RESULTS

The incidence of pleural effusions was low at 7.3% among the 47 observational studies. Pleural effusions were commonly observed in critically ill patients and had Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS). COVID-19-related pleural effusions were identified 5-7 days and 11 days, after hospital admission and onset of COVD-19 symptoms. The characteristic findings of pleural fluid were exudative, lymphocytic or neutrophilic-predominant pleural fluid with markedly elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and pleural fluid to serum LDH ratio.

CONCLUSION

A well-designed study is required to assess the significance of COVID-19-related pleural effusions during this current pandemic.

The Significance of Subpleural Sparing in CT Chest: A State-of-the-Art Review

The subpleural sparing pattern is a common finding on computed tomography (CT) of the lungs. It comprises of pulmonary opacities sparing the lung peripheries, typically 1cm and less from the pleural surface. This finding has a variety of causes, including idiopathic, inflammatory, infectious, inhalational, cardiac, traumatic, and bleeding disorders. Specific disorders that can cause subpleural sparing patterns include nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), organizing pneumonia (OP), pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP), diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH), vaping-associated lung injury (VALI), cracked lung, pulmonary edema, pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), pulmonary contusion, and more recently, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Knowledge of the many etiologies of this pattern can be useful in preventing diagnostic errors. In addition, although the etiology of subpleural sparing pattern is frequently indistinguishable during an initial radiologic evaluation, the differences in location of opacities in the lungs, as well as the presence of additional radiologic findings, patient history, and clinical presentation, can often be useful to suggest the appropriate diagnosis. We did a comprehensive search on Pubmed and Google Scholar database using keywords of "subpleural sparing," "peripheral sparing," "sparing of peripheries," "CT chest," "chest imaging," and "pulmonary disease." This review aims to describe the primary differential diagnosis of subpleural sparing pattern seen on chest imaging with a strong emphasis on clinical and radiographic findings. We also discuss the pathogenesis and essential clues that are crucial to narrow the differential diagnosis.

Idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis: A state of the art review

Idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis (IPH) is an uncommon cause of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH). Patients with IPH usually present with hemoptysis, and the diagnosis is often delayed by years. Patients often present with intermittent episodes of hemoptysis interspersed between periods of relative normalcy. However, massive hemorrhage resulting in acute respiratory failure and non-remitting hemoptysis have also been described. The classic triad includes hemoptysis, radiologic lung infiltrate, and iron deficiency anemia. Several hypotheses regarding the pathogenesis of IPH have been proposed. These risk factors include an autoimmune, allergic or genetic predisposition, and possible environmental exposure. Since IPH appears to be responsive to corticosteroids, the autoimmune hypothesis is considered to play a crucial role. A diagnosis of IPH requires exclusion of other etiologies of DAH, including infection, medications, toxic inhalation, vasculitis, and anti-glomerular basement membrane disease, among others. Histologically, IPH is characterized by the presence of hemosiderin-laden macrophages in the alveolar space without any evidence of vasculitis or immunocomplex deposition. Corticosteroid therapy represents the primary modality of treatment. Other immunosuppressive medications have also been used with varying success, especially in the setting of steroid-refractory disease. The prognosis of IPH in adults is somewhat better compared to the pediatric population. The severity of the initial presentation does not predict future outcomes. Which risk factors and patient characteristics are associated with a poor outcome are also unknown. More research is necessary to elucidate the pathophysiology and appropriate treatment.

Rapid reversal of vasoplegia with methylene blue in calcium channel blocker poisoning

INTRODUCTION

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are a potent class of medications that exert its action by blocking 'L-type' calcium channels. CCB overdose can be fatal even with appropriate and aggressive therapy. Death ensues from heart block, myocardial suppression, vasoplegia, and shock. Early use of methylene blue (MB) might provide additional means to improve outcomes.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 25-year-old female presented after an attempted suicide. The patient ingested a substantial amount of diltiazem, promethazine, and trazodone. Seven hours following the ingestion, she became profoundly vasoplegic and hypotensive. Despite guideline-based therapy and high doses of vasopressors, she suffered from worsening lactic acidosis and multiorgan failure. Administration of an intravenous bolus dose of MB resulted in a rapid and sustained improvement of vasoplegia, and the patient subsequently went on to make a complete recovery.

DISCUSSION

In addition to calcium channel blockade, CCBs cause vascular smooth muscle relaxation by the production of nitric oxide (NO). In cases of overdose, NO production can be significant. MB is a safe and inexpensive medication with the potential to reverse NO-mediated vasoplegia that is responsible for CCB induced shock state. In parts of the world where access to advanced medical care is not readily available, early use of MB might have a significant role in the management of CCB overdose.

A 65-year-old Woman With Persistent Dyspnea, Arthritis, and Raynaud's Phenomenon

Antisynthetase syndrome (AS) is a rare disease that affects patients with inflammatory myopathies such as polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM). In patients with AS, up to 95% of patients develop antisynthetase syndrome-associated interstitial lung disease (AS-ILD). Although AS-ILD commonly occurs in patients with a well-established diagnosis of AS, it can be the first or only manifestation of an occult AS. The frequency of interstitial lung disease (ILD), myopathy, and skin involvement are often dependent on the type of myositis-specific antibodies present. AS-ILD patients who are positive for both anti-Jo-1 and anti-SSA/RO-52 autoantibodies often present with a severe degree of lung restriction on pulmonary function tests and radiologic imaging with an inadequate response toward immunosuppressive therapies. We describe a 65-year-old woman who presents with chronic dyspnea. She was initially diagnosed with corticosteroid-resistant cryptogenic organizing pneumonia based on the radiological findings on her CT chest. Her symptoms did not improve, and she suffered from intolerable corticosteroid-related side effects. Reviews of systems were positive for arthritis and Raynaud's phenomenon. She was found to have elevated inflammatory markers and autoantibodies such as anti-Jo-1, anti-RO-52, and anti-SSA. A diagnosis of AS-ILD resistant to corticosteroid therapy was made. Her lung function improved with combination therapy of mycophenolate and rituximab. Our case highlights that a detailed history and physical exam, compatible radiologic imaging, and autoantibodies are essential for the diagnosis of AS-ILD.

Trimethoprim-induced hyponatremia mimicking SIADH in a patient with pulmonary nocardiosis: use of point-of-care ultrasound in apparent euvolemic hypotonic hyponatremia

A 72-year-old man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and depression presented to the emergency department (ED) with progressive worsening of shortness of breath. He required intubation and mechanical ventilation. The patient improved with therapy, but his endotracheal aspirate culture was positive for Nocardia cyriacigeorgica The patient was started on high dose Bactrim and discharged. He presented to the office 5 days later with confusion, and his serum sodium was 113 mmol/L. Based on a euvolemic physical examination, consistent serum and urine studies, he was diagnosed with syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) likely from citalopram. However, treatment for SIADH failed to improve his serum sodium level. A bedside ultrasound revealed an inferior vena cava diameter of 0.7 cm with a complete inspiratory collapse that was inconsistent with SIADH. The patient was correctly diagnosed with salt-losing nephropathy from trimethoprim, and the medication was discontinued. He received therapy initially with intravenous normal saline and then salt tablets. His sodium improved within 2 weeks.