Smell and taste recovery in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a 60-day objective and prospective study

BACKGROUND

The long-term recovery rate of chemosensitive functions in coronavirus disease 2019 patients has not yet been determined.

METHOD

A multicentre prospective study on 138 coronavirus disease 2019 patients was conducted. Olfactory and gustatory functions were prospectively evaluated for 60 days.

RESULTS

Within the first 4 days of coronavirus disease 2019, 84.8 per cent of patients had chemosensitive dysfunction that gradually improved over the observation period. The most significant increase in chemosensitive scores occurred in the first 10 days for taste and between 10 and 20 days for smell. At the end of the observation period (60 days after symptom onset), 7.2 per cent of the patients still had severe dysfunctions. The risk of developing a long-lasting disorder becomes significant at 10 days for taste (odds ratio = 40.2, 95 per cent confidence interval = 2.204-733.2, p = 0.013) and 20 days for smell (odds ratio = 58.5, 95 per cent confidence interval = 3.278-1043.5, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Chemosensitive disturbances persisted in 7.2 per cent of patients 60 days after clinical onset. Specific therapies should be initiated in patients with severe olfactory and gustatory disturbances 20 days after disease onset.

Isolated sudden onset anosmia in COVID-19 infection. A novel syndrome?

BACKGROUND

The amelioration of the current COVID pandemic relies on swift and efficient case finding as well as stringent social distancing measures. Current advice suggests that fever or new onset dry cough are the commonest presenting complaints.

METHODOLOGY

We present a case report and case series as well as other evidence that there is an important fourth presenting syndrome, namely isolated sudden onset anosmia (ISOA), which should be considered highly suspicious for SARS-CoV-2.

RESULTS

A patient presenting with ISOA who went on to test positive for infection with COVID-19 and did not develop any further symptoms as well as a case series of similar patients although limited by the lack of reliable testing at the moment.

CONCLUSIONS

We posit the existence of a fourth common syndrome of COVID-19 infection: isolated sudden onset anosmia (ISOA) and urge the international community to consider this presentation in current management advice.

Personal protection and delivery of rhinologic and endoscopic skull base procedures during the COVID-19 outbreak

On March 11th 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 pandemic, with subsequent profound impact on the entire health care system. During the COVID-19 outbreak, activities in the rhinology outpatient clinic and operation rooms are limited to emergency care only. Health care practitioners are faced with the need to perform rhinological and skull base emergency procedures in patients with a positive or unknown COVID-19 status. This article aims to provide recommendations and relevant information for rhinologists, based on the limited amount of (anecdotal) data, to guarantee high-quality patient care and adequate levels of infection prevention in the rhinology clinic.

Presentation of new onset anosmia during the COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCTION

Anosmia has not been formally recognised as a symptom of COVID-19 infection. Growing anecdotal evidence suggests increasing incidence of cases of anosmia during the current pandemic, suggesting that COVID-19 may cause olfactory dysfunction. The objective was to characterise patients reporting new onset anosmia during the COVID-19 pandemic METHODOLOGY: Design: Survey of 2428 patients reporting new onset anosmia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

SETTING

Volunteer sample of patients seeking medical advice of recent onset self-diagnosed loss of sense of smell RESULTS: 2428 surveys were completed within 7 days; 64% respondents were under 40. The majority of respondents reported onset of their anosmia in the last week. Of the cohort, 17% did not report any other symptom thought to be associated with COVID-19. In patients who reported other symptoms, 51% reported either cough or fever and therefore met current guidelines for self-isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

Anosmia is reported in conjunction with well-reported symptoms of coronas virus, but 1 in 6 patients with recent onset anosmia report this as an isolated symptom. This might help identify otherwise asymptomatic carriers of disease and trigger targeted testing. Further study with COVID-19 testing is required to identify the proportion of patients in whom new onset anosmia can be attributed to COVID-19.

Executive summary of EPOS 2020 including integrated care pathways

The European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020 is the update of similar evidence based position papers published in 2005 and 2007 and 2012(1-3). The core objective of the EPOS2020 guideline is to provide revised, up-to-date and clear evidence-based recommendations and integrated care pathways in ARS and CRS. EPOS2020 provides an update on the literature published and studies undertaken in the eight years since the EPOS2012 position paper was published and addresses areas not extensively covered in EPOS2012 such as paediatric CRS and sinus surgery. EPOS2020 also involves new stakeholders, including pharmacists and patients, and addresses new target users who have become more involved in the management and treatment of rhinosinusitis since the publication of the last EPOS document, including pharmacists, nurses, specialised care givers and indeed patients themselves, who employ increasing self-management of their condition using over the counter treatments. The document provides suggestions for future research in this area and offers updated guidance for definitions and outcome measurements in research in different settings.

European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020

The European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020 is the update of similar evidence based position papers published in 2005 and 2007 and 2012. The core objective of the EPOS2020 guideline is to provide revised, up-to-date and clear evidence-based recommendations and integrated care pathways in ARS and CRS. EPOS2020 provides an update on the literature published and studies undertaken in the eight years since the EPOS2012 position paper was published and addresses areas not extensively covered in EPOS2012 such as paediatric CRS and sinus surgery. EPOS2020 also involves new stakeholders, including pharmacists and patients, and addresses new target users who have become more involved in the management and treatment of rhinosinusitis since the publication of the last EPOS document, including pharmacists, nurses, specialised care givers and indeed patients themselves, who employ increasing self-management of their condition using over the counter treatments. The document provides suggestions for future research in this area and offers updated guidance for definitions and outcome measurements in research in different settings. EPOS2020 contains chapters on definitions and classification where we have defined a large number of terms and indicated preferred terms. A new classification of CRS into primary and secondary CRS and further division into localized and diffuse disease, based on anatomic distribution is proposed. There are extensive chapters on epidemiology and predisposing factors, inflammatory mechanisms, (differential) diagnosis of facial pain, allergic rhinitis, genetics, cystic fibrosis, aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease, immunodeficiencies, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis and the relationship between upper and lower airways. The chapters on paediatric acute and chronic rhinosinusitis are totally rewritten. All available evidence for the management of acute rhinosinusitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps in adults and children is systematically reviewed and integrated care pathways based on the evidence are proposed. Despite considerable increases in the amount of quality publications in recent years, a large number of practical clinical questions remain. It was agreed that the best way to address these was to conduct a Delphi exercise . The results have been integrated into the respective sections. Last but not least, advice for patients and pharmacists and a new list of research needs are included. The full document can be downloaded for free on the website of this journal: http://www.rhinologyjournal.com.

Antibiotic usage in chronic rhinosinusitis: analysis of national primary care electronic health records

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyse rates of antibiotic usage in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in primary care in England and Wales and to identify trends in the choice of antibiotics prescribed.

METHODS

We used linked data from primary care EHRs, with diagnoses coded using the Read terminology (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) from consenting general practices, with (2) hospital care administrative records (Hospital Episode Statistics, HES recorded using ICD-10).

RESULTS

From the total of 88,317 cases of CRS identified, 40,462 (46%) had an antibiotic prescription within 5 days of their first CRS diagnosis. Of patients receiving a first line antibiotic within 5 days of CRS diagnosis, over 80%, in each CRS group, received a subsequent prescription for an antibiotic. Within 5 years of diagnosis, 9% are estimated to have had 5 or more antibiotics within 5 days of a CRS-related consultation. With data spanning almost 20 years, it was possible to discern trends in antibiotics prescriptions, with a clear increasing trend towards macrolide and tetracycline prescribing evident.

CONCLUSIONS

While antibiotics may have been prescribed for acute exacerbations, we have found high rates of repeated antibiotic prescription in some patients with CRS in primary care. There is a need for stronger evidence on the role of antibiotics in CRS management.

Patient Advisory Board for Chronic Rhinosinusitis - A EUFOREA initiative

Despite the high prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and its impact on patients' quality of life, no European patient organization that advocates for patients with CRS currently exists. To fill this gap and give a voice to CRS patients, EUFOREA has created a patient advisory board, whose goal is to better understand the real-life needs of patients, to raise awareness at political level and to involve patients in the development of novel integrated solutions to accelerate access to accurate diagnosis and treatments. This report summarizes the key discussion points from the kick-off meeting of the board on the 8th June 2018 and provides an outline of the key objectives for the future.

Optimising trial outcomes and patient retention for the MACRO trial for chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate current subjective and objective outcome assessments for the MACRO (defining best Management for Adults with Chronic RhinOsinusitis) Trial which compares antibiotics, placebo and sinus surgery. This was to identify any redundant assessments and to include patient perspectives to determine acceptability for confirmation in the trial.

METHODS

Adults CRS patients meeting the provisional eligibility criteria for the MACRO trial were recruited to this mixed-method study at 2 sites. Correlations between the objective outcome measures and SNOT-22 scores were evaluated. Selected participants took part in a semi-structured telephone interview to explore their experiences and views of undergoing outcome measures.

RESULTS

Seventy patients (37% male) were recruited, 36 had CRS without nasal polyps, 34 had CRS with nasal polyps. There was a weak inverse correlation between the SNOT-22 â€Blockage†ratings and Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow readings, a moderate inverse correlation between the SNOT-22 â€Smell†ratings and Sniffin’ Sticks scores, but no significant correlation between the SNOT-22 and Saccharin test results. The participants’ experience of the trial visit was positive with an acceptable duration of trial visit. Most proposed outcome measures were valued by participants with the exception of the Saccharin test.

DISCUSSION

The Sniffin’ Sticks test and PNIF correlate with their respective component SNOT-22 scores but are considered important by patients; PNIF is simple, cheap test to perform. The Saccharin test will be removed as participants did not value it and was not highly rated in parallel work on a core outcome set for CRS.

Exploring the association between ingestion of foods with higher potential salicylate content and symptom exacerbation in chronic rhinosinusitis. Data from the National Chronic Rhinosinusitis Epidemiology Study

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacological salicylates are known to trigger respiratory exacerbations in patients with Non-Steroidal Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (N-ERD), a specific phenotype of Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) and asthma. The impact of dietary sources of salicylates across subgroups of CRS is not well understood. The hypothesis is that in patients with nasal polyps present, there is likely to be a higher incidence of symptom exacerbation due to dietary salicylates regardless of any known response to pharmacological salicylate.

METHODS

The Chronic Rhinosinusitis Epidemiology Study (CRES) was a questionnaire-based case-control study which sought to characterise the UK CRS population in terms of sociological, economic and medical factors. Using specific questions to examine participant responses relating to symptom exacerbation from food groups thought to be high in salicylate content, this analysis of the CRES database sought to compare an estimate of the prevalence of dietary sensitivity due to food with higher potential salicylate content across patients with CRS with (CRSwNPs) and without nasal polyposis (CRSsNPs) and with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS).

RESULTS

The CRSwNPs group were significantly more likely than controls to report symptom exacerbation due to ingestion of food groups with higher potential dietary salicylate content. The same trend was observed amongst CRSsNPs participants to a lesser degree. Reported response to the individual specific food groups wine, nuts, spicy foods, fruit and vegetables demonstrated that a statistically significant proportion of CRSwNPs and AFRS participants reported sensitivity to wine.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that there is an association between symptom exacerbation in response to food products with higher potential salicylate content, specifically wine, in CRS patients both with and without nasal polyposis when compared to controls, but especially in the CRSwNPs and AFRS phenotypes. Further studies are needed to detail if this relationship represents a causal relationship to dietary salicylate. The data present the possibility that a wider group of CRS patients may elicit salicylate sensitivity than those with known N-ERD.

Risk of mortality and cardiovascular events following macrolide prescription in chronic rhinosinusitis patients: a cohort study using linked primary care electronic health records

BACKGROUND

Macrolide antibiotics have demonstrated important anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients. However, reports of increased risks of cardiovascular events have led to safety concerns. We investigated the risk of all-cause and cardiac death, and cardiovascular outcomes, associated with macrolide use.

METHODOLOGY

Observational cohort (1997-2016) using linked data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Hospital Episodes Statistics, and the Office for National Statistics. Patients aged 16-80 years with CRS prescribed a macrolide antibiotic or penicillin were included, comparing prescriptions for macrolide antibiotics to penicillin. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease, and cardiac arrhythmia.

RESULTS

Analysis included 320,798 prescriptions received by 66,331 patients. There were 3,251 deaths, 815 due to cardiovascular causes, 925 incident myocardial infarctions, 859 strokes, 637 diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease, and 1,436 cardiac arrhythmias. A non-statistically significant trend towards increased risk of myocardial infarction during the first 30 days following macrolide prescription was observed. No statistically significant short- or long-term risks were observed for macrolide prescription. No significant risks were identified for clarithromycin in particular.

CONCLUSIONS

Although not statistically significant, our best estimates suggest an increased short-term risk of myocardial infarction in patients with CRS following macrolide prescription, supporting previous observational evidence. However, confounding by indication remains a possible explanation for this apparent increased risk. We found no evidence of longer term increased risks.

European position paper on diagnostic tools in rhinology

The accurate diagnosis of rhinologic disease depends on the clinical history, examination findings and, in many cases, further investigations. There are a wide variety of diagnostic tests available, the choice of which depends upon the condition being assessed. This position paper is intended to provide an up-to-date comprehensive description of the diagnostic tools available to rhinologists, allergists, general otolaryngologists and other physicians with an interest in sinonasal disease. The literature has been reviewed and evidence-based recommendations are included. The relevant history and examination techniques are described, including endoscopic assessment of the nose. General and disease-specific quality of life instruments are an important tool in assessing the impact of rhinologic disease and the response to treatment. Relevant blood tests are discussed, as well as the various methods of allergy testing. Techniques for collecting microbiological and tissue samples are described, as well as the use of more specialised tests such as nasal nitric oxide and those evaluating ciliary structure and function. Imaging techniques and their indications are included. Chemosensory (smell and taste) testing is explained, and the available techniques for objective measurement of nasal airflow and patency are reviewed. Prompt and accurate diagnosis allows appropriate management to be initiated; an understanding of the currently available diagnostic tools is a vital part of the assessment of rhinologic disease.

Prevention of chronic rhinosinusitis

Prevention of chronicity of disease and minimising its impact with individualized treatment is a fundamental tenet of precision medicine. A review of the literature has been undertaken to explore how this may apply to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Prevention may be thought of across 3 main domains. Primary prevention of CRS focuses on the avoidance of exposure to environmental factors associated with increased incidence of disease. This includes avoidance of tobacco smoke and occupational toxins. Although allergic rhinitis, respiratory infections and gastro-oesophageal reflux have been shown to be risk factors, there is no evidence as yet that treatment of these conditions is associated with reduced incidence of CRS. Secondary prevention of CRS is concerned with detecting a disease in its earliest stages, intervening to achieve disease and symptom control and preventing future exacerbations. Evidence based guidelines facilitate early diagnosis and appropriate use of medical and surgical interventions. In the future the use of endotypes to direct optimal is like to allow more clinically and cost-effective use of current and emerging treatments, such as monoclonal antibodies. Tertiary prevention aims to minimise the impact of an ongoing illness or injury that has lasting effects. Anxiety and depression have been shown to be associated with symptom amplification and may require treatment. The role of disease-related factors such as the role of the microbiome and osteo-neogenesis in the development of chronicity, and the development of severe combined upper airway disease needs further research.

mySinusitisCoach: patient empowerment in chronic rhinosinusitis using mobile technology

Mobile health technology is emerging to take a prominent position in the management of chronic diseases. These technologies aim at enhancing patient empowerment via education and self-management. To date, of all the different apps available for patients with sinus disease, none were developed by medical experts dealing with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway diseases (EUFOREA) has undertaken a multi-stakeholder approach for designing, developing and implementing a tool to support CRS patients in monitoring their symptoms and to provide patients with a digital support platform containing reliable medical information about their disease and treatment options. mySinusitisCoach has been developed by medical experts dealing with CRS in close collaboration with patients, primary care physicians and community pharmacists, meeting the needs of both patients and health care providers. From a research perspective, the generation of real life data will help to validate clinical studies, patient stratification and improve understanding of the socio-economic impact of CRS, thereby paving the way for better treatment strategies.

Role of local anaesthetic nerve block in endoscopic sinus surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review of existing evidence on the role of local anaesthetic nerve block (LAB) in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).

DESIGN

The databases searched were the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and Embase using the Ovid portal (1946-2017).

RESULTS

Seven randomised controlled trials were included. Due to considerable heterogeneity of data, only two studies were pooled into meta-analysis which demonstrated a statistically significantly better surgical field quality during ESS in the LAB group compared with the control group (MD -0.86; 95% CI -2.24, 0.51; P = .009). No adverse events related to LAB toxicity were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Sphenopalatine ganglion LAB with adrenaline carries relatively low risk of morbidity, but may improve the quality of the surgical field in terms of bleeding. However, there are limitations of the study due to heterogeneity of methods, quality and size of the studies. Well-conducted large RCTs are needed using standardised inclusion criteria, balanced baseline characteristics of cohorts, and validated subjective and objective outcome measures.