Early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: radiotherapy vs. trans-oral robotic surgery (ORATOR)--study protocol for a randomized phase II trial

Background

The incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has markedly increased over the last three decades due to newly found associations with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Primary radiotherapy (RT) is the treatment of choice for OPSCC at most centers, and over the last decade, the addition of concurrent chemotherapy has led to a significant improvement in survival, but at the cost of increased acute and late toxicity. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has emerged as a promising alternative treatment, with preliminary case series demonstrating encouraging oncologic, functional, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes. However, comparisons of TORS and RT in a non-randomized fashion are susceptible to bias. The goal of this randomized phase II study is to compare QOL, functional outcomes, toxicity profiles, and survival following primary RT (± chemotherapy) vs. TORS (± adjuvant [chemo] RT) in patients with OPSCC.

Methods/Design

The target patient population comprises OPSCC patients who would be unlikely to require chemotherapy post-resection: Tumor stage T1-T2 with likely negative margins at surgery; Nodal stage N0-2, ≤3 cm in size, with no evidence of extranodal extension on imaging. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between Arm 1 (RT ± chemotherapy) and Arm 2 (TORS ± adjuvant [chemo] RT). In Arm 1, patients with N0 disease will receive RT alone, whereas N1-2 patients will receive concurrent chemoradiation. In Arm 2, patients will undergo TORS along with selective neck dissections, which may be staged. Pathologic high-risk features will be used to determine the requirement for adjuvant radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is QOL score using the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), with secondary endpoints including survival, toxicity, other QOL outcomes, and swallowing function. A sample of 68 patients is required.

Discussion

This study, if successful, will provide a much-needed randomized comparison of the conventional strategy of primary RT vs. the novel strategy of primary TORS. The trial is designed to provide a definitive QOL comparison between the two arms, and to inform the design of an eventual phase III trial for survival outcomes.

Trial registration

NCT01590355

Consolidative high-dose chemotherapy after conventional-dose chemotherapy as first salvage treatment for male patients with metastatic germ cell tumours

Collapse

Consolidative high-dose chemotherapy after conventional-dose chemotherapy as first salvage treatment for male patients with metastatic germ cell tumours

INTRODUCTION

Some men with metastatic germ cell tumours that have progressed after response to initial cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy are cured with conventional dose first salvage chemotherapy (CDCT)--however, many are not. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue (HDCT) may be of value in these patients. Prognosis has recently been better defined by International Prognostic Factor Study Group (IPFSG) prognostic factors. HDCT after response to CDCT has been offered at our institution over the past two decades. We retrospectively assessed the validity of the IPFSG prognostic factors in our patients and evaluated the value of HDCT.

METHODS

We identified eligible men with metastatic germ cell tumour progressed after at least 3 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and treated with cisplatin-based CDCT alone or with carboplatin-based HDCT. We also collected their clinical data. Patients were classified into risk groups using IPFSG factors, and progression-free and overall survival factors were analyzed and compared in patients treated with CDCT alone and with HDCT.

RESULTS

We identified 38 eligible first salvage patients who had received a median of 4 cycles (range, 1 to 7 cycles) of CDCT. Twenty patients received CDCT alone and 18 patients received CDCT plus HDCT. The overall median progression- free survival was 24.6 months (95%CI, 7.3 to 28.7 months) and overall median overall survival was 34.6 months (95%CI, 17.2 to 51.3 months). Distribution by IPFSG category and 2-year progression- free survival and 3-year overall survival rates within each risk category were very similar to the IPFSG results. There were two toxic deaths with CDCT and none with HDCT. Overall, patients treated with CDCT plus HDCT had improved progression- free survival and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The IPFSG prognostic risk factors appeared valid in our patient population. The safety of HDCT with etoposide and carboplatin was confirmed. HDCT was associated with improved progression- free survival and overall survival outcomes, consistent with observations of the IPFSG group. Ideally, the value of optimal HDCT should be determined in comparison to optimal CDCT as first salvage therapy in men with metastatic germ cell tumour with a randomized trial.

A phase II, multicenter, open-label study of YM155 plus docetaxel in subjects with stage III (unresectable) or stage IV melanoma

8587

Background: Survivin is a microtubule-associated protein implicated in both preservation of cell viability and regulation of mitosis in tumor cells. It is over-expressed in melanoma, breast, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. YM155 is a first in class survivin inhibitor. Methods: The study had 2 parts: Part 1 established the dose of docetaxel that was tolerable in combination withYM155 at 5 mg/m2/day continuous infusion over 168 hours q 3 weeks. Part 2 utilized the dose of docetaxel established in Part 1 to further evaluate the tolerability and activity of the combination. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate, 1-year overall survival (OS), time from first response to progression, clinical benefit rate, time to response, and safety. Results: 64 patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with docetaxel followed by continuous infusion YM155. 7 patients were treated with 100mg/m2 of docetaxel and 57 patients were treated with 75mg/m2 of docetaxel. Median age was 59, with 44 men and 20 women treated. 6-month PFS per Independent Review Committee (IRC) was 34.8% (95% CI 21.3 – 48.6%). Overall objective response rate per IRC was 12.5%, with no complete responses (CR) and 8 patients with partial responses (PR). The Stable disease (SD) rate was 51.6%, leading to a clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD) of 64.1%. Estimated 1-year overall survival is 50.5%. 87.5% of patients experienced a Grade 3 (G3) or Grade 4 (G4) event attributable to either YM155 or docetaxel. The clinically pertinent G3 or 4 toxicities occurring in greater than 5% of patients treated included neutropenia (59.4%), febrile neutropenia (12.5%), mucositis (9.4%), fatigue (7.8%), diarrhea (6.3%), and dehydration (6.3%). There were 3 deaths on study, all attributable to disease progression. Conclusions: YM155 is a novel agent that shows modest activity when combined with docetaxel in patients with melanoma. YM155 was generally well tolerated, but the pre-determined primary endpoint for efficacy was not achieved.

Consolidative high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) after conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) as first salvage treatment for male patients (pts) with metastatic germ cell tumors (mGCTs)

336

Background: Some men with mGCTs progressing after response to initial cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy are cured with CDCT as 1st salvage, however, many are not. Prognosis has recently been better defined by the IPFSG prognostic factors. HDCT with autologous stem cell rescue has been routinely offered after CR/PRm- remission with CDCT at our institution over the past two decades. We retrospectively reviewed our data to assess the validity of the IPFSG prognostic factors and evaluate the potential value of this approach.

Methods: Eligible men with mGCTs progressing after at least 3 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy received after 01 Jan 1990 and treated with cisplatin-based CDCT+/−HDCT (etoposide + carboplatin) were identified and data collected. Pts were classified into risk groups using IPFSG factors, PFS and OS were analyzed and results for CDCT+/−HDCT compared.

Results: 38 eligible 1st salvage pts had received a median of 4 cycles (range, 1–7) of CDCT. 20 pts received CDCT alone & 18 pts received CDCT+HDCT. Overall median PFS was 24.6 months (95%CI, 7.3–28.7) and overall median OS was 34.6 months (95%CI, 17.2–51.3). Distribution by IPFSG category, 2-year PFS and 3-year OS rates within each risk category were very similar to IPFSG results. Two toxic deaths occurred with CDCT. Pts treated with CDCT+HDCT more often had better responses to 1st-line chemotherapy and pure seminoma histology. Overall pts treated with CDCT+HDCT had improved PFS (HR: 0.18; 95%CI, 0.07–0.51; p=0.001) and OS (HR: 0.25; 95%CI, 0.10–0.65; p=0.004) compared to CDCT alone. Examination by IPFSG risk category showed that the 2-year PFS and 3-year OS rates for CDCT+HDCT was higher in all prognostic groups except for the very high risk which did not have any HDCT pts.

Conclusions: The IPFSG prognostic factors were valid in our 1st salvage mGCT pts. The safety of HDCT with etoposide and carboplatin was confirmed. HDCT was associated with improved PFS and OS outcomes, consistent with observations of Lorch et al (JCO 2011). Ideally the value of optimal CDCT+HDCT should be determined in comparison to optimal CDCT as first salvage therapy in men with metastatic GCT in a randomized trial.

Quality of life 2 years after salvage cryosurgery for the treatment of local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Previous research has raised concerns that although salvage cryosurgery may be an effective treatment to prevent the progression of prostate cancer after radiotherapy failure, the quality of life cost many be so severe as to prevent its acceptance as a viable treatment. The present study's purpose was to further the understanding of the quality of life outcomes of salvage cryosurgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 46 men with locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy were recruited to participate in a prospective Phase II clinical trial using salvage cryosurgery. There were 2 questionnaires (i.e., the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30 and the Prostate Cancer Index) administered before cryosurgery, and at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Quality of life returned to preoperative levels by 24 months after cryosurgery in all domains, with the exception of urinary and sexual functioning. At 24 months, 29% of men reported urinary bother as a moderate-to-big problem, and 56% reported sexual bother as a moderate-to-big problem.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate prospectively men's quality of life for 2 years after salvage cryosurgery for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Long-term impairments in quality of life appear to be limited to the sexual and urinary function domains. Overall quality of life appears to be high. These results support salvage cryosurgery as a viable treatment option.

Non-hormonal systemic therapy in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and metastases: a systematic review from the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-based Care's Genitourinary Cancer Disease Site Group

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer that has recurred after local therapy or disseminated distantly is usually treated with androgen deprivation therapy; however, most men will eventually experience disease progression within 12 to 20 months. New data emerging from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of chemotherapy provided the impetus for a systematic review addressing the following question: which non-hormonal systemic therapies are most beneficial for the treatment of men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) and clinical evidence of metastases?

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify RCTs or meta-analyses examining first-line non-hormonal systemic (cytotoxic and non-cytotoxic) therapy in patients with HRPC and metastases that reported at least one of the following endpoints: overall survival, disease control, palliative response, quality of life, and toxicity. Excluded were RCTs of second-line hormonal therapies, bisphosphonates or radiopharmaceuticals, or randomized fewer than 50 patients per trial arm. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology were searched for relevant trials. Citations were screened for eligibility by four reviewers and discrepancies were handled by consensus.

RESULTS

Of the 80 RCTs identified, 27 met the eligibility criteria. Two recent, large trials reported improved overall survival with docetaxel-based chemotherapy compared to mitoxantrone-prednisone. Improved progression-free survival and rates of palliative and objective response were also observed. Compared with mitoxantrone, docetaxel treatment was associated with more frequent mild toxicities, similar rates of serious toxicities, and better quality of life. More frequent serious toxicities were observed when docetaxel was combined with estramustine. Three trials reported improved time-to-disease progression, palliative response, and/or quality of life with mitoxatrone plus corticosteroid compared with corticosteroid alone. Single trials reported improved disease control with estramustine-vinblastine, vinorelbine-hydrocortisone, and suramin-hydrocortisone compared to controls. Trials of non-cytotoxic agents have reported equivocal results.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel-based chemotherapy modestly improves survival and provides palliation for men with HRPC and metastases. Other than androgen deprivation therapy, this is the only other therapy to have demonstrated improved overall survival in prostate cancer in RCTs. Further investigations to identify more effective therapies for HRPC including the use of systemic therapies earlier in the natural history of prostate cancer are warranted.

Phase II study of perifosine in previously untreated patients with metastatic melanoma

PURPOSE

To assess the response rate and toxicity of the alkylphosphocholine analogue, perifosine, in patients with metastatic or recurrent malignant melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had histologically proven, unidimensionally measurable disease which was incurable by standard therapy. Prior adjuvant immunotherapy was allowed but patients had not received prior chemotherapy. Perisfosine was given orally as a loading dose of 900 mg on day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of 150 mg po on days 2-21 in a 28 day cycle. The loading dose was 300 mg on day 1 of all subsequent cycles. Tumour response was assessed every 2 cycles.

RESULTS

18 patients were accrued over 7 mos. No objective responses occurred in the 14 evaluable patients. Three patients (21%) achieved stable disease after 2 cycles and 11 had progression. Seventeen patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicities included: diarrhea (12%), arthralgia (12%), nausea (6%), headache (6%), and fatigue (6%). No grade 3 or 4 hematological or biochemical toxicity were observed. Seventy-seven percent of patients received >or=90% of planned cycle 1 dose intensity and 58% received >or=90% of planned dose for cycle 2+. Four patients required dose reductions; treatment was delayed in 5 patients; and 5 patients missed doses because of toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Perifosine can be safely administered when given as an initial loading dose followed by daily maintenance therapy over 28 days. Gastrointestinal toxicity is common but generally of low grade. Hematological toxicity is minimal. No objective responses were observed. No further development of single-agent perifosine is recommended in malignant melanoma.

Role of transrectal ultrasound guided salvage cryosurgery for recurrent prostate carcinoma after radiotherapy

Despite improvements in treatment of localized prostate cancer, local recurrence remains a significant problem. A total of 46 patients with proven local cancer recurrence following external beam radiotherapy entered a prospective clinical trial using ultrasound-guided cryosurgery to ablate the residual prostate gland. Persistent complications included one urethra-rectal fistula, incontinence (2), retention (3), and treatment induced erectile dysfunction (7). Using the PSA definitions for biochemical failure as PSA>or=0.3 ng/ml, the Kaplan-Meier plots showed the incidence of patients to be free of biochemical recurrence at 51 and 44% at 1 and 2 y, respectively. For a PSA>or=1.0, the values at 1 and 2 y were 72 and 58%.

A multinomial Phase II study of lonafarnib (SCH 66336) in patients with refractory urothelial cancer☆

PURPOSE

Protein farnesylation by farnesyltransferase (FTase) is required for membrane localization and effective signal transduction by G-proteins, including Ras. Lonafarnib inhibits FTase and has shown antitumor activity in both preclinical and clinical settings. As disturbances in Ras signaling pathways have been implicated in the pathogenesis of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), the antitumor activity of lonafarnib was studied in a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Phase II trial in patients with previously treated TCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had at least 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced unresectable or metastatic TCC, or recurrence less than 1 year after adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Lonafarnib was given at a dose of 200 mg PO twice daily continuously, with cycles repeated every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Between December 1999 and December 2000, 19 eligible patients were enrolled at 8 National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group centers. Median time on treatment was 7.1 weeks (range, 0.6-23.9). Drug-related Grade 3 toxicities included fatigue, anorexia, nausea, confusion, dehydration, muscle weakness, depression, headache, and dyspnea. Five patients discontinued the study protocol due to toxicity. No responses were observed in 10 patients who were evaluable. Of 9 patients not evaluable for response, 5 had symptomatic progression, fulfilling multinomial criteria to stop the study after the first stage.

CONCLUSION

No single-agent activity of lonafarnib was observed in this study of patients with aggressive TCC failing prior chemotherapy.

Compliance and outcome of patients with stage 1 non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) managed with surveillance programs in seven Canadian centres

OBJECTIVE

We evaluate the impact of surveillance programs on the outcome of men with clinical stage 1 NSGCT following orchidectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 197 patients with a minimum of 2 years follow-up at seven cancer centres was conducted. Histological characteristics of the primary tumor were recorded for each patient. Surveillance protocols consisted of clinical assessments, chest X-rays, serum beta HCG (bHCG), alpha feto-protein (aFP), and abdominopelvic CT. All clinic visits and test completions were tracked. In accordance with each centre's specific surveillance protocol, patient compliance was defined as missing no more than two assessments/year.

RESULTS

Overall 5 year survival was 100%. With a median follow-up of 54 months (range: 11-164 months), the relapse rate at 5 years was 29%. The median time to relapse was 6 months (range: 2-135 months). Ninety percent of relapses occurred within 18 months and only two patients relapsed after 5 years. On univariate analysis, only the presence of lymphovascular invasion was predictive of relapse. The first indicator of relapse was: CT alone, 36%; elevated bHCG or aFP, 29%; CXR, 10%; or clinical exam, 7%. Either CT, tumor markers, or CXR detected 90% of all relapses. Although differences in the frequency of assessments between the centres existed, no significant differences occurred in rates of relapse or survival (p>0.07). The mean rate of compliance with clinic visit (which included CXR and tumor markers) was 78% (range: 68.4-94.2%). The mean rate of compliance with CT scanning, was 64.3% (range: 32.2-100%). In the centre with the protocol requiring the least frequent visits, the rates of compliance were observed to be highest.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance remains an effective means of managing stage 1 NSGCT despite variability in protocols and in patients compliance. An abnormal CT was the most frequent identifier of disease relapse, and in combination with tumor markers and CXR, 90% of relapses were detected within 2 years of orchiectomy. Modifications of surveillance protocols to less frequent assessments may be possible and should be subject to prospective evaluation.

Randomized phase II study of two doses of gefitinib in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group

PURPOSE

Overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor has been demonstrated in advanced prostate cancer and is associated with a poor outcome. A multi-institutional, randomized, phase II study was undertaken by the National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two doses of oral gefitinib in patients with minimally symptomatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July and November 2001, 40 patients with HRPC and increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or progression in measurable disease who had not received prior chemotherapy were randomly assigned to 250 mg (n = 19) or 500 mg (n = 21) oral gefitinib daily continuously. The primary end points were PSA response rate and objective measurable response. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Prostate Cancer Subscale (FACT-P) quality-of-life questionnaires were completed at baseline and during treatment.

RESULTS

None of the patients demonstrated a PSA or objective measurable response. Five (14.3%) of 35 assessable patients had stable PSA (one patient at 250 mg and four patients at 500 mg), and five patients (14.3%) had a best response of stable disease (duration, 2.5 to 16.8 months). No significant effect on the rate of increase in PSA was seen. The most common drug-related nonhematologic toxicities observed were grade 1 to 2 diarrhea (250 mg, 65%; 500 mg, 56%), fatigue (250 mg, 29%; 500 mg, 33%), and grade 1 to 2 skin rash (250 mg, 24%; 500 mg, 39%). FACT-P scores decreased during treatment, indicating worsening of symptoms compared with baseline.

CONCLUSION

Gefitinib did not result in any responses in PSA or objective measurable disease at either dose level. Gefitinib has minimal single-agent activity in HRPC.

Phase II trial of flavopiridol, a cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor, in untreated metastatic malignant melanoma

PURPOSE

To test the activity of the cyclin dependent kinase (cdk) inhibitor flavopiridol in malignant melanoma, a disease with frequent abnormalities of the cyclin dependent kinase system.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had histologically proven, unidimensionally measurable malignant melanoma, incurable by standard therapy. Prior adjuvant immunotherapy was allowed, but patients were otherwise untreated for advanced disease. Flavopiridol was administered at a dose of 50 mg/m(2) IV over 1 hour daily x 3 days every 3 weeks. Patients were assessed for response every 2 cycles.

RESULTS

17 patients were accrued over 5 months. No objective responses were documented in the 16 patients evaluable for response. Seven patients (44%) had stable disease after 2 cycles, with a median of 2.8 months (range 1.8-9.2). The most common treatment-related non-hematologic toxicities were diarrhea (82%), nausea (47%), fatigue (41%), anorexia (35%) and vomiting (29%). Most treatment-related toxicities were mild, except for diarrhea (grade 3 in 3 patients, grade 4 in 1 patient), nausea (grade 3 in 1 patient) and tumor pain (grade 3 in 1 patient). Hematologic toxicities were minimal, none worse than grade 2. Eighty-eight percent of patients received >/=90% planned dose intensity; 2 patients had dose reductions for gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Flavopiridol is well tolerated at the dose regimen used in this study, with an acceptable (primarily GI) toxicity profile. Although 7 of the 16 patients had stable disease ranging from 1.8 to 9.2 months in duration, there was no evidence of significant clinical activity in malignant melanoma by objective response criteria.

Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of mitoxantrone/prednisone and clodronate versus mitoxantrone/prednisone and placebo in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and pain

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence of palliative response in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC) treated with mitoxantrone and prednisone (MP) plus clodronate with that of patients treated with MP plus placebo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men with HRPC, bone metastases, and bone pain were randomly assigned to receive clodronate 1,500 mg administered intravenously (IV) or placebo every 3 weeks, in combination with mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks and prednisone 5 mg orally bid. Patients completed the present pain intensity (PPI) index and Prostate Cancer-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument at each treatment visit and used a diary to record analgesic use on a daily basis. The primary end point was a reduction to zero or of two points in the PPI or a decrease of 50% in analgesic intake, without increase in either.

RESULTS

The study accrued 209 eligible patients over 44 months. One hundred sixty patients (77%) had mild PPI scores (1 or 2), and 49 (24%) had moderate PPI scores (3 or 4). The primary end point of palliative response was achieved in 46 (46%) of 104 patients on the clodronate arm and in 41 (39%) of 105 patients on the placebo arm (P =.54). The median duration of response, symptomatic disease progression-free survival, overall survival, and overall quality of life were similar between the arms. Subgroup analysis suggested possible benefit in patients with more severe pain.

CONCLUSION

MP provides useful palliation in symptomatic men with HRPC. Clodronate does not increase the rate of palliative response or overall quality of life. Clodronate may be beneficial to patients who have moderate pain, but this requires further confirmation.

Phase II trial of pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract

34 patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who had not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated with pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) 50 mg/m(2) by a 1-h intravenous infusion (i.v.) every 4 weeks in a multi-institutional phase II trial. 6 of 30 evaluable patients had a partial response to treatment (20%; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 8-39%) and seven patients had stable disease. Toxicities were primarily non-haematological, but severe palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), lethargy and anorexia were infrequent. Despite a high proportion of patients with poor prognostic features, PLD had clinically significant activity in urothelial cancer in this study. The activity and unique toxicity profile of this drug make it of interest for further study in advanced urothelial cancers in combination with other active agents.

Phase II study of troxacitabine (BCH-4556) in patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group

PURPOSE

A multi-institution phase II study was undertaken by National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of intravenous troxacitabine (Troxatyl; Shire Pharmaceuticals Plc, Laval, Quebec, Canada), in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 1999 and March 2000, 35 patients (24 male) with a mean age of 60 years who had advanced and/or metastatic disease were treated with troxacitabine given as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes at a dose of 10 mg/m2 intravenously, once every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Of the 33 of 35 patients evaluable for response, there were two confirmed partial responses, 21 patients had stable disease (median duration, 4.4 months), and 10 patients had progressive disease. Eight patients remained stable for more than 6 months, of whom six remain free of progression. The most common drug-related nonhematologic toxicities observed were skin rash (77.1%), hand-foot syndrome (68.6%), alopecia (51.4%), fatigue (51.4%), and nausea (57.1%). Out of a total of 145 cycles of treatment, 98 were given without steroid premedication, whereas 47 cycles were given with steroid premedication. Without premedication, skin rash occurred in 37% of cycles compared with 26% when steroids were given prophylactically.

CONCLUSION

Troxacitabine given at a dose of 10 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks was well tolerated in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer, with common toxicities being a moderate to severe granulocytopenia and skin rash. Steroid premedication may reduce the frequency and severity of the skin rash. Our current study suggests that the nucleoside analog troxacitabine may have modest activity against renal cell carcinoma; however, larger studies are required to confirm this.

Prospective trial of cryosurgical ablation of the prostate: five-year results

OBJECTIVES

To determine in a prospective pilot study the safety and efficacy of cryosurgical ablation for localized prostate carcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 87 cryosurgical procedures were performed on 76 consecutive patients between December 1994 and February 1998. All patients had histologically proved adenocarcinoma of the prostate, with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) readings of less than 30 ng/mL. Clinical evaluations, PSA determinations, and patient self-reported quality-of-life questionnaires (functional assessment of cancer treatment-prostate; FACT-P) were used to determine biochemical and clinical disease-free status and complications. Patients had a mean follow-up of 50 months (minimum 36).

RESULTS

Follow-up biopsies were performed in 73 patients, and 72 were negative for malignancy after one or more treatments. Ten patients required two treatments and 1 patient required three treatments. The 5-year overall and cancer-specific survival rate was 89% (95% confidence interval, 83% to 97%) and 98.6% (95% confidence interval, 96% to 100%), respectively. The undetectable PSA rate (less than 0.3 ng/mL) for low-risk patients (n = 13) was 60% at 5 years; for moderate-risk patients (n = 23), it was 77%, and for high-risk patients (n = 40), 48%. The corresponding percentage of patients with a PSA level less than 1.0 ng/mL at 5 years was 75%, 89%, and 76%. Sloughing occurred in 3 patients (3.9%), incontinence in 1 (1.3%), and testicular abscess in 1 (1.3%). At 3 years, 18 (47%) of 38 patients capable of unassisted intercourse at the time of cryosurgery had resumed sexual intercourse, 5 spontaneously and 13 with sildenafil or prostaglandin.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this prospective evaluation show cryosurgery to be both a safe and an effective option in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

The role of chemotherapy in advanced prostate cancer

The development of hormone resistance is an unfortunate final common pathway in most patients with advanced prostate cancer, resulting in a narrowing of therapeutic options for the clinician, and limited median survival of 10-12 months for the patient. While cytotoxic chemotherapy has been utilized for many years, its efficacy has been disappointing. Quality of life assessments are increasingly used in assessing response in hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC), and PSA has emerged as an important surrogate marker of response in both local and advanced disease. Estramustine and the taxanes have been investigated, as monotherapy and in combination, in the treatment of HRPC in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, a number of which are ongoing. Substantial advances in the management of HRPC over the past decade have led to renewed optimism that improvement in survival can be achieved, and support the belief that chemotherapy plays a role in this pursuit. In tandem with the development of new agents, refined means of assessing response have been developed, and represent a key component of new research strategies in HRPC.

Safety and efficacy of the multidrug-resistance inhibitor biricodar (VX-710) with concurrent doxorubicin in patients with anthracycline-resistant advanced soft tissue sarcoma

PURPOSE

Incel (biricodar, VX-710) restores drug sensitivity to P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein-1-expressing cells. This Phase I/II study evaluated the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of VX-710 plus doxorubicin in patients with inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic, anthracycline-resistant/refractory, soft tissue sarcoma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In Phase I, i.v. bolus doxorubicin at 60, 75, or 67.5 mg/m(2) was administered 8 h after initiation of a 72-h continuous i.v. (CIV) infusion of VX-710 (120 mg/m(2)/h) to cohorts of patients to establish a maximum tolerated dose. For efficacy evaluations in Phase II, eligible patients had inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic, anthracycline-resistant/refractory soft tissue sarcoma; < or =225 mg/m(2) cumulative prior doxorubicin; and adequate hematological, liver, and kidney function. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were enrolled in Phase I. Myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity with 75 and then 67.5 mg/m(2) doxorubicin, and the maximum tolerated dose was established at 60 mg/m(2) with VX-710, 120 mg/m(2)/h, 72-h CIV. VX-710 had no apparent effect on doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. Twenty-nine patients enrolled in Phase II were treated with VX-710, 120 mg/m(2)/h 72-h CIV, and 60 mg/m(2) doxorubicin. Among 26 evaluable patients, minimal activity was noted among 11 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs); however, in 15 patients with anthracycline-resistant sarcomas of other histologies, 2 achieved partial responses and 7 patients had disease stabilization with an overall median progression-free interval of 3.4 months.

CONCLUSION

Anthracycline resistance in GISTs appears to be independent of P-glycoprotein or multidrug resistance-associated protein-1 resistance mechanisms. However, the combination of VX-710 and doxorubicin resulted in objective responses or disease stabilization in patients with strictly defined anthracycline-refractory non-GIST sarcomas, which warrants further evaluation.

A retrospective analysis of the relationship between changes in serum PSA, palliative response and survival following systemic treatment in a Canadian randomized trial for symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

To investigate the relationship between changes in serum PSA, palliative response and survival following systemic treatment for symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 161 patients, treated with mitoxantrone and prednisone (M + P) (n = 80), or prednisone alone (P) (n = 81) from a Canadian randomized phase III clinical trial. PSA response was defined by > or =50% decline compared to baseline. Palliative response was defined by the primary and secondary endpoints of the trial. All responses were required to be maintained on two visits at least three weeks apart. The Cox proportional hazards model and a landmark analysis (at nine weeks) were used to evaluate survival differences between PSA responders and non-responders.

RESULTS

Using an intent-to-treat analysis in which patients with missing PSA data are considered non-responders, 34% of M + P and 11% of P patients achieved a PSA response (P = 0.0001). Nineteen of thirty-six (53%) patients with PSA response and twenty-six of ninety (29%) patients without PSA response achieved a palliative response (P = 0.001 Chi-square test, phi coefficient = 0.28). From the landmark analysis. PSA responders had longer survival than non-responders (P = 0.009). In multivariate analysis, better performance status, higher hemoglobin and PSA response (P < 0.001) predicted for survival, but palliative response did not (P = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant but imperfect statistical association between PSA response and palliative response. PSA response was associated with longer survival. Patients treated with M + P were more likely to achieve a PSA response and a palliative response than those treated with P.

Health-related quality of life in men with metastatic prostate cancer treated with prednisone alone or mitoxantrone and prednisone

PURPOSE

A combination of mitoxantrone plus prednisone is preferable to prednisone alone for reduction of pain in men with metastatic, hormone-resistant, prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of these treatments on health-related quality of life (HQL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Men with metastatic prostate cancer (n = 161) were randomized to receive either daily prednisone alone or mitoxantrone (every 3 weeks) plus prednisone. Those who received prednisone alone could have mitoxantrone added after 6 weeks if there was no improvement in pain. HQL was assessed before treatment initiation and then every 3 weeks using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Quality of Life Module-Prostate 14 (QOLM-P14), a trial-specific module developed for this study. An intent-to-treat analysis was used to determine the mean duration of HQL improvement and differences in improvement duration between groups of patients.

RESULTS

At 6 weeks, both groups showed improvement in several HQL domains, and only physical functioning and pain were better in the mitoxantrone-plus-prednisone group than in the prednisone-alone group. After 6 weeks, patients taking prednisone showed no improvement in HQL scores, whereas those taking mitoxantrone plus prednisone showed significant improvements in global quality of life (P =.009), four functioning domains, and nine symptoms (.001 < P <. 01), and the improvement (> 10 units on a scale of 0 to100) lasted longer than in the prednisone-alone group (.004 < P <.05). The addition of mitoxantrone to prednisone after failure of prednisone alone was associated with improvements in pain, pain impact, pain relief, insomnia, and global quality of life (.001 < P <.003).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with mitoxantrone plus prednisone was associated with greater and longer-lasting improvement in several HQL domains and symptoms than treatment with prednisone alone.

Compliance of clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor patients with surveillance

PURPOSE

We evaluate compliance and its effect on the outcome of patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor who underwent post-orchiectomy surveillance at the Tom Baker Cancer Centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1980 to 1994, 76 evaluable patients underwent surveillance at the Tom Baker Cancer Centre. The surveillance protocol consisted of clinical evaluation, chest x-ray and serum tumor marker measurements monthly in year 1, every 2 months in year 2, every 6 months in years 3 to 5 and yearly in years 6 to 10. Abdomen and pelvic computerized tomography (CT) were scheduled every 2 months in year 1 and every 4 months in year 2. Noncompliance was defined as missing 2 or more consecutive clinic visits, tumor marker measurements or chest x-rays or 1 or more CT scans.

RESULTS

Compliance with clinical evaluations was 61.5% in year 1 and 35.5% in year 2, whereas compliance with CT was only 25% and 11.8% in years 1 and 2, respectively. By univariate analysis diagnosis before 1990 predicted noncompliance, while age, marital status and distance from the center did not. Recurrent disease was detected in 28 patients (37%) at a median of 5.5 months after orchiectomy (range 1 to 49.5). Among the 47 compliant patients 23 had relapse and none died. Among the 29 noncompliant patients 5 had relapse and 2 died with central nervous system disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall compliance with this surveillance program was poor but this study was too small to demonstrate whether poor compliance adversely affects overall survival.

Gemcitabine: a promising new agent in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) in previously untreated patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients with measurable advanced transitional cell carcinoma who had received no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were scheduled to receive gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease was allowed if this was completed greater than 1 year prior to study entry. All patients were treated on an outpatient basis.

RESULTS

There were three complete responses and six partial responses seen in 37 assessable patients, for an overall response rate of nine of 37 (24.3%; 95% confidence interval, 12 to 41). Four patients remain in remission at 14, 23, 24, and 31 months. The median survival was 8 months with 17% of patients alive at 2 years. Treatment generally was well-tolerated with three patients having > or = grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, five having grade 3 neutropenia, two having grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and two episodes of febrile neutropenia. Most patients were able to receive the drug as scheduled with the primary reason for dose reduction or dose delay being neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine has promising single-agent activity against urothelial cancer with a favorable toxicity profile. Further studies in combination with other active agents are warranted.

A randomized, controlled trial of intravenous clodronate in patients with metastatic bone disease and pain

To evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous clodronate in ameliorating refractory bone pain in patients with metastatic bone disease, 60 patients with established osseous metastases and persistent bone pain were randomized to receive either clodronate (600 mg or 1500 mg in 500 mL of normal saline) or 500 mL of saline as placebo. After 2 weeks, the patients were crossed over to receive the alternate treatment. After another 2 weeks, each patient and investigator made a blinded choice. Daily visual analogue scales (VAS) and analgesic diaries were recorded throughout the study period. Forty-six patients were evaluable (77%). A treatment x period interaction was identified in the VAS and daily morphine equivalent dose (DMED) scores. First period analysis of the VAS scores for general pain, pain at rest, and pain upon movement demonstrated an average reduction of 13, 14, and 24 mm, respectively, from baseline, but were not significantly different from changes following placebo. The average change in DMED was -6.4 (SE = 2.9) following clodronate and was +24.6 (SE = 14.9) following placebo (p = 0.03). In the blinded choice of which agent resulted in improvement in pain, 26 (57%) patients chose clodronate, 12 (26%) chose placebo, and eight (17%) had no preference (p = 0.0021). For the investigators who also made a blinded selection, clodronate was chosen in 30 (65%) patients, placebo in ten (22%) patients, and no difference was apparent in six (13%) (p < 0.0001). Intravenous clodronate appeared to have analgesic effect in patients with refractory bone pain due to metastatic bone disease. The optimal dose and duration of effect require further evaluation, particularly in patients with stable disease and persistent bone pain.

Chemotherapy with mitoxantrone plus prednisone or prednisone alone for symptomatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer: a Canadian randomized trial with palliative end points

PURPOSE

To investigate the benefit of chemotherapy in patients with symptomatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer using relevant end points of palliation in a randomized controlled trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomized 161 hormone-refractory patients with pain to receive mitoxantrone plus prednisone or prednisone alone (10 mg daily). Nonresponding patients on prednisone could receive mitoxantrone subsequently. The primary end point was a palliative response defined as a 2-point decrease in pain as assessed by a 6-point pain scale completed by patients (or complete loss of pain if initially 1 +) without an increase in analgesic medication and maintained for two consecutive evaluations at least 3 weeks apart. Secondary end points were a decrease of > or = 50% in use of analgesic medication without an increase in pain, duration of response, and survival. Health-related quality of life was evaluated with a series of linear analog self-assessment scales (LASA and the Prostate Cancer-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument [PROSQOLI]), the core questionnaire of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), and a disease-specific module.

RESULTS

Palliative response was observed in 23 of 80 patients (29%; 95% confidence interval, 19% to 40%) who received mitoxantrone plus prednisone, and in 10 of 81 patients (12%; 95% confidence interval, 6% to 22%) who received prednisone alone (P = .01). An additional seven patients in each group reduced analgesic medication > or = 50% without an increase in pain. The duration of palliation was longer in patients who received chemotherapy (median, 43 and 18 weeks; P < .0001, log-rank). Eleven of 50 patients randomized to prednisone treatment responded after addition of mitoxantrone. There was no difference in overall survival. Treatment was well tolerated, except for five episodes of possible cardiac toxicity in 130 patients who received mitoxantrone. Most responding patients had an improvement in quality-of-life scales and a decrease in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy with mitoxantrone and prednisone provides palliation for some patients with symptomatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer.