How I manage myeloproliferative neoplasm-unclassifiable: Practical approaches for 2022 and beyond

Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-unclassifiable (MPN-U) or not otherwise specified represents a rare, poorly defined and heterogeneous group of MPNs. Disease incidence is difficult to define but likely represents close to 5% of all MPNs when strict World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria are applied. Dynamic review over time is required to assess if the disease can be re-classified into another MPN entity. A diagnosis of MPN-U leads to many challenges for both the patient and physician alike including lack of agreed monitoring and therapeutic guidelines, validated prognostic markers and licenced therapies coupled with exclusion from clinical trials. MPN-U has an inherent risk of an aggressive clinical course and transformation in some but who, and when to treat in the chronic phase, including identifying who may require more aggressive therapy at an earlier stage, remains elusive. Moreover, despite the significant thrombotic risk, there is no agreement on systematic primary thromboprophylaxis. We hereby provide a contemporary overview of MPN-U in addition to four illustrative cases providing our collective suggested approaches to clinical challenges.

Diagnostic and management strategies for Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Unclassifiable (MPN-U): An international survey of contemporary practice

Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Unclassifiable (MPN-U) is defined as an MPN that fails to meet the diagnostic criteria for any of the other defined classical or 'non-classical' MPNs. The reported incidence is variable, dependent on appropriate recognition, and the clinical course can be highly variable ranging from an indolent disorder through to an aggressive disease course with a significant risk of thrombosis, bulky splenomegaly, and debilitating symptom burden. Clinicians frequently manage these conditions according to the clinical concerns e.g. splenomegaly akin to the phenotype, but no evidence base exists. Currently, there are no widely accepted guidelines to deal with both the diagnostic work up and subsequent clinical management of this entity. We hence surveyed major International MPN centres to gain an understanding of common challenges in MPN-U management in 2021 and aid identification of considerable practice variations where harmonisation would be desirable. Such information is vital to support future consensus guidelines in addition to informing further collaborative studies.

McLornan D, Yakoub‐Agha I. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in older myelofibrosis patients: A study of the chronic malignancies working party of EBMT and the Spanish Myelofibrosis Registry

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is increasingly used in older myelofibrosis (MF) patients, but its risk/benefit ratio compared to non-transplant approaches has not been evaluated in this population. We analyzed the outcomes of allo-HCT in 556 MF patients aged ≥65 years from the EBMT registry, and determined the excess mortality over the matched general population of MF patients ≥65 years managed with allo-HCT (n = 556) or conventional drug treatment (n = 176). The non-transplant cohort included patients with intermediate-2 or high risk DIPSS from the Spanish Myelofibrosis Registry. After a median follow-up of 3.4 years, the estimated 5-year survival rate, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse incidence after transplantation was 40%, 37%, and 25%, respectively. Busulfan-based conditioning was associated with decreased mortality (HR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9) whereas the recipient CMV+/donor CMV- combination (HR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.4) and the JAK2 mutated genotype (HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.5) predicted higher mortality. Busulfan-based conditioning correlated with improved survival due to less NRM, despite its higher relapse rate when compared with melphalan-based regimens. Excess mortality was higher in transplanted patients than in the non-HCT cohort in the first year of follow-up (ratio: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.13-2.80), whereas the opposite occurred between the fourth and eighth follow-up years (ratio: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.18-0.53). Comparing the excess mortality of the two treatments, male patients seemed to benefit more than females from allo-HCT, mainly due to their worse prognosis with non-transplant approaches. These findings could potentially enhance counseling and treatment decision-making in elderly transplant-eligible MF patients.

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: proposed definitions and management strategies for graft failure, poor graft function and relapse: best practice recommendations of the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative approach in myelofibrosis (MF). Despite advances over recent decades, relapse and non-relapse mortality rates remain significant. Relapse rates vary between 15 and 25% across retrospective studies and management strategies vary widely, ranging from palliation to adoptive immunotherapy and, in some cases, a second allo-HCT. Moreover, in allo-HCT, there is a higher incidence of poor graft function and graft failure due to splenomegaly and a hostile "pro-inflammatory" marrow niche. The Practice Harmonisation and Guidelines subcommittee of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party (CMWP) of EBMT convened an international panel consisting of transplant haematologists, histopathologists and molecular biologists to propose practical, clinically relevant definitions of graft failure, poor graft function and relapse as well as management strategies following allo-HCT. A systematic approach to molecular monitoring, histopathological assessment and chimerism testing is proposed. These proposed recommendations aim to increase the accuracy and uniformity of reporting and to thereby facilitate the development of more consistent approaches to these challenging issues. In addition, we propose management strategies for these complications.

Current and future status of JAK inhibitors

An enhanced understanding of the importance of Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signalling in multiple disease states has led to an increasing applicability of therapeutic intervention with JAK inhibitors. These agents have revolutionised treatments for a heterogeneous group of disorders, such as myeloproliferative neoplasms, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and multiple immune-driven dermatological diseases, exemplifying rapid bench-to-bedside translation. In this Therapeutics paper, we summarise the currently available data concerning the successes and safety of an array of JAK inhibitors and hypothesise on how these fields could develop.

Clinicopathological characterisation of myeloproliferative neoplasm-unclassifiable (MPN-U): a retrospective analysis from a large UK tertiary referral centre

Myeloproliferative neoplasm-unclassifiable (MPN-U) presents an MPN-type phenotype that fails to meet diagnostic criteria for other MPN variants. Variability in the clinicopathological phenotypes presents many challenges. Amongst a registry cohort of 1512 patients with MPN, 82 with MPN-U were included, with a median (range) age of 49·7 (13-79) years. Albeit heterogeneous, common presentation features included raised lactate dehydrogenase, thrombocytosis and clustered/pleomorphic megakaryocytes on trephine biopsy. Thrombosis was common (21%), necessitating vigilance. The median event-free survival was 11·25 years (95% confidence interval 9·3-not reached), significantly shortened in cases with lower platelet counts (<500 × 10⁹ /l) and a leucocytosis (≥12 × 10⁹ /l) at presentation. Generation of potential MPN-U prognostic scores is required.

Altered immune response to the annual influenza A vaccine in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

The seasonal influenza A vaccine is recommended for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). We hypothesised that immune deregulation associated with MPNs may affect the immune response gained following vaccinations when compared to healthy controls. Using deep immunophenotyping with high-dimensional single-cell analysis and mass cytometry we could demonstrate an altered immune response in MPN patients following vaccination. We found that prior to vaccination, MPN patients had reduced numbers of naive CD4 T cells. Furthermore, at 3-weeks and 3-months post-vaccination there was evidence of both delayed and impaired B- and T-memory cells responses. Thus, although, the immune systems of MPN patients can 'recognise' the Influenza A vaccine, the response appears inferior compared to healthy controls.

Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy, and Therapeutic Potential of Momelotinib in the Treatment of Intermediate/High-Risk Myelofibrosis: Evidence to Date

Myelofibrosis is a heterogeneous disorder with regard to both molecular pathogenesis and clinical phenotype, ranging from an initial fairly indolent condition in some through to an aggressive and debilitating scenario with profound constitutional symptoms, cytopenia frequently requiring transfusional support, and massive splenomegaly. Many advances have been made within the therapeutic arena, and an increasing array of novel agents are now available for disease management. Within this review, we focus on the current and predicted role of the JAK inhibitor momelotinib (Sierra Oncology) in myelofibrosis, with an emphasis on clinical trial evaluation, drug efficacyand safety, and discuss the suggested place in the therapeutic paradigm of myelofibrosis in 2020 and beyond.

Current and future therapies for myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis is classified as a 'Philadelphia-chromosome negative' clonal myeloproliferative disorder. The heterogeneity of this condition and patient population and array of often challenging clinical manifestations can frequently make therapeutic decisions challenging. Despite many advances in therapy with targeted and combination approaches, following an enhanced understanding of underlying disease pathogenesis, cure only remains achievable with allogeneic stem cell transplant. This option is often limited to a small group of younger transplant-eligible patients with more advanced disease who have both a suitable donor and no or few co-morbidities. In this article, we will discuss up-to-date disease prognostication, common clinical challenges associated with myelofibrosis and both standard and novel therapeutic approaches. Increasingly complex prognostic modelling utilises patient-specific, haematological and genomic parameters to improve the accuracy of risk assessment and predict disease progression. We will also focus on difficult clinical scenarios such as disease-associated anaemia, thrombocytopenia and extremes of age. Future and evolving therapies within this field are highly anticipated and novel JAK inhibitor and non-JAK inhibitor-based therapy will also be discussed, including the new challenge of how to switch from one JAK inhibitor therapy to another.

Bone marrow niche dysregulation in myeloproliferative neoplasms

The bone marrow niche is a complex and dynamic structure composed of a multitude of cell types which functionally create an interactive network facilitating hematopoietic stem cell development and maintenance. Its specific role in the pathogenesis, response to therapy, and transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms has only recently been explored. Niche functionality is likely affected not only by the genomic background of the myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated mutated hematopoietic stem cells, but also by disease-associated 'chronic inflammation', and subsequent adaptive and innate immune responses. 'Cross-talk' between mutated hematopoietic stem cells and multiple niche components may contribute to propagating disease progression and mediating drug resistance. In this timely article, we will review current knowledge surrounding the deregulated bone marrow niche in myeloproliferative neoplasms and suggest how this may be targeted, either directly or indirectly, potentially influencing therapeutic choices both now and in the future.

Forging ahead or moving back: dilemmas and disappointments of novel agents for myeloproliferative neoplasms

The common 'Philadelphia chromosome'-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) comprise essential thrombocythaemia, polycythaemia vera and myelofibrosis. These are clinically diverse disorders and present many challenges during their course, ranging from the management of very indolent, chronic-phase disease through to very aggressive stages frequently associated with poor quality of life, heavy symptom burdens and potentially life expectancies of <18 months. Their management also requires expertise in thrombosis and haemostasis in addition to marrow failure, debilitating symptom control and balancing the 'pros and cons' of intensive therapy such as allogeneic stem cell transplant versus novel and established therapies. In the past 15 years this field has seen rapid advances following an understanding of the pivotal importance of constitutive Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) signalling, the interplay of the wider genomic landscape and the development of updated diagnostic criteria, prognostic scores and targeted therapies. In this article, we review the successes and failures of novel agents and approaches to MPN management.

Current and future role of fedratinib in the treatment of myelofibrosis

Fedratinib (INREBIC^® [fedratinib] capsules, Impact Biomedicines, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Celgene Corporation), is a potent JAK2 inhibitor that has been approved for use in myelofibrosis, both as a first-line agent and also in second line following ruxolitinib (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland) failure or intolerance. Within this article, we will review relevant preclinical and early/late clinical trial data concerning the use of fedratinib to treat myeloproliferative neoplasms. Moreover, we will review in detail the assumed safety issues that led to temporary cessation of all programs with the agent in 2013 which subsequently re-entered the clinical arena in 2017. We will discuss how physicians may safely transition a patient across from ruxolitinib to fedratinib following intolerance or lack of efficacy. At last, we will discuss potential future applications of this agent within the field.

Essential thrombocythaemia treated with recombinant interferon: 'real world' United Kingdom referral centre experience

Standard first-line therapy choice for essential thrombocythaemia (ET) requiring cytoreduction, supported by randomized trials, is low-dose aspirin with hydroxycarbamide, but the role of recombinant interferon-alfa (IFNα)-2a/2b and pegylated (PEG)-IFN-α-2a/2b is increasingly highlighted. Longer-term outcome data, however, remains somewhat scarce, particularly in the 'real world'. We hereby report on a large, well-annotated cohort of ET patients from a single referral centre undergoing therapy with either IFNα or (PEG)-IFN-α-2a/2b and demonstrate high rates of complete haematological responses, good tolerability and safety, low rates of thromboembolic events in compliant patients and confirm feasibility of long-term therapy in a significant proportion of patients.

State-of-the-art review: allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in 2019

Advances in understanding the pathogenesis and molecular landscape of myelofibrosis have occurred over the last decade. Treating physicians now have access to an ever-evolving armamentarium of novel agents to treat patients, although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative approach. Improvements in donor selection, conditioning regimens, disease monitoring and supportive care have led to augmented survival after transplantation. Nowadays, there are comprehensive guidelines concerning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with myelofibrosis. However, it commonly remains difficult for both physicians and patients alike to weigh up the risk-benefit ratio of transplantation given the inherent heterogeneity regarding both clinical course and therapeutic response. In this timely review, we provide an up-to-date synopsis of current transplantation recommendations, discuss usage of JAK inhibitors before and after transplantation, examine donor selection and compare conditioning platforms. Moreover, we discuss emerging data concerning the impact of the myelofibrosis mutational landscape on transplantation outcome, peritransplant management of splenomegaly, poor graft function and prevention/management of relapse.

Family Mismatched Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: Report from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

This analysis included 56 myelofibrosis (MF) patients transplanted from family mismatched donor between 2009 and 2015 enrolled in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database. The median age was 57years (range, 38 to 72); 75% had primary MF and 25% had secondary MF. JAK2 V617F was mutated in 61%. Donors were HLA mismatched at 2 or more loci. Stem cells were sourced from bone marrow in 66% and peripheral blood in 34%. The median CD34⁺ cell dose was 4.8 × 10⁶/kg (range, 1.7 to 22.9; n = 43). Conditioning was predominantly myeloablative in 70% and reduced intensity in the remainder. Regimens were heterogeneous with thiotepa, busulfan, fludarabine, and post-transplant cyclophosphamide used in 59%. The incidence of neutrophil engraftment by 28days was 82% (range, 70% to 93%), at a median of 21days (range, 19 to 23). At 2years the cumulative incidence of primary graft failure was 9% (95% CI 1% to 16%) and secondary graft failure was 13% (95% CI 4% to 22%). The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II to IV and III to IV was 28% (95% CI 16% to 40%) and 9% (95% CI 2% to 17%) at 100days. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was 45% (95% CI 32% to 58%), but the cumulative incidence of death without chronic GVHD by 1 year was 20% (95% CI 10% to 31%). With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 1- and 2-year overall survival was 61% (95% CI 48% to 74%) and 56% (95% CI 41% to 70%), respectively. The 1- and 2- year progression-free survival was 58% (95% CI 45% to 71%) and 43% (95% CI 28% to 58%), respectively, with a 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse of 19% (95% CI 7% to 31%). The 2-year nonrelapse mortality was 38% (95% CI 24% to 51%). This retrospective study of MF allo-SCT using family mismatched donors demonstrated feasibility of the approach, timely neutrophil engraftment in over 80% of cases, and acceptable overall and progression-free survival rates with relapse rates not dissimilar to the unrelated donor setting. However, strategies to minimize the risk of graft failure and the relatively high nonrelapse mortality need to be used, ideally in a multicenter prospective fashion.

Outcome of patients with Myelofibrosis relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplant: a retrospective study by the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT

Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative approach for Myelofibrosis (MF). Scarce information exists in the literature on the outcome and, indeed, management of those MF patients who relapse following transplant. We hereby report on the management and outcome of 202 patients who relapsed post allo-HSCT for MF.