Serial defibrillation lead impedance in patients with epicardial and nonthoracotomy lead systems

INTRODUCTION

The stability of implantable cardiac defibrillation lead impedance subsequent to implantation has not been reported and may have important clinical implications. The objective was to characterize the incidence and degree of impedance changes occurring after implantation of defibrillation lead systems.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of patients who received epicardial or nonthoracotomy lead systems. Defibrillation impedance was recorded at implantation, prior to hospital discharge (predischarge), and during follow-up. For each individual the magnitude of the impedance change relative to implantation was characterized. Among patients with an epicardial system, a significant decrease in impedance was observed at predischarge (mean 9.3 omega). The magnitude of the decrease was large in 39% and moderate in 31% of individuals. Subsequently, a gradual rise in mean impedance was apparent. At 18-21 months postimplantation, impedance was significantly increased relative to implantation (mean 6.8 omega). At this time, the magnitude of the increase was large in 46% and moderate in 23% of patients. Among patients with a nonthoracotomy lead system including a subcutaneous patch, a significant decrease in mean impedance was observed at predischarge (mean 3.5 omega). The magnitude of the decrease was large in 8% and moderate in 50% of individuals. Subsequently, a gradual rise in impedance was apparent. At 5-6 months, it was significantly increased relative to implantation (mean 2.3 omega). The magnitude of the increase was large in 10% and moderate in 33% of patients. Among the group of patients whose nonthoracotomy lead system did not include a subcutaneous patch, there was no significant change in mean impedance at predischarge relative to implantation. In subsequent intervals, a gradual rise was apparent. At 5-6 months, impedance was significantly increased relative to implantation (mean 4.3 omega). The magnitude of the increase was large in 16% and moderate in 47% of individuals.

CONCLUSION

Significant changes in defibrillation lead impedance occur after implantation of epicardial and nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems. These data may serve as a standard for identifying the anticipated maximum change in lead impedance and thus may be useful as a tool for recognizing problems with defibrillation lead integrity.

The results of atrial flutter ablation in patients with and without a history of atrial fibrillation

To determine the impact of atrial flutter radiofrequency catheter ablation on recurrence of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation, 32 patients with atrial flutter (18 with a history of atrial fibrillation) were followed for a mean of 8.6 months; atrial flutter has not recurred after 1 (26 patients) or 2 (5 patients) successful ablation procedures. Atrial flutter did not appear proarrhythmic for atrial fibrillation, with only 1 of 15 patients without a history of atrial fibrillation developing the arrythmia in the absence of an alcohol binge or cocaine use.

Factors associated with successful implantation of nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems

Two hundred forty-three consecutive patients underwent attempted implantation of nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead (NTL) systems. The importance of clinical and lead-related factors were analyzed regarding their relation with implantation failure caused by an unacceptably high defibrillation threshold (DFT). Overall, 33 (14%) of 243 patients failed NTL implantation. Patients undergoing attempted implantation of NTL systems with monophasic shock waveforms (monophasic group, n = 145) had an incidence of failed implantation of 22% (n = 32) versus an incidence of 1% (n = 1) among patients undergoing attempted implantation by using biphasic shock waveforms (biphasic group, n = 98; odds ratio, 26.9; p < 0.001). The incidence of success and simplicity of implantation of NTL systems was markedly improved in patients undergoing NTL implantation by using biphasic shock waveforms. Clinical factors could be used to stratify patients in the monophasic group for their risk of implantation failure. In the biphasic group, no clinical factor could be correlated with a low DFT with a fully endovascular system.

Early postoperative rise in defibrillation threshold in patients with nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems: attenuation with biphasic shock waveforms

INTRODUCTION

In patients with non-thoracotomy defibrillation lead (NTL) systems coupled with monophasic shock waveforms, the defibrillation threshold (DFT) rises early after implantation. There is little information regarding features predictive of the DFT rise, or DFT changes early after implantation of NTL systems coupled with biphasic shock waveforms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

DFT measurements were performed serially at implantation, prior to hospital discharge (mean 4 +/- 3 days), and at follow-up (mean 49 +/- 22 days) in 146 patients with an NTL system. Factors were assessed for association with a "clinically important" early postimplantation DFT rise, defined as a rise of > or = 2 energy steps (2 to 4 J per step; > or = 5 J total). A clinically important early postimplantation DFT rise occurred in 48 patients (33%). Univariate predictors of the rise included the monophasic shock waveform, the Medtronic Transvene lead system, the presence of a subcutaneous defibrillation patch, and the number of shocks delivered during the implantation procedure. However, the only independent predictor of a clinically important DFT rise was the monophasic shock waveform (F = 18, P < 0.001). For the monophasic patient group (n = 79), the incidence of a DFT rise was 53% (n = 42). For the biphasic patient group (n = 67), the incidence of a DFT rise was 9% (n = 6). The clinical characteristics of the monophasic and biphasic groups were not significantly different, nor were their DFTs at implantation. Among a subgroup of 18 consecutive patients who underwent serial DFT testing utilizing both monophasic and biphasic waveforms, the incidence of a clinically important DFT rise with monophasic (n = 9,50%) was higher than with biphasic shocks (n = 3,17%; P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

NTL systems coupled with biphasic shock waveforms have an attenuated incidence of a clinically important DFT rise early after implantation, relative to patients with NTL systems coupled to monophasic waveforms.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia with unusual left atrial sites of origin: report of two cases

Two cases of successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of adult-onset atrial tachycardia originating from the left atrium adjacent to the mitral annulus are presented. Endocardial catheter activation mapping performed by retrograde or atrial transseptal approach revealed presystolic activation at the successful ablation site in both patients, and fractionation during sinus rhythm and tachycardia in one. The 12-lead electrocardiographic P wave appearance was suggestive of a left atrial tachycardia origin in both cases.

Idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia: narrowing the anatomic location for successful ablation

Pace mapping used to locate the site for ablation of idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) ventricular tachycardia remains difficult and time-consuming. A method to facilitate pace mapping and the most common site of ablation of this tachycardia are reported. In 18 consecutive patients with RVOT ventricular tachycardia, electrocardiographic criteria based on the QRS orientation in lead 1 and the R wave progression in the precordial leads were used to find pace maps matching the arrhythmia. Identical pace maps were obtained on the septum of the RVOT in 16 patients and resulted in successful ablations. These sites were concentrated in the anterior superior aspect of the RVOT determined by fluoroscopic imaging. In the remaining two cases identical pace maps could not be found in this area. The results of this study narrow the anatomic location for radiofrequency ablation of idiopathic RVOT ventricular tachycardia. This is the first description of an electrocardiography-guided approach to finding an identical pace map in the RVOT.

Effect of bundle branch block on local electrogram morphologic features: implications for arrhythmia diagnosis by stored electrogram analysis

Analysis of stored local ventricular electrogram recordings is a useful diagnostic tool in the evaluation of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Visual analysis of local electrogram morphologic features has been demonstrated to be useful in distinguishing ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular rhythm. The effect of bundle branch block (BBB) aberration during supraventricular tachycardia on local electrogram morphologic features is not entirely clear. Erroneous diagnoses resulting from a change in electrogram morphologic features with BBB may occur. To determine whether the development of BBB can produce a change in local electrogram morphologic features and whether this change is dependent on the site of recording, we retrospectively reviewed local electrogram recordings from 23 patients who had intermittent BBB during electrophysiologic evaluation of documented or suspected supraventricular tachycardia. Local electrogram recordings from catheters placed in the right ventricular apex and coronary sinus during supraventricular tachycardia with BBB aberrancy were compared with recordings during narrow complex supraventricular tachycardia or normal sinus rhythm. Bipolar recordings were made with a 5 mm interelectrode distance with filter settings at 40 to 400 Hz. Three independent blinded observers defined the paired electrograms as the same or distinctly different. During right BBB a change in electrogram morphologic features was demonstrated in 11 (85%) of 13 recordings from the right ventricular apex and in only 1 (8%) of 12 recordings from the coronary sinus. In contrast, during left BBB a change in electrogram morphologic features was seen in 6 (100%) of 6 recordings from the coronary sinus and in only 1 (8%) of 13 recordings from the right ventricular apex. These results demonstrate that when the described recording techniques are used, a change in local ventricular electrogram morphologic features BBB is predominantly manifest in recording sites ipsilateral to the BBB, whereas recording sites contralateral to the BBB are relatively unaffected. This information may have implications regarding interpretation of stored electrograms when an attempt is made to establish a rhythm diagnosis leading to implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

Effects of high and low shock energies on sinus electrograms recorded via integrated and true bipolar nonthoracotomy lead systems

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this investigation was to prospectively evaluate the voltage- and time-dependent characteristics of a biphasic defibrillator discharge on the amplitude of the rate sensing electrogram recorded from two "integrated" and one true bipolar nonthoracotomy lead system. Prolongation of redetection time has been noted after a failed first shock with nonthoracotomy lead systems. However, a prospective evaluation of the time- and voltage-dependent effects of biphasic shocks on electrogram amplitude with clinically utilized lead systems has not been systematically performed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Five- then 30-J R wave synchronous biphasic discharges were delivered during the supraventricular rhythm through three nonthoracotomy lead systems (Medtronic Transvene, Ventritex TVL, and CPI Endotak C 60 Series). The R wave amplitude was measured immediately postshock and for up to 1 minute. Amplitude changes were compared with preshock baseline value. A 5-J discharge had minimal effect on the R wave amplitude recorded from the three lead systems; however, 30 J resulted in significant diminution in R wave amplitude recorded from the integrated bipolar leads (in the Endotak lead to a greater extent than the TVL lead) with minimal effects on the Transvene lead. Following a 30-J discharge, the time constant for R wave recovery was 4.2, 14.9, and 15.3 seconds for Transvene, TVL, and Endotak 60 leads, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There are voltage- and time-dependent reductions in postshock R wave amplitude. Integrated bipolar systems appear more affected than the "true" bipolar lead evaluated. This may be due, in part, to lead design, distance of distal defibrillating surface from rate sensing cathode, and the incorporation of the defibrillating surface as the rate sensing anode. The influence of post-shock R wave diminution on subsequent redetection remains speculative but may have implications for subsequent lead development.

Utility of the 12-lead electrocardiogram in localizing the origin of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia

The purpose of this investigation was to develop an algorithm on the basis of the QRS morphology observed on the 12-lead ECG that would rapidly locate the site of origin of the monomorphic ventricular tachycardia arising from the septal portion of the RVOT. Radiofrequency catheter ablation guided by pace-mapping techniques has proven effective in eliminating the ventricular tachycardia originating from the RVOT in the absence of structural heart disease. A method that would rapidly identify the portion of the RVOT septum toward which more detailed pace-mapping should be directed before catheter ablation would be useful in decreasing procedure time and radiation exposure and potentially facilitating a successful ablation procedure. The RVOT septum was divided into nine sites. In 11 patients, bipolar pacing was performed at each of the nine designated sites to mimic ventricular tachycardia. A standard 12-lead surface ECG was recorded during pacing. The QRS morphology in the limb leads was characterized and the site of the R-wave transition was determined in the precordial leads. A QS in lead a VR and a monophasic R wave in leads II, III, aVF, and V6 were noted in each patient at all paced sites. In lead I, pacing at the three posterior septal sites always resulted in an R wave. Pacing at the three anterior sites produced a dominant Q wave (either QS or Qr) at 17 (52%) of 33 sites or a qR complex at 16 (48%) of 33 sites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy of antitachycardia pacing in patients presenting with cardiac arrest

The efficacy of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) incorporated into implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) was assessed in 29 consecutive survivors of cardiac arrest, not attributable to acute myocardial infarction, ischemia, or drug and electrolyte effects. The cohort included 25 men and 4 women with a mean age of 65 years and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 29%. Seventeen patients had coronary artery disease, 11 had nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, and 1 had long QT syndrome. Programmed stimulation yielded monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 17 patients, polymorphic VT in 6, and no inducible VT in 6. During a mean follow-up of 22 months, a total of 91 episodes of monomorphic VT occurred, 73 of which were successfully pace terminated (83%). Monomorphic VT amenable to pace termination recurred only in the group that had this arrhythmia inducible. The recurrent arrhythmias in the 12 patients having either no inducible VT or polymorphic VT were all rapid VTs, having a cycle length < 220 ms; and therefore, not amenable to pace termination. These results suggest that ATP incorporated into ICDs is useful in survivors of cardiac arrest and may significantly reduce the number of shocks that these patients would otherwise receive. Programmed stimulation may also help to define those patients who would receive the maximum benefit from ATP.

Benefits and lessons learned from stored electrogram information in implantable defibrillators

Implantable defibrillators have evolved from simple event counters to sophisticated diagnostic monitoring units capable of storing electrocardiographic information surrounding arrhythmia events and device therapy. In this review, the nature and characteristics of these stored electrocardiographic recordings are discussed and examples displayed. Potential benefits and limitation of stored electrogram analysis are described with respect to both clinical utility and the ability to enhance our understanding of ventricular arrhythmogenesis. Finally, future developments to improve data storage, retrieval, and analysis are identified.

Postoperative lead-related complications in patients with nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to document postoperative complications attributable to nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems in a large cohort.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of postoperative complications specifically associated with nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems is unknown.

METHODS

Postoperative lead-related complications were evaluated in 170 patients with a nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead system who were followed up for a mean (+/- SD) of 17 +/- 12 months. Each system incorporated one or more intravascular leads. In 117 patients (69%), the system incorporated a subcutaneous defibrillation patch. All implantations were performed in an operating room by cardiothoracic surgeons. Defibrillation thresholds were measured at implantation, before hospital discharge (mean 3 +/- 2 days) and at 4 to 18 weeks after implantation. Patients were evaluated every 2 to 3 months after implantation or as indicated by clinical exigency.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (15.9%) were diagnosed with a lead-related complication that either extended the initial hospital period or led to a second hospital admission. Complications included endocardial lead or subcutaneous defibrillation patch dislodgment in eight patients (4.7%), which was diagnosed between 2 and 345 days after implantation; endocardial or subcutaneous patch lead fracture in six (3.5%), which was diagnosed between 53 and 600 days after implantation; subcutaneous patch mesh fracture in one, which was diagnosed at 150 days after implantation; subclavian vein thrombosis in three (1.8%), which was diagnosed at 2 to 50 days after implantation; and unacceptably elevated defibrillation threshold (within 5 J of maximal device output) in nine (5.3%), which was documented at one of the two postimplantation evaluations in eight patients or at the time of failure to terminate a spontaneous ventricular tachycardia in one. Seventeen of the 27 patients required reoperation for correction of their complication. In addition, system infection requiring complete explantation occurred in seven other patients (4.1%) at an interval from implantation ranging from 14 to 120 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative complications related to a nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead system were common and frequently required reoperation for correction. The rate of system explantation due to infection was also significant. Postoperative defibrillation testing and vigilant outpatient follow-up evaluation are necessary to ensure normal lead function.

Postshock sensing performance in transvenous defibrillation lead systems: analysis of detection and redetection of ventricular fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

The sensing performance of transvenous lead systems may be adversely affected by the delivery of high-energy shocks. This may be due to the proximity of the sensing and energy-delivery electrodes on transvenous leads.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The time required for detection of ventricular fibrillation and redetection after a failed first shock was compared in 93 patients with five different lead system-pulse generator combinations: Cadence--Endotak 60 series, Ventak P--Endotak 60 series, Jewel--Transvene, Cadence--TVL, and Cadence--Transvene. A total of 418 successful and 204 failed first shocks were delivered during induced ventricular fibrillation. Redetection times (RED) were consistently shorter than detection times (DET) in the Jewel-Transvene (RED minus DET: -1.9 +/- 0.8 sec, P < 0.0001), the Cadence-TVL (-1.6 +/- 1.0 sec, P < 0.0001), and the Cadence-Transvene combinations (-2.0 +/- 0.9 sec, P < 0.0004). Redetection times were not significantly different than detection times in the Cadence-Endotak combination (0.9 +/- 3.1 sec; P = 0.09). Redetection times were significantly longer than detection times in the Ventak-Endotak combination (1.2 +/- 2.3 sec; P = 0.034). Prolonged individual redetection episodes (> 8.2 sec) were observed in the Cadence-Endotak (7 [10%] of 73 episodes) and the Ventak-Endotak (4 [10%] of 39 episodes), but not in the Jewel-Transvene, the Cadence-TVL, and the Cadence-Transvene combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Redetection of ventricular fibrillation may be delayed in some transvenous lead-pulse generator combinations. Successful redetection of ventricular fibrillation following a failed first shock should be demonstrated prior to hospital discharge of patients with implantable defibrillators.

Circadian variation of ventricular arrhythmia recurrences after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients with healed myocardial infarcts

Past studies using Holter monitoring and retrospective reviews of death certificates have documented peak occurrence of sudden death and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the morning hours. We used the Ventritex Cadence device (Ventritex, Sunnyvale, California) which documents the date and time of all stored arrhythmias leading to device therapy to evaluate the circadian pattern of sustained ventricular arrhythmia recurrence. Mean follow-up after defibrillator implantation was 628 +/- 285 days. All 390 patients had at least 1 episode (range 1 to 43) of sustained VT documented from analysis of the stored electrograms associated with an arrhythmia event. Stored electrograms were available for review and analysis in 3,041 device detections; 349 stored events were excluded because they did not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for VT or failed to document the onset of the ventricular arrhythmia at the beginning of the recorded event of the arrhythmia episode. Criteria for the diagnosis of VT or ventricular fibrillation were met in 2,692 arrhythmia episodes occurring in 390 patients. There was circadian variation for ventricular arrhythmia recurrence for the whole patient group with the data fit to the sinusoidal density function: f(t) = 126 - 51 x cos (-57 + 2 pi t/24) - 25 x sin (63 + 2 pi t/12) (p < 0.0001). Ventricular arrhythmia occurrence rate was lowest between 2:00 and 3:00 A.M., and highest between 10:00 and 11:00 A.M. In addition, the same circadian pattern was demonstrated regardless of patient age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction (< 35% or > or = 35%), and VT cycle length (< 300 or > or = 300 ms).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Insights into the electrophysiology of atrial arrhythmias gained by the catheter ablation experience: "learning while burning, Part II"

Although the development and wide-scale application of catheter ablative techniques has drastically changed the practice of electrophysiology, catheter ablation does not preclude physiologic investigation. On the contrary, given the precise and directed nature of this technique and the increased attention to detailed cardiac mapping that it requires, catheter ablation may be viewed as a tool to provide unique information about arrhythmia substrates. In this article, the insights provided by the catheter ablation experience into the pathophysiology of the focal atrial arrhythmias, atrial tachycardia, sinus node reentrant tachycardia, and inappropriate sinus tachycardia will be reviewed. Atrial arrhythmias were initially difficult to treat with ablative therapy, particularly because they can occur anywhere within the atria and the experience with mapping for surgical ablation was quite limited. A number of novel approaches to atrial mapping have been developed in response to this challenge, and presently, catheter ablation provides effective therapy for the majority of patients with focal atrial arrhythmias. In addition, deliberate attempts at "learning while burning" have already begun to enhance our understanding of the interaction of the structural and electrophysiologic aspects of the substrate for atrial arrhythmias.

Shock occurrence and survival in 49 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

To determine shock occurrence and survival, 49 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy presenting with cardiac arrest (82%), syncope (12%) or ventricular tachycardia without syncope (6%) were followed for 28 +/- 28 months after cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implant according to the intention to treat principle. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, the actuarial incidence for any spontaneous shocks was 20%, 58%, and 77%, and the incidence of appropriate shocks was 16%, 49%, and 72% at 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up, respectively. Only two of 49 study patients (4%) with an active ICD died suddenly during follow-up. Another two patients, however, with an inactive device died suddenly, resulting in a sudden death rate of 2% per year with an active ICD, and 5% per year, according to the intention to treat principle. The incidence of cardiac death from any cause was 8%, 25%, and 35%, and the incidence of total mortality was 14%, 39%, and 49% during 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up, respectively. There was no difference in the Kaplan-Meier survival curves for shocked vs non-shocked patients. Thus, in this selected patient population with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy the majority of patients received 'appropriate' shocks during follow-up, and the sudden death rate with active ICD is low.

Comparison of initial detection and redetection of ventricular fibrillation in a transvenous defibrillator system with automatic gain control

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate postshock redetection of ventricular fibrillation by a system that coupled an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with an automatic gain control sense amplifier and a transvenous lead system.

BACKGROUND

Redetection of ventricular fibrillation after an unsuccessful first shock has not been systematically evaluated. Previous studies have suggested that sensing performance of some lead systems may be adversely affected by the delivery of subthreshold shocks.

METHODS

The time required for both initial detection and redetection of ventricular fibrillation was compared in 22 patients. These times were estimated by subtracting the capacitor charge time from the total event time.

RESULTS

A total of 113 successful and 57 unsuccessful initial shocks were delivered during induced ventricular fibrillation. The mean +/- SD initial time to detection of ventricular fibrillation was 5.5 +/- 1.7 s (range 2.4 to 10.8); the time to redetection ranged from 1.5 to 18.5 s (mean 4.5 +/- 2.8, p = NS vs. detection time). Abnormal redetection episodes, defined as a redetection time > 10.2 s (i.e., > 2 SD above the mean redetection time), were observed in 4 (18%) of 22 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Redetection of ventricular fibrillation after a subthreshold first shock may be delayed. Device testing with intentional delivery of subthreshold shocks to verify successful postshock redetection of ventricular fibrillation should be performed routinely in all patients.

Insights into the electrophysiology of ventricular tachycardia gained by the catheter ablation experience: "learning while burning"

The success of catheter ablation has significantly improved the treatment of patients with cardiac arrhythmias and has established electrophysiology as an increasingly interventional subspecialty. Some members of the electrophysiology community have expressed concern that this success has been purchased at the cost of undermining what had been our primary concern: understanding the anatomic and physiologic basis of arrhythmia syndromes. In many laboratories, endpoints such as case load and primary success have eclipsed physiologic investigation. Despite these trends, however, catheter ablation is not inherently at odds with investigation and education. On the contrary, because the lesions delivered with current techniques are much more discrete than the effects of antiarrhythmic agents or surgical ablation, catheter ablation can be used as a research tool directed toward a more precise understanding of arrhythmia substrates. Conscious attempts at "learning while burning" have already provided important and unique information about arrhythmia pathogenesis.

Effectiveness of noninvasive programmed stimulation for initiating ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Previous generations of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) required invasive electrophysiological testing to assess defibrillator function. Newer third-generation ICDs include the capability for performing noninvasive programmed stimulation (NIPS) and may reduce the need for invasive studies to assess tachycardia recognition and antitachycardia therapy algorithms. The effectiveness of ICD-based NIPS for the induction of ventricular arrhythmias has not, however, been formally assessed. Third-generation ICDs were implanted in 79 patients, who underwent a total of 166 postoperative defibrillator tests. NIPS with rapid ventricular pacing was performed in all patients in an attempt to induce ventricular fibrillation. In patients with prior sustained uniform ventricular tachycardia, programmed stimulation with up to three extrastimuli was performed in order to attempt to initiate the clinical ventricular tachcardia. Ventricular fibrillation was induced with NIPS in 146 of 166 studies (88%). Ventricular tachycardia was initiated with NIPS in 104 of 123 studies (85%). The type of defibrillator and the use of endocardial or epicardial rate sensing/pacing leads did not influence the efficacy of NIPS. NIPS with third-generation ICDs is generally effective at inducing ventricular fibrillation and clinically relevant ventricular tachycardias, and reduces the need to perform invasive electrophysiological testing following device implantation. In a minority of patients temporary transvenous pacing catheters must still be used to facilitate arrhythmia induction.

Comparison of simultaneous versus sequential defibrillation pulsing techniques using a nonthoracotomy system

The defibrillation threshold (DFT) using simultaneous (SIML) versus sequential (SEQ) pathways for shock delivery was compared in 16 patients with an implanted cardioverter defibrillator. All patients had three-lead nonthoracotomy systems (NTL) using a left chest subcutaneous patch, a right ventricular endocardial lead, and a lead in the coronary sinus (n = 5) or superior vena cava (n = 11). The DFT were determined 2-44 days (17 +/- 17 days) after implantation. The DFT was defined as the lowest energy shock that resulted in successful defibrillation. The first pathway tested was SIML in 12 and SEQ in 4 patients with output beginning at or above the intraoperative DFT, routinely 18 J. The second pathway was tested beginning 2-4 J above the DFT of the first tested pathway. All shocks were delivered in 2-4 J decrement or increment steps. The SEQ pathway shocks resulted in a significantly lower DFT than SIML pathway shocks (14 +/- 6 vs 18 +/- 6 J; P < 0.01). There was no difference in the time delay after ventricular fibrillation initiation before shock delivery for the successful defibrillation between SIML versus SEQ pathways (7 +/- 2 secs for both pathways). In 7 of 16 patients, defibrillation using SEQ pathway resulted in a > 5 J lowering of DFT, while only one patient had > 5 J lowering of DFT using SIML shocks (P < 0.05). These results have important implications for selecting the optimal pathway for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy with a multilead NTL system.