CD19/BAFF-R dual-targeted CAR T cells for the treatment of mixed antigen-negative variants of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD19 mediate potent antitumor effects in B-cell malignancies including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but antigen loss remains the major cause of treatment failure. To mitigate antigen escape and potentially improve the durability of remission, we developed a dual-targeting approach using an optimized, bispecific CAR construct that targets both CD19 and BAFF-R. CD19/BAFF-R dual CAR T cells exhibited antigen-specific cytokine release, degranulation, and cytotoxicity against both CD19-/- and BAFF-R-/- variant human ALL cells in vitro. Immunodeficient mice engrafted with mixed CD19-/- and BAFF-R-/- variant ALL cells and treated with a single dose of CD19/BAFF-R dual CAR T cells experienced complete eradication of both CD19-/- and BAFF-R-/- ALL variants, whereas mice treated with monospecific CD19 or BAFF-R CAR T cells succumbed to outgrowths of CD19-/BAFF-R+ or CD19+/BAFF-R- tumors, respectively. Further, CD19/BAFF-R dual CAR T cells showed prolonged in vivo persistence, raising the possibility that these cells may have the potential to promote durable remissions. Together, our data support clinical translation of BAFF-R/CD19 dual CAR T cells to treat ALL.

Long-term follow-up of patients with poor-risk acute leukemia treated on a phase 2 trial undergoing intensified conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Patients with acute leukemia who undergo allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation with active disease have high rates of relapse and poor overall survival (OS) post-transplant compared to patients undergoing HCT in remission. Here, we report the long-term outcomes in 32 patients who received a high-intensity conditioning regimen comprising fractionated total body irradiation (FTBI; 1200 cGy) with pharmacokinetic (PK) dosing of intravenous Busulfan (IV BU) targeted to first dose area under curve (AUC) of 700-900 µM/min and etoposide (30 mg/kg) in a prospective phase 2 clinical trial. The median age of the patients at the time of HCT was 37 years (range: 18-50) presenting with high-risk (n = 6) and relapsed/refractory(r/r) acute leukemias (n = 26). All but one patient underwent HCT using peripheral blood stem cells from matched sibling donors. At a median follow-up of 17.3 years (range 14.4-19.0), 11 patients remained alive. The disease-free survival and OS at 15 years was 34% (versus 40% at 5-years post-HCT). The 15-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 26% and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 38% (95% CI: 21-54%) and the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 15 years was 33% using a prophylactic regimen of cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil. The most common life-threatening late effects were secondary malignancies, metabolic, or cardiac complications with a cumulative incidence of 6.6%, 6.6%, and 13.3%, respectively. No unusual late effects or patterns of relapse were noted on longer followed on patients treated with intensified myeloablative condition regimen. Results from this study supports continued development of intensive conditioning regimens in patients with r/r acute leukemias to improve leukemia free (LFS) and OS in this high-risk population.

Will immunotherapy lead to a breakthrough in the treatment of older adults with ALL?

Historically, older adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have done poorly with chemotherapy-based treatment. Therefore, new innovative approaches are urgently needed to improve outcomes for this population. CD19-targeted immunotherapies such as blinatumomab and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy have produced remarkable responses in relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell ALL, including clearance of minimal residual disease (MRD). Available data support the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab in older adults with advanced B-cell ALL. Therefore, its application is being extended to frontline regimens for B-cell ALL, particularly in older adults. There are several studies actively examining the role of blinatumomab alone or in combination with attenuated dosing of conventional chemotherapy or novel agents in older adults with newly diagnosed ALL and early data are encouraging. While CD19-targeted CAR (CD19CAR) T cell therapy is active in children and young adults with r/r B-cell ALL, data supporting its efficacy and safety in older adults with ALL is scarce. Furthermore, the commercially FDA approved CD19CAR T cell therapy product for r/r ALL is restricted only to patients ≤25 years of age. Although there are concerns about older adults tolerating the expected toxicities associated with CAR T cell therapy, which may be life threatening, tailored approaches for prophylactic and pre-emptive interventions combined with utilization of safer CAR T cell platforms may improve tolerability and further extend the use of this promising treatment to older patients with ALL. In this review, we will discuss the progress in immunotherapies for older adults with B-cell ALL and their potential for transforming frontline therapy for newly diagnosed patients.

Tacrolimus initial steady state level in post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based GvHD prophylaxis regimens

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) combined with tacrolimus (TAC) as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is safe and effective. Optimal serum levels of TAC in this combination remain undetermined. We hypothesized that TAC at initial steady state (TISS) of <10 ng/mL could promote optimal transplant outcomes and prevent TAC-associated toxicities. We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive case series of 210 patients who received PTCy/TAC-based prophylaxis post-HCT from 1/2013–6/2018. Patients received HCT from haploidentical (n=172) or mismatched donors (n=38), and flat dose (FD) or weight-based dose (WBD) TAC. Twenty-four-month overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and relapse rate (RR) were 61%, 56%, and 22%, respectively, in TISS <10 ng/mL cohort (n=176), and 50%, 43%, and 35%, respectively, in TISS ≥10 ng/mL cohort (n=34) (OS, P=0.71; DFS, P=0.097; RR, P=0.031). OS, DFS, RR, non-relapse mortality, acute GvHD grade II-IV, grade III-IV or chronic GvHD by TISS were similar in multivariable analysis. TISS ≥10 ng/mL conferred increased risk of viral infection (P=0.003). More patients receiving FD vs. WBD had TISS <10 ng/mL (P=0.001). Overall, TISS <10 ng/mL early post HCT conferred similar survival outcomes and lowered risk of viral infection and toxicities compared to TISS ≥10 ng/mL.

Immunophenotype of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in minorities- analysis from the SEER database

Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL) is a malignancy that originates from immature lymphoid cells and is clinically established with flow cytometry through disease-specific markers. Variation between ethnic groups is an epidemiological aspect of ALL. Higher incidence rates have been observed in Latin American patients and ALL in Latinos carries a dismal prognosis. The cell of origin in ALL is derived from immature cells of either the B or T lineage. Most reported data among Latinos either exclusively looks at B cell precursor ALL or do not distinguish between subtypes. We used the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to delineate the differences in incidence rates of B-ALL and T-ALL across ethnic groups in the United States. Data from SEER-18 was used to compare incidence rates of T-ALL and B-ALL. Due to the utilization of cytogenetics and subsequent changes in ICD coding over the years examined the most recent data reported from 2002 to 2017. We compared rates in Non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs), Latinos, Blacks and Asian-Pacific Islanders (API). Age-adjusted incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were calculated. The incidence rate of B-ALL in the Latino population was consistently higher than other race/ethnicities throughout the years, ranging from 1.0 per 100,000 in 2002 to 2.5 per 100,000 in 2017. Blacks had the lowest age adjusted incidence rate (AAIR) of B-ALL overall, with rates approximately one third of those found in Latinos and the highest AAIR of T-ALL with an AAIR of 0.5 per 100,000.

Donor derived leukemia in allogeneic transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is a curative option for the treatment of eligible patients with hematological malignancies. This modality confers a risk for life-threatening complications, including the rare and underdiagnosed complication of donor-derived leukemia (DDL). DDL differs from relapse of the original malignancy in that DDL originates from the donor stem cells and is unrelated to the original diagnosis. Because DDL may be the same lineage as the original diagnosis, it is difficult to identify these cases and many remain unrecognized. There is no consensus of how to approach the treatment of patients with DDL, and their prognosis is poor considering that patients with DDL have already been treated for their original leukemia and have undergone alloHCT. DDL occurs following transplants using any donor stem cell source (bone marrow, peripheral blood and cord blood) and any donor type (matched/unmatched, related/unrelated and haploidentical). Both donor and recipient factors contribute to the development of DDL, and a better understanding of these factors is crucial to reduce the risk for the development of DDL. In this review, we provide an overview of DDL, including the incidence, diagnosis, etiology, prognosis, and treatment.

Extramedullary disease relapse and progression after blinatumomab therapy for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Blinatumomab has demonstrated encouraging activity in relapsed/refractory (r/r) and minimal residual disease-positive (MRD+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Extramedullary disease (EMD) relapse or relapse with CD19- disease has been observed after blinatumomab therapy in patients with r/r or MRD+ ALL. However, the pathophysiology and risk factors of treatment failure are not fully understood.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of adult patients with B-cell ALL treated with blinatumomab (n = 132) for either r/r (n = 103) or MRD+ disease (n = 29) at the authors' center (2013-2021) and analyzed factors associated with treatment response and EMD failure.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 64%. A lower marrow blast burden before blinatumomab (P = .049) and no history of previous EMD (P = .019) were significantly associated with a higher response. Among the patients who responded to blinatumomab, 56% underwent consolidation with allogeneic transplantation. Blinatumomab failure was observed in 89 patients; 43% of these patients (n = 38) either progressed or relapsed at extramedullary sites. A history of extramedullary involvement (53% vs 24%; P = .005) and retention of CD19 expression at the time of relapse/progression (97% vs 74%; P = .012) were associated with a higher risk for extramedullary failure. Central nervous system (CNS) failure after blinatumomab was encountered in 39% of the patients with EMD.

CONCLUSIONS

A history of EMD predicted an inferior response to blinatumomab therapy with a higher risk for relapse/progression at extramedullary sites (particularly CNS). Consolidation with allogenic transplantation in patients who primarily responded to blinatumomab did not abrogate the risk of extramedullary relapse. The incorporation of extramedullary assessment and the intensification of CNS prophylaxis may help in addressing extramedullary failure.

LAY SUMMARY

Extramedullary failure is common during blinatumomab therapy for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A history of extramedullary disease predicts an inferior response to blinatumomab therapy and a higher risk for relapse/progression at extramedullary sites. Most extramedullary failure cases retain CD19 expression.

Use of high-dose mesna and hyperhydration leads to lower incidence of hemorrhagic cystitis after posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based allogeneic transplantation

Currently, there is no consensus on best practices to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) in patients receiving posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). We retrospectively reviewed 194 patients undergoing their first hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) who received PTCy from 2014 to 2018 to describe the incidence and severity of HC, identify potential risk factors, and impact of HC on HCT outcomes. Standard HC prophylaxis was hyperhydration with forced diuresis and mesna at 320% the daily dose of PTCy. Incidence of HC was 31.4% at day +100 of HCT. Median onset of HC was 12 days with 11.5% grade 3 HC and no Grade 4 HC. Patients with chemical HC experienced earlier onset (7 days vs. 34 days, p < 0.001) with a shorter median resolution time (5 days vs. 14 days, p = 0.001) when compared to BK-associated HC. In multivariate analysis, age above 60 years (HR 4.16, p = 0.006) and myeloablative conditioning (HR 2.44, p = 0.054) were associated with higher risk for HC, but overall, HC did not affect nonrelapse mortality or overall survival. In conclusion, hyperhydration with forced diuresis combined with aggressive mesna dosing is an effective strategy in preventing severe PTCy-associated HC, subsequently preventing any negative impact on transplant outcome.

Indications for Allogeneic HCT in Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Complete Remission

OPINION STATEMENT

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adults is associated with poor outcomes as compared to children when treated with chemotherapy, leading to a considerably inferior cure rate. Historically, consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) was routinely recommended for eligible adults with ALL in first complete remission (CR1) if a donor was available, since randomized studies showed superiority over continuing chemotherapy. With the increasing use of pediatric-inspired frontline regimens in young adults with ALL and the availability of novel salvage agents for relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL that have high potential in inducing a second CR, the role of early alloHCT in the treatment paradigm for ALL needs to be reevaluated, and the decision should be individualized for each patient. Simultaneously, alloHCT has evolved considerably lately, and historical randomized studies that have proven the benefit of alloHCT in adults with ALL in CR1 did not included the increasing use of reduced intensity conditioning and haploidentical transplants, and therefore, data may not entirely apply. Nowadays, detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) is the most prognostic determinant of ALL outcome and should be a major consideration in the decision to perform alloHcT in CR1. Nonetheless, other biological and clinical factors remain relevant and can support the complex decision-making. Such factors include high-risk leukemia genetics, the type of administered chemotherapy regimen and the ability of the patient to tolerate all key components of the regimen, and the availability of effective salvage therapies that allow alloHCT to be performed in CR2 in case of relapse after chemotherapy.

A phase 1 study of the pan-bromodomain and extraterminal inhibitor mivebresib (ABBV-075) alone or in combination with venetoclax in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous malignancy driven by genetic and epigenetic factors. Inhibition of bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) proteins, epigenetic readers that play pivotal roles in the regulation of genes relevant to cancer pathogenesis, constitutes a novel AML treatment approach.

METHODS

In this first-in-human study of the pan-BET inhibitor mivebresib as monotherapy (MIV-mono) or in combination with venetoclax (MIV-Ven), the safety profile, efficacy, and pharmacodynamics of mivebresib were determined in patients with relapsed/refractory AML (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02391480). Mivebresib was administered at 3 monotherapy dose levels (1.5, 2.0, or 2.5 mg) or in combination with venetoclax (400 or 800 mg).

RESULTS

Forty-four patients started treatment: of 19 who started MIV-mono, 5 went on to receive MIV-Ven combination therapy after disease progression and a washout period. Twenty-five patients started MIV-Ven, resulting in a total of 30 patients treated with the combination. The most common mivebresib-related treatment-emergent adverse events were dysgeusia (74%), decreased appetite (42%), and diarrhea (42%) in the MIV-mono group and decreased appetite (44%), vomiting (44%), and nausea (40%) in the MIV-Ven group. Serious adverse events occurred in 14 patients (74%) who received MIV-mono and in 22 patients (88%) who received MIV-Ven. In the MIV-mono group, responses were complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery in 1 patient and resistant disease in 15 patients. In the MIV-Ven group, responses were complete remission in 2 patients, partial remission in 2 patients, morphologic leukemia-free state in 2 patients, resistant disease in 12 patients, and aplasia in 1 patient. The pharmacodynamic effects of mivebresib were proportional to dose and drug exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Mivebresib was tolerated and showed antileukemic effects as monotherapy and in combination with venetoclax in patients with relapsed/refractory AML.

LAY SUMMARY

Mivebresib is a novel drug that influences the way cancer cells read genetic information. Mivebresib was tested together with venetoclax in patients with acute myeloid leukemia after standard medicines failed and the disease returned, or when standard medicine was unavailable. Adverse effects were described for different drug doses, and the dose that is tolerable was determined. In some patients, their leukemia improved for some time. More studies are necessary to determine whether mivebresib can be used to treat acute myeloid leukemia.

Multi-institutional study evaluating clinical outcome with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after blinatumomab in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: real-world data

Safety and efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) consolidation after blinatumomab is largely undetermined. To address this issue, we assembled multi-center data of relapsed refractory (RR) acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) patients who received alloHCT after blinatumomab. From December 2014 to May 2019, 223 patients who received blinatumomab for RR ALL outside clinical trials were identified. Among them, 106 (47%) patients transplanted post blinatumomab were evaluated for response and toxicity. Ninety-two (87%) patients received alloHCT after achieving CR, while remaining received subsequent salvage prior to undergoing alloHCT. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2 years post alloHCT was 48% (95% CI: 36-59%) and 58% (95% CI: 45-69%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of GIII-IV aGVHD at 3 months was 9.9% (95% CI: 5.0-16.6%). Similarly, cumulative incidence of moderate to severe cGVHD at 2 years was 34.4% (95% CI: 23.7-45.3%). The overall survival at 2 years was not significantly different in patient who achieved CR with MRD negative (68.4% [95% CI: 28.5-89.1%]) compared to CR with MRD positive (63.4% [95% CI: 47.8-75.4%]) prior to alloHCT (p = 0.8). Our real-world analysis suggests that alloHCT is feasible and effective post blinatumomab in patients with RR ALL.

Cytokine gene polymorphisms are associated with response to blinatumomab in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Blinatumomab is a bispecific T cell-engaging antibody approved for treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) ALL, with 40%-50% complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) as a major adverse effect after blinatumomab therapy. Here, we evaluated the possible association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in cytokine genes, disease response, and CRS in r/r ALL patients who received blinatumomab between 2012 and 2017 at our center (n = 66), using patients' archived DNA samples. With a median duration of 9.5 months (range: 1-37), 37 patients (56.1%) achieved CR/CRi, 54 (81.8%) experienced CRS (G1: n = 35, G2: n = 14, G3: n = 5), and 9 (13.6%) developed neurotoxicity. By multivariable analysis, after adjusting for high disease burden, one SNP on IL2 (rs2069762), odds ratio (OR) = 0.074 (95% CI: NE-0.43, P = .01) and one SNP on IL17A (rs4711998), OR = 0.28 (95% CI: 0.078-0.92, P = .034) were independently associated with CR/CRi. None of the analyzed SNPs were associated with CRS. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating a possible association between treatment response to blinatumomab and SNPs. Our hypothesis-generated data suggest a potential role for IL-17 and IL-2 in blinatumomab response and justify a larger confirmatory study, which may lead to personalized blinatumomab immunotherapy for B-ALL.

Venetoclax-containing regimens in acute myeloid leukemia

Venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) has demonstrated exceptional activity in elderly and unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Notably, the safety profile of venetoclax-based induction regimens was favorable, with a low rate of early treatment-related mortality, even in frail study participants. Thus, the introduction of venetoclax has transformed the landscape of AML therapy in elderly patients. Given these promising results, venetoclax in combination with other agents is now being studied as a frontline therapy in younger patients with AML, as well as in relapsed/refractory AML patients. Here, we review clinical data for venetoclax-based therapy in AML, both from prospective as well as retrospective studies, and highlight ongoing novel studies of venetoclax-containing regimens and discuss future research directions.

Flotetuzumab as salvage immunotherapy for refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Approximately 50% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients do not respond to induction therapy (primary induction failure [PIF]) or relapse after <6 months (early relapse [ER]). We have recently shown an association between an immune-infiltrated tumor microenvironment (TME) and resistance to cytarabine-based chemotherapy but responsiveness to flotetuzumab, a bispecific DART antibody-based molecule to CD3ε and CD123. This paper reports the results of a multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 study of flotetuzumab in 88 adults with relapsed/refractory AML: 42 in a dose-finding segment and 46 at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 500 ng/kg per day. The most frequent adverse events were infusion-related reactions (IRRs)/cytokine release syndrome (CRS), largely grade 1-2. Stepwise dosing during week 1, pretreatment dexamethasone, prompt use of tocilizumab, and temporary dose reductions/interruptions successfully prevented severe IRR/CRS. Clinical benefit accrued to PIF/ER patients showing an immune-infiltrated TME. Among 30 PIF/ER patients treated at the RP2D, the complete remission (CR)/CR with partial hematological recovery (CRh) rate was 26.7%, with an overall response rate (CR/CRh/CR with incomplete hematological recovery) of 30.0%. In PIF/ER patients who achieved CR/CRh, median overall survival was 10.2 months (range, 1.87-27.27), with 6- and 12-month survival rates of 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.450-1.05) and 50% (95% CI, 0.154-0.846). Bone marrow transcriptomic analysis showed that a parsimonious 10-gene signature predicted CRs to flotetuzumab (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.904 vs 0.672 for the European LeukemiaNet classifier). Flotetuzumab represents an innovative experimental approach associated with acceptable safety and encouraging evidence of activity in PIF/ER patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02152956.

Tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic determinants of response to blinatumomab in adults with B-ALL

Blinatumomab, a bispecific antibody that directs CD3+ T cells to CD19+ tumor cells, shows variable efficacy in B-progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). To determine tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic determinants of response, we studied 44 adults with relapsed or refractory B-ALL (including 2 minimal residual disease positive) treated with blinatumomab using bulk tumor and single-cell sequencing. The overall response rate in patients with hematological disease was 55%, with a high response rate in those with CRLF2-rearranged Philadelphia chromosome-like ALL (12 [75%] of 16). Pretreatment samples of responders exhibited a tumor-intrinsic transcriptomic signature of heightened immune response. Multiple mechanisms resulted in loss of CD19 expression, including CD19 mutations, CD19-mutant allele-specific expression, low CD19 RNA expression, and mutations in CD19 signaling complex member CD81. Patients with low hypodiploid ALL were prone to CD19- relapse resulting from aneuploidy-mediated loss of the nonmutated CD19 allele. Increased expression of a CD19 isoform with intraexonic splicing of exon 2, CD19 ex2part, at baseline or during therapy was associated with treatment failure. These analyses demonstrate both tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic factors influence blinatumomab response. We show that CD19 mutations are commonly detected in CD19- relapse during blinatumomab treatment. Identification of the CD19 ex2part splice variant represents a new biomarker predictive of blinatumomab therapy failure.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Relapsed and Refractory Philadelphia Negative B Cell ALL in the Era of Novel Salvage Therapies

Introduction of novel salvage therapies and expansion of the donor pool within the past decade have allowed more patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) to receive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). The impact of each salvage therapy on transplant outcomes have not been compared. Our primary objective was to determine post-HCT relapse-free survival (RFS) in adult patients with r/r Philadelphia-chromosome negative (Ph^neg) B-ALL. We retrospectively studied alloHCT outcomes in 108 adult patients with r/r Ph^neg B-ALL transplanted in morphological remission achieved by salvage therapy. Salvage therapies were chemotherapy-based combination (n = 45, 42%), blinatumomab (n=43, 40%), inotuzumab (n = 14, 13%), or CAR T cells (n = 6, 6%). The 2-year RFS and overall survival (OS) were 44% and 50%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, conditioning with reduced-intensity or non-myeloablative regimens (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-3.80; P = .003), having received ≥3 lines of therapies prior to transplant (HR = 2.66, 95% CI, 1.56-4.54; P < .001), and inotuzumab (HR = 2.42, 95% CI, 1.14-5.12; Wald P value = .021) were independently associated with lower RFS. Blinatumomab (HR = 1.10, 95% CI, 0.62-1.96) had comparable RFS to chemotherapy. Incidence of hepatic sinusoidal syndrome was highest with inotuzumab (P < .001); however, 30-day mortality and intensive care unit admissions were not different per salvage therapy. The alloHCT in r/r Ph^neg B-ALL after remission induction with blinatumomab or chemotherapy led to encouraging outcomes if morphologic CR was achieved. In contrast, pretransplantation inotuzumab therapy was associated with inferior RFS. Larger studies are warranted to confirm our observations. Early transplantation after relapse and the utilization of myeloablative conditioning, when feasible, were key factors associated with improved outcomes after alloHCT in these patients.