194 TIA IMAGING: ARE WE FOLLOWING NICE 2020 GUIDELINES?

Background

CT brain imaging is customary in clinical practice after Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA). However, NICE (2020) guidelines recommend MRI brain with diffusion weighted and blood-sensitive sequences; to be completed on the same day as the assessment. The purpose is to detect the ischemic territory, haemorrhage, or other pathology. The aim of this audit was to assess the diagnostic radiology investigations performed on patients, over the age of sixty-five years, presenting with TIA to a university teaching hospital.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective audit of all patients coded as TIA on the Hospital Inpatient-Enquiry (HIPE) system between July 2019 to July 2020. Data on brain imaging was accessed using the National Integrated Medical Imaging System (NIMIS) system. Hospital attendance records were accessed via the Emergency Department patient database. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel.

Results

Eighty patients had brain imaging performed (n = 38 CT brain only; n = 1 MRI only; n = 41 CT and MRI). Of these patients, only three had an MRI brain completed within twenty-four hours where thirty-nine patients had an MRI scans outside of twenty-four hours. Forty-one patients had both a CT and MRI brain imaging performed. The median time to MRI brain was three days and one and a half hours and the median time to CT brain was two hours and forty-nine minutes.

Conclusion

This audit confirms duplication of TIA brain imaging and CT as the primary imaging tool for TIA which is not in keeping with best practice (NICE, 2020). This has implications for resources, radiation exposure and patient’s length of stay. Development of dedicated ambulatory care pathways for TIA must incorporate rapid MRI access as the primary imaging modality.

247 BENCHMARKING STROKE SERVICES TO INFORM A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INIAITIVE

Background

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability in Ireland. Continuous audit and quality improvement is essential in the delivery of stroke care where the evidence basis is constantly changing. This helps to ensure the delivery of high quality stroke care and compliance with evidenced based guidelines. We aimed to assess stroke care at an Irish university teaching hospital.

Methods

Patients with a HIPE discharge diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction or Cerebral Haemorrhage (1st January-31st December 2019) were identified through both the HIPE database and the institutional Stroke Portal. Data was benchmarked against national (Irish National Audit of Stroke 2019) and international (6th SSNAP Annual Report; American Heart Association, 2013) practice and used to inform a quality improvement strategy.

Results

419 patients were included (56.6% male, median 57 years). 75.9% were aged 65 years or older. We compared favourably with Irish National Audit of Stoke national indicators on the following: thrombolysis rates-10%; median door to needle time-60 mins; stroke unit admissions- 78.5%; median duration of symptoms- 3 hours 6 minutes; swallow assessment- 81.1%; in-patient mortality- 10.5%; rates of institutionalisation- 3.8%. Areas identified for improvement were: thrombectomy rates- 1.9%; median length of stay- 12 days; door to imaging time- median 104 minutes; mood screening- 11.5%.

Conclusion

International and national data is a useful benchmark against which local hospitals can assess the quality of their service. By completing this quality improvement initiative we identified areas to target resources in our centre, including mood screening, swallow screening, thrombectomy rates, length of stay and time to neuroimaging. An ongoing quality improvement process using ‘PDSA’ methodology is being carried out with an annual audit to monitor progress.

235 THROMBOLYSIS DOSING AND WEIGHT ESTIMATION IN ACUTE STROKE: A SINGLE CENTRE AUDIT

Background

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability. Thrombolysis with intravenous (IV) alteplase is the mainstay management of ischaemic stroke. It has a narrow therapeutic window with a high potential for adverse outcomes such as intracranial haemorrhage. The efficacy of alteplase is time and dose dependent with weight-based dosing. National clinical guidelines recommend a dose of 0.9 mg/kg, up to a maximum of 90 mg. (Irish Heart Foundation Council for Stroke 2015). In most hospitals in Ireland however, patients are not weighed prior to thrombolysis. Time pressure and lack of available suitable equipment are factors.

Methods

This retrospective clinical audit evaluated the dosing of alteplase, estimated and actual weight for a convenience sample of stroke thrombolysis patients treated between 2016–2020 at an Irish University Teaching Hospital.

Results

107 patients were audited (62 males, 45 females). Actual and estimated weights were available in 92/107. Weight was not documented (n = 15) due to severe stroke/palliative management (n = 6) or omission (n = 9). 21% (19/92) received the correct dose of 0.9 mg/kg. A further 54% (50/92) received a dose within the range of 0.81–0.99 mg/kg (±10%). 25% received a dose outside this range (> ± 10%). 11% (10/92) were under-thrombolysed and 14% (13/92) over-thrombolysed. 17/92 patients had an intracranial haemorrhage. 35% (n = 6/17) of patients who had an intracranial haemorrhage received a higher dose of thrombolysis (>10%).

Conclusion

A quarter of patients received inappropriate dosing of alteplase that was outside the range of ±10% of 0.9 mg/kg. While stroke thrombolysis must be completed urgently, an accurate weight should be determined to avoid errors in dosing. A process evaluation of stroke thrombolysis would provide information on how best to incorporate an objective means of weight measurement without delaying treatment.

246 IMPROVING LUMBAR PUNCTURE TECHNIQUE AMONG INTERN TRAINEES TO ENHANCE QUALITY OF CARE FOR PATIENTS

Background

Lumbar puncture (LP) is a common procedure performed on older adults in acute medical settings. A higher peri-procedural risk has been shown in older patients. Non-consultant doctors (NCHDs) often lack confidence and competence in performing LP. Simulation based training using task trainers has been shown to improve confidence, preplanning skills and technique.

Methods

A simulation based teaching session was developed in a university teaching hospital (training structure was adapted from the LP training guide published in MedEdPortal). Small group teaching (with 6–8 learners) was delivered to 25 NCHDs with no prior exposure or experience with lumbar puncture completion. Trainees completed one LP simulation without practice to mastery level. On-demand and post-performance feedback was delivered to learners. An assessment checklist was completed by the supervisor. Learners completed an anonymised quantitative and qualitative questionnaire using Qualtrics XM software at a later date to evaluate self-perceived teaching outcomes.

Results

16 doctors completed the questionnaire (64% response rate). 55% rated the LP workshop as a ‘strongly positive’ impact on their learning, while 18% indicated a ‘positive’ impact on a 5-point Likert scale. 19% of trainees reported they were ‘very comfortable’ at performing the procedure post training, with 56.5% ‘comfortable’ to perform an LP in their clinical practice. Qualitative learner feedback included ‘more hands on practice’ on the mannequin, ‘smaller groups for the workshops’ and ‘more practice tips’ during the simulation workshop.

Conclusion

This pilot study demonstrated interest and positive feedback for the LP simulation training from novice doctors with improved self-assessed confidence. Formal development of an LP simulation training curriculum is underway. The impact of this training on patient care should be assessed in practice.

236 PREDICTORS OF ADVERSE OUTCOMES IN OLDER PATIENTS DISCHARGED DIRECTLY FROM THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

Background

Over 40% of older patients are discharged directly from the Emergency Department (ED) and this cohort is at increased risk of adverse outcomes.

The purpose of this study was to explore the factors that predict future adverse outcomes in this cohort to inform practice, resource planning and policy.

Methods

A secondary analysis of the OPTIMEND, a single-centre, randomized-controlled trial was completed. OPTIMEND examined the effectiveness of an intervention by a team of Health and Social Care Professionals along with usual care and compared this to standard ED care alone (Dec 2018-May 2019). The inclusion criteria were adults aged 65 years and over presenting to the ED at a University Teaching Hospital with medical complaints and a Manchester Triage System category 2–5.

Results

220 patients were included (median age 79 years; 62% female). Median length of stay in ED was 5.5 hrs. 70 patients re-attended the ED within 6 months with 43 re-hospitalised within 6 months. 9 patients died within six months of discharge.

Multivariant logistic regression was completed. Age was the only independent predictor of mortality within six months of discharge {Odds Ratio (OR) 1.15, p = 0.044}. Past hospitalisation (<6 months) was associated with a lower likelihood of ED re-attendance, and rehospitalization within six months of discharge (OR: 0.452 p = 0.022; OR:0.442, p = 0.046; respectively). Clinical Frailty Score was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of rehospitalization (OR:1.48, p = 0.031) but not with ED revisits (OR: 1.235, p = 0.165).

Conclusion

Older people have a high ED re-attendance rate of 33% after an index visit with 20% hospitalized subsequently. Frailty is a significant predictor of rehospitalisation. Rapid and targeted intervention for frail patients who reattend the ED should be a priority for the integrated care program to enhance admission avoidance.

234 THE IMPACT OF OLDER AGE ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES DURING THE FIRST WAVE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Background

Severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first recorded in Ireland in February 2020. Several studies have explored the association between age and SARS-CoV-2, showing that there were poorer outcomes in older people. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of age on outcomes such as hospital length of stay, mortality, and re-hospitalisation.

Methods

We performed a single-centre, retrospective observational cohort study, using an electronic microbiology database of recorded index admissions of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients aged 65 years and older during SARS-CoV-2 wave one (March 1^st to May 31^st 2020). PCR testing of nasopharyngeal and/or sputum samples was used to confirm positivity. Our clinical outcomes measured included hospital length of stay, mortality and re-admission rate within 6 months.

Results

153 patients 65 years and above were admitted. The male to female ratio was 1.3 with 90% admitted medically. 79 patients were aged between 65–79 years; 84 patients ≥80 years; and 12 patients ≥90 years. Mortality was 25%, 31% and 42%, respectively. Median length of stay remained 14 days for ages 65–89 rising to 17.5 days for those ≥90 years. Re-hospitalisation rates at 6 months were similar for ages 65–79 and 89–89 years at 42% and 40%, respectively. One patient (14%) over 90 years was re-hospitalised.

Conclusion

SARS-CoV-2 has disproportionately impacted on general medical services treating older hospitalised people. In our centre, mortality for patients ≥65 years was 28.1% which compared favourably with 35.6% internationally as outlined by Victor et al. (2020) based on Spanish data. Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 is not futile in older patients with 58% of nonagenarians and 69% of octogenarians surviving, however re-hospitalisation rates are high at 40%. A targeted approach to discharge support via integrated care may ameliorate this.

240 A COMPARISON OF THE ISAR AND THE CLINICAL FRAILTY SCALE TO PREDICT MORTALITY AND ED RE-ATTENDANCE IN OLDER ED ATTENDERS

Background

Frailty Screening is one method by which we can risk stratify older adults to urgent assessment in the Emergency Department. The ISAR (Identification of Seniors at Risk) and Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) are two frailty screening tools. We assessed the validity of these tools at predicting adverse outcomes for older adults presenting to the Emergency Department.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study. Patients over 65 were recruited, baseline demographics were obtained and a research nurse assessed them using both the CFS and ISAR. Patients were assessed by telephone interviews at one month and six months. The outcome measures assessed were mortality, ED re-attendance, hospital readmission, functional decline and institutionalisation.

Results

419 patients were recruited. 53.3% (223) were male with a median age of 76 (IQR = 10). At baseline, the median ISAR was 2 and CFS was 5. The mortality rate was 5.4% and the rate of ED re-attendance was 16.9% at one month. The relative risk of ED re-admission with an ISAR score ≥ 2 was 1.84 (1.12, 3.02) and CFS > 4 was 1.85 (1.08, 3.16). The ISAR tool ≥2 had a sensitivity of 74% (95% CI = 62.44, 83.99) and specificity of 41% (95% CI = 35.90, 46.61) when used as a diagnostic tool for ED re-admission at one month. The CFS > 4 had a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI = 57.79, 82.70) and specificity of 45% (95% CI = 39.33, 51.23) for ED re-attendance.

Conclusion

The ISAR tool ≥2 was more sensitive at predicting ED reattendance at one month in comparison to the CFS. We advocate to use this tool in the ED setting to highlight those at greatest risk of adverse outcomes and those most likely to benefit from Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment.

The concerns of oncology professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the ESMO Resilience Task Force survey II

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant changes to professional and personal lives of oncology professionals globally. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Resilience Task Force collaboration aimed to provide contemporaneous reports on the impact of COVID-19 on the lived experiences and well-being in oncology.

Methods

This online anonymous survey (July-August 2020) is the second of a series of global surveys launched during the course of the pandemic. Longitudinal key outcome measures including well-being/distress (expanded Well-being Index—9 items), burnout (1 item from expanded Well-being Index), and job performance since COVID-19 were tracked.

Results

A total of 942 participants from 99 countries were included for final analysis: 58% (n = 544) from Europe, 52% (n = 485) female, 43% (n = 409) ≤40 years old, and 36% (n = 343) of non-white ethnicity. In July/August 2020, 60% (n = 525) continued to report a change in professional duties compared with the pre-COVID-19 era. The proportion of participants at risk of poor well-being (33%, n = 310) and who reported feeling burnout (49%, n = 460) had increased significantly compared with April/May 2020 (25% and 38%, respectively; P < 0.001), despite improved job performance since COVID-19 (34% versus 51%; P < 0.001). Of those who had been tested for COVID-19, 8% (n = 39/484) tested positive; 18% (n = 7/39) felt they had not been given adequate time to recover before return to work. Since the pandemic, 39% (n = 353/908) had expressed concerns that COVID-19 would have a negative impact on their career development or training and 40% (n = 366/917) felt that their job security had been compromised. More than two-thirds (n = 608/879) revealed that COVID-19 has changed their outlook on their work-personal life balance.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact the well-being of oncology professionals globally, with significantly more in distress and feeling burnout compared with the first wave. Collective efforts from both national and international communities addressing support and coping strategies will be crucial as we recover from the COVID-19 crisis. In particular, an action plan should also be devised to tackle concerns raised regarding the negative impact of COVID-19 on career development, training, and job security.

•

Compared with survey I, more oncology professionals were at risk of poor well-being (33% versus 25%) and burnout (49% versus 38%).

•

Job performance since COVID-19 (JP-CV) has improved from 34% to 51%.

•

About 1 in 5 who tested positive for COVID-19 felt they had not been given adequate time to recover before return to work.

•

Some 39% expressed concerns that COVID-19 would have a negative impact on their career development or training.

•

More than two-thirds revealed that COVID-19 had changed their outlook on work-personal life balance.

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer: evaluating maternal and foetal outcomes. A national study

PURPOSE

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is defined as breast cancer diagnosed during the gestational period (gp-PABC) or in the first postpartum year (pp-PABC). Despite its infrequent occurrence, the incidence of PABC appears to be rising due to the increasing propensity for women to delay childbirth. We have established the first retrospective registry study of PABC in Ireland to examine specific clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and maternal and foetal outcomes.

METHODS

This was a national, multi-site, retrospective observational study, including PABC patients treated in 12 oncology institutions from August 2001 to January 2020. Data extracted included information on patient demographics, tumour biology, staging, treatments, and maternal/foetal outcomes. Survival data for an age-matched breast cancer population over a similar time period was obtained from the National Cancer Registry of Ireland (NCRI). Standard biostatistical methods were used for analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 155 patients-71 (46%) were gp-PABC and 84 (54%) were pp-PABC. The median age was 36 years. Forty-four patients (28%) presented with Stage III disease and 25 (16%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis. High rates of triple-negative (25%) and HER2+ (30%) breast cancer were observed. We observed an inferior 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in our PABC cohort compared to an age-matched breast cancer population in both Stage I-III (77.6% vs 90.9%) and Stage IV disease (18% vs 38.3%). There was a low rate (3%) of foetal complications.

CONCLUSION

PABC patients may have poorer survival outcomes. Further prospective data are needed to optimise management of these patients.

Evolving epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales: one hospital's infection prevention and control response over nine years

BACKGROUND

Preventing carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) transmission is a significant challenge for hospital infection prevention and control teams (IPCTs). Control measures include screening at-risk patients, contact tracing, and the isolation of carriers with contact precautions.

AIM

The evolution of infection prevention and control measures was assessed in a tertiary acute care hospital with predominately multi-bedded patient accommodation, from 2011 to 2019 as cases of CPE increased. The implications for, and the response and actions of, the IPCT were also reviewed.

METHODS

CPE data collected prospectively from our laboratory, IPCT, and outbreak meeting records were reviewed to assess how the IPCT adapted to the changing epidemiology, from sporadic cases, to outbreaks and to localized endemic CPE.

FINDINGS

Of 178 cases, 152 (85%) were healthcare-associated and there was a marked increase in cases from 2017. The number of screening samples tested annually increased from 1190 in 2011 to 16,837 in 2019, and six outbreaks were documented, with larger outbreaks identified in later years. OXA-48 carbapenemase was detected in 88% of isolates and attendance at outbreak meetings alone accounted for 463.5 h of IPCT members, and related staff time.

CONCLUSION

Despite considerable efforts and time invested by the IPCT, the number of CPE cases is increasing year-on-year, with more outbreaks being reported in later years, albeit partly in response to increased screening requirements. Infrastructural deficits, the changing epidemiology of CPE, and national policy are major factors in the increasing number of cases.

The impact of COVID-19 on oncology professionals: results of the ESMO Resilience Task Force survey collaboration

BACKGROUND

The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on well-being has the potential for serious negative consequences on work, home life, and patient care. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Resilience Task Force collaboration set out to investigate well-being in oncology over time since COVID-19.

METHODS

Two online anonymous surveys were conducted (survey I: April/May 2020; survey II: July/August 2020). Statistical analyses were performed to examine group differences, associations, and predictors of key outcomes: (i) well-being/distress [expanded Well-being Index (eWBI; 9 items)]; (ii) burnout (1 item from eWBI); (iii) job performance since COVID-19 (JP-CV; 2 items).

RESULTS

Responses from survey I (1520 participants from 101 countries) indicate that COVID-19 is impacting oncology professionals; in particular, 25% of participants indicated being at risk of distress (poor well-being, eWBI ≥ 4), 38% reported feeling burnout, and 66% reported not being able to perform their job compared with the pre-COVID-19 period. Higher JP-CV was associated with better well-being and not feeling burnout (P < 0.01). Differences were seen in well-being and JP-CV between countries (P < 0.001) and were related to country COVID-19 crude mortality rate (P < 0.05). Consistent predictors of well-being, burnout, and JP-CV were psychological resilience and changes to work hours. In survey II, among 272 participants who completed both surveys, while JP-CV improved (38% versus 54%, P < 0.001), eWBI scores ≥4 and burnout rates were significantly higher compared with survey I (22% versus 31%, P = 0.01; and 35% versus 49%, P = 0.001, respectively), suggesting well-being and burnout have worsened over a 3-month period during the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

In the first and largest global survey series, COVID-19 is impacting well-being and job performance of oncology professionals. JP-CV has improved but risk of distress and burnout has increased over time. Urgent measures to address well-being and improve resilience are essential.

Health-related quality of life in women after colposcopy: results from a longitudinal patient survey

BACKGROUND

Information concerning the health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) consequences of colposcopy is limited, particularly over time. In a longitudinal study, we investigated women's HRQoL at 4, 8 and 12 months post colposcopy and the factors associated with this.

METHODS

Women attending colposcopy at two large hospitals affiliated with the national screening programme in Ireland were invited to complete questionnaires at 4, 8 and 12 months post colposcopy. HRQoL was measured using the EQ-5D-3L and compared across a range of socio-demographic, clinical and attitudinal variables. A mixed-effects logistic multivariable model was employed to investigate associations between these variables and low HRQoL.

RESULTS

Of 584 women initially recruited, 429, 343 and 303 completed questionnaires at 4, 8 and 12 months, respectively. The mean overall HRQoL score for the sample across all time points was 0.90 (SD 0.16). Approximately 18% of women experienced low HRQoL at each of the three time points. In multivariable testing, over the entire 12-month follow-up period, non-Irish nationals (OR 8.99, 95% CI 2.35-34.43) and women with high-grade referral cytology (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.08-7.13) were at higher odds of low HRQoL. Women who were past (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.58) or never (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.16-1.12) smokers were at lower odds of low HRQoL than current smokers. As women's satisfaction with their healthcare increased their odds of experiencing low HRQoL fell (OR per unit increase 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Women's HRQoL did not change over the 12 months post colposcopy, but some subgroups of women were at higher risk of experiencing low HRQoL. These subgroups may benefit from additional support.

33 Diagnostic Test Accuracy of the 4AT for Delirium Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Detection of delirium in hospitalised older adults is recommended in national and international guidelines. The 4 ‘A’s Test (4AT; www.the4AT.com) is a short (&lt;2 min) instrument for delirium detection that is used internationally as a standard tool in clinical practice. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection.

Methods

We searched the following electronic databases through Ovid: MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. Additional databases were searched: CINAHL (EBSCOhost), clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 2011 (4AT publication) until 21 December 2019. Inclusion criteria: older adults (≥65) across any setting of care except critical care; validation study of the 4AT against a delirium reference standard (standard diagnostic criteria or validated tool). Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and papers and performed the data extraction. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were generated from a bivariate random effects model.

Results

17 studies (n = 3,701 observations) were included. Various settings including acute medicine, surgery, stroke wards and the emergency department were represented. The overall prevalence of delirium was 24.2% (95% CI 17.8–32.1%; range 10.5–61.9%). The pooled sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80–0.93) and the pooled specificity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.92). The methodological quality of studies was mostly good.

Conclusions

The 4AT is now supported by a substantial evidence base comparable to other well-studied tools such as the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). The strong pooled sensitivity and specificity findings for the 4AT in this meta-analysis along with its brevity and lack of need for specific training provide support for its use as an effective assessment tool for delirium.

Abstract PS12-25: Patterns of treatment and outcomes in real world patients with advanced estrogen receptor positive breast cancer receiving palbociclib and endocrine therapy

Background: Advancement in the treatment of metastatic estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer has led to the introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors such as Palbociclib, which are associated with reversal of endocrine resistance and delayed requirement for chemotherapy. Clinical trials to date have demonstrated improved survival outcomes for patients on these agents. The objective of this study was to evaluate their role in a real-world setting.

Methods: We performed a retrospective multicentre analysis of patients (pts) with metastatic ER+ breast cancer who were commenced on Palbociclib (PAL) between January 2010 and September 2019. Data extracted included demographics, disease characteristics, treatments, toxicities, response rates and survival outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard model for univariate analysis and Kaplan Meier curves for survival data.

Results: We identified 271 pts. The median age was 60 years (31-88) and 18% (n=48) pts were premenopausal. PAL was combined with the following ET partners: Aromatase inhibitor (AI) (38%, n=103), Fulvestrant (FUL) (38%; n=103), Tamoxifen (4%, n=10), FUL & AI combination (16%, n=44) and other (4%, n=11). Among 71 pts treated in the 1st line, overall response rate (ORR) was 56% (n=40). The median PFS (progression free survival) was 35 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.2-52.7) in all pts and 25 months (mo) in those not treated with FUL. In 1st line pts with de novo disease (37%, n=26), there appeared to be a trend towards improved PFS in the FUL vs non FUL group - not reached vs 25 mo (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.02-1.79, p=0.15). There was no significant difference in PFS between the FUL vs non FUL group in relapsed pts (63%, n=45) treated in the 1st line - 22 vs 20 mo (HR 1.0, 95%CI 0.35-2.9; p=0.96). The median OS was 59 mo (95% CI, 9.5 to 108). Of 74 pts treated in the 2nd line, ORR was 24% (n=18), median PFS was 10 mo (95% CI, 5.8-14.1) & OS was 25 mo (95% CI, 18.3-31.6). Among 126 3rd line pts, ORR was 16% (n=20), median PFS was 5 mo (95% CI, 3.5-6.4) and OS was 20 mo (95% CI, 12.8-27.1). 3 of 9 pts achieved &gt;6 mo of stable disease after switching ET and continuing Palbociclib beyond progression. The most frequent grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (40%), anaemia (4%), fatigue (3%) & thrombocytopenia (2.5%). The rate of febrile neutropenia was 2.5%. Dose reductions occurred in 40%, with the most common reason being neutropenia. Treatment was discontinued in 3% due to toxicity. Premenopausal status or dose reductions were not associated with poorer survival outcomes.

Conclusions: Palbociclib appears to be safe and tolerable in a real-world population and is associated with favourable survival outcomes comparable to that seen in a clinical trial setting. Combining Palbociclib with Fulvestrant as opposed to other endocrine therapies may delay progression in the 1st line setting in patients with de novo metastatic ER+ breast cancer but larger studies are needed to explore this hypothesis further.

Citation Format: Lisa Prior, Darko Skrobo, Hazel Murray, Abdul Rehman Farooq, Anne Horgan, Paula Calvert, Emmet Jordan, John McCaffrey, Lillian Smyth, Miriam O'Connor, Michaela Higgins, Desmond Carney, Janice Walshe, Giuseppe Gullo, John Crown, Catherine M Kelly. Patterns of treatment and outcomes in real world patients with advanced estrogen receptor positive breast cancer receiving palbociclib and endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS12-25.

Carbapenemase screening in an Irish tertiary referral hospital: Best practice, or can we do better?

BACKGROUND

Carbapenems are a family of end line antibiotics with increasing levels of resistance that are a cause for concern.

AIM

To ascertain whether the CPE screening programme employed in an acute tertiary hospital is fit for purpose.

METHOD

We outlined the current working algorithm employed using a universal screening programme over a 26-month screening period. Rectal swabs are cultured on arrival. Those with suspicious growth are further investigated using NG-Carba 5 lateral flow tests and Vitek 2.0 sensitivity cards. These practices were compared with NHS guidelines.

FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS

In all, 53 true positives were detected from 45 patients since the screening was implemented in early 2018 (46 OXA-48, 6 KPC, 1 NDM). As the rate of screening increased, the number of positive screens decreased over time. There were a lot of similarities between the HSE guidelines and the published NHS CPE toolkit. It was evident that there is no standard practice being employed across all hospitals. Comparing the MUH to national guidelines it appears to be quicker and more effective with universal screening in place at reducing the potential contacts and identifying carriers. Cost analysis indicates that the need to confirm all positive strains in a reference lab is costly, unnecessary and time consuming. There are adequate confirmatory tests available in-house for routine positive screens. It was concluded that infection prevention and control are key to identifying and controlling possible outbreaks in a hospital setting.

3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience

Introduction

Simulation forms a key element of undergraduate Radiography education as it enables students to develop their clinical skills in a safe environment. In this study, an immersive three-dimensional (3D) virtual radiography simulation tool was piloted in an undergraduate Radiography curriculum and user feedback retrieved.

Methods

The 3D virtual simulation tool by Virtual Medical Coaching Ltd was introduced to first year radiography students (n = 105). This technology guided students through a comprehensive process of learning anatomy, radiographic positioning and pathology. Students then X-rayed a virtual patient in the VR suite using HTC Vive Pro™ headsets and hand controllers. Instant feedback was provided. An online survey was later disseminated to students to gather user feedback. Thematic and descriptive statistical analyses were applied.

Results

A response rate of 79% (n = 83) was achieved. Most respondents (58%) reported enjoying VR simulation, whilst some felt indifferent towards it (27%). Ninety-four percent would recommend this tool to other students. The mean length of time it took for students to feel comfortable using the technology was 60 min (10–240 min). Most respondents (58%) desired more VR access. Students attributed enhanced confidence in the areas of beam collimation (75%), anatomical marker placement (63%), centring of the X-ray tube (64%) and exposure parameter selection (56%) to their VR practice. Many students (55%) advocated the use of VR in formative or low stakes assessments. Issues flagged included technical glitches, inability to palpate patient and lack of constructive feedback.

Conclusion

Student feedback indicates that 3D virtual radiography simulation is a valuable pedagogical tool in radiography education

Implications for practice

3D immersive VR simulation is perceived by radiography students to be a valuable learning resource. VR needs to be strategically implemented into curricula to maximise its benefits.

Barriers and facilitators to discussing HPV with head and neck cancer patients: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of human papillomavirus-associated head and neck cancers (HPV-HNC) is increasing worldwide. Research in other clinical contexts has shown that healthcare professionals (HCPs) can find discussing HPV with patients challenging. However, limited research has been conducted in HNC. This study aimed to investigate barriers and facilitators to, discussing HPV among HCPs caring for patients with HNC in Ireland.

METHODS

Semi-structured telephone/face-to-face interviews were conducted with HCPs. Barriers and facilitators to discussing HPV with patients were identified using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).

RESULTS

20 HCPs (8 clinicians, 3 nurses, 9 allied healthcare professionals) were interviewed. Barriers to discussing HPV included professionals' lack of HPV knowledge, difficulties in talking about sexual issues with patients and lack of privacy to discuss HPV in busy clinic settings. Facilitators included increasing public and patient awareness of the link between HPV and HNC and professional education and skills development.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first theoretically informed study to identify barriers and facilitators to discussing HPV with HNC patients. HCPs consider HPV discussions to be an essential part of HNC patient care.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Understanding the issues associated with patient-provider HPV communication will help develop effective interventions to support HCPs in their HPV discussions.

Communicating about HPV in the context of head and neck cancer: A systematic review of quantitative studies

OBJECTIVE

Rising incidence of HPV-positive head and neck cancers (HPV-HNC) means HPV infection is increasingly relevant to patient-provider consultations. We performed a systematic review to examine, in the context of patient-provider HNC consultations: discussions about HPV, attitudes towards discussing HPV and information needs.

METHODS

We searched Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL + for studies to August 2018. Eligible studies included: HNC healthcare professionals (HCPs) and/or HNC patients investigated HNC patient-provider communication about HPV.

RESULTS

Ten studies were identified: six including HCPs and four including HNC patients. HCPs varied in confidence in HPV discussions, which was related to their HPV knowledge. Both HCPs and patients acknowledged the need for reliable HPV information. Factors which facilitated HPV discussions included accessible HPV information for patients and HCPs and good HPV knowledge among HCPs. Barriers included the perception, among HCPs, that HPV was a challenging topic to discuss with patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Information deficits, communication challenges and barriers to discussing HPV were identified in HNC patient-provider consultations.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Appropriate HPV information is needed for HCPs and patients. Professional development initiatives which increase HCPs' HPV knowledge and build their communication skills would be valuable.