The 90s paradox: QA efforts reduce total quality

The focus on "closing the window" of infectious risks in transfusion has concentrated limited health care resources on marginal increases in blood safety in the name of quality assurance (QA). Significant investments in testing and medical history additions have been made to restrict further any release of unsuitable blood and apheresis donations. As funds are used in a disproportionate manner with regard to these quality benefits, the depletion of resources precludes investment in quality enhancements (e.g. potency) other than safety, and actually may reduce quality over all. Although safety is an important element of quality, it is not the only element. Increasingly, blood center customers expect, but are unwilling to pay for, limited increases in product safety, such as anti-HCV 3.0 and HIV p24 antigen testing; they should be encouraging improved potency and efficacy for QA. In the future, blood service providers must demonstrate the value of additional QA activities--otherwise, they will not receive reimbursement. Total quality remains the objective goal. However, the investment in QA efforts must yield a benefit equal to, or greater than, investment in the quality assurance process.

Consent for transfusion: is it informed?

Informed consent for transfusions presumes that the patient has been "informed," meaning they have been given sufficient information to make an intelligent choice, and that they "consent," meaning that the patient is competent and free to consent. Although this may be oral or written, the latter is preferable for documentation and legal proof. This may either be as a chart note, or form. In any case, the informed transfusion recipient should be given a description of the procedure in lay terms, told of the expected benefit, including the outcome without the transfusion, and what reasonably foreseeable adverse consequences may occur. The individual should have the opportunity to ask questions of the physician performing the informed consent process. There should be time to provide the information and a discussion; and the patient must be able to comprehend all of this. If this process is performed by the physician talking to his/her patient, then, the patient is likely to be informed about, and consent to, elective transfusions. Once obtained and documented, that consent should be presumed to be valid with a course of therapy for transfusions. If some event significantly changes some aspects of the information on which the patient relied in consenting and now should be aware of, then, the patient should again give consent for transfusion, after being informed of this new information.

Prevalence of and risk factors for antibody to hepatitis E virus seroreactivity among blood donors in Northern California

To evaluate antibody to hepatitis E virus (anti-HEV) seroreactivity, 5000 US blood donors were tested for anti-HEV by two EIAs: a mosaic protein assay (MPr-EIA) and a recombinant protein assay (RPr-EIA). Overall, 59 (1.2%) were seroreactive by MPr-EIA and 70 (1.4%) were seroreactive by RPr-EIA. The overall concordance between tests was 98.5% (4925/5000); the concordance among reactive sera by either test was only 27% (27/102). In a case-control study, seroreactive persons were more likely than seronegative persons to have traveled to countries in which HEV is endemic (odds ratio [OR] for MPr-EIA = 4.3, P < .001; OR for RPr-EIA = 2.5, P = .005), but 31% of MPr-EIA anti-HEV-reactive persons and 38% of RPr-EIA anti-HEV-reactive persons had no history of international travel. These findings suggest that travelers to regions in which HEV is endemic can acquire subclinical HEV infection. The significance of anti-HEV seroreactivity among persons without an international travel history needs to be determined.

Comprehensive reimbursement model: an alternative to fee-for-service reimbursement by blood centers

"If we could first know where we are, and whither we are tending, we could then better judge what to do and how to do it." This quote from Abraham Lincoln epitomizes where SMF and its CRM hospital customers are today. The CRM has been received by SMF's hospital customers as a step in the right direction. Currently, it seems to be the best way to partner with hospitals by sharing risk in the current health care delivery system milieu. The CRM focus on patient outcomes will provide hospitals and blood centers a common goal. Modifications to the CRM will most certainly be necessary. With input from customers and the community over time, and flexibility from SMF, a revised model will evolve that will be even more mutually beneficial.

Genotyping hepatitis C virus isolates from Spain, Brazil, China, and Macau by a simplified PCR method

An improved and simplified method of genotyping was developed for classifying hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates into the five common genotypes, i.e., I/1a, II/1b, III/2a, IV/2b, and V/3a, by PCR with genotype-specific primers deduced from the core gene. Sense and antisense primers, specific for each of the five common genotypes, were designed by comparison of 319 core gene sequences from HCV isolates of various genotypes from genetic groups 1 to 9. In the first round of PCR, a sequence of 433 bp representing nucleotides 319 to 751 was amplified with universal primers. The second round of PCR was performed with respective sense and antisense primers in two separate reactions, one for the amplification of genotypes I/1a and II/1b and the other for the amplification of genotypes III/2a, IV/2b, and V/3a. The specificity of genotyping was confirmed with a panel of 191 serum samples containing HCV isolates whose core gene sequences were known: 110 serum samples infected with HCV of the five common genotypes and 81 serum samples infected with HCV of other genotypes. The use of sense and antisense primers for genotype II/1b (primers 389 and 492) abolished the cross-reaction of the antisense primer for genotype II/1b (primer 133) with some HCV isolates of genotype I/1a found by our original method. The new method was used for genotyping 130 HCV isolates from Spain, 53 from Brazil, 106 from China, and 30 from Macau. A total of 329 bp of the NS5b region (nucleotides 8279 to 8607) of five isolates from Spain and five isolates from Macau which could not be classified as any of the five common HCV genotypes or genotype 2c were sequenced, and the sequences were compared with those of HCV isolates of known genotypes; two isolates from Spain were deduced to be of genotype 4d and one was deduced to be of genotype 1d, while the remaining two isolates from Spain had novel genotypes in genetic group 2; however, all five isolates from Macau were of genotype 6a.

A second-generation method of genotyping hepatitis C virus by the polymerase chain reaction with sense and antisense primers deduced from the core gene

A second-generation method of genotyping hepatitis C virus (HCV) was developed by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with sense as well as antisense primers deduced from the core gene. HCV RNA specimens extracted from sera were reverse-transcribed and amplified with universal primers in the first round of PCR to obtain fragments of 433 base pairs representing nucleotides 319-751. In the second round of PCR, portions of PCR products were amplified separately with sense and antisense primers specific for each of the five common genotypes prevailing across the world, i.e., I/1a, II/1b, III/2a, IV/2b and V/3a. The specificity of the method was verified by a panel of 177 HCV isolates of various genotypes in the genetic groups 1-9. It allowed clear differentiation of genotype I/1a from II/1b which was not always accomplished by the previous method. When 501 sera from blood donors and hepatitis patients with HCV viremia from various countries were genotyped by the second-generation method, 478 (95.4%) were classified into the five genotypes. HCV RNA samples from 23 (4.6%) sera were not classifiable into any of the five common genotypes and, by sequence analysis, 22 were found to be of four genotypes in group 4 and one of genotype 1c in Simmond's classification.

Changes in peripheral blood CD5 (Bla) B-cell populations and autoantibodies following blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

CD5 B cells and the natural autoantibodies they produce play a role in antigen presentation, tolerance induction, and maintenance of an idiotypic immune network. The effects of transfusion on autoantibodies and peripheral blood CD5 B cells were studied.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Eight previously transfused patients with sickle cell anemia and five patients who underwent orthopedic surgical procedures with transfusion were enrolled in the study. Patients in both groups received 1 to 2 units of allogeneic packed red cells. Ten untransfused healthy adults and five patients who underwent orthopedic surgery without transfusion were enrolled as controls. Peripheral blood CD5 B cells, serum levels of IgM, antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, and anticardiolipin IgM were quantitated either at the beginning of the study (baseline sample), before transfusion, or before surgery and either at 1-, 2-, 4-, 6-, and 8-week intervals after transfusion, after surgery, or after the baseline sample was obtained.

RESULTS

IgM levels and the absolute number of B cells that coexpressed CD5 rose to twice pretransfusion levels in six of eight transfused sickle cell anemia patients and in four of five transfused orthopedic surgery patients. No comparable increases in CD5 B cells were noted in untransfused controls. Preexisting rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibody levels increased in four of five transfused orthopedic surgery patients. One sickle cell anemia patient developed anti-Fya despite receiving Fya-negative blood. Increasing titers of anti-Fya paralleled the increases in IgM and CD5 B cells after transfusion. One patient who developed a positive direct antiglobulin test after transfusion had large increases in serum anticardiolipin IgM. Anticardiolipin IgM was subsequently eluted from direct antiglobulin test-positive red cells obtained after transfusion. Antibodies with anti-Fya-like activity and anticardiolipin IgM were produced in vitro by CD5 B cells and not by conventional CD5-negative B cells.

CONCLUSION

An association was found between transfusion-induced increases in CD5 B cells and increased autoantibody production. These data may have implications for immunologic intervention to prevent the induction of red cell antibodies and other changes in the immune system caused by exposure to foreign antigens via blood transfusion.

Comparison of two second-generation anti-hepatitis C virus ELISA on 21431 US blood donor samples

We have compared two different second-generation (2.0) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for the presence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in blood from volunteer, unpaid donors. At two separate blood centres, a total of 21,431 donor samples were tested with Abbott Anti-HCV 2.0 ELISA and Ortho Anti-HCV 2.0 ELISA. Samples found to be repeatedly reactive were tested by supplemental/investigational assays. MATRIX HCV (Abbott) and anti-HCV RIBA II (Ortho/Chiron), to 'confirm' the presence of anti-HCV. Discordant ELISA samples were additionally tested by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the presence of HCV RNA. The Abbott anti-HCV assay had a repeatedly reactive rate of 0.59% (127/21,431) and the Ortho anti-HCV assay 0.51% (110/21,431). Overall agreement between assays was 99.76%, 72/127 (56.7%) of Abbott repeatedly reactive samples confirmed on MATRIX and 61/127 (48.0%) on RIBAII; 70/110 (63.6%) of Ortho repeatedly reactivate samples confirmed on MATRIX and 61/110 (55.5%) on RIBA II. Discordant ELISA samples tested by PCR yielded negative results. Hence the two ELISA had equal sensitivity, as defined by detection of true positive samples; the slightly lower specificity of the Abbott Anti-HCV 2.0 ELISA may be owing to culling of donors with a false positive test by Ortho's Anti-HCV 1.0 and 2.0 ELISA tests (the routine tests in place at each blood centre). A sample found to be repeatedly reactive by two different ELISA tests for anti-HCV is likely to be a true positive and may not require further 'confirmatory' testing.

Evidence that use of a second-generation hepatitis C antibody assay prevents additional cases of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis

The aim of this study was to determine if using hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) enzyme immunoassay version 2.0 (EIA2) in addition to version 1.0 (EIA1) increased the safety of the blood supply. Blood non-reactive by anti-HCV EIA1 was transfused in 1990-92. Stored samples from 40098 units, donated prior to 13 March 1992 were later tested by EIA2. For donor units reactive for anti-HCV by EIA2, a recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA2) was also carried out. In 63 cases, recipients of transfusions which were EIA2 negative or EIA2 reactive were tested for anti-HCV and elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels 9-12 months after transfusion; pretransfusion anti-HCV status of recipients was unknown. Among these multitransfused patients receiving units that were negative by both EIA1 and EIA2, 1/26 (4%) had anti-HCV. Among transfusion recipients of units negative by EIA1, but who received at least one unit reactive by EIA2, 4/37 recipients (11%) were anti-HCV reactive (P = 0.59). For the recipients of EIA2 reactive blood, when the donor unit was RIBA2 non-reactive, 0/23 recipients were reactive by anti-HCV. Among the recipients of a RIBA2 indeterminate unit, 1/10 recipients had anti-HCV, but for patients who received at least one RIBA2 reactive unit, 3/4 recipients had anti-HCV (P = 0.03). Hence, second-generation anti-HCV testing detected additional units capable of transmitting hepatitis C that were not detected by first-generation testing. However, RIBA2 is a more specific method than EIA2 for determining units capable of transmitting HCV.

Circannual variation in lymphocyte subsets, revisited

BACKGROUND

Circadian and circannual variations in lymphocyte subsets, especially CD8+ T-lymphocytes, have been reported. This study focuses on CD4+ T-lymphocyte seasonal variation over a 6-year 8-month period.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Lymphocyte subsets were quantitated monthly for four healthy individuals from 1986 through 1992 as part of a flow cytometry quality-control program.

RESULTS

In general, there were no significant seasonal changes in the total number of white cells or in total lymphocyte counts. The absolute numbers of CD4+ T-lymphocytes were lowest in summer when the CD8+ T-lymphocytes were highest. Mean CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts were 846, 967, 618, and 695 per microL for Subjects 1 through 4, respectively, in winter and 432, 670, 355, and 766 per microL, respectively, in summer. Two healthy subjects had CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts lower than 300 per microL on one or more occasions during the study period. In three of the four subjects, the percentage of B-lymphocytes in winter was almost double that in summer. In one of the four subjects, no circannual rhythm was observed in these lymphocyte subpopulations.

CONCLUSION

The seasonal variation in CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts demonstrated in three healthy individuals over almost 7 years is again of interest in light of renewed consideration of using surrogate tests, such as CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts, to screen for AIDS-like diseases that may be in the blood supply.

Overview: diagnostic tests for viral infections transmitted by blood

The risk of transmitting viral infections by transfusion today is quite remote. The many, sensitive, diagnostic tests in place, when applied to the blood of volunteer, unpaid (unremunerated), unpressured donors who are also carefully evaluated at the time of donation, make blood and blood component transfusions very safe. A number of sensitive laboratory tests are performed on each unit of donated blood and plasma to reduce the risk of transmission of hepatitis viruses and retroviruses from asymptomatic donors to transfusion recipients. With the tests, we hope to catch otherwise undetectable individuals who may be carrying these viruses yet appear healthy and deny risk factors for their carriage. However, the laboratory tests in use in blood banks were designed to aid in the diagnosis of patients with viral diseases. Therefore, a reactive test, even if reproducible, on a sample from a healthy blood donor is more apt to be falsely than truly positive. An ideal microbiologic test is one which is one hundred percent sensitive, i.e., it will identify every person with an infectious disease (including asymptomatic carriers). In addition, a perfect test would have one hundred percent specificity, i.e., it would not be reactive in anyone without the infectious agent. The decision point or "cutoff" for an ideal test would be above the (negative) results for all normal and uninfected samples, but below that for all (positive) infectious ones. In reality, there is an overlap between some of the results on normals and those on diseased individuals, including persons who are carrying an infectious agent. When we try to obtain maximal sensitivity, e.g., to detect all asymptomatic carriers of a virus, the assay cutoff is set very low for tests applied to blood donors; but this approach will compromise the specificity of a test. The net effect is that many normal people donating blood are said to have "abnormal" test results which, among other things, necessitates the loss of their blood and plasma. In addition, we must follow up the reactive results by enzyme linked immunoassays (EIA or ELISA) or radioimmunoassays (RIA) used to screen or preliminarily test blood from donors with supplemental or confirmatory tests to verify whether the initial test is a true positive or a false positive one. Trying to explain the significance of a false positive test for AIDS or hepatitis to a healthy donor often causes fear, concern and/or anger. Thus, the use of very sensitive tests on blood donors will increase the safety of transfusion for recipients but result in loss of some donors and discard of many blood components unnecessarily. Despite the problems in applying sensitive tests to asymptomatic individuals who are not patients, the assays in place in blood banks have, nonetheless, resulted in remarkably small risks of virus transmission by transfusions. Currently, the risk of HCV infection following a transfusion is about 1 in 3,300 per unit transfused. This is an enormous improvement compared to the risks of what was called non-A, non-B hepatitis in the 1970s and 1980s before the use of the test for antibodies to HCV. For HTLV-1 (and, potentially, HTLV-II) the risk of transfusion transmission is about 1 in 50,000 per unit of screened blood. Using blood which is anti-HIV-1/2 non-reactive, the risk is about 1 in 225,000 units of transmitting HIV. The risk of transfusion associated AIDS is thus quite remote in 1993. For hepatitis B virus, only about 1 in 200,000 units of blood transmit this virus now. In sum, only about 3 units of blood per 10,000 of those collected from acceptable, volunteer donors are currently likely to transmit a serious or fatal transfusion-transmitted viral infection. In contrast, in America, about 6 out of every 1,000 patients hospitalized will die from an accidental or preventable cause other than the underlying disease for which he/she was hospitalized. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Seronegative hepatitis C virus liver failure following transplantation of a cadaveric heart

Images

Screening of blood donors for idiopathic CD4+ T-lymphocytopenia

BACKGROUND

The recent recognition of idiopathic CD4+ T-lymphocytopenia (ICL) had led to concern that an unknown immunodeficiency virus may be transmissible by transfusion.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To evaluate the prevalence and significance of low CD4+ values among blood donors, CD4+ data on 2030 blood donors who were negative for antibody to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) were compiled. Those with CD4+ values below ICL cutoffs (< 300 CD4+ T cells/microL, or < 20% CD4+ T cells) were recalled for follow-up investigations. Serial CD4+ data on 55 homosexual men who seroconverted during prospective follow-up and data on 139 anti-HIV-1-positive blood donors initially evaluated in 1986 were reviewed as well.

RESULTS

Five seronegative donors (0.25%) had absolute CD4+ counts < 300 cells per microL and/or < 20 percent. On follow-up, all five donors had immunologic findings within normal ranges, lacked HIV risk factors, and tested negative for HIV types 1 and 2 and human T-lymphotropic virus type I and II infections by antibody and polymerase chain reaction assays. Four of five donors reported transient illness shortly after their low CD4+ count donations. The median interval from HIV-1 seroconversion to an initial CD4+ value below ICL CD4+ cutoffs was 63 months for infected homosexual men. Of 139 HIV-1-infected blood donors studied 1 to 2 years after seropositive donations, 34 (24%) had CD4+ counts < 300 cells per microL and/or < 20 percent.

CONCLUSION

Low CD4+ counts are rare among anti-HIV-1-negative volunteer blood donors and are generally associated with transient illnesses. If any unknown virus progresses similarly to HIV-1, CD4+ count donor screening would be a poor surrogate for its detection.

Peripheral-blood mononuclear cell responses to recombinant hepatitis C virus antigens in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferative responses in vitro to recombinant yeast or Escherichia coli hepatitis C virus fusion proteins were evaluated in 20 patients with chronic hepatitis C who were reactive for antibody to hepatitis C virus (on enzyme immunoassay, version 2.0, and a four-antigen recombinant immunoblot assay). Twenty age-matched, healthy individuals negative for antibody to hepatitis C virus were used as a control group. Peripheral-blood mononuclear cells from all chronic hepatitis C patients with antibodies to hepatitis C virus antigens c22 and c100-3 proliferated in vitro in response to the corresponding recombinant hepatitis C virus fusion protein. Peripheral-blood mononuclear cells from 75% of patients infected with hepatitis C virus proliferated in response to cytidine monophosphate-keto-3-deoxyoctulosonic acid-core recombinant antigen but there was no proliferative response to cytidine monophosphate-keto-3-deoxyoctulosonic acid-EF (derived from the NS5 region). All hepatitis C virus-infected patients had 33c antibody, but peripheral-blood mononuclear cells from only 9 of 14 (64%) proliferated in vitro in response to 33c. Ninety-five percent of all hepatitis C virus-infected patients had peripheral-blood mononuclear cells that proliferated in response to at least one recombinant hepatitis C virus fusion protein. The numbers and percentages of CD3 T cells, CD19 B cells and natural killer cells from patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection did not differ from those in the healthy control group. However, the number of non-major histocompatibility complex-restricted cytotoxic T cells (CD3-positive, CD56-positive, CD16-positive) was increased in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection (p < 0.05).

Elevated levels of serum mucin-associated antigen in adult patients with cystic fibrosis

Previous studies using the CA 19-9 antibody have demonstrated that serum mucin levels in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are elevated and that the degree of elevation relates to the age of the patient and possibly to his or her clinical status. However, CA 19-9 only recognizes the mucin-associated blood group sialyl Le(a+) antigen, so mucin levels cannot be measured in patients without Lewis antigens. The present study used the 17B1 monoclonal antibody to measure serum mucin levels in normal subjects, and in patients with CF, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and patients with lung transplants. Serum mucin levels were 25 ng/ml (+/- 1 SEM, n = 8) in normal subjects, 13,853 ng/ml (+/- 1,281, n = 25) in patients with CF, and 25.5 ng/ml (+/- 1.9, n = 17) in patients with COPD. Patients with CF who were sialyl Le(a-b-) also had elevated serum mucin levels (715 +/- 152, n = 2). Serum mucin levels of six lung transplant recipients with CF were elevated compared with those in normal subjects (4,621 +/- 765 ng/ml), but they were not different from serum mucin levels in six lung transplant recipients without CF (5,307 +/- 1.677 ng/ml). Preliminary characterization of the serum mucin antigen showed that: (1) in CF sera, the antigen is polydisperse and smaller than the antigen in normal sera; (2) the mucin antigen is distinct from ABO blood group antigens. Serum mucin levels may be a useful marker to follow a specific patient's response to therapy.

Evidence of hepatitis in patients receiving transfusions of blood components containing antibody to hepatitis C

When hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV) enzyme immunoassay (EIA1) testing became available in 1990, we tested samples from previously transfused blood units, traced the recipients of reactive units, and evaluated the recipients for HCV infection during the 12 months after transfusion. Ten of 42 recipients of EIA1-reactive blood were anti-HCV reactive on follow-up by EIA1 and 12 were reactive by a second-generation assay (EIA2). Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detected HCV RNA in 5 seronegative recipients. In all, 17 of 42 recipients (40%) of EIA1-reactive blood had evidence of HCV infection. In comparison, 54 surgery patients, who received either no transfusion or autologous EIA1-nonreactive blood, remained EIA1 nonreactive and RT-PCR negative for 1 year; 1 patient (1.8%) became EIA2 reactive (P < or = .01). Of the recipients of anti-HVC reactive blood transfusions (reactive by both EIA1 and a supplemental 4-antigen strip immunoblot assay [RIBA2]), 14 (93%) of the recipients had evidence of HCV infection compared with only 3 of 27 recipients (11%) of EIA1-reactive, RIBA2-nonreactive blood (P < or = .01). Thus, blood components reactive for anti-HCV EIA1 may have transmitted HCV up to 40% of the time, but blood components found reactive by both EIA1 and RIBA2 may transmit HCV with a frequency of greater than 90%.

Significance of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen in blood donors as determined by their serologic response to hepatitis B vaccine

Because large numbers of volunteer blood donors may be disqualified for "false-positive" results on tests for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), a more specific definition of anti-HBc enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-reactive was evaluated, including only those donor samples that were "strongly" reactive (sample-to-cutoff absorbance ratio, < 0.45). Results using this definition and other anti-HBc test methods were compared to the serologic response (antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen [anti-HBsAg]) to hepatitis B vaccination. Fifty-eight volunteer blood donors who had previously been deferred as donors, because of reactive anti-HBc tests (all other blood screening tests were negative, including those for HBsAg and anti-HBsAg) on two occasions, were vaccinated for hepatitis B. It was assumed that an anamnestic response to vaccine indicated past infection with hepatitis B, while a primary response to vaccine indicated lack of past infection. One (2%) of 43 donors with a historically "weak" anti-HBc (reactive absorbance ratio, > or = 0.45) had an anamnestic response to vaccine, compared to 8 (53%) of 15 with historically "strong" anti-HBc (reactive absorbance ratio, < 0.45) (p < 0.005). Anti-HBc testing using the microparticle EIA method also correlated well with hepatitis B vaccination results. The use of a narrower definition of "reactive" for anti-HBc EIA testing yielded much more specific, but slightly less sensitive, results.

Experiences of the first 493 unrelated marrow donors in the National Marrow Donor Program

More than 410,000 people participated in the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) as of October 1, 1991, and more than 850 volunteers had donated marrow. While the incidence of serious morbidity as a result of bone marrow donation is rare, the incidence of lesser complications and the long-term consequences of marrow donation are not known. To determine the incidence of donor complications and measure the recovery time of volunteer, unrelated marrow donors, we analyzed the results of surveys of the first 493 persons who donated marrow through the NMDP. The marrows were collected at 42 centers. The median age of the donors was 37.9 years (range 19.1 to 55.6 years). The median volume of marrow collected was 1,050 mL (range 180 to 2,983 mL). Autologous red blood cells were transfused to 89.8% (439) of donors but only 0.6% (3) of donors received allogeneic blood. Acute complications related to the collection procedure occurred in 5.9% of donors; but a serious complication, apnea during anesthesia, occurred in only one donor. When donors were questioned approximately 2 days following discharge from their hospitalization, most donors described symptoms related to the collection; 74.8% experienced tiredness, 67.8% experienced pain at the marrow collection site, and 51.6% of the donors experienced low back pain. Donors were surveyed repeatedly until they felt that they had recovered completely. Mean recovery time was 15.8 days; however, 42 (10%) donors felt that it took them > or = 30 days to recover fully. The duration of the marrow collection procedure and duration of anesthesia both positively correlated with donor pain and/or fatigue following the collection; but the duration of the collection procedure had the highest correlation with post-collection pain and fatigue. The volume of marrow collected per unit of donor weight was more weakly correlated with donor pain and/or fatigue than the anesthesia and collection times. When multivariate analysis was used to analyze the correlation between donor recovery time and these variables, only the duration of the collection was found to correlate significantly with donor recovery time (P = .001). This analysis demonstrates that marrow donation is well tolerated with few complications. To decrease further the incidence of donor discomfort and recovery time following donation, the duration of the collection procedure, and probably the duration of anesthesia, and the volume of marrow collected, should be kept to a minimum.

Hepatitis C virus in blood samples from volunteer donors

The specificities of four assays for hepatitis C virus (HCV) were compared by using units from volunteer blood donors. Upon Food and Drug Administration licensure of the first immunoassay for anti-HCV, EIA-1, units previously deemed acceptable for transfusion and all subsequent blood donations were screened. EIA-1 repeat-reactive (RR) units were tested for HCV by a second-generation enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA-2) and by a four-antigen recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA II) and for HCV RNA by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. All HCV RNA-positive samples were reactive by both RIBA II and EIA-2. All RIBA II-reactive sera were EIA-2 RR. In EIA-1, 0.45% of the prescreened units and 0.59% of the prospectively screened donors were RR. Of these, 52.5 and 54%, respectively, were EIA-2 RR, 71.4 and 69% of the EIA-2 RR units were reactive on RIBA II, and 93 and 88% of the RIBA II-reactive samples were HCV RNA positive. When the sample/cutoff ratio for EIA-2 was greater than 5, 91% of the samples were RIBA II reactive and 82% of the samples were HCV RNA positive. None of EIA-2 RR units with a sample/cutoff ratio of < 5 was RIBA II reactive or HCV RNA positive. In conclusion, RIBA II and RT PCR results are highly concordant. A sample/cutoff ratio of > 5 in EIA-2 is a good discriminator for the likelihood of a true HCV infection on the basis of RT PCR and RIBA II assays.