Sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare metal stent in diabetic patients: the final five-year follow-up of the DIABETES trial

AIMS

The DIABETES (DIABETes and sirolimus-Eluting Stent) trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial aimed at demonstrating the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) as compared to bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in diabetic patients. The aim of the present analysis was to assess the five-year clinical follow-up of the patients included in this trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and sixty patients (222 lesions) were included: 80 patients were randomised to SES and 80 patients to BMS. Patients were eligible for the study if they were identified as non-insulin-dependent diabetics (NIDDM) or insulin-dependent diabetics (IDDM), with significant native coronary stenoses in ≥1 vessel. There was a sub-randomisation according to diabetes status. Clinical follow-up was extended up to five years. Five-year clinical follow-up was obtained in 96.2%. Overall, MACE at five years was significantly lower in the SES group as compared with the BMS arm, mainly due to a significant reduction in TLR. There were no significant differences in cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI). This was also observed in both prespecified subgroups IDDM and NIDDM. In the SES group, the incidence density of definite/probable stent thrombosis was 0.53 per 100 person-years, whereas in the BMS group it was 0.8 per 100 person-years. Independent predictors of MACE were: SES implantation (p<0.001), multivessel stent implantation (p=0.04), and creatinine levels (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year follow-up of the DIABETES trial suggests the effect of SES in reducing TLR is similar in both IDDM and NIDDM. No major safety concerns in terms of ST, MI or mortality were observed.

A randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with bare-metal stent-in-stent restenosis: the RIBS V Clinical Trial (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. everolimus-eluting stent)

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) with that of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in patients with bare-metal stents (BMS) in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with ISR remains a challenge.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing DEB with EES in patients with bare-metal stents (BMS) in-stent restenosis (ISR). The primary endpoint was the minimal lumen diameter at 9 months' follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients with BMS-ISR from 25 Spanish sites were included (95 were allocated to DEB and 94 to EES). Procedural success was achieved in all patients. At late angiography (median 249 days; 92% of eligible patients), patients in the EES arm had a significantly larger minimal lumen diameter (2.36 ± 0.6 mm vs. 2.01 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.001; absolute mean difference: 0.35 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16 to 0.53) and a lower percent of diameter stenosis (13 ± 17% vs. 25 ± 20%, p < 0.001). However, late loss (0.04 ± 0.5 mm vs. 0.14 ± 0.5 mm, p = 0.14) and binary restenosis rate (4.7% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.22) were very low and similar in both groups. Clinical follow-up (median 365 days) was obtained in all (100%) patients. Occurrences of the combined clinical outcome measure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization; 6% vs. 8%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.26 to 2.18, p = 0.6) and the need for target vessel revascularization (2% vs. 6%; HR: 0.32: 95% CI: 0.07 to 1.59, p = 0.17) were similar in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with BMS-ISR, both DEB and EES provided excellent clinical results with a very low rate of clinical and angiographic recurrences. However, compared with DEB, EES provide superior late angiographic findings. (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs. Everolimus-eluting Stent [RIBS V]; NCT01239953).

Safety of lone thrombus aspiration without concomitant coronary stenting in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction

AIMS

Although the benefit of concomitant thrombus aspiration (TA) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been demonstrated, very little information is available on its safety as a lone revascularisation technique in this setting. We present our experience in a cohort of patients with STEMI treated only with TA, without concomitant interventional devices.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 28 patients with STEMI, PPCI was performed using only TA on the grounds of an excellent angiographic result and in order to avoid the potential risks associated with balloon dilatation or stenting. The patients were younger than in the overall PPCI population (n=1,737) at our institution (52±18 vs. 63±14 years, p<0.001), with a history of atrial fibrillation in six (21%), cocaine abuse in three (11%) and mechanical cardiac valves in two (7%). Twenty-eight patients (89%) presented STEMI with Killip class I, two (7%) with cardiogenic shock, and two (7%) with sudden cardiac death. A significant reduction in TIMI thrombus grade (5 [4-5] to 1 [0-1.75], p<0.001) and coronary stenosis percentage (%) (87.2±21.3 to 11.3±0.9, p<0.001) as well as an increase in final TIMI flow (0 [0-2] to 3 [3-3], p<0.001) and minimum luminal diameter (mm) (0.89±1.01 to 2.42±0.70, p<0.001) were noted after TA. Transient no-reflow phenomenon, residual intracoronary thrombus and minor distal thrombus embolisation were observed in two (7.1%), 11 (39.3%) and 10 (25.7%) patients, respectively. All but one patient remained asymptomatic during hospital admission. Scheduled control angiography was performed 6±2 days (min-max, 3-10 days) after PPCI in 11 (39%) patients, demonstrating coronary artery patency and TIMI flow grade 3 in all patients. During clinical follow-up, successfully performed in all patients at 40±23 months (min-max, six to 95 months), there was one sudden cardiac death (4%) and three (11%) non-cardiac deaths. One patient (4%) was admitted with non-STEMI (new coronary angiogram without stenosis) and the remaining 22 (78.5%) remained asymptomatic and free of cardiac events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our series suggests that lone TA might be safely performed as a primary revascularisation procedure in STEMI in selected cases. Further information based on additional and larger studies is recommended to confirm our findings.

Safety and efficacy of intense antithrombotic treatment and percutaneous coronary intervention deferral in patients with large intracoronary thrombus

The optimal management of a large intracoronary thrombus in patients with acute coronary syndromes without an urgent need of revascularization is unclear. We investigated whether deferring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after a course of intensive antithrombotic therapy (ATT) (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, enoxaparin, aspirin, and clopidogrel) improves the outcomes compared with immediate PCI. We studied 133 stable patients with ACS and a large intracoronary thrombus and without an urgent need for revascularization at angiography. The angiographic and in-hospital outcomes of a prospective cohort of 89 patients who had undergone deferred angiography with or without PCI after ATT (d-PCI) were compared with a historical cohort of 44 patients who had undergone immediate PCI, matched for age, gender, and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction thrombus grade. The absolute thrombus volume was measured before and after ATT using dual quantitative coronary angiography. All d-PCI patients remained stable during ATT (60.0 ± 30.8 hours). A significant reduction in the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction thrombus grade (4, range 4 to 5, vs 3, range 2 to 4; p <0.001), thrombus volume (51.1, range 32.1 to 83, vs 38.1, range 21.7 to 50.7 mm(3); p <0.001), stenosis severity (73.8 ± 25.8% vs 60.3 ± 32.5%; p <0.001) and better Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow (2, range 0 to 3, vs 3, 1.5 to 3; p <0.001) were noted after ATT. PCI, stenting, and thrombus aspiration were performed less frequently in the d-PCI group (76.4% vs 100%, p <0.001; 70.8% vs 93.2%, p = 0.003; and 21% vs 100%, p <0.001, respectively). However, distal embolization and slow and/or no-reflow were more common during immediate PCI (31.8% vs 9%; p = 0.001). No life-threatening or severe hemorrhagic complications were observed, although the rate of mild and/or moderate bleeding was similar between the 2 groups (6.8% in immediate PCI vs 7.9% in d-PCI; p = 0.829). In conclusion, compared with immediate PCI, d-PCI after ATT in selected, stabilized patients with ACS and a large intracoronary thrombus and without an urgent need for revascularization is probably safe and associated with a reduction in thrombotic burden, angiographic complications, and the need of revascularization. These benefits were observed without an increase in hemorrhagic complications.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: long-term follow-up of a large series of patients prospectively managed with a "conservative" therapeutic strategy

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the long-term clinical outcome of patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCD) managed with a conservative strategy.

BACKGROUND

SCD is a rare, but challenging, clinical entity.

METHODS

A prospective protocol, including a conservative management strategy, was followed. Revascularization was only considered in cases with ongoing/recurrent ischemia. Inflammatory/immunologic markers were systematically obtained.

RESULTS

Forty-five consecutive patients (incidence 0.27%) were studied during a 6-year period. Of these, 27 patients (60%) had "isolated" SCD (I-SCD), and 18 had SCD associated with coronary artery disease (A-SCD). Age was 53 ± 11 years, and 26 patients were female. Most patients presented with an acute myocardial infarction. SCD had a diffuse angiographic pattern (length: 31 ± 23 mm). In 11 patients, the diagnosis was confirmed by intracoronary imaging techniques. Sixteen patients (35%) required revascularization during initial admission. One patient died after surgery, but no additional patient experienced recurrent myocardial infarction. No significant inflammatory/immunologic abnormalities were detected. At follow-up (median 730 days), only 3 patients presented with adverse events (1 died of congestive heart failure, and 2 required revascularization). No patient experienced a myocardial infarction or died suddenly. Event-free survival was similar (94% and 88%, respectively) in patients with I-SCD and A-SCD. Notably, at angiographic follow-up, spontaneous "disappearance" of the SCD image was found in 7 of 13 (54%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large prospective series of consecutive patients with SCD, a "conservative" therapeutic strategy provided excellent long-term prognosis. Clinical outcome was similar in patients with I-SCD and A-SCD. The natural history of SCD includes spontaneous healing with complete resolution.

Morphological characteristics of culprit coronary lesions according to clinical presentation: insights from a multimodality imaging approach

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the morphological characteristics of culprit coronary lesions according to clinical presentation. A combined, comprehensive, multi-imaging modality protocol was systematically used. A total of 46 consecutive patients with stable angina (n = 24) or acute coronary syndromes (n = 22) were included. Culprit lesions were prospectively studied with angiography, multislice computed tomography (MSCT), intravascular ultrasound and virtual histology. MSCT showed a lower radiographic density and a higher remodeling index in culprit lesions of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Intravascular ultrasound examination demonstrated a larger remodeling index, a lower degree of calcification and a higher prevalence of soft lesions in unstable patients. Virtual histology analysis showed a lower percentage of calcium in the area of greatest stenosis and a higher prevalence of lesions with vulnerable characteristics in unstable patients. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, remodeling index by intravascular ultrasound and radiographic density in MSCT were the only independent predictors for identifying unstable culprit lesions. Our study adds further evidence on the best morphological criteria of instability in culprit lesions. Remodeling index by IVUS and low radiographic density by MSTC were the only independent predictors of unstable lesions.

Prognostic implications of bundle branch block in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty in the stent era

The presence of bundle branch block (BBB) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction has been associated with a poor outcome. However, the implications of BBB in patients undergoing primary angioplasty in the stent era are poorly established. Furthermore, the prognostic implications of BBB type (right vs left and previous vs transient or persistent) remain unknown. We analyzed the data from 913 consecutive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. All clinical, electrocardiographic, and angiographic data were prospectively collected. The median follow-up period was 19 months. The primary end point was the combined outcome of death and reinfarction. BBB was documented in 140 patients (15%). Right BBB (RBBB) was present in 119 patients (13%) and was previous in 27 (23%), persistent in 45 (38%), and transient in 47 (39%). Left BBB (LBBB) was present in 21 patients (2%) and was previous in 8 (38%), persistent in 9 (43%), and transient in 4 (19%). Patients with BBB were older, and more frequently had diabetes, anterior infarctions, a greater Killip class, a lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and greater mortality (all p <0.005) than patients without BBB. The short- and long-term primary outcome occurred more frequently in patients with persistent RBBB/LBBB than in those with previous or transient RBBB/LBBB. On multivariate analysis, persistent RBBB/LBBB emerged as an independent predictor of death and reinfarction. In conclusion, in patients undergoing primary angioplasty in the stent era, BBB is associated with poor short- and long-term prognosis. This risk appears to be particularly high among patients with persistent BBB.

Is refined OCT guidance of stent implantation needed?

The development of optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides new opportunities for the evaluation of coronary stents. Having a much higher spatial resolution than intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), OCT is currently used for long-term assessment of stent implantation. In the immediate future, however, it is quite likely that OCT will be used synergically with IVUS to optimise stent deployment; the criteria for optimising stent implantation using OCT will be clearly indebted to the evidence gathered with IVUS, with an added value in contexts like ambiguous images presenting after stenting, or in complex percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) procedures like bifurcation stenting. However, since OCT is capable of identifying, during PCI, findings of potential relevance beyond the resolution IVUS, such as thrombus or tissue protrusion, intra-stent or edge dissections, or specific patterns of hyperplasia in restenotic lesions, it is foreseeable that new OCT-specific recommendations for optimal stent implantation will be made in the near future.

Assessment of microcirculatory remodeling with intracoronary flow velocity and pressure measurements: validation with endomyocardial sampling in cardiac allografts

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary physiology techniques have been validated extensively for the assessment of epicardial stenoses but not for the lone study of coronary microcirculation. We performed a comparison between 4 intracoronary physiological indices with the actual structural microcirculatory changes documented in transplanted hearts.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 17 cardiac allograft patients without coronary stenoses, ECG, intracoronary Doppler flow velocity, and aortic pressure were digitally recorded before and during maximal hyperemia with a dedicated system. Postprocessing of data yielded 4 indices of microcirculatory status: coronary flow velocity reserve (2.13+/-0.59), instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity pressure slope (2.33+/-1.25 cm x s x (-1)mm Hg(-1)), coronary resistance index (1.65+/-0.88 mm Hg x cm(-1) x s(-1)), and coronary resistance reserve (2.36+/-0.65). Quantitative morphometry was performed in endomyocardial biopsies during the same hospital intake; arteriolar obliteration (76.57+/-6.95%) and density (2.00+/-1.22 arterioles per 1 mm(2)) and capillary density (645+/-179 capillaries per 1 mm(2)) were measured. Univariate regression analysis between intracoronary measurements and histological findings revealed that instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope correlated with arteriolar obliteration (r=0.58, P=0.014) and capillary density (r=0.60, P=0.012). Statistical adjustment revealed an independent contribution of arteriolar obliteration (beta=0.61, P=0.0009) and capillary density (beta=-0.60, P=0.0008) to instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope values, resulting in an excellent predictive model (r=0.84, P=0.0002). Coronary resistance index correlated only with capillary density (r=0.70, P=0.019). Relative indices (coronary flow velocity reserve and coronary resistance reserve) did not correlate significantly with arteriolar obliteration, capillary density, or arteriolar density.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary indices derived from pressure and flow, particularly instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope, appear to be superior to coronary flow velocity reserve in detecting structural microcirculatory changes. Both arteriolar obliteration and capillary rarefaction seem to influence microcirculatory hemodynamics independently.

What to do when everything has failed: alternative treatment strategies for failure revascularisations

Percutaneous coronary intervention and bypass grafting are effective for relieving symptoms and improving outcome in patients with coronary artery disease. Despite advances in medical treatment and revascularisation procedures, some patients with symptomatic ischaemic cardiomyopathy are not candidates for revascularisation. As life expectancy increases, interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons face patients with more complex disease, such as those with diffuse coronary disease that cannot be completely revascularised.

Vessel shrinkage as a sign of atherosclerosis progression in type 2 diabetes: a serial intravascular ultrasound analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the natural history of vascular remodeling of atherosclerotic plaques in patients with type 2 diabetes and the predictors of vessel shrinkage.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this serial intracoronary ultrasound (IVUS) study, 237 coronary segments from 45 patients enrolled in the DIABETES I, II, and III trials were included. Quantitative volumetric IVUS analyses (motorized pullbacks at 0.5 mm/s) were performed in the same coronary segment after the index procedure and at the 9-month follow-up. Nontreated mild lesions (angiographic stenosis <25%) with > or =0.5 mm plaque thickening and length of > or =5 mm assessed by IVUS were included. Vessel shrinkage was defined as a Deltaexternal elastic membrane area/Deltaplaque area < 0. Statistical adjustment by multiple segments and multiple lesions per patient was performed.

RESULTS

Vessel shrinkage was identified in 37.1% of segments and was associated with a significant decrease in lumen area at 9 months (vessel shrinkage, 10 +/- 4 mm(2) vs. non-vessel shrinkage, 11 +/- 4 mm(2); P = 0.04). Independent predictors of vessel shrinkage were insulin requirements (odds ratio 4.6 [95% CI 1.40-15.10]; P = 0.01), glycated hemoglobin (1.5 [1.05-2.10]; P = 0.02), apolipoprotein B (0.96 [0.94-0.98]; P < 0.001), hypertension (3.7 [1.40-10.30]; P = 0.009), number of diseased vessels (5.6 [2.50-12.50]; P < 0.001), and prior revascularization (17.5 [6.50-46.90]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This serial IVUS study suggests that progression of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes may be mainly attributed to vessel shrinkage. Besides, vessel shrinkage is influenced by insulin requirements and metabolic control and is associated with more advanced coronary atherosclerosis.

Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis results of the RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with ISR remains a challenge. The long-term outcome of patients with ISR treated with SES remains unknown.

METHODS

The RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study was a randomized trial conducted in 150 patients with ISR (76 SES, 74 balloon angioplasty [BA]). The long-term (>1 year) clinical outcome and pre-specified subgroup analyses were pre-defined secondary study end points.

RESULTS

At 1 year, the event-free survival (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization [TVR]) was better in the SES group (88% vs. 69%, p < 0.005). Additional long-term (>3 years) clinical follow-up was obtained in 97% of patients (median 3.3 years). After the first year, 3 patients died (1 SES, 2 BA), 5 suffered myocardial infarction (4 SES, 1 BA), and 7 required TVR (4 SES, 3 BA). At last follow-up, definitive/probable/possible stent thrombosis was similar in both groups (2/2/1 SES vs. 1/0/3 BA, p = NS). At 4 years, the event-free survival was 76% in the SES arm and 65% in the BA arm (p = 0.019). On multivariate analysis, SES implantation was an independent predictor of event-free survival. Subgroup analyses were consistent with the main outcome measure.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ISR, SES implantation remains effective and safe at very long-term clinical follow-up.

[Diabetic and nondiabetic patients respond differently to transendocardial injection of bone marrow mononuclear cells: findings from prospective clinical trials in "no-option" patients]

Whether stem cell treatment has the same effect in diabetics and nondiabetics is unknown. To compare outcomes in these two groups, we analyzed data from 26 consecutive patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy who were taking part in two clinical trials. Revascularization was not an option for these patients and they were treated with bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs). Patients underwent NOGA electromechanical mapping to identify viable myocardium (i.e., with a unipolar voltage > or = 6.9 mV), after which they received a mean of 28.5+/-4.7 x 10(6) BMMNCs. Patients were followed up at 6 months. In nondiabetics, there was a significant decrease in endsystolic volume between baseline and 6-month follow-up. In addition, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class decreased significantly (P=.04) from 3.0 (1.75-3.0) to 1.0 (1.0-2.0), the Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina score (CCSAS) improved significantly (P=.04) from 3.0 (2.0-4.0) to 1.0 (1.0-1.5), and oxygen uptake increased significantly (P=.04) from 16.4 (13.1-21.5) to 24.5 (17.3-29.2) ml/kg/min. These changes were not observed in diabetic patients. This is the first clinical study to show that BMMNC injection could have a smaller effect in diabetics.

Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients with de novo coronary stenoses: long-term results of the DIABETES trial

AIMS

Sirolimus stent implantation has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in diabetics; however, the long-term outcomes in this high-risk population remain unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) when compared with the bare metal stent (BMS) in patients included in the DIABETES (DIABETes and sirolimus Eluting Stent) trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The prospective multicentre DIABETES trial randomized 160 diabetic patients with one or more significant coronary stenoses in one, two, or three vessels to either SES or BMS implantation. One-year dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) was routinely prescribed. Clinical follow-up was scheduled at 1, 9, 12, and 13 months and 2 years. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable between groups. At 2 years, the rate of target lesion revascularization was significantly lower in the SES group compared with the BMS group (7.7 vs. 35.0%, P < 0.001). However, the total revascularization rate at 2 years increased in both groups due to progression of atherosclerosis in coronary segments remote from the target lesion (rate of atherosclerosis progression: 7.7% in SES group vs. 10% in BMS group; P = 0.7). During dual antiplatelet treatment (1 year), there was no stent thrombosis in the SES group, whereas two patients presented it in the BMS group. However, after clopidogrel withdrawal, three patients allocated to the SES group presented stent thromboses vs. none in the BMS group.

CONCLUSION

SES implantation in diabetic patients remains effective at 2-year follow-up. However, clinical efficacy appeared to be reduced by the occurrence of stent thrombosis between 1 and 2 years.

Eficacia de la implantación del stent recubierto de rapamicina en pacientes diabéticos con vasos muy pequeños (≤ 2,25 mm). Subanálisis del estudio DIABETES

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Diabetic patients frequently have small-diameter vessels, which increases their risk of restenosis. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in these high-risk patients following percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

Our study population comprised a subset of 85 diabetic patients from the DIABETES (DIABETes and sirolimus Eluting Stent) trial who had very small vessels, defined as those with a reference diameter < or =2.25 mm. In the 100 lesions treated, 49 sirolimus-eluting stents and 51 bare-metal stents were used. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used as recommended by the protocol and dual antiplatelet therapy was administered for 1 year.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable in the two groups. The patients' mean age was 66 (9) years, 42% were women, and 37% were insulin-dependent. On average, the lesion length was 15.0 (9.0) mm and the reference diameter was 1.9 (0.2) mm. At 9-month follow-up, both late lumen loss and the restenosis rate were significantly lower in the sirolimus-eluting stent group than in the bare-metal stent group, at -0.03 (0.3) mm vs 0.44 (0.5) mm (P< .001), and 9.1% vs 39.1% (P=.001), respectively. These differences were also observed in the subgroup of insulin-dependent patients. At 1-year follow-up, the stent thrombosis rate was 0% in the sirolimus-eluting stent group, whereas two patients in the bare-metal stent group presented with stent thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetics with very small vessels is safe and effective, even in insulin-dependent patients.

Percutaneous coronary revascularization in diabetics: from balloon angioplasty to drug-eluting stents

Diabetic patients may have aggressive coronary disease with an excessive rate of restenosis and accelerated atherosclerotic progression. This article reviews the different modalities of percutaneous treatment and their results in the diabetic population, from the early days of balloon angioplasty to the current implementation of drug-eluting stents. As restenosis may be virtually eradicated in the near future, plaque progression remains the cornerstone for interventional cardiologists and the medical community. In this regard, attempts to modify life habits, and a more accurate control of the components of the metabolic syndrome should be the main therapeutic objective.

Iatrogenic dissection of the ascending aorta following heart catheterisation: incidence, management and outcome

AIMS

Iatrogenic ascending aorta dissection (AAD) is an uncommon complication following heart catheterisation. AIMS of this study were to determine the incidence, to identify the predisposing procedural factors and to define the management and the outcomes of patients suffering from iatrogenic AD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between January 1996 and May 2005, iatrogenic AAD that occurred during cardiac catheterisations, were retrospectively identified from clinical and peri-procedural data prospectively collected in a dedicated database. At least 1-month clinical follow-up (median 25 months; range 5-77) was obtained in all patients complicated with iatrogenic AD. The overall incidence of iatrogenic AAD was 0.04%; this incidence was significantly higher after interventional procedures (0.12%) than after diagnostic procedures (0.01%; p=0.0001). Most of dissections were located in the right coronary sinus (12 patients; 67%) and limited to the corresponding coronary sinus (Dunning class I: 11 patients; 61%). Manoeuvres most often involved were coronary engagement with the use of non-conventional catheters. Conservative treatment with sealing the entry door by a stent 10 patients (56%) or expectant management 7 patients (39%) resulted in favourable outcomes as none of patients died during hospitalisation and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Iatrogenic AAD is a rare complication following cardiac catheterisation that in the vast majority of patients may benefit from conservative treatment with good long-term outcomes.

Vascular Effects of Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Diabetic Patients

OBJECTIVES

A predefined intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy was performed to evaluate the vascular effects of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus bare-metal stent (BMS).

BACKGROUND

The Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial aimed at demonstrating the efficacy of the SES compared with BMS in diabetic patients.

METHODS

Serial intravascular ultrasound analyses were performed in 140 lesions (SES = 75; BMS = 65) immediately after stent implantation and at nine-month follow-up. Vessel, luminal, and stent mean areas and volumes were evaluated at both edges and within the stented segment. Qualitative assessment of residual dissections and stent apposition were also performed.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. At 9 months, in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) mean area and volume were significantly reduced in the SES group (median NIH area 0.01 mm2 [0.0 to 0.1] vs. 2.0 mm2 [1.0 to 2.9] and median NIH volume 0.11 mm3 [0 to 2.1] vs. 35.3 mm3 [16.6 to 62.6]; both p < 0.0001). In the SES group, stent edges evidenced significant increase in lumen dimensions mainly due to significant increase in vessel volume, whereas those of the BMS group presented vessel shrinkage leading to significant lumen reduction. Late acquired incomplete stent apposition was observed in 11 lesions (14.7%) in the SES group and 0 in the BMS group (p = 0.001). At one year, no stent thromboses occurred in malapposed stents.

CONCLUSIONS

The SES implantation effectively inhibits NIH in diabetic patients. The antirestenotic effect of SES is also appreciated at the stent edges. Late acquired stent malapposition is a frequent phenomenon in diabetic patients treated with SES.

Randomized Comparison of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Standard Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in Diabetic Patients

Background— Outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in diabetic patients are shadowed by the increased rate of recurrence compared with nondiabetic patients.

Methods and Results— We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to demonstrate the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with standard stents to prevent restenosis in diabetic patients with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. The primary end point of the trial was in-segment late lumen loss as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography at 9-month follow-up. The trial was stratified by diabetes treatment status. One hundred sixty patients were randomized to sirolimus-eluting stents (80 patients; 111 lesions) or standard stent implantation (80 patients; 110 lesions). On average, reference diameter was 2.34±0.6 mm, lesion length was 15.0±8 mm, and 13.1% of lesions were chronic total occlusions. In-segment late lumen loss was reduced from 0.47±0.5 mm for standard stents to 0.06±0.4 mm for sirolimus stents ( P <0.001). Target-lesion revascularization and major adverse cardiac event rates were significantly lower in the sirolimus group (31.3% versus 7.3% and 36.3% versus 11.3%, respectively; both P <0.001). Non–insulin- and insulin-requiring patients demonstrated similar reductions in angiographic and clinical parameters of restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. During the 9-month follow-up, stent thrombosis occurred in 2 patients after standard stent implantation. Conversely, this phenomenon was not seen in the sirolimus stent group.

Conclusions— This randomized trial demonstrated that sirolimus stent implantation is safe and efficacious in reducing both angiographic and clinical parameters of restenosis compared with standard stents in diabetic patients with de novo coronary stenoses.

Diabetes mellitus and percutaneous coronary revascularization

Diabetes mellitus is a complex metabolic disorder with aggressive and progressive cardiovascular expression. This article reviews the main percutaneous techniques and their results in the diabetic population, from the early days of balloon angioplasty to the recently advent of drug eluting stents. As the latter devices may eradicate restenosis, plaque progression will remain the cornerstone for interventional cardiologists and the medical community. Attempts to modify life habits, and a more accurate control of the components of the metabolic syndrome should be the main therapeutic objective to slow down the progression and expansion of the disease.

LDL-cholesterol predicts negative coronary artery remodelling in diabetic patients: an intravascular ultrasound study

AIMS

To investigate the relationship between coronary artery remodelling and glycaemic and lipid profiles in diabetic patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Intravascular ultrasound analyses of 131 angiographically non-significant coronary stenoses in 80 diabetic patients were performed. The remodelling index (RI) was calculated as the ratio between total vessel area at target site and total vessel area at proximal reference, and was assessed in two ways: as a continuous variable, and as a binary categorical variable: RI<1 namely, negative remodelling (group I), or RI> or =1 (group II). Percentage cross-sectional narrowing was 57+/-13%. On average, RI was 0.93+/-0.13. Coronary shrinkage was found in 94 (71.7%) lesions. Significant inverse correlations were demonstrated between RI and total cholesterol (r=-0.26, P=0.003), apolipoprotein-B (r=-0.23, P=0.01) and LDL-cholesterol (r=-0.3, P=0.001) levels. Multivariable lineal regression analysis identified LDL-cholesterol as the only independent predictor of RI (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Negative remodelling is a frequent finding in diabetics and it is associated with LDL-cholesterol levels. This may contribute to the diffuse coronary artery disease observed in diabetic patients.

Intracoronary brachytherapy following drug-eluting stent failure. It's still not time to hang up the spikes!

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have significantly reduced the incidence of restenosis. Although the results obtained with these novel antiproliferative devices are encouraging, recent reports have shown that DES are not completely immune from restenosis. Therefore, the broad use of DES has inevitably led to a major issue: treatment of DES failure. Intracoronary brachytherapy (IBT) represents an important advancement for treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and has led to important pathophysiological insight on the restenotic process. To date, IBT, when properly used, still represents the gold standard for treatment of ISR. However, experience with IBT is for treatment of ISR occurring with bare metal stents (BMS). Whether IBT may be used with the same safety and efficacy profile as an adjunctive treatment for ISR following DES implantation is still unknown. In this article, we report the outcome of a series of patients with DES failure treated with IBT. IBT for treatment of DES failure was shown to be both safe and efficient and, therefore, until ISR exists, IBT still remains an important player in this growing and even more challenging setting.

[Predictors of mortality following rescue percutaneous intervention]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Rescue percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is a mechanical reperfusion strategy aimed at achieving patency of the infarct-related artery after failed thrombolysis. However, in randomized studies the indication for rescue PTCA was per protocol rather than based on clinical criteria. The aim of this study was to determine predictors of mortality at 30 days following rescue percutaneous intervention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one consecutive patients who underwent rescue PTCA were included. Mean age was 61 (11) years, 80% were men and 9.8% had diabetes.

RESULTS

The infarct-related artery was the left anterior descending artery in the 46.5%, and the mean percentage of stenoses was 91.0 (11.6)%. A stent was implanted in 97.2% and TIMI II-III flow was obtained in the 97.2% of the patients. Overall mortality was 9.8% at 30 days follow-up and 11.3% at 1 year follow-up. In the multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of mortality at 30 days were age (OR=1.2, 95% CI: 1.03-1.5, P=.001), Killip class III-IV (OR=20.1; 95% CI: 1.7-500; P=.003), PTCA failure (OR=indeterminate; P=.04) and left anterior descending artery involvement (OR=12.6; 95% CI: 0.7-214.9; P=.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Rescue PTCA is effective in restoring blood flow in the infarct-related artery in the majority of patients in whom thrombolysis failed. The independent predictors of mortality were similar to those previously reported in acute myocardial infarction.

Late stent thrombosis (> 1 year) following clopidogrel withdrawal after brachytherapy treatment: Need to assess aspirin resistance?

We report on a patient presenting with late thrombosis of a stent 15 months after being treated with intracoronary brachytherapy. It occurred 17 days after clopidogrel withdrawal while maintaining treatment with aspirin. At the time of stent thrombosis, evaluation of platelet aggregation was performed, revealing a suboptimal response to aspirin. Pathophysiological insights of aspirin resistance and clinical implications are reviewed.