Centromere protein U enhances the progression of bladder cancer by promoting mitochondrial ribosomal protein s28 expression

Bladder cancer is one of the most common types of cancer. Most gene mutations related to bladder cancer are dominantly acquired gene mutations and are not inherited. Previous comparative transcriptome analysis of urinary bladder cancer and control samples has revealed a set of genes that may play a role in tumor progression. Here we set out to investigate further the expression of two candidate genes, centromere protein U (CENPU) and mitochondrial ribosomal protein s28 (MRPS28) to better understand their role in bladder cancer pathogenesis. Our results confirmed that CENPU is up-regulated in human bladder cancer tissues at mRNA and protein levels. Gain-of-function and loss-of-function studies in T24 human urinary bladder cancer cell line revealed a hierarchical relationship between CENPU and MRPS28 in the regulation of cell viability, migration and invasion activity. CENPU expression was also up-regulated in in vivo nude mice xenograft model of bladder cancer and mice overexpressing CENPU had significantly higher tumor volume. In summary, our findings identify CENPU and MRPS28 in the molecular pathogenesis of bladder cancer and suggest that CENPU enhances the progression of bladder cancer by promoting MRPS28 expression.

Phosphorylation of histone H3 by Haspin regulates chromosome alignment and segregation during mitosis in maize

In human cells, Haspin-mediated histone H3 threonine 3 (H3T3) phosphorylation promotes centromeric localization of the chromosomal passenger complex, thereby ensuring proper kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Haspin also binds to PDS5 cohesin-associated factor B (Pds5B), antagonizing the Wings apart-like protein homolog (Wapl)-Pds5B interaction and thus preventing Wapl from releasing centromeric cohesion during mitosis. However, the role of Haspin in plant chromosome segregation is not well understood. Here, we show that in maize (Zea mays) mitotic cells, ZmHaspin localized to the centromere during metaphase and anaphase, whereas it localized to the telomeres during meiosis. These results suggest that ZmHaspin plays different roles during mitosis and meiosis. Knockout of ZmHaspin led to decreased H3T3 phosphorylation and histone H3 serine 10 phosphorylation, and defects in chromosome alignment and segregation in mitosis. These lines of evidence suggest that Haspin regulates chromosome segregation in plants via the mechanism described for humans, namely, H3T3 phosphorylation. Plant Haspin proteins lack the RTYGA and PxVxL motifs needed to bind Pds5B and heterochromatin protein 1, and no obvious cohesion defects were detected in ZmHaspin knockout plants. Taken together, these results highlight the conserved but slightly different roles of Haspin proteins in cell division in plants and in animals.

Tandem Repeat-Based Probes Support the Loop Model of Pericentromere Packing

Constitutive heterochromatin is the most mysterious part of the eukaryotic genome. It forms vital chromosome regions such as the centromeric and the pericentromeric ones. The main component of heterochromatic regions are tandem repeats (TR), and their specific organization complicates assembly, annotation, and mapping of these regions. Unannotated and unmapped TR arrays are still present in database contigs. In this study, we used a set of TR in the genomes of the pig (Sus scrofa) and the Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus) identified with the help of bioinformatics techniques and determined the specificity of the designed probes. The signal of the 4 pig TR probes in spermatogenic cells was often ring-shaped, especially in primary spermatocytes. The rings were located in the regions relatively weakly stained with DAPI. The unique assembly of the centromeric region was traced using the hamster meiotic chromosomes. The probe specific to chromosome 5 was used. Two signals, arranged as rings, were seen at the pachytene stage, similar to those in the pig spermatogenic cells. In the spermatogenic cells of both pig and hamster, the rings appeared on the chromosomes with pericentromeric TR probes. Our observations support the loop model of the centromeric region, the size of the loops being about 50 kb.

Emerging roles of centromeric RNAs in centromere formation and function

BACKGROUND

Centromeres are specialized chromosomal domains involved in kinetochore formation and faithful chromosome segregation. Despite a high level of functional conservation, centromeres are not identified by DNA sequences, but by epigenetic means. Universally, centromeres are typically formed on highly repetitive DNA, which were previously considered to be silent. However, recent studies have shown that transcription occurs in this region, known as centromeric-derived RNAs (cenRNAs). CenRNAs that contribute to fundamental aspects of centromere function have been recently investigated in detail. However, the distribution, behavior and contributions of centromeric transcripts are still poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the roles of cenRNAs in centromere formation and function.

METHODS

We describe the structure and DNA sequence of centromere from yeast to human. In addition, we briefly introduce the roles of cenRNAs in centromere formation and function, kinetochore structure, accurate chromosome segregation, and pericentromeric heterochromatin assembly. Centromeric circular RNAs (circRNAs) and R-loops are rising stars in centromere function. CircRNAs have been successfully identified in various species with the assistance of high-throughput sequencing and novel computational approaches for non-polyadenylated RNA transcripts. Centromeric R-loops can be identified by the single-strand DNA ligation-based library preparation technique. But the molecular features and function of these centromeric R-loops and circRNAs are still being investigated.

CONCLUSION

In this review, we summarize recent findings on the epigenetic regulation of cenRNAs across species, which would provide useful information about cenRNAs and interesting hints for further studies.

Direct evidence for crossover and chromatid interference in meiosis of two plant hybrids (Lolium multiflorum×Festuca pratensis and Allium cepa×A. roylei)

Crossing over, in addition to its strictly genetic role, also performs a critical mechanical function, by bonding homologues in meiosis. Hence, it is responsible for an orderly reduction of the chromosome number. As such, it is strictly controlled in frequency and distribution. The well-known crossover control is positive crossover interference which reduces the probability of a crossover in the vicinity of an already formed crossover. A poorly studied aspect of the control is chromatid interference. Such analyses are possible in very few organisms as they require observation of all four products of a single meiosis. Here, we provide direct evidence of chromatid interference. Using in situ probing in two interspecific plant hybrids (Lolium multiflorum×Festuca pratensis and Allium cepa×A. roylei) during anaphase I, we demonstrate that the involvement of four chromatids in double crossovers is significantly more frequent than expected (64% versus 25%). We also provide a physical measure of the crossover interference distance, covering ~30-40% of the relative chromosome arm length, and show that the centromere acts as a barrier for crossover interference. The two arms of a chromosome appear to act as independent units in the process of crossing over. Chromatid interference has to be seriously addressed in genetic mapping approaches and further studies.

Two telomeric ends of acrocentric chromosome play distinct roles in homologous chromosome synapsis in the fetal mouse oocyte

In mammalian oocytes, proper chromosome segregation at the first meiotic division is dictated by the presence and site of homologous chromosome recombination, which takes place in fetal life. Our current understanding of how homologous chromosomes find each other and initiate synapsis, which is prerequisite for homologous recombination, is limited. It is known that chromosome telomeres are anchored into the nuclear envelope (NE) at the early meiotic prophase I (MPI) and move along NE to facilitate homologous chromosome search and pairing. However, the mouse (Mus musculus) carries all acrocentric chromosomes with one telomeric end close to the centromere (subcentromeric telomere; C-telomere) and the other far away from the centromere (distal telomere; D-telomere), and how C- and D-telomeres participate in chromosome pairing and synapsis during the MPI progression is not well understood. Here, we found in the mouse oocyte that C- and D-telomeres transiently clustered in one area, but D-telomeres soon separated together from C-telomeres and then dispersed to preferentially initiate synapsis, while C-telomeres remained in clusters and synapsed at the last. In the Spo11 null oocyte, which is deficient in SPO11-dependent DSBs formation and homologous synapsis, the pattern of C- and D-telomere clustering and resolution was not affected, but synapsis was more frequently initiated at C-telomeres. These results suggest that SPO11 suppresses the early synapsis between C-telomeres in clusters.

CENP-C Phosphorylation by CDK1 in vitro

Accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis requires the kinetochore, a large protein complex, which makes a linkage between chromosomes and spindle microtubes. An essential kinetochore component, CENP-C, is phosphorylated by Cyclin-B-Cyclin dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) that is a master kinase for mitotic progression, promoting proper kinetochore assembly during mitosis. Here, we describe an in vitro CDK1 kinase assay to detect CENP-C phosphorylation using Phos-tag SDS-PAGE without radiolabeled ATP. Our protocol has advantages in ease and safety over conventional phosphorylation assays using [γ-³²P]-ATP, which has potential hazards despite their better sensitivity. The protocol described here can be applicable to other kinases and be also useful for analysis of phospho-sites in substrates in vitro.

Centromeres Transcription and Transcripts for Better and for Worse

Centromeres are chromosomal regions that are essential for the faithful transmission of genetic material through each cell division. They represent the chromosomal platform on which assembles a protein complex, the kinetochore, which mediates attachment to the mitotic spindle. In most organisms, centromeres assemble on large arrays of tandem satellite repeats, although their DNA sequences and organization are highly divergent among species. It has become evident that centromeres are not defined by underlying DNA sequences, but are instead epigenetically defined by the deposition of the centromere-specific histone H3 variant, CENP-A. In addition, and although long regarded as silent chromosomal loci, centromeres are in fact transcriptionally competent in most species, yet at low levels in normal somatic cells, but where the resulting transcripts participate in centromere architecture, identity, and function. In this chapter, we discuss the various roles proposed for centromere transcription and their transcripts, and the potential molecular mechanisms involved. We also discuss pathological cases in which unscheduled transcription of centromeric repeats or aberrant accumulation of their transcripts are pathological signatures of chromosomal instability diseases. In sum, tight regulation of centromeric satellite repeats transcription is critical for healthy development and tissue homeostasis, and thus prevents the emergence of disease states.

Centromere Engineering as an Emerging Tool for Haploid Plant Production: Advances and Challenges

Haploid production is of great importance in plant breeding programs. Doubled haploid technology accelerates the generation of inbred lines with homozygosity in all loci in a single year. Haploids can be induced in vitro via cultivating the haploid gametes or in vivo through inter- and intraspecific hybridization. Haploid induction through centromere engineering is a novel system that is theoretically applicable to many plant species. The present review chapter discusses the proposed molecular mechanisms of selective chromosome elimination in early embryogenesis and the effects of kinetochore component modifications on proper chromosome segregation. Finally, the advantages and limitations of the CENH3-mediated haploidization approach and its applications are highlighted.

Centromere targeting of Mis18 requires the interaction with DNA and H2A-H2B in fission yeast

Faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis requires the correct assembly of kinetochore on the centromere. CENP-A is a variant of histone H3, which specializes the centromere region on chromatin and mediates the kinetochore assembly. The Mis18 complex plays a critical role in initiating the centromere loading of the newly-synthesized CENP-A. However, it remains unclear how Mis18 complex (spMis18, spMis16 and spMis19) is located to the centromere to license the recruitment of Cnp1CENP-A in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. We found that spMis18 directly binds to nucleosomal DNA through its extreme C-terminus and interacts with H2A-H2B dimer via the acidic region on the surface of its Yippee-like domain. Live-cell imaging confirmed that mutation of the acidic region and deletion of the extreme C-terminus significantly impairs the localization of spMis18 and Cnp1 to the centromere and delays chromosome segregation during mitosis. Our findings illustrate that the interaction of spMis18 with histone H2A-H2B and DNA plays important roles in the recruitment of spMis18 and Cnp1 to the centromere in fission yeast.

Spatial constraints on chromosomes are instrumental to meiotic pairing

In most eukaryotes, the meiotic chromosomal bouquet (comprising clustered chromosome ends) provides an ordered chromosome arrangement that facilitates pairing and recombination between homologous chromosomes. In the protist Tetrahymena thermophila, the meiotic prophase nucleus stretches enormously, and chromosomes assume a bouquet-like arrangement in which telomeres and centromeres are attached to opposite poles of the nucleus. We have identified and characterized three meiosis-specific genes [meiotic nuclear elongation 1-3 (MELG1-3)] that control nuclear elongation, and centromere and telomere clustering. The Melg proteins interact with cytoskeletal and telomere-associated proteins, and probably repurpose them for reorganizing the meiotic prophase nucleus. A lack of sequence similarity between the Tetrahymena proteins responsible for telomere clustering and bouquet proteins of other organisms suggests that the Tetrahymena bouquet is analogous, rather than homologous, to the conserved eukaryotic bouquet. We also report that centromere clustering is more important than telomere clustering for homologous pairing. Therefore, we speculate that centromere clustering may have been the primordial mechanism for chromosome pairing in early eukaryotes.

High allelic diversity of the centromere-specific histone H3 (CENH3) in the legume sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia)

The centromere is a structurally and functionally specialized region on each eukaryotic chromosome and is essential for accurate and complete segregation of chromosomes during cell division. Centromeric nucleosomes differ from canonical nucleosomes by replacement of the histone H3 with its centromere-specific variant CENH3. CENH3 is essential for active centromeres in most eukaryotes. Homologs of CENH3 are identified in many organisms. Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) is an agriculturally important perennial forage and is a legume of the Fabaceae family. There is very limited information on the structure of the sainfoin genome and no data are available on its centromere structure. Here, we aim to characterize the sainfoin CENH3 homolog (OvCENH3). Using a sequence homology-based strategy with gene-specific primers, we were able to clone transcripts from sainfoin total RNA. The amplified clones were sequenced and compared by bioinformatics tools. Four distinct alleles of OvCENH3 were detected. Our study provides the first structural features on sainfoin centromeres with a possible allotetraploid origin for sainfoin. We discuss and compare our findings with that for other important legume species.

Centromere strength: just a sense of proportion

The overall structure and composition of human centromeres have been well reported, but how these elements vary between individual chromosomes and influence the chromosome-specific behavior during mitosis remains untested. In our study, we discover the existence of heterogeneity of centromeric DNA features that dictates the chromosome segregation fidelity during mitosis.

Considerations regarding centromere assembly in plant whole-genome sequencing

The assembly of centromeric regions has become one of the most intractable tasks in whole-genome sequencing due to the enrichment of highly repetitive DNA sequences in most eukaryotic centromeres. Here, we describe a method used to identify centromeric DNAs through chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing (ChIP-seq). By mapping ChIP-seq reads, centromeric regions can be indicated in genome assemblies. We demonstrated that the assembly quality of centromeres obtained using ChIP-seq mapping can reflect and indicate the quality of a whole-genome assembly. We discuss an expected 'high-quality' centromere assembly obtained via centromere ChIP-seq mapping.

CENP-B creates alternative epigenetic chromatin states permissive for CENP-A or heterochromatin assembly

CENP-B binds to CENP-B boxes on centromeric satellite DNAs (known as alphoid DNA in humans). CENP-B maintains kinetochore function through interactions with CENP-A nucleosomes and CENP-C. CENP-B binding to transfected alphoid DNA can induce de novo CENP-A assembly, functional centromere and kinetochore formation, and subsequent human artificial chromosome (HAC) formation. Furthermore, CENP-B also facilitates H3K9 (histone H3 lysine 9) trimethylation on alphoid DNA, mediated by Suv39h1, at ectopic alphoid DNA integration sites. Excessive heterochromatin invasion into centromere chromatin suppresses CENP-A assembly. It is unclear how CENP-B controls such different chromatin states. Here, we show that the CENP-B acidic domain recruits histone chaperones and many chromatin modifiers, including the H3K36 methylase ASH1L, as well as the heterochromatin components Suv39h1 and HP1 (HP1α, β and γ, also known as CBX5, CBX1 and CBX3, respectively). ASH1L facilitates the formation of open chromatin competent for CENP-A assembly on alphoid DNA. These results indicate that CENP-B is a nexus for histone modifiers that alternatively promote or suppress CENP-A assembly by mutually exclusive mechanisms. Besides the DNA-binding domain, the CENP-B acidic domain also facilitates CENP-A assembly de novo on transfected alphoid DNA. CENP-B therefore balances CENP-A assembly and heterochromatin formation on satellite DNA.

Epigenetic regulation of centromere function

The centromere is a specialized region on the chromosome that directs equal chromosome segregation. Centromeres are usually not defined by DNA sequences alone. How centromere formation and function are determined by epigenetics is still not fully understood. Active centromeres are often marked by the presence of centromeric-specific histone H3 variant, centromere protein A (CENP-A). How CENP-A is assembled into the centromeric chromatin during the cell cycle and propagated to the next cell cycle or the next generation to maintain the centromere function has been intensively investigated. In this review, we summarize current understanding of how post-translational modifications of CENP-A and other centromere proteins, centromeric and pericentric histone modifications, non-coding transcription and transcripts contribute to centromere function, and discuss their intricate relationships and potential feedback mechanisms.

Dynamics of kinetochore structure and its regulations during mitotic progression

Faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis in eukaryotes requires attachment of the kinetochore, a large protein complex assembled on the centromere of each chromosome, to the spindle microtubules. The kinetochore is a structural interface for the microtubule attachment and provides molecular surveillance mechanisms that monitor and ensure the precise microtubule attachment as well, including error correction and spindle assembly checkpoint. During mitotic progression, the kinetochore undergoes dynamic morphological changes that are observable through electron microscopy as well as through fluorescence microscopy. These structural changes might be associated with the kinetochore function. In this review, we summarize how the dynamics of kinetochore morphology are associated with its functions and discuss recent findings on the switching of protein interaction networks in the kinetochore during cell cycle progression.

H3K9me3 maintenance on a human artificial chromosome is required for segregation but not centromere epigenetic memory

Most eukaryotic centromeres are located within heterochromatic regions. Paradoxically, heterochromatin can also antagonize de novo centromere formation, and some centromeres lack it altogether. In order to investigate the importance of heterochromatin at centromeres, we used epigenetic engineering of a synthetic alphoidtetO human artificial chromosome (HAC), to which chimeric proteins can be targeted. By tethering the JMJD2D demethylase (also known as KDM4D), we removed heterochromatin mark H3K9me3 (histone 3 lysine 9 trimethylation) specifically from the HAC centromere. This caused no short-term defects, but long-term tethering reduced HAC centromere protein levels and triggered HAC mis-segregation. However, centromeric CENP-A was maintained at a reduced level. Furthermore, HAC centromere function was compatible with an alternative low-H3K9me3, high-H3K27me3 chromatin signature, as long as residual levels of H3K9me3 remained. When JMJD2D was released from the HAC, H3K9me3 levels recovered over several days back to initial levels along with CENP-A and CENP-C centromere levels, and mitotic segregation fidelity. Our results suggest that a minimal level of heterochromatin is required to stabilize mitotic centromere function but not for maintaining centromere epigenetic memory, and that a homeostatic pathway maintains heterochromatin at centromeres.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first authors of the paper.

Differential chromatin accessibility landscape reveals structural and functional features of the allopolyploid wheat chromosomes

Background

Our understanding of how the complexity of the wheat genome influences the distribution of chromatin states along the homoeologous chromosomes is limited. Using a differential nuclease sensitivity assay, we investigate the chromatin states of the coding and repetitive regions of the allopolyploid wheat genome.

Results

Although open chromatin is found to be significantly enriched around genes, the majority of MNase-sensitive regions are located within transposable elements (TEs). Chromatin of the smaller D genome is more accessible than that of the larger A and B genomes. Chromatin states of different TEs vary among families and are influenced by the TEs’ chromosomal position and proximity to genes. While the chromatin accessibility of genes is influenced by proximity to TEs, and not by their position on the chromosomes, we observe a negative chromatin accessibility gradient along the telomere-centromere axis in the intergenic regions, positively correlated with the distance between genes. Both gene expression levels and homoeologous gene expression bias are correlated with chromatin accessibility in promoter regions. The differential nuclease sensitivity assay accurately predicts previously detected centromere locations. SNPs located within more accessible chromatin explain a higher proportion of genetic variance for a number of agronomic traits than SNPs located within more closed chromatin.

Conclusions

Chromatin states in the wheat genome are shaped by the interplay of repetitive and gene-encoding regions that are predictive of the functional and structural organization of chromosomes, providing a powerful framework for detecting genomic features involved in gene regulation and prioritizing genomic variation to explain phenotypes.

The mechanisms and significance of the positional control of centromeres and telomeres in plants

The centromere and telomere are universal heterochromatic domains; however, the proper positioning of those domains in nuclear space during the mitotic interphase differs among eukaryotes. Consequently, the question arises how and why this difference occurs. Studies over the past 2 decades have identified several nuclear membrane proteins, nucleolar proteins, and the structural maintenance of a chromosome complex as factors involved in the positional control of centromeres and/or telomeres during the mitotic interphase in yeasts, animals, and plants. In this review, with a primary focus on plants, the roles of those factors are summarized, and the biological significance of proper centromere and telomere positionings during the mitotic interphase is discussed in an effort to provide guidance for this question.

Centromere studies in the era of 'telomere-to-telomere' genomics

We are entering into an exciting era of genomics where truly complete, high-quality assemblies of human chromosomes are available end-to-end, or from 'telomere-to-telomere' (T2T). This technological advance offers a new opportunity to include endogenous human centromeric regions in high-resolution, sequence-based studies. These emerging reference maps are expected to reveal a new functional landscape in the human genome, where centromere proteins, transcriptional regulation, and spatial organization can be examined with base-level resolution across different stages of development and disease. Such studies will depend on innovative assembly methods of extremely long tandem repeats (ETRs), or satellite DNAs, paired with the development of new, orthogonal validation methods to ensure accuracy and completeness. This review reflects the progress in centromere genomics, credited by recent advancements in long-read sequencing and assembly methods. In doing so, I will discuss the challenges that remain and the promise for a new period of scientific discovery for satellite DNA biology and centromere function.

Dbf4-Dependent Kinase (DDK)-Mediated Proteolysis of CENP-A Prevents Mislocalization of CENP-A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The evolutionarily conserved centromeric histone H3 variant (Cse4 in budding yeast, CENP-A in humans) is essential for faithful chromosome segregation. Mislocalization of CENP-A to non-centromeric chromatin contributes to chromosomal instability (CIN) in yeast, fly, and human cells and CENP-A is highly expressed and mislocalized in cancers. Defining mechanisms that prevent mislocalization of CENP-A is an area of active investigation. Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of overexpressed Cse4 (GALCSE4) by E3 ubiquitin ligases such as Psh1 prevents mislocalization of Cse4, and psh1 Δ strains display synthetic dosage lethality (SDL) with GALCSE4 We previously performed a genome-wide screen and identified five alleles of CDC7 and DBF4 that encode the Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK) complex, which regulates DNA replication initiation, among the top twelve hits that displayed SDL with GALCSE4 We determined that cdc7 -7 strains exhibit defects in ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of Cse4 and show mislocalization of Cse4 Mutation of MCM5 (mcm5 -bob1) bypasses the requirement of Cdc7 for replication initiation and rescues replication defects in a cdc7 -7 strain. We determined that mcm5 -bob1 does not rescue the SDL and defects in proteolysis of GALCSE4 in a cdc7 -7 strain, suggesting a DNA replication-independent role for Cdc7 in Cse4 proteolysis. The SDL phenotype, defects in ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, and the mislocalization pattern of Cse4 in a cdc7 -7 psh1 Δ strain were similar to that of cdc7 -7 and psh1 Δ strains, suggesting that Cdc7 regulates Cse4 in a pathway that overlaps with Psh1 Our results define a DNA replication initiation-independent role of DDK as a regulator of Psh1-mediated proteolysis of Cse4 to prevent mislocalization of Cse4.

The role of the histone H3 variant CENPA in prostate cancer

Overexpression of centromeric proteins has been identified in a number of human malignancies, but the functional and mechanistic contributions of these proteins to disease progression have not been characterized. The centromeric histone H3 variant centromere protein A (CENPA) is an epigenetic mark that determines centromere identity. Here, using an array of approaches, including RNA-sequencing and ChIP-sequencing analyses, immunohistochemistry-based tissue microarrays, and various cell biology assays, we demonstrate that CENPA is highly overexpressed in prostate cancer in both tissue and cell lines and that the level of CENPA expression correlates with the disease stage in a large cohort of patients. Gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments confirmed that CENPA promotes prostate cancer cell line growth. The results from the integrated sequencing experiments suggested a previously unidentified function of CENPA as a transcriptional regulator that modulates expression of critical proliferation, cell-cycle, and centromere/kinetochore genes. Taken together, our findings show that CENPA overexpression is crucial to prostate cancer growth.

Human artificial chromosome: Chromatin assembly mechanisms and CENP-B

The centromere is a specialized chromosomal locus required for accurate chromosome segregation. Heterochromatin also assembles around centromere chromatin and forms a base that supports sister chromatid cohesion until anaphase begins. Both centromere chromatin and heterochromatin assemble on a centromeric DNA sequence, a highly repetitive sequence called alphoid DNA (α-satellite DNA) in humans. Alphoid DNA can form a de novo centromere and subsequent human artificial chromosome (HAC) when introduced into the human culture cells HT1080. HAC is maintained stably as a single chromosome independent of other human chromosomes. For de novo centromere assembly and HAC formation, the centromere protein CENP-B and its binding sites, CENP-B boxes, are required in the repeating units of alphoid DNA. CENP-B has multiple roles in de novo centromere chromatin assembly and stabilization and in heterochromatin formation upon alphoid DNA introduction into the cells. Here we review recent progress in human artificial chromosome construction and centromere/heterochromatin assembly and maintenance, focusing on the involvement of human centromere DNA and CENP-B protein.

The unique kind of human artificial chromosome: Bypassing the requirement for repetitive centromere DNA

Centromeres are essential components of all eukaryotic chromosomes, including artificial/synthetic ones built in the laboratory. In humans, centromeres are typically located on repetitive α-satellite DNA, and these sequences are the "major ingredient" in first-generation human artificial chromosomes (HACs). Repetitive centromeric sequences present a major challenge for the design of synthetic mammalian chromosomes because they are difficult to synthesize, assemble, and characterize. Additionally, in most eukaryotes, centromeres are defined epigenetically. Here, we review the role of the genetic and epigenetic contributions to establishing centromere identity, highlighting recent work to hijack the epigenetic machinery to initiate centromere identity on a new generation of HACs built without α-satellite DNA. We also discuss the opportunities and challenges in developing useful unique sequence-based HACs.