Peripartum cardiomyopathy in an elderly woman: A case report

Cardiomyopathy accounts for 11.5% cause of pregnancy-related deaths. The causes of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) are unknown, including predisposing factors such as abnormal response to the greater hemodynamic burden of pregnancy, viral myocarditis, malnutrition, inflammation, and apoptosis. Elderly women, twin gestation, preeclampsia, smoking, and anemia are potential high-risk factors for PPCM. Here, rare case of a patient is described that presented with complaints of breathlessness, cough, and symptoms of heart failure and was diagnosed early as PPCM based on 2D echocardiography and was managed with medical therapy and timely delivery of fetus. Symptomatic relief of symptoms was relieved by diuretics, inotropic drugs, and beta-blockers. The left ventricular ejection fraction increased eventually over 3 weeks and now the patient is a follow-up case since two years from the time of episode. In conclusion, PPCM is rare, which requires prompt management and heightened mindfulness; therefore, early detection and timely treatment can reduce maternal mortality.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure: Are There Thresholds and Inflection Points in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Thresholds Justifying a Clinical Classification?

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines proposed a classification for heart failure (HF) on the basis of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), although it remains unclear whether the divisions chosen were biologically rational. Using patients spanning the full range of LVEF, we examined whether there was evidence of LVEF thresholds in patient characteristics or inflection points in clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Using patient-level information, we created a merged dataset of 33 699 participants who had been enrolled in 6 randomized controlled HF trials including patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. The relationship between the incidence of all-cause death (and specific causes of death) and HF hospitalization, and LVEF, was evaluated using Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

As LVEF increased, age, the proportion of women, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, and prevalence of atrial fibrillation and diabetes increased, whereas ischemic pathogenesis, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) decreased. As LVEF increased >50%, age and the proportion of women continued to increase, and ischemic pathogenesis and NT-proBNP decreased, but other characteristics did not change meaningfully. The incidence of most clinical outcomes (except noncardiovascular death) decreased as LVEF increased, with a LVEF inflection point of around 50% for all-cause death and cardiovascular death, around 40% for pump failure death, and around 35% for HF hospitalization. Higher than those thresholds, there was little further decline in the incidence rate. There was no evidence of a J-shaped relationship between LVEF and death; no evidence of worse outcomes in patients with high-normal ("supranormal") LVEF. Similarly, in a subset of patients with echocardiographic data, there were no structural differences in patients with a high-normal LVEF suggestive of amyloidosis, and NT-proBNP levels were consistent with this conclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HF, there was a LVEF threshold of around 40% to 50% where the pattern of patient characteristics changed, and event rates began to increase compared with higher LVEF values. Our findings provide evidence to support current upper LVEF thresholds defining HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction on the basis of prognosis.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifiers: NCT00634309, NCT00634400, NCT00634712, NCT00095238, NCT01035255, NCT00094302, NCT00853658, and NCT01920711.

Prognostic implications of left ventricular ejection fraction trajectory changes in heart failure

Aims

The latest guidelines recommended to assess the trajectory of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with heart failure (HF). However, there is limited data on the trajectory of LVEF in real-world settings. In this study, we investigated the frequency and prognostic implications of changes in LVEF trajectory.

Methods

Patients were divided into intensified LVEF, static LVEF, and worsening LVEF groups based on the transitions of HF types from baseline to follow-up. The intensified and worsening LVEF groups were further subdivided into mild (≤10% absolute changes of LVEF) and significant (>10% absolute changes of LVEF) increase or decrease groups according to the magnitude of change. The incidences and associations of changes in LVEF with patient outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Among the 2,429 patients in the study cohort, 38.3% of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and 37.6% of HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) showed an improvement in their LVEF. In contrast, a decline in LVEF was observed in 19.3% of HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and 34.9% of those with HFmrEF. Cox regression analysis showed that the intensified LVEF group was associated with a lower risk of composite endpoints, while the worsening LVEF group yielded opposite findings. Subgroup analysis revealed that compared to those with mild changes in LVEF, baseline HFrEF patients with significant increase showed a lower risk of composite outcome, while baseline HFpEF patients were the opposite.

Conclusions

The trajectories of LVEF changes are strongly correlated with outcomes in patients with HF who had prior history of HF admission. The most significant prognostic implications observed in patients with significant LVEF changes. Trajectory LVEF and type of HF changes are useful tools recommended for prognostication.

Association between the beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, all-cause mortality and length of hospitalization in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To establish an association between beta-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), all-cause mortality, and hospitalization in patients with Heart failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).

METHODS

The present meta-analysis has been performed as per the guidelines of (PRISMA). An inclusive literature search was made without any limitations on language using the electronic databases Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed up to November 2022. The outcomes evaluated in this meta-analysis involved all-cause mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure. The number of patients with HFpEF and their positive outcomes was extracted and analyzed using RevMan software.

RESULTS

In total, 10 articles were included in the present meta-analysis, with a pooled sample size of 12 940 HFpEF patients. In comparison with placebo, both BB and CCB substantially reduced the risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization. However, BB are more effective because they provide a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.43-0.83; p = .002] and hospitalization (RR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.37-0.80; p = .002) as compared with CCB with a risk ratio of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.60-0.98; p = .03) and hospitalization (RR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.44-0.90; p < .00001). A random-effects model was used because of high heterogeneity between the studies (I2  > 70%).

CONCLUSIONS

The current meta-analysis suggests that BBs were more beneficial than CCB in reducing all-cause mortality and hospitalization duration in patients with HFpEF.

Heart failure is associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality after transvenous lead extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is increasingly considered in cardiac implantable electronic device management. Heart failure (HF) might be associated with mortality risks after the TLE procedure. This study aims to assess mortality risk in HF patients undergoing TLE.

METHOD

We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases from inception to June 2022 to identify articles that included patients with and without HF who underwent TLE, which reported mortality in both groups. The pooled effect size was calculated with a random-effects model and 95% CI to compare post-TLE mortality between the two groups.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included in the analysis. Each left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased by 1% was associated with reduced mortality by 2% (HR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99, I 2 = 74.9%, p < .01). The presence of HF compared to those without HF was associated with higher mortality rates (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 2.56-3.61, I 2 = 0.0%, p < .531). There was a significant increase in the mortality rates in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class III (OR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.29-4.06, I 2 = 0.0%, p = .498) and NYHA IV (OR: 8.5, 95% CI: 2.98-24.3, I 2 = 0.0%, p = .997).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that post-TLE mortality decreases by 2% as LVEF increases by 1%, also mortality is higher in patients with NYHA III and IV.

Impact of donor ventricular function on heart transplantation outcomes

BACKGROUND

Some heart transplant (HTx) centers have expanded their donor eligibility criteria in response to the organ shortage; one area of active interest involves utilizing hearts with ventricular dysfunction. Our study seeks to identify if a relationship exists between donor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and ischemic time or donor age on HTx outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis on adult patients who had a HTx between 1996 and 2021 (n = 46,936). Donor LVEF (dLVEF) values were categorized into three groups: <50%, 50%-70%, and >70%. Ischemic time and donor age were stratified into four groups: ≤2.0, 2.1-3.0, 3.1-4.0, >4.0 h, and ≤30, 31-40, 41-50, >50 years, respectively. The outcome of interest was long-term survival.

RESULTS

Multivariable survival analysis found a slight increase in overall mortality risk for patients with donor ejection fractions <50% (HR = 1.16, p = .013). However, subsequent subgroup investigation discovered that this elevated hazard was only applicable when ischemic time was prolonged to >3.0 h (3.1-4.0 h: HR = 1.23, p = .024; > 4.0 h: HR = 1.52, p < .001). There was no significant difference in survival between dLVEF groups when ischemic time was limited to ≤3.0 h or when stratified by donor age.

CONCLUSION

HTx patients with a low donor ejection fraction have comparable survival to recipients with a normal dLVEF when ischemic time is limited to ≤3.0 h. Reduced dLVEF does not appear to be sensitive to advanced donor age. The clinical implications of our study may encourage the recruitment of more donor hearts for transplantation.

Acute Reduction in Left Ventricular Function Following Transcatheter Mitral Edge-to-Edge Repair

Background Little is known about the impact of transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair on changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the effect of an acute reduction in LVEF on prognosis. We aimed to assess changes in LVEF after transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair for both primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (PMR and SMR, respectively), identify rates and predictors of LVEF reduction, and estimate its impact on prognosis. Methods and Results In this international multicenter registry, patients with both PMR and SMR undergoing transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair were included. We assessed rates of acute LVEF reduction (LVEFR), defined as an acute relative decrease of >15% in LVEF, its impact on all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac event (composite end point of all-cause death, mitral valve surgery, and residual mitral regurgitation grade ≥2), and LVEF at 12 months, as well as predictors for LVEFR. Of 2534 patients included (727 with PMR, and 1807 with SMR), 469 (18.5%) developed LVEFR. Patients with PMR were older (79.0±9.2 versus 71.8±8.9 years; P<0.001) and had higher mean LVEF (54.8±14.0% versus 32.7±10.4%; P<0.001) at baseline. After 6 to 12 months (median, 9.9 months; interquartile range, 7.8-11.9 months), LVEF was significantly lower in patients with PMR (53.0% versus 56.0%; P<0.001) but not in patients with SMR. The 1-year mortality was higher in patients with PMR with LVEFR (16.9% versus 9.7%; P<0.001) but not in those with SMR (P=0.236). LVEF at baseline (odds ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]; P=0.002) was predictive of LVEFR for patients with PMR, but not those with SMR (P=0.092). Conclusions Reduction in LVEF is not uncommon after transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair and is correlated with worsened prognosis in patients with PMR but not patients with SMR. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05311163.

Evaluation of the pharmacotherapeutic impact on contractility recovery in patients with newly diagnosed, acute onset dilated cardiomyopathy

In patients with acute onset dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) an improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) can occur as an effect of complex therapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate a pharmacotherapeutic impact on LVEF recovery in newly diagnosed DCM heart failure (HF) patients. A total of 2436 patients hospitalized due to acute decompensated HF were retrospectively analyzed. Finally, 24 patients with newly diagnosed DCM (51.4 ± 16.3 years, New York Heart Association 2.3 ± 0.7, LVEF 25 ± 10%) were observed (13.4 ± 16.0 months) in terms of the result of complex therapy. Patients were divided according to LVEF improvement on follow-up echocardiography: "recovery group" (LVEF improvement > 5%; n = 13) and "nonrecovery group" (∆LVEF ≤ 5%; n = 11). Evaluation of baseline parameters showed lower LVEF (19 ± 6 vs 31 ± 10%; P = .0048) and lower incidence of arterial hypertension (27% vs 73%; P = .043) in "recovery" group. After follow-up period LVEF was similar in both groups; however, significant LVEF improvement was demonstrated only in the "recovery group" (19 ± 6% to 34 ± 8%; P < .001). Only the "recovery group" showed significant HF symptoms reduction (New York Heart Association class: 2.5 ± 0.7 to 1.6 ± 0.6; P = .003). The "recovery group" had prescribed higher doses of loop diuretic (equivalent dose of furosemidum: 80 ± 38 mg vs 43 ± 24 mg; P = .025). Despite optimal therapy, significant LVEF improvement is observed only in the half of the patients with newly diagnosed DCM with HF with reduced EF. Prescription of higher doses of loop diuretics may have positive effect on the reduction of symptoms in newly diagnosed DCM HF patients. Lack of other risk factors such as arterial hypertension may increase the chance of LVEF recovery.

Cardiothoracic ratio and left ventricular ejection fraction relationship: A meta-analysis study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the overall effect size, identify the study with the strongest effect size, and examine the age group with the strongest relationships between the variables.

METHODS

In this study, a meta-analytical analysis was carried out by bringing together 13 studies from around the world examining the statistical relationships between cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Thus, it is hoped that the results will contribute to studies on the relationships between CTR and LVEF and bring a holistic view to these relationships. To determine CTR, studies were identified through a review of the literature, and those that reported a correlation between the variables under investigation were included in the analysis process. The date range of this study 01.11.2022-15.01.2023.

RESULTS

According to the findings, when all the results were analysed together, the mean effect size for CTR and LVEF correlation was found to be r=-0.12. When all studies were considered separately, generally small negative correlations were observed between CTR and LVEF. It is possible to say that there is no publication bias in the studies.

CONCLUSION

This study is a meta-analytic study combining 13 studies examining the statistical relationships between CTR and LVEF. The results of this study are expected to make a valuable contribution to the field of research on the relationship between CTR and LVEF, providing a more comprehensive understanding of these associations. PROSPERO Reg. No.: 392207.

The Use of Empagliflozin Post Myocardial Infarction

Empagliflozin is a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that is mainly used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study's objective was to assess empagliflozin's effects and impacts on post-myocardial patients to highlight its worth in comparison to alternative therapies. Only studies evaluating the effects of empagliflozin on individuals who have undergone a myocardial infarction (MI) are included in this review of the literature, which employed PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. To compare the advantages of empagliflozin for individuals who have recently experienced a myocardial infarction, abstracts from pertinent articles were retrieved, and complete publications were reviewed. A total of four articles were reviewed, which showed that in patients who suffered from a recent MI, empagliflozin caused a significant decrease in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Additionally, it was shown that these individuals had better echocardiographic results for both structural and functional metrics. With studies showing a significantly larger median NT-proBNP decrease with empagliflozin compared to placebo among patients hospitalised with an acute big MI when empagliflozin was started early and administered in addition to the post-MI care suggested by guidelines, it is safe to say that the benefits outweigh the risks. There are currently larger double-blind trials in progress to prove the hypothesis of the benefits of empagliflozin for post-MI patients.

Mindfulness-based stress reduction combined with early cardiac rehabilitation improves negative mood states and cardiac function in patients with acute myocardial infarction assisted with an intra-aortic balloon pump: a randomized controlled trial

Objective

To investigate the clinical effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) intervention combined with early cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) assisted with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP).

Methods

A total of 100 AMI patients with IABP assistance due to hemodynamic instability at Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital were enrolled in the study. The participants were divided into two groups using the random number table method (n = 50 each group). Patients receiving routine CR were assigned to the CR control group, while patients receiving MBSR plus CR were assigned to the MBSR intervention group. The intervention was performed twice a day until the removal of the IABP (5-7 days). Each patient's level of anxiety/depression and negative mood state were evaluated before and after intervention using the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), and profiles of mood state scale (POMS). The results of the control and intervention groups were compared. IABP-related complications and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), measured with echocardiography, were also assessed and compared between the two groups.

Results

The SAS, SDS, and POMS scores were lower in the MBSR intervention group than in the CR control group (P < 0.05). There were also less IABP-related complications in the MBSR intervention group. LVEF was significantly improved in both groups, but the degree of LVEF improvement was more significant in the MBSR intervention group than in the CR control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

MBSR combined with early CR intervention can assist in alleviating anxiety, depression, and other negative mood states, reduce IABP-related complications, and further improve cardiac function in AMI patients with IABP assistance.

Targeting Left Ventricular Mechanics In Patients With Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma: An Updated Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies targeting left ventricular (LV) systolic function by measuring LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) either failed to reveal any impairment of this parameter or found a super-normal systolic function compared to essential hypertensives or normotensive controls. To provide an updated piece of information on LV systolic dysfunction in the PPGL setting, we performed a meta-analysis of speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) studies investigating LV mechanics via global longitudinal strain (GLS), a more sensitive index of LV systolic function than LVEF.

METHODS

A computerized search was performed using PubMed, OVID, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases from inception until September 30, 2022. Full articles reporting data on LV GLS and LVEF in patients with PPGL and controls were considered suitable.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients with PPGL and 187 controls were included in 6 studies. LV GLS was worse in the pooled PPGL group than in the control group (-17.3 ± 1.2 vs. -20.0 ± 0.6) with a standard means difference (SMD) of 1.13 ± 0.36 confidence interval (CI: 0.43-1.84, P = 0.002), whereas this was not the case for LVEF (67.3 ± 1.9 and 66.4 ± 1.6%, respectively), SMD: 0.12 ± 0.03, (CI: -0.41/0.65, P = 0.66). A meta-regression analysis in PPGL patients showed an inverse relationship between adrenergic activity and GLS (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that early changes in LV systolic function not detectable by conventional echocardiography in the PPGL setting can be revealed by STE; therefore, STE implementation in the workup of patients with PPGL may improve the detection of subclinical systolic dysfunction.

Shifting from Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction to Strain Imaging in Aortic Stenosis

Adverse ventricular remodeling is an inflexion point of disease progression in aortic stenosis (AS) and a major determinant of prognosis. Intervention before irreversible myocardial damage is of paramount importance to sustain favorable post-operative outcomes. Current guidelines recommend a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-based strategy to determine the threshold for intervention in AS. However, LVEF has several pitfalls: it denotes the left ventricular cavity volumetric changes and it is not suited to detecting subtle signs of myocardial damage. Strain has emerged as a contemporary imaging biomarker that describes intramyocardial contractile force, providing information on subclinical myocardial dysfunction due to fibrosis. A large body of evidence advocates its use to determine the switch from adaptive to maladaptive myocardial changes in AS, and to refine thresholds for intervention. Although mainly studied in echocardiography, studies exploring the role of strain in multi-detector row computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance are emerging. This review, therefore, summarizes contemporary evidence on the role of LVEF and strain imaging in AS prognosis, aiming to move from an LVEF-based to a strain-based approach for risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making in AS.

Outcomes of catheter ablation vs. medical treatment for atrial fibrillation and heart failure: a meta-analysis

Background

The benefit of catheter ablation vs. medical treatment has been reported to be inconsistent in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) due to different enrollment criteria. This meta-analysis aimed to decipher the differential outcomes stratified by different left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs) and AF types.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, ClinicalKey, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for RCTs comparing medical treatment and catheter ablation in patients with AF and HF published before March 31, 2023. Nine studies were included.

Results

When patients were stratified by LVEF, improved LVEF and 6-min walk distance, less AF recurrence, and lower all-cause mortality in favor of catheter ablation were observed in patients with LVEF ≤50% but not in patients with LVEF ≤35%, and short HF hospitalization was observed in patients with LVEF ≤50% and LVEF ≤35%. When patients were stratified by AF types, improved LVEF and 6-min walk distance, better HF questionnaire score, and short HF hospitalization in favor of catheter ablation were observed both in patients with nonparoxysmal AF and mixed AF (paroxysmal and persistent) and less AF recurrence and lower all-cause mortality in favor of catheter ablation were observed in only patients with mixed AF.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis showed improved LVEF and 6-min walk distance, less AF recurrence, and lower all-cause mortality in favor of catheter ablation vs. medical treatment in AF patients with HF and LVEF of 36%-50%. Compared with medical treatment, catheter ablation improved LVEF and had better HF status in patients with nonparoxysmal AF and mixed AF; however, AF recurrence and all-cause mortality in favor of catheter ablation were observed in only HF patients with mixed AF.

Left bundle branch area pacing in mildly reduced heart failure: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) strategy for heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is controversial. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging pacing modality and an alternative option to CRT. This analysis aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the impact of the LBBAP strategy in HFmrEF, with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 35% and 50%. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for full-text articles on LBBAP from inception to July 17, 2022. The outcomes of interest were QRS duration and LVEF at baseline and follow-up in mid-range heart failure. Data were extracted and summarized. A random-effect model incorporating the potential heterogeneity was used to synthesize the results. Out of 1065 articles, 8 met the inclusion criteria for 211 mid-range heart failure patients with an implant LBBAP across the 16 centers. The average implant success rate with lumenless pacing lead use was 91.3%, and 19 complications were reported among all 211 enrolled patients. During the average follow-up of 9.1 months, the average LVEF was 39.8% at baseline and 50.5% at follow-up (MD: 10.90%, 95% CI: 6.56-15.23, p < .01). Average QRS duration was 152.6 ms at baseline and 119.3 ms at follow-up (MD: -34.51 ms, 95% CI: -60.00 to -9.02, p < .01). LBBAP could significantly reduce QRS duration and improve systolic function in a patient with LVEF between 35% and 50%. Application of LBBAP as a CRT strategy for HFmrEF may be a viable option.

Ejection Fraction, Biomarkers, and Outcomes and Impact of Vericiguat on Outcomes Across EF in VICTORIA

BACKGROUND

Vericiguat reduced the risk of cardiovascular death (CVD) or hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in patients with worsening HF and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

OBJECTIVES

The authors assessed the association of LVEF with biomarker levels, risk of outcome, and whether the effect of vericiguat was homogeneous across LVEF in the VICTORIA (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects with Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) trial.

METHODS

Patients were grouped by LVEF tertiles (≤24%, 25%-33%, and >33%). Patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and efficacy and safety of vericiguat were examined by tertile. Prespecified biomarkers including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, cardiac troponin T, growth differentiation factor 15, interleukin 6, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and cystatin C were examined.

RESULTS

The mean LVEF was 29% ± 8% (range: 5%-45%). A pattern of higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and interleukin 6 was evident in patients in the lowest LVEF tertile vs the other tertiles. Patients with lower LVEF experienced higher rates of the composite outcome (41.7%, 36.3%, and 33.4% for LVEF ≤24, 25-33, and >33; P < 0.001). There was no significant treatment effect heterogeneity of vericiguat across LVEF groups (adjusted HR from lowest to highest tertiles: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.68-0.94]; 0.95 [95% CI: 0.82-1.11]; 0.94 [95% CI: 0.79-1.11]; P for interaction = 0.222), although the HR was numerically lower in the lowest tertile. There was also no heterogeneity of effect for CVD and HF hospitalization individually (P interaction for CVD = 0.964; HF hospitalization = 0.438). Discontinuation of treatment because of adverse events, symptomatic hypotension, or syncope was consistent across the range of LVEF.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lower LVEF had a distinctive biomarker profile and a higher risk for adverse clinical outcomes vs those with a higher LVEF. There was no significant interaction for the benefit of vericiguat across LVEF tertiles, although the largest signal for benefit in both the primary outcome and HF hospitalizations was noted in tertile 1 (LVEF ≤24%). (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects with Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction [VICTORIA]; NCT02861534).

From End-of-Life Care to Improved Quality of Life and Better Prognosis by Using Vericiguat: A Case Report From Costa Rica

In this case report, we present the evolution of a heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patient who was set to receive end-of-life care but demonstrated improvement following treatment with vericiguat in combination with foundational therapy. Vericiguat is a novel soluble guanylate cyclase stimulant that has been proven helpful for treating decompensated heart failure with HFrEF, decreasing hospitalization rates and mortality of cardiovascular causes. This medication is currently indicated in patients who require IV diuretics administration or hospitalization due to decompensated heart failure. This is a case study of a 62-year-old woman with dilated heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), who was a wheelchair user due to severe cardiovascular symptoms and various comorbidities, who was referred to our heart failure program for treatment. Despite previous treatment, the patient experienced persistent cardiovascular symptoms and required palliative care. After optimizing the foundational therapy, the patient's condition improved but continued to require hospitalization. Vericiguat was initiated as an add-on. After six months, the patient's LVEF improved by 9%, and she is now asymptomatic with a considerable decrease in pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels and is wheelchair independent due to enhance exercise resistance. However, the echocardiogram revealed a progression in the dysfunction of both the mitral and aortic valves. The patient's renal function and quality of life scores also changed over time. Vericiguat therapy, as an adjunct to foundational therapy, improved exercise tolerance and symptom relief. However, further investigation is necessary to assess the effects of vericiguat on renal function and disease progression in individuals with HFrEF.

Evaluation of early left-sided cardiac reverse remodeling under combined therapy of sacubitril-valsartan and spironolactone compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and spironolactone

We aimed to compare therapies of sacubitril/valsartan + spironolactone (S/V + S) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors + spironolactone (ACEI + S) on the left-sided cardiac reverse remodeling (L-CRR). The second objective was to analyze the usefulness of GLS and LVEF in response to therapy.

Methods

78 patients (mean age 63.4 years, 20 females) with symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were randomized to groups of equal numbers, i.e., 39 patients, and started on therapy of S/V + S or ACEI + S. Second evaluations were made after 6-8 weeks of therapy.

Results

GLS changed from -7.4% to -9.4% (18% improvement) in both arms equally. More than 50% of patients, initially with very severe systolic dysfunction (GLS > -8%), were reclassified to severe (GLS -8% to -12%). LVEF did not improve in any of the groups. The quality of life measured by MLHFQ and walking distance by 6-MWT increased. Positive correlations between GLS and 6MWT (r = 0.41, p = 0.02) and GLS and MHFLQ (r = 0.42, p = 0.03) were found. The S/V + S subgroup demonstrated improvements in LVEDV (Δ16.7 vs. 4.5 ml), E/e ratio (Δ 2.8 vs. 1.4), and LAVI (Δ 9.4 vs. 8.4 ml/m2) as compared to ACEI + S.

Conclusion

GLS, unlike LVEF, detects early changes in LV systolic function after 6-8 weeks of combined therapy, i.e., SV + S and ACE + S. GLS is more useful than LVEF in assessing early response to treatment. The effect of S/V + S and ACEI + S on LV systolic function was comparable, but the improvement in diastolic function as expressed by E/e', LAVI, and LVEDV was more pronounced with S/V + S.

Clinical course and therapy optimization of patients after discharge from a specialized heart failure clinic

Aim: We aimed to describe the clinical course of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) after discharge from the heart failure clinics (HFC). Patients & methods: We reviewed the hospital's records of 610 patients that were discharged between 2013 and 2018 from the HFC at a single centre. Patients with no recurrent contact to ambulatory cardiac care were invited to an echocardiographic assessment. Results: Of the survivors, 72% were re-referred after discharge. Nearly 30% of the patients with no recurrent contact with ambulatory cardiac care had persistent HFrEF and further therapeutical optimizations were indicated in half of them. Conclusion: This highlights the importance to identify high-risk patients that would benefit from extended management in the HFC.

Left ventricular function and volumes from gated [13N]-ammonia positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: A prospective head-to-head comparison against CMR using a hybrid PET/MR device

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) can be used to evaluate left ventricular (LV) volumes and function. We performed a head-to-head comparison of LV function and volumes obtained simultaneously using [13N]-ammonia-PET and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), with the latter serving as the reference standard.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this prospective study, 51 patients underwent [13N]-ammonia-PET MPI and CMR using a hybrid PET/MR device. Left ventricular end-systolic volumes (LVESV), end-diastolic volumes (LVEDV), stroke volumes (LVSV), ejection fractions (LVEF), and segmental wall motion were analyzed for both methods and were compared using correlational and Bland-Altman (BA) analysis; segmental wall motion was compared using ANOVA. The agreement between [13N]-ammonia-PET and CMR for LVEF was good, with minimal bias (- .6%) and narrow BA limits of agreement (- 7.9% to 6.8%), but [13N]-ammonia-PET systematically underestimated LV volumes, with high bias in LVESV (- 11.2 ml), LVEDV (- 28.9 ml), and LVSV (- 17.5 ml). Mean segmental wall motion in [13N]-ammonia-PET differed significantly among the corresponding normokinetic (6.6 ± 2 mm), hypokinetic (5.1 ± 2 mm), and akinetic (3.3 ± 2 mm) segments in CMR (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

LVEF and LV wall motion can be accurately assessed using [13N]-ammonia-PET MPI, although LV volumes are significantly underestimated compared to CMR.

Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain Following Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction - A Comparison of Primary Coronary Angioplasty and Tenecteplase-Based Pharmacological Reperfusion Strategy

Objective

In the setting of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), reperfusion therapy with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed by an experienced team or pharmacological reperfusion with thrombolytic therapy is highly recommended. Standard echocardiographic measurement of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is widely used to assess left ventricular global systolic function. This study was designed to compare the assessment of global left ventricular function by standard LVEF and global longitudinal strain (GLS) in the two well-known reperfusion strategies.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective single-center observational study in 50 patients with acute STEMI who underwent primary PCI (n = 25) and Tenecteplase (TNK)-based pharmacological reperfusion therapy (n = 25). The primary outcome was left ventricle (LV) systolic function after primary PCI, as assessed by two-dimensional (2D) GLS using speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE), as well as LVEF using standard 2D echocardiogram using Simpson's biplane method.

Results

Overall mean age was 53.7 ± 6.9 years with 88% male gender. The mean door-to-needle time was 29.8 ± 4.2 min in the TNK-based pharmacological reperfusion therapy arm, and the mean door-to-balloon time was 72.9 ± 15.4 min in the primary PCI arm. LV systolic function was significantly better in the primary PCI arm as compared to the TNK-based pharmacological reperfusion therapy, both by 2D STE (mean GLS: -13.6 ± 1.4 vs. -10.3 ± 1.2, P ≤ 0.001) and LVEF (mean LVEF: 42.2 ± 2.9 vs. 39.9 ± 2.7, P = 0.006). There were no significant differences in mortality and inhospital complications in both groups.

Conclusion

Global LV systolic function is significantly better after primary coronary angioplasty as compared to TNK-based pharmacological reperfusion therapy when assessed by routine LVEF and 2D GLS in the setting of acute STEMI.

Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction phenotypes on healthcare-resource utilization in hospitalized heart failure: A secondary analysis of REPORT-HF

BACKGROUND

Evidence on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) for hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced (HFrEF), mildly-reduced (HFmrEF) and preserved (HFpEF) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is limited.

METHODS

We analysed HCRU in relation to LVEF phenotypes, clinical features and in-hospital and 12-month outcomes in 16,943 patients hospitalized for HF in a worldwide registry.

RESULTS

HFrEF was more prevalent (53%) than HFmrEF (17%) or HFpEF (30%). Patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF were older, more often women, with milder symptoms and more comorbidities, but differences were not pronounced. HCRU was high in all three groups; 2 or more in- and out-hospital services were required by 51%, 49% and 52% of patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively, and ICU by 41%, 41% and 37%, respectively.Hospitalization length was similar (median, 8 days). Discharge prescription of neurohormonal inhibitors was <80% for each agent in HFrEF and only slightly lower in HFmrEF and HFpEF (74% and 67%, respectively for beta-blockers). Compared to HFrEF, 12-month all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were lower for HFmrEF [adjusted hazard ratios, 0.76 (0.68-0.84) and 0.77 (0.68-0.88)] and HFpEF [0.62 (0.56-0.68) and 0.60 (0.53-0.68)]; 12-month HF hospitalization was also lower for HFpEF and HFmrEF (21% and 20% versus 25% for HFrEF). In-hospital mortality, 12-month non-cardiovascular mortality and 12-month all-cause hospitalization were similar among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients hospitalized for HF, overall HCRU was similarly high across LVEF spectrum, reflecting the subtle clinical differences among LVEF phenotypes during hospitalization. Discharge prescription of neurohormonal inhibitors were suboptimal in HFrEF and lower but significant in patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF, who had better long-term cardiovascular outcomes than HFrEF, but similar risk for non-cardiovascular events. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.