Comparing Changes in Controlled Substance Prescribing Trends by Provider Type

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Forty-nine out of 50 states have implemented Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) to monitor controlled substance (CS) prescribing. PDMPs change health care provider behavior, but few studies have examined changes in CS prescription by health care provider type.

METHODS

Aggregated yearly data, including number of CS prescriptions, doses, and doses per prescription by health care provider type (physician, advanced practice registered nurse [APRN], and dentist) for each year from 2011 to 2017 was provided by the state PDMP, Kentucky All Schedule Prescription Electronic Reporting System (KASPER). In aggregate, this data set included 64,578,307 total prescriptions and 3,982,130,994 total doses of Schedule II-V medications.

RESULTS

Physicians and dentists showed a trend of decreasing prescriptions and doses for Schedule II opioids from 2012 to 2017 (27-32% reduction in 2017 compared to 2011). APRNs showed a substantive increase in the number of doses and prescriptions (121-204% increase in 2017 compared to 2011), with increases remaining when controlling for number of providers. Physicians increased doses and prescriptions of Schedule II stimulants (37% increase for both doses and prescriptions), but by a smaller magnitude than APRN increases in stimulants (334-360% increase). Dentists showed decreases in Schedule II stimulants prescribed (69-80% reduction). Similar trends, but more modest in magnitude, were observed for Schedule III-IV.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Although monitoring and continuing education requirements are similar across all providers in Kentucky, differences in prescription trends for Schedule II opioids and stimulants were noted for physicians, APRNs, and dentists.

SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

Changes in prescribing following introduction of mandatory use of KASPER markedly differed based on provider type, with increases observed for APRNs compared with physicians and dentists. These findings advance prior research by providing a detailed examination of prescribing trends by provider type subsequent to a PDMPs mandatory use law. (Am J Addict 2019;00:00-00).

Barriers to Accessing Internationally Controlled Essential Medicines in Uganda: A Qualitative Study

CONTEXT

Access to internationally controlled essential medicines is a problem worldwide. More than five billion people cannot access opioids for pain and palliative care or do not have access to surgical care or anesthetics, 25 million people living with epilepsy do not have access to their medicines, and 120,000 women die annually owing to postpartum hemorrhage. In Uganda, access to controlled medicines is also problematic, but a lack of data on factors that influence access exists.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to identify the social, cultural, and regulatory barriers that influence access to internationally controlled essential medicines in Uganda.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews with 15 key stakeholders with knowledge on controlled medicines from relevant institutions in Uganda. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the Access to Medicines from a Health System Perspective framework.

RESULTS

Barriers in accessing controlled medicines were experienced owing to lack of prioritization, difficulties in finding the balance between access and control, deficiencies in the workings of the estimate and distribution system, lack of knowledge, inadequate human resources, expenses related to use and access, and stigma. It was believed that some abuse of specific controlled medicines occurred.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this research indicate that to improve access to internationally controlled essential medicines in Uganda, health system strengthening is needed on multiple fronts. Active engagement and concerted efforts are needed from all stakeholders to ensure access and prevent abuse.

The lock-in loophole: Using mixed methods to explain patient circumvention of a Medicaid opioid restriction program

BACKGROUND

Lock-in programs are proliferating among private and public payers to restrict access to controlled substance prescriptions and enhance care coordination for patients exhibiting high-risk use of, primarily, opioids. Patients enrolled in lock-in programs are required to seek opioids from a designated provider and pharmacy for insurance coverage of their opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions. Lock-in program restrictions are often circumvented by patients through out-of-pocket cash purchases of opioid prescriptions, undermining the program's intended function. This study sought to construct and explain trajectories of Medicaid-covered and cash pay opioid prescription fills among adults enrolled in an opioid lock-in program. Methods: We used sequential explanatory mixed methods, which involved a quantitative retrospective cohort analysis of opioid fill trajectories using North Carolina Medicaid administrative claims data linked with state prescription drug monitoring program data, followed by qualitative semi-structured interviews with North Carolina pharmacists. The quantitative component included adults enrolled in the North Carolina Medicaid lock-in program between 10/1/2010-3/31/2012. The qualitative component included a maximum variation sample of community pharmacists in North Carolina delivering care to lock-in patients. Quantitative outcomes included group-based trajectories of monthly Medicaid-covered and cash pay opioid prescription fills six months before and after LIP enrollment, and qualitative analyses generated themes explaining observed trajectories. Results: Two-thirds of subjects exhibited reduced Medicaid-covered opioid prescription fills and no increase in cash pay fills after lock-in enrollment, with one-third exhibiting increased cash pay fills after lock-in. Pharmacists attributed increases in cash pay fills primarily to illicit behaviors, while some cash pay behavior likely reflected new unintended barriers to care. Conclusions: Lock-in programs appear to reduce prescription opioid use for most enrolled patients. However, lock-in programs may have limited capacity to deter illicit behaviors among patients intent on abusing, misusing, or diverting these medications and may introduce new access barriers to necessary care for some.

Evaluation of Opioid Prescribing Habits Based on Analysis of a State Prescription Drug Monitoring Program

BACKGROUND

The current opioid epidemic is perhaps the greatest public health crisis in the United States. Although multiple factors led to the rise of this epidemic, it is without question associated with the rise in opioid prescribing.

OBJECTIVES

Better understanding of the opioid prescribing may provide insights into population-level trends contributing to this epidemic, and opportunities to decrease the magnitude of opioid overdose-related death. Therefore we assessed trends in opioid prescribing habits based on analysis of the Texas Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) and geographic, ethnic, and income-related data from the US Census Bureau.

STUDY DESIGN

Multiple linear regression analysis of Texas PDMP and US Census Bureau data were performed to assess for correlations to opioid prescribing based on geographic, ethnic, income, and time-related variables.

SETTING

All controlled substances prescribed in the state of Texas from April 2015 to May 2018 were analyzed.

METHODS

We obtained data from the Texas PDMP for all controlled substances from April 2015 to May 2018. We performed multiple linear regression analysis of these data along with US Census Bureau data to assess for correlations based on geographic, ethnic, income, and time-related variables. We hypothesized that there would be substantial variability in opioid prescribing habits based on geographic, ethnic, and economic variables.

RESULTS

Approximately 200 million pills of controlled substances were prescribed per month over the studied time frame. Overall, high geographic variability was noted, and this strongly correlated to race and ethnicity. Opioid prescribing increased along with the proportion of white residents within a county, but a similar negative correlation was noted with increasing Hispanic population proportion. This correlation was noted throughout the study period, but up until 2017, lower income levels among higher white population had even higher correlation with increased opioid prescribing. Cumulative opioid prescriptions throughout the state fell beginning in 2017.

LIMITATIONS

This analysis does not include opioids obtained illicitly or from prescriptions outside the state of Texas. The specificity of geographic data are limited to the county level due to irregular entry of zip code data by prescribing pharmacies.

CONCLUSIONS

In the state of Texas over the studied time period, there was strong correlation for higher rates of opioid prescribing as white population increased despite overall decreased opioid prescribing starting in 2017. Until 2017, this correlation grew stronger as low-income white population increased.

KEY WORDS

Opioid, opioid epidemic, opioid utilization.

New Mexico Nurse-Midwives' Controlled Substance Prescribing and Monitoring Practices

INTRODUCTION

New Mexico, a state with a high incidence of opioid overdose deaths, requires certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) who prescribe controlled substances to use the statewide Prescription Monitoring Program (PMP). This study examined how frequently CNMs who practice in New Mexico and prescribe controlled substances use the PMP and the purposes for which they use it.

METHODS

All CNMs licensed in New Mexico (N = 210) were sent a link to an anonymous online survey. CNM demographics, practice characteristics, and controlled substance prescribing practices were examined.

RESULTS

Approximately 40% of CNMs licensed in New Mexico completed the survey (N = 83), 77% of whom (64/83) were providing direct clinical care services. Nearly all who were engaged in clinical care had a US Drug Enforcement Administration registration number and were registered in the PMP (97%; 62/64). Approximately 90% of those respondents (56/62) reported prescribing controlled substances. Approximately 10% (6/62) never logged into the PMP, 40% (25/62) never ran a self-report, and nearly 30% (18/62) reported never checking the PMP for patient alerts. Among those who reported prescribing controlled substances, the percentages who never logged in, never ran a self-report, and never checked for patient alerts were 7% (4/56), 37% (21/56), and 27% (15/56), respectively. Nearly half of those prescribing controlled substances (26/56) did so monthly or more often, but with respect to their own prescribing, approximately one-third of them (9/26) checked the PMP less frequently than every 6 months.

DISCUSSION

Most CNMs in New Mexico are authorized to prescribe controlled substances, but the frequency of prescribing varies, and some CNMs may not be making optimal use of the state PMP for self-reports, for patient alerts, or prior to prescribing a controlled substance. Additional education pertaining to the PMP is needed, as are best practice recommendations for monitoring CNMs' controlled substance prescribing.

The Surprising Reach of FDA Regulation of Cannabis, Even After Descheduling

As more states legalize cannabis, the push to "deschedule" it from the Controlled Substances Act is gaining momentum. At the same time, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved the first conventional drug containing a cannabinoid derived from cannabis—cannabidiol (CBD) for two rare seizure disorders. This would all seem to bode well for proponents of full federal legalization of medical cannabis. But some traditional providers are wary of drug companies pulling medical cannabis into the regular small molecule drug development system. The FDA's focus on precise analytical characterization and on individual active and inactive ingredients may be fundamentally inconsistent with the "entourage effects" theory of medical cannabis. Traditional providers may believe that descheduling cannabis would free them to promote and distribute their products free of federal intervention, both locally and nationally. Other producers appear to assume that descheduling would facilitate a robust market in cannabis-based edibles and dietary supplements. In fact, neither of these things is true. If cannabis were descheduled, the FDA's complex and comprehensive regulatory framework governing foods, drugs, and dietary supplements would preclude much of this anticipated commerce. For example, any medical claims about cannabis would require the seller to complete the rigorous new drug approval process, the cost of which will be prohibitive for most current traditional providers. Likely also unexpected to some, there is no pathway forward for conventional foods containing cannabis constituents, with the (probably exclusive) exception of certain hemp seed ingredients, if those foods cross state lines. And it will certainly come as a shock to many that federal law already prohibits the sale of dietary supplements containing CBD--including those already on the market as well as those made from "hemp," which has recently been descheduled under the 2018 Farm Bill. This Article describes in detail the surprising reach of the FDA and then outlines three modest, but legal, pathways forward for cannabis-based products in a world where cannabis has been descheduled.

International Guidelines on Human Rights and Drug Control: A Tool for Securing Women's Rights in Drug Control Policy

Discrimination and inequality shape women's experiences of drug use and in the drug trade and the impact of drug control efforts on them, with disproportionate burdens faced by poor and otherwise marginalized women. In recent years, UN member states and UN drug control and human rights entities have recognized this issue and made commitments to integrate a 'gender perspective' into drug control policies, with 'gender' limited to those conventionally deemed women. But the concept of gender in international law is broader, rooted in socially constructed and culturally determined norms and expectations around gender roles, sex, and sexuality. Also, drug control policies often fail to meaningfully address the specific needs and circumstances of women (inclusively defined), leaving them at risk of recurrent violations of their rights in the context of drugs. This article explores what it means to 'mainstream' this narrower version of gender into drug control efforts, using as examples various women's experiences as people who use drugs, in the drug trade, and in the criminal justice system. It points to international guidelines on human rights and drug control as an important tool to ensure attention to women's rights in drug control policy design and implementation.

Revision of Import and Export Requirements for Controlled Substances, Listed Chemicals, and Tableting and Encapsulating Machines, Including Changes To Implement the International Trade Data System (ITDS); Revision of Reporting Requirements for Domestic Transactions in Listed Chemicals and Tableting and Encapsulating Machines; and Technical Amendments. Final rule

The Drug Enforcement Administration is updating its regulations for the import and export of tableting and encapsulating machines, controlled substances, and listed chemicals, and its regulations relating to reports required for domestic transactions in listed chemicals, gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, and tableting and encapsulating machines. In accordance with Executive Order 13563, the Drug Enforcement Administration has reviewed its import and export regulations and reporting requirements for domestic transactions in listed chemicals (and gamma-hydroxybutyric acid) and tableting and encapsulating machines, and evaluated them for clarity, consistency, continued accuracy, and effectiveness. The amendments clarify certain policies and reflect current procedures and technological advancements. The amendments also allow for the implementation, as applicable to tableting and encapsulating machines, controlled substances, and listed chemicals, of the President's Executive Order 13659 on streamlining the export/import process and requiring the government-wide utilization of the International Trade Data System (ITDS). This rule additionally contains amendments that implement recent changes to the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (CSIEA) for reexportation of controlled substances among members of the European Economic Area made by the Improving Regulatory Transparency for New Medical Therapies Act. The rule also includes additional substantive and technical and stylistic amendments.

ASSESSMENT OF PRACTICE AT RETAIL PHARMACIES IN PAKISTAN: EXTENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE PREVAILING DRUG LAW OF PAKISTAN

The main objective of this study was to assess the practice at retail pharmacies in Pakistan and to compare the same in rural and urban areas. The maintenance of pharmacy and drug inspectors' visit was also assessed. This cross sectional study was conducted in Abbottabad, Pakistan during October-November, 2012. A sample of 215 drug sellers or drug stores was selected by employing convenient sampling method. With a response rate of 91.6%, 197 drug sellers participated in this study. All the drug sellers were male. Overall, 35% (n = 197) of the drug sellers did not have any professional qualification. A majority of the drug sellers were involved in various malpractices like selling of medicines without prescription (80.7%), prescribing practice (60.9%), prescription intervention (62.4%) and selling of controlled substances (66%) without a license for selling it. These malpractices were significantly higher in rural area than that in urban area.

Stakeholders' Views on Barriers to Research on Controversial Controlled Substances

Many diseases and disease symptoms still lack effective treatment. At the same time, certain controversial Schedule I drugs, such as heroin and cannabis, have been reputed to have considerable therapeutic potential for addressing significant medical problems. Yet, there is a paucity of U.S. clinical studies on the therapeutic uses of controlled drugs. For example, people living with HIV/AIDS experience a variety of disease- and medication-related symptoms. Their chronic pain is intense, frequent, and difficult to treat. Nevertheless, clinical trials of compassionate management for their chronic symptoms, which should be a research priority, are stymied. We employed qualitative methods to develop an understanding of the barriers to research on potential therapeutic uses of Schedule I drugs so that they might be addressed. We elicited the perspectives of key stakeholder groups that would be involved in such studies: people living with HIV/AIDS, clinicians, and members of institutional review boards. As we identified obstacles to research, we found that all of the stakeholder groups arrived at the same conclusion, that clinical research on the therapeutic potential of these drugs is ethically required.

An Ethical Exploration of Barriers to Research on Controlled Drugs

We examine the ethical, social, and regulatory barriers that may hinder research on therapeutic potential of certain controversial controlled substances like marijuana, heroin, or ketamine. Hazards for individuals and society and potential adverse effects on communities may be good reasons for limiting access and justify careful monitoring of these substances. Overly strict regulations, fear of legal consequences, stigma associated with abuse and populations using illicit drugs, and lack of funding may, however, limit research on their considerable therapeutic potential. We review the surprisingly sparse literature and address the particular ethical concerns pertinent to research with illicit and addictive substances, such as undue inducement, informed consent, therapeutic misconception, and risk to participants, researchers, and institutions. We consider the perspectives of key research stakeholders and explore whether they may be infected with bias. We conclude by proposing an empirical research agenda to provide an evidentiary basis for ethical reasoning.

Structured Development and Promotion of a Research Field: Hormesis in Biology, Toxicology, and Environmental Regulatory Science

The ability of powerful and well-funded interest groups to steer scientific research in ways that advance their goals has become a significant social concern. This steering ability is increasingly being recognized in the peer-reviewed scientific literature and in findings of deliberative scientific bodies. This paper provides a case study that illustrates some of the major strategies that can be used to structure and advance a controversial research field. It focuses on hormesis, described as a type of dose-response relationship in toxicology and biology showing low-dose stimulation but high-dose inhibition, or the reverse. Hormesis proponents tout its significance, arguing that substances toxic at high doses and beneficial at lower doses should be regulated less stringently. We identify five strategies employed by hormesis proponents to foster its acceptance: (1) creating institutions focused on supporting hormesis; (2) developing terminology, study designs, and data interpretations that cast it in a favorable light; (3) using bibliometric techniques and surveys to attract attention; (4) aggressively advocating for the phenomenon and challenging critics; and (5) working with outside interest groups to apply the hormesis phenomenon in the economic and political spheres. We also suggest a number of oversight strategies that can be implemented to help promote credible and socially responsible research in cases like this one.