Comparative immunogenicity and safety of two dosing schedules of a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in healthy adolescent volunteers: an open, randomised study

An open, randomised study was undertaken to demonstrate the equivalence in immunogenicity and to determine the reactogenicity and safety of two dosing schedules (0, 6 or 0, 12 month) of an adult formulation of a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine containing 720 EL.U. of inactivated hepatitis A antigen and 20 microg of hepatitis B surface antigen (Twinrix, SmithKline Beecham Biologicals, Belgium) in 240 healthy volunteers aged 12-15 years. The vaccine was well tolerated when administered using either vaccination schedule. At month 7, 98.1% of subjects completing the 0, 6 month vaccination schedule were seroprotected against hepatitis B (anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) > or =10 mIU/ml) and 100% were seropositive for anti-hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) antibodies (i.e., > or =33 mIU/ml). The corresponding geometric mean titres (GMTs) were 2791 mIU/ml for anti-HBs and 5992 mIU/ml for anti-HAV antibodies. At month 13, 97% of subjects assigned to the 0, 12 month vaccination schedule were protected against hepatitis B and 99% were seropositive for anti-HAV antibodies. The corresponding GMTs were 4340 and 8472 mIU/ml, respectively. A combined response (i.e., subjects, who were seropositive for anti-HAV antibodies and seroprotected for anti-HBs antibodies) was achieved in 98% of subjects vaccinated according to the 0, 6 month interval and in 96% of subjects vaccinated using the 0, 12 month schedule. The reactogenicity of both vaccination schedules was also equivalent. The results thus show that the combined hepatitis A and B vaccine can be administered using flexible vaccination intervals, which make it suitable for use in large-scale hepatitis immunisation programmes.

A prospective, randomized, comparative US trial of a combination hepatitis A and B vaccine (Twinrix) with corresponding monovalent vaccines (Havrix and Engerix-B) in adults

In an open, randomized, multicenter, controlled clinical trial in the US, 773 adults were administered either a combination hepatitis vaccine (Twinrix: 720 EL.U inactivated hepatitis A antigen and 20 mcg recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen per milliliter) on a 0, 1, 6 month schedule or corresponding monovalent vaccines concurrently (Havrix, 1440 EL.U/ml of hepatitis A antigen at 0, 6 months and Engerix-B, 20 mcg of hepatitis B surface antigen at 0, 1, 6 months). Non-inferiority testing for the primary endpoint, severe soreness, and equivalence testing for the secondary endpoints, anti-HAV seroconversion and anti-HBs seroprotection, showed that safety and immunogenicity were comparable in the two groups.

Long-term persistence of antibodies induced by vaccination and safety follow-up, with the first combined vaccine against hepatitis A and B in children and adults

It is important to monitor the long-term persistence of antibodies induced by vaccination. Four cohorts were followed for their long-term immunity after vaccination with a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine (Twinrix; SmithKline Beecham Biologicals, Rixsenart, Belgium). Two cohorts of adults (ages 17-60 years), one of 1-6-year-olds, and one of 6-15-year-olds were vaccinated following a 0, 1, and 6-month schedule. Follow-up data until month 72 (adults) and month 60 (children) are available. At month 72, antibody to hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) seropositivity (S+) was 100% for both adult cohorts (n = 40 and n = 47) and 95% and 89% of the vaccinees were seroprotected against hepatitis B virus (HBV), respectively. The geometric mean titres (GMTs; mIU/ml) for anti-HAV were 977 and 542 and the GMTs for the antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) were 322 and 90. For 1-6-year-olds at month 60 (n = 39), anti-HAV S+ was 100% with a GMT of 479 and 97% were protected against HBV with a GMT of 195. At month 60 for the 6-15-year-olds (n = 42), anti-HAV S+ was 100% with a GMT of 990 and 95% were protected against HBV with a GMT of 263. There have been no safety issues during the follow-up. In the past 5 years, a postmarketing surveillance system was available. Using this system, all spontaneous adverse events are collected and archived. Although infrequent, the most commonly reported adverse events after more than 13 million doses were allergic-type reactions followed by fever and injection site reactions. The combined hepatitis A and B vaccine is safe and is well tolerated. Immunity provided by the vaccine remains high in adults and children with comparable results to those obtained with monovalent vaccines.

[Prevalence of antibodies against hepatitis A virus in a population from northern Portugal]

AIM

To find the prevalence of antibody to hepatitis A virus in the population of the North of Portugal.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten General Practitioners were asked to provide blood samples from patients who would need blood tests for any reason other than acute hepatitis, during January and February 1996. In this way, 381 samples were obtained for assessment of anti hepatitis A virus antibodies using a commercial radioimmunassay ELISA. All subjects gave their informed consent and answered to a protocol regarding age, sex, geographic area, number of people per household and sewage systems. The statistics were performed using SPSS.

RESULTS

The 381 subjects were distributed into eight age groups: I (1-4 years)--57; II (5-9 years)--57; III (10-14 years)--26; IV (15-19 years)--41; V (20-29 years)--55; VI (30-39 years)--51; VII (40-49 years)--41; VIII--(equal or more than 50 years)--53. The prevalence of anti HAV antibodies per group-percentage (number), (confidence intervals), were: I--7.0% (4) (3-17%); II--15.8% (9), (9-27%); III--26.9% (7) (14-46%); IV--51.2% (21) (37-66%); V--85.5% (47) (74-92%); VI--72.5% (37) (59-83%); VII--87.8% (36) (75-95%); VIII--88.7% (47) (80-93%).

CONCLUSION

The comparison with previous data (Lecour et al.) shows improvement in sanitary conditions of population, with associated lower prevalence of anti hepatitis A virus antibody.

Vaccination against hepatitis A in children aged 12 to 24 months [corrected]

BACKGROUND

Current hepatitis A vaccines are either licensed for children >2 years of age, as in the U.S. or Chile, or >1 year of age, as in Europe and other parts of the world. Recent recommendations for immunization against hepatitis A have included routine vaccination of children in areas or regions of higher endemicity. However, data on hepatitis A vaccination in toddlers aged between 1 and 2 years are scarce.

METHODS

This open clinical study investigated the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of two doses (0, 6-month schedule) of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix pediatric, Glaxco SmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) in 120 seronegative children aged 12-24 months.

RESULTS

Pain at the injection site and irritability were the most frequently reported local and general symptoms, respectively. No serious adverse events related to the study vaccine were reported. One month after the first dose, all but one subject had antibodies against hepatitis A with a GMT of 159 mIU/mL. After the booster dose, all had antibodies with a GMT of 2,939 mIU/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine was well tolerated by these toddlers and that the vaccine elicits a good immune response.

A randomised comparison of two inactivated hepatitis A vaccines, Avaxim and Vaqta, given as a booster to subjects primed with Avaxim

To investigate whether Vaqta may be used as a booster in subjects primed with Avaxim, 127 adults primed 6 months previously with Avaxim were randomised to receive either Vaqta or Avaxim as a booster. Prior to the booster all subjects were seropositive. Geometric mean antibody titres increased from 496 to 7262 mIU/mL 1 month after receiving Vaqta as a booster and from 325 to 5131 mIU/mL 1 month after receiving Avaxim as a booster. Both vaccines were well tolerated; 20.3% of subjects receiving Vaqta experienced a local reaction, compared to 39.7% of those receiving Avaxim. Systemic reactions were reported by 15.6% of those receiving Vaqta and 14.3% of those receiving Avaxim. Vaqta may be used as a booster in subjects primed with Avaxim.

Hepatitis A vaccine in pediatric patients affected by metabolic liver diseases

Twenty children with a variety of metabolic liver diseases were given two doses of hepatitis A vaccine. Adverse reactions were mild. All subjects responded to vaccine with seroconversion to hepatitis A virus antibodies after the first dose, regardless of transaminase values, and had a booster effect from the second doses.

Safety and efficacy of hepatitis A vaccination in liver transplantation recipients

OBJECTIVE

Vaccination against hepatitis A (HAV) has been shown to be safe and effective in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). The safety and efficacy of HAV vaccines in liver transplant (OLT) recipients have not been established. The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in OLT recipients.

METHODS

Thirty-seven HAV seronegative OLT recipients were enrolled. Patients received two doses of vaccine 6 months apart. Postvaccination IgG anti-HAV were determined at 1, 6, and 7 months after the first vaccine dose. Side effects were monitored for 3 days after each vaccination shot. An unvaccinated control group (45 patients) was followed for evidence of seroconversion. Seroconversion rate was also compared with those reported in healthy patients and in patients with chronic liver disease.

RESULTS

Testing was available for all the cases at 1 month, and for 26 and 23 patients at 6 and 7 months, respectively. Only 3 of 37 patients (8%) had seroconversion at 1 month. At 6- and 7-month time points, 5 of 26 (19%) and 6 of the 23 (26%) patients had seroconversion, respectively. Vaccine responders had higher total white blood cell count and lymphocyte count and were further out from transplant compared with nonresponders. None of the unvaccinated patients had seroconversion over the follow-up time. Seroconversion rates in OLT recipients were significantly lower than that reported in healthy individuals (P=0.001) or in pre-OLT patients with CLD (P=0.001). All patients tolerated the vaccine well.

CONCLUSIONS

HAV vaccination is safe in OLT recipient. Efficacy of HAV vaccination in OLT recipients, as measured by a commercially available enzyme immunoassay, is low and alternative strategies should be developed to improve response rate.

Cost analysis of two strategies for hepatitis A vaccination of hospital health-care personnel in an intermediate endemicity area

The aim of the study was to carry out a cost analysis to allow the comparison of the cost of two vaccination strategies against Hepatitis A in health-care personnel. A total of 423 health-care workers were recruited at one General Hospital of Madrid, Spain. Blood specimens were obtained for anti-HAV antibody determination. The prevalence of anti-HAV antibody was 40% (95% CI: 35-45) and it was directly correlated with age. Cost analysis determined that the critical value of prevalence for vaccination with HAV vaccine was 23%. In hospital health-care workers < or =30 years in age, vaccination with HAV vaccine (without screening) would be the less costly strategy. In those >30 years in age, it would be less costly to screen for anti-HAV antibody first and vaccinate those who are antibody-negative.

An open study of subcutaneous administration of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (VAQTA) in adults: safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity

A number of patients in clinical practice would be candidates for hepatitis A vaccine administered subcutaneously (SC), including patients with inherited and acquired coagulopathies. To assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of VAQTA (Hepatitis A Vaccine, Inactivated, Merck and Co. Inc., West Point, PA) was administered SC to healthy adults. A total of 114 healthy adults received two doses of vaccine SC 24 weeks apart. No serious vaccine-related adverse experiences were reported. Four weeks after dose 1, the seropositivity rate (SPR) was 77.9% (CI, 69.1, 85.1%). The geometric mean titer (GMT) was 21.0 mIU/ml. Twenty-four weeks after dose 1 (just prior to dose 2) and 28 weeks after dose 1 (4 weeks following dose 2), the SPRs were 95.3% [corrected] and 100%, respectively; the GMTs were 153.2 and 1563.9 mIU/mL, respectively [corrected]. Although the kinetics of the immune response were slower when VAQTA was administered SC compared to intramuscular injection, SPRs and GMTs increased over time, indicating that the vaccine administered SC demonstrated immunogenicity.

Immunogenicity of hepatitis A vaccination in decompensated cirrhotic patients

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination is recommended in chronic liver disease because of an increased morbidity and mortality associated with HAV superinfection. However, data regarding the efficacy of HAV vaccination in patients with advanced chronic liver disease is limited. We assessed the efficacy of a standard HAV vaccination schedule in decompensated chronic liver disease in comparison with compensated disease and defined clinical predictors associated with seroconversion. Eighty-four anti-HAV antibody-negative patients, 49 with compensated liver disease, and 35 with decompensated disease were enrolled. Seroconversion was measured by qualitative and quantitative anti-HAV antibody measurements 1 month after each vaccine dose, and univariate/multivariate analysis was performed to define clinical predictors associated with seroconversion. One month after the primary dose, 71.4% of patients with compensated liver disease had detectable anti-HAV antibody compared with 37.1% with decompensated liver disease (P <.05). One month after the booster dose, 98% of compensated patients seroconverted compared with 65.7% with decompensated disease (P <.05). The median serum antibody concentration in compensated liver disease was 76.4 mIU/mL at month 1 and 327.91 mIU/mL at month 7 compared with 20.0 mIU/mL and 102.57 mIU/mL, respectively, in decompensated disease. On multivariate analysis, Child-Pugh class was the only factor predicting response to vaccination. Seroconversion after HAV vaccination was significantly less common in decompensated liver disease and the presence of advanced disease (Child-Pugh class B/C) predicted a lower response rate. These findings indicate that the response to HAV vaccination in chronic liver disease is optimal when targeted to patients before the development of hepatic decompensation.

Seroepidemiology of hepatitis A infection in India: changing pattern

OBJECTIVE

Recent changes in the epidemiology of hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection and the availability of effective vaccines have renewed interest in this infection. We determined the age-related prevalence of anti-HAV antibodies in India and looked for differences by known risk factors for HAV infection.

METHODS

In this prospective study, serum samples obtained from 1612 subjects aged 1 to 60 at six centers in five cities (Calcutta, Cochin, Indore, Jaipur and Patna) during the period February to August 1998 were tested for anti-HAV antibodies. Demographic and socio-economic information was obtained by questionnaire.

RESULTS

The overall seroprevalence rate was 65.9%, varying from 26.2% to 85.3% in various cities; there was no difference between males and females. Seropositivity increased with age from 52.2% in the 1-5 year age group to 80.8% in those aged 16 years or more. Seroprevalence rates were significantly lower in those aged 1-5 years compared with other age groups (p<0.0001). There was no difference in seroprevalence between those with monthly family income <Rs 5000 and >Rs 5001. Multivariate analysis showed that anti-HAV seroprevalence varied significantly by source of water supply, being highest when the supply was municipal.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate an epidemiological pattern of intermediate endemicity. This finding has public health implications as it indicates that a significant proportion of the Indian adolescent and adult population is at risk of HAV infection.

Molecular epidemiology of hepatitis A virus in Korea

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of antibodies for hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) in adolescents and young adults has decreased remarkably following the economic growth in Korea. As a result, this age group has a high risk for HAV infection paradoxically, and over 1500 cases of clinically overt hepatitis A occurred in 1998. Human isolates of hepatitis A virus (HAV) are categorized within four genotypes (I, II, III, and VII). In some geographic regions, closely related isolates cluster, suggesting endemic spread of the virus, while in other regions multiple genotypes circulate. Virtually no data are available with regard to the genetic relatedness of Korean strains of HAV.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 168 base pair segment encompassing the putative VP1/2A junction of the HAV genome was amplified by RT-PCR and sequenced in sera of 18 Korean patients with a sporadic form of acute hepatitis A. Pairwise comparisons of the nucleic acid and amino acid sequences of 18 Korean isolates with one another revealed that the Korean isolates showed > 94.6% and > 96.4% identity, respectively. All of the 18 Korean isolates clustered within genotype IA, irrespective of the geographic locations and the time that hepatitis occurred. Unique amino acid sequence changes that had never been reported in genotype IA were found in nine of the 18 isolates. These changes were Gln-->Ser and Lys-->Arg in 2A-19 and 2A-10 amino acid positions.

CONCLUSION

The presence of single genotype and unique mutations may be related with the circulation of endemic HAV over a long period of time in Korea.

An outbreak of hepatitis A associated with green onions

Forty-three cases of serologically confirmed hepatitis A occurred among individuals who ate at restaurant A in Ohio in 1998. Serum samples from all restaurant A employees who worked during the exposure period were negative for IgM antibodies to hepatitis A virus (HAV). A matched case-control study determined that foods containing green onions, which were eaten by 38 (95%) of 40 case patients compared with 30 (50%) of 60 control subjects, were associated with illness (matched odds ratio, 12.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-60.8). Genetic sequences of viral isolates from 14 case patients were identical to each other and to those of viral isolates from 3 patients with cases of hepatitis A acquired in Mexico. Although the implicated green onions, which could have come from one of 2 Mexican farms or from a Californian farm, were widely distributed, no additional green onion-associated cases were detected. More sensitive methods are needed to detect foodborne hepatitis A. A better understanding of how HAV might contaminate raw produce would aid in developing prevention strategies.

Detection of antibodies to HAV 3C proteinase in experimentally infected chimpanzees and in naturally infected children

Commercial assays for the diagnosis of hepatitis A detect antibody to hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV), but they cannot discriminate between antibody resulting from infection and antibody induced by inactivated vaccine. With the licensing and increasing use of inactivated hepatitis A vaccines, there is a need for a test to distinguish between infection and vaccination. Since antibodies to viral non-structural proteins are elicited by infection but not by vaccination with inactivated vaccine, we developed and evaluated a test for such antibodies. The antibody response to the non-structural 3C proteinase (anti-3C) of virus HAV was studied by ELISA in chimpanzees experimentally infected with virulent (wild type) or with attenuated HAV strains and in children who received inactivated HAV vaccine or placebo during a vaccination trial in Nicaragua. Anti-3C was detected in 89% of 18 chimpanzees infected with wild-type HAV strains and 27% of 26 chimpanzees infected with attenuated HAV strains. There was a direct correlation between severity of hepatitis and magnitude of the anti-3C response. In the vaccine trial, anti-3C was detected only in children who were infected with HAV during the study; IgG anti-3C persisted for at least 15 months after infection in one child. Vaccinated and uninfected children remained negative for anti-3C. The anti-3C response can be regarded as an indicator of viral replication. Its detection should be useful for distinguishing between antibody acquired in response to HAV infection and antibody induced by immunization with inactivated vaccine.

Solvent/detergent treatment does not alter the tolerance or uptake of human normal immunoglobulin for intramuscular injection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a solvent/detergent-treated intramuscular immunoglobulin were compared with those of the standard product.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single, 750-mg intramuscular (i.m.) injections were administered to a total of 36 healthy individuals: 23 in a double-blind trial and 13 in an open trial. Changes in specific serum hepatitis A and hepatitis B antibodies were monitored for a period of up to 3 months postinjection.

RESULTS

No serious adverse reactions were reported, and the bioavailability of the solvent/detergent-treated preparation was equivalent to that of the standard i.m. immunoglobulin.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence that solvent/detergent treatment alters the pharmacokinetics or tolerance of human normal immunoglobulin, but it offers additional assurance against potential virus transmission.

The presence of hepatitis A antibodies in dental workers. A seroepidemiologic study

BACKGROUND

The licensing of hepatitis A vaccine in the United States and other countries in the 1990s raised the question of vaccine candidates. The authors undertook a study to evaluate the presence of antibodies against hepatitis A virus, or HAV, in dental workers.

METHODS

The authors recruited 115 members of the dental staff of Tel Aviv University: 82 dentists, 21 dental assistants, eight dental hygienists and four laboratory technicians. The subjects completed a structured questionnaire regarding demographic information (such as age, sex, number of siblings, number of children) and occupational characteristics. Venous blood was obtained and examined for presence of immunoglobulin G antibodies to HAV by microparticle enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

Univariant analysis (chi 2 and Student t test) and multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis were used to identify variables that were associated with seropositivity. Greater number of years of occupation in dentistry were independently and significantly (P = .0004) associated with seropositivity to HAV. The calculated odds ratio showed that each year of work increased the likelihood of being seropositive by 1.06 (6 percent). Subjects tended to have higher seropositive rates if they were older, had a greater number of children, had a greater number of siblings, had worked in hospitals and worked with children (pediatric dentists and orthodontists).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that HAV can be considered a hazard to dental workers, with risk increasing as the number of years in dentistry increases. More studies with larger sample sizes are needed.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

As HAV infection is associated with morbidity and mortality, dentists--especially those working in areas of endemic HAV (such as Africa, Asia and Latin America)--are encouraged to consider receiving the active vaccine to prevent HAV infection.

Rapid decline of antibodies after hepatitis A immunization in liver and renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis A vaccine is safe and achieves good seroconversion rates in liver (LTX) and renal (RTX) transplant recipients.

METHODS

A study was performed to determine the anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibody decline in LTX and RTX patients, and in healthy controls who have been immunized with two doses of hepatitis A vaccine.

RESULTS

LTX and RTX patients had a satisfactory seroconversion rate after complete immunisation. However, 2 years later they had experienced a much more rapid antibody decline than controls, and only 59% of LTX and 26% of RTX seroconverters showed titres above the cut-off level defined as protective.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on immunosuppressive therapy may not be adequately protected against hepatitis A a few years after vaccination and alternative vaccination schemes may have to be considered.

Randomized controlled trial of concurrent hepatitis A and B vaccination

Hepatitis A and B viruses are threats to deployed military forces. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of concurrent vaccination against hepatitis A and B viruses. One hundred five healthy persons, 20 to 49 years of age and without serologic markers to hepatitis A or B viruses, were randomized to receive an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (HEP A; 25 units in 0.5 mL), recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (HEP B; 10 micrograms in 1.0 mL), or both (HEP A & B) concurrently in separate arms. Vaccines were administered intramuscularly at 0, 1, and 6 months. Sera obtained at 1, 2, 6, 7, and 12 months after the first dose were tested for quantitative antibody to hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) and antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen. Local reactions (e.g., pain) were reported by less than half of the volunteers and were similar at the site of HEP A, whether given alone or concurrently. However, more persons complained of pain (usually mild) at the HEP B site when HEP B was given concurrently with HEP A compared with HEP B alone (43% vs. 15%, 34% vs. 9%, and 42% vs. 15% for doses 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p < 0.05 for each dose). Among persons immunized with HEP A alone or HEP A & B, the proportion with > or = 10 mIU/mL anti-HAV was 83% in both groups 1 month after dose 1 and 100% at months 2, 7, and 12. The geometric mean concentrations of anti-HAV increased from 21 mIU/mL at month 1 to 2,649 and 2,312 mIU/mL in the HEP A and HEP A & B groups, respectively, at month 7. The response to HEP B was similar whether administered alone or concurrently. Antibody responses were similar in those receiving HEP A or HEP B concurrently or alone, but more subjects reported pain (usually mild) at the HEP B site after concurrent vaccination than after HEP B alone. Further work should be conducted to approve HEP A for patients younger than 2 years of age and to develop combined HEP A and HEP B vaccines in the United States.

Randomized, double-blind study in healthy adults to assess the boosting effect of Vaqta or Havrix after a single dose of Havrix

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted to investigate the boosting effect of Vaqta or Havrix in 537 healthy adults 18-53 years of age who had received a single dose of Havrix either 24 or 52 weeks earlier. Subjects were randomized in a 2 : 1 ratio to receive either Vaqta or Havrix for their second dose of vaccine and followed for clinical reactions for 14 days after dose 2 was administered. Serum samples were collected immediately before dose 2 was administered and again 4 weeks later and evaluated for hepatitis A antibody (modified hepatitis A virus antibody assay). The booster response rate after administration of the second dose of either vaccine was similar (86.1% for Vaqta vs. 80.1% for Havrix). The geometric mean titers were also similar: 3274 mIU/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 2776-3858) for Vaqta versus 2423 mIU/mL (95% CI, 1911-3074) for Havrix. The proportion of subjects who reported > or =1 injection-site adverse experiences was lower in the patients receiving Vaqta than in those receiving Havrix (36.6% vs. 59.7%; P<.001). The results of this study indicate that a regimen of Havrix followed by Vaqta is generally well tolerated and highly immunogenic.

Safety and immunogenicity of a pediatric formulation of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in Argentinean children

BACKGROUND

Children are a reservoir of hepatitis A virus and must be considered as primary targets of any immunization strategy. The safety and immunogenicity were evaluated for a new formulation of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, Avaxim 80 units, containing one-half the antigen dose of the adult formulation.

METHODS

The safety of two doses of this vaccine given 6 months apart was evaluated in an open study in 537 Argentinean children 12 months to 15 years old. Immunogenicity was evaluated at Weeks 0, 2, 24 and 27 in a subgroup of 120 subjects.

RESULTS

Two weeks after the first vaccine dose, >99% of initially seronegative children had seroconverted (titers > or =20 mIU/ml), with a geometric mean titer of 98.5 mIU/ml. Before booster at 24 weeks all subjects had seroconverted. A strong anamnestic response was observed after the second dose at which time the geometric mean titer had increased >35-fold, and antibody titers were consistent with long term protection. Immediate adverse reactions were observed in 3 of 537 (0.6%) subjects after the first dose. Local reactions were mild and transient and did not increase with subsequent doses. Among the systemic events reported during the 7-day follow-up period, 37 cases of fever after the first dose and 22 cases after the second dose were reported. Only 3 cases of fever were clearly related to vaccination (< or =38.2 degrees C) after the first injection, all of which subsided in less than 1 day.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the safety and immunogenicity of a pediatric formulation of hepatitis A vaccine in children ages 12 months to 15 years in healthy children ages 12 to 47 months.

Infection of hepatitis A virus in Japanese haemophiliacs

OBJECTIVES

Outbreaks of hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection in haemophiliacs have been reported from many countries. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of hepatitis A virus antibody (HAVAb) in Japanese haemophiliacs.

METHODS

Sixty-seven male haemophiliacs were recruited for this study of HAV infection. We also compared the rate of HAV infection with that of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis G virus (HGV).

RESULTS

Fifteen of 67 haemophiliacs (22.4%) were positive for HAVAb. Prevalence of HAVAb was significantly higher in haemophiliacs than in Japanese normal subjects previously reported (P= 0.0001). Age, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin and prevalence of HIV, HCV, and HGV were not statistically different between HAVAb positive and HAVAb negative haemophiliacs. We suggest that the use of clotting factor concentrates is closely associated with HAV infection, but HAV infection does not have an effect on clinical course.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of clotting factor concentrates may increase risk of HAV infection in haemophiliacs.

Inactivated hepatitis A vaccine-induced antibodies: follow-up and estimates of long-term persistence

To estimate the long-term persistence of anti-HAV antibodies, 120 (schedule 0-6) and 194 (schedule 0-12) adults were vaccinated and followed-up annually for 6 years. Shortly after the last dose, anti-HAV levels fell sharply (annual decline rate delta > 65%). Thereafter, delta diminished to 10-15%. GMTs 5.5 years after the last dose were 522 mIU/ml (0-6 group) and 749 mIU/ml (0-12 group); all subjects except one maintained detectable antibodies. The average delta over the whole follow-up period was 15-20%, resulting in an estimated persistence of anti-HAV levels > or =20 mIU/ml for 20-25 years. These estimates were similar for both applied calculation methods (GMT or individual based) and both vaccination schedules. Because the individual antibody levels tended to stabilise between the last two measurements, the hypothesis of a slow, log-linear decrease and its matching calculation methods might be subject to reconsideration. With the current methodology, however, detectable antibodies are estimated to persist for 20-25 years.