Once-weekly exenatide versus once- or twice-daily insulin detemir: randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas

OBJECTIVE

This multicenter, open-label, parallel-arm study compared the efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly (EQW) with titrated insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (with or without sulfonylureas).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to EQW (2 mg) or detemir (once or twice daily, titrated to achieve fasting plasma glucose ≤5.5 mmol/L) for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was proportion of patients achieving A1C ≤7.0% and weight loss ≥1.0 kg at end point, analyzed by means of logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included measures of glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, and safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Of 216 patients (intent-to-treat population), 111 received EQW and 105 received detemir. Overall, 44.1% (95% CI, 34.7-53.9) of EQW-treated patients compared with 11.4% (6.0-19.1) of detemir-treated patients achieved the primary outcome (P < 0.0001). Treatment with EQW resulted in significantly greater reductions than detemir in A1C (least-square mean ± SE, -1.30 ± 0.08% vs. -0.88 ± 0.08%; P < 0.0001) and weight (-2.7 ± 0.3 kg vs. +0.8 ± 0.4 kg; P < 0.0001). Gastrointestinal-related and injection site-related adverse events occurred more frequently with EQW than with detemir. There was no major hypoglycemia in either group. Five (6%) patients in the EQW group and six (7%) patients in the detemir group experienced minor hypoglycemia; only one event occurred without concomitant sulfonylureas (detemir group).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with EQW resulted in a significantly greater proportion of patients achieving target A1C and weight loss than treatment with detemir, with a low risk of hypoglycemia. These results suggest that EQW is a viable alternative to insulin detemir treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control using oral antidiabetes drugs.

Clinical experience with insulin detemir: results from the Indonesian cohort of the international A₁chieve study

AIM

To determine the safety and efficacy of insulin detemir in Indonesian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) as a sub-analysis of the 24-week, prospective, multinational, non-interventional A₁chieve study.

METHODS

This study included 477 Indonesian T2D patients starting insulin detemir at the discretion of their physicians. Safety and efficacy was measured in routine clinical practice at baseline, interim (around 12 weeks from baseline) and final (around 24 weeks from baseline) visit.

RESULTS

At baseline the mean age, duration of diabetes and mean BMI were 55.3 ± 8.5 years, 5.9 ± 4.0 years and 24 ± 3.6 kg/m(2), respectively. Of these patients, 78% were insulin-naive and 22% were prior insulin users. Glycaemic control was poor at baseline. After 24 weeks, significant reductions were observed in mean HbA1c (2.2%, p < 0.001), fasting plasma glucose (90.0 mg/dL, p < 0.001) and postprandial plasma glucose (115.4 mg/dL, p < 0.001) levels, in the entire cohort. Similar significant reductions were also seen in insulin-naive patients and prior insulin users. In the entire cohort, 32.5% patients achieved HbA1c levels <7.0% while 32.0% insulin-naive patients and 33.9% prior insulin users achieved this target after 24 weeks. No hypoglycaemic events were reported in the entire cohort. Modest increase in body weight was noted in the insulin-naive group, while mean body weight decreased in prior insulin users after 24 weeks of insulin detemir therapy.

CONCLUSION

This sub-analysis suggests that insulin detemir can be a safe and effective option for initiating insulin therapy in people with T2D in Indonesia.

Safety and effectiveness of insulin detemir in type 2 diabetes: results from the ASEAN cohort of the A₁chieve study

AIM

To determine the safety and effectiveness of insulin detemir (IDet) in type 2 diabetes patients from the ASEAN cohort of the A1chieve study.

METHODS

Patients from Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines and Singapore prescribed IDet at the discretion of their physicians were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of serious adverse drug reactions including major hypoglycaemia over 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included changes in the frequency of hypoglycaemia, serious adverse events and effectiveness assessments.

RESULTS

This sub-analysis included 1540 patients (insulin-naive, 1239; insulin-experienced, 301) with mean age ± SD 56.4 ± 10.9 years, BMI 25.4 ± 4.6 kg/m(2) and diabetes duration 6.9 ± 5.3 years. Insulin-naive patients received a baseline IDet dose of 0.24 ± 0.11 U/kg titrated up to 0.37 ± 0.21 U/kg by Week 24. The pre-study insulin dose in insulin-experienced patients was 0.41 ± 0.25 U/kg and baseline IDet dose was 0.31 ± 0.24 U/kg titrated up to 0.40 ± 0.20 U/kg by Week 24. Overall hypoglycaemia decreased from 1.73 to 0.46 events/patient-year from baseline to Week 24 (change in proportion of patients affected, p < 0.0001). At Week 24, 1 major hypoglycaemic event was reported in 1 insulin-experienced patient. IDet significantly improved glucose control (p < 0.001) at Week 24. The lipid profile and systolic blood pressure improved (p < 0.001) and body weight did not change significantly. Quality of life was positively impacted (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

IDet was well-tolerated and improved glycaemic control without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia or weight gain.

A changed pattern of insulin use following the introduction of basal analog insulin treatment in primary care

AIMS

We analyzed the impact of the removal of administrative restrictions on basal analog insulin prescribing by primary care physicians in the year 2008 in a large HMO.

METHODS

This cross-sectional database study of patients with diabetes study was conducted in Maccabi Healthcare Services, the second largest HMO in Israel, insuring 1.9 million members countrywide. The research population included men over 40 and women over the age of 45 from MHS diabetes registry during the time period 1.1.2002-31.12.2009.

RESULTS

After removal of basal analog insulin prescription restrictions, more primary care physicians initiated treatment with basal analog insulin than with other types of insulin and did so with fewer referrals for specialty diabetes consultation. No growth in the relative number of patients commencing insulin use was observed, nor did we find an earlier initiation of insulin.

CONCLUSION

In the first year following the relaxation of prescribing restrictions on the use of basal analog insulin we observed an increase in its use amongst patients previously treated with other types of insulin. The administrative changes did not result in an overall increase in the use of insulin in the study population.

Similarity of Insulin Detemir Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability Profiles in Healthy Caucasian and Japanese American Subjects

The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of insulin detemir in three ascending doses in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects. This was an open-label, single-center, parallel-group design evaluating 30 subjects (15 Japanese and 15 Caucasians). Subjects received a total of three subcutaneous injections (one injection per visit) of insulin detemir (0.19, 0.38, 0.75 U/kg [1 U = 24 nmol]) in ascending order. Following drug administration, subjects received intravenous glucose in 0.5-mg/kg/min increments every 30 minutes, followed by a constant rate of 2.0 mg/kg/min for up to 12 hours. For pharmacokinetic evaluations, serial blood sampling was performed over a period of 30 hours after dosing. Of the subjects, 36 were enrolled, and 30 completed the study. There was a linear dose-response relationship between the three ascending insulin detemir doses and serum insulin detemir AUC values for both the Japanese and Caucasian subjects. The two dose-response regression lines had equivalent slopes but slightly different intercepts (although not statistically significant). This difference may be due to variation in AUC, body weight differences, or chance. Six subjects discontinued the study, 2 as a result of adverse events (blood draw-related ecchymosis and hypoglycemia). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were headache, dizziness, and reactions related to blood draws/infusion sites. All TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. The results show that an increase in insulin detemir dose will result in a similar increase in insulin detemir concentration in the two ethnic groups. Therefore, therapeutic dosing of insulin detemir is expected to be similar in both ethnic groups, with no special dose adjustment or algorithm based on race. Insulin detemir at 0.19, 0.38, and 0.75 U/kg was generally well tolerated in both Japanese and Caucasian subjects.

A direct comparison of the pharmacodynamic properties of insulin detemir and neutral protamine lispro insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes

AIMS

To compare the pharmacodynamic properties of insulin detemir (detemir) and neutral protamine lispro (NPL) insulin using a euglycaemic glucose clamp.

METHODS

In a double-blind, crossover study, 30 patients with C-peptide negative type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned to a single dose (0.4 U/kg) of detemir and NPL. Plasma glucose (PG) was normalized with a variable insulin infusion and then decreased stepwise, followed by a euglycaemic clamp at 5.5 mmol/l over 32 h. Duration of action was defined as time from dosing until PG exceeded 8.3 mmol/l for at least 30 min.

RESULTS

Duration of action was similar for detemir [23.0 (range 2.25-32) h] and NPL [22.0 (9.5-32) h], p = 0.55. Using glucose infusion rate (GIR) parameters, detemir showed a flatter pharmacodynamic profile versus NPL: area under the curve, AUC(GIR) ((0-32))  = 1326 vs. 1841 mg/kg, p < 0.01 (detemir vs. NPL, respectively); AUC(GIR) ((0-12))  = 784 vs. 1392 mg/kg, p < 0.05; AUC(GIR) ((12-32))  = 455 vs. 274 mg/kg, p = 0.051; GIR(late) (12-32)/GIR(early) (0-12) ratio = 0.33 vs. 0.04, p < 0.001. Detemir also showed a lower and later peak of action than NPL [GIR(max) 2.0 vs. 3.2 mg/kg/min, p < 0.01; T(max) 9.1 (95% confidence interval: 3.0-14.7) vs. 7.0 h (1.8-15.2)].

CONCLUSIONS

Detemir and NPL had similar duration of action of approximately 24 h in patients with type 1 diabetes. Compared with NPL, detemir had a flatter profile with a more even distribution of metabolic effect over 24 h.

Insulin analogues in children with Type 1 diabetes: a 52-week randomized clinical trial

AIMS

This 52-week, randomized, multinational, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial investigated the efficacy and safety of basal-bolus treatment with insulin detemir vs. NPH (neutral protamine Hagedorn) insulin, in combination with insulin aspart, in subjects aged 2-16 years with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Of the 347 randomized and exposed subjects, 177 received insulin detemir and 170 NPH insulin, both administered once or twice daily in combination with mealtime insulin aspart. Glycaemic measurements and weight were followed over 52 weeks.

RESULTS

After 52 weeks, insulin detemir was shown to be non-inferior to NPH insulin with regard to HbA(1c) [mean difference insulin detemir-NPH: 1.30 mmol/mol, 95% CI -1.32 to 3.92 (0.12%, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.36) in the full analysis set and 1.41 mmol/mol, 95% CI -1.26 to 4.08 (0.13%, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.37) in the per protocol analysis set]. Hypoglycaemic events per subject-year of exposure of 24-h and nocturnal hypoglycaemia were significantly lower with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin (rate ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.97, P = 0.028 and 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-0.84, P = 0.002, respectively). Weight standard deviation (sd) scores (body weight standardized by age and gender) decreased with insulin detemir, but increased slightly with NPH insulin (change: -0.12 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001). At end of the trial, median insulin doses were similar in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin detemir was non-inferior to NPH insulin after 52 weeks' treatment of children and adolescents aged 2-16 years, and was associated with a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia, together with significantly lower weight sd score when compared with NPH insulin.

Problem based review: the patient who has taken an overdose of long-acting insulin analogue

Insulin overdose can cause harm due to hypoglycaemia, effects on electrolytes and acute hepatic injury. The established long-acting insulin analogue preparations (detemir and glargine) can present specific management problems because, in overdose, their effects are extremely prolonged, often lasting 48-96 hours. The primary treatment is continuous intravenous 10% or 20% glucose infusion with frequent capillary blood glucose monitoring. Surgical excision of the insulin injection site has been used successfully, even days after the overdose occurred. Once the effects of overdose have receded, diabetes treatment must be restarted with care, especially in patients with type 1 diabetes. Monitoring serum insulin concentration has been successfully used to predict when the effects of the overdose will cease.

[The safety and effectiveness of once daily detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes previously failing oral agents: the Chinese cohort from SOLVE(TM) observational study]

OBJECTIVE

Study of Once-daily LeVEmir(®) (SOLVE(TM)) was a 24-week international observational study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of initiating once-daily insulin detemir (Levemir) as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who failed treatment of oral anti-diabetic drugs (OAD).

METHODS

The present study was derived from the data of Chinese cohort. A total of 3272 patients with T2DM failing OAD were enrolled in the study. Determir were prescribed to the patients by the decision of the physician. Clinical data were collected at baseline, week 12 and week 24 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of detemir.

RESULTS

The age of the patients was (56.2 ± 10.8) years with a diabetes duration of (7.1 ± 5.2) years. Their BMI was (25.3 ± 3.3) kg/m(2). No patient experienced any major or nocturnal hypoglycaemic event during the study. After 24 weeks of treatment, the glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased from (8.33 ± 1.69)% to (7.16 ± 1.18)% with a mean change of -1.17%, the fasting plasma glucose decreased from (9.52 ± 2.59) mmol/L to (6.84 ± 1.42) mmol/L with a mean change of -2.7 mmol/L, and the 7-point blood glucose profile improved overall. Totally 49.1% of patients achieved HbA1c < 7%. The mean body weight decreased by 0.15 kg.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin detemir administered once daily as add-on therapy in patients with T2DM failing OAD regimen significantly reduces the risk of major hypoglycemia, improves glycemic control, increases the percentage of patients achieving treatment target with neutral effect on body weight.

Cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin in people with type 2 diabetes in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost-effectiveness of insulin detemir compared with Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin when initiating insulin treatment in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.

METHODS

Efficacy and safety data were derived from a 20-week multi-centre randomized controlled head-to-head clinical trial comparing insulin detemir and NPH insulin in insulin naïve people with T2DM, and short-term (1-year) cost effectiveness analyses were performed. As no significant differences in HbA1c were observed between the two treatment arms, the model was based on significant differences in favour of insulin detemir in frequency of hypoglycaemia (Rate-Ratio = 0.52; CI = 0.44-0.61) and weight gain (Δ = 0.9 kg). Model outcomes were measured in Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) using published utility estimates. Acquisition costs for insulin and direct healthcare costs associated with non-severe hypoglycaemic events were obtained from National Health Service public sources. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Based on lower incidence of non-severe hypoglycaemic events and less weight gain, the QALY gain from initiating treatment with insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin was 0.01 per patient per year. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the individual countries were: Denmark, Danish Kroner 170,852 (€22,933); Finland, €28,349; Norway, Norwegian Kroner 169,789 (€21,768); and Sweden, Swedish Krona 226,622 (€25,097) per QALY gained. Possible limitations of the study are that data on hypoglycaemia and relative weight benefits from a clinical trial were combined with hypoglycaemia incidence data from observational studies. These populations may have slightly different patient characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

The lower risk of non-severe hypoglycaemia and less weight gain associated with using insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin when initiating insulin treatment in insulin naïve patients with type 2 diabetes provide economic benefits in the short-term. Based on cost/QALY threshold values, this represents good value for money in the Nordic countries. Using a short-term modelling approach may be conservative, as reduced frequency of hypoglycaemia and less weight gain may also have positive long-term health-related implications.

Addition of insulin aspart with basal insulin is associated with improved glycemic control in Indian patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus: the A1chieve observational study

Insulin aspart (IAsp) has been used in patients for more than a decade. A plethora of data is available, from clinical trials, to document its efficacy and safety and suggest that IAsp is a favorable choice to be used in a basal-bolus regimen. The A1chieve@ was a non-interventional study that explored the safety and effectiveness of initiating or switching to insulin analogues in routine clinical practice in more than 60,000 patients from 28 different countries. In this manuscript, we discuss the findings from the subgroup of the Indian cohort who were treated with insulin aspart (IAsp), in addition to a basal insulin analogue (insulin detemir, IDet). In a cohort of 343, who were on IAsp + IDet, 175 (51%) were insulin naive and 168 (49%) had been on insulin therapy earlier. Glycaemic parameters were high at baseline. Mean HbA1c was 9.3% in them and was comparable in both insulin naive and insulin experienced groups. After 24 weeks of therapy with IAsp + basal insulin, there were reductions in HbA1c in both the insulin naive group, (-1.6) and insulin experienced group (-1.5). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) levels were also reduced significantly from baseline (-77 and - 110 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.001). Overall, hypoglycaemia decreased from 0.97 (baseline) to 0.18 events/patient years (24 weeks). There was also an increase in quality of life score as evaluated by EQ-5D questionnaire. Addition of IAsp with a basal insulin in patients with poor glycaemic control leads to an improvement in glycaemic profile with no major hypoglycaemia or clinically significant weight gain along with an improvement in the quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Insulin analogue therapy improves quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes in India: the A1chieve study

AIMS

To determine the effects on quality of life after starting insulin with, or switching to, insulin analogue therapies in Indians with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the 24-week, prospective, observational A1chieve study.

METHODS

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed at baseline and at 24 weeks by the validated EQ-5D questionnaire (visual analogue score [VAS] and five dimensions) in 20,554 people who had started using basal insulin detemir, mealtime insulin aspart (with or without a basal insulin) or biphasic insulin aspart 30.

RESULTS

Quality of life improved in both insulin-naive and insulin experienced patients in all treatment groups. At the start of the study, 63.2% of the insulin-naive patients reported problems with walking but after 24 weeks, only 15.2% reported difficulties. At baseline all HrQOL parameters were deteriorated in Indian cohort and the improvement observed was highly significant and well appreciated. The improvement was seen across all insulin regimen and all regions around India.

CONCLUSION

Compared with baseline scores, HRQoL improvement was seen after 24 weeks of treatment with all insulin analogue therapies

Improvement of glycemic control with addition of insulin detemir to existing antidiabetic therapy: a sub-group analysis of A1chieve observational study

BACKGROUND

The A1chieve study evaluated safety and effectiveness of insulin analogues in a large and diverse population. This report presents a subgroup analysis of the A1chieve observational study pertaining to India.

OBJECTIVE

To assess safety and effectiveness of initiation or intensification of insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) not achieving adequate glycemic control.

METHODS

The A1chieve study was a prospective, multi-center, open-label, non-interventional study of 24-weeks duration. In this post-hoc analysis, Indian patients with T2DM who did not achieve their glycemic targets, and were started with or switched to insulin detemir, were evaluated at baseline and after 24 weeks of therapy for safety and effectiveness. Adverse events (AE) noted during the course of therapy were recorded. Additionally Glycemic, non-glycemic parameters and quality of life indices were reported. Appropriate statistical analysis was carried out to assess the statistical significance.

RESULTS

The Indian cohort of 2707 patients with T2DM treated with insulin detemir included 2336 (86.29%) insulin-naive and 371 (13.71%) insulin-experienced patients. No adverse drug reaction (ADR) was noted over 24 weeks, one patient (out of 2707) reported serious adverse event. Major hypoglycemia was reported in 0.5% (0.08 events/patient year) patients and reduced to 0% (0 events/patient year) over 24 weeks. After 24 weeks' treatment with insulin detemir, an overall reduction in HbA(1c) of 2.1% was noted (p < 0.001), with a 2.1% (p < 0.001) and 2% (p < 0.001) reduction in insulin-naive and insulin-experienced groups, respectively. A significant reduction in fasting ([mean +/- SD] -3.8 +/- 2.5 mmol/L) and postprandial (-5.2 +/- 3.9 mmol/L) blood glucose (FPG and PPG) was also observed (p < 0.001 for both). At end of the study, 24.4% patients achieved the ADA target of < 7.0% and 14.3% patients achieved the AACE target of < 6.5% for HbA(1c). A significant improvement in quality of life indices like ED-5D (0.31 +/- 0.29; p < 0.001) and EQ-VAS (21.7 +/- 16.7; p < 0.001) was noticed.

CONCLUSION

In patients with T2DM not achieving their glycemic targets addition of basal insulin detemir was well tolerated and reported improvement in glycemic control.

[Once daily insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of German centers in a 6-month international observational study (SOLVE)]

BACKGROUND

Hypoglycemic risk and improved glycemic control have to be weightened when a decision on intensification of treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus with basal insulin is made. Findings from randomized studies are available in this respect, and should be complemented by data from routine treatment.

METHODS

The international, prospective, open-label, observational study SOLVE (Study of Once-Daily Levemir) investigated add-on treatment with basal insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus using once daily insulin detemir in patients currently receiving oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD). Data were collected between initiation of insulin treatment and the final visit after approximately 24 weeks. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the incidence of serious adverse drug reactions (SADR), including major hypoglycemic events.

RESULTS

In Germany, 2,090 patients were eligible for the full analysis set and 1,671 patients for the effectiveness analysis set. The mean age was 64.9 years, mean duration of diabetes 9.36 years, and mean duration of OAD treatment 7.29 years. Three patients (0.14%) experienced a SADR (1 fall resulting in death, 2 major hypoglycemic events). At the final visit, there was a significant reduction in major hypoglycemic events if compared with the period before starting insulin treatment (0.002 versus 0.120 events per patient year, p < 0.001), as were minor hypoglycemic events (0.880 versus 1.588 events per patient year, p = 0.006). The mean body weight and BMI decreased by -0.9 kg (p < 0.001) and-0.35 kg/m2 (p < 0.001) respectively and the mean HbA(1c) level improved from 8.45 +/- 1.19% to 7.30 +/- 0.92% (-1.15 +/- 1.08%; p < 0.001). The mean fasting plasma glucose level and plasma glucose variability were significantly reduced.

CONCLUSION

Baseline data of the study underline the need for earlier intensification of antidiabetic therapy in type 2 diabetes in Germany. Study results show that within the German diabetes care system, initiation of basal insulin therapy with insulin detemir is able to result in significant HbA(1c) improvements without increased risk of hypoglycemia and/or weight gain.

The safety and efficacy of adding once-daily insulin detemir to oral hypoglycaemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes in a clinical practice setting in 10 countries

AIMS

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-daily insulin detemir initiated in routine clinical practice in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs).

METHODS

This large observational study was conducted in 10 countries. Adverse event data (including hypoglycaemia) and glycaemic control were recorded before and 24 weeks following insulin initiation while patients continued routine clinical management.

RESULTS

In this study, 17 374 patients (53% male) were included. Mean pre-insulin values (±s.d.) were: age 62 ± 12 years; body mass index (BMI) 29.3 ± 5.4 kg/m(2); diabetes duration 10 ± 7 years; haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 8.9 ± 1.6%. During the study, 27 patients experienced serious adverse drug reaction, severe hypoglycaemic events or both; and there were 31 episodes of severe hypoglycaemia in 21 patients. After 24 weeks, HbA1c was 7.5 ± 1.2% (change of -1.3%; p < 0.001) and mean weight change was -0.6 kg (confidence interval -0.7, -0.5 kg, p < 0.001). Daily insulin dose increased from 13 ± 6 U (0.16 ± 0.09 U/kg) to 22 ± 16 U (0.27 ± 0.17U/kg) by 24 weeks. Multivariate regression analysis identified several independent demographic and treatment predictors of end of study HbA1c.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of once-daily insulin detemir to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on OHA therapy resulted in few adverse events, significant improvements in glycaemic control, small reductions in weight and low rates of hypoglycaemia. On the basis of this study, concerns about hypoglycaemia or weight gain should not preclude initiation of basal insulin analogues in patients with poor glycaemic control on OHAs.

Effects of insulin detemir on balloon catheter injured carotid artery in Zucker fatty rats

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effect of the long acting basal insulin analog detemir with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, and normal saline on recovery from vascular injury (balloon catheter mediated) in an animal model of insulin resistance.

METHODS

Female Zucker fatty rats were administered NPH/detemir/saline for 7 days following which, they underwent balloon catheter mediated injury of left carotid artery, and were continued on the respective regimen for an additional 21 days when they were sacrificed. We evaluated the injured carotid artery for intimal hyperplasia (Intima/Media ratio) and also, aortic arch protein for markers of oxidative stress and inflammation, in addition to expression and phosphorylation of eNOS using well established methods.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in intimal hyperplasia (Intima/Media ratio) between control and detemir treated rats (1.3±0.09, 0.82±0.08; p<0.001) whereas the IM ratio in NPH treated rats was not significantly different from saline (1.17±0.1). Expression of p-eNOS (ser-1177) in both NPH and insulin detemir (1.3±0.15, 1.11±0.12) was significantly higher than controls (0.56±0.13; p<0.05). We did not find significant differences in the expression of MnSOD, eNOS and NFκB-p65.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that in insulin resistant states, treatment with Insulin detemir but not NPH is associated with less intimal hyperplasia, although both insulins increased eNOS phosphorylation.

Insulin detemir enhances proglucagon gene expression in the intestinal L cells via stimulating β-catenin and CREB activities

Insulin therapy using insulin detemir (d-INS) has demonstrated weight-sparing effects compared with other insulin formulations. Mechanisms underlying these effects, however, remain largely unknown. Here we postulate that the intestinal tissues' selective preference allows d-INS to exert enhanced action on proglucagon (Gcg) expression and the production of glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1, an incretin hormone possessing both glycemia-lowering and weight loss effects. To test this hypothesis, we used obese type 2 diabetic db/db mice and conducted a 14-day intervention with daily injection of a therapeutic dose of d-INS or human insulin (h-INS) in these mice. The body weight of the mice after 14-day daily injection of d-INS (5 IU/kg) was decreased significantly compared with those injected with the same dose of h-INS or saline. The weight-sparing effect of d-INS was associated with significantly elevated circulating levels of total GLP-1 and reduced food intake. Histochemistry analysis demonstrated that d-INS induced rapid phosphorylation of protein kinase B (Akt) in the gut L cells of normal mice. Western blotting showed that d-INS stimulated Akt activation in a more rapid and enhanced fashion in the mouse distal ileum compared with those by h-INS. In vitro investigation in primary fetal rat intestinal cell (FRIC) cultures showed that d-INS increased Gcg mRNA expression as determined by Northern blotting and real-time RT-PCR. Consistent with these in vivo investigations, d-INS significantly increased GLP-1 secretion in FRIC cultures. Consistently, d-INS was also shown to induce rapid phosphorylation of Akt in the clonal gut cell line GLUTag. Furthermore, d-INS increased β-catenin phosphorylation, its nuclear translocation, and enhanced cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation in a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and/or mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase-sensitive manner. We suggest that the weight-sparing benefit of d-INS in mice is related to its intestinal tissues preference that leads to profound stimulation of Gcg expression and enhanced GLP-1 secretion in intestinal L cells, potentially involving the activation of insulin/β-catenin/CREB signaling pathways.

Study of Once Daily Levemir (SOLVE™): insights into the timing of insulin initiation in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice

AIMS

The aim of this analysis is to determine the timing of insulin initiation in routine clinical practice, especially in relation to glycaemic control and use of oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).

METHODS

Study of Once Daily Levemir was a 24-week international observational study involving 10 countries which evaluated the safety and effectiveness of initiating once-daily insulin detemir in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) being treated with one or more OADs (clinical trial number NCT00825643 and NCT00740519).

RESULTS

A total of 17 374 participants were enrolled in the study: aged 62 ± 12 years, 53% male, T2DM duration 10 ± 7 years, body mass index 29.3 ± 5.4 kg/m(2) . Pre-insulin HbA1c was 8.9 ± 1.6%. The proportion of patients with HbA1c ≥9.0% ranged from 64% (UK) to 23% (Poland). Pre-insulin OAD treatment included metformin (81%), sulphonylureas (59%), glinides (16%), thiazolidinediones (TZD) (12%), α-glucosidase inhibitors (12%) and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-IV inhibitors (7%). The mean starting dose of insulin detemir for the total cohort was 0.16 ± 0.09 U/kg. Differences in OAD use and insulin doses at initiation were evident among participating countries. The largest proportional changes in OAD prescribing at insulin initiation were seen with glinides (+15%), sulphonylureas (-19%), TZD (-31%) and DPP-IV inhibitors (-28%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite well-documented benefits of timely glycaemic control and consensus guidelines encouraging earlier use of insulin, considerable clinical inertia exists with respect to initiating appropriate insulin therapy in people with T2DM. Considerable regional differences exist in the timing of insulin initiation and in the use of OADs.

A crossover comparison of glycemic variations in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes receiving insulin glargine versus insulin detemir twice daily using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): J COLLECTION (Jikei COmparison of Lantus and LEvemir with Cgm for Thinking Insulin OptimizatioN)

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare glycemic variations seen among Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin glargine versus insulin detemir using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a crossover design.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with type 1 diabetes were enrolled in this study. The subjects were on either insulin glargine followed by insulin detemir twice daily, or vice versa, with no change in the timing of injections. The glycemic variations during 4-day hospitalizations were monitored by CGM while the patients were on either regimen, with a second hospitalization scheduled more than 1 month after the change of the long-acting insulin analogs. CGM data obtained on Day 3 of both hospitalizations were compared.

RESULTS

The subjects had a median age of 44.0 years, a median body mass index of 22.2 kg/m(2), and a median glycosylated hemoglobin of 7.3%. There was no significant difference between the two treatments with a mean glucose level of 156 mg/dL with the insulin glargine treatment versus 150 mg/dL with the insulin detemir treatment; their SD values were 60 versus 51 mg/dL, their mean amplitude of glycemic excursions values were 121 versus 105 mg/dL, and their mean of daily differences values were 45.7 versus 41.4 mg/dL, respectively. In addition, the insulin detemir treatment was associated with a narrower range of postprandial glucose increases after lunch (80 vs. 59 mg/dL; P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

A comparison of the long-acting insulin analogs administered twice daily in type 1 diabetes demonstrated that insulin detemir may potentially offer better glycemic control after lunch than insulin glargine.

Intensifying insulin therapy with insulin analog premixes: transitioning from basal insulin in type 2 diabetes

Because of the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes, basal insulin alone may not be able to provide sufficient glycemic control over the long term, and thus insulin regimens will typically need to be intensified--especially for controlling postprandial glucose excursions. In patients with type 2 diabetes requiring more intensive intervention, insulin analog premix formulations can offer a simple, effective, and convenient option for tighter management of hyperglycemia in lieu of a traditional basal-bolus regimen.

Molecular characterisation of long-acting insulin analogues in comparison with human insulin, IGF-1 and insulin X10

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

There is controversy with respect to molecular characteristics of insulin analogues. We report a series of experiments forming a comprehensive characterisation of the long acting insulin analogues, glargine and detemir, in comparison with human insulin, IGF-1, and the super-mitogenic insulin, X10.

METHODS

We measured binding of ligands to membrane-bound and solubilised receptors, receptor activation and mitogenicity in a number of cell types.

RESULTS

Detemir and glargine each displayed a balanced affinity for insulin receptor (IR) isoforms A and B. This was also true for X10, whereas IGF-1 had a higher affinity for IR-A than IR-B. X10 and glargine both exhibited a higher relative IGF-1R than IR binding affinity, whereas detemir displayed an IGF-1R:IR binding ratio of ≤ 1. Ligands with high relative IGF-1R affinity also had high affinity for IR/IGF-1R hybrid receptors. In general, the relative binding affinities of the analogues were reflected in their ability to phosphorylate the IR and IGF-1R. Detailed analysis revealed that X10, in contrast to the other ligands, seemed to evoke a preferential phosphorylation of juxtamembrane and kinase domain phosphorylation sites of the IR. Sustained phosphorylation was only observed from the IR after stimulation with X10, and after stimulation with IGF-1 from the IGF-1R. Both X10 and glargine showed an increased mitogenic potency compared to human insulin in cells expressing many IGF-1Rs, whereas only X10 showed increased mitogenicity in cells expressing many IRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed analysis of receptor binding, activation and in vitro mitogenicity indicated no molecular safety concern with detemir.

The role of GLP-1 mimetics and basal insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes mellitus: guidance from studies of liraglutide

In people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the incretin effect is reduced, but the recent advent of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 agonists/analogues has enabled restoration of at least some of the function of the incretin system, with accompanying improvements in glycaemic control. Two GLP-1 receptor agonists/analogues are currently approved for the treatment of T2DM-exenatide (Byetta®, Eli Lilly & Co., Indianapolis, IN, US) and liraglutide (Victoza®, Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark); a once-weekly formulation of exenatide (Bydureon®, Eli Lilly & Co.) has also been approved by the European Medicines Agency. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has recently published guidance on the use of liraglutide in T2DM, based on evidence from the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD) Phase III trial programme, which compared liraglutide with existing glucose-lowering therapies, such as exenatide and insulin glargine. The LEAD programme reported HbA1c reductions from 0.8 to 1.5% with liraglutide (1.2 and 1.8 mg), accompanied by low rates of hypoglycaemia and some weight loss; side effects were primarily gastrointestinal in nature (e.g. nausea and diarrhoea). Based on the findings of the LEAD studies and the NICE recommendation, liraglutide now represents an important therapy widely available in the UK for certain patient groups, including those with a body mass index (BMI) ≥35.0 kg/m(2) , and patients with a BMI <35 kg/m(2) who are considered unsuitable for insulin and are failing to meet targets for glycaemic control with oral agents. NICE guidelines still suggest that most patients without considerable obesity (BMI <35 kg/m(2) ) are probably best managed using insulin therapy. Evidence also suggests a future role for GLP-1 mimetics in combination with basal insulin.