Diagnostic performance of standardized ultrasound protocol for detecting perforation in pediatric appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical trials in adults and children have shown that uncomplicated acute appendicitis can be successfully treated with antibiotics alone. As treatment strategies for acute appendicitis diverge, accurate preoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis and appendiceal perforation has become increasingly important for clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

To examine diagnostic performance of ultrasound for detecting perforated appendicitis in a single institution using a standardized technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study we evaluated 113 ultrasounds from pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy between November 2014 and December 2015. All ultrasounds were performed using a standardized US protocol including still and cine images of all four abdominal quadrants, with more targeted evaluation of the right lower quadrant (RLQ) using graded compression technique. We compared US findings to intraoperative diagnosis of non-perforated or perforated acute appendicitis.

RESULTS

The standardized image protocol generated a reproducible set of ultrasound images in all cases. The most common primary appendiceal finding on US in perforated appendicitis was appendix wall thickening >3 mm (54%, 171/314) and most common secondary finding was echogenic mesenteric fat (75%, 237/314). Thinning of the appendix wall and loculated fluid collection in the right lower quadrant were both highly specific (>90%) for perforation.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of ultrasound using a standardized US technique was similar to that reported in prior studies for detecting perforated appendicitis. Despite low sensitivity, individual ultrasound findings and overall diagnostic impression of "evidence of appendix perforation" remain highly specific.

Analysis of the use of upright abdominal radiography for evaluating intestinal perforations in handlebar traumas: Three case reports

RATIONALE

Intestinal perforations due to blunt abdominal handlebar trauma are difficult to diagnose. This report presents a retrospective analysis of 3 patients with intestinal perforations due to abdominal bicycle handlebar trauma who were diagnosed via upright abdominal radiography.

PATIENTS CONCERNS

All the patients lost their balance while riding a bicycle for leisure and had fallen on the handlebar tip. The patients were initially misdiagnosed at different-level health centers despite various radiologic investigations performed.

DIAGNOSIS

The patients' intestinal perforations were diagnosed via plain upright abdominal X-ray radiography (UAXR) in our institution.

INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES

The children underwent exploratory laparotomy due to intestinal perforations. All the perforations were repaired either with primary closure or bowel resection and anastomosis with successful outcomes.

LESSONS

Pneumoperitoneum due to intestinal perforation can be diagnosed via UAXR with appropriate patient positioning and timing. This case series shows that to accurately diagnose intestinal perforations, upright plain X-ray should be routinely performed, carefully evaluated, and repeated in patients with enduring abdominal complaints.

Intestinal perforation secondary to blunt abdominal trauma in pre-existing inguinal hernia

Inguinal hernias are very common in men. We report a rare case of intestinal perforation following blunt abdominal trauma in a 80-year-old man with pre-existing inguinal hernia. A careful and serial physical examination, with the information obtained from the computed tomography (CT) scan guides the prompt surgical exploration. This case demonstrates that external forces, that may seem too trivial to cause intraperitoneal injury, can cause significant injury when applied to a patient with a hernia. It is possible to repair the intestinal perforation and inguinal hernia in the same operation.

Use of contrast-enhanced post-mortem computed tomography to diagnose intestinal perforation caused by malpractice: A case report

RATIONALE

The application of post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) and PMCT angiography (PMCTA) is becoming increasingly common in forensic investigations. One of the most frequently applied techniques today is PMCTA. However, few studies have focused on the application of contrast-enhanced PMCT of hollow organs such as the gastrointestinal tract. The intestine is a special digestive organ with a complicated anatomical structure; it is difficult to separate in medicolegal investigations, during which new rupture may occur, affecting the examiner's judgment. Moreover, the formalin-fixed intestine is more difficult to separate because of its increased brittleness. In the present case, the authors applied contrast-enhanced PMCT to the diagnosis of intestinal perforation caused by a medical accident.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 67-year-old woman with cholecystitis underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the hospital. The gallbladder was successfully removed, but the doctor was suspected to have accidentally perforated her intestinal tract with the laparoscopic machinery. The patient developed severe peritonitis and died after the operation.

DIAGNOSIS, INTERVENTIONS, AND OUTCOMES

Contrast-enhanced PMCT with isolation of the intestinal tract was performed after dissection of the body. The results suggested that the contrast agent flowed out through the rupture. The autopsy and histological examination revealed a perforated crevasse, confirming the cause of peritonitis while excluding other probabilities despite the doctor's denial.

LESSONS

Contrast-enhanced PMCT was an effective technique with which to interpret this gastrointestinal tract rupture and served as a non-invasive tool for identifying the injury.

A Case of Isolated Cecal Necrosis Preoperatively Diagnosed with Perforation of Cecum

Isolated cecal necrosis (ICN) is a rare condition which is developed under decreased mesenteric perfusion. Only a few dozen cases of ICN have been reported previously. The patient was a 59-year-old male with a previous history of atrial fibrillation. He presented to our emergency room with the chief complaint of lower abdominal pain. Computed tomography imaging revealed a dilated cecum and presence of free air. With a preoperative diagnosis of perforation of the cecum; an urgent surgery was conducted. Intraoperative findings revealed an ischemic change of the cecum and a laparoscopic-assisted ileocecal resection was performed. The pathological findings showed transmural ischemic change on the anti-mesenteric side of the cecum, and the diagnosis of ICN was achieved. Preoperative diagnosis of ICN is difficult because of its non-specific radiological features. In patients with right lower abdominal pain, ICN should be considered as a differential diagnosis especially if the patient has a comorbidity causing hypotension attack.

[CONTRIBUTION OF CONVENTIONAL CHEST/ABDOMINAL PLAIN FILMS FOR THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUS ABDOMINAL SURGERIES, WHO HAVE SUSPECTED GASTROINTESTINAL PERFORATION]

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal perforation is a well-known phenomenon among patients presented to emergency rooms. Common causes for perforation are gastric and duodenal ulcers, colon tumors and trauma. Some patients are operated on immediately due to the clear clinical picture of acute abdomen. The most accurate imaging is the abdominal CT scan. Conventional X-rays remain the first choice in the case of GI tract perforations. Our clinical observation is that in many cases X-ray studies are not sufficient for the decision-making process in patients with previous abdominal surgeries.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of X-rays on the decision-making process in patients with previous abdominal surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation was conducted of chest/abdominal X-rays, computed tomography findings and the surgeries reports of patients admitted due to GI perforation.

RESULTS

The study population of 69 patients was divided into two groups. In group 1: patients without previous abdominal surgery, X-rays of 27 patients (69.2%) were found positive for free air. In group 2: patients with previous abdominal surgeries, 16 patients demonstrated free air on chest/abdominal X-rays. The sensitivity in group 2 (53.3%) was found significantly lower compared to group 1 (69.2 %). The difference between the groups was not statistically significant; 19 of 30 (63.3%) patients with previous abdominal operations needed abdominal CT scan before final surgical decision in comparison to 38.5% of the patients without previous abdominal operations.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results we recommend not routinely performing X-rays in patients with previous abdominal surgery. Urgent computed tomography should be the first imaging modality.

DISCUSSION

In patients with previous abdominal surgeries, free air is visible only in half the patients in routine X-ray imaging. A significant number of those patients needed abdominal CT scan. Our study demonstrated that chest and abdominal plain radiography films are insufficient for the decision-making process in patients with previous abdominal operations. A multi-center prospective study is required in order to validate our findings.

A Toothpick a day, keeps the doctor away?

A Toothpick is a dreaded offender when ingested, as it is risky to cause impaction, obstruction or perforation of the gut. When ingestion of a toothpick leads to one of these complications, it clinically mimics an acute abdomen. Often the patient doesn't recall the ingestion, leading to misdiagnosis as inflammatory bowel disease, appendicitis/diverticulitis, etc. We describe the case of a 50-year old woman presenting to the emergency department with right lower abdominal pain. CT-scan showed an obstruction without clear underlying cause. The hypothesis of obstruction due to intestinal adhesions without strangulation was assumed and non-operative management lead to recovery and dismissal of the patient. However, she presented 3 weeks later with identical complaints, this time showing a terminal ileitis on CT-scan. Surprisingly, a toothpick perforating the terminal ileum was found during endoscopy and could by removed. A clinician should think of foreign body ingestion when patients present with an acute abdomen with no clear underlying pathology.

Perforation of small intestine secondary to metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: A case report

RATIONALE

About 50% of patients with a diagnosis of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma exhibit metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. The preferential sites of extrapulmonary spread are the lymph nodes, liver, brain, adrenal glands, and bones; gastrointestinal tract perforation secondary to metastatic lung cancer is extremely rare.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 60-year-old male nonsmoker patient presented with a 20-day history of facial, neck, and right upper limb edema. Physical examination revealed a 3.5 cm mass in his right chest. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a 4 cm mass near the right lung hilum.

DIAGNOSIS

Biopsy of the right chest wall mass revealed low differentiated lung adenocarcinoma. Additionally, retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy, pericardial effusion, metastases in the mediastinum, bilateral adrenal gland, and right thoracic wall nodule, as well as multiple bone metastases were also found.

INTERVENTIONS

Since the patient was diagnosed with multiple metastatic lung cancer, chemotherapy was started. One week after chemotherapy, he experienced a sudden acute abdominal pain. Abdominal CT examination indicated the possibility of intestinal perforation. Hence, the patient underwent an emergency operation. During the surgical procedure, 2 perforations of size 1×1 cm were discovered at 110 cm and 140 cm of the jejunum from Treitz's ligament. Then, an intestinal resection and end-to-end anastomosis were performed. The pathological diagnosis of the resected specimen revealed that it was a metastatic lung adenocarcinoma of small intestine.

OUTCOMES

The patient died 10 days after operation and 19 days following the cancer diagnosis due to septic shock.

LESSONS

Gastrointestinal tract metastasis from the lung is uncommon, but the survival rate is extremely low; therefore, it should be considered as a possibility in patients who present with any of the gastrointestinal symptoms.

Blunt abdominal trauma following gunshot wound Case report and literature review

Blunt abdominal trauma following gunshot wound. Case report and literature review Introduction: Similarly to blast weapons, every firearm produces explosion at the moment of shooting, which can cause injuries in every region of the body. The aim of this paper is to present the mechanism of blunt abdominal injury following gunshot wounds, bringing this uncommon disease to the clinicians' attention and to review the literature available.

CASE REPORT

A patient developed a delayed bowel perforation following a gunshot injury of the abdomen without breaking of the peritoneum. It was clinically suspected eight hours later and confirmed with contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan. The patient underwent immediate laparotomy. Resection, end-to-end anastomosis, and large lavage of the peritoneal cavity was performed. The patient was discharged ten days after operation in good condition.

CONCLUSION

Failure to recognize blunt trauma mechanism following firearm wounds increases the risk of missed injuries. Distant injuries should be suspected in all cases after blast wave and firearms exposure and a follow up should be done for many days to make sure such injuries are excluded. CT scan total body is recommended in all such cases. Key words: Blunt trauma, Distant Injuries, Firearm injuries, Pressure Waves.

Iatrogenic Bowel Injury at Exchange of Supra-Pubic Catheter

Suprapubic catheter insertion and exchange is a common urological procedure, but it is not without risks and complications. While bowel perforation is a recognised complication at suprapubic catheter insertion, it is not commonly reported at suprapubic catheter exchange. We report our experience of recognition, diagnosis and subsequent successful management of the most important complication related to suprapubic catheters.

Sonographic and CT imaging features of intestinal perforation from a pill and packing: A case report

RATIONALE

Sharp foreign bodies such as toothpicks or chicken bones can lead to intestinal perforation. Small intestinal perforation secondary to foreign body ingestion is usually manifested as an acute abdomen without a history of trauma. Here we describe the diagnosis and treatment of a case of small bowel perforation caused by an ingested pill and its outer packing.

PATIENT CONCERNS

An 84 years old male patient complained of right lower abdominal pain for 4 days and the pain was becoming progressively worse.

DIAGNOSES

The patient, who has Alzheimer's disease, mistakenly took the pill (oxiracetam) without removing the outer packaging. This resulted in perforation of the small intestine.

INTERVENTIONS

During the ultrasound examination, the scanning physician discovered that the abnormal sonographic findings present could not be explained by the leading diagnosis of perforation of the small intestine at the time. This led the physician to suspect small bowel perforation secondary to a foreign body. The subsequent computerized tomography (CT) examination further confirmed the ultrasound findings.

OUTCOMES

Emergency laparotomy was performed and the foreign body was removed. After the surgical procedure, the patient resumed anti-inflammatory treatment (Cefoxitin sodium 2000mg tid) and rehydration therapy (Sodium Chloride Solution 100mL tid).

LESSONS

Because ingestion of foreign bodies of this type is relatively rare, when patients cannot provide an accurate history, diagnosis can be quite difficult. In this paper, the imaging features associated with intestinal perforation secondary to foreign body ingestion on ultrasound and CT are described. This series of events demonstrate how imaging findings can guide and alter a clinician's decision-making.

The spectrum and outcome of blunt trauma related enteric hollow visceral injury

Introduction This audit focused on patients who sustained enteric injury following blunt abdominal trauma. Methods Our prospectively maintained electronic registry was interrogated retrospectively, and all patients who had sustained blunt abdominal trauma between December 2011 and January 2016 were identified. Results Overall, 2,045 patients had sustained blunt abdominal trauma during the period under review. Seventy per cent were male. The median age was 28 years. Sixty patients (2.9%) sustained a small bowel injury (SBI). Thirty-five of these were peritonitic on presentation. All patients with a SBI had a chest x-ray and free air was present in seven. In 18 patients with a SBI, computed tomography (CT) was performed, which revealed isolated free fluid in 12 and free intraperitoneal air in 5. In five cases, the CT was normal. A total of 32 patients (1.5%) sustained blunt duodenal trauma (BDT). All patients with BDT had a chest x-ray on presentation. Free intraperitoneal air was not present in any. CT was performed on 17 patients with BDT. This revealed isolated free fluid or retroperitoneal air in 12. The median delay between injury and presentation for these enteric injures was 15.5 hours (interquartile range [IQR]: 8-25 hours) while between presentation at hospital and operation, the median delay was 6 hours (IQR: 3-13 hours). Conclusions Blunt trauma related enteric hollow visceral injury remains associated with delayed diagnosis and significant morbidity. It can be caused by a disparate array of mechanisms and is difficult to diagnose even with modern imaging strategies.

Ingested bread clip as an unexpected diagnostic tool

We describe a case where a bread clip has in fact became lodged adjacent to a portion of small bowel affected by a deposit of previously undiagnosed metastatic serous carcinoma of likely ovarian origin.

Successful diagnosis and treatment of ingested wooden toothpicks: Two case reports

RATIONALE

Foreign-body ingestion is a common phenomenon and foreign bodies are mostly excreted in stool. Once sharp bodies are ingested without being realized, perforation of intestine is possible and misdiagnosis may be made. We report 2 toothpick ingestion cases that were both diagnosed accurately.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We present 2 cases of middle-aged persons who suffered from abdominal pain. They did not realize and provide any information of having the history of swallowing foreign bodies.

DIAGNOSES

No serious problem was discovered in the examination and blood test. There were somewhere abnormal in computed tomography (CT) images and ultrasound (US). Then a toothpick was found penetrating the wall of intestine into the adjacent viscera in the laparotomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Both patients in the 2 cases were undergone operation to remove the toothpicks.

OUTCOMES

The 2 cases' prognoses were good.

LESSONS

When accepting patients with abdominal pain, suitable examining means and careful observation should be given to find easily ignored lesions. CT is recommended in the diagnostic process of swallowed foreign mass. When there is a vague place, US can be used for further diagnose.

Intestinal perforation due to typhoid fever in Karamoja (Uganda)

INTRODUCTION

This is a retrospective analysis of patients operated for typhoid perforation, aiming to analyze epidemiology, clinical-diagnostic and therapeutic aspects, mortality and prognosis.

METHODS

47 patients were operated at Matany Hospital from 2010 to 2016. We examined clinical files to collect data. Microbiological and isthological examinations were unavailable, so etiology was deducted operatively.

RESULTS

Median age: 17.85 years, 61.7% of patients were male, 74.47% perforated within two weeks from the onset of symptoms. Every radiological investigation (X-Rays and Ultrasound Scans) resulted positive. 40 patients underwent primary repair, 4 underwent resection. 72.34% experienced postoperative complications, SSI (Surgical Site Infection) occurred in 40.42%. Mortality rate reached 5.56% in patients without organ failure (vs 31.03%) and 11.76% (vs 20.51%) in patients operated within 24 hours from perforation. An MPI (Mannheim Peritonitis Index) score >30 was related with a mortality rate of 36% (vs 3.45%).

CONCLUSIONS

Peak of incidence occurs at the end of rainy season. Majority of patients are young men. Main symptoms are fever and signs of intestinal obstruction, with a shorter period before perforation. Primary repair is the technique of choice for single perforations, resection for multiple ones, right colectomy in case of cecal involvement, ileostomy for important peritoneal contamination. SSI are the most frequent complications, enteric fistulas the most severe ones. Mortality rate is around 21.28%. Important prognostic factors are time between perforation and operation and the presence of organ failure. An MPI score >30 is related with a poorer prognosis.

KEY WORDS

Prognostic factors, Surgical treatment, Typhoid perforation, Uganda.

Antimesenteric gastrointestinal tract duplication undergoing non-ulcerative perforation

Duplications of the gastrointestinal tract are rare malformations, most commonly presenting as cystic structures growing within the smooth muscle wall. Very rarely, they are completely detached from the tract. Several theories have been proposed regarding their embryological development, but no single one has been able to account for all of the described variants. The most common type of duplication is related to the small bowel and develops at its mesenteric border, assuming a spherical or tubular shape. Their clinical manifestations vary, depending mainly on their localization and size. Most commonly, they cause subacute abdominal pain and intestinal obstruction in children of less than two years of age. We present a case of an 8.5-year-old girl, investigated for right lower quadrant abdominal pain. On ultrasound scan, a cystic mass indicative of a duplication cyst was discovered and she underwent a laparotomy. A tense cystic spherical mass 2.2 cm in diameter was excised from the terminal ileum, 4 cm from the ileocecal valve. The cyst had the characteristics of a gastrointestinal tract duplication, except from the fact that it was located on the antimesenteric border of the intestine. On the other hand, the lesion did not present the characteristic features of a Meckel's diverticulum. According to our knowledge, this is the first report of an intestinal duplication cyst appearing on the antimesenteric intestinal border.