Anaphylaxis during surgical and interventional procedures

OBJECTIVE

To describe the current evidence-based knowledge of the causes, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of patients with anaphylaxis associated with surgical and interventional procedures.

DATA SOURCES

Articles published between 1966 and 2003 were identified in MEDLINE using the keywords anaphylactoid, anaphylaxis, anesthetics, antibiotics, cephalosporins, contrast media, colloids, flow cytometry, hypersensitivity, latex, neuromuscular depolarizing agents, neuromuscular nondepolarizing agents, penicillins, radioallergosorbent test, skin test, and vancomycin. Additional studies were identified from article reference lists.

STUDY SELECTION

Relevant, peer-reviewed original research articles and reviews.

RESULTS

Neuromuscular blocking agents, natural rubber latex, antibiotics, and induction agents are the most common causes of anaphylaxis during surgical and interventional procedures. Colloids, opioids, and radiocontrast media probably account for less than 10% of all reactions. Newer agents implicated in anaphylaxis include isosulphan blue and chlorhexidine. Skin tests are useful for evaluating allergic reactions to anesthetic agents and penicillins and for selecting alternative agents. Skin testing and specific IgE measurements for latex vary in allergen standardization and sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Flow cytometric allergen stimulation tests show promise in differentiating allergic from idiosyncratic ("pseudoallergic") reactions. Drug desensitization has been shown to be useful for penicillin anaphylaxis. Premedication with histamine receptor antagonists and corticosteroids helps prevent or attenuate radiocontrast media reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Anaphylaxis during surgical and interventional procedures may be difficult to evaluate because of the rapid, successive use of multiple drugs or diagnostic agents. Careful analysis of anesthetic records and diagnostic tests for all the putative agents are necessary to ensure a complete evaluation.

Sensitization to Ficus benjamina: relationship to natural rubber latex allergy and identification of foods implicated in the Ficus-fruit syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ornamental Ficus benjamina (FB) has been recognized as a new indoor allergen. Little is known about the prevalence in moderately exposed subjects and the proposed association with fruit and Hevea latex hypersensitivity.

OBJECTIVE

To study the prevalence of FB sensitization and the relationship with Hevea latex allergy, to identify cross-reacting fruits, and to characterize the responsible allergens.

METHODS

A skin prick test solution prepared from FB latex (200 microg/mL) was included in our routine screening programme for suspect inhalant allergy. Patients reacting with the FB extract were further skin tested with exotic fruits by the prick-to-prick method. Inhibition of fig and FB CAP by FB latex, fig (Ficus carica), kiwi, the thiolproteases ficin and papain, Hevea latex and rHev b 6.02 (hevein) was performed in selected patients.

RESULTS

Of 2662 patients with a positive skin test to any aeroallergen, 66 (2.5%) reacted with FB. Ten patients showed isolated sensitization to FB. Although FB-positive subjects were more often co-sensitized to Hevea latex than FB-negative (10.6% vs 3.8%, P< 0.01), nearly 90% tested negative for Hevea latex. Sensitization to FB was specifically associated with positive skin tests to fresh fig (83%), dried fig (37%), kiwi fruit (28%), papaya (22%), avocado (19%), banana (15%), and pineapple (10%) (n = 54). Clinical reactions were reported mainly from fresh and dried fig and kiwi (47%, 60%, and 64%, respectively, of skin test-positive patients), including seven patients with systemic reactions (urticaria, angiooedema, asthma). CAP to fig in 11 patients with clinical fruit allergy was inhibited on average by 87% by FB latex, 89% by fresh fig, 80% by dried fig, 38% by kiwi (100 microg/mL each), and by 59% and 44% by ficin and papain (50 microg/mL), respectively. No inhibition was obtained with Hevea latex and rHev b 6.02. CAP to FB was inhibited on average by 95% by FB, 60% by fresh fig, 41% by ficin, 29% by papain, and less than 7% by rubber latex allergens.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitization to FB latex is found in 2.5% of atopic individuals and mostly occurs independently of Hevea latex allergy. Sensitization is commonly associated with allergic reactions to figs and other tropical fruits ('Ficus-fruit syndrome'). This cross-reactivity is mediated at least in part by thiolproteases.

Decreasing incidence of occupational contact urticaria caused by natural rubber latex allergy in German health care workers

BACKGROUND

The development of allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) is a risk for health care workers. A regulation banning powdered NRL gloves was implemented in Germany in 1998.

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses the effects of this regulation on the development of occupational skin disease caused by NRL in health care personnel working in facilities insured by the German statutory accident insurance company, covering some 1.8 million insured health care workers.

METHODS

We reviewed the annual numbers of reported suspected cases of NRL-induced occupational allergies (mainly contact urticaria) from 1996 through 2002, as well as the number and type of gloves purchased in acute-care hospitals from 1986 through 2002.

RESULTS

The number of purchased nonsterile examination gloves increased by 1387% between 1986 and 2002. The purchase of powder-free NRL examination gloves exceeded that of powdered gloves in 1998. The incidence of suspected cases increased until 1998 and has since decreased by 79.9%. Most suspected cases (67.9%) were identified as occupationally caused.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing the purchase of powdered NRL gloves is associated with a decrease in suspected and proved cases of occupational contact urticaria caused by NRL. Development of occupationally caused contact urticaria by NRL can be reduced by banning the use of powdered NRL gloves.

[Contact urticaria to natural rubber latex in childhood and associated atopic symptoms: a study of 27 patients aged under 15 years]

BACKGROUND

Although natural rubber latex hypersensitivity is considered as a major problem in adult, it may be still misdiagnosed in childhood.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We collected 27 observations of natural rubber latex contact urticaria in children under 15 Years of age, 21 of them aged under 8.

RESULTS

All of them where atopic and 19 out of 27 presented with other association paroxystic signs of immediate hypersensitivity, that were lately related to latex allergy (i. e. asthma, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, fainting). Cross-allergy to food allergens was present in 33 p. 100. Average level of specific IgE to natural rubber latex was 21.7 kU/l. One to 4 Years follow up confirmed the benefit of latex eviction on urticaria as well as on associated symptoms. It led to the early detection of ficus allergy in 4 of them.

DISCUSSION

This series confirms that atopy is at high risk for natural rubber latex allergy in children. These data suggest that atopic children are exposed too early to latex devices such as pacifiers, toodles of latex toys. Contact urticaria in children must be considered as a possible marker of other respiratory or general symptoms that may have been misconsidered under other etiologies.

Latex allergy in children with urological malformation and chronic renal failure

PURPOSE

Children with spina bifida, bladder exstrophy and anorectal anomalies are at risk for latex allergy. Severe intraoperative anaphylaxis in a boy treated with kidney transplantation prompted this study to evaluate the prevalence of latex allergy in a cohort of children with chronic renal failure (CRF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1996 and 2002, 57 boys and 28 girls were investigated at a median age of 10.5 years (range 1.3 to 22.9). Urological malformations were the underlying cause of CRF in 33 patients (39%). Of the patients 39 were on conservative treatment, 20 were on dialysis and 26 had a functioning renal graft. Latex reaction was assessed by a careful history, specific serum latex IgE and skin prick test.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients (22%) showed latex reaction, of whom 8 had allergy (clinical symptoms included severe intraoperative anaphylaxis in 1) and 11 had sensitivity (positive IgE or prick test without symptoms). Of these 19 patients 11 had urological malformations. The number of surgical procedures, young age at operation and atopy were significant risk factors. When operations were analyzed separately, ie urological vs nonurological surgery, only urological surgery was significantly associated with latex reaction. A significant correlation was also found between the overall number of operations and latex radioallergosorbent class.

CONCLUSIONS

All children with CRF who undergo early and multiple urological surgery are at high risk for latex reaction. Primary latex prevention, ie the routine use of latex-free gloves, tubes and catheters, should be implemented in all children with complex urological malformations.

Prolonged Cardiovascular Collapse Due to Unrecognized Latex Anaphylaxis

We present a case of a prolonged anaphylactic reaction that occurred in temporal relationship to the administration of cefazolin. Subsequent allergy testing was positive for latex and negative for cefazolin-both unexpected results. Our case illustrates that medications administered before the onset of anaphylaxis should not be assumed to be the causative allergen and that a latex allergy should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Because the etiology of an anaphylactic reaction cannot be immediately determined, patients experiencing intraoperative cardiovascular collapse should be treated in a latex-free environment.

IMPLICATIONS

We describe a patient who experienced latex-induced intraoperative anaphylaxis. The event coincided with antibiotic administration, which prompted us to erroneously assume that the causative allergen was medication related. Allergy to latex must always be considered as a potential culprit of perioperative cardiovascular collapse.

Latex allergy and occupational asthma in health care workers: adverse outcomes

The prevalence of natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy has been estimated to be 5-18% in health care workers, and latex exposure has been one of the leading causes of occupational asthma in the last several years. We present the cases of two nurses who developed sensitivity to NRL, both with dermatologic symptoms and respiratory symptoms that included asthma. They were referred to the University of Maryland for evaluation of their allergies, then for occupational and environmental consults. The patients' allergy to NRL was confirmed on the basis of clinical history, a positive skin test to latex, and the presence of latex-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) serology by radioallergosorbent test (RAST). Both patients worked in the same community hospital for approximately 20 years; one was an endoscopy nurse and the other worked in the emergency department. Following the diagnosis of allergy to latex, both patients avoided direct skin contact with latex, but they continued to work in the same respective environments, where powdered latex gloves and other potentially sensitizing chemicals were used. Instead of improving, the clinical condition of the patients worsened and they remained symptomatic, even after they were removed from their workplace. Their airways reacted to low levels of a variety of sensitizers and irritants in the environment, and they became depressed. Both nurses were referred for vocational rehabilitation.

Allergenic components of Indian jujube (Zizyphus mauritiana) show IgE cross-reactivity with latex allergen

BACKGROUND

'Latex-fruit syndrome' has been well documented. A prevalence of latex allergy among medical workers of 6.8-8.6% had been reported in Taiwan. However, there has been no study to determine the importance and type of fruit hypersensitivity in latex-allergic patients in Taiwan. This study aimed to identify the allergenic components of Indian jujube (Zizyphus mauritiana) and characterize the cross-reactivity of specific IgE antibodies to latex allergen.

METHODS

Crude extracts were prepared from Indian jujube and from ammoniated natural rubber latex, and six medical workers and one patient with a history of fruit allergy underwent skin testing with routine allergens, latex, Indian jujube and other fruits. Sera from two Indian jujube skin test-positive latex-allergic subjects were used for allergen-specific IgE, immunoblotting, immunoblot inhibition and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) inhibition studies.

RESULTS

Both patients had positive skin test responses and specific IgE assays to Indian jujube and latex extracts. Immunoblotting revealed that IgE from both subjects bound to a 42-kD latex protein and a 42-kD Indian jujube protein. In addition, IgE from one subject bound to a 30-kD Indian jujube protein. Preincubation of atopic sera with Indian jujube or latex extract demonstrated absent and/or marked inhibition of IgE binding. Moreover, anti-Indian jujube protein antibody-based ELISA was able to detect latex extracts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results add to findings regarding the 'latex-fruit syndrome' described in the literature, and further study of the cross-reacting allergens identified in Indian jujube may help to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this syndrome.

Cross-reactivity between obeche wood (Triplochiton scleroxylon) and natural rubber latex

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that allergy to natural rubber latex is associated with cross reactivity to other plants. We have investigated a possible cross reactivity with a tree belonging to the Sterculiaceae family, Tryplochiton scleroxylon, in a patient allergic to obeche wood, that began to suffer symptoms of allergy in contact with latex.

METHODS

Determinations of specific IgE by CAP to obeche, natural rubber latex (NRL) and recombinant allergens of latex were done. Immunoblotting was performed to study allergens detected by serum of our patient. CAP-inhibition methods were used to study cross-reactive between NRL and obeche wood.

RESULTS

In obeche extract, 4 bands were found of an apparent molecular weight of 18, 38, 75 and 199 kDa. In NRL extract the allergens have a molecular weight around 18, 21, 32, 38, 60, 70 and 199 kDa. IgE to latex was almost completely inhibited (96%) by the obeche extract in CAP-inhibition studies. Using obeche extract as inhibitor, IgE binding to native hevein (nHevb 6.02) was reduced by 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained in CAP-inhibition demonstrate the existence of cross-reactivity between proteins in NRL and obeche wood. In our patient, a band of apparent molecular weight of 38 kDa could be the most important allergen.

[Follow-up of latex-induced occupational asthma]

We studied 29 subjects with latex-induced occupational asthma in a follow-up of 5 +/- 3 years. Initial and follow-up visits included a questionnaire and measurement of lung volumes, bronchial responsiveness to methacholine (PD20FEV1), and latex-specific serum IgE levels. At follow-up, 17 subjects were no longer exposed to latex, whereas 12 subjects had reduced exposure. Asthma and rhinitis symptoms, use of steroids and bronchial hyperresponsiveness improved significantly at follow-up, whereas mean FEV1% and FVC% decreased (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that the main determinant of FEV1 and PD20FEV1 at follow up were the values of these variables at diagnosis. Complete recovery of occupational asthma was observed in 7 subjects (24%), all in the non-exposed group. Latex-specific IgE did not exhibit significant changes. In conclusion latex-induced occupational asthma improves after a follow-up of 5 +/- 3 years, but a complete recovery occurs in a minority of subjects and is associated with cessation of exposure. Lung function measurements at follow up depend from their impairment at the time of diagnosis.

[Follow-up of symptoms, parameters of respiratory function, and data on specific sensitization in a group of subjects with latex-induced asthma and rhinitis]

We re-investigated 13 workers 6 years (SD 2) after the first diagnosis of asthma or rhinitis caused by latex, to update the exposure to latex, the eventual symptoms, respiratory function (spirometry and metacholine PD20 FEV1), skin prick test to common allergens and latex, RAST to latex, total IgE levels and eosinophils count in the blood. At the follow up, all the workers stopped wearing powdered latex gloves, but for 10 an indirect exposure to latex was still possible. All cases referred improvement of respiratory symptoms at work, but 7 workers occasionally complained of mild symptoms. No statistically significant variations of respiratory function test and of the immunological parameters were found. The workers with persistent respiratory symptoms at work had a longer duration of symptoms before the diagnosis (p = 0.02), if compared with workers without symptoms.

Latex allergy and fruit cross-reaction in subjects who are nonatopic

Since the first case reported in 1927, latex allergy has attracted the attention of allergists including its capacity to cross-react with fruits. To evaluate the frequency of sensitivity to some fruit allergens shown to cross-react with latex, we evaluated 82 patients (43 men and 39 women, aged between 18 and 45 years) with latex allergy. All patients underwent skin tests with various fruit extracts that potentially cross-react with latex. Only patients with negative prick tests successively underwent prick-by-prick tests with fresh fruits. Thirty-nine of 82 patients (47.5%) were found to have positive skin tests. Prick tests with fruit extracts were positive in 28 patients (kiwi, 21 patients; banana, 17 patients; avocado, 8 patients; and papaya, 3 patients), and the prick-by-prick test had positive results in 11 patients (kiwi, 7 patients; banana, 4 patients; and avocado, 3 patients). In our experience patients with latex allergy are at a high risk of sensitization to some fruits and they often develop allergic reactions, even severe ones, after eating them; for this reason fruit sensitization should be taken into consideration when investigating patients allergic to natural rubber latex.

Quantified environmental challenge with absorbable dusting powder aerosol from natural rubber latex gloves

BACKGROUND

There are few data that link quantified natural rubber latex (NRL) absorbable dusting powder aerosol to biologic responses in NRL-sensitized subjects.

METHODS

We conducted a study on 30 health care workers with possible occupational asthma. All the subjects but 2 had a positive skin prick test result with NRL extract. Quantified environmental challenge (QEC) with powdered NRL gloves was performed in a 7-m(3) chamber. The patients would don and discard a pair of gloves every 3 minutes up to a maximum of 60 minutes. The concentrations of NRL aeroallergen were measured by a competitive IgE immunoassay. Ocular and respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function were monitored.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (87%) had rhinoconjunctivitis, 19 (63%) had an asthmatic response (responders), and 1 patient developed eosinophilic bronchitis on QEC. The asthmatic responses were of the early type in 15 patients, dual in 3, and isolated late in 1 patient. The duration of exposures sufficient to elicit asthmatic responses varied from 3 to 114 cumulative minutes. Time-weighted average NRL aeroallergen concentrations during QEC with responders ranged between 199 and 1107 ng/m(3). NRL concentrations measured at various time points during exposure were reproducible. Measured concentrations of NRL aeroallergen between responders (677 +/- 281 ng/m(3)) and nonresponders (611 +/- 351 ng/m(3)) were not statistically different. The cumulative inhaled NRL aeroallergen dose required for an asthmatic response ranged between 25 to 515 ng.

CONCLUSION

The total dose of latex aeroallergen eliciting an asthmatic response during QEC was mostly affected by the duration of exposure and varied widely from person to person.

Cataract surgery for natural rubber latex allergic patients

The prevalence of reactions against natural rubber latex (NRL) is thought to be increasing in both the general public and healthcare workers. These can vary from mild benign skin reactions to bronchospasm, anaphylactic shock, and death. Difficulties exist for ophthalmic departments wishing to establish protocols in providing 'latex-free environments' for patients undergoing cataract surgery. Currently no legislation exists regarding the labelling of NRL-containing products in the United Kingdom with information on a product's NRL content provided by the manufacturer on a voluntary basis only. It is hoped this review article will act as a basic guide in the management of NRL-sensitive patients undergoing cataract surgery in the United Kingdom.

The Latex Allergic Psychiatric Patient

Latex allergy is an immune system illness affecting an increasing number of individuals. People with latex allergy often experience anxiety and fear about real and potential exposure to products containing natural rubber latex. Nurses working in acute care and general medical-surgical areas are more likely to be aware of this emerging illness than nurses working on a psychiatric unit. The nature of latex allergy and the immune system response are described in this article. People with latex allergy may react when they are exposed to latex allergens or specific foods. This article identifies nursing interventions and describes those appropriate for people with anxiety or fear responses. Patients with latex allergy can be managed when nursing staff understand both the medical and psychiatric aspects of care.

[Latex. An important aeroallergen involved in occupational asthma]

Latex has become one of the most frequent aetiological agents of occupational asthma in the last decade, especially amongst health personnel. The prevalence of occupational asthma due to latex in the different affected occupations varies between 2.5 and 10%, figures that give an idea of the magnitude of the problem. Latex proteins, absorbed in the dust of cornstarch, used as a lubricant, are responsible for asthma due to latex gloves. This cornstarch dust that covers the inside of the gloves acts as a vehicle for dispersing allergenic proteins. Latex aeroallergens are found in particles of different dimensions. The levels of latex aeroallergens in the environment capable of causing sensitization and of unleashing symptoms are not well defined. The determination of these levels of exposure to latex is complicated, since with latex one is dealing with a complex mixture of allergens with differing stability and bio-availability. The bioaerosol of latex is mainly produced by the active use of powdered gloves, but rugs or carpets and coverings act as important reservoirs of the allergen. Besides, the movement of people from areas with a high environmental concentration of latex constitutes an important means of dispersing the allergen, and probably ventilation systems as well. As in other cases of occupational asthma, diagnosis in many cases requires that a bronchial challenge be realized. The specific challenge tests through inhalation with latex have been carried out by different methods, which can be grouped by those that use an aqueous extract of latex and those that consist in handling or shaking gloves, which thus generate a dust aerosol. Each method has its advantages and drawbacks as described. Once the sensitized patient begins manifestations of the disease, his prognosis is poor if measures aimed at a maximum reduction of exposure to latex are not applied.

Occupational asthma from natural rubber latex. Specific inhalation challenge test and evolution

BACKGROUND

Natural rubber latex (NRL) is the most frequent cause of occupational respiratory problems in hospital workers.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the diagnostic methodology, including the specific inhalation challenge (SIC), used on patients diagnosed as having occupational asthma due to NRL in our Allergy Department during a 6-year period from 1989 to 1995.

METHODS

In 19 patients diagnosed as having occupational asthma due to NRL, clinical severity was assessed with a combined score for symptoms and medication use. Skin prick tests with aeroallergens, latex, papain, kiwi and chestnut, total IgE, serum-specific latex IgE, respiratory function study, methacholine test, specific conjunctival test, and SIC test with latex were done.

RESULTS

All but three patients worked in hospitals. All presented urticaria and rhinoconjunctivitis, and six also suffered anaphylaxis, usually preceded by asthma. Clinical fruit allergy was present in eight patients. The latency period was variable (0.25-27 years). The intensity of symptoms was low to moderate. Specific IgE, skin prick, and conjunctival tests to latex were positive in all cases. SICs were done in 12 patients. All of them presented isolated immediate reactions. No adverse reactions were observed. Duration of follow-up ranged from 1 to 7 years. Twenty-six percent of the patients kept their job, 26% changed jobs but remained in health care, and 48% switched to jobs unrelated to health care. Only 16% were free of symptoms without treatment, while 32% needed bronchodilators and 52% needed inhaled steroids. The specific bronchial challenge test was safe, but it did not predict the course of the illness. Duration of exposure and intensity of symptoms did correlate with prognosis, however.

CONCLUSIONS

NRL acts as a common aerollergen. Minor symptoms often precede occupational asthma. The SIC test was safe in the hands of trained technicians. Occupational asthma due to NRL seems to have a poor prognosis.