Drug fever due to piperacillin/tazobactam loaded into bone cement

Although drug fever may develop after administration of the drug by various routes, it has not been reported with antibiotic-loaded bone cement. Here, a case of drug fever induced by piperacillin/tazobactam loaded into bone cement is reported. A 72-yr-old woman presented with fever that developed two weeks after insertion of bone cement loaded with antibiotics including piperacillin/tazobactam into the knee joint for infectious arthritis. The fever was associated with a skin rash and blood eosinophilia. The work-up of the fever excluded several causes. Drug provocation test demonstrated that the piperacillin/tazobactam, which had been loaded in the bone cement, was the cause of the fever. The findings of this case suggest that drug fever can be induced by any drug placed and released continuously within the body. Therefore, the evaluation for possible drug fever should include all drugs the patient has been exposed to regardless of the route of administration.

Low-dose beta-lactam plus amikacin in febrile neutropenia: cefepime vs. piperacillin/tazobactam, a randomized trial

Patients with fever and granulocytopenia are at risk of developing severe infection. We performed a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose cefepime plus amikacin (C-A) compared to low-dose piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin (PT-A). Patients received cefepime (2 g/12 h) plus amikacin (15 mg/kg/day) or piperacillin/tazobactam (4 g/500 mg/8 h) plus amikacin. A total of 317 episodes of febrile granulocytopenia in 190 patients were studied (152 in the C-A group, 165 in the PT-A group). A microbiologically documented infection was present in 53 (35%) episodes in the C-A group and 41 (25%) episodes in the PT-A group (p = ns); a clinically documented infection was observed in 39 (26%) and 47 (28%) episodes, respectively. Toxicity was observed in 6 (4%) episodes in the C-A group and in 5 (3%) episodes in the PT-A group. The antibiotic success rate (no change or addition of antibiotics) was recorded in 89 (59%) and 105 (64%) cases, respectively (p = ns). Mortality related to infection was similar in each arm (3.9% vs. 3.6%). Combination therapy of low-dose beta-lactam with an aminoglycoside achieves very good response rates and low rates of toxicity. It might be an attractive option in an environment of increasing resistance among gram-negative bacteria.

Use of the lymphocyte transformation test in the diagnosis of DRESS syndrome induced by ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam: two case reports

Drug-related rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome, or drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS), is a life-threatening multiorgan systemic reaction characterized by rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, hepatitis, and leukocytosis with eosinophilia. Aromatic anticonvulsant drugs and allopurinol have been reported to be the most frequent eliciting agents. Our search of the literature revealed only 2 cases induced by piperacillin and 1 case by ceftriaxone.We present 2 cases of DRESS syndrome induced by the beta-lactam drugs ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam. An allergological workup including skin prick test, intradermal tests, patch tests, and lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was performed. LTT was shown to be a useful technique in both cases to help to identify the drugs involved.

Haemolytic anaemia caused by piperacillin-tazobactam

We report a case of haemolytic due to the use of piperacillin-tazobactam in a 50-year-old woman. Since 2002 4 other cases were reported. Either the presence of piperacillin as tazobactam can induce haemolysis. In all cases discontinuating the drugs resolves the haemolysis. Although drug-induced haemolytic anaemia due to piperacillin-tazobactam is rare, the common use of this antibioticum in the critical care setting should alert the physician as a possible culprit in cases of haemolytic anaemia.

[Clinical effects and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam in treating neutropenic febrile patients with malignant hematopathy]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam on neutropenic febrile patients with Malignant Hematopathy.

METHODS

218 patients with malignant hematopathy complicated by infectious fever, 162 (74.31%) with fever of unknown origin (FUO), 33 (15.14%) with clinically defined infection (CDI), and 23 (10.55%) with microbiologically defined infection (MDI), underwent intravenous drip of piperacillin/tazobactam at the dose of 4.5 g for 30 min every 8 hours till 4 - 5 d after the temperature returned to normal or neutropenia was relieved. Twenty hours before and after treatment blood routine, blood biochemical and electrolytes, and bacteriological examination, chest X-ray examination were conducted. The changes of symptoms and signs were observed.

RESULTS

The total effective rate was 65.60%, the bacteria clearance rate was 71.43%, and the adverse reaction rate was 5.04%. The average defervescence time was (2.5 +/- 1.2) days, and the duration of antibiotic therapy was (9.4 +/- 8.1) days. There were not significant differences in the curative effect and defervescence time between the patients undergoing chemotherapy and those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (chi2 = 2.058, P > 0.05, and t = 1.892, P > 0.05). After the piperacillin/tazobactam treatment the white blood cell count and absolute neutrophile granulocyte count of the patients significantly increased (t = 4.092, P < 0.01; t = 4.248, P < 0.01). However, the hepatic and renal functions did not change obviously after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Piperacillin/tazobactam therapy is effective and safe empirical antibacterial therapy in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies.

Piperacillin/tazobactam-induced seizure rapidly reversed by high flux hemodialysis in a patient on peritoneal dialysis

Despite popular use of piperacillin, the dire neurotoxicity associated with piperacillin still goes unrecognized, leading to a delay in appropriate management. We report a 57-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), who developed slurred speech, tremor, bizarre behavior, progressive mental confusion, and 2 episodes of generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) after 5 doses of piperacillin/tazobactam (2 g/250 mg) were given for bronchiectasis with secondary infection. The laboratory data revealed normal plasma electrolyte and ammonia levels but leukocytosis. Neurologic examinations showed dysarthria and bilateral Babinski sign. Computed tomography of brain and electroencephalogram were unremarkable. Despite the use of antiepileptic agents, another GTCS episode recurred after the sixth dose of piperacillin/tazobactam. Brain magnetic resonance imaging did not demonstrate acute infarction and organic brain lesions. Initiation of high-flux hemodialysis rapidly reversed the neurologic symptoms within 4 hours. Piperacillin-induced encephalopathy should be considered in any uremic patients with unexplained neurological manifestations. CAPD is inefficient in removing piperacillin, whereas hemodialysis can rapidly terminate the piperacillin-induced encephalopathy.

Piperacillin-tazobactam in pediatric cancer patients younger than 25 months: a retrospective multicenter survey

Piperacillin-Tazobactam (Pip-Taz) is an evidence-based empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia in adolescents and adults. No data are available in pediatric cancer patients <25 months of age. In this retrospective, multicenter data survey, the analysis focuses on safety, tolerance, and efficacy. The daily dose administered was 240 mg/kg given in three equally divided doses. Data on 156 Pip-Taz treatment courses in 69 children <25 months from five pediatric cancer treatment centers (2001-2005) were analyzed. The median duration of treatment with Pip-Taz was 5 days (range, 1-23 days; 1-12 Pip-Taz courses per patient). Pip-Taz was started on the first day of fever in 90% of all courses, in 6% in the first 72 h, and in 4% as second- or third-line agent. Forty-five percent of all patients were neutropenic. In all patients, the outcome was favorable independent whether Pip-Taz was given as monotherapy (42 courses; 27%) or in combination. Overall, Pip-Taz was well tolerated and discontinued due to adverse events in only two patients who experienced non-life-threatening allergic reactions (skin rash and wheezing). The results of this study are preliminary due to the methodological limitations of a retrospective survey. Taking this bias into consideration, Pip-Taz appears to be a safe, and feasible alternative in pediatric cancer patients with febrile neutropenia <25 months of age suggesting that the inclusion of children of all age groups in future prospective controlled studies evaluating Pip-Taz is justified.

Piperacillin-tazobactam: a beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination

Piperacillin-tazobactam is a beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity that includes Gram-positive and -negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Piperacillin-tazobactam retains its in vitro activity against broad-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and some extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, but not against isolates of Gram-negative bacilli harboring AmpC beta-lactamases. Piperacillin-tazobactam has recently been reformulated to include ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and sodium citrate; this new formulation has been shown to be compatible in vitro with the two aminoglycosides, gentamicin and amikacin, allowing for simultaneous Y-site infusion, but not with tobramycin. Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded clinical trials have demonstrated piperacillin-tazobactam to be as clinically effective as relevant comparator antibiotics. Clinical trials have demonstrated piperacillin-tazobactam to be effective for the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infections, skin and soft tissue infections, lower respiratory tract infections, complicated urinary tract infections, gynecological infections and more recently, febrile neutropenia. Piperacillin-tazobactam has an excellent safety and tolerability profile and continues to be a reliable option for the empiric treatment of moderate-to-severe infections in hospitalized patients.

Treating diabetic foot infections with sequential intravenous to oral moxifloxacin compared with piperacillin–tazobactam/amoxicillin–clavulanate

OBJECTIVES

Complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs), including diabetic foot infections (DFIs), are often polymicrobial, requiring combination or broad-spectrum therapy. Moxifloxacin, a broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone, is approved for cSSSI and can be administered by either intravenous (iv) or oral routes. To assess the efficacy of moxifloxacin for treating DFIs, we analysed a subset of patients with these infections who were enrolled in a prospective, double-blind study that compared the efficacy of moxifloxacin with piperacillin-tazobactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate.

METHODS

Patients>or=18 years of age with a DFI requiring initial iv therapy were randomized to either moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) or piperacillin-tazobactam (3.0/0.375 g every 6 h) for at least 3 days followed by moxifloxacin (400 mg/day orally) or amoxicillin-clavulanate (800 mg every 12 h orally), if appropriate, for 7-14 days. DFI was usually defined as any foot infection plus a history of diabetes. Our primary efficacy outcome was the clinical response of the infection at test-of-cure (TOC), 10-42 days post-therapy.

RESULTS

Among 617 patients enrolled in the original study, 78 with DFIs were evaluable for treatment efficacy. Clinical cure rates at TOC were similar for moxifloxacin and piperacillin-tazobactam/amoxicillin-clavulanate (68% versus 61%) for patients with investigator-defined infection (P=0.54). Overall pathogen eradication rates in the microbiologically-valid population were 69% versus 66% for moxifloxacin and comparator, respectively (P=1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous+/-oral moxifloxacin was as effective as iv piperacillin-tazobactam+/-amoxicillin-clavulanate in treating moderate-to-severe DFIs. Moxifloxacin may have potential as a monotherapy regimen for DFIs.

Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Study of Efficacy, Safety, And Tolerability of Intravenous Ertapenem Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Treatment of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections in Hospitalized Adults

BACKGROUND

Complicated intra-abdominal infections are a common problem in surgical practice. This study compared the effectiveness of ertapenem (1 g qd) and piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g q6h) in the treatment of these infections.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized study conducted in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections. Of the 535 patients screened, 500 were stratified on the basis of disease severity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score < or =10 or >10), then randomized (1:1) to 4-14 days of treatment with one of the regimens and six weeks of followup. Nearly all patients (N = 494) were treated. The primary endpoint was the proportion of microbiologically evaluable patients with a favorable clinical response (cure) at two weeks. Non-inferiority of ertapenem was based on a difference in response rate of <15 percentage points compared with piperacillin/tazobactam (lower bound of the 95% CI > -15).

RESULTS

Of the 494 treated patients, 231 were microbiologically evaluable, with 123 and 108 patients in the ertapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam groups, respectively. Statistically similar cure rates were observed in the ertapenem (82.1%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (81.7%) groups (difference 0.3 [95% CI: -9.6, 10.5]). The pathogens isolated most frequently were Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis, and Bacteroides thetaiotamicron, typical isolates associated with intra-abdominal infections. There were no statistical differences between the groups in serious drug-related clinical adverse events, drug-related clinical adverse experiences leading to study discontinuation, or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Ertapenem was non-inferior to piperacillin/tazobactam in the cure of intra-abdominal infections caused by susceptible pathogens. Both study drugs generally were well tolerated.

Systematic Review of Piperacillin-Induced Neutropenia

Because penicillin agents are implicated in granulopoiesis inhibition, healthcare professionals frequently consider discontinuation of such therapy in patients with decreasing white blood cell counts. No systematic review to date has described piperacillin and the patient population at risk for this adverse drug reaction (ADR). This review sought to assess the occurrence of piperacillin-induced neutropenia, describe characteristics of affected patients and assess the reporting modalities that most accurately classify this ADR. Case reports, cohort studies and clinical trials identified by comprehensive searches of PubMed and the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) database were reviewed for patient demographics, duration and dose of piperacillin or piperacillin-tazobactam treatment and the occurrence of neutropenia. Causality assessments were performed. Six published case reports, three cohort studies, 178 clinical trials and two compilations of phase I-III trials were reviewed. Review of case reports was notable in that the duration of beta-lactam therapy prior to the noting of leukopenia always exceeded 15 days. No deaths were recorded in this group. Among 13,816 patients enrolled in non-neutropenic fever studies, the occurrence of piperacillin-induced neutropenia was rare: five patients (0.04%) developed neutropenia; none died. The demographics for this group were poorly documented. Through the AERS database, we identified 366 unique cases of piperacillin or piperacillin-tazobactam-induced haematological abnormalities, including neutropenia (n = 183, 50.0%), leukopenia, (n = 99, 27%), agranulocytosis (n = 58, 15.8%) and others. In 62 cases, patients received between 1 and 14 days of therapy (mean 7.7 + 4.1 days). Overall, there were 82 (22.4%) deaths. Reports of haematological ADRs among patients receiving piperacillin or piperacillin-tazobactam are rare. Report of neutropenia associated with piperacillin usage prior to 15 days of therapy is a novel finding that requires further evaluation. Current reporting methods poorly characterise patient groups at risk.

Piperacillin/tazobactam vs imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia--a double blind prospective multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) with its broad spectrum of antibacterial activity is used widely for the treatment of moderate to severe polymicrobial nosocomial infections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The efficacy and safety of P/T was compared with imipenem/cilastatin (I/C) in patients with established nosocomial pneumonia. This multicentre study took place from January 1999 to December 2001. Due to difficulties in recruiting sufficient patients it was terminated prematurely. In all, 221 patients were randomly assigned to either P/T at 4 g/0.5 g (n = 110) or I/C at 1 g/1 g (n = 111). Additional aminoglycoside therapy was mandatory if Pseudomonas aeruginosa was present. The ITT population (107 P/T and 110 I/C patients) was used for the analysis of efficacy.

RESULTS

The clinical efficacy was equally good for the P/T and I/C groups; 71% [95% CI 61.3, 79.2] vs 77.3% [95% CI 68.1, 84.5] at the end of therapy, 66.4% [95% CI 56.5, 75] vs 70% [95% CI 60.4, 78.2] on day 3, a nd 59.8% [95% CI 49.9, 69] vs 66.4% [95% CI 56.6, 74.9] on day 14 after therapy, respectively. Proven or assumed bacterial eradication at the end of therapy was 45.8% (P/T) and 52.7% (I/C). Treatment-related adverse events (AE) were recorded in 30% of P/T patients and 25.2% I/C patients. There were ten serious treatment-related AEs in the P/T group and five in the I/C group.

CONCLUSION

Although numbers were inadequate for full statistical evaluation, P/T and I/C were similarly effective in the treatment of severe nosocomially acquired pneumonia.

Kinetics of galactomannan in surgical patients receiving perioperative piperacillin/tazobactam prophylaxis

OBJECTIVES

The association between piperacillin/tazobactam and the positivity of the galactomannan (GM) detection ELISA test is well described. Little information is available about the kinetics of GM in patients treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. The present study aimed at clarifying the baseline interaction between piperacillin/tazobactam and GM in patients receiving this drug.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven patients undergoing abdominal surgery received perioperative prophylaxis with piperacillin/tazobactam. Each patient received three doses of 4.5 g of the drug, administered at 8 h intervals (one before and two after surgery). Three patients received antibiotic batches with 'medium' (GM-index = 1.782) and four patients received antibiotic batches with 'high' (GM-index = 6.665) GM content. Serum samples for GM evaluation were collected before drug infusion and at times +1, +3, +6 and +8 h after the first and third infusions.

RESULTS

GM levels increased after infusion, in particular when batches with 'high' GM content were used. Moreover, a non-statistically significant increase between the first dose and the third dose was observed. All samples taken >6 h after administration were negative (GM-index < 0.2), both with the 'medium' and the 'high' GM content batches.

CONCLUSIONS

The low content of GM 8 h after piperacillin/tazobactam infusion suggests that in non-neutropenic cancer patients with solid tumours receiving up to three doses of piperacillin/tazobactam, serum sampling for GM detection should be performed immediately before the next piperacillin/tazobactam administration.

Piperacillin-tazobactam-induced drug hypersensitivity syndrome

The drug hypersensitivity syndrome (DHS) is a rare but serious and potentially life-threatening reaction to common drugs in predisposed individuals. The syndrome is a triad of fever, skin eruption, and internal organ involvement. Prompt identification and discontinuation of the offending drug with symptomatic treatment of toxic effects is the mainstay of therapy for DHS.