Irinotecan plus capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer

Capecitabine, an oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug, is increasingly replacing intravenous i.v. 5-FU/leucovorin in colorectal cancer treatment. THE AIM of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination chemotherapy of irinotecan plus capecitabine (XELIRI), in patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients received first-line chemotherapy with capecitabine (1.000 mg/m2 twice daily) on days 1-14 and irinotecan (240 mg/m2) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Baseline characteristics: 24 men, 16 women; median age 64.5 years. Most common metastatic sites were the liver (55%), lymph nodes (45%), lung (22.5%) and bones (17.5%).

RESULTS

There were 12 partial responses (30%), 11 cases of stable disease (27.5%), and 17 cases of disease progression (42.5%). The median survival was 16 months (range, 6-26 months) and median progression-free survival was 7 months (range, 3-14 months). Frequently encountered therapy-related events were leukopenia and gastrointestinal side effects including diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

XELIRI is a well-tolerated regimen, with an activity comparable to, but more convenient than, irinotecan-5-FU i.v. combinations in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer.

[A case of occult breast cancer successfully treated by capecitabine in combination with weekly paclitaxel followed by FEC (75)]

A 78-year-old woman was referred to our hospital complaining of a hard nodule on the left side of her neck. Histological examination of this nodule showed metastatic carcinoma from breast cancer. Further examination revealed paraaortic lymph node swelling and no breast tumors. We diagnosed her tumors as occult breast cancer and its metastasis to lymph nodes (cT0N3cM1, Stage IV). We used weekly paclitaxel followed by a FEC75 regimen. The neck nodule size did not change after administration twice. We added capecitabine to the weekly paclitaxel, which had decreased the size of the nodule immediately. After this chemotherapy, PET-CT revealed that the lymph node metastasis had disappeared completely. It was considered that the addition of capecitabine in the early phase of the regimen was useful for this case.

Palliative treatment for elderly patients with colon cancer in ten Italian medical oncology units

BACKGROUND

Palliative chemotherapy significantly reduces mortality in patients with stage IV colon cancer, but is less prescribed with rising age. In this paper, we highlight the pattern of palliative treatment and possible effects on survival among elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January to December 2004, 78 files on the management of stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients over 70 years, collected from 10 Italian Centres, were retrospectively examined. Determinants of receipt of palliative chemotherapy and their relation to toxicity and survival were considered.

RESULTS

The proportion of elderly patients receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy was 98.7% and it was evaluated according to age, gender, educational level and comorbidities; patients receiving second-line therapy comprised 47.4%, those receiving third-line therapy 14.1% and those treated with a fourth-line therapy totalled 2.6%. Forty-one percent of patients received best supportive care (BSC) alone.

CONCLUSION

In Italy, a proportion of elderly patients with metastatic chemonaive CRC are usually treated with a tolerability and overall survival similar to those for the younger population. Among progressive patients after second-line therapy, 45.8% usually undergo third line therapy; the remaining 54.2% undergo BSC.

Delayed leukoencephalopathy with stroke-like presentation in chemotherapy recipients

BACKGROUND

A transient leukoencephalopathy mimicking cerebrovascular accident has been described as a complication of chemotherapy, most commonly in recipients of intrathecal methotrexate for childhood leukaemia. Recently published neuroimaging data suggest a common pathophysiology associated with a variety of chemotherapy agents and modes of administration.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical literature for single reports and case series of patients presenting with stroke-like episodes while receiving systemic or intrathecal chemotherapy. We only included studies providing detailed neuroimaging data. Patients with cerebrovascular accidents were excluded.

RESULTS

We identified 27 reports of toxic leukoencephalopathy in patients treated with methotrexate (intrathecal, systemic), 5-fluorouracil and its derivative carmofur, and capecitabine. Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) of all patients revealed well demarcated hyperintense lesions within the subcortical white matter of the cerebral hemispheres and the corpus callosum, corresponding to areas of decreased proton diffusion on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps (available in 21/27 patients). Lesions exceeded the confines of adjacent vascular territories. Complete resolution of symptoms within 1-4 days was accompanied by normalisation of ADC abnormalities. However, fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences frequently revealed persistent white matter abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Several pathophysiological models of delayed leukoencephalopathy after exposure to intrathecal or systemic chemotherapy have been proposed. DWI findings in this cohort are indicative of cytotoxic oedema within cerebral white matter and lend support to an at least partially reversible metabolic derangement as the basis for this syndrome.

Rectal cancer adjuvant chemotherapy: when is more useful?

THE AIM of the study was to evaluate time-to-progression (TTP) of rectal cancer in a group of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) after combined neoadjuvant treatment. A secondary end-point was to identify the possible influence of clinical TNM (cTNM) or pathological TNM (pTNM) on TTP and overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2000 to December 2005, 101 consecutive rectal cancer patients who had been neoadjuvantly treated and had underne adjuvant CHT were retrospectively examined. The variables considered were age, gender and clinical and pathological effect of CHT administration.

RESULTS

The mean age was 59 years (29-78 years) and the male:female ratio, 61:40. Forty-two patients had a lower (< or =5 cm from the anal verge), 54 a middle (from 6 to 10 cm) and 5 a higher (=10 cm) rectal lesion. All the patients had received the full course of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) while 26.7% patients had received a reduced number of neoadjuvant CHT cycles. All the patients had undergone surgery and had received adjuvant chemotherapy which was completed in only 77.2% of the cases. Tumour down-staging and complete remissions were reported in 75.2% and 14.8% of cases, respectively. TTP and OS at 3 years were 81.2% and 91.1%, respectively. Out of locally recurrent patients, 77.8% were N+ (p=0.0026) at the pathological evaluation.

CONCLUSION

In our series, neither administration of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.44) nor age > or =70 years (p=0.51), clinical stage III (p=0.67), tumour down-staging (p=0.44) and achievement of pCR (p=0.66) appeared to have a significant impact on TTP; only pN+ (patients "not responders" to a neoadjuvant CHT-RT) influenced local relapse requiring more accurate postoperative treatment and confirming the literature data about the utility of adjuvant therapy in stage III disease.

Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab when added to first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (either capecitabine plus oxaliplatin [XELOX] or fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin [FOLFOX-4]) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with MCRC were randomly assigned, in a 2 x 2 factorial design, to XELOX versus FOLFOX-4, and then to bevacizumab versus placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 1,401 patients were randomly assigned in this 2 x 2 analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.4 months in the bevacizumab group and 8.0 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 97.5% CI, 0.72 to 0.95; P = .0023). Median overall survival was 21.3 months in the bevacizumab group and 19.9 months in the placebo group (HR, 0.89; 97.5% CI, 0.76 to 1.03; P = .077). Response rates were similar in both arms. Analysis of treatment withdrawals showed that, despite protocol allowance of treatment continuation until disease progression, only 29% and 47% of bevacizumab and placebo recipients, respectively, were treated until progression. The toxicity profile of bevacizumab was consistent with that documented in previous trials.

CONCLUSION

The addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved PFS in this first-line trial in patients with MCRC. Overall survival differences did not reach statistical significance, and response rate was not improved by the addition of bevacizumab. Treatment continuation until disease progression may be necessary in order to optimize the contribution of bevacizumab to therapy.

[A case of triple negative recurrent breast cancer successfully treated with capecitabine+docetaxel combination chemotherapy]

A 73-year-old woman underwent pectoralis-preserving mastectomy for left breast cancer (papillotubular carcinoma, f, T2, ly0, v0, N1 (21/21), T2N1M0 (Stage IIB), ER (-), PgR (-), HER2 (-)) in August 2004. It was called a triple negative breast cancer. She received systemic chemotherapy using AC followed by paclitaxel. In February 2006 (disease- free interval of one year and five months), skin and chest wall recurrences in the left breast were revealed. Systemic chemotherapy using capecitabine (1,800 mg/body/day) monotherapy resulted in PD after 4 courses. Subsequently, treatment with capecitabine+cyclophosphamide combination therapy resulted in PD after 6 courses. Since November 2006, treatment with capecitabine+docetaxel combination chemotherapy was initiated. Each course consisted of capecitabine at a dosage of 1,800 mg/body/day for 2 weeks and docetaxel at a dosage of 60 mg/body (day 8 only) followed by withdrawal for 1 week. After 3 courses, a marked response was seen, and a total of 6 courses were performed. No serious side effect was revealed, and a marked response has been maintained. It is suspected that capecitabine+docetaxel combination therapy is useful for a triple negative recurrent breast cancer which is refractory to systemic chemotherapy.

Oral vinorelbine plus capecitabine (oral vincap) combination in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). A phase II study of the GOIM (Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale)

BACKGROUND

Vinorelbine i.v. and capecitabine are two of the most effective single agents in previously treated advanced breast cancer (ABC). A number of studies have been reported with the combination of these agents. Actually, the availability of oral formulation for vinorelbine allows a full oral combination of the two agents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of this novel combination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight advanced breast cancer patients refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes were included in this study. Treatment consisted of vinorelbine 60 mg/m(2) (days 1 + 8), and capecitabine 2000 mg/m(2) (days 2-7 and 9-16) every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 228 courses were given with a mean of three cycles/patient (range 1-12). Five patients (13.1%) had no toxicity at all. Hematologic side-effects were: neutropenia grade 2-3 in seven patients (18.9%) and grade 4 in one patient (2.7%), anemia grade 1 in 11 patients (29.7%), grade 2-3 in five patients (13.5%), thrombocytopenia grade 1 in six patients (16.2%) and grade 3 in one patient (2.7%). Non-hematologic side-effects were: fatigue grade 1 in five patients (13.5%), hand-foot syndrome grade 1 in two patients (5.4%) and grade 2 in two patients (5.4%), nausea/vomiting grade 1 in two patients (5.4%), grade 2 in three patients (8.1%) and grade 3 in one patient (2.7%), constipation grade 1 in two patients (5.4%), peripheral neurotoxicity grade 1 in three patients (8.1%) and grade 2 in one patient (2.7%), gastric pain grade 1 in two patients (5.4%), stomatitis grade 1 in three patients (8.1%) and grade 2 in one patient (2.7%). Out of 38 patients assessable, we observed two (5.4%) CR, 13 (34 %) PR, 14 (37.8%) SD and nine (26.3%) PD. The median time to progression was 4.5 months (range 1-18 months), the median response duration was 7 months (range 2-18 months) and the median survival duration was 10 months (range 2-26+).

CONCLUSIONS

The oral vincap should be considered as an alternative to single agent capecitabine or vinorelbine in ABC refractory to antra-taxane combination.

[A pilot clinical trial of gemcitabine and capecitabine chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma failing immunotherapy]

We have treated 8 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma for whom prior immunotherapy proved uneffective. The patients consisted of 6 males and 2 females, with a median age of 68 years. One patient had a primary site in place and 5 patients had multiple organs involvement. The chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) div at day 1, 8 and capecitabine 1,657 mg/m(2)/day p.o. at day 1-14, followed by a week rest period. Then, the regimen was repeated every 3 weeks. No treatment response was observed. There were two SD, three SD to PD, and two PD after a median of 3 cycles of treatment. The median time to disease progression was 9.1 months, and the one-year progression- free survival rate was 83%. Adverse effects were observed in 3 cases (37.5%), however, treatment was well tolerated. Despite the limited anti-tumor efficacy, it would be meaningful that the treatment brought disease stabilization to the majority of this group of patients.

Application of pressure mapping techniques to measure push and gripping forces with precision

Gripping and push forces, also named coupling forces, have induced effects on the transmission of the vibration in the upper limb. The assessment of the vibration exposure with powered tools thus requires that these man/machine coupling parameters are controlled and monitored. To date, no reliable metrological systems enable their precise measurements. This study first investigated how much precision could be expected from the pressure mapping technique for the determination of coupling forces by means of numerical integration. Then a specific procedure was worked out and validated to instrument hand-held tools and measure the coupling forces with regard to the appropriate current standards. The proposed method was applied as a case study on an ordinary breaker and an anti-vibration breaker.

[Clinical observation of XELOX (Capecitabine puls Oxaliplatin): an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen used in stage III colorectal cancer]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen: XELOX (Capecitabine puls Oxaliplatin) used after curative resection for stage III colorectal cancer.

METHODS

From Jan. 1998 to Jan. 2004, 256 cases with stage III colorectal cancer randomized received de Gramont, modified FOLFOX4 (mFOLFOX4) and XELOX regimens. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared within the three groups and relative prognosis factors within mFOLFOX4 and XELOX groups. Therapeutic adverse events were recorded and analyzed with Kaplan-Meier test.

RESULTS

98, 87 and 71 cases were respectively enrolled in the de Gramont, mFOLFOX4 and XELOX groups, mFOLFOX4 and XELOX had superior efficacy compared with de Gramont regimen. The two former could significantly improve 3-year DFS (79.7% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.015; 81.5% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.004) and medium survival time (40.2 mon vs. 37.8 mon, P = 0.024; 41.4 mon vs. 37.8 mon, P = 0.014). Meanwhile they could respectively decrease the ratio of recurrence risk by 18.0% (P = 0.024) and 21.0% (P = 0.003). The relative benefit of mFOLFOX4 versus XELOX didn't differ for 3-year DFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-1.12, P = 0.13] and OS (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84-1.06, P = 0.54). In the analysis of DFS in relative prognosis factors, XELOX had a better trend of survival advantage. mFOLFOX4 had higher adverse events within these regimens, especially in grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and peripheral neurologic adverse events.

CONCLUSION

XELOX maintains its efficacy and safety ratio in advanced colorectal cancer. Patients have good tolerance and compliance. The regiment is deserves to be applied in clinical treatment. Oxaliplatin;

Results of a phase I trial of intravenous vinorelbine plus oral capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer

The management of metastatic breast cancer becomes increasingly intricate, requiring new drugs and combinations. We present here the results of a phase I study evaluating the maximal tolerated dose of vinorelbine combined with capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy. Vinorelbine was administered intravenously on days 1 and 15, and capecitabine was given orally twice daily from day 1 to 14 (three cycles every 21 days). Three out of six patients receiving vinorelbine at 25mg/m2/day and capecitabine at 2000 mg/m2/day presented with a dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of protracted grade 3 neutropenia, hand-foot syndrome and/or liver test disturbances. Despite of a dose reduction in vinorelbine (20mg/m2/day), one patient among four developed a dose-limiting febrile neutropenia. This regimen cannot be recommended as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. These findings are not in agreement with previous publications of this schedule, or with promising results using both drugs orally.

Capecitabine vs continuous infusion 5-FU in neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer. A retrospective review

BACKGROUND

Standard therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is concurrent neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation using infusional 5-fluorouracil (CIV-5-FU). Capecitabine (CAP) offers a convenient oral replacement for CIV-5-FU. There is no randomized trial comparing infusional 5-FU to capecitabine. We retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of CAP-based regimens with well-established CIV-5-FU-based regimens in LARC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected published data on 542 patients treated on either CIV-5-FU (197) or CAP (345) with concurrent radiation (external radiation treatment, XRT) for LARC. This included Phase I or II studies published or available from Pubmed. Safety was assessed by determining proportion of patients who experienced grade III/IV adverse effects. Efficacy was assessed by determining pathological complete response (pCR). Chi-square tests were used to compare the two regimens. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical tests were further corrected for multiplicity using the method of Benjamini and Yekutieli (Ann Stat, 29(4):1165-1188, 2001).

RESULTS

pCR was significantly higher in patients getting CAP vs CIV-5-FU (25 vs 13%; P = 0.008,.P adj = 0.034). Both regimens were generally well tolerated. There was no grade IV toxicity reported. Grade III hand foot syndrome was more common in the CAP group, and grade III diarrhea was more common in the CIV group.

CONCLUSIONS

CAP when compared to CIV seems to have superior efficacy with reasonable toxicities. It is reasonable to treat LARC with CAP + XRT.

[Two advanced/recurrent breast cancer cases effectively treated by trastuzumab/capecitabine combination therapy]

Trastuzumab/capecitabine combination therapy was performed for two advanced/recurrent breast cancer cases with acute deterioration of the disease. The time until partial response in the first case was 7 months and in the second case 12 months. Adverse events were slight, though a standard dose as a single drug was used for each drug. The treatment time course was shortened because capecitabine was an oral drug. Therefore, this combination therapy was expected to maintain high quality of life and obtain a high response rate.

[Gemcitabine combined with capecitabine in the treatment for 41 patients with relapsed or metastatic biliary tract carcinoma]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine with capecitabine in the chemotherapy for patients with relapsed or metastatic biliary tract carcinoma.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with unresectable relapsed or metastatic carcinoma of the biliary tract were treated from March 2000 to December 2004. The regimen consisted of intravenous administration of gemcitabine plus oral intake of capecitabine every 3 weeks for more than 2 cycles. The parameters including tumor response, clinical benefit rate,survival and safety were observed.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were valuable and 5 patients were excluded from this series due to various reasons. Eleven patients (30.1%) had a partial response and another 11 patients (30.1%) experieced stable disease with a clinical benefit rates of 61.1%. The median overall survival time and time to progression were 10 months and 6 months, respectively. The one-year survival rate was 40.0%. The adverse events including nausea, diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia were frequently observed, which were usually in grade I or II, rarely in grade III and none in grade IV (NCI-CTC).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that the regimen of gemcitabine combined with capecitabine is effective and well tolerated in patients with unresectable relapsed or metastatic carcinoma of the biliary tract.

Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative radiation therapy in combination with 5-fluoracil (5-FU) improves local tumour control in locally advanced rectal cancer. The aim of our study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of preoperative chemoradiation using the oral 5-FU prodrug capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

Sixty patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with preoperative chemoradiation. Radiotherapy consisted of a total dose of 50 Gy delivered in 25 fractions to the pelvis. Chemotherapy was concurrently administered and consisted of oral capecitabine only on radiotherapy days. Surgery was performed six to ten weeks after completion of chemoradiation.

RESULTS

The patient population consisted of 19 females and 41 males, with a median age of 61 years. All but two patients received the full dose of chemoradiation. No grade 3 or 4 haematological toxicities developed. Two patients (3%) developed grade 3 radiation dermatitis and one a grade 3 diarrhoea. All patients underwent definitive surgery; 19 patients underwent an abdominal perineal resection (APR), 25 a low anterior resection (LAR) and 16 patients a Hartmann's procedure. One patient with a low anterior resection developed an anastomotic leakage (4%). Final pathology demonstrated eight patients (13%) with a complete pathological response. Primary tumour and nodal downstaging occurred in 67 and 84% of the patients, respectively. Two patients (3%) had an R1 resection, one after an APR and one after an LAR.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiation with oral capecitabine is safe and well tolerated in locally advanced rectal cancer patients. This preoperative treatment has a considerable downstaging effect on the tumour and lymph nodes.