Detailed analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who developed cardiotoxicity on another fluoropyrimidine and switched to S-1 treatment (subgroup analysis of the CardioSwitch-study)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The CardioSwitch-study demonstrated that patients with solid tumors who develop cardiotoxicity on capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment can be safely switched to S-1, an alternative fluoropyrimidine (FP). In light of the European Medicines Agency approval of S-1 in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), this analysis provides more detailed safety and efficacy information, and data regarding metastasectomy and/or local ablative therapy (LAT), on the mCRC patients from the original study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 European centers. The primary endpoint was recurrence of cardiotoxicity after switch. For this analysis, safety data are reported for 78 mCRC patients from the CardioSwitch cohort (N = 200). Detailed efficacy and outcomes data were available for 66 mCRC patients.

RESULTS

Data for the safety of S-1 in mCRC patients were similar to the original CardioSwitch cohort and that expected for FP-based treatment, with no new concerns. Recurrent cardiotoxicity (all grade 1) with S-1-based treatment occurred in 4/78 (5%) mCRC patients; all were able to complete FP treatment. Median progression-free survival from initiation of S-1-based treatment was 9.0 months and median overall survival 26.7 months. Metastasectomy and/or LAT was performed in 33/66 (50%) patients, and S-1 was successfully used in recommended neoadjuvant/conversion or adjuvant-like combination regimens and schedules as for standard FPs.

INTERPRETATION

S-1 is a safe and effective FP alternative when mCRC patients are forced to discontinue 5-FU or capecitabine due to cardiotoxicity and can be safely used in the standard recommended regimens, settings, and schedules.

[A Case of Adenocarcinoma of Pancreatic Head of Liver Disfunction after Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Celiac Artery Stenosis Treated by Urgent Median Arcuate Ligament Release]

This patient visited our hospital for the purpose of detailed examination of prostate cancer in his seventies. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography(CT)revealed a low-density mass of 2 cm in the pancreatic head. He was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed after 2 courses of gemcitabine and S-1 therapy were performed as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. An intraoperative clamp test of the gastroduodenal artery showed that the pulsation of the common hepatic artery and the proper hepatic artery was weak but sufficient, so the gastroduodenal artery was cut and the operation was completed as planned. A blood test on the 1st day after the operation showed elevated levels of AST 537 U/L, ALT 616 U/L, and 7 hours later blood sampling showed further increases in AST 1,455 U/L, ALT 1,314 U/L. After a detailed review of the preoperative CT, celiac artery stenosis due to compression of the arcuate ligament was suspected, and urgent median arcuate ligament release was performed on the same day. Dissection of the arcuate ligament significantly improved the pulsation of the common hepatic artery and proper hepatic artery. Postoperatively, hepatic enzymes improved and ISGPS showed Grade B pancreatic juice leakage, but the patient was discharged from the hospital on the 49th postoperative day without any other complications. He took S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy, and no signs of recurrence have been observed 9 months after the operation.

Safety and Efficacy of Camrelizumab in Combination With Nab-Paclitaxel Plus S-1 for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer With Serosal Invasion

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 for the treatment of gastric cancer with serosal invasion.

Method

Two hundred patients with gastric cancer with serosal invasion who received neoadjuvant therapy from January 2012 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different neoadjuvant therapy regimens, the patients were divided into the following three groups: the SOX group (S-1 + oxaliplatin) (72 patients), SAP group (S-1 + nab-paclitaxel) (95 patients) and C-SAP group (camrelizumab + S-1 + nab-paclitaxel) (33 patients).

Result

The pathological response (TRG 1a/1b) in the C-SAP group (39.4%) was not significantly different from that in the SAP group (26.3%) and was significantly higher than that in the SOX group (18.1%). The rate of ypT0 in the C-SAP group (24.2%) was higher than that in the SAP group (6.3%) and the SOX group (5.6%). The rate of ypN0 in the C-SAP group (66.7%) was also higher than that in the SAP group (38.9%) and the SOX group (36.1%). The rate of pCR in the C-SAP group (21.2%) was higher than that in the SAP group (5.3%) and the SOX group (2.8%). The use of an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody was an independent protective factor for TRG grade (1a/1b). The use of camrelizumab did not increase postoperative complications or the adverse effects of neoadjuvant therapy.

Conclusion

Camrelizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 could significantly improve the rate of tumor regression grade (TRG 1a/1b) and the rate of pCR in gastric cancer with serosal invasion.

Phase II feasibility study of adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 followed by S-1 for stage III gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 (DCS) following S-1 therapy in patients with stage III gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy.

METHODS

Patients with stage III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy were enrolled. Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated within 8 weeks of gastrectomy. The first cycle of chemotherapy consisted of S-1 monotherapy (day 1-14), followed by a 7-day rest period. Cycles 2 and 3 consisted of the following: S-1 (day 1-14) administration, followed by a 14-day rest period, and an intravenous infusion of cisplatin and docetaxel on days 1 and 15. After two cycles, S-1 was administered for up to 1 year.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled between 2014 and 2017. Febrile neutropenia of grade 3 or higher was the most common hematological toxicity with 4 patients (13.3%). Other hematological toxicities of grade 3 or higher were as follows: neutropenia in 3 (10.0%), leukopenia in 3 (10.0%), and anemia in 2 (6.7%) patients. Most frequent non-hematological toxicity of grade 3 was anorexia (n = 4, 13.3%) and general fatigue (n = 3, 10.0%); no grade 4 non-hematological toxicities were observed. Twenty-five patients (83.3%) completed two cycles of DCS treatment and 18 (60.0%) completed subsequent S-1 treatment for 1 year. The relative dose intensity of docetaxel and cisplatin was 0.86 and that of S-1 was 0.88.

CONCLUSION

The DCS regimen can be acceptable as an adjuvant chemotherapy and offers an effective postoperative treatment option for stage III gastric cancer patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000012785 .

DATE OF REGISTRY

08/01/2014.

Efficacy and safety of S-1 following gemcitabine with cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer

Background Combination therapy of gemcitabine with cisplatin (GC) is a standard first-line therapy for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC). S-1 is often used as a second-line therapy in clinical practice, based on the results of some clinical studies investigating its efficacy and safety following gemcitabine monotherapy. However, few studies have reported on the clinical outcomes of S-1 following GC. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC for unresectable and recurrent BTC. Methods We retrospectively collected the data of 116 patients (pts) who were treated with S-1 as a second-line therapy following GC for unresectable or recurrent BTC at Shizuoka Cancer Center (November 2009 to July 2019). Results Of these 116 pts., 84 were assessable. Patient characteristics were as follows: intrahepatic bile duct/extrahepatic bile duct/gallbladder cancer, 30/23/31 pts.; metastatic/recurrent/locally advanced, 57/17/10 pts. The median time to treatment failure and overall survival were 2.5 and 6.0 months, respectively. Among 65 pts. with measurable lesions, the overall response rate was 3.1% (2/65 pts) and the disease control rate was 24.6% (19/65 pts). The common grade 3/4 toxicities included anemia (12%), neutropenia (4%), infections (16%), fatigue (6%), and diarrhea (4%). Dose reduction or treatment schedule modification of S-1 was required in 29 pts. (34.5%), and 17 pts. (20%) terminated S-1 due to adverse events. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of S-1 following GC were almost the same as those of S-1 following GEM monotherapy for unresectable or recurrent BTC.

HER2-Directed Therapy in Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Triumphs and Troubles

OPINION STATEMENT

Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers represent the third leading cause of malignancy-associated death worldwide. Approximately 15-20% of these adenocarcinomas overexpress the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), a pro-proliferative receptor tyrosine kinase that has been therapeutically exploited in other disease contexts. The landmark ToGA trial demonstrated that trastuzumab, an anti-HER2 antibody, could improve overall survival for patients with HER2 overexpressing advanced gastric and GEJ adenocarcinomas. In the ensuing decade, great effort has been made to refine and expand this therapeutic strategy through a variety of avenues including optimization of chemotherapy backbones, identifying potential synergy with immune checkpoint inhibition, deployment of alternative HER2-targeted antibodies, use of small molecule inhibitors, and development of HER2-directed antibody drug conjugates. While the results of these efforts have had variable success, they have led to a greater understanding of the mechanisms of both primary and acquired resistance to HER2-directed therapies, laying the groundwork for future investigations. Recently, KEYNOTE-811 and DESTINY-Gastric01 have led to the FDA approvals of pembrolizumab in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy in the 1st-line advanced setting and trastuzumab deruxtecan (fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki) in the 2nd-line setting, respectively. Herein, we review these significant works as well as discuss the ongoing investigations they have inspired, which aim to find and utilize additional means for targeting HER2 in gastric and GEJ cancers.

Efficacy of paclitaxel and S-1 combined with apatinib in the conversion therapy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To explore the safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel and tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil potassium (S-1) combined with apatinib in the conversion therapy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 66 patients with advanced gastric cancer received treatment with paclitaxel + S-1 + apatinib. Patients evaluated as resectable advanced gastric cancer by the multiple disciplinary team (MDT) underwent the surgery. The clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of the patients receiving conversion therapy and the related indicators of those undergoing operation were recorded. Later, the survival of the patients was compared between successful conversion therapy (surgery) group and unsuccessful conversion therapy (non-surgery) group.

RESULTS

All the 66 patients completed 3-7 cycles of chemotherapy, with a median of 5 cycles, and the objective response rate (ORR) after conversion therapy was 71.2% (47/66). Among them, 48 patients received operation for (225.2±37.3) min on average, with the intraoperative blood loss of (168.2±40.9) mL and (50.9±12.3) intraoperative dissected lymph nodes, including 34 (70.8%) cases of R0 resection. According to the postoperative pathological tumor regression grading (TRG), there were 2 (4.2%) TRG 0 cases, 10 (20.8%) TRG 1 cases, 28 (58.3%) TRG 2 cases and 8 (16.7%) TRG 3 cases. The follow-up results revealed that the one-year overall survival (OS) of the patients was 93.8% (45/48) in successful conversion therapy (surgery) group and 61.1% (11/18) in unsuccessful conversion therapy (non-surgery) group.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel and S-1 combined with apatinib can achieve a higher R0 resection rate, and improve the survival rate of patients with successful conversion therapy, showing high safety and efficacy.

Safety and efficacy of S1 monotherapy or combined with nab-paclitaxel in advanced elderly pancreatic cancer patients: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of S1 monotherapy or combination with nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of elderly patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Library, China Biology Medicine, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched without time limits according to the inclusion criteria. RevMan (Version 5.3) software was used for data extraction and meta-analysis. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were used to evaluate therapeutic effects while side effects including leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, neurotoxicity, vomit, and alopecia were extracted for evaluation. There was no need for ethical review in this study because no ethical experiments were conducted and all data used were public data. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

RESULTS

Four retrospective studies comprising 308 elderly patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in the analysis. One hundred fifty-one patients underwent S1 monotherapy and 157 received S1 combined nab-paclitaxel. Meta-analysis indicated that compared with S1 monotherapy, S1 combined with nab-paclitaxel had higher ORR (OR 2.25, 95% CI: 1.42-3.55; P = .0005) and DCR (OR 2.94, 95% CI: 1.55-5.58; P = .0009). The adverse reaction of leukopenia was higher in the combined therapy group (OR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.09-3.13, P = .02), but no significant difference was found in thrombocytopenia, neurotoxicity, vomiting, and alopecia between the 2 groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Nab-paclitaxel plus S1 was more efficient in terms of ORR and DCR than S1 monotherapy in elderly pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients while the side effect was controllable with a higher probability of leukopenia. Thus, combined nab-paclitaxel and S1 could be safely used in elderly patients.

Combination of gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and S-1(GAS) as the first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: study protocol for an open-label, single-arm phase I study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still a highly fatal malignancy among the most common cancers. More powerful treatments are expecting to bring hope for patients. Biweekly gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/S-1 (GAS) was proved safe and effective for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer in Japan. The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of GAS (repeated every 3 weeks) in the treatment of locally advanced or advanced pancreatic cancer and determine the recommended dose of S-1 in this combination.

METHODS

This is an open-label, single-arm, and single-center phase I trial. Patients who have been diagnosed with locally advanced or advanced PDAC pathologically without previous systemic treatments will be enrolled and be treated with GAS chemotherapy every 3 weeks (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m 2, ivgtt, day1, 8; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, day1, 8; different doses of S-1 within a dose escalation scheme) until the presence of disease progression (PD), intolerable adverse events (AEs), or requirement of patients and researchers. The primary endpoints are maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The secondary endpoints include safety, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

DISCUSSION

This trial will adjust the administration of GAS to make it more effective for Chinese patients, while exploring the toxicity and feasibility of this adjustment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR, ( ChiCTR1900027833 ). Registered 30 November 2019.

Uracil-tegafur vs fluorouracil as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage II and III colon cancer: A nationwide cohort study and meta-analysis

We conducted a population-based cohort study enrolling patients with Stage II and III colon cancer receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil and tegafur (UFT) or fluorouracil (5-FU) from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database from 2000 to 2015. The outcomes of the current study were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. We compared our effectiveness results from the literature by meta-analysis, which provided the best evidence. Severe adverse events were compared in meta-analysis of reported clinical trials. In the nationwide cohort study, UFT (14,486 patients) showed DFS similar to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (adjusted HR 1.037; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.954-1.126; P = .397) and OS (adjusted HR 0.964; 95% CI 0.891-1.041; P = .349) compared with the 5-FU (866 patients). Our meta-analysis confirmed the similarity of effectiveness and found the incidence of leucopaenia was statistically significantly reduced in UFT (risk ratio 0.12; 95% CI 0.02-0.67; I2 = 0%). Through our analysis, we have confirmed that UFT is a well-tolerated adjuvant therapy choice, and has similar treatment efficacy as 5-FU in terms of DFS and OS in patients with Stage II and III colon cancer.

Randomized phase II study of daily and alternate-day administration of S-1 for adjuvant chemotherapy in completely-resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer: results of the Setouchi Lung Cancer Group Study 1301

BACKGROUND

The aim of this multicenter, randomized phase II study was to analyze the feasibility and safety of alternate-day S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected pathological stage I (tumor diameter > 2 cm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for 1 year comprising either alternate-day oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 4 days a week (Group A) or a 2-week oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) followed by 1 week of rest (Group B). The primary endpoint was feasibility, which was defined as the proportion of patients who completed the allocated intervention for 6 months with a relative dose intensity (RDI) of 70% or more.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were enrolled of whom 90 patients received S-1 treatment. Median follow-up was 66.9 months. The treatment completion rate based on an RDI of 70% or more for 6 months was 84.4% (95%CI; 70.5-93.5%) in group A and 64.4% (95%CI; 48.8-78.1%) in group B. There were no grade 4 adverse events in either group. Moderate or severe adverse events (grade 2 or grade 3) were significantly more frequent in group B (67%) compared with group A (29%, P = 0.001). The 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 87.0 and 80.9% for group A and B, respectively (P = 0.451). The 5-year overall survival rate for all patients (n = 93) was 100 and 89.4% for group A and B, respectively (P = 0.136).

CONCLUSION

Alternate-day oral administration of S-1 for 1 year as adjuvant chemotherapy was demonstrated to be feasible with low toxicity in completely resected stage I (tumor diameter > 2 cm) NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number: UMIN000011994 . Date of registration: 10/8/2013.

Efficacy of apatinib combined with tegafur gimeracil and oteracil potassium in the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium (S-1) in the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 126 patients with advanced gastric cancer admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to September 2018 were enrolled as the research objects, none of whom underwent surgery. For these patients, second-line treatment was recommended due to the failure of first-line treatment. According to the different therapeutic options, patients were categorized into S-1 group (n=63) and Apatinib group (S-1 combined with apatinib, n=63), and drugs were administered orally. The clinical efficacy, serological indicators, adverse reactions and immune function were compared between the two groups. Besides, the survival status of patients was recorded through follow-up.

RESULTS

In S-1 group and Apatinib group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 30.2% (19/63) vs. 50.8% (32/63) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 54.0% (34/63) vs. 74.6% (47/63), respectively. The results indicated that Apatinib group was superior to S-1 group in terms of ORR and DCR, suggesting statistically significant differences (p=0.018, p=0.016). Compared with those before treatment, the serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and tumor supplied group of factors (TSGF) in the two groups of patients were prominently reduced after treatment (p<0.05). After treatment, CA19-9 and TSGF levels were remarkably lower in Apatinib group than those in S-1 group (p=0.008, p=0.023), and there was no statistically significant difference in the CEA level between the two groups (p=0.057). After treatment, the quality of life of patients was improved notably in Apatinib group compared with that in S-1 group (p=0.002). Adverse reactions mainly involved hematological toxicity, nausea and vomiting, abnormal renal function, impairment of hepatic function, neurotoxicity, hypertension and hand-foot syndrome, most of which were in grade I-II and relieved after symptomatic treatment and could be tolerated for continued treatment. Serious adverse reactions in grade III-IV occurred rarely. No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence rate of adverse reactions between the two groups of patients (p>0.05). Besides, according to the follow-up results, median overall survival (OS) was 8.1 months vs. 10.7 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months vs. 5.3 months, respectively, in S-1 group and Apatinib group. The results of log-rank test demonstrated that Apatinib group was superior to S-1 group with respect to OS, showing a statistically significant difference (p=0.028), and no statistically significant difference was found in PFS between the two groups of patients (p=0.159).

CONCLUSION

In the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, apatinib combined with S-1 is superior to S-1 alone in term of clinical efficacy, and its adverse reactions can be tolerated. Apatinib combined with S-1 can prominently improve the quality of life, reduce the serum tumor marker levels and prolong the OS of patients, but it cannot extend the PFS.

Apatinib combined with S-1 as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer

ABSTRACT

Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients are not tolerant to the toxicities of traditional chemotherapy and its second-line therapeutic regimens are limited. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 as the second-line therapy for AGC patients.Patients with AGC were enrolled in this study. Patients received oral apatinib (250 mg to 500 mg once daily) and S-1(40 mg/m2 twice daily) on days 1-14. Each cycle was 28 days and one course of treatment consisted of 2 cycles. Clinical efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were observed. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis.From November 2015 to December 2017, 58 AGC patients who failed first-line chemotherapy were enrolled and assessed retrospectively. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) standard, all patients were evaluable for response. None achieved CR, and 10 (17.2%) achieved PR (95% CI 7.2%-27.3%). SD was observed in 58.6% (34/58) of patients (95% CI 45.6%-71.7%) and NR in 24.1% (14/58) of patients (95% CI 12.8%-35.5%). The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 17.2% and 75.8% respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 143.1 days (95% CI 121.7-164.5) and 211.6 days (95% CI 162.9-219.7) respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that the ECOG PS was the independent factor of PFS and OS for AGC patients (PFS: HR = 3.565, 95% CI: 2.25-5.65, P < .001; OS: HR = 3.676, 95% CI: 2.29-5.89, P < .001). The main AEs were fatigue (72.4%), hypertension (46.6%), and leukopenia (48.3%).Apatinib combined with S-1 showed promising efficiency and was well tolerated as the second-line therapy for AGC patients. ECOG PS was the independent factor of PFS and OS for AGC patients. AEs were moderate and controllable, and leukopenia or hypertension was predictable factors for the PFS and OS of AGC patients.

A multicenter phase II study of TAS-114 in combination with S-1 in patients with pretreated advanced gastric cancer (EPOC1604)

BACKGROUND

This is a phase 2 study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of TAS-114, a novel deoxyuridine triphosphatase inhibitor, combined with S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

Eligible patients had AGC with measurable lesions, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, v1.1), with two or more previous chemotherapy regimens including fluoropyrimidines, platinum agents, and taxanes or irinotecan. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to the RECIST, v1.1. Twenty-nine patients were required according to Simon's optimal two-stage design, with one-sided a = 5% and power = 80%. Threshold and expected ORRs were 5% and 25%. Patients received TAS-114 (400 mg/body, twice a day) and S-1 (30 mg/m², twice a day) for 14 days, followed by 7 days of rest in one 3-week cycle. Protein expression levels of dUTPase and BRCA1 in tumor samples were determined by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Accrual was terminated in June 2018 because meeting the predefined efficacy criteria was considered difficult. ORR and disease control rate were 5.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1-24.9%] and 70.0% (95% CI, 45.7-88.1%), respectively, for all 20 patients enrolled. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 2.4 months (95% CI, 1.2-3.3 months) and 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.2-9.4 months), respectively. Median PFS in the groups with high and low dUTPase protein expression in the cytoplasm was 2.8 months (95% CI, 1.4-3.9) and 1.6 months (95% CI, 0.6-2.4), respectively [hazard ratio, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.16-1.04), log-rank test two-sided p = 0.047]. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events included anemia (20%), leucopenia (15%), neutropenia (10%), rash (10%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and lymphopenia (5%) CONCLUSIONS: TAS-114 with S-1 showed only modest antitumor activity with acceptable safety profiles for patients heavily pretreated with AGC.

Multicenter phase III trial of S-1 and cisplatin versus S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SOPP trial)

BACKGROUND

In East Asia, S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) is one of the standard first-line chemotherapy regimens for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC). Oxaliplatin is generally less toxic and more convenient to administer than cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, phase III study assessing whether S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) was non-inferior/superior to SP in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with MRGC were randomized 1:1 to receive either SOX (S-1 80 mg/m²/day on days 1-14; oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² on day 1; every 3 weeks) or SP (S-1 80 mg/m²/day on days 1-14; cisplatin 60 mg/m² on day 1; every 3 weeks [SP3]).

RESULTS

Between October 2012 and October 2014, 338 patients were randomized. The median age was 56 years, and 51% of patients had measurable lesions. SOX was significantly non-inferior but not superior to SP3 in terms of PFS [median 5.6 versus 5.7 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.07]. In patients with measurable disease, objective response rates were similar between SOX and SP3 (58% versus 60%). Overall, the survival in both groups did not differ (median 12.9 versus 11.4 months; HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.66-1.11). Treatment was well tolerated in both arms. Anemia, leucopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and oral mucositis were more common with SP3. In contrast, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with SOX.

CONCLUSIONS

SOX was non-inferior to SP3. The two regimens were well tolerated with different toxicity profiles. The SOX regimen can be recommended as a first-line treatment for MRGC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01671449.

Modified gemcitabine, S-1, and leucovorin combination for patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A multi-center retrospective study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

In pancreatic cancer, toxicities associated with current chemotherapeutic regimens remain concerning. A modified combination of gemcitabine, S-1, and leucovorin (GSL) was used as the first-line treatment for newly diagnosed locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.

METHODS

GSL was administered every 2 weeks-intravenous gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 at a fixed-dose rate of 10 mg/m2/min on day 1 and oral S-1 (80-120 mg/day) plus leucovorin 30 mg twice daily on days 1-7. We retrospectively analyzed the feasibility of GSL and patient outcomes in three medical centers in Taiwan.

RESULTS

Overall, 49 patients received GSL with a median follow-up of 24.9 months from May 2015 to March 2019. The median patient age was 68 years (range, 47-83 years), with a marginally higher number of females (57.1%). Among the 44 patients who underwent image evaluation, 13 demonstrated a partial response (29.5%) and 17 presented with stable disease (38.6%). The partial response rate and stable disease rate was 26.5% and 34.7%, respectively, in the intent-to-treat analysis. The median time-to-treatment failure was 5.79 months (95% C.I., 2.63-8.94), progression-free survival was 6.94 months (95% C.I., 5.55-8.33), and overall survival time was 11.53 months (95% C.I., 9.94-13.13). For GSL treatment, the most common grade 3 or worse toxicities were anemia (18.3%), neutropenia (6.1%), nausea (4.1%), and mucositis (4.1%). Treatment discontinuation was mostly due to disease progression (65.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified GSL therapy can be a promising and affordable treatment for patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer in Taiwan. A prospective trial of modified GSL for elderly patients is currently ongoing in Taiwan.

Phase I/II study of erlotinib plus S-1 for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG) 0808/0913

Introduction In preclinical data, the combination therapy with S-1 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) had a synergistic antitumor effect on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of the EGFR mutation status. Patients and Methods Patients with previously treated NSCLC and adequate organ function regardless of EGFR mutation status were eligible for the phase I study, with wild-type EGFR were eligible for the phase II study. Treatment consisted of erlotinib 150 mg/body orally once every day and S-1 60 mg/m², 70 mg/m², or 80 mg/m² (level 0, level 1, or level 2) orally on days 1-14 every three weeks. The primary endpoint for the phase I study was the determination of the recommended dose (RD), the phase II study was the overall response rate (ORR). Results A total of 7 patients with performance-status (PS) 0 or 1 were enrolled as subjects in phase I. Five of these subjects were EGFR-mutation positive. Four subjects were enrolled at S-1 dose level 1 and 3 were enrolled at S-1 dose level 2. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in these subjects. The RD was decided as erlotinib 150 mg/body and S-1 80 mg/m². In phase I, 5 subjects achieved partial response, and the ORR was 71.4%. A total of 10 patients with PS 0, 1, or 2 EGFR-wild type NSCLC were enrolled in phase II. In phase II, the ORR was 10.0%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 40.0%. After the enrollment of 10 subjects, enrollment was stopped based on two treatment-related deaths. Conclusion The combination therapy of erlotinib plus S-1 was not feasible in the EGFR wild-type NSCLC at least and early stopped. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR Identifier: 000003421 (2010/03/31, phase I), 000003422 (2010/03/31, Phase II).

Comparison of S-1-cisplatin every 5 weeks with capecitabine-cisplatin every 3 weeks for HER2-negative gastric cancer (recurrent after S-1 adjuvant therapy or chemotherapy-naïve advanced): pooled analysis of HERBIS-2 (OGSG 1103) and HERBIS-4A (OGSG 1105) trials

BACKGROUND

We previously reported the HERBIS-4A phase II trial comparing S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) with capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (GC). We performed a pooled analysis of HERBIS-4A and HERBIS-2, the phase II trial comparing SP with XP in HER2-negative recurrent GC patients with a recurrence-free interval after S-1 adjuvant therapy of ≥ 6 months.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SP [S-1 (40-60 mg twice daily for 21 days) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m² on day 8), every 5 weeks] or XP [capecitabine (1000 mg/m² twice daily for 14 days) plus cisplatin (80 mg/m² on day 1), every 3 weeks].

RESULTS

In the pooled analysis, SP (n = 44-50) showed a longer progression-free survival [6.4 versus 5.1 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.666; P = 0.062], overall survival (14.8 versus 10.6 months; HR, 0.695; P = 0.099), and time to treatment failure (4.6 versus 3.6 months; HR, 0.668; P = 0.045) as well as a higher disease control rate (86.4% versus 68.1%, P = 0.149) compared with XP (n = 47-51). A significant survival advantage for SP over XP was apparent in patients with a performance status of 0, a differentiated-type tumor histology, or a primary tumor localization to the upper portion of the stomach.

CONCLUSION

Our pooled analysis supports the use of SP in the first-line setting for patients with HER2-negative advanced or recurrent GC with a recurrence-free interval of ≥ 6 months.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The HERBIS-2 trial was registered with UMIN-CTR as UMIN000006105.

Anlotinib combined with SOX regimen (S1 (tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil porassium capsules) + oxaliplatin) in treating stage IV gastric cancer: study protocol for a single-armed and single-centred clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Anlotinib hydrochloride is a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets angiogenesis-related kinases and has already showed good safety and efficacy in some solid tumours. However, evidence on the safety and feasibility of anlotinib in patients with stage IV gastric cancer is scarce.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a single-armed and single-centred clinical study being designed to include 150 patients of stage IV gastric cancer. The patients' demographics, pathological characteristics, test results of blood, biochemistry and tumour markers before and after medication, disease-free survival and overall survival will be collected and analysed. The primary and main efficacy outcomes are objective response rate, progression-free survival, disease control rate and overall survival. The secondary efficacy outcome is safety indicator including the incidence of adverse drug reactions and adverse events after administration.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee at the First Affiliated Hospital (Xijing Hospital) of Fourth Military Medical University (KY20192111-F-1). The results of this study will be disseminated at several research conferences and as published articles in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1900026291 (registration date: 29 September 2019).

Response Shift-Adjusted Treatment Effect on Health-Related Quality of Life in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Taxane Versus S-1 for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Structural Equation Modeling

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the quantification of the response shift-adjusted treatment effect on quality-of-life (QOL) data in a randomized controlled trial of taxane versus S-1 for patients with metastatic breast cancer (SELECT-BC).

METHODS

This study was a secondary data analysis of a previously published trial. The response shift-adjusted treatment effect on health-related QOL (HRQOL) data measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was estimated using structural equation modeling techniques in addition to quantifying the "true" treatment effect. Measurement invariances in the values of the common factor loadings, intercepts, and residual variances between before treatment and at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits were considered the response shift effects.

RESULTS

In the taxane group, we observed positive recalibration effects for role functioning and positive reprioritization and negative recalibration effects for emotional functioning. The observed change of -4.56 for role functioning comprised +2.26 response shifts and -6.82 "true" change. The observed change of +9.41 for emotional functioning comprised +12.43 response shifts and -1.17 "true" change. In the S-1 group, we observed positive reprioritization and negative recalibration effects for emotional functioning and positive reprioritization effects for social functioning. The observed change of +10.54 for emotional functioning comprised +10.07 response shifts and +0.47 "true" change. The observed change of +2.43 for social functioning comprised +3.50 response shifts and -1.07 "true" change.

CONCLUSION

Detailed analysis of the response shift effects will improve the evaluation reliability of observed HRQOL data during clinical trials.

Clinical study of XiangShaLiuJunZi decoction combined with S-1 as maintenance therapy for stage III or IV gastric carcinoma and colorectal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

S-1, a new oral fluorouracil chemotherapeutical drug, has been increasingly used in clinical maintenance after first-line chemotherapy for stage III or IV gastric carcinoma (GC) and colorectal carcinoma (CRC) for its own advantages. XiangshaLiujunzi Decoction (XSLJZD), a classic traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula with effects of alleviating the adverse reactions of chemotherapy and improving the quality of life of cancer patients has been gradually confirmed, with no more reports about the maintenance therapy mode of combination of chemotherapeutic drugs and TCM. We designed the study of XSLJZD combined with S-1 in the maintenance therapy of Stage III or IV GC and CRC, and hoped that this research program will go further and comprehensively evaluate its efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of XSLJZD combined with S-1 in the maintenance therapy of stage III or IV GC and CRC.

METHODS

This study is an open, single-center, randomized study. Patients with stage III or stage IV GC and CRC will be randomized (1:1) into S-1group, S-1 combined with XSLJZD group for 5 years of maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and secondary end point was overall survival and Quality of Life Assessment (QOLA), which include an improvement in symptoms before and after treatment, Karnofsky Performance Status, and adverse events assessment.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide meaningful clinical information about the combination of chemotherapeutic drugs S-1 with TCM in the maintenance therapy of stage III or IV GC and CRC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-INR-16008575.

A case of primary ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma treated with S-1/CDDP therapy

BACKGROUND

Primary ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma is extremely rare, with only five recent case reports. Almost all reported cases of ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma have been treated with TC therapy and none have reported regarding the use of S-1/CDDP therapy. We report a case of primary ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma treated postoperatively with S-1/CDDP therapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe a 55-year-old woman diagnosed with stage IB primary ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma that was treated with S-1/CDDP therapy. Preoperative transvaginal ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a solid tumor measuring 10 cm in diameter in the pelvis. The tumor marker levels were as follows: CA125, 41.6 U/mL; CA19-9, < 2.0 U/mL; and CEA, 2.2 ng/mL. Ovarian cancer was suspected, and total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and omentectomy were performed. The left ovary was enlarged to greater than fist-sized, and there was a small amount of clear yellow ascites. Histological examination of the left ovary led to the diagnosis of signet-ring cell carcinoma. Histological examination of the right ovary also showed the presence of a signet-ring cell carcinoma. After surgery, upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and positron-emission tomography-CT were performed to search for a possible primary lesion, but none was found. The patient was diagnosed with primary ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma with FIGO Stage IB (PT1b, NX, M0). As postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, S-1/CDDP therapy (S-1120 mg/day/body × 14 days, CDDP 50 mg/m2 day 8, q 21 days) was administered for six cycles. There was no recurrence 27 months after the initial treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We considered S-1/CDDP therapy was effective for primary ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma. This is the first case report of primary ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma treated with S-1/CDDP therapy in the world.

Neoadjuvant apatinib plus S-1 in locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

About one-third of the lung tumors are staged as locally advanced at the time of initial diagnosis; however, the optimal induction treatment before curative resection has not been elucidated. To date, the evidence regarding the preoperative apatinib plus S-1 for locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma is scarce.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 29-year-old female was admitted because of persistent cough, sputum, and chest distress for 2 months.

DIAGNOSES

Primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma (cT3N2M0, IIIB) with unknown driver gene mutation status.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient had received 4 months of neoadjuvant therapy using oral apatinib (425 mg daily) plus S-1 (60 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks with a 2-week drug-free interval), followed by anatomical lobectomy with curative intent. Adjuvant apatinib (425 mg daily for a month, and 250 mg daily for another month) plus S-1 at the same dosage were administered for 2 months. Thereafter, maintenance of low-dose S-1 monotherapy (40 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks with a 2-week drug-free interval) was continued for 6 months.

OUTCOMES

The adverse events were tolerable and well-controlled. A postoperative recurrence-free survival for 2 years and a half up to now was indicated.

LESSONS

Preoperative apatinib plus S-1 showed efficacy in locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma. However, high-quality trials are warranted before the recommendation of this therapeutic regimen.

Perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in Japan: current and future perspectives

The standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer differs across the world. In western countries, perioperative chemotherapy or postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy are the preferred treatment options, whereas in Asia, D2 gastrectomy followed by postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is standard. In Japan, adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 is the standard treatment for pStage II gastric cancer, whereas adjuvant chemotherapy with a doublet regimen is preferred for pStage III gastric cancer. The efficacy of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy using S-1 plus cisplatin, has been investigated in selected patients with expected poor survival outcomes. To expand the indications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a clinical trial investigating the efficacy of preoperative S-1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with cStage III (cT3-4N1-3) gastric cancer (JCOG1509) is ongoing in Japan. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to cytotoxic chemotherapy also seems promising and is being investigated in international randomized clinical trials. Although we have to await the final results of these studies, preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising treatment strategy and likely to become standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer in Japan.

Combination of weekly streptozocin and oral S-1 treatment for patients of unresectable or metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Streptozocin (STZ) administration with or without other cytotoxic drugs remains a crucial chemotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (Pan-NENs). However, the therapeutic effects of combination treatment with weekly STZ and oral S-1 therapy (STS1) remain unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and clinical feasibility of STS1.

METHODS

Twenty of 243 Pan-NEN patients were included in this retrospective study, all of whom had received STS1 for unresectable or distant metastatic diseases from November 2015 to January 2019. The maximum tumor shrinkage rate, time course of the tumor shrinkage rate, prognosis (progression-free survival and overall survival), and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 61.5 years and the median tumor size was 35 mm. The number of NET-G1, NET-G2, NET-G3, and NEC-G3 patients was 3, 13, 3, and 1, respectively. The median Ki-67 index and mitoses were 10.2% and 2/10 high-power fields, respectively. The overall objective response rate and disease control rate were 30% and 90%, respectively. The median maximum tumor reduction rate was 19%. The Ki-67 index and tumor size did not influence the tumor shrinkage rate. Progression-free survival after STS1 treatment was 19 months with no significant difference between NET-G1/G2 and NET-G3/NEC-G3 patients (p = 0.4). There was one case each of grade 3/4 toxicity, including general fatigue, hyperglycemia, and renal dysfunction. No serious myelosuppressive events are manifested.

CONCLUSIONS

STS1 treatment is an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with advanced Pan-NEN.

Combination gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer: the FUGA-BT (JCOG1113) randomized phase III clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, it causes nausea, vomiting, and anorexia, and requires hydration. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) reportedly has equal to, or better, efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of GS to GC for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC in terms of overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We undertook a phase III randomized trial in 33 institutions in Japan. Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable BTC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 - 1, and adequate organ function. The calculated sample size was 350 with a one-sided α of 5%, a power of 80%, and non-inferiority margin hazard ratio (HR) of 1.155. The primary end point was OS, while the secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), adverse events (AEs), and clinically significant AEs defined as grade ≥2 fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, or diarrhea.

RESULTS

Between May 2013 and March 2016, 354 patients were enrolled. GS was found to be non-inferior to GC [median OS: 13.4 months with GC and 15.1 months with GS, HR, 0.945; 90% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-1.15; P = 0.046 for non-inferiority]. The median PFS was 5.8 months with GC and 6.8 months with GS (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.70-1.07). The RR was 32.4% with GC and 29.8% with GS. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. Clinically significant AEs were observed in 35.1% of patients in the GC arm and 29.9% in the GS arm.

CONCLUSIONS

GS, which does not require hydration, should be considered a new, convenient standard of care option for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

This trial has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm), number UMIN000010667.

High gamma-glutamyl hydrolase and low folylpolyglutamate synthetase expression as prognostic biomarkers in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who were administrated postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1

Purpose

The enzymes gamma-glutamyl hydrolase (GGH) and folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS) regulate intracellular folate concentrations needed for cell proliferation, DNA synthesis, and repair. High GGH expression affects 5-FU thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibition and is a risk factor for various malignancies. Here, the clinical significance of GGH and FPGS expression was investigated in Stage II/III gastric cancer patients undergoing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1.

Methods

Surgical specimens of cancer tissue and adjacent normal mucosa, obtained from 253 patients with previously untreated gastric cancer, were examined. GGH and FPGS mRNA expression was measured by qPCR to evaluate their clinicopathological significance in gastric cancer patients after curative resection.

Results

While FPGS expression showed no significant differences between the cancerous and normal samples, GGH expression was higher in cancer tissue than in adjacent normal mucosa. High GGH expression was correlated with age, histological type, and vascular invasion. Overall survival (OS) of patients with high GGH mRNA expression was significantly poorer than of patients with low GGH expression. Multivariate analysis showed that high GGH expression was an independent prognostic factor of OS (HR: 2.58, 95% CI 1.29–5.16). Patients who received S-1 adjuvant treatment showed a significantly poor OS between high GGH/low FPGS and low GGH/high FPGS. Patients without adjuvant treatment showed no significant difference.

Conclusion

GGH expression was significantly higher in gastric cancer tissue than in adjacent normal mucosa. High GGH and low FPGS expression is a useful independent predictor of poor outcomes in stage II/III gastric cancer patients undergoing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1.

Incorporation of Astragalus polysaccharides injection during concurrent chemoradiotherapy in advanced pharyngeal or laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: preliminary experience of a phase II double-blind, randomized trial

PURPOSE

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is one of the standard treatments for patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, CCRT may lead to decreased quality of life (QoL) and treatment compliance. This study aimed to determine the effects of PG2 (Astragalus polysaccharides) injection on CCRT-associated adverse events (AEs) and patients' compliance with the CCRT course.

METHODS

In this phase II double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, PG2 injection (sterile powder form) or placebo was administrated three times per week in parallel with CCRT to patients with HNSCC. The chemotherapy regimen included 50 mg/m² cisplatin every 2 weeks with daily tegafur-uracil (300 mg/m²) and leucovorin (60 mg/day).

RESULTS

The study was terminated prematurely due to the successful launch of a newly formulated PG2 injection (lyophilized form). A total of 17 patients were enrolled. The baseline demographics and therapeutic compliance were comparable between the CCRT/PG2 and CCRT/placebo groups. During CCRT, severe treatment-associated AEs were less frequent in the CCRT/PG2 group than in the CCRT/placebo group. Furthermore, less QoL fluctuations from the baseline during CCRT were noted in the CCRT/PG2 group than in the CCRT/placebo group, with a significant difference in the pain, appetite loss, and social eating behavior. The tumor response, disease-specific survival and overall survival did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study demonstrated PG2 injection exhibited an excellent safety profile, and has potential in ameliorating the deterioration in QoL and the AEs associated with active anticancer treatment among patients with advanced pharyngeal or laryngeal HNSCC under CCRT. Further research in patients with other cancer types or treatment modalities may widen PG2's application in clinical settings.

Timing and site-specific trends of recurrence in patients with pathological stage II or III gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 monotherapy

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant S-1 monotherapy prolongs the survival of patients with pathological stage II or III gastric cancer undergoing D2 gastrectomy. This therapeutic regimen is standard in Japan. Unfortunately, some patients who undergo this treatment suffer from recurrent disease. However, information regarding the timing and site-specific trends of recurrence is insufficient.

METHODS

Among 396 patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 monotherapy between 2008 and 2012, 122 experienced a recurrence. We retrospectively determined the timing and sites of recurrence.

RESULTS

The median RFS of the 122 patients was 19.5 months, and their 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 67.2%, 23.0% and 5.7%, respectively. There were no significant differences in RFS among disease substages. Local recurrence, lymph node involvement and peritoneal and hematogenous metastases were found in 6, 25, 63 and 42 patients, respectively. Approximately 10% of patients presented with contemporaneous sites of recurrence. Local recurrence and lymph node metastasis plateaued 3 years after gastrectomy. Peritoneal and hematogenous metastasis increased within 5 years after surgery. In patients with hematogenous metastasis, the number of liver metastases plateaued but increased in others.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with recurrent disease who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 monotherapy, 80% of recurrences occur within 3 years after gastrectomy. The timing of recurrence is not significantly different among substages. Although the rates of local recurrence and lymph node and liver metastasis plateau after 3 years, peritoneal and the other hematogenous metastases increase within 5 years.

The efficacy and feasibility of adopting intravenous chemotherapy and oral S-1 as a sequential therapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients

Some postoperative gastric cancer patients have to terminate systemic intravenous chemotherapy early due to adverse drug reactions. We performed a retrospective study to explore the efficacy and feasibility of sequential therapy.We retrospectively analyzed 55 postoperative gastric cancer patients (Group A) who received sequential therapy (intravenous chemotherapy and S-1) and 53 patients (Group B) who received intravenous chemotherapy from January 2012 to December 2013 in our hospital. The therapeutic effect (including 1-year, 5-year tumor recurrence and survival rate) and the incidence of adverse reactions were analyzed.When death and survival for more than 5 years was regarded as the end point of follow-up, the mean follow-up period was 40.6 months (34.7-46.4) in Group A and 39.2 months (33.0-45.3) in Group B. The 1-year tumor recurrence after the operation was 23.6% (13/55, Group A) and 28.3% (15/53, Group B). The 5-year tumor recurrence was 45.5% (25/55, Group A) and 49.1% (26/53, Group B). There was no significant difference in the 1- and 5-year tumor recurrence rates between these two groups (P > .05). The 1-year survival rates of Group A and Group B were 81.8% (45/55) and 79.2% (42/53), respectively, and the 5-year survival rates of Group A and Group B were 47.3% (26/55) and 45.3% (24/53), respectively. No significant difference was observed between these two treatments at either the 1- or 5-year survival benefit (P > .05). However, the patients in Group A had a lower incidence of gastrointestinal reactions (such as nausea and vomiting), leukopenia and liver function damage (P < .05). We also found that patients who underwent sequential therapy might show lower levels of adverse reactions.Our retrospective study provided some evidence to suggest that sequential treatment is effective and safe for postoperative gastric cancer patients who are intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy.

Tegafur and 5-fluorouracil levels in tears and changes in tear volume in long-term users of the oral anticancer drug S-1

Eye problems are an adverse reaction sometimes found in chemotherapy. Although not life-threatening, they can reduce patients' quality of life. The highest incidence of eye problems is reported for the combination anticancer drug S-1 (tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil), and methods to prevent or treat the eye problems caused by this drug are presently lacking. To determine early detection methods and treatment for adverse ocular reactions, we measured changes in tear volume and levels of tegafur (FT) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), an active metabolite of FT, in the tears of patients with long-term use of S-1. A total of 11 patients receiving S-1 monotherapy as adjuvant chemotherapy after gastric cancer surgery were included. Tear volume and FT and 5-FU levels in tears were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry during a maximum of 8 treatment cycles (48 weeks). For analysis, patients were divided into two groups: "watering eyes" (n=6, complaints of watering eyes at least once during the treatment period) and "no watering eyes" (n=5, no complaints of watering eyes). Both groups exhibited increased FT and 5-FU levels in tears upon initiation of S-1 treatment, and levels rapidly decreased upon discontinuation. Our findings suggest a relationship between FT level in tears and tear volume in patients with long-term S-1 use. The symptom of watering eyes may thus be linked to FT level in tears.

Collagen gel droplet-embedded culture drug sensitivity test (CD-DST) predicts the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of collagen gel droplet-embedded culture drug sensitivity tests (CD-DSTs) in predicting the efficacy of adjuvant chemo-therapeutic treatments for pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

The clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of 22 PC patients who underwent CD-DST after pancreatectomy at Tohoku University between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Eligibility criteria were resectable or borderline resectable PC, successful evaluation for 5-fluorouracil sensitivity by CD-DST, treatment with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy, and no preoperative chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The rate of successful evaluation by CD-DST was 52.3% in PC. The optimal T/C ratio, defined as the ratio of the number of cancer cells in the treatment group (T) to that in the control group (C), for 5-fluorouracil was 85% using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The sensitive group (T/C ratio < 85%; n = 11) had a better recurrence-free survival rate than the resistant group (T/C ratio ≥ 85%; n = 11; P = 0.029). A Cox proportional hazards regression model demonstrated that sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil was an independent predictor of recurrence on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 3.28; 95.0% CI 1.20-9.84; P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

CD-DSTs helped to predict PC recurrence after S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

Effect of Chemotherapy on Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Body Composition Precision Error in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Precision error in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is defined as difference in results due to instrumental and technical factors given no biologic change. The aim of this study is to compare precision error in DXA body composition scans in head and neck cancer patients before and 2 months after chemotherapy.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 34 male head and neck cancer patients with normal body mass index (BMI) were prospectively enrolled and all patients received 2 consecutive DXA scans both before and after 2 months of chemotherapy for a total of 4 scans. The precision error of 3 DXA body composition values (lean mass, fat mass, and bone mineral content) was calculated for total body and 5 body regions (arms, legs, trunk, android, and gynoid). Precision errors before and after treatment were compared using generalized estimating equation model.

RESULTS

There was no significant change in precision error for the DXA total body composition values following chemotherapy; lean mass (0.33%-0.40%, p = 0.179), total fat mass (1.39%-1.70%, p = 0.259) and total bone mineral content (0.42%-0.56%, p = 0.243). However, there were significant changes in regional precision error; trunk lean mass (1.19%-1.77%, p = 0.014) and android fat mass (2.17%-3.72%, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

For head and neck cancer patients, precision error of DXA total body composition values did not change significantly following chemotherapy; however, there were significant changes in fat mass in the android and lean mass in the trunk. Caution should be exercised when interpreting longitudinal DXA body composition data in those body parts.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of S-1 and capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of S-1 and capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC).

METHODS

Eligible prospective clinical trials were searched and available data were extracted. Odds ratio and hazard ratio of available outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were pooled for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies including 828 patients were included. The results of pooled analysis showed no statistical difference in short-term efficacy including ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-1.19; P = .48) or DCR (95% CI: 0.65-1.29; P = .61), or long-term efficacy including PFS (95% CI: 0.75-1.08; P = .26) or OS (95% CI: 0.78-1.13; P = .50). Symptoms of diarrhea at any grade were more prevalent (95% CI: 1.21-2.29; P = .002) in patients treated with S-1, while hand-foot syndrome (HFS) at any grade (95% CI: 0.24-0.48; P < .0001) or high grade (95% CI: 0.09-0.48; P < .0001) was more frequent in capecitabine group. AEs including leucopenia, neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, vomiting, oral mucositis, stomatitis, elevated alanine transaminase, or peripheral neuropathy showed no statistical difference between S-1 and capecitabine group (all P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis reveals that S-1 has comparable efficacy, lower risk of HFS and higher incidence of diarrhea compared to capecitabine for treatment in patients with mCRC.

A comprehensive evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety of celecoxib in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic or postoperative recurrent gastric cancer patients: A preliminary, three-center, clinical trial study

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of celecoxib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic or postoperative recurrent gastric cancer.

METHODS

This preliminary, three-center, clinical trial study was conducted between September 2010 and December 2016. In the experimental group (n = 100), patients were treated with celecoxib combined with chemotherapy, and chemotherapy alone was used in the control group. Progression-free survival (PFS) was considered as the primary efficacy parameter. Overall survival (OS), remission rate (RR), quality of life (QOL) and drug safety were considered as the secondary efficacy parameters.

RESULTS

The PFS of the experimental group was 6 months, which was not significantly longer than that of the control group (5 months, P = .73). The average OS was not significantly different between the experimental group (12 months) and the control group (10 months, P = .59). The average OS of the COX-2 positive patients in the experimental group was 14 months and it was significantly longer than the 10-month OS in the control group (P = .01). The PFS of the COX-2 positive patients in the experimental group was 7.5 months, significantly longer than the 5-month PFS of patients in the control group (P < .001). No statistical significance was identified in the incidence of nausea, neutropenia, anorexia, peripheral neurotoxicity, diarrhea, vomiting, asthenia and thrombocytopenia. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire revealed that the overall QOL of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < .05). No statistical significance was found in the scores of functioning scale between the 2 groups. However, the scores of the symptom scale, especially for pain and fatigue in the experimental group was remarkably higher than that in the control group (P < .05). The overall score of EORTC QLQ-STO22 for the experimental group was considerably higher compared to that for the control group (P < .05). No statistical significance was identified in term of the domains of restrictions on feeding, dysphagia, anxiety, reflux, sense of taste, dry mouth, hair loss and body shape between the 2 groups (P > .05 for all mentioned outcomes).

CONCLUSION

Celecoxib combined with chemotherapy offers more clinical benefits for COX-2 positive advanced gastric cancer patients.

A phase II study of biweekly oxaliplatin plus S-1 combination chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer in China

Oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) was a first-line regimen for advanced gastric cancer. The continuous administration of S-1 for 3 weeks can result in unacceptable gastrointestinal and hematological toxicities. Therefore, an alternative regimen (administration of S-1 for 1-week followed by 1-week rest) is warrant for improved tolerability and noninferiority efficacy. We conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biweekly SOX as the first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer in China.Patients with metastatic or previously untreated advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously at a dose of 85 mg/m on day 1, while S-1 was administered orally in doses of 80, 100, or 120 mg/day depending on different body surface areas of <1.25 m, 1.25-1.5 m, or >1.5 m respectively; the total dose of S-1 was administered twice daily on days 1-7 followed by a 7-day rest. This schedule was repeated every 2 weeks until disease progressed or intolerable toxicity occurred.Forty-six patients (M/F = 33/13) received biweekly oxaliplatin and S-1 as first-line chemotherapy. A total of 257 treatment cycles were administered and the median number of cycles administered was 6. Thirty-six patients (78.3%) received second-line chemotherapy. The median progression free survival and median overall survival was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.37-5.36 months) and 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.88-11.3 months), respectively. The 1-year and 2-year survival rate was 41% and 13%. The objective response rate was 30.43%, and the disease control rate was 76.08%. The observed adverse events of Grade 3/4 included were leukocytopenia (13.04%); anemia (13.04%); neutropenia (15.22%); neurological toxicity (2.17%); diarrhea (2.17%).The biweekly SOX regimen as first-line treatment was active and well tolerated in Chinese patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer.

Efficacy of subsequent docetaxel +/- ramucirumab and S-1 after nivolumab for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Cytotoxic chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as second-line or subsequent treatment generally results in a poor treatment outcome. Several reports have indicated that subsequent cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients who have received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might have relatively better efficacy.

METHODS

The clinical data of advanced NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab during clinical practice at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 17 December 2015 and 31 August 2017 were consecutively reviewed, and the treatment outcomes of docetaxel-based chemotherapy (docetaxel +/- ramucirumab) or S-1 after nivolumab were analyzed. The results were then compared with those of advanced NSCLC patients treated with docetaxel or S-1 but not ICIs during clinical practice between 17 December 2014 and 16 December 2015.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were administered docetaxel-based chemotherapy and 21 patients were administered S-1 in any line after nivolumab. Twenty-four patients were administered docetaxel-based chemotherapy and 15 patients were administered S-1 immediately after nivolumab. Sixty-six patients were administered docetaxel and 23 patients were administered S-1 without ICIs. The objective response rate, disease control rate, and median progression-free survival duration were 28.6%, 53.6%, and 5.26 months for patients receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy or S-1 immediately after nivolumab treatment; 24.3%, 51.4%, and 3.88 months for patients receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy or S-1 in any line after nivolumab; and 16.4%, 56.7%, and 2.74 months, for patients receiving docetaxel or S-1 without ICIs, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Subsequent cytotoxic chemotherapy, especially immediately after nivolumab, has better treatment efficacy than that of regimens without ICI pretreatment.

Phase II Study of S-1 and Paclitaxel Combination Therapy in Patients with Previously Treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lessons Learned.

In terms of efficacy and safety, good results were obtained with S‐1 and paclitaxel (PTX) combination therapy.

The findings suggest that S‐1 and PTX combination therapy is a feasible treatment option in patients with previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer.

Background.

Although monotherapy with cytotoxic agents, including docetaxel and pemetrexed, is recommended for patients with previously treated advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its outcomes are unsatisfactory. S‐1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine agent that consists of tegafur, 5‐ chloro‐2, 4‐dihydroxypyridine, and potassium oxonate. S‐1 is approved for patients with gastric cancer in 7 Asian countries and 15 European countries. It is also approved for patients with eight type of cancers, including NSCLC, in Japan. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of S‐1 and paclitaxel (PTX) combination therapy in patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Methods.

Oral S‐1 was administered thrice weekly on days 1–14 at 80, 100, and 120 mg/day in patients with body surface areas of <1.25, 1.25–1.5, and >1.5 m², respectively. PTX was administered at 80 mg/m² on days 1 and 8. Primary endpoint was response rate, and secondary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results.

Forty patients were enrolled, with response and disease control rates of 27.5% and 75.0%, respectively (Fig. 1). Median PFS and OS were 6.5 and 20.7 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia were seen in five (12%) and one (2%) patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred in three patients (7%). Common grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicities were stomatitis (5% of patients), diarrhea (7% of patients), and interstitial lung disease (one patient). No treatment‐related deaths were observed.

Conclusion.

This S‐1 and PTX cotherapy dose and schedule showed satisfactory efficacy, with mild toxicities, in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC.

A multicenter phase III study comparing Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) radiotherapy concurrent and consolidated with S-1 versus SIB alone in elderly patients with esophageal and esophagogastric cancer - the 3JECROG P-01 study protocol

BACKGROUND

The importance of definitive radiotherapy for elderly patients with esophageal and esophagogastric-junction cancer is pronounced. However, little is known in terms of the best way to combine radiotherapy with other treatment options. This study aims to compare the efficiency of SIB radiotherapy alone with SIB radiotherapy concurrent and consolidated with S-1 for elderly patients. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is also incorporated in the procedure of treatment.

METHODS/DESIGN

The study is a two arm, open, randomized multicenter Phase III trial with patients over 70 years old with stage IIA-IVB (UICC 2002, IVB only with metastasis to supraclavicular or celiac lymph nodes) squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. A total of 300 patients will be randomized using a 1:1 allocation ratio stratified by disease stage and study site. Patients allocated to the SIB arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy (95%PTV/PGTV 50.4Gy/59.92Gy/28f) while those randomized to SIB + S-1 arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy concurrent and consolidated with S-1. The primary endpoint of the trial is 1-year overall survival. Secondary objectives include progression-free survival, recurrence-free survival (local-regional and distant), disease failure pattern, toxicity profile as well as quality of life. Besides, detailed radiotherapy protocol and quality assurance procedure have been incorporated into this trial.

DISCUSSION

The proportion of elderly patients in esophageal cancer is now growing, but there is a lack of evidence in term of treatment standard for this group of patients, which is what we aim to obtain through this prospective phase III study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov NCT02979691 . Registered November 22, 2016.

Unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Role of CT quantitative imaging biomarkers for predicting outcomes of patients treated with chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study was to determine if computed tomographic (CT) texture analysis measurements of the tumor are independently associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), including both unresectable locally advanced and metastatic PDAC, who were treated with chemotherapy.

METHODS

After an institutional review board waiver was obtained, contrast material-enhanced CT studies in 41 patients with unresectable PDAC who underwent contrast-enhanced CT before chemotherapy between 2014 and 2017 were analyzed in terms of tumor texture, with quantification of mean gray-level intensity (Mean), entropy, mean of positive pixels (MPP), kurtosis, standard deviation (SD), and skewness for fine to coarse textures (spatial scaling factor (SSF) 0-6, respectively). The association between pretreatment and posttreatment texture parameters, as well as Δ value (difference between posttreatment and pretreatment texture parameters), and survival time was assessed by using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Findings from the multivariate Cox model indicated that tumor size, tumor SD (HR, 0.942; 95% CI: 0.898, 0.988) and skewness (HR, 0.407; 95% CI: 0.172, 0.962) measurements with SSF = 3, and tumor SD (HR, 0.958; 95% CI: 0.92, 0.997) measurements with SSF = 4 were significantly and independently associated with PFS, while tumor size and tumor SD (HR, 0.928; 95% CI: 0.882, 0.976) measurements with SSF = 3 were significantly and independently associated with OS. None of the post-therapy texture parameters or Δ value had a significant association with OS or PFS in multivariate Cox regression models. Medium SD (SSF = 3) of more than 38.38 and coarse SD (SSF = 4) of more than 40.67 were associated with longer PFS after chemotherapy (for SSF = 3, median PFS was 10.0 vs 6.0 months [P = 0.024], and for SSF = 4, median PFS was 12.0 vs 6.0 months [P = 0.003]). SD of 38.38 or greater (SSF = 3) as a dichotomized variable was a significant positive prognostic factor for OS (median OS, 20.0 vs 9.0 months [P = 0.04]). Survival models that included a combination of pretreatment SD (SSF = 3) with tumor size, had the potential to perform better than SD alone, while having no statistical significance in this study (area under the ROC curve, 0.756 vs 0.715 [P = 0.066]).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment CT quantitative imaging biomarkers from texture analysis are associated with PFS and OS in patients with unresectable PDAC who were treated with chemotherapy, and the combination of pretreatment texture parameters and tumor size have the potential to perform better in survival models than imaging biomarker alone.

Phase II Study of S-1 plus Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Esophageal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) need safer and more efficacious treatments. The aim of this phase II study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in metastatic ESCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

50 patients with metastatic ESCC who had not received prior systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease were enrolled. Patients received S-1 at 40 mg/m2 divided into 2 daily doses for 14 days and cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 on day 1 or 25 mg/m2 on days 1-3 intravenously, repeated every 21 days with a maximum of 6 cycles.

RESULTS

47 patients were assessable for response and 18 patients achieved a partial response, giving an overall response rate of 38.3%. Among those who had objective responses, a large percentage (72.2%) quickly showed remarkable tumor shrinkage during the first 2 cycles. 18 (38.3%) patients had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 5.6 months, and the median overall survival was 12.0 months. Toxicity was mild to moderate and generally tolerable.

CONCLUSION

The combination of S-1 plus cisplatin was a well-tolerated and convenient chemotherapy regimen with promising efficacy.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with S-1/capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, advanced, or recurrent gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: interim results of a randomized, phase II trial (ATTRACTION-4)

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab is approved as an option for third- or later-line treatment of advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer in several countries after ATTRACTION-2. To further improve the therapeutic efficacy of first-line therapy, exploration of a nivolumab-chemotherapy combination is warranted. In part 1 (phase II) of ATTRACTION-4, the safety and efficacy of nivolumab combined with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) as first-line therapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative G/GEJ cancer were evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive nivolumab (360 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) plus SOX (S-1, 40 mg/m2 orally twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days off; oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks) or CapeOX (capecitabine, 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days off; oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal.

RESULTS

Of 40 randomized patients, 39 (nivolumab plus SOX, 21; nivolumab plus CapeOX, 18) and 38 (21 and 17, respectively) comprised the safety and efficacy populations, respectively. Most frequent (>10%) grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (14.3%) in the nivolumab plus SOX group, and neutropenia (16.7%), anemia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, decreased appetite, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and nausea (11.1% each) in the nivolumab plus CapeOX group. No treatment-related death occurred. Objective response rate was 57.1% (95% confidence interval 34.0-78.2) with nivolumab plus SOX and 76.5% (50.1-93.2) with nivolumab plus CapeOX. Median overall survival was not reached (NR) in both groups. Median progression-free survival was 9.7 months (5.8-NR) and 10.6 months (5.6-12.5), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab combined with SOX/CapeOX was well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging efficacy for unresectable advanced or recurrent HER2-negative G/GEJ cancer. ATTRACTION-4 has proceeded to part 2 (phase III) to compare nivolumab plus SOX/CapeOX versus placebo plus SOX/CapeOX.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID

NCT02746796.

Dynamics of blood neutrophil-related indices during nivolumab treatment may be associated with response to salvage chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: A hypothesis-generating study

Several recent studies have shown that salvage chemotherapy following PD-1 blockade produces high antitumor activity in some patients with non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the underlying synergistic mechanisms remain uncertain. The blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) can reflect the number of circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells and tumor-associated neutrophils. The immunosuppressive status of the tumor microenvironment could be monitored by the time-series patterns of NLR and ANC. The dynamics of NLR and ANC during nivolumab treatment were retrospectively explored in 15 patients: 8 patients receiving subsequent salvage chemotherapy (2 groups: 3 non-responders and 5 responders), and 7 responders to nivolumab alone (2 groups: 4 partial response and 3 complete response). The dynamics of NLR and ANC during nivolumab differed among these four groups (NLR P = 0.045, ANC P = 0.067). NLR and ANC during nivolumab treatment increased over time in non-responders to salvage chemotherapy, with an inverse relationship between drug response and NLR or ANC at four to six weeks among the four groups. We hypothesize that the early dynamics of NLR and ANC during nivolumab may be associated with the late efficacy of subsequent salvage chemotherapy. Further studies involving a large cohort are needed to confirm these findings, which could provide insight into the role of myeloid immunosuppressor cells in combination PD-1 blockade and chemotherapy.

Phase II Study of the Triple Combination Chemotherapy of SOXIRI (S-1/Oxaliplatin/Irinotecan) in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

LESSONS LEARNED

The triple combination chemotherapy of SOXIRI (S-1/oxaliplatin/irinotecan) in patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was an effective treatment that appeared to be better tolerated than the widely used FOLFIRINOX regimen.SOXIRI regimen may provide an alternative approach for advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND

In our previous phase I study, we determined the recommended dose of a biweekly S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (SOXIRI) regimen in patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This phase II study was conducted to assess the safety and clinical efficacy in patients with unresectable PDAC.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated metastatic and locally advanced PDAC were enrolled. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints were adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Patients received 80 mg/m² of S-1 twice a day for 2 weeks in alternate-day administration, 150 mg/m² of irinotecan on day 1, and 85 mg/m² of oxaliplatin on day 1 of a 2-week cycle.

RESULTS

Thirty-five enrolled patients received a median of six (range: 2-15) treatment cycles. The RR was 22.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.4-40.1); median OS, 17.7 months (95% CI: 9.8-22.0); and median PFS, 7.4 months (95% CI: 4.2-8.4). Furthermore, the median OS in patients with distant metastasis was 10.1 months, whereas that in patients with locally advanced PDAC was 22.6 months. Major grade 3 or 4 toxicity included neutropenia (54%), anemia (17%), febrile neutropenia (11%), anorexia (9%), diarrhea (9%), and nausea (9%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

SOXIRI is considered a promising and well-tolerated regimen in patients with unresectable PDAC.

Apatinib and S-1 combination therapy for the treatment of advanced head and neck neoplasms: Three case reports

Apatinib, one of the novel oral antiangiogenic agents, shows survival benefits in treating advanced or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. However, its efficacy in treating advanced head and neck neoplasms has not been reported. Herein, three elderly men with advanced head and neck neoplasms were treated with apatinib and S-1. Their initial diagnoses were hypopharyngeal carcinoma, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck, and squamous cell carcinoma of the pyriform sinus. All patients underwent repeated chemotherapy but developed disease progression. As they refused radiotherapy due to its serious adverse reaction, apatinib was administered at a dose of 425 mg daily and S-1 at 60 mg twice daily. Thirty days after apatinib administration, the patients achieved partial response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 standard. Mild toxicity or drug-related side effect was observed during the treatment. Therefore, apatinib and S-1 could be the new treatment option for advanced head and neck neoplasms. However, clinical trials are required to confirm their efficacy and safety.

[A Comparative Study on Feasibility of SOX Therapy and SP Therapy with Short Hydration for Gastric Cancer in the Outpatient Setting]

We conducted a retrospective comparative study on feasibility of S-1/oxaliplatin(SOX)therapy and S-1/cisplatin therapy with short hydration(SP-SH)for gastric cancer in the outpatient setting. The subjects were patients with gastric cancer aged younger than 75 years who underwent SOX or SP-SH therapy at our hospital. There were 22 patients in the SOX group and 30 patients in the SP-SH group. Both the groups received the first course during hospitalization and then received the subsequent courses in the outpatient section. Evaluation items for each therapy included the treatment rate in the outpatient setting, number of re-hospitalization cases, relative dose intensity(RDI), and adverse events. The treatment rate in the outpatient setting was 100%(22/22)in the SOX group and 96%in the SP-SH group(26/27). Re-hospitalization cases included 1 case of loss of appetite in the SOX group and 1 cases of loss of appetite and 2 cases of febrile neutropenia(FN)in the SP-SH group. The median values of the RDI were 86% with S-1 and 85% with oxaliplatin in the SOX group and 92% with S-1 and 80% with cisplatin in the SP-SH group. The SP-SH group had a higher proportion of neutropenia cases of Grade 3 or higher(SP-SH 33% v. s SOX 5%, p=0.012). The SOX group showed a higher proportion of loss of appetite cases for all the Grades(SOX 86% v. s SP-SH 50%, p=0.007)and peripheral neuropathy cases(SOX 64% v. s SP-SH 23%, p=0.003). It was considered that SOX and SP-SH therapies can be treated in the outpatient section, although the occurrence of loss of appetite and FN must be considered.

[A Case Report of Luminal A Male Inflammatory Breast Cancer that Was Difficult to Treat Because of Trousseau Syndrome]

This report describes the case of a 67-year-old male with inflammatory breast cancer. He had noticed a left breast mass about seven years previously, but he had ignored it. He then visited our hospital 4 months previously when multiple small masses occurred in the left front chest wall. The tumor was diagnosed as skin metastasis of breast cancer by skin biopsy and he was referred to our department. The tumor cells were positive for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, and negative for HER2/neu, and the Ki67 expression was 10-15%. The subtype of his breast cancer was luminal A type. It had secondary inflammatory breast cancer and preceded chemotherapy. Also, as the veins in the lower extremity were filled with thrombus, we gave him an anticoagulant (Edoxaban), but due to the malignant hyper coagulable state (Trousseau syndrome) a CV port could not be implanted. 3 courses of docetaxel every 3 weeks failed to control the disease. Since an obstruction of the right iliac artery was newly observed, the anticoagulant was changed to cilostazol and rivaroxaban, but left second finger and fourth finger necrosis occurred due to peripheral circulatory failure. The condition of the disease was stabilized by FEC (5-FU, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) therapy, but it became difficult to secure the blood vessel. Without constructing a CV port because of the thrombus, chemotherapy was changed to S-1 oral administration, and strength to the chest wall Modulated radiotherapy intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was performed. Although the tumor was reduced, the condition of the whole body gradually weakened and the patient died a year and a half after the start of the treatment. This case of inflammatory luminal in male breast cancer that caused thrombus was difficult to treat. Thrombosis in advanced cancer patients is often pointed out, but since male breast cancer patients tend to take a long time to visit the hospital after becoming aware of the mass and arrive at an advanced state, it is necessary to notify the public of the existence of male breast cancer.

Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of a randomized phase III study of first-line S-1 plus oxaliplatin vs. S-1 plus cisplatin

BACKGROUND

We investigated early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) using data from the G-SOX study comparing S-1 plus oxaliplatin with S-1 plus cisplatin as the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

ETS was determined as % decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions at the first evaluation of week 6 compared to baseline. DpR was the maximum % shrinkage during the study treatment. The impact of ETS (cutoff value 20%) and DpR (continuous value) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis including prognostic factors obtained in the G-SOX study; ECOG performance status, baseline sum of tumor diameters, disease status (recurrent/unresectable), and histology (diffuse/intestinal).

RESULTS

Among 685 patients enrolled in the G-SOX study, 632 patients who had the first tumor evaluation were analyzed. Patients with ETS ≥ 20% had longer PFS (median 4.5 vs. 2.8 months, p < 0.0001) and OS (median 14.8 vs. 10.5 months, p < 0.0001) than those with ETS < 20%. Adjusted hazard ratios of ETS < 20 vs. ≥ 20% were 0.606 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.506-0.725) for PFS and 0.589 (95% CI 0.492-0.704) for OS. DpR was also significantly associated with PFS and OS (both p < 0.0001). These results were similar between the SOX and CS groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In AGC patients receiving the first-line therapy, ETS and DpR might be predictors for PFS and OS.

Short-term efficacy of oral low-dose Tegafur chemotherapy after transarterial chemoembolization in primary hepatic carcinoma

PURPOSE

To observe the short-term efficacy of oral low-dose Tegafur chemotherapy after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC).

METHODS

120 PHC patients undergoing TACE treatment for the first were randomly divided into the Tegafur group and the TACE group. Patients in TACE group received TACE only, whereas those in the Tegafur group received TACE and postoperative oral low-dose Tegafur chemotherapy. All patients were followed up for 4 to 20 months. Clinical efficacy, liver function changes, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The disease control rate (DCR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of the Tegafur group were significantly higher than those of TACE group (p<0.05). Moreover, higher PFS was found in the Tegafur group than that of the TACE group after 18 months of follow-up (p<0.05). Before treatment, serum levels of ALT, AST, TBIL and DBIL in the two groups were not statistically significant (p>0.05). After treatment, the above-mentioned indicators were remarkably increased in both groups. In particular, the indicators were lower in the Tegafur group than those of the TACE group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TACE combined with low-dose Tegafur for treating PHC can slow down the tumor progression and prolong the PFS. This approach is safe and effective.