A randomized phase III trial of postoperative surveillance for pathological stage II and IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG2012, PHOENIX)

The goal of postoperative surveillance following non-small cell lung cancer surgery is to detect recurrence and second primary malignancies while curative treatment is still possible. Although several guidelines recommend that patients have computed tomography (CT) scans every 6 months for the first 2 years after resection, then once a year, there is no evidence that it is effective for survival, especially in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In October 2022, we launched a multi-institutional, randomized controlled phase III trial for pathological stage II and IIIA non-small cell lung cancer patients to confirm the non-inferiority of less intensive surveillance with less frequent CT scans versus standard surveillance in terms of overall survival. The primary endpoint is overall survival. We intend to enroll 1100 patients from 45 institutions over 4 years. The trial has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials under the code jRCT1030220361 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT1030220361).

Analyzing the risk factors for disease progression within 2 years and histological transformation in patients treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone as first-line treatment: A 15-year follow-up of patients with advanced follicular lymphoma in JCOG0203

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent lymphoma that becomes aggressive due to histological transformation (HT), leading to reduced survival. Patients with FL have different clinical courses and various treatment options. Some patients exhibit shorter survival and experience disease progression within 24 months of diagnosis/treatment (POD24); the optimal treatment remains an unmet needs. Thus, identifying factors that predict shorter survival is essential to stratify treatment and prolong the survival of patients with FL. To analyze risk factors for POD24 and HT in patients treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) as first-line treatment, we performed this post-hoc analysis of patients with advanced indolent B-cell lymphoma in a randomized clinical trial wherein six cycles of R-CHOP were administered every 2-3 weeks. The primary analysis showed no differences in outcomes, which enabled the analysis of 248 patients with FL, assigned to two arms. All histopathological specimens from the 300 enrolled patients were reviewed by three expert hematopathologists. Multivariable analysis implicated Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) intermediate (odds ratio [OR] 2.531, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.676-9.466) and high- (OR 2.236, 95% CI 0.160-31.226) risks, B symptoms (OR 2.091, 95% CI 0.747-5.851), and grade 3A (G3A) (OR 1.833, 95% CI 0.634-5.299) as risk factors for POD24. Furthermore, multivariable analysis through a median follow-up of 15.9 years implicated G3A (OR 2.628, 95% CI 0.806-8.575) and high-risk FLIPI (OR 4.401, 95% CI 0.186-104.377) as risk factors for HT. However, an analysis limited to the first 10 years revealed that the prognostic factors elucidated from the longer-term analysis had a greater impact on HT. G3A and high-risk FLIPI may independently predict POD24 and HT, thereby informing treatment stratification of patients with untreated advanced-stage FL in future trials, particularly to address the unmet needs of patients with POD24.

Ten-year follow-up outcomes of limited resection trial for radiologically less-invasive lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The JCOG0804/WJOG4507L single-arm confirmatory trial indicated a satisfactory 10-year prognosis for patients who underwent limited resection for radiologically less-invasive lung cancer. However, only one prospective trial has reported a 10-year prognosis.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter prospective study coordinated by the National Cancer Center Hospital East and Kanagawa Cancer Center. We analyzed the long-term prognosis of 100 patients who underwent limited resection of a radiologically less-invasive lung cancer in the peripheral lung field. We defined radiologically less-invasive lung cancer as lung adenocarcinoma with a maximum tumor diameter of ≤2 cm, tumor disappearance ratio of ≥0.5 and cN0. The primary endpoint was the 10-year local recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

Our patients, with a median age of 62 years, included 39 males. A total of 58 patients were non-smokers; 87 had undergone wide wedge resection and 9 underwent segmentectomy. A total of four cases were converted to lobectomy because of the presence of poorly differentiated components in the frozen specimen or insufficient margin with segmentectomy. The median follow-up duration was 120.9 months. The 10-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates of patients with lung cancer were both 96.0%. Following the 10-year long-term follow-up, two patients experienced recurrences at resection ends after wedge resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited resection imparted a satisfactory prognosis for patients with radiologically less-invasive lung cancer, except two cases of local recurrence >5 years after surgery. These findings suggest that patients with this condition who underwent limited resection may require continued follow-up >5 years after surgery.

Long-term outcomes of 5-year survivors without recurrence after the complete resection of non-small cell lung cancer after lobectomy: a landmark analysis in consideration of competing risks

PURPOSE

Among non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), 5 years is a benchmark in cancer control and treatment, but a certain percentage of cases recur after 5 years. The long-term post-recurrence outcomes remain controversial. To examine the accurate prognostic factors associated with survival and cancer recurrence among 5-year survivors, a landmark analysis that considered competing risks was performed.

METHODS

Complete resection of NSCLC was performed in 2482 patients between January 2003 and December 2015. A total of 1431 patients were 5-year survivors without recurrence. A landmark time analysis was applied to the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) from 5 years after surgery, and the findings were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cumulative incidence of cause-specific death and recurrence was estimated using the cumulative incidence function, while carefully considering the competing risks.

RESULTS

Postoperative recurrence was detected in 732 patients, of whom 68 (9.3%) had recurrence after 5 years. The median follow-up period was 8.2 years. In the competing risk analysis, the independent poor prognostic factors associated with cause-specific death were age ≥ 75 years, lymph node metastasis and pleural invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients requiring a follow-up for > 5 years were aged ≥ 75 years and had either lymph node metastasis or pleural invasion.

A Retrospective Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Refractory to Gemcitabine Monotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX), termed GnP, which is limited, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) who show good tolerance to GEM monotherapy prior to being refractory to it.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with locally advanced or metastatic PC who received GEM followed by GnP between December 2014 and March 2019, regardless of the treatment line.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients who received GnP after becoming refractory to GEM were included in this study. Eight patients were included in the nab-PTX-naïve group, seven of whom were treated with GEM monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy, and one was refractory to GEM monotherapy after modified FOLFIRINOX treatment. The other six patients were included in the nab-PTX reintroduction group. In this group, all patients received GnP followed by GEM maintenance therapy to prevent adverse events, such as peripheral neuropathy and fatigue. Two patients in the nab-PTX-naïve group showed partial response and none in the reintroduction group; median progression-free survival was 7.6 and 1.4 months and median overall survival was 9.4 and 6.2 months, respectively. In the safety analysis, grade 3 anemia and peripheral neuropathy were observed in one patient in the nab-PTX reintroduction group, while the remaining adverse events were of grade 1 or 2.

CONCLUSION

GnP is safe and effective even in patients with GEM-refractory PC, and GEM treatment followed by GnP can be an effective treatment option for patients with nab-PTX-naïve PC.

EGFR mutation impacts recurrence in high-risk early-stage lung adenocarcinoma in the IASLC grading system

INTRODUCTION

The developments of perioperative treatments for patients with high-risk early-stage lung cancer are ongoing, however, real-world data and evidence of clinical significance of genetic aberration are lacking in this population. This study aimed to identify patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma at high risk for recurrence based on pathological indicators of poor prognosis, including the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) grade, and elucidate the prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) status.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 494 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection for pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma between 2011 and 2016. The patients were evaluated for EGFRm and IASLC grade. Multivariable analysis was used to identify pathological factors for poor prognosis associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with any one of these factors were classified into the high-risk group. The prognostic impact of EGFRm was evaluated using RFS, OS, and cumulative recurrence proportion.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis for RFS and OS revealed that IASLC grade 3, pathological invasion size>2 cm, and presence of lymphovascular invasion were indicators of poor prognosis. EGFRm-positive patients had a higher incidence of all types of recurrence, including central nervous system (CNS) metastasis and distant metastasis in high-risk group, but not in low-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that patients with EGFRm-positive stage I lung adenocarcinoma in the high-risk group have an increased risk of recurrence, including CNS metastasis. These findings highlight the need for development of adjuvant treatment in this population.

Prospective multicenter trial of the cryoballoon ablation system for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on the post-endoscopic resection scar. A CRYO-SCAR study (EPOC1902)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic resection (ER) is a minimally invasive treatment for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). Post-ER scars complicate en bloc resection, even with advanced techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection. The cryoballoon ablation system (CBAS) effectively manages Barrett's esophagus but has limited evidence in SESCC treatment, particularly on post-ER scars. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the CBAS for treating SESCC on post-ER scars.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted at two tertiary referral centers in Japan in patients endoscopically diagnosed with T1a SESCC on the post-ER scar. Focal CBAS was used for cryoablation, with specific criteria for lesion selection and treatment method. The primary endpoint was local complete response (L-CR) rate of the primary lesion 48 weeks after the first cryoablation as evaluated by an independent central evaluation committee.

RESULTS

From October 2020 to October 2021, 15 patients with 17 lesions underwent cryoablation, with two requiring repeat cryoablation. The L-CR rate for primary and all lesions evaluated by the central evaluation committee was 100%. The endoscopist's evaluation was consistent with these results. The median procedure time was 9 min. Eight patients experienced no pain, and the highest pain score reported on a numeric 1-10 rating scale was 3. The technical success rate was 94.7% (18/19). Throughout the median follow-up period of 14.3 months, recurrences, deaths, or severe treatment-related adverse events were not reported.

CONCLUSIONS

CBAS is a potentially safe and effective approach for SESCC on post-ER scars and represents an encouraging alternative to traditional endoscopic treatments.

Multiomic molecular characterization of the response to combination immunotherapy in MSS/pMMR metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations represent an emerging treatment strategies in cancer. However, their efficacy in microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) is variable. Here, a multiomic characterization was performed to identify predictive biomarkers associated with patient response to ICI combinations in MSS/pMMR CRC for the further development of ICI combinations.

METHODS

Whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry of tumors from patients with MSS/pMMR CRC, who received regorafenib plus nivolumab (REGONIVO) or TAS-116 plus nivolumab (TASNIVO) in clinical trials were conducted. Twenty-two and 23 patients without prior ICI from the REGONIVO and TASNIVO trials were included in this study. A biomarker analysis was performed using samples from each of these studies.

RESULTS

The epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathway and genes related to cancer-associated fibroblasts were upregulated in the REGONIVO responder group, and the G2M checkpoint pathway was upregulated in the TASNIVO responder group. The MYC pathway was upregulated in the REGONIVO non-responder group. Consensus molecular subtype 4 was significantly associated with response (p=0.035) and longer progression-free survival (p=0.006) in the REGONIVO trial. CD8+ T cells, regulatory T cells, and M2 macrophages density was significantly higher in the REGONIVO trial responders than in non-responders. Mutations in the POLE gene and patient response were significantly associated in the TASNIVO trial; however, the frequencies of other mutations or tumor mutational burden were not significantly different between responders and non-responders in either trial.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified molecular features associated with the response to the REGONIVO and TASNIVO, particularly those related to tumor microenvironmental factors. These findings are likely to contribute to the development of biomarkers to predict treatment efficacy for MSS/pMMR CRC and future immunotherapy combinations for treatment.

Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer with radiologically pure-solid appearance in Japan (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a post-hoc supplemental analysis of a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Although segmentectomy was better than lobectomy in terms of overall survival for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a pure-solid tumour appearance on thin-section CT in the open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 JCOG0802/WJOG4607L trial, the reasons why segmentectomy was associated with better overall survival were unclear. We aimed to compare the survival, cause of death, and recurrence patterns after segmentectomy versus lobectomy in trial participants with NSCLC with a pure-solid appearance METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc supplemental analysis of the JCO0802/WJOG4607L randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial for the patients (aged 20-85 years) with small-sized NSCLC with radiologically pure-solid appearance on thin-section CT (≤2 cm, consolidation tumour ratio 1·0). The primary aim was to compare the overall and relapse-free survival, cause of death, and recurrence patterns associated with segmentectomy and lobectomy for patients with radiologically pure-solid NSCLC to determine why the overall survival of segmentectomy was superior to that of lobectomy, even for oncologically invasive lung cancers. JCO0802/WJOG4607L is registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000002317, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 10, 2009, and Oct 21, 2014, 1106 patients were randomly assigned to undergo either lobectomy or segmentectomy. Of these participants, 553 (50%) had radiologically pure-solid NSCLC and were eligible for this post-hoc supplemental analysis. Of these 553 participants, 274 (50%) patients underwent lobectomy and 279 (50%) underwent segmentectomy. Median patient age was 67 years (IQR 61-73), 347 (63%) of 553 patients were male and 206 (37%) were female, and data on race and ethnicity were not collected. As of data cutoff (June 13, 2020), after a median follow-up of 7·3 years (IQR 6·0-8·5), the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly higher after segmentectomy than after lobectomy (86·1% [95% CI 81·4-89·7] in the lobectomy group, with 55 deaths vs 92·4% [88·6-95·0] in the segmentectomy group, with 38 deaths; hazard ratio (HR) 0·64 [95% CI 0·41-0·97]; log-rank test p=0·033), whereas the 5-year relapse-free survival was similar between the groups (81·7% [95% CI 76·5-85·8], with 34 events vs 82·0% [76·9-86·0], with 52 events; HR 1·01 [95% CI 0·72-1·42]; p=0·94). Deaths after a median follow-up of 7·3 years due to lung cancer occurred in 20 (7%) of 274 patients after lobectomy and 19 (7%) of 279 after segmentectomy, and deaths due to other causes occurred in 35 (13%) patients after lobectomy compared with 19 (7%) after segmentectomy (lung cancer death vs other cause of death, p=0·19). The locoregional recurrence was higher after segmentectomy (21 [8%] vs 45 [16%]; p=0·0021). In subgroup analyses, better 5-year overall survival after segmentectomy than after lobectomy was observed in the subgroup of patients aged 70 years or older (77·1% [95% CI 68·2-83·8] with lobectomy vs 85·6% [77·5-90·9] with segmentectomy; p=0·013) and in male patients (80·5% [73·7-85·7] vs 92·1% [87·0-95·2]; p=0·0085). By contrast, better 5-year relapse-free survival after lobectomy than after segmentectomy was observed in the subgroup younger than 70 years (87·4% [95% CI 81·2-91·7] with lobectomy vs 84·4% [77·9-89·1] with segmentectomy; p=0·049) and in female patients (94·2% [87·6-97·4] vs 82·2% [73·2-88·4]; p=0·047).

INTERPRETATION

This post-hoc analysis showed improved overall survival after segmentectomy in patients with pure-solid NSCLC compared with lobectomy. However, survival outcomes of segmentectomy depend on the patient's age and sex. Given the results of this exploratory analysis, further research is necessary to determine clinically relevant indications for segmentectomy in radiologically pure-solid NSCLC.

FUNDING

Japanese National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund and Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control Fund, and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan.

An accurate prediction of negative lymph node metastasis with consideration of glucose metabolism in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify risk factors in lymph node metastasis in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and predict lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

A total of 416 patients with clinical stage IA2-3 NSCLC who underwent lobectomy and lymph node dissection between July 2016 and December 2020 at National Cancer Center Hospital East were included. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to develop a model for predicting lymph node metastasis. Leave-one-out cross-validation was performed to evaluate the developing prediction model, and sensitivity, specificity, and concordance statistics were calculated to evaluate its diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

The formula for calculating the probability of pathological lymph node metastasis included SUVmax of the primary tumor and serum CEA level. The concordance statistics was 0.7452. When the cutoff value associated with the risk of incorrectly predicting pathological lymph node metastasis was 7.2%, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for predicting metastasis were 96.4% and 38.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We created a prediction model for lymph node metastasis in NSCLC by combining the SUVmax of the primary tumor and serum CEA levels, which showed a particularly strong association. This model is clinically useful as it successfully predicts negative lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical stage IA2-3 NSCLC.

Second free jejunum transfer after flap loss does not affect oral intake: A retrospective case-control study

PURPOSE

Free jejunum transfer is one of the standard procedures for restoring oral intake after total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy. Flap loss leading to a second free jejunum transfer rarely occurs. This study investigated the impact of a second free jejunum transfer on post-operative oral intake.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent a first free jejunum transfer between July 1998 and December 2019. A total of 367 patients were included in the study. Among them, 17 patients who underwent a second free jejunum transfer because necrosis constituted the second free jejunum transfer group, whereas 350 patients who did not require a second free jejunum transfer formed the first free jejunum transfer group. The incidence of dysphagia requiring tube feeding and post-operative complications was compared between the two groups. Moreover, risk factors for dysphagia and complications were estimated.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of dysphagia post-operation between the two groups. A second free jejunum transfer was a statistically significant factor for complications at 2- and 6-months post-operation; however, there were no significant differences in complication rates at the 12-month follow-up. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the incidence of severe complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Although a second free jejunum transfer increases early complications, it is not associated with major complications and does not negatively impact oral intake. These findings support the conclusion that free jejunum transfer is safe and helps maintain post-operative quality of life.

Risk factors for loss of pulmonary function after wedge resection for peripheral ground-glass opacity dominant lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify the risk factors for pulmonary functional deterioration after wedge resection for early-stage lung cancer with ground-glass opacity, which remain unclear, particularly in low-risk patients.

METHODS

We analysed 237 patients who underwent wedge resection for peripheral early-stage lung cancer in JCOG0804/WJOG4507L, a phase III, single-arm confirmatory trial. The changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s were calculated pre- and postoperatively, and a cutoff value of -10%, the previously reported reduction rate after lobectomy, was used to divide the patients into 2 groups: the severely reduced group (≤-10%) and normal group (>-10%). These groups were compared to identify predictors for severe reduction.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven (16%) patients experienced severe reduction. Lesions with a total tumour size ≥1 cm were significantly more frequent in the severely reduced group than in the normal group (89.2% vs 71.5%; P = 0.024). A total tumour size of ≥1 cm [odds ratio (OR), 3.287; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.114-9.699: P = 0.031] and pleural indentation (OR, 2.474; 95% CI, 1.039-5.890: P = 0.041) were significant predictive factors in the univariable analysis. In the multivariable analysis, pleural indentation (OR, 2.667; 95% CI, 1.082-6.574; P = 0.033) was an independent predictive factor, whereas smoking status and total tumour size were marginally significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the low-risk patients who underwent pulmonary wedge resection for early-stage lung cancer, 16% experienced severe reduction in pulmonary function. Pleural indentation may be a risk factor for severely reduced pulmonary function in pulmonary wedge resection.

Lymph node dissection in small peripheral lung cancer: Supplemental analysis of JCOG0802/WJOG4607L

OBJECTIVE

The optimal region of lymph node dissection (LND) during segmentectomy in patients with small peripheral non-small cell lung cancer requires clarification. Through a supplemental analysis of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0802/West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG) 4607L, we investigated the associated factors, distribution, and recurrence pattern of lymph node metastases (LNMs) and proposed the optimal LND region.

METHODS

Of the 1106 patients included in the JCOG0802/WJOG4607L, 1056 patients with LNDs were included in this supplemental analysis. We investigated the distribution and recurrence pattern of LNMs along with the radiologic findings (with ground-glass opacity, part-solid tumor; without ground-grass opacity component, pure-solid tumor).

RESULTS

The radiologic findings were the only significant factor for LNMs. Of 533 patients with part-solid tumors, 8 (1.5%) had LNMs. Further, only 3 (0.5%) patients had pN2 disease, and no patients had interlobar LNMs from nonadjacent segments. Of the 523 patients with pure-solid tumors, 55 (10.5%) had LNMs, and 28 (5.4%) had pN2 disease. Five patients had metastases to nonadjacent interlobar lymph nodes (LNs). Two (2.0%) patients with S6 tumors had upper mediastinal LNMs. In addition, the incidence of mediastinal LN recurrence in patients with S6 lung cancer was greater in those who underwent selective LND than those who underwent systematic LND (P = .0455).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonadjacent interlobar and mediastinal LND have little impact on pathologic nodal staging in patients with part-solid tumors. In contrast, selective LND is recommended at least for patients with pure-solid tumors.

Long-term outcome of patients with peripheral ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancer after sublobar resections

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term prognosis of patients with peripheral small ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancer after sublobar resection. We have already reported the 5-year safety and efficacy of sublobar resection and report the long-term outcomes after a 10-year follow-up period.

METHODS

Between May 2009 and April 2011, 333 patients with radiologically noninvasive peripheral lung cancer were enrolled from 51 institutions (median age, 62 years at registration) and followed up until May 6, 2021. Of these patients, sublobar resections with wedge resection as the first choice were performed in 314 patients (258 wedge resections and 56 segmentectomies), conversion lobectomies were performed in 11 patients, and 8 patients were ineligible.

RESULTS

The 10-year relapse-free survival and overall survival for the 314 patients with sublobar resections were 98.6% (95% confidence interval, 96.2-99.5) and 98.5% (95% confidence interval, 96.1-99.4), respectively. There was 1 local recurrence at the resection margin. Among the patients, second cancers were observed in 43 patients (13.4%; 95% confidence interval, 9.8-17.6), of which 18 were second lung cancers (5.8%; 95% confidence interval, 3.5-8.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancer is cured by sublobar resection, with wedge resection as the first choice, and the indications for other treatment options should be further investigated. The incidence of second cancer is similar to that in the general Japanese population.

[Integration Process of Clinical Trial Data in ARCAD-Asia]

In Europe and the United States, the Foundation Aide et Recherche en Cancérologie Digestive(ARCAD)database project was initiated in 2006 and 43,488 patient data(IPD)for metastatic colorectal cancer from 59 trials have been collected and constructed as the integrated database. The ARCAD-Asia was launched in 2021 and has been actively collecting Asian clinical trials and converted IPD are stored into the integrated database. In addition, the ARCAD-Asian data are transferred to ARCAD and IPD are integrated to ARCAD global database. All the data are shared with 3 data centers of ARCAD-Asia and ARCAD, located in France, the United States and Japan. In the ARCAD database, there are 1,673 IPD treated with placebo in a salvage line setting. We are now planning to utilize placebo IPD as the synthetic control arms(SCAs)to compare the efficacies of active agents. Furthermore, we will continue to collect the Asian IPD and will expand the cancer type, leading to more comprehensive global database.

NEXUS trial: a multicenter phase II clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the perioperative use of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab in patients with previously untreated surgically resectable BRAF V600E mutant colorectal oligometastases

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy for resectable BRAF V600E mutant colorectal oligometastases (CRM) has not been established due to the rarity and rapid progression of the disease. Since the unresectable recurrence rate is high, development of novel perioperative therapies are warranted. On December 2020, the BEACON CRC triplet regimen of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab was approved for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.

METHODS

The NEXUS trial is a multicenter phase II clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the perioperative use of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab in patients with previously untreated surgically resectable BRAF V600E mutant CRM. The key inclusion criteria are as follows: histologically diagnosed with colorectal adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma; RAS wild-type and BRAF V600E mutation by tissue or blood; and previously untreated resectable distant metastases. The triplet regimen (encorafenib: 300 mg daily; binimetinib: 45 mg twice daily; cetuximab: 400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2 weekly, 28 days/cycle) is administered for 3 cycles each before and after curative resection. The primary endpoint of the study is the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and the secondary end points are the PFS, disease-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate. The sample size is 32 patients. Endpoints in the NEXUS trial as well as integrated analysis with the nationwide registry data will be considered for seeking regulatory approval for the perioperative use of the triplet regimen.

DISCUSSION

The use of the triplet regimen in the perioperative period is expected to be safe and effective in patients with resectable BRAF V600E mutant CRM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCT2031220025, April. 16, 2022.

Prospective, Multi-Institutional Observational Study of Deterioration in Activities of Daily Living in Elderly Patients After Lung Cancer Surgery

Introduction

To determine the rate of deteriorating activities of daily living (ADL) and to investigate predictive factors in elderly patients undergoing surgery for NSCLC.

Methods

Patients with NSCLC aged 75 years or older who underwent curative surgical resection were evaluated using the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence Instrumental ADL (TMIG-IADL) and the Japanese version of EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) quality-of-life scale administered at baseline and at 6 months postoperative. The primary end point was the rate of living patients without substantial deterioration of TMIG-IADL, defined as a decline greater than or equal to three points. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors for deteriorating ADL.

Results

Between May 2019 and May 2020, 876 of the 986 screened patients enrolled from 47 institutions were eligible and included in the analysis. TMIG-IADL and EQ-5D-5L scores were obtained from 96.0% and 92.6% of the patients, respectively. At 6 months postoperative, 745 patients (85.1%, 95% confidence interval: 82.5%-87.3%) reported no significant ADL deterioration, and 96 of 841 patients (11.4%) with postoperative score data reported significant deterioration. The social domain was the most frequently affected activity. In multivariable analysis, poor performance status, low G8 geriatric screening score, segmentectomy (versus wedge resection), and surgery lasting less than 3 hours were associated with deteriorating ADL. Worsening EQ-5D-5L scores by minimally important difference or more were observed in 22.1% of the patients. Changes in TMIG-IADL and EQ-5D-5L scores were poorly correlated.

Conclusions

Approximately 15% of elderly patients with NSCLC experienced significant ADL deterioration at 6 months postoperative.

Immunohistochemistry and oxygen saturation endoscopic imaging reveal hypoxia in submucosal invasive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hypoxic microenvironment is prominent in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, it is unclear whether ESCC becomes hypoxic when it remains in the mucosal layer or as it invades the submucosal layer. We aimed to investigate whether intramucosal (Tis-T1a) or submucosal invasive (T1b) ESCC becomes hypoxic using endoscopic submucosal dissection samples.

METHODS

We evaluated the expression of hypoxia markers including hypoxia inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) by H-score and vessel density by microvessel count (MVC) and microvessel density (MVD) for CD31 and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) with immunohistochemical staining (n = 109). Further, we quantified oxygen saturation (StO2 ) with oxygen saturation endoscopic imaging (OXEI) (n = 16) and compared them to non-neoplasia controls, Tis-T1a, and T1b.

RESULTS

In Tis-T1a, cccIX (13.0 vs. 0.290, p < 0.001) and GLUT1 (199 vs. 37.6, p < 0.001) were significantly increased. Similarly, median MVC (22.7/mm2 vs. 14.2/mm2 , p < 0.001) and MVD (0.991% vs. 0.478%, p < 0.001) were markedly augmented. Additionally, in T1b, the mean expression of HIF-1α (16.0 vs. 4.95, p < 0.001), CAIX (15.7 vs. 0.290, p < 0.001), and GLUT1 (177 vs. 37.6, p < 0.001) were significantly heightened, and median MVC (24.8/mm2 vs. 14.2/mm2 , p < 0.001) and MVD (1.51% vs. 0.478%, p < 0.001) were markedly higher. Furthermore, OXEI revealed that median StO2 was significantly lower in T1b than in non-neoplasia (54% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.00131) and tended to be lower in T1b than in Tis-T1a (54% vs. 62%, p = 0.0606).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that ESCC becomes hypoxic even at an early stage, and is especially prominent in T1b.

Mitigation of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients using limb-cooling apparatus: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most common adverse events that can significantly impair the quality of life of patients. Although limb cooling may be beneficial for preventing CIPN, logistical challenges exist in ensuring consistent efficacy and safety. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to validate whether limb cooling with strict temperature control can reduce CIPN in patients with breast cancer receiving weekly paclitaxel as a perioperative treatment.

Methods

This study is a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. We plan to enroll patients with breast cancer who are scheduled to receive 12 weekly doses of paclitaxel (60 min 80 mg/m² intravenous infusion) as perioperative chemotherapy. Patients will be randomly divided into the intervention or control groups and undergo limb cooling therapy maintained at a constant temperature of 13°C and 25°C, respectively. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who report Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) ≥ D in their limbs by the end of the study treatment or at the time of discontinuation.

Discussion

The results of this trial will contribute to the establishment of new evidence for limb cooling therapy in the mitigation of CIPN and present a safe and stable cooling device that may be suitable for use in the clinic.

Clinical trial registration

https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2032210115, identifier jRCT2032210115.

Hot snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection using bipolar snare for intermediate size colorectal lesions: Propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection (ER) with bipolar snare, in which the electric current only passes through the tissue between the device’s two electrodes, is a prominent method used to prevent perforation due to electricity potentially. ER using bipolar snare with or without submucosal injection enabled safe resection of colorectal lesions measuring 10–15 mm in an ex vivo porcine model. ER with bipolar snare is expected to have good treatment outcomes in 10–15 mm colorectal lesions, with high safety even without submucosal injection. However, no clinical reports have compared treatment outcomes with and without submucosal injection.

AIM

To compare the treatment outcomes of bipolar polypectomy with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) to those with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

METHODS

In this single-centre retrospective study, we enrolled 10–15 mm nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (565 Lesions in 463 patients) diagnosed as type 2A based on the Japan Narrow-band Imaging Expert Team classification, resected by either HSP or EMR between January 2018 and June 2021 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. Lesions were divided into HSP and EMR groups, and propensity score matching was performed. In the matched cohort, en bloc and R0 resection rates and adverse events were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 565 lesions in 463 patients, 117 lesions each in the HSP and EMR groups were selected after propensity score matching. In the original cohort, there was a significant difference in antithrombotic drug use (P < 0.05), lesion size (P < 0.01), location (P < 0.01), and macroscopic type (P < 0.05) between the HSP and EMR groups. In the matched cohort, the en bloc resection rates were comparable between both groups [93.2% (109/117) vs 92.3% (108/117), P = 0.81], and there was no significant difference in the R0 resection rate [77.8% (91/117) vs 80.3% (94/117), P = 0.64]. The incidence of delayed bleeding was similar in both groups [1.7% (2/117)]. Perforation occurred in the EMR group [0.9% (1/117)] but not in the HSP group.

CONCLUSION

Using bipolar snare, ER of nonpedunculated 10–15 mm colorectal lesions may be performed safely and effectively, even without submucosal injection.

Clinical Validation of Plasma-Based Genotyping for RAS and BRAF V600E Mutation in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: SCRUM-Japan GOZILA Substudy

PURPOSE

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genotyping on the basis of next-generation sequencing (NGS) may guide targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the validity of NGS-based ctDNA genotyping for RAS/BRAF V600E mutation assessment and the efficacy of anti-EGFR and BRAF-targeted therapies on the basis of ctDNA results remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The performance of NGS-based ctDNA genotyping for RAS/BRAF V600E mutation assessment was compared with that of a validated polymerase chain reaction-based tissue testing in patients with mCRC enrolled in the GOZILA study, a nationwide plasma genotyping study. The primary end points were concordance rate, sensitivity, and specificity. The efficacy of anti-EGFR and BRAF-targeted therapies on the basis of ctDNA were also evaluated.

RESULTS

In 212 eligible patients, the concordance rate, sensitivity, and specificity were 92.9% (95% CI, 88.6 to 96.0), 88.7% (95% CI, 81.1 to 94.0), and 97.2% (95% CI, 92.0 to 99.4) for RAS and 96.2% (95% CI, 92.7 to 98.4), 88.0% (95% CI, 68.8 to 97.5), and 97.3% (95% CI, 93.9 to 99.1) for BRAF V600E, respectively. In patients with a ctDNA fraction of ≥1.0%, sensitivity rose to 97.5% (95% CI, 91.2 to 99.7) and 100% (95% CI, 80.5 to 100.0) for RAS and BRAF V600E mutations, respectively. In addition to a low ctDNA fraction, previous chemotherapy, lung and peritoneal metastases, and interval between dates of tissue and blood collection were associated with discordance. The progression-free survival of anti-EGFR therapy and BRAF-targeted treatment was 12.9 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 18.5) and 3.7 (95% CI, 1.3 to not evaluated) months, respectively, for matched patients with RAS/BRAF V600E results by ctDNA.

CONCLUSION

ctDNA genotyping effectively detected RAS/BRAF mutations, especially with sufficient ctDNA shedding. Clinical outcomes support ctDNA genotyping for determining the use of anti-EGFR and BRAF-targeted therapies in patients with mCRC.

Long-term follow-up after R-High CHOP/CHASER/LEED with Auto-PBSCT in untreated mantle cell lymphoma-Final analysis of JCOG0406

Progression-free survival after R-High CHOP/CHASER/LEED with auto-PBSCT in untreated mantle cell lymphoma in JCOG0406 study. A continuous pattern of relapse was observed.

Segmentectomy for ground-glass-dominant lung cancer with a tumour diameter of 3 cm or less including ground-glass opacity (JCOG1211): a multicentre, single-arm, confirmatory, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Although segmentectomy is a widely used surgical procedure, lobectomy is the standard procedure for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of segmentectomy for NSCLC up to 3 cm in size, including ground-glass opacity (GGO) and predominant GGO.

METHODS

A multicentre, single-arm, confirmatory phase 3 trial was conducted across 42 institutions (hospitals, university hospitals, and cancer centres) in Japan. Segmentectomy with hilar, interlobar, and intrapulmonary lymph node dissection was performed as protocol surgery for patients with a tumour diameter of up to 3 cm, including GGO and dominant GGO. Eligible patients were those aged 20-79 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0 or 1 and clinical stage IA tumour confirmed by thin-sliced CT. The primary endpoint was 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS). This study is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials (UMIN000011819), and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

A total of 396 patients were registered from Sept 20, 2013, to Nov 13, 2015, of whom 357 underwent segmentectomy. At a median follow-up of 5·4 years (IQR 5·0-6·0), the 5-year RFS was 98·0% (95% CI 95·9-99·1). This finding exceeded the 87% of the pre-set threshold 5-year RFS and the primary endpoint was met. Grade 3 or 4 early postoperative complications occurred in seven patients (2%), but no grade 5 treatment-related deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Segmentectomy should be considered as part of standard treatment for patients with predominantly GGO NSCLC with a tumour size of 3 cm or less in diameter, including GGO even if it exceeds 2 cm.

FUNDING

National Cancer Centre Research and Development Fund and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.

Efficacy of Targeted Trials and Signaling Pathway Landscape in Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancers From SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN: A Nationwide Genomic Profiling Program

PURPOSE

Genomic profiling programs have been implemented to apply next-generation sequencing (NGS) for facilitating trial enrollment. SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN is a large-scale genomic profiling program in advanced gastrointestinal cancers using a validated genomic assay with the goal of facilitating enrollment in targeted clinical trials, generating real-world data, and performing clinicogenomic analysis for biomarker discovery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Genotyping of tumor tissue samples from 5,743 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers enrolled in GI-SCREEN was centrally performed with NGS. Patients were enrolled in matched trials of targeted agents affiliated with GI-SCREEN on the basis of genotyping results.

RESULTS

A total of 11 gastrointestinal cancers were included, with colorectal cancer being the most common. The median age ranged from 59 to 70.5 years across cancer types. Patients enrolled after initiation of first-line treatment had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than that before treatment initiation with a median survival time difference of 8.9 months and a hazard ratio (HR) ranging from 0.25 to 0.73 across cancer types, demonstrating an immortal time bias. One hundred and forty-nine patients received matched therapies in clinical trials on the basis of their identified alterations. Among patients with colorectal cancer harboring actionable alterations, the median OS was significantly longer in patients who received matched therapies in trials than in those who did not (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.01; P = .049). Cancer-specific pathway alterations were significantly associated with shorter survival and related to primary resistance to matched trial therapies.

CONCLUSION

Our genomic profiling program led to patient enrollment in targeted clinical trials and improved survival of patients with colorectal cancer who received matched therapies in clinical trials. To avoid immortal time bias, precautions are needed when using data from patients who have undergone NGS testing after initiation of the evaluated treatment line.

Long-term survival outcomes after lobe-specific nodal dissection in patients with early non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the long-term outcomes of lobe-specific nodal dissection (LSD) and systematic nodal dissection (SND) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with c-stage I and II NSCLC who underwent lobectomy with mediastinal nodal dissection were retrospectively analysed. After propensity score matching, we assessed the overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cumulative incidence of death (CID) from primary lung cancer and other diseases.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 8.4 years. Among 438 propensity score-matched pairs, OS and RFS were similar between the LSD and SND groups [hazard ratio (HR), 0.979; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.799-1.199; and HR, 0.912; 95% CI, 0.762-1.092, respectively], but the LSD group showed a better prognosis after 5 years postoperatively. CID from primary lung cancer was similar between the 2 groups (HR, 1.239; 95% CI, 0.940-1.633). However, the CID from other diseases was lower in the LSD group than in the SND group (HR, 0.702; 95% CI, 0.525-0.938). According to c-stage, the LSD group tended towards worse OS and RFS, with higher CID from primary lung cancer than the SND group, in patients with c-stage II.

CONCLUSIONS

LSD provides acceptable long-term survival for patients with early-stage NSCLC. However, LSD may not be suitable for patients with c-stage II NSCLC due to the higher mortality risk from primary lung cancer.

Investigation of predictive biomarkers in patients treated with atezolizumab monotherapy following definitive chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EPOC1802)

416

Background: Platinum-based definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is the standard treatment for patients (pts) with unresectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), invading the aorta, vertebral body, or trachea. However, complete response (CR) rates are low (11–25%), with a median overall survival (OS) of 9–10 months. We previously reported atezolizumab following dCRT indicated promising 42.1% of confirmed CR (cCR) rate and 65.8% of 12-months OS (Bando H, et al., ESMO Congress 2022 ). Methods: We investigated predictive biomarkers for cCR in this multicenter phase II study. PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) was examined with VENTANA PD-L1. Immunological phenotypes of tumor microenvironments were assessed with multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) and multi-color flow cytometry (FCM). Cancer gene aberrations and gene expression were investigated with whole exome and whole transcriptome sequencing (WES/WTS), respectively. Results: In 35 pts with an evaluable PD-L1 TPS, the cCR rates of <1% and ≥1% were 44.4% and 41.2%, respectively. In mIHC analysis of 28 pts, the number of CD3+CD8+PD-1+ T cells and CD3+CD8-FOXP3+ T cells prior to CRT in tumor tissue were significantly correlated with cCR and non-cCR, respectively (both are P<0.05). In FCM analysis of 19 pts, tumor-infiltrating PD-1+CD8+ T cells prior to CRT, after CRT, and after atezolizumab were significantly correlated with cCR (P<0.05). On the other hand, CTLA-4+FOXP3highCD45RA-CD4+ regulatory T cells (Treg cells) after CRT were significantly correlated with non-cCR (P<0.05). In WES of 27 pts, MYC amplification, EGFR mutation, PIK3CA mutation, PTEN mutation, and KEAP1 mutation were detected in pts with non-cCR. In WTS of 27 pts, gene expression signatures of IFN-γ response and inflammatory response were enhanced after CRT. Gene expression signatures of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and TGF-β signalings prior to CRT were significantly enriched in pts with cCR. Conclusions: Our biomarker analysis suggests that tumor-infiltrating PD-1+CD8+ T cells prior to CRT may be a predictive biomarker for cCR of CRT followed by atezolizumab, and that several driver gene abnormalities, cancer intrinsic signatures and tumor-infiltrating Treg cells are associated with treatment resistance. These findings could enable subsequent biomarker-selected clinical trials and lead to the development of novel cancer immunotherapeutic strategies. Clinical trial information: UMIN000034373 .

BAYONET trial: A multicenter phase II trial of staged combination with encorafenib + binimetinib + cetuximab following encorafenib + cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

TPS271

Background: While the triplet combination of encorafenib (ENCO) + binimetinib (BINI) + cetuximab (CET) indicated higher response rate compared to the doublet combination of ENCO + CET, no significant survival benefits of the triplet combination were observed in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) according to BEACON CRC study. Although ENCO + CET is the standard 2nd-line therapy in the United States and European Union, poor prognoses are expected after disease progression. As resistant mechanisms of BRAF + EGFR blockage, several MAPK pathway alternations, including RAS and RAF mutations were reported, which suggests the additional blockade of MAPK signaling may be an effective strategy for ENCO + CET refractory mCRC. In addition, the preclinical study suggested BRAF inhibitor + anti-EGFR antibody resistant BRAF V600E-mutant colorectal cancer cell-lines were sensitive to the combination of BRAF inhibitor + MEK inhibitor + anti-EGFR antibody (Oddo D, et al. Cancer Res. 2016). Methods: BAYONET is a single-arm multicenter phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the staged combination with ENCO + BINI + CET for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC who were refractory to ENCO + CET. The main eligibility criteria are as follows; RAS wild-type/ BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC; age ≥ 20; ECOG PS 0 or 1; within 4 weeks from the last administration of previous ENCO or CET; no administration of other systemic therapy after refractoriness to ENCO + CET; complete response, partial response, or ≥4 months of stable disease were observed in the previous ENCO + CET. Included patients receive the combination treatment of ENCO (300mg once a day) + BINI (45mg twice a day) + CET (400mg/m2 initial dose and then 250mg/m2 once a week) in a 28 day-cycle as a study treatment. The primary endpoint of this trial is 12-week progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary endpoints include PFS, overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, time to treatment failure, and the incidence of adverse events. The targeted sample size was calculated to be 30 on the basis of a power of 80%, a significant level of 10% (one-sided), the threshold 12-week PFS rate of 20%, and the expected 12-week PFS rate of 40%. As a translational analysis, circulating tumor DNA for next-generation sequencing using Guardant360 is collected at twice time points (before and after study treatment) to investigate the resistance mechanisms. Enrollment started from Jan 2022 and is ongoing at 25 facilities in Japan. As of Sep 20, 2022, 9 patients were enrolled. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031210510 .

TRIDENTE trial: A phase II study of rechallenge with encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab in patients with RAS wild-type/BRAF V600E–mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

TPS264

Background: The BEACON CRC trial demonstrated survival benefit of combination therapy with encorafenib (ENCO) + cetuximab (CET) +/- binimetinib (BINI) in patients with RAS wild-type (WT)/ BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, prognosis of those patients still be poor after the refractoriness to the BEACON combination therapy. One of resistant mechanisms to BRAF inhibitor has been reported as MAPK alterations including RAS mutation, similar to those for anti-EGFR antibody in patients with RAS/ BRAF V600E WT mCRC. Promising results of rechallenge therapy with anti-EGFR antibody in patients with RAS/ BRAF V600E WT mCRC and with combination of BRAF inhibitor + MEK inhibitor in patients with BRAF V600 mutant melanoma suggest the treatment strategy of rechallenge therapy with the BEACON triplet therapy in patients with RAS WT/ BRAF V600E mutant mCRC. Methods: TRIDENTE trial is a multicenter phase II trial to assess efficacy and safety of rechallenge therapy with ENCO + BINI + CET in patients with RAS WT/ BRAF V600E mutant mCRC after the refractoriness to either the BEACON doublet or triplet therapy. Key eligibility criteria includes RAS WT/ BRAF V600E mutant mCRC; ≥ 20 years old; ECOG PS 0-1; refractory or intolerant to at least one fluoropyrimidine-based regimen (including irinotecan or oxaliplatin); refractory or intolerant to anti-PD-1 antibody if patients with MSI-high; history of previous combination therapy containing ENCO + CET with at least partial response by RECIST v1.1; confirmed disease progression within 4 weeks after last administration of previous ENCO; ≥ 4 months of period between the last administration of previous ENCO and the start of study treatment. Enrolled patients receive the combination therapy with ENCO (300 mg, QD), BINI (45 mg, BID), and CET (initially 400 mg/m2, and subsequently 250 mg/m2, QW) as the study treatment. Primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR) by investigators’ assessment in patients receiving at least one dose of study treatment. A target sample size is calculated to be 21 on the hypothesis that the threshold ORR is 3% and expected ORR is 20%, with a significant level of 5% (one-sided) and power of 80%. Secondary endpoint includes progression-free and overall survivals, disease control rate, and safety. Exploratory molecular analysis is performed using targeted next-generation sequencing in circulating-tumor DNA at the timepoints of baseline and discontinuation of study treatment. As of September 19, 2022, 8 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031210511 .

Survival outcomes and functional results of VOLTAGE-A: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and consolidation nivolumab (nivo) in patients (pts) with both microsatellite stable (MSS) and microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)

108

Background: In VOLTAGE-A, CRT (50.4 Gy with capecitabine of 1,650 mg/m2) followed by five cycles of consolidation Nivo (240 mg q2 weeks [W]) and radical surgery showed 30% of pathological complete response (pCR) in pts with MSS and 60% in MSI-H T3–4 NanyM0 LARC. Here, we report survival outcomes and functional results. Methods: All 39 MSS and 5 MSI-H pts were included in the VOLTAGE-A from Jan 2017 to Oct 2019. Survival outcomes, late adverse events, and patient-reported outcome measurements for urogenital and anal functions were analyzed. Urinary function was evaluated using the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) periodically at 1W, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (M), postoperatively. Sexual function in sexually active male pts was evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score at 3, 6, and 12M, postoperatively. Anal function was evaluated using the Wexner score, low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score, and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI) score at 1-year post-surgery. All functional scores were evaluated preoperatively. Results: With a median follow-up of 44.8M (range, 25.7-58.9M), the 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were respectively 79.5% and 97.4% in MSS, and 100% each in MSI-H pts. Of the MSS pts, those with pCR, clinical CR (cCR) according to the MSKCC criteria, high PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥1%), and CD8/eTreg ratios of ≥2.5 had a trend of better 3-year RFS and OS than those without. During the follow-up period, one patient developed CTCAE grade 3 immune-related colitis, which was diagnosed 20M after the last dose of Nivo. Postoperative functional results were acceptable in both populations; pre-surgical median I-PSS scores were 3, whereas postsurgical values were 5 (1W), 5.5 (1M), 5 (3M), 4 (6M), and 4 (12M); median IIEF score was 20 at pre-surgery and 6 (3M), 6 (6M), and 8 (12M) at post-surgery; median scores of Wexner, LARS, and FISI were 2, 23, and 7 at pre-surgery, and 9, 30, and 17 at 1-year post-surgery, respectively. Conclusions: Preoperative CRT followed by Nivo showed promising survival outcomes in both MSS and MSI-H LARC pts. The therapeutic effect of pCR, cCR, and certain biomarkers analyzed by pre-CRT samples could be used as prognostic predictors in MSS pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02948348 .[Table: see text]

Single-stapling technique versus hand-sewn anastomosis in inter-sphincteric resection with transanal total mesorectal excision (Super SST): protocol for a multicentre randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Currently, hand-sewn anastomosis is the standard procedure for inter-sphincteric resection (ISR); however, distal purse-string suturing during transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has allowed a single-stapling technique (SST). Although it was originally intended for cases requiring anastomosis of 2 cm or more above the anorectal junction (ARJ), SST could be safely performed in ISR. The aim of this trial is to determine the superiority of SST over hand-sewn anastomosis in ISR with TaTME.

METHODS

The Super SST trial is a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing stapled and hand-sewn anastomoses in ISR with TaTME. The trial will recruit patients scheduled for TaTME with anastomosis below the ARJ, who will be allocated 1:1 to receive either hand-sewn or stapled anastomosis. The primary endpoint is anastomosis-related complications within 30 postoperative days. Secondary endpoints include all early and late complications, operating time, reoperation, mortality rate, length of postoperative hospital stay, readmission, incidence of anal pain and rectal mucosal prolapse, length of temporary stoma retention, the proportion of patients with a temporary stoma at 1 year after surgery, and anorectal function at 1 year after surgery.

CONCLUSION

This trial will provide important clinical insights for new and promising anastomotic options for patients with very low rectal cancer. Registration number: UMIN000047818 (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htme).

Comparison between three age-stratified cohorts reveals poor prognosis of young patients with tongue carcinoma

Objectives

Investigation of the prognosis of young patients with tongue carcinoma has been the focus of several recent studies aimed at improving future precision treatment. Most studies have been two-cohort investigations comparing young and older patients, who have wide discrepancies in prognosis. Older patients, especially those aged >70 years, often have a poor general condition. This affects the prognosis of the older cohort and accounts for the discrepancies observed in two-cohort studies. Accordingly, in this study, older patients (aged ≥71 years) were separated and compared to young and middle-aged patients.

Methods

A total of 257 patients with oral tongue carcinoma referred during 2011–2017 were analyzed. Patients were sorted into young (aged ≤40 years), middle-aged (aged ≥41 and ≤70 years), and older (aged ≥71 years) groups. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared among the groups. Furthermore, patterns of recurrence rates were compared.

Results

Compared with young patients, there was no difference in OS or DFS for older patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5–2.7 and HR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.4–1.2, respectively) in a multivariate analysis. There was also no difference in OS (HR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.3–1.3) for middle-aged patients. However, middle-aged patients had low recurrence rates (HR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3–0.8). With respect to the recurrence type, middle-aged patients had a low local recurrence rate (HR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1–0.7).

Conclusion

Three-cohort studies should be conducted to evaluate whether the prognosis of young patients with tongue carcinoma is truly poor in terms of future precision treatment.

Updated Efficacy Outcomes of Anti-PD-1 Antibodies plus Multikinase Inhibitors for Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer with or without Liver Metastases in Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

We previously reported preliminary activity of regorafenib plus nivolumab (REGONIVO) or lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (LENPEM) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Meanwhile, several studies demonstrated liver metastases are less responsive to immunotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Combined efficacy outcomes with a longer follow-up in a phase Ib trial of REGONIVO and a phase II trial of LENPEM were examined in AGC with or without liver metastases (REGONIVO plus LENPEM cohort). We also investigated the efficacy of anti-PD-1 monotherapies (anti-PD-1 monotherapy cohort). A comparison of the immune microenvironment between gastric primary tumors and liver metastases was also conducted by multiplex IHC.

RESULTS

In the REGONIVO plus LENPEM cohort, with a median follow-up of 14.0 months, objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) were 46%, 7.8 months, and 15.6 months in patients with liver metastases, while 69%, 6.9 months, and 15.5 months in those without. In the anti-PD-1 monotherapy cohort, with a median follow-up of 27.6 months, ORR, mPFS, and mOS were 9%, 1.4 months, and 6.4 months in patients with liver metastases, while 22%, 2.3 months, and 9.0 months in those without. Multiplex IHC revealed liver metastases were associated with an abundance of immune-suppressive cells, such as tumor-associated macrophages and regulatory T cells, with fewer CD8+ T cells compared with gastric primary tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-PD-1 antibodies plus regorafenib or lenvatinib for AGC showed promising antitumor activity with a longer follow-up, irrespective of liver metastases status, despite a more immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment in liver metastases.

Prognostic Impact of Examined Mediastinal Lymph Node Count in Clinical N0 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The number of examined mediastinal lymph nodes (mLNs) could represent the quality of mediastinal lymphadenectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the number of examined individual mLNs in patients with resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 1,420 patients with clinical-stage IA-IIB, N0 NSCLC who underwent complete resection by lobectomy, which involved hilar and mLN dissection, between 2008 and 2016. We investigated the threshold number of examined mLNs that had prognostic significance and evaluated their effects on the risk of mLN recurrence.

RESULTS

In a respective multivariable analysis according to the number of examined mLNs, examining ≥3 mLNs (reference [ref.] mLNs ≤2) achieved statistical significance and had the best prognosis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; p = 0.013). In the multivariable analyses for each pathological N (pN) stage, ≥3 examined mLNs (ref. mLNs ≤2) was an independent prognostic factor in pN1 disease (HR, 0.32, p = 0.002), but not in pN0 or pN2 disease. The cumulative incidence of mLN recurrence was significantly lower in patients with ≥3 examined mLNs (ref. mLNs ≤2, HR, 0.27; p = 0.008) in pN1 disease. Patients with ≥3 examined mLNs had higher upstaging rates to pN2 than those with ≤2 examined mLNs.

CONCLUSIONS

Examining ≥3 mLNs contributed to a favorable prognosis and low mLN recurrence risk in patients with clinical stage I-II, N0 NSCLC. Our findings can serve as a benchmark for the number of required mLNs to be examined.

Impact of Older Age and Medico-social Factors on the Decision to Offer Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Patients With Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Although clinicians are expected to set a higher threshold for administering adjuvant chemotherapy to older than younger patients with breast cancer, the extent to which older patients are less likely to be offered adjuvant chemotherapy and the medico-social factors that influence decision-making are unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the correlations of clinicopathological factors, including age (≥75 years vs. <75 years), for all candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy, and of additional medico-social factors, including the number of family members living together, for older patients, with the rate of referral from breast surgeons to medical oncologists.

RESULTS

Among 872 candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy, age ≥75 years was significantly correlated with a lower referral rate (24 % vs. 44%, p<0.001). In the analysis by age group, we did not identify specific medicosocial factors that were differentially emphasized, but older patients who lived with ≥2 other family members tended not to be referred to a medical oncologist compared to those who lived alone or with one family member (1/23 vs. 15/47). Although 5 of 22 older patients (23%) who were referred to a medical oncologist actually received adjuvant chemotherapy (vs. 60% of younger patients), all needed treatment modifications.

CONCLUSION

Breast surgeons regard age ≥75 years as a key factor for avoiding adjuvant chemotherapy but they also consider similar medico-social factors irrespective of the patient's age regarding the decision to refer patients to medical oncologists.

Factors of technical difficulty in conventional and traction-assisted esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

The traction assisted (TA) method has reduced the technical difficulty associated with esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, it is unclear which factors associated with difficulty have been improved by the TA-ESD method. We aimed to evaluate and compare difficulty factors between conventional and TA-ESD.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled patients treated by ESD from Apr 2010 to Jun 2014 for the conventional ESD cohort and from Jan 2016 to Dec 2019 for the TA-ESD cohort. Difficult cases were defined as; (1)  ≥ 120 min ESD procedure time, (2) intraoperative perforation, or (3) piecemeal resection. We explored and compared the factors associated with technical difficulty in each cohort.

RESULTS

The conventional and TA-ESD cohorts included 285 (299 lesions) and 387 (421 lesions) patients, respectively. For difficult cases, the conventional and TA-ESD cohorts had 91 (30%) and 71 (17%) lesions, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression showed that ≥ 30 mm lesion length (odds ratio (OR) 6.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.47-13.50), lower esophagus (OR 2.37, 95% Cl 1.34-4.21), > 1/2 circumference (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.28-3.99), and left wall (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.42-5.20) in the conventional ESD cohort, and ≥ 30 mm lesion length (21.30, 95% CI 4.75-95.30), lower esophagus (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.52-6.13), and > 1/2 circumference (OR 6.40, 95% CI 3.06-13.40) in the TA-ESD cohort, were independently associated with technical difficulty.

CONCLUSIONS

TA-ESD can reduce the difficulty in cases including lesions in the left wall; however, cases in the lower esophagus and large lesions were still difficult to simplify.

Abstract 5185: First in human trial of off-the shelf iPS derived anti-GPC3 NK cells for recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma with peritoneal dissemination

Background: The development of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has introduced an effective strategy to guide and promote the immune response. Also, gene-engineering NK cells to express an exogenous CAR receptor allows the innate anti-tumor ability of NK cells to be directed against target tumor antigen. However, these autologous applications are limited by toxicities, restricted trafficking and infiltration into tumor, suboptimal persistence, and exhausted status of immune cells that may cause manufacturing failure. One approach to overcome those limitations is the development of “off-the-shelf” iPS-cell sources. The iCAR-ILC-N101 is an allogeneic human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-homozygous induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived anti-glypican-3 (GPC3) CAR-expressing innate lymphoid cells/natural killer cell (ILC/NK), which has both antigen-specific and NK activating receptor-mediated cytotoxicity. The iCAR-ILC-N101 is produced from the established iPSC strain QHJI01s04, and there is theoretically no risk of developing graft-versus host disease because the product dose not have T cell receptor. The product has a relevant living period in the body, thereby has little concern about residual toxicity and reduces systemic side effects by topical treatment. GPC3 is a cancer-specific membranous protein that is expressed in hepatoblastoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) but is not expressed in normal tissue. OCCC is a relatively rare malignancy and is associated with poor prognosis. Intraperitoneal administration of iCAR-ILC-N101 is expected to show antitumor activity for OCCC patients with peritoneal dissemination that express GPC3 and reduce systemic side effects, thereby ensuring safety and improving therapeutic efficacy. Preclinical study showed that intraperitoneal injection of iCAR-ILC-N101 for GPC3-positive ovarian tumor-bearing immunodeficient mouse model showed suppressed tumor growth.

Method: This is a first-in human phase 1 study to evaluate safety, toxicity and efficacy of the iCAR-ILC-N101 in patients with GPC3-positive advanced or recurrent OCCC harboring peritoneal dissemination. Major inclusion criteria include histologically diagnosed GPC3-positive advanced or recurrent OCCC with peritoneal dissemination who are resistant to standard therapy and have matched HLA-A24 or B52. The study includes 3 cohorts (cohort -1, 0.5x106 cells/kg; cohort 1, 1x106 cells/kg; cohort 2, 3x106 cells/kg) and starts with cohort 1. The iCAR-ILC-N101 is administered intraperitoneally once a week for 4 weeks; for the first patient in each cohort, patient is observed for 14 days for safety evaluation after the first administration and then receive iCAR-ILC-N101 on day15 and 22. Enrollment initiated in July 2021 and one patient was enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Clinical trial registry number: jRCT2033200431

Citation Format: Kenichi Harano, Shin Kaneko, Tetsuya Nakatsura, Junichiro Yuda, Nozomu Fuse, Akihiro Sato, Reiko Watanabe, Genichiro Ishii, Toru Mukohara, Hiroshi Tanabe, Yukiko Ishiguro, Hideki Furuya, Masashi Wakabayashi, Miki Fukutani, Manami Shimomura, Tatsuki Ueda, Shoichi Iriguchi, Ayako Kumagai, Kengo Nakagoshi, Aki Sasaki, Toshihiko Doi. First in human trial of off-the shelf iPS derived anti-GPC3 NK cells for recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma with peritoneal dissemination [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5185.

Phase 2 study of trastuzumab deruxtecan in the neoadjuvant treatment for patients with HER2-positive gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (EPOC2003)

TPS4161

Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a cytotoxic topoisomerase I inhibitor. DESTINY-Gastric01 study showed significantly higher objective response rate with T-DXd than physician's choice of chemotherapy (51.3%, vs. 14.3%, Shitara K, et al. NEJM 2020) as well as prolonged overall survival (median 12.5 vs. 8.4 months, hazard ratio 0.59). Considering that high response rate or major pathological response (MPR), which is defined as the proportion of subjects with < 10% residual tumor may be associated with favorable survival outcomes after preoperative chemotherapy, T-DXd could be a promising neoadjuvant treatment for patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. However, to our knowledge, there is no currently ongoing study of T-DXd as a neoadjuvant setting for patients with gastric and GEJ cancers. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, investigator initiated phase 2 trial to evaluate antitumor activity of T-DXd as the neoadjuvant treatment for patients with HER2 positive gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma. Eligible patients should have previously untreated locally advanced gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma with clinical stage of T2-4 and/or N+ without distant metastasis. The main cohort will enroll patients with HER2 overexpression defined as immunohistochemistry （IHC）3+ or IHC2+/ in situ hybridization（ISH）+ by local assessment. According to the results of exploratory biomarker analysis of DESTINY-Gastric01 study (Shitara K, et al. ESMO-GI2021), patients with HER2-low expression (IHC1+ or 2+ with ISH negative) with HER2-extra cellular domein (ECD) higher than 11.6 ng/ml also will be enrolled into the exploratory cohort. Patients will receive 3 cycles of T-DXd (6.4mg/kg) by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks followed by surgery at 3 to 8 weeks after last T-DXd infusion.The primary endpoint is MPR rate. The threshold in the main cohort is defined as 20%, and the expected MPR rate was set at 45%. The minimum sample size of this trial is 23 patients in the main cohort (α- and β-error probabilities, 0.1 and 0.15, respectively). Total number of patients will be increased up to 27 patients depending on the enrollment. In addition, 10 patients will be recruited into the exploratory cohort. Secondary endpoints are pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, curative resection rate, and adverse event rate. Biomarker analyses including whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, proteomics, and ctDNA changes will also be conducted using pre- and post-treatment tumor and blood samples. Enrollment is ongoing at six sites in Japan from November 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT05034887.

Plasma RAS dynamics and anti-EGFR rechallenge efficacy in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: REMARRY and PURSUIT trials

3518

Background: Rechallenge with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (EGFR mAb) showed certain activities in patients (pts) with RAS/ BRAF V600E wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), particularly in pts with negative plasma RAS (p RAS) mutation by circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay at ‘just before’ the rechallenge therapy. However, the efficacy is unknown in pts with RAS/ BRAF wt mCRC whose p RAS was converted to positive once during or after EGFR mAb. Therefore, we conducted REMARRY, a prospective longitudinal study to investigate the p RAS dynamics, and PURSUIT trials, a phase II trial to investigate the efficacy of EGFR mAb rechallenge in pts with p RAS wt just before rechallenge therapy. Methods: The eligibility criteria of REMARRY trial included RAS/ BRAF V600E wt mCRC; ECOG PS 0-1; CR or PR during EGFR mAb; and a refractory ≤ 2 months from the last administration of EGFR mAb. p RAS status by the BEAMing method was prospectively monitored at timepoints of progression on EGFR mAb and each subsequent therapy. The eligibility criteria of PURSUIT trial included enrollment in the REMARRY trial with confirmed p RAS wt prior to enrollment in PURSUIT trial; being refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan; and ≥ 4 months of EGFR mAb-free interval. Study treatment was rechallenge with panitumumab + irinotecan (6 mg/kg + 150 mg/m2 q2wks). Primary endpoint was a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1. The required number of pts was 45, with a null ORR of 10%, an expected ORR of 25%, power of 85%, and one-sided α of 0.05. Results: Between May 2019 and May 2021, 183 pts with 343 timepoints (median, 2) were enrolled in REMARRY trial from 27 institutions, and 50 pts were enrolled in PURSUIT trial; median age, 68 years; left-sided primary, 44 pts; prior EGFR mAb, 1st/2nd/≥3rd lines was 28/6/16 pts; and p RAS status at progression on prior EGFR mAb, wt/mutant (mt)/unknown in 31/7/12 pts. Confirmed ORR and disease control rate were 14% (90% CI, 7.8%–23.9%) and 80% (95% CI, 67.0%–88.8%), respectively. In addition, 4 pts showed an unconfirmed PR. With a median follow-up time of 8.7 months, median progression-free survival was 3.6 months (95% CI, 3.0 – 4.7 months). The subgroup analysis showed a significantly higher confirmed ORR in pts with a longer EGFR mAb-free interval than a shorter one (> vs. < 365 days, 44.4% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.0037). Without any unexpected safety signals, 58.5% of pts had ≥ grade 3 adverse events. Of 31 patients with wt p RAS at progression on prior EGFR mAb, 5 had a confirmed response (ORR, 16%), whereas no response was observed in patients with 7 p RAS mt (ORR, 0%) (p = 0.25). Conclusions: The primary endpoint of confirmed ORR was not met; however, pts with p RAS wt at progression on prior EGFR mAb may benefit from rechallenge with, implying a lack of or worse response if p RAS becomes positive even once during or after EGFR mAb. Clinical trial information: REMARRY: UMIN000036424 PURSUIT: jRCTs031190096.

Effects of Metastatic Sites on Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Low concordance between plasma-based and tissue-based tests for determining the RAS mutational status have been reported in some but not all patients with limited-extent metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In this study, we investigated the relationship between metastatic site and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection using ctDNA genotyping, an alternative to tissue genotyping for precision oncology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated the relationship between metastatic site and ctDNA detection using Guardant360, a next-generation sequencing ctDNA assay, in mCRC patients with single-organ metastasis in the SCRUM-Japan GOZILA study (UMIN000029315).

RESULTS

Of 1,187 patients with mCRC enrolled in GOZILA, 138 were eligible (49 with liver-only, 15 with lymph node-only, 27 with peritoneum-only, and 47 with lung-only metastases). The concordance of RAS/BRAF status between Guaradant360 and tissue in vitro diagnostic tests was 95.9% in patients with liver-only, 80.0% in lymph node-only, 56.0% in peritoneum-only, and 65.9% in lung-only metastases. ctDNA fraction, as measured by the median maximum variant allelic fraction (max VAF), and median number of detected variants were 23.1% and five in liver-only, 6.0% and five in lymph node-only, 0.4% and three in peritoneum-only, and 0.4% and three in lung-only metastases, respectively (all P < .001, Kruskal-Wallis test). Few patients with liver-only (2.0%) and lymph node-only metastasis (13.3%) had a max VAF < 0.2%, which is required to ensure a detection limit of 95%, but max VAF was more frequently < 0.2% in patients with lung-only (27.7%) or peritoneum-only metastasis (29.6%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with lung-only and peritoneum-only metastatic disease have significantly lower levels of ctDNA, suggesting decreased clinical sensitivity for subclonal variants. This observation suggests that such patients may benefit from concurrent tissue and plasma testing to provide optimal genotyping for subsequent therapy selection.

Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Lobectomy is the standard of care for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The survival and clinical benefits of segmentectomy have not been investigated in a randomised trial setting. We aimed to investigate if segmentectomy was non-inferior to lobectomy in patients with small-sized peripheral NSCLC.

METHODS

We conducted this randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial at 70 institutions in Japan. Patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC (tumour diameter ≤2 cm; consolidation-to-tumour ratio >0·5) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either lobectomy or segmentectomy. Randomisation was done via the minimisation method, with balancing for the institution, histological type, sex, age, and thin-section CT findings. Treatment allocation was not concealed from investigators and patients. The primary endpoint was overall survival for all randomly assigned patients. The secondary endpoints were postoperative respiratory function (6 months and 12 months), relapse-free survival, proportion of local relapse, adverse events, proportion of segmentectomy completion, duration of hospital stay, duration of chest tube placement, duration of surgery, amount of blood loss, and the number of automatic surgical staples used. Overall survival was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis with a non-inferiority margin of 1·54 for the upper limit of the 95% CI of the hazard ratio (HR) and estimated using a stratified Cox regression model. This study is registered with UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000002317.

FINDINGS

Between Aug, 10, 2009, and Oct 21, 2014, 1106 patients (intention-to-treat population) were enrolled to receive lobectomy (n=554) or segmentectomy (n=552). Patient baseline clinicopathological factors were well balanced between the groups. In the segmentectomy group, 22 patients were switched to lobectomies and one patient received wide wedge resection. At a median follow-up of 7·3 years (range 0·0-10·9), the 5-year overall survival was 94·3% (92·1-96·0) for segmentectomy and 91·1% for lobectomy (95% CI 88·4-93·2); superiority and non-inferiority in overall survival were confirmed using a stratified Cox regression model (HR 0·663; 95% CI 0·474-0·927; one-sided p<0·0001 for non-inferiority; p=0·0082 for superiority). Improved overall survival was observed consistently across all predefined subgroups in the segmentectomy group. At 1 year follow-up, the significant difference in the reduction of median forced expiratory volume in 1 sec between the two groups was 3·5% (p<0·0001), which did not reach the predefined threshold for clinical significance of 10%. The 5-year relapse-free survival was 88·0% (95% CI 85·0-90·4) for segmentectomy and 87·9% (84·8-90·3) for lobectomy (HR 0·998; 95% CI 0·753-1·323; p=0·9889). The proportions of patients with local relapse were 10·5% for segmentectomy and 5·4% for lobectomy (p=0·0018). 52 (63%) of 83 patients and 27 (47%) of 58 patients died of other diseases after lobectomy and segmentectomy, respectively. No 30-day or 90-day mortality was observed. One or more postoperative complications of grade 2 or worse occurred at similar frequencies in both groups (142 [26%] patients who received lobectomy, 148 [27%] who received segmentectomy).

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, this study was the first phase 3 trial to show the benefits of segmentectomy versus lobectomy in overall survival of patients with small-peripheral NSCLC. The findings suggest that segmentectomy should be the standard surgical procedure for this population of patients.

FUNDING

National Cancer Center Research and the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan.

Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy plus Nivolumab before Surgery in Patients with Microsatellite Stable and Microsatellite Instability-High Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgical resection are the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with radiation suggests a promising approach for enhancing efficacy. We investigated the efficacy of CRT followed by nivolumab and surgery in patients with LARC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In phase I, we investigated the feasibility of sequentially combined CRT, 5 cycles of nivolumab, and radical surgery. In phase II, patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) LARC were evaluated.

RESULTS

Three patients in phase I received full courses of CRT and nivolumab without dose modification; the schedule was recommended for phase II. A pathologic complete response (pCR) was centrally confirmed in 30% [11/37; 90% confidence interval (CI), 18%-44%] and 60% (3/5) of the MSS and exploratory MSI-H cohorts, respectively. While immune-related severe adverse events were observed in 3 patients, no treatment-related deaths were observed. In 38 patients with MSS who underwent surgery, pCR rates of 75% (6/8) and 17% (5/30; P = 0.004, Fisher exact test) were observed in those with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score ≥1% and <1%, respectively; IHC staining was performed using pre-CRT samples. In 24 patients with MSS, pre-CRT samples were analyzed by flow cytometry; pCR rates of 78% (7/9) and 13% (2/15; P = 0.003, Fisher exact test) were observed for CD8+ T cell/effector regulatory T cell (CD8/eTreg) ratios of ≥2.5 and <2.5, respectively, in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT followed by consolidation nivolumab could increase pCR. PD-L1 expression and an elevated CD8/eTreg ratio were positive predictors in patients with MSS LARC.

A pathologic method for extracting good prognosis group in triple negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

The area of residual tumor (ART) is a prognostic factor in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for lung, pancreatic, and rectal cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of ART as a method for predicting the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We included 143 patients with TNBC treated with NAC. The ART at the maximum cut surface of the residual tumor was measured. We divided the patients into three groups: ART-0 (ART=0 mm² ), ART-low (0 mm² < ART ≤ 136mm² ), and ART-high (ART > 136 mm² ), and compared their clinicopathological factors and prognosis. There were no significant differences in both recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between ART-0 and ART-low; however, the ART-high group had significantly shorter RFS and OS than the ART-0 and ART-low groups. Multivariate analysis showed that ART-0, and -low and ypN (-) were independent favorable prognostic factors for RFS. Groups with both ART-low and ypN(-) as well as those with ART-0 and ypN(-) showed significantly longer OS and RFS than the other groups (p<0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the RFS and OS between the ART-0 and ypN(-) groups and the ART-low and ypN(-) groups (p=0.249 and p=0.554, respectively). We concluded that ART is a candidate histopathological evaluation method for predicting the prognosis of TNBC patients treated with NAC. Furthermore, postoperative chemotherapy could be omitted in patients with ART-0 and ypN(-) (pathological complete response) and those with ART-low and ypN(-).

An open-label phase 2 study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment for patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (EPOC2001)

TPS372

Background: Lenvatinib, a multikinase inhibitor of VEGF receptors and other receptor tyrosine kinases, substantially decreased the tumor-associated macrophages and increased infiltration of CD8-positive T cells and enhanced anti-tumor activity of PD-1 inhibitors in vivo model. A phase 2 study demonstrated remarkable clinical activity of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for advanced gastric cancer with objective response rate of 69% (Kawazoe A, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020), leading to the global phase 3 LEAP-015 trial at first-line (NCT04662710). The objective of this study is to evaluate anti-tumor activity of lenvatinib with pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment for patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Methods: The study is an open-label, single-arm, single-center, phase 2 clinical trial. Eligible patients are with previously untreated gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma as defined by cT2-4 and/or cN+ without evidence of metastatic disease. Patients will receive 3 cycles of 20 mg oral lenvatinib daily plus 200 mg intravenous pembrolizumab every 3 weeks as the neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery, and then 3 cycles of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab followed by 11 cycles of pembrolizumab monotherapy as the adjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint is major pathological response rate, and the secondary endpoints are pathological complete response rate, tumor shrinkage effect on primary lesions, radical resection rate, treatment completion rate until surgery or adjuvant treatment, event-free survival, overall survival, and incidence of adverse events. We also investigate several biomarkers using pre- and post-treatment tumor and blood samples. First patient will be enrolled in November 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04745988.

Study protocol for JCOG1807C (DEEP OCEAN): a interventional prospective trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab before and after operation or durvalumab as maintenance therapy after chemoradiotherapy against superior sulcus non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Superior sulcus tumours (SSTs) are relatively uncommon and one of the most intractable lung cancers among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We planned a multicenter, single-arm confirmatory trial of new multidisciplinary treatment using immune-checkpoint inhibitor. The aim is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of new multidisciplinary treatment with perioperative durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Methods

The primary endpoint is 3-year overall survival. Patients receive induction CRT with sequential two courses of durvalumab, followed by surgical resection for resectable SST. The regimen for CRT is two courses of cisplatin and S-1, and concurrent radiotherapy (66 Gy/33 Fr). After surgery, 22 courses of post-operative durvalumab therapy are administered. For unresectable SST, an additional 22 courses of durvalumab are administered after induction durvalumab.

Results

In two cases as a safety cohort, the safety of intervention treatment up to 30 days after surgery was examined, and there were no special safety signals. Patient enrollment has now resumed in the main cohort.

Conclusions

The results of this study may contribute to the establishment of a new standard of care for SST, which is an intractable NSCLC.