12a Lymph Node Dissection Compliance Necessary in Patients Who Undergo D2 Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinomas? A Population-Based Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Study

LN dissection is essential for accurately staging and improving GC patient prognosis. However, the compliance rate for No. 12a LND in practice is low, and its necessity is controversial. Data from GC patients who underwent total gastrectomy (TG)/distal gastrectomy (DG) plus D2 lymphadenectomy between January 2000 and December 2017 at West China Hospital, Sichuan University were reviewed. No. 12a LND noncompliance's effect on the long-term prognosis of patients with GC after D2 gastrectomy was explored. Of the 2788 patients included, No. 12a LND noncompliance occurred in 1753 patients (62.9%). Among 1035 patients with assessable LNs from station 12a, 98 (9.5%) had positive LNs detected at station 12a. No. 12a LN metastasis patients (stage IV not included) had significantly better overall survival (OS) than TNM stage IV patients (p = 0.006). Patients with No. 12a LND compliance had a significantly higher OS than those without, both before (p < 0.001) and after (p < 0.001) PSM. Cox multivariate analysis confirmed that No. 12a LND noncompliance was an independent prognostic factor before (HR 1.323, 95% CI 1.171-1.496, p < 0.001) and after (HR 1.353, 95% CI 1.173-1.560, p < 0.001) PSM. In conclusion, noncompliance with No. 12a LND compromised the long-term survival of patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy for GC.

Intra-abdominal fat volume estimation by multi-detector rows computed tomography: relevance in surgical fellowship training program in Shanghai: a retrospective study

Background

Intra-abdominal fat volume (IFV) has been shown to have a negative impact on surgical outcomes in gastric cancer (GC) and other gastrointestinal surgeries. The purpose of this study is to look into the relationship between IFV and perioperative outcomes in GC patients using multi-detector rows computed tomography (MDCT) and assess the importance of implementing this observation in current surgical fellowship training programs.

Methods

Patients with GC who underwent open D2 gastrectomy between May 2015 and September 2017 were included in the study. Based on MDCT estimation, patients were divided into high IFV (IFV ≥ 3,000 ml) and low IFV (IFV < 3,000 ml) groups. Perioperative outcomes for cancer staging, type of gastrectomy, intraoperative blood loss (IBL), anastomotic leakage, and hospital stay were compared between the two groups. This study was registered as CTR2200059886.

Results

Out of 226 patients, 54 had early gastric carcinoma (EGC), while 172 had advanced gastric carcinoma (AGC). There were 64 patients in the high IFV group and 162 in the low IFV group. The high IFV group had significantly higher IBL mean values (p = 0.008). Therefore, having a high IFV was a risk factor for the occurrence of perioperative complications (p = 0.008).

Conclusions

High IFV estimated by MDCT prior to GC surgery was associated with increased IBL and postoperative complications. Incorporating this CT-IFV estimation into surgical fellowship programs may aid aspiring surgeons in selecting patients during independent practice in their learning curve and surgical practice for the most appropriate approach for treating GC patients.

A new scoring system to evaluate adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with T2N0M0 gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

At present, there is insufficient medical evidence to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for T2N0M0 gastric cancer.

AIM

To obtain a risk score to assess the need for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T2N0M0 gastric cancer.

METHODS

We identified 325 patients with pathological T2N0M0 stage primary gastric cancer at the National Cancer Center between 2011 and 2018. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to predict factors affecting prognosis. Vascular invasion, tumor site, and body mass index were assessed, and a scoring system was established. We compared the survival outcomes and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy between the different subgroups.

RESULTS

Five-year survival rates of the score 0, 1, 2, and 3 groups were 92%, 95%, 80%, and 50%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the score 2-3 group, five-year survival rates for patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy group and postoperative observation group were 95% and 61%, respectively (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

For patients with T2N0M0 stage gastric cancer and two or more risk factors, adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy may have a survival benefit.

Operative and Oncological Outcomes After D2 Versus D1 Gastrectomy of Operable Gastric Cancer: an Observational Study

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgery for operable gastric carcinoma is still controversial. The aim of the current study was to assess the outcomes of D2 compared with D1 gastrectomy.

STUDY

This observational study included 80 patients with operable gastric cancer treated by D2 gastrectomy at Alexandria University Hospital between January 2010 and January 2016. Another 68 patients treated by D1 gastrectomy during the same period were included. Both groups were compared regarding operative mortality, morbidities, tumor recurrence, and 5-year survival rates.

RESULTS

D2 gastrectomy had a significantly higher postoperative mortality and morbidity rates compared with D1 group (19.4% and 41.9% versus 6.3% and 18.8%). Mean number of LNs retrieved was statistically increased in D2 compared with D1 group with more frequency of adequate lymphadenectomy (LN retrieved > 15). D2 gastrectomy demonstrated significant lower recurrence and cancer-specific mortality rates compared with D1 group (18.6% and 14.5% versus 34.9% and 30.8%) with no significant difference in DFS and OS rates. Spleen-saving D2 gastrectomy showed no significant difference in early postoperative mortality with significant increase in DFS and OS compared with D1 gastrectomy (78.7% and 82% versus 61.5% and 64.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

D2 gastrectomy had a lower recurrence and cancer-specific mortality rates than D1 gastrectomy but it had higher postoperative mortality and morbidity rates that resulted in no overall survival benefit of D2 compared with D1 gastrectomy. Spleen-saving D2 gastrectomy can be done safely in selected patients by expert surgeons without increased morbidity and mortality and better survival outcomes.

Oncologic Benefit of Adjuvant Chemoradiation after D2 Gastrectomy: A Stepwise Hierarchical Pooled Analysis and Systematic Review

Our study aimed to evaluate the benefits of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after D2 gastrectomy, as compared to adjuvant chemotherapy, alone. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. We applied stepwise analyses that enabled the evaluation of data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), balanced studies, and all studies separately and in a hierarchical manner. Thirteen controlled studies, including six RCTs involving 2603 patients, were included. Overall pooled analysis revealed a disease-free survival benefit of CRT (odds ratio (OR): 1.264, p = 0.053), which was more evident in the subgroup analysis of RCTs (OR: 1.440, p = 0.006) and balanced studies (OR: 1.417, p < 0.001). Overall survival was insignificantly different in the overall pooled analysis (OR: 1.124, p = 0.347). However, the difference was marginally significant in the subgroup analysis of balanced studies (OR: 1.279, p = 0.055) and significant in the subgroup analysis of studies involving stage ≥III patients only (OR: 1.663, p = 0.005). Locoregional recurrence (LRR) reduction was noted in the overall pooled analysis (OR: 0.559, p = 0.012; pooled rate: 11.3% vs. 18.1%) and was more robust in the subgroup analyses. Grade ≥3 leukopenia was higher in the CRT arm (OR: 1.387, p = 0.004; pooled rate: 26.4% vs. 15.7%). CRT after D2 gastrectomy should be applied for patients with high risk of LRR (e.g., stage ≥ III), along with efforts to reduce leukopenia.

Recurrence outcome of lymph node ratio in gastric cancer after underwent curative resection: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

D2 dissection has been regarded as the standard procedure for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). Number of lymph nodes (LN) harvested is an important factor for accurate staging. The number of LN retrieved and the metastasis LN status are also important factors to determine the prognosis. This study aims to evaluate whether lymph node ratio (LNR) could be a prognostic indicator of GC patients following curative resection.

Patients and methods

Single center retrospective cohort study of GC patients underwent curative resection from January 1995 to December 2016 was conducted. The patients were categorized into 3 groups based on LNR (0.00-0.35, >0.35-0.75, and >0.75-1.00) and 2 groups based on number of LN retrieved (<15 and ≥ 15). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate recurrence-free survival. Cox-regression were used to determine the association between LNR/other factors and the disease recurrence.

Results

One-hundred fifty-three patients were included in analysis. Univariate analysis showed that LNR >0.35, pathologic LN stages (pN) 2-3, higher number of LN metastasis, and TNM stage III were significantly recurrence risk factors. After adjusting for several covariates, LNR >0.35 still was significant predictor (adjusted HR [95%CI], 8.53 [1.97, 36.86]; p = 0.004) while number of LN retrieved or number of metastasis LN were not.

Conclusion

LNR could be a strong indicator for the recurrence of GC after curative resection while the number of LN retrieved or metastasis did not predict the recurrence. Future studies, such as prospective studies, are needed to confirm and identify the optimum LNR cut-off.

Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Case-Matched Comparative Study

Background: The role of the laparoscopic approach to D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the operative and short-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resections. Methods: Patients who underwent potentially curative D2 gastrectomy between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were randomly matched on 1:1 basis for age and extent of surgery (total versus subtotal gastrectomy, and additional organ resection). Exclusions included emergency or palliative surgery. The learning curve for laparoscopic resections was included. Analysis was conducted on intention to treat basis. The outcomes were reported as median (range) or per cent as appropriate. Results: Among 78 patients who had undergone potentially curative gastrectomy 36 were matched. The groups were comparable for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, preoperative serum albumin and hemoglobin, body mass index, frequency of previous abdominal surgery, anatomic distribution of disease, extent of gastrectomy, need for additional resection, and disease stage. There was one conversion to open surgery. Although laparoscopic surgery required longer operating time (393 versus 218 minutes, P < .001), it was associated with less blood loss (100 versus 200 mL, P = .001) and shorter hospital stay (3.0 versus 7.5 days, P < .001). There were no significant differences in the rates of clinically significant complications, mortality, readmissions, reoperations, lymph node retrieval, and R₁ resections. Conclusions: The laparoscopic approach to potentially curative D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer is associated with less operative trauma and quicker recovery while offering an equivalent oncologic resection.

Perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in Japan: current and future perspectives

The standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer differs across the world. In western countries, perioperative chemotherapy or postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy are the preferred treatment options, whereas in Asia, D2 gastrectomy followed by postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is standard. In Japan, adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 is the standard treatment for pStage II gastric cancer, whereas adjuvant chemotherapy with a doublet regimen is preferred for pStage III gastric cancer. The efficacy of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy using S-1 plus cisplatin, has been investigated in selected patients with expected poor survival outcomes. To expand the indications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a clinical trial investigating the efficacy of preoperative S-1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with cStage III (cT3-4N1-3) gastric cancer (JCOG1509) is ongoing in Japan. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to cytotoxic chemotherapy also seems promising and is being investigated in international randomized clinical trials. Although we have to await the final results of these studies, preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising treatment strategy and likely to become standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer in Japan.

Ten-year survival outcomes of patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer: impact of clinicopathologic and treatment-related risk factors

BACKGROUND

Despite therapeutic advancements, gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of death worldwide.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study statistically analyzed the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with potentially resectable GC managed at our institution between 2006 and 2010. The STROBE checklist was applied.

RESULTS

Preoperative assessment of 164 GC patients (male: female ratio 1.87, median age 65 years) assigned 132 (80.5%) to total (56; 42.4%) or subtotal (76; 57.6%) gastrectomy. Resection margins were microscopically tumor-free (R0) in 100 (75.8%), microscopically infiltrated (R1) in 25 (18.9%) and macroscopically infiltrated (R2) in 7 (5.3%) patients. Nodal plane dissection was D0 in 34 (25.8%), D1 in 62 (47.0%) and D2 in 36 (27.3%) patients. Early GC was diagnosed in 19 patients (14.4%). Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy was administered in 69.7% and chemoradiation in 18.2% of patients. The 5- and 10-year survival rates of patients with R0 resection were 74% and 65.4%, respectively. The 2-year survival rates for R1 and R2 resection were 28.9% and 0% respectively. The 5- and 10-year survival rates according to nodal plane dissection were 55.6% and 41.4% for D2, and 53.2% and 49.7% for D1, respectively. On multivariate analysis, T4, N3 and R1/R2 remained independent negative prognostic factors for overall survival. Microscopic or macroscopic infiltration of surgical margins was the worst adverse prognostic factor for survival.

CONCLUSION

These results are equivalent to those from centers of excellence and indicate the urgent need for improvements in the field, particularly in the development of predictive models to guide personalized therapy.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin improves survival of patients with gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy: A multicenter propensity score-matched study

AIM

To investigate the safety and efficacy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) as an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in gastric cancer (GC) after D2 dissection.

METHODS

GC Patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy from September 2009 to December 2011 in four Chinese institutions were enrolled. Patients with stage IB-IIIC GC, who received adjuvant SOX treatment were matched by propensity scores with those who underwent surgery alone and those who conducted capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) regimen. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared among the groups. In addition, adverse events in SOX patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 1944 GC patients who underwent D2 dissection, 867 were included for analysis. One hundred and seventeen patients treated with SOX were matched to 234 patients who conducted surgery alone. Fifty-seven patients treated with SOX were matched to 57 patients who received XELOX. The estimated five-year DFS was 57.5% in the adjuvant SOX group which was higher than that (44.6%) in the surgery alone group (P = 0.001); and the estimated five-year OS was 68.3% which was higher than that (45.8%) of surgery alone group (P < 0.001). Survival benefit was also revealed in stage III and > 60 years old subgroups (P < 0.001 and P = 0.015, respectively). Compared with XELOX regimen, SOX showed no significant difference in DFS (P = 0.340) and OS (P = 0.361). The most common ≥ 3 grade adverse events of SOX regimen were neutropenia (22.6%), leukopenia (8.9%) and thrombocytopenia (5.6%).

CONCLUSION

Compared with surgery alone, SOX regimen significantly improves the long-term survival and has acceptable toxicity in patients with stage IB-IIIC GC after D2 dissection. It may be a novel adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in GC patients.

After neoadjuvant chemotherapy platelet/lymphocyte ratios negatively correlate with prognosis in gastric cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Circulating predictors prognostic factors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which identify the patients who are potential possibly to benefit from it are limited at present. In this research, we aimed to compare the prognostic significance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with locally advance gastric carcinoma who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by D2 gastrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2007 to 2015, 91 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer treated with NAC followed by D2 gastrectomy included in this retrospective cohort study. The correlation of clinical data, including tumor regression, response evaluation, tumor location, pathological type, systemic therapy, tumor size (cm), neural invasion, lymphatic-vascular invasion, ypTNM stage, and survival prognosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

Platelet/lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in gastric cancer patients were higher than in matched normal volunteers. PLR levels higher after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are associated with worse OS. Multivariate Cox proportional analysis showed that pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy PLR was an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy PLR may be a feasible biomarker for survival prognosis in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. PLR and NLR were reduced after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, PLR level was negatively correlated with survival prognosis.

Universalization of the operative strategy by systematic mesogastric excision for stomach cancer with that for total mesorectal excision and complete mesocolic excision colorectal counterparts

Gastrointestinal cancer surgery aims at en bloc removal of the primary tumor with its lymphatic drainage by excising organ-specific mesentery as an "intact package". This concept was advocated in colorectal cancer surgery as total mesorectal excision (TME) or complete mesocolic excision (CME) procedures, but is not directly applicable to stomach cancer as a result of the morphological complexities of the gastric mesentery. In this review, we discuss the unique anatomical features of the mesogastrium by introducing its embryology, disclose its similarity to the mesosigmoid, and then propose a theoretical concept to mesentery-based D2 gastrectomy, namely systematic mesogastric excision, which can universalize the operative strategy of stomach cancer with that of TME and CME colorectal counterparts.

Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Following D2 Gastrectomy-an Audit of 456 Cases

BACKGROUND

D2 gastrectomy is routinely performed in Japanese centres for carcinoma stomach with low morbidity and mortality. There were concerns in Western centres with regard to D2 gastrectomy in view of high morbidity and mortality rates. This study was aimed to study the postoperative morbidity and mortality following D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma stomach in a high volume centre in India.

METHODS

It was a retrospective analysis of all the patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy from 1991 to 2010.

RESULTS

D2 gastrectomy was performed in 456 patients during this period. Respiratory events were the most common cause of morbidity in the study group (2.4 %). Male gender (p = 0.007), presence of gastric outlet obstruction (p = 0.01) and pathological T4 (p = 0.05) independently predicted increased post operative morbidity in multivariate analysis. The morbidity and mortality rates declined with increase in hospital volume and experience of the surgeon.

CONCLUSION

D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma stomach can be performed safely in specialized centres with low morbidity and mortality rates.

Clinical study of harvesting lymph nodes with carbon nanoparticles in advanced gastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial

Background

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficiency and safety of carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) for harvesting lymph nodes (LNs) in cases of advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Methods

Patients with previously untreated resectable AGC were eligible for inclusion in this study. All patients were randomly allocated to two subgroups. In the experimental group, 1.0 mL of CNP was injected into the subserosa of the stomach around the tumor before gastrectomy with D2 dissection. The same procedure was performed directly without any coloring material in the control arm. Following surgery, LNs were harvested, colored LNs were counted, and the diameters were measured by the investigator and pathologist.

Results

Thirty patients were enrolled in the study. We observed no serious adverse effects related to CNP injection. The rate of stained LNs was 46.6 %. The mean number of harvested LNs was larger in the experimental than in the control group (38.33 vs 28.27, p = 0.041). A smaller diameter of LNs was recorded in the experimental arm (3.32 vs 4.30 mm, p = 0.023). In addition, we developed a model for predicting the total number of LNs based on the data from CNP-stained LNs and metastatic LNs (MLNs).

Conclusions

CNP is a safe material. Surgeons could harvest more LNs in patients with AGC. The harvest of an increased number of smaller diameters of LNs may be beneficial. Further study is warranted to demonstrate the model’s practicality.

Gastric cancer: Current status of lymph node dissection

D2 procedure has been accepted in Far East as the standard treatment for both early (EGC) and advanced gastric cancer (AGC) for many decades. Recently EGC has been successfully treated with endoscopy by endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection, when restricted or extended Gotoda's criteria can be applied and D1+ surgery is offered only to patients not fitted for less invasive treatment. Furthermore, two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been demonstrating the non inferiority of minimally invasive technique as compared to standard open surgery for the treatment of early cases and recently the feasibility of adequate D1+ dissection has been demonstrated also for the robot assisted technique. In case of AGC the debate on the extent of nodal dissection has been open for many decades. While D2 gastrectomy was performed as the standard procedure in eastern countries, mostly based on observational and retrospective studies, in the west the Medical Research Council (MRC), Dutch and Italian RCTs have been conducted to show a survival benefit of D2 over D1 with evidence based medicine. Unfortunately both the MRC and the Dutch trials failed to show a survival benefit after the D2 procedure, mostly due to the significant increase of postoperative morbidity and mortality, which was referred to splenopancreatectomy. Only 15 years after the conclusion of its accrual, the Dutch trial could report a significant decrease of recurrence after D2 procedure. Recently the long term survival analysis of the Italian RCT could demonstrate a benefit for patients with positive nodes treated with D2 gastrectomy without splenopancreatectomy. As nowadays also in western countries D2 procedure can be done safely with pancreas preserving technique and without preventive splenectomy, it has been suggested in several national guidelines as the recommended procedure for patients with AGC.

A phase II study of adjuvant S-1/cisplatin chemotherapy followed by S-1-based chemoradiotherapy for D2-resected gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Surgery is the only possible curative treatment for gastric cancer. However, the high recurrence rate makes gastric cancer difficult to cure by surgery alone. The present study was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes and toxicity of adjuvant treatment, including S-1/cisplatin chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy with concurrent S-1.

METHODS

Patients with radically D2-resected adenocarcinoma of the stomach of stage IB-IV (M0) were eligible. Patients were treated with S-1 (40-60 mg depending on the patient's body surface area) twice daily for 3 weeks and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) intravenously on day 1 every 5 weeks. Patients received CRT (45 Gy of radiation at 1.8 Gy/day, 5 days per week, for 5 weeks with the same dose of S-1 during radiation) followed by two additional cycles of S-1/cisplatin. The primary endpoint was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate; the secondary endpoints were the 3-year overall survival rate and toxicities.

RESULTS

Until May 2012, 46 patients were enrolled, and 34 (73.9%) completed the planned treatment. The median age was 53 years (range: 31-69 years), and the numbers of patients with stage IB, II, III and IV disease were 0, 17, 25 and 4, respectively. Main grade 3-4 toxicities were as follows: neutropenia (28.2%), nausea (17.4%), vomiting (8.7%) and anorexia (15.2%). At the time of analysis, after a median follow-up period of 56.5 months (3.03-74.0 months), 16 recurrence events and 15 deaths were reported. The estimated 3-year DFS and survival rates were 65.2 and 76.1%, respectively. The most common site of recurrence was the peritoneum (n = 12).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this phase II study show that intensified adjuvant treatment with S-1/cisplatin chemotherapy and S-1-based chemoradiotherapy was tolerable and effective in reducing disease recurrence. The addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy may be effective in D2-resected gastric cancer. Although the data here are promising, a randomized trial is needed between patients treated with the current regimen and an appropriate comparator arm.

Role of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in suprapancreatic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1547-1552. [PMID: 26169636 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4372-x]

PURPOSE

Despite theoretical advantages, no clear benefit was proven for initial application of robotic surgery for gastric cancer so far. The aim of this analysis was to examine the role of robotic surgery regarding nodal dissection technically demanding areas compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

This analysis included 87 patients who underwent robot-assisted distal gastrectomy (RADG) and 288 patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) at the National Cancer Center, Korea, between February 2009 and September 2011. Clinicopathologic data, surgery-related data, postoperative morbidity, and pathologic data for each nodal station were analyzed.

RESULTS

Time to flatulence was 3.5 ± 0.8 days for RADG and 3.8 ± 0.8 days for LADG (P = 0.01). Postoperative hospital stay was 6.7 ± 1.0 days in RADG and 7.4 ± 2.4 days in LADG (P < 0.001).The number of dissected lymph nodes was 37.1 ± 12.9 in the RADG group and 34.1 ± 12.1 in the LADG group (P = 0.044). In patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy, the number of dissected lymph nodes in the N2 area was 16.3 ± 7.7 for RADG and 13.2 ± 5.3 for LADG (P = 0.001). The number of dissected lymph nodes around the splenic artery area was 2.9 ± 2.9 in RADG and 2.2 ± 2.0 in LADG (P = 0.04). Regarding postoperative complications, there was no statistically significant difference [five patients (5.7%) in RADG and 26 patients (9%) in LADG) (P = 0.330)].

CONCLUSION

RADG could provide an advantage over LADG in the dissection of the N2 area lymph nodes, especially around the splenic artery area.

Prolonged adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy improved survival of stage IIIA gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy

GOALS

This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of prolonged adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy on survival of gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND

Inadequate evidence is available on optimal duration of chemotherapy and the number of administered cycles is generally based on patient responsiveness and individual tolerability as well as physician preferences.

STUDY

We randomly assigned 307 gastric cancer patients after D2 gastrectomy between January 2006 and December 2010 to XELOX group and Prolonged group. XELOX consisted of a 2-h intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin 130mg/mg on day 1 and oral capecitabine 1000mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle for eight cycles in half a year. In Prolonged group, patients underwent extra oral capecitabine 1000mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle for eight cycles after eight cycles of XELOX. The disease-free survival and overall survival were compared.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in 3-year disease-free survival (Prolonged group 56.6%, XELOX group 48.4%, P=0.0357). Subgroup analysis by TNM staging showed that patients with stage IIIA gastric cancer in the Prolonged group had significantly higher DFS (50.00% vs 40.96, P=0.0178) and OS (71.95% vs 57.83, P=0.0230) than that of patients in the XELOX group. No grade 4 adverse effects or treatment-related deaths were reported. More patients in the Prolonged group experienced hand-foot syndrome than in the XELOX group.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged capecitabine chemotherapy prevents improves the prognosis of patients with stage IIIA gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by D2 gastrectomy in locally advanced gastric cancer

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for resectability of locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).

METHODS: Between November 2007 and January 2014, 29 patients with LAGC (clinically T3 with distal esophagus invasion/T4 or bulky regional node metastasis) that were treated with NACRT followed by D2 gastrectomy were included in this study. Resectability was evaluated with radiologic and endoscopic exams before and after NACRT. Using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, patients received 45 Gy, with a daily dose of 1.8 Gy. The entire tumor extent and the regional metastatic lymph nodes were included in the gross tumor volume. Patients presenting with a resectable tumor after NACRT received a total or subtotal gastrectomy with D2 dissection. The pathologic tumor response was evaluated using Japanese Gastric Cancer Association histologic evaluation criteria. Postoperative morbidity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were estimated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS: All patients were assessed as unresectable cases. Twenty-four patients (24/29; 82.8%) showed LAGC on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced CT, whereas four patients (4/29; 13.8%) with vague invasion or abutment to an adjacent organ underwent diagnostic laparoscopy. One patient (1/29; 3.4%), initially assessed as a resectable case, underwent an “open and closure” after the tumor was found to be unresectable. Abutment to an adjacent organ (34.5%) was the most common reason for NACRT. The clinical response rate one month after NACRT was 44.8%. After NACRT, 69% (20/29) of patients had a resectable tumor. Of the 20 patients with a resectable tumor, 18 patients (62.1%) underwent a D2 gastrectomy. The R0 resection rate was 94.4% and two patients (2/18; 11.1%) showed a complete response. The median follow-up duration was 13.5 mo. The one-year OS and PFS rates were 72.4 and 48.9%, respectively. The one-year OS, PFS, local failure-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival were higher in patients with a resectable tumor after NACRT (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.078, respectively). No grade 3-4 late treatment-related toxicities or postoperative mortalities were observed.

CONCLUSION: NACRT with D2 gastrectomy showed a high rate of R0 resection and promising local control, which may increase the R0 resection opportunity resulting in survival benefit.

Routine modified D2 lymphadenectomy performance in pT1-T2N0 gastric cancer

AIM: To evaluate routine modified D2 lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer, based on immunohistochemically detected skip micrometastases in level II lymph nodes.

METHODS: Among 95 gastric cancer patients who were routinely submitted to curative modified D2 lymphadenectomy, from January 2004 to December 2008, 32 were classified as pN0. All level I lymph nodes of these 32 patients were submitted to immunohistochemistry for micrometastases detection. Patients in whom micrometastases were detected in the level I lymph node stations (n = 4) were excluded from further analysis. The level II lymph nodes of the remaining 28 patients were studied immunohistochemically for micrometastases detection and constitute the material of the present study.

RESULTS: Skip micrometastases in the level II lymph nodes were detected in 14% (4 out of 28) of the patients. The incidence was further increased to 17% (4 out of 24) in the subgroup of T1-2 gastric cancer patients. All micrometastases were detected in the No. 7 lymph node station. Thus, the disease was upstaged from stage IA to IB in one patient and from stage IB to II in three patients.

CONCLUSION: In gastric cancer, true R0 resection may not be achieved without modified D2 lymphadenectomy. Until D2+/D3 lymphadenectomy becomes standard, modified D2 lymphadenectomy should be performed routinely.