Association study of transition of laboratory marker levels and transition of disease activity of atopic dermatitis patients treated with dupilumab

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks signalling pathways of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, is effective in treating patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). We previously showed that transitions of serum thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) levels and eosinophil numbers were strongly associated with that of AD activity and that the transitions of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were weakly and not associated with that of AD activity, respectively, in patients treated without dupilumab.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to elucidate whether the association of the transition of laboratory marker levels and transition of disease activity in dupilumab-treated AD patients (present study) was different from that in patients who are not treated with dupilumab (previous study).

METHODS

Sixty AD outpatients treated with dupilumab were included in this study. Associations between the transition of the eczema area and severity index (EASI) score and those of above-mentioned laboratory marker levels were evaluated using a mixed effects model of EASI as the response variable, laboratory markers as fixed effects and patients as random effects.

RESULTS

The transitions of serum TARC and LDH levels were associated strongly with that of AD activity, but the transitions of serum IgE level and eosinophil numbers were associated with that of AD activity intermediately and weakly, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratory markers are useful for evaluating the effects of treatments for AD, but the meaning of each laboratory marker depends on the drugs used for treatment.

Serum interleukin-18 provides a clue to the diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease: findings from 6 Japanese patients with adult-onset Still's disease

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a systemic autoinflammatory disorder accompanied by skin eruption. However, typical skin eruptions, such as evanescent, salmon-pink erythema, are not specific to AOSD and dermatologists often face difficulty in diagnosing AOSD. Interleukin-18 (IL-18) is believed to be the initiating factor of the inflammatory cascade in AOSD and overproduction of IL-18 contributes to the development of systemic autoinflammatory reactions. Therefore, we examined serum IL-18 levels in the active and inactive phase of 6 Japanese patients with AOSD who visited our dermatology clinic over the past 10 years and compared with other markers, including IL-6, ferritin and C-reactive protein.

Maculopapular Drug Eruption Caused by Apalutamide: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Apalutamide, an oral androgen receptor signaling inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and metastatic prostate cancer. In the international randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials, apalutamide was associated with a higher rate of rash than placebo. However, given that reports from a dermatological perspective are limited, the skin manifestations and histopathology of the skin lesions caused by apalutamide are largely unknown. Here, we report a case of apalutamide-induced drug eruption. A 66-year-old man developed itchy maculopapular erythema on the trunk and extremities 10 weeks after starting apalutamide for progressive prostate cancer. A biopsy specimen showed interface dermatitis with perivascular lymphocytic infiltration in the upper dermis. The lymphocyte transformation test was positive for apalutamide. The skin manifestations improved after discontinuation of apalutamide and treatment with topical corticosteroids and systemic prednisolone. A review of the dermatology literature on apalutamide-induced drug eruption yielded only six cases, including our case. Dermatologically, there were four cases of maculopapular rash and two of toxic epidermal necrolysis and histopathologically, there were three cases of interface dermatitis, two of epidermal necrosis, and one of spongiotic dermatitis. Four patients had peripheral eosinophilia. A lymphocyte transformation test was performed in three cases and was positive for apalutamide in all cases. Except for the two cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, which were fatal, the skin eruptions appeared 10 weeks after starting apalutamide. Considering the increasing number of patients with prostate cancer being treated with apalutamide, cases of apalutamide-induced drug eruption need to be accumulated and analyzed.

Enhancement of ultraviolet B-induced apoptosis and elimination of DNA damage by pre-irradiation with infrared radiation A does not depend on DNA damage repair

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that pre-irradiation with infrared radiation A (IRA) eliminated ultraviolet B (UVB) -induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs). Accelerated elimination of CPDs could have resulted from enhanced DNA repair and/or enhanced induction of apoptosis. In this study, we examined whether IRA accelerated the elimination of CPDs by enhancing DNA repair, using Xpa knockout (KO) mice, which were deficient in DNA repair.

METHODS

We have already generated mice harboring epidermal melanocytes that produce only eumelanin and dominant pheomelanin, and no melanin. To obtain such mice but with impaired DNA repair ability, we backcrossed these mice with Xpa KO mice. Three hours before UVB irradiation, the mice were irradiated with IRA, and CPDs and apoptotic cells were examined.

RESULTS

Pre-irradiation of Xpa KO mice with IRA before UVB irradiation could accelerate the removal of CPDs and enhance apoptotic changes.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the enhancement of UVB-induced apoptosis and acceleration of removal of CPDs by pre-irradiation with IRA does not depend on DNA damage repair.

Difamilast ointment, a selective phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in paediatric patients with atopic dermatitis: A phase 3 randomised double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial

Background

In atopic dermatitis (AD), phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibition reduces proinflammatory mediators and cytokines. Difamilast is a new selective PDE4 inhibitor.

Objectives

To demonstrate the superiority of topical difamilast to vehicle in Japanese paediatric patients with AD.

Methods

This was a phase III randomized, double‐blind, vehicle‐controlled trial. Patients aged 2–14 years with an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 2 or 3 received difamilast 0·3% (n = 83), difamilast 1% (n = 85) or vehicle (n = 83) ointment twice daily for 4 weeks.

Results

The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with an IGA score of 0 or 1 with improvement by at least two grades at week 4. The success rates in IGA score at week 4 were 44·6%, 47·1% and 18·1% in the difamilast 0·3%, difamilast 1% and vehicle groups, respectively. Both difamilast groups demonstrated significantly higher success rates in IGA score compared with vehicle at week 4 [difamilast 0·3% (P < 0·001); difamilast 1% (P < 0·001)]. Regarding secondary endpoints, improvements in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI; improvement of ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and ≥ 90% in overall score) at week 4 were significantly higher in patients in the difamilast 0·3% and 1% groups than those in the vehicle group. EASI score in the difamilast 0·3% and 1% groups was significantly reduced compared with that of patients in the vehicle group at week 1. The significant difference between both the difamilast groups and the vehicle groups was maintained from week 1 through to week 4. Most treatment‐emergent adverse events were mild or moderate, and no serious events or deaths were reported.

Conclusions

Difamilast 0·3% and 1% ointments are superior to vehicle and well tolerated in Japanese paediatric patients with AD.

Contact Dermatitis Caused by Efinaconazole and Luliconazole

We report a case of contact dermatitis caused by both efinaconazole, a topical triazole antifungal drug, and luliconazole, a topical imidazole antifungal drug. Positive patch test reactions were observed with efinaconazole and luliconazole. A patch test with lanoconazole also elicited a positive reaction. We hypothesized that structural similarity between luliconazole and lanoconazole led to cross-reaction, and that the dithiolane ring common to both drugs or the structure of the vinyl imidazole with a dithiolane ring could be the antigenic determinant. Since efinaconazole and luliconazole have no common structures, patients could be sensitized to both drugs separately. The antigenic determinant of efinaconazole is unknown. However, the chemical formula of ravuconazole, an oral triazole antifungal drug, is similar to that of efinaconazole. Clinicians should carefully consider potential cross-reactivity between these drugs.

Nutrition and Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic eczematous disease characterized by T helper 2 (Th2) -shifted allergic immunity, skin barrier impairment, and pruritus. Oral intake of certain nutrients might help regulate AD. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are often low in patients with AD, and oral vitamin D supplementation improves AD. Vitamin D increases regulatory T (Treg) cells, which promote tolerance to allergens and prevent allergic inflammation by inducing expression of filaggrin and cathelicidin in keratinocytes. Vitamin A strengthens Treg cells by inducing expression of forkhead box P3 and inhibits mediator release from mast cells and eosinophils. Serum levels of γ-linolenic acid and its metabolite, dihomo-γ-linolenic acid, are low in patients with AD, and oral γ-linolenic acid improves AD through anti-inflammatory prostaglandin D₁ and E₁ derived from dihomo-γ-linolenic acid. Eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid ameliorate AD by suppressing production of leukotriene B₄, increasing ceramides in the stratum corneum, and through their metabolites, resolvin E1 and D1, which resolve inflammation. The probiotics Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria improve the intestinal permeability barrier and induce Treg cells. Zinc levels in serum, hair, and erythrocytes are diminished in patients with AD. Zinc induces forkhead box P3 expression and increases Treg cells, and zinc-finger protein A20 suppresses nuclear factor-κB-dependent expression of inflammatory cytokines and cell-adhesion molecules. Oral supplementation of the above nutrients might have therapeutic or preventive roles in AD.

A case of IgA vasculitis with necrotizing arteritis in a 13-year-old girl

IgA vasculitis (IgAV) is the most frequent form of vasculitis in childhood which classically presents with purpura of the lower extremities, joint pain or swelling and abdominal pain. Though it is a self-limiting disease, and its prognosis is generally good, glomerulonephritis is one of the most important complications. IgAV is classified as a small vessel vasculitis, and though glomerulonephritis develops in IgAV, necrotizing arteritis is rarely seen. Here, we present a case of a 13-year-old girl with IgAV, glomerulonephritis, and necrotizing arteritis in the small renal arteries. There have been only a few reports of adult cases of IgAV with necrotizing arteritis in the kidneys, but there have been no pediatric cases. Some previous reports showed a high mortality rate and implied the possibility of overlap with other vasculitides. In the current report, a rare case of IgAV is described which exhibited necrotizing arteritis rather than overlap with another vasculitis, with a relatively typical clinical course for IgAV and laboratory tests.

Delgocitinib ointment in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study and a subsequent open-label, long-term study

BACKGROUND

Delgocitinib 0.5% ointment, a topical Janus kinase inhibitor, has been approved in Japan for adult patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of delgocitinib ointment in pediatric patients with AD.

METHODS

Part 1 of this study was a 4-week double-blind period in which Japanese patients aged 2 through 15 years were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to delgocitinib 0.25% ointment or vehicle ointment. Part 2 was a 52-week extension period. Eligible patients entered part 2 to receive 0.25% or 0.5% delgocitinib ointment.

RESULTS

At the initiation of the study, approximately half of the patients had moderate AD. At the end of treatment in part 1, the least-squares mean percent change from baseline in modified Eczema Area and Severity Index score, the primary efficacy endpoint, was significantly greater for delgocitinib ointment than for vehicle (-39.3% vs +10.9%, P < .001). In part 2, improvements in AD were also seen through week 56. Most adverse events were mild and unrelated to delgocitinib across the study periods.

LIMITATIONS

Only Japanese patients were included. In part 2, no control group was included and rescue therapy was allowed.

CONCLUSION

Delgocitinib ointment was effective and well tolerated when applied to Japanese pediatric patients with AD for up to 56 weeks.

Efficacy of a moisturizer for pruritus accompanied by xerosis in patients undergoing dialysis: A multicenter, open-label, randomized verification study

Xerosis and pruritus are common in patients undergoing dialysis. These symptoms are treated with moisturizers, but limited evidence supports the efficacy of such treatment. Our exploratory study suggested the effectiveness of a heparinoid‐containing product for xerosis in dialysis patients. We conducted a multicenter, open‐label, randomized, before‐after, parallel‐group comparative study to verify the exploratory study results (Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000029360). Seventy‐one Japanese patients undergoing dialysis with chronic kidney disease and xerosis were randomly assigned to receive a heparinoid‐containing product for 2 weeks (group A [n = 36]) or 8 weeks (group B [n = 35]). Patients were instructed to apply the study product based on the fingertip unit method. The efficacy endpoints were the water content of the stratum corneum (WCSC), skin dryness score, pruritus visual analog scale score, and Dermatology Life Quality Index. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. The mean WCSC (arbitrary units) was 26.0 ± 9.6 in group A and 25.2 ± 10.0 in group B at the start of treatment (week 0), significantly increased to 39.0±12.5 in group A and 38.5 ± 11.0 in group B (P < 0.0001 for both vs week 0) by week 2, and then decreased only in group A. Thus, the WCSC at week 4 (the primary endpoint) remained significantly higher in group B (36.4 ± 12.2 vs 28.8 ± 10.4; P = 0.0068). Other endpoints improved during treatment with the study product. One patient developed a rash and erythema as treatment‐related adverse events. In conclusion, 8 weeks’ application of a heparinoid‐containing product was effective for xerosis in patients undergoing dialysis.

Recommended core outcome instruments for health-related quality of life, long-term control and itch intensity in atopic eczema trials: results of the HOME VII consensus meeting

Background

The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has established a core outcome set of domains for atopic eczema (AE) clinical trials. Previous consensus meetings have agreed on preferred instruments for clinician‐reported signs (Eczema Area and Severity Index, EASI) and patient‐reported symptoms (Patient‐Oriented Eczema Measure, POEM). This paper reports consensus decisions from the HOME VII meeting.

Objectives

To complete the core outcome set for AE by agreeing on core outcome instruments for the domains of quality of life (QoL), long‐term control and itch intensity.

Methods

A face‐to‐face consensus meeting was held in Tokyo, Japan (8–10 April 2019) including 75 participants (49 healthcare professionals/methodologists, 14 patients, 12 industry representatives) from 16 countries. Consensus decisions were made by presentations of evidence, followed by whole and small group discussions and anonymous voting using predefined consensus rules.

Results

It was agreed by consensus that QoL should be measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) for adults, the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) for children and the Infant’s Dermatology Quality of Life Index (IDQoL) for infants. For long‐term control, the Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP) instrument or the Atopic Dermatitis Control Test (ADCT) should be used. Consensus was not reached over the frequency of data collection for long‐term control. The peak itch numerical rating scale (NRS)‐11 past 24 h was recommended as an additional instrument for the symptom domain in trials of older children and adults. Agreement was reached that all core outcome instruments should be captured at baseline and at the time of primary outcome assessment as a minimum.

Conclusions

For now, the core outcome set for clinical trials in AE is complete. The specified domains and instruments should be used in all new clinical trials and systematic reviews of eczema treatments.

What is already known about this topic?

Core outcomes sets improve the design and reporting of clinical trials, reduce selective outcome reporting bias and facilitate meta‐analysis of results in systematic reviews.

The HOME core outcome set for eczema recommends the inclusion of four core domains in all atopic eczema trials: clinician‐reported signs, patient‐reported symptoms, health‐related quality of life (HrQoL) and long‐term control.

Clinician‐reported signs should be captured using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and patient‐reported symptoms using the Patient‐Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM).

What does this study add?

The HOME core outcome set is now complete and recommended core outcome instruments have been agreed on for all four domains.

Core outcome instruments for HrQoL: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) for adults, Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) for children and Infant’s Dermatology Quality of Life Index (IDQoL) for infants.

Core outcome instruments for long‐term control: either the Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP) or the Atopic Dermatitis Control Test (ADCT).

In addition, itch intensity should be measured using the peak NRS‐11 past 24 h for trials including older children and adults.

What are the clinical implications of this work?

If all future trials of eczema treatments include the HOME core outcome instruments, then trial results will be more readily incorporated into meta‐analyses in systematic reviews and clinical care will be informed by the best available evidence.

Linked Comment: D.F. Murrell and C.F. Paul. Br J Dermatol 2021; 185:13–14.

A Case of Autoimmune Hepatitis during Brodalumab Treatment for Psoriasis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammation of the liver caused by hepatocyte-specific autoantigens. Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by a skewed interleukin-17 immune response and dysregulated epidermal hyperproliferation and differentiation. Patients with psoriasis have a higher risk of AIH. Some evidence indicates that AIH is triggered by treatment with certain drugs. Brodalumab is a human monoclonal antibody against interleukin-17 receptor A and is used to treat psoriasis. A 70-year-old Japanese man with psoriasis had elevated serum levels of transaminases and bilirubin, positive antinuclear antibodies, and high serum IgG levels after 11 months of brodalumab treatment. Histological analysis of liver tissue revealed interface hepatitis with lymphoplasmacytic infiltration. AIH was diagnosed and treated with prednisolone, which improved his symptoms. This is the first case of AIH during brodalumab treatment for psoriasis. The relationship between brodalumab and AIH should be further examined, and the risk of AIH in psoriatic patients treated with brodalumab should be carefully considered.

Utility of the Dermatology Life Quality Index at initiation or switching of biologics in real-life Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis: Results from the ProLOGUE study

BACKGROUND

Plaque psoriasis significantly affects patients' health-related quality of life. To aid treatment decisions, not only objective assessment by physicians but also subjective assessment by patients is important.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the significance of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) evaluation at the time of biologics introduction in clinical practice in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

This was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter study. At baseline, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and DLQI scores were measured and stratified based on DLQI scores ≥6/≤5 and PASI scores ≤10/>10. Other patient-reported outcomes assessed included EQ-5D-5L, itch numerical rating scale (NRS), skin pain NRS, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), Sleep Problem Index-II (SPI-II), and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9).

RESULTS

Of the 73 enrolled patients, 23 had PASI scores ≤10. Those with PASI/DLQI scores >10/≥6 had a significantly higher median PASI score than those with PASI/DLQI scores >10/≤5 (p = 0.0125). Regardless of PASI scores (>10/≤10), median itch NRS and GAD-7 scores were significantly higher in patients with DLQI scores ≥6 than in those with DLQI scores ≤5 (itch NRS, p = 0.0361 and p = 0.0086, respectively; GAD-7, p = 0.0167 and p = 0.0273, respectively). Patients with PASI/DLQI scores ≤10/≥6 had significantly higher skin pain NRS (p = 0.0292) and PHQ-8 (p = 0.0255) scores and significantly lower median SPI-II scores (p = 0.0137) and TSQM-9 Effectiveness domain scores (p = 0.0178) than those with PASI/DLQI scores ≤10/≤5.

CONCLUSION

DLQI may be useful for assessing patients' concerns that cannot be identified by PASI alone while initiating biologics or switching from other biologics in clinical practice.

Tralokinumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from two 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase III trials (ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2)

Background

Tralokinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, specifically neutralizes interleukin‐13, a key cytokine driving peripheral inflammation in atopic dermatitis (AD). In phase II studies, tralokinumab combined with topical corticosteroids provided early and sustained improvements in AD signs and symptoms.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab monotherapy in adults with moderate‐to‐severe AD who had an inadequate response to topical treatments.

Methods

In two 52‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase III trials, ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2, adults with moderate‐to‐severe AD were randomized (3 : 1) to subcutaneous tralokinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or placebo. Primary endpoints were Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 at week 16 and ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at week 16. Patients achieving an IGA score of 0 or 1 and/or EASI 75 with tralokinumab at week 16 were rerandomized to tralokinumab Q2W or every 4 weeks or placebo, for 36 weeks. The trials were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03131648 and NCT03160885.

Results

At week 16, more patients who received tralokinumab vs. placebo achieved an IGA score of 0 or 1: 15·8% vs. 7·1% in ECZTRA 1 [difference 8·6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4·1–13·1; P = 0·002] and 22·2% vs. 10·9% in ECZTRA 2 (11·1%, 95% CI 5·8–16·4; P < 0·001) and EASI 75: 25·0% vs. 12·7% (12·1%, 95% CI 6·5–17·7; P < 0·001) and 33·2% vs. 11·4% (21·6%, 95% CI 15·8–27·3; P < 0·001). Early improvements in pruritus, sleep interference, Dermatology Life Quality Index, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis and Patient‐Oriented Eczema Measure were observed from the first postbaseline measurements. The majority of week 16 tralokinumab responders maintained response at week 52 with continued tralokinumab treatment without any rescue medication (including topical corticosteroids). Adverse events were reported in 76·4% and 61·5% of patients receiving tralokinumab in ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2, respectively, and in 77·0% and 66·0% of patients receiving placebo in ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2, respectively, in the 16‐week initial period.

Conclusions

Tralokinumab monotherapy was superior to placebo at 16 weeks of treatment and was well tolerated up to 52 weeks of treatment.

What is already known about this topic?

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic interleukin (IL)‐13‐mediated disease.

There is a need for safe and effective long‐term treatment options for AD.

Tralokinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to IL‐13 with high affinity, thereby preventing receptor interaction and subsequent downstream signalling.

Tralokinumab combined with topical corticosteroids showed early and sustained efficacy and safety in a 12‐week, phase IIb trial in moderate‐to‐severe AD.

What does this study add?

These are the first pivotal phase III trials demonstrating that by specifically targeting IL‐13 alone, patients can achieve significant improvements in AD signs and symptoms and quality of life, and maintain these improvements over time without the requirement for topical corticosteroids.

These trials provide evidence that tralokinumab offers a long‐term, well‐tolerated treatment option for patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD.

Linked Comment: Morra and Drucker. Br J Dermatol 2021; 184:386–387.

Plain language summary available online

Recommended core outcome instruments for health-related quality of life, long-term control and itch intensity in atopic eczema trials: results of the HOME VII consensus meeting

BACKGROUND

The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has established a core outcome set of domains for atopic eczema clinical trials. Previous consensus meetings have agreed upon preferred instruments for clinician-reported signs (Eczema Area and Severity Index - EASI) and patient-reported symptoms (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure - POEM). This paper reports consensus decisions from the HOME VII meeting.

OBJECTIVE

To complete the core outcome set for atopic eczema by agreeing upon core outcome instruments for the domains of quality of life, long-term control and itch intensity.

METHODS

Face-to-face consensus meeting held in Tokyo, Japan (8th to 10th April, 2019) including 74 participants (47 healthcare professionals/methodologists, 14 patients, 13 industry representatives), from 16 countries. Consensus decisions were made by presentations of evidence, followed by whole and small group discussions and anonymous voting using pre-defined consensus rules.

RESULTS

It was agreed by consensus that quality of life should be measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) for adults, the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) for children, and the Infant's Dermatology Quality of Life Index (IDQoL) for infants. For long-term control, the Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP) instrument or the Atopic Dermatitis Control Test (ADCT) should be used. Consensus was not reached over the frequency of data collection for long-term control. The peak itch numerical rating scale(NRS)-11 past 24 hours was recommended as an additional instrument for the symptom domain in trials of older children and adults. Agreement was reached that all core outcome instruments should be captured at baseline and at the time of primary outcome assessment as a minimum.

CONCLUSIONS

For now, the core outcome set for clinical trials in atopic eczema is complete. The specified domains and instruments should be used in all new clinical trials and systematic reviews of eczema treatments.