Long-term safety and effectiveness of etanercept in JIA: an 18-year experience from the BiKeR registry

Background

At present, etanercept represents the most commonly prescribed biologic agent for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treatment. Children and adolescents with JIA are often treated with etanercept over long periods, sometimes even into adulthood. The objectives of this analysis were to determine the long-term safety of etanercept compared to a biologic-naïve cohort and to assess the long-term treatment response upon continuous etanercept exposure using data from the German biologics registry (BiKeR).

Methods

JIA patients newly exposed to etanercept were documented in the BiKeR registry from January 2001 to March 2019, and baseline characteristics, effectiveness, and safety parameters were analysed. Response to treatment was assessed according to 10-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS10), JADAS-defined minimal disease activity and remission, JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) improvement criteria, and ACR-inactive disease definition. Safety assessments were based on adverse event (AE) reports.

Results

A total of 2725 new etanercept users with a diagnosis of JIA were registered. Of these, etanercept was received as a first-line biologic by 95.8% and as monotherapy without concomitant methotrexate by 31.5%. After nine years on continuous treatment, 68.1% of patients presented minimal disease activity, 43.1% JADAS-defined remission on drug, and 36.6% ACR-inactive disease. JIA-ACR30/50/70/90 response rates were still 82/79/71/54% after nine years of treatment. Overall, 2053 AEs (34.3/100PY), including 226 serious AEs (SAE, 3.8/100PY), were observed upon etanercept, compared to 1345 AEs [35.6/100PY; p = 0.3] and 52 SAEs (1.4/100PY; p = 0.0001) in the biologic-naïve cohort. Respective exposure-adjusted rates for etanercept and biologic-naïve patients were 0.9/100PY and 0.2/100PY (p = 0.0001) for serious infections, 0.4/100PY and 0.1/100PY (p = 0.01) for zoster reactivation, 0.3/100PY and 0.03/100PY (p = 0.015) for inflammatory bowel disease, and 1.9/100PY and 1.4/100PY (p = 0.09) for uveitis. Three and two malignancies were documented in the etanercept and biologic-naïve groups, as well as three and one deaths, respectively.

Conclusions

No new safety signal was observed, especially no increased risk for malignancies or autoimmune disorders other than inflammatory bowel disease. However, SAEs and serious infections, though infrequent, were more often reported on etanercept than in biologic-naïve patients. In addition, etanercept demonstrated a long-term maintenance of clinical benefits up to nine years of continuous treatment.

Temporomandibular joint involvement in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a retrospective chart review

OBJECTIVE

To study the proportion of patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), as well as associated clinical characteristics and signs/symptoms.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective chart review on consecutive patients followed in the Hamburg Centre for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology Eilbek between January 2010 and July 2012. TMJ involvement was diagnosed based on clinical examination; a subgroup of patients was also assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

The study included 2413 patients with JIA (52.1% girls, mean age at JIA onset 9.5 years). The most frequent JIA category was oligoarthritis (46.6%), followed by enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA; 38.1%). TMJ involvement was diagnosed in 843/2413 patients (34.9%) (677 MRI-confirmed, four not MRI-confirmed, no MRI examination in 162). Female gender (p = 0.017), higher number of additional joints with active arthritis (p < 0.001), anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) positivity (p = 0.005), higher age (p = 0.020), and oligoarthritis (persistent and extended; p = 0.043) were significantly associated with TMJ involvement. Human leucocyte antigen-B27-positive patients were less likely to have TMJ involvement (p = 0.023). Pain on palpation and pain while chewing were statistically significantly associated with TMJ involvement (p = 0.008 and p = 0.020, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings, to identify TMJ involvement special attention should be paid to JIA patients with female gender, ANA positivity, and oligoarthritis, as well as those with a higher number of additional joints with active arthritis; and regular examinations of the TMJ should be performed.

Long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab in patients with colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever: results from the randomised phase III CLUSTER trial

Objectives

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab to treat patients with colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever (crFMF) during Epoch 4 (weeks 41 to 113) of the CLUSTER study.

Methods

Patients received open-label canakinumab 150 or 300 mg, every 4 or 8 weeks during a 72-week period. We evaluated disease activity every 8 weeks using the physician global assessment (PGA) of disease activity, counting the number of flares, and measuring concentrations of C reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA). Safety was studied by determination and classification of observed adverse events (AEs). We analysed safety and efficacy separately in two subgroups of patients receiving a cumulative dose of less than 2700 mg, or equal or more than 2700 mg.

Results

Of the 61 patients that started the CLUSTER study, 60 entered Epoch 4 and 57 completed it. During the 72-week period, 35/60 (58.3%) patients experienced no flares, and 23/60 (38.3%) had one flare, as compared with a median of 17.5 flares per year reported at baseline. PGA scores indicated no disease activity for the majority of patients throughout the study. Median CRP concentrations were always lower than 10 mg/L, while median SAA concentrations remained over the limit of normal (10 mg/L) but under the 30 mg/L threshold. No new or unexpected AEs were reported.

Conclusion

crFMF patients treated with canakinumab during 72 weeks experienced a minimal incidence of flares and good control of clinical disease activity, with no new safety concerns reported.

THU0512 HEALTH RISK BEHAVIORS IN ADOLESCENTS WITH JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS (JIA) IN THE COURSE OF DISEASE: RESULTS OF THE GERMAN MULTICENTER INCEPTION COHORT (ICON)

Background:

Health risk behaviors (HRB) are defined as specific forms of behavior associated with increased susceptibility to a specific disease or ill health on the basis of epidemiological or social data. The social implications of HRB include being able to use them as a way to gain respect and acceptance from peers, establishing independence from parents, or providing a subjective feeling of maturity and adequate stress management [1].

Objectives:

Since chronically ill adolescents such as those suffering from JIA can develop a HRB that is challenging for optimal care the aim of this study was to compare the frequency of HRB in adolescents with JIA and their peers, and to determine whether they change during the course of disease.

Methods:

Patients ≤ 16 years of age with recently diagnosed JIA (< 12 months) were enrolled in the inception cohort of patients with newly diagnosed JIA (ICON), an ongoing prospective observational, controlled multicenter study started in 2010. Patients from the age of 13 who were questioned about their health behavior and followed up for at least 2 years were selected. HRB were quantified and compared with those of subjects from the general population after matching for age and sex. Data from 2-year follow-up (FU) were used to analyze correlates of multiple risk behavior defined as involvement in two or more risky behaviors.

Results:

A total of 209 adolescents with JIA (63% female, mean age at baseline 14.4±0.9, mean disease duration 2.6±2.0) and 138 healthy peers (55% female, mean age 14.5±1.0) were included. At baseline, 51% of patients were treated with a DMARD, 21% with a biologic (FU: 59% and 38%). The most common JIA category was rheumatoid factor negative polyarthritis (28%). While at baseline 20% of patients and 4% of controls did not engage in regular physical activity, the proportion at follow-up amounted to 16% and 10%, respectively (OR 3.69; 95%CI: 1.01-13.50). In both groups the proportion of regular smokers, alcohol consumers and drug users increased during the observation period. Significant group differences were found in terms of alcohol consumption and smoking habits, but not in relation to illicit and legal drugs (see table). Patients stated significantly more often that they had not used a condom during their last sexual intercourse (28% vs. 19% controls, p<0.05). Multiple risk behavior was associated with PedsQL™ total score (OR 0.96; 95%CI: 0.92-0.99) and disease duration (OR 0.75; 95%CI: 0.57-0.98).

Forms of HRBBaseline2-year follow-upJIAN=209 (%)CGN=138 (%)JIAN=209 (%)CGN=138 (%)Inactivity/smoking/alcohol consumption Physical activity <1/week20.33.716.29.5 Active ≤2/week58.943.454.442.3 Regular smokers2.40.77.82.2 Regular alcohol consumers3.83.615.823.2Drug use 12-month prevalence1.91.48.18.0 Multiple consumers0.50.04.83.6Sexual intercourse Lifetime prevalence3.31.425.223.2 No condom use during last sexual intercourse28.650.028.019.4

Conclusion:

Although adolescents with JIA became more physically active during the course of the disease, they are as likely, or more likely, to take risky behaviors than their healthy peers, except for alcohol consumption. In order to achieve optimal outcomes, addressing emotional wellbeing and providing mandatory anticipatory guidance appears to be warranted in this population.

References:

[1]Villarreal-Rodriguez D et al. Adolescents with chronic disease and participation in risky behaviors. Medicina Universitaria 2013;15(58):21–25.

Acknowledgments:

ICON is supported by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FKZ 01 ER 1504A)

Disclosure of Interests:

Florian Milatz: None declared, Ina Liedmann: None declared, Martina Niewerth: None declared, Jens Klotsche: None declared, Gerd Horneff Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bayer, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Frank Weller-Heinemann: None declared, Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Daniel Windschall: None declared, Kirsten Minden Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Roche

FRI0466 NO DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER 36 MONTHS FOLLOW UP IN THE JUVENILE SYSTEMIC SCLERODERMA INCEPTION COHORT

Background:

Juvenile systemic scleroderma (jSSc) is an orphan disease with a prevalence of 3 in 1 000 000 children. There is rare longitudinal prospective follow up data of patients with jSSc. In the international juvenile systemic scleroderma cohort (JSScC) patients are followed with a standardized assessment prospectively.

Objectives:

To assess the changes regarding organ involvement pattern and patients related outcomes after 36 months follow up in the JSScC.

Methods:

Patients diagnosed according the ACR 2013 criteria for systemic sclerosis were included, if they developed the first non-Raynaud symptom before the age of 16 and were under the age of 18 at the time of inclusion. Patients were followed prospectively every 6 months with a standardized assessment.

Results:

39 patients in the JSScC had 36 months follow up. 80% had a diffuse subtype. 95% of the patients were Caucasian origin. 31 of the patients were female (80%). Mean disease duration at time of inclusion was 3.5 years. Mean age onset of Raynaud’s was 8.8 years and mean age of onset at the first non-Raynaud´s was 9.5 years. Around 30% of the patients were anti-Scl70 positive and none of them anti-centromere positive. The MRSS dropped from the time point of the inclusion into the cohort from 13.9 to 11.8 after 36 months. Pattern of organ involvement did not show any significant change, beside the increase of the nailfold capillary changes from 49% to 73% (p=0.037). No renal crisis occurred. No mortality was observed.

They were positive significant changes in the patient related outcomes. The physician global disease activity decreased from 40.0 to 22.1 assessed on a VAS scale of 0 to 100 (p <0.001).

Patients global disease activity decreased from 43.3 to 20.4 and patients global disease damage from 45.0 to 21.7 both assessed on a VAS scale of 0 to 100 (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

After 36 months follow up, we could observe a significant improvement of patient related outcomes and only one significant change in organ pattern involvement. In a mostly diffuse subset patient population this is a very promising result regarding outcome.

Supported by the “Joachim Herz Stiftung”

Disclosure of Interests:

Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Jens Klotsche: None declared, Ozgur Kasapcopur: None declared, Amra Adrovic: None declared, Maria T. Terreri: None declared, Rolando Cimaz: None declared, Maria Katsikas: None declared, Dana Nemcova: None declared, Maria Jose Santos Speakers bureau: Novartis and Pfizer, Juergen Brunner Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Novartis, Consultant of: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, Mikhail Kostik: None declared, Kirsten Minden Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Roche, Anjali Patwardhan: None declared, Kathryn Torok: None declared, Nicola Helmus: None declared

SAT0500 HOW THE ADULT CRISS WORKS IN PEDIATRIC jSSc PATIENTS - RESULTS FROM THE JUVENILE SCLERODERMA INCEPTION COHORT

Background:

The Composite Response Index in Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) was developed by Dinesh Khanna as a response measure in patients with adult systemic sclerosis. CRISS aims to capture the complexity of systemic sclerosis and to provide a sensitive measure for change in disease activity. The CRISS score is based on a two-step approach. First, significant disease worsening or new-onset organ damage is defined as non-responsiveness. In patients who did not fulfill the criteria of part one, a probability of improvement is calculated for each patient based the Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS), percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), patient and physician global assessments (PGA), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). A probability of 0.6 or higher indicates improvement.

Objectives:

The objective of this study was to validate the CRISS in a prospectively followed cohort of patients with juvenile systemic sclerosis (jSSc).

Methods:

Data from the prospective international inception cohort for jSSc was used to validate the CRISS. Patients with an available 12-months follow-up were included in the analyses. Clinically improvement was defined by the anchor question about improvement (much better or little better versus almost the same, little worse or much worse) in patients overall health due to scleroderma since the last visit provided by the treating physician.

Results:

Forty seven jSSc patients were included in the analysis. 74.2% had diffuse subtype. The physician rated the disease as improved in 34 patients (72.3%) since the last visit. No patient had a renal crisis or new onset of left ventricular failure during the 12-months follow-up. Three patients (3.4%) each had a new onset or worsening of lung fibrosis and new onset of pulmonary arterial hypertension. In total, 6 patients resulted in a rating of not improved based on the CRISS in part I. The mRSSS, FVC%, CHAQ and PGA significantly improved during the 12-months follow-up in patients who were rated as improved. The predicted probability based on the CRISS algorithm resulted in an area under curve of 0.77 predicting the anchor question of improvement. In summary, 33 (70.0%) patients were correctly classified by the adult CRISS score resulting in an overall area under curve of 0.7.

Conclusion:

The CRISS score was evaluated in a pediatric jSSc cohort for the first time. It showed a good performance. However, it seems that the formula of part II of the CRISS score needs a calibration to pediatric jSSc patients.

Disclosure of Interests:

Jens Klotsche: None declared, Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Ozgur Kasapcopur: None declared, Amra Adrovic: None declared, Kathryn Torok: None declared, Valda Stanevicha: None declared, Jordi Anton Grant/research support from: grants from Pfizer, abbvie, Novartis, Sobi. Gebro, Roche, Novimmune, Sanofi, Lilly, Amgen, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, abbvie, Novartis, Sobi. Gebro, Roche, Novimmune, Sanofi, Lilly, Amgen, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Pfizer, abbvie, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Pfizer, abbvie, Speakers bureau: abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Sobi, Gebro, Speakers bureau: abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Sobi, Gebro, edoardo marrani: None declared, Maria T. Terreri: None declared, Flávio R. Sztajnbok: None declared, Cristina Battagliotti: None declared, Lillemor Berntson Consultant of: paid by Abbvie as a consultant, Speakers bureau: paid by Abbvie for giving speaches about JIA, Despina Eleftheriou: None declared, Gerd Horneff Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bayer, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Farzana Nuruzzaman: None declared, Nicola Helmus: None declared

FRI0456 EARLY IMPLEMENTATION OF TREATMENT WITH ETANERCEPT INCREASES THE LIKELIHOOD TO ACHIEVE REMISSION

Background:

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease in children and adolescents. A consistent therapy is required to avoid consequential damage and permanent loss of function. Biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) provide a well-accepted option for treatment of patients with a severe course of JIA. Etanercept (ETA) is still the most commonly prescribed bDMARD for JIA in Germany.

Objectives:

To analyze adherence to treatment with ETA with special attention on discontinuation after achieving an inactive disease and recurrence of active disease after ETA withdrawal.

Methods:

Data from two ongoing prospective, multicenter, non-interventional registries BiKeR and JuMBO were used for the analysis. JuMBO is the follow-up study to BiKeR and follows patients who have reached the age of 18. Both registers provide treatment data, individual trajectories of clinical data and outcomes from childhood into adulthood in JIA patients treated with bDMARDs and csDMARDs. Clinical disease characteristics, such as disease activity, were reported by the rheumatologists in addition to patient-reported outcomes at each six-months follow-up. Remission was defined as inactive disease defined by the Wallace Criteria (1).

Results:

Data from 2,500 patients who were included in BiKeR and had an age ≥18 at the time of analysis were considered. A subset of 1,535 were enrolled in JuMBO. The mean follow-up was 8.6 (SD 4.2) years for the JuMBO patients. The majority of them had polyarthritis (35%), followed by enthesitis-related arthritis (20%). A total of 1,779 (68.8% of 2,584) patients were ever treated with ETA, providing 2,178 ETA treatment courses. There were 1,724 (67%) patients with first, 338 patients with a second and 54 with a third course of ETA treatment course. 710 (41.2%) discontinued ETA by ineffectiveness in the first course with similar rates of discontinuation due to ineffectiveness in the first and second course. A total of 332 (+/-MTX, 19.3%) discontinued ETA after achieving remission in the first ETA course. Among those, 129 (38.9%) patients did not require treatment with any other bDMARD subsequently until last follow-up (3.9 years, SD 3.5), while 169 (50.9%) re-started treatment with ETA, 14 (4.2%) with adalimumab and 4 with other bDMARDs. The likelihood of discontinuing ETA due to an inactive disease was positively associated with a younger age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.08, p<0.001), persistent oligoarthritis (HR 1.89, p=0.004), a shorter duration between JIA onset and ETA start (HR 1.10, p<0.001) as well as a good response to therapy within the first six months of treatment (HR 1.11, p<0.001). 209 (of 332) had ETA monotherapy at withdrawal. Of those, 77% (n=161) experienced recurrence of disease with a mean time to flare of 12.1 (SD 13.7) months. 129 patients restarted bDMARD therapy (n=117 ETA). We could not identify any correlates for the risk of flare. 70% re-achieved remission and 20% again discontinued therapy thereafter.

Conclusion:

The study confirms the good effectiveness of ETA, even in the re-treatment of patients with JIA. Our data highlight the association of an early bDMARD treatment with a higher likelihood to achieve an inactive disease indicating a window of opportunity.

References:

[1]Wallace CA, Giannini EH, Huang B et al. American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria for defining clinical inactive disease in select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 2011;63:929–36

Disclosure of Interests:

Jens Klotsche: None declared, Gerd Horneff Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bayer, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Peter Haas: None declared, Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Martina Niewerth: None declared, Kirsten Minden Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Roche

FRI0486 LONG-TERM EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CANAKINUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOINFLAMMATORY PERIODIC FEVER SYNDROMES – FIRST INTERIM ANALYSIS OF THE FMF/TRAPS/HIDS SUBGROUPS FROM THE RELIANCE REGISTRY

Background:

Autoinflammatory periodic fever syndromes characterized by excessive interleukin(IL)-1b release and severe systemic and organ inflammation have been successfully treated with the anti-IL-1 inhibitor canakinumab (CAN). In clinical trial situations and real life, rapid remission of symptoms and normalization of laboratory parameters were observed in most patients.1-3

Objectives:

The present study explores long-term effectiveness and safety of CAN under routine clinical practice conditions in pediatric and adult patients with CAPS (cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes), FMF (familial Mediterranean fever), TRAPS (tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome) and HIDS/MKD (hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome/mevalonate kinase deficiency).

Methods:

RELIANCE is a prospective, non-interventional, multi-center, observational study based in Germany with a 3-year follow-up period. Pediatric (age ≥2 years) and adult patients with clinically confirmed diagnoses of CAPS, FMF, TRAPS and HIDS/MKD that routinely receive CAN are enrolled in order to evaluate effectiveness and safety of CAN in clinical routine.

Results:

This first interim analysis of patient subgroups diagnosed with FMF, HIDS and TRAPS includes baseline data of 41 patients (10 TRAPS, 2 HIDS, 29 FMF), including preliminary 6-month data of a FMF-subset (N=16).

Evaluation of disease activity and fatigue by patients’ assessment, days absent from school/work, inflammatory markers and physician global assessment (PGA) was performed at baseline and will be further assessed at 6-monthly intervals within the 3-year observation period. Preliminary results of a first subset of 16 patients diagnosed with FMF are available and indicate stable remission and disease control upon long-term CAN treatment: within the first study interval, no major changes were observed regarding the analyzed parameters (table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the TRAPS/HIDS/FMF-subgroups and preliminary 6-month data of FMF subset.

TRAPSHIDSFMFBaselineBaselineBaselineall FMF patientsBaselineFMF subset6 monthsFMF subsetNumber of patients, N102291616Mean age, years (SD)22 (4; 43)11 (5; 18)26 (5; 56)16 (5; 47)16 (5; 47)Female (%), N=9 (1 missing)5 (56)1 (50)15 (52)7 (44)7 (44)Mean duration of prior canakinumab treatment, years (min; max)1 (0; 2)3 (2; 4)n. a.2.2 (0; 6)2.2 (0; 6)Patient’s assessment of disease activity 0-10, mean (min; max)2.1 (0; 5)0 (0; 0)3 (0; 10)2.8 (0; 8)2.2 (0; 7)Patient’s assessment of fatigue 0-103.4 (0; 8)0 (0; 0)4.4 (0; 9)4.6 (0; 9)3.9 (0; 8)Number (%) of patients with days absent from school/work due to study indication during last 6 months4 (44)2 (100)5 (17)2 (13)5 (31)Inflammatory markers, CRP/SAA, mean (mg/dL)2.07.90.10.60.95.30.52.40.62.4PGA of disease activity: no/mild to moderate/severe; N (%)*1 (11)6 (67)0 (0)2 (100)0 (0)0 (0)10 (35)8 (28)2 (7)5 (31)7 (44)1 (6)6 (38)7 (44)0 (0)SAE, N (%)0 (0)0 (0)2 (6.9)n. a.2 (12.5)

Conclusion:

Baseline characteristics of all subgroups and first interim data of FMF patients are available from the RELIANCE study, the longest running real-life CAN registry. Further interval data will be analyzed to assess efficacy and safety of long-term CAN-treatment in patients with autoinflammatory periodic fever syndromes.

References:

[1]Lachmann et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(23):2416-25

[2]Kuemmerle-Deschner et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016;55(4):689-96

[3]De Benedetti et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(20):1908-1919

Disclosure of Interests:

Jörg Henes Grant/research support from: Novartis, Roche-Chugai, Consultant of: Novartis, Roche, Celgene, Pfizer, Abbvie, Sanofi, Boehringer-Ingelheim,, J. B. Kuemmerle-Deschner Grant/research support from: Novartis, AbbVie, Sobi, Consultant of: Novartis, AbbVie, Sobi, Michael Borte Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Shire, Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Gerd Horneff Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bayer, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Tilmann Kallinich Grant/research support from: Novartis, Consultant of: Sobi, Roche, Novartis, Birgit Kortus-Goetze Consultant of: Novartis, Frank Weller-Heinemann: None declared, Julia Weber-Arden Employee of: I am employed by Novartis, Norbert Blank Grant/research support from: Novartis, Sobi, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Lilly, Pfizer, Abbvie, BMS, MSD, Actelion, UCB, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche

SAT0502 LONG-TERM OBSERVATIONAL SAFETY SURVEILLANCE OF GOLIMUMAB TREATMENT FOR POLYARTICULAR JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHIRTIS—AN INTERIM ANALYSIS

Background:

Golimumab (GOL) is approved for treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) in patients 2 years and older. Data on long-term safety in this indication are limited.

Objectives:

Prospective monitoring of long-term safety and effectiveness of GOL in routine care using the German BIKER registry.

Methods:

In this non-interventional study baseline and safety parameters were compared between patients initiating GOL and contemporary matched control cohorts starting either an alternative TNF inhibitor (TNFi) or methotrexate (MTX) without exposure to a biologic. Efficacy outcomes were JADAS10, JIA ACR scores, joint counts and Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire disability-index (CHAQ-DI). Safety assessments were based on adverse event (AE) reports.

Results:

From 2016 to 2019, 55 patients initiating GOL have been recruited and matched to 110 patients starting alternative TNFi and 47 biologic-naïve patients. Patients starting GOL had a longer disease duration (6.8y vs. 4.1 y and 1.0y; p<0.0001) and use of GOL was significantly more often second-line (85% vs 31% and 0%, p<0.0001). Disease activity was lower at baseline compared to MTX patients as indicated by active joint counts, JADAS10 and concomitant steroid use. Otherwise they were comparable with patients treated with other TNFi (Table 1).

Table 1

Comparison of GOL cohort with (1) other TNFi cohort and (2) MTX cohort.

GOLN=55Other TNFiN=110MTXN=47p-value #GOL vs TNFi/MTXGender female, n (%)44 (80)86 (78)34 (72)0.8/0.5Age at baseline, mean (SD), years13.6 (2.8)13.6 (3.0)13.1 (3.4)1.0/0.4Disease duration, mean (SD), years6.8 (4.5)4.1 (3.8)1.0 (1.6)<0.0001RF neg. polyarthritis, n (%)28 (51)53 (48)29 (62)0.7/0.3RF pos. polyarthritis, n (%)6 (11)18 (16.4)11 (23.4)0.5/0.1Extended oligoarthritis, n (%)20 (36.4)37 (33.6)6 (12.8)0.7/0.007Psoriatic arthritis1 (1.8)2 (1.8)1 (2.1)1.0/1.0Pretreatment bDMARD n(%)47 (85.5)34 (30.9)0<0.0001Concomitant steroids, n (%)9 (16.4)26 (23.6)25 (53.2)0.3/0.0001Active joint count, mean (SD)4.6 (4.0)5.4 (6.1)9.7 (6.5)0.4/<0.0001CHAQ DI, mean (SD)0.4 (0.4)0.5 (0.6)0.6 (0.7)0.3/0.07ESR, mm/h, mean (SD)20.4 (27.6)15.4 (18.6)21.4 (18.6)0.2/0.8JADAS10, mean (SD)11.3 (6.0)12.4 (5.8)16.9 (5.4)0.3/<0.0001AE, n (rate/100PY; 95%CI)45 (96; 72-128)106 (114; 94-138)39 (107; 78-146)0.3/0.6SAE, n (rate/100PY; 95%CI)2 (4.2; 1.1-17)5 (5.4; 2-13)1 (2.7; 0.4-19)0.8/0.7Infectious AE, n (rate/100PY; 95%CI)6 (12.8; 5.7-28)11 (11.8; 6.5-21)9 (24.5; 13-47)0.9/0.2Serious infections, n (rate/100PY; 95%CI)02 (2.2; 0.5-8.6)0n.a.Uveitis new manifestation1 (2.1; 0.3-15)2 (2.2; 0.5-8.6)01.0/n.a.

In GOL treated patients a marked clinical response was noted at 6 months and beyond demonstrated by a significant decrease of the mean JADAS 10 from 11.3 to 6.4 (p=0.0008), as well as JIA ACR 30/50/70/90 response rates of 56/56/35/21%. JADAS remission and minimal disease activity was observed in 18% and 47% after 6 months and in 29% and 43% of patients after 12 months.

Rates of AE, SAE and infectious AE were comparable between the GOL cohort (96, 4.2 and 12.8/100PY), the alternative TNFi cohort (114, 5.4 and 11.8/100PY) and the MTX cohort (107, 2.7 and 24.5/100PY). SAE reported in the GOL cohort were uveitis and JIA flare (each 1). Two serious infections, both influenza, were reported in the alternative TNFi cohort, none in the GOL cohort. No case of pregnancy, malignancy or death was reported.

Conclusion:

Interim results from this ongoing safety surveillance study indicate acceptable safety and tolerability of GOL in pJIA that is comparable to treatment with alternative TNFi or MTX. The long-term effectiveness data reinforce the established efficacy of GOL in pJIA treatment.

Disclosure of Interests:

Gerd Horneff Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bayer, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Angela Zimmer: None declared, Kirsten Minden Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Roche, Toni Hospach: None declared, Frank Weller-Heinemann: None declared, Sandra Hansmann Consultant of: Advisory board Novartis Pharma, Jasmin Kuemmerle-Deschner Grant/research support from: Novartis, Sobi, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Speakers bureau: Novartis, Sobi, Maria Fasshauer Consultant of: Shire, CSL Behring, Nadja Hofmann: None declared, Hans Koessel: None declared, Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Sonja Mrusek: None declared, Daniel Windschall Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Nils Onken: None declared, Markus Hufnagel: None declared, Dirk Foell Grant/research support from: Novartis, Sobi, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Novartis, Sobi, Normi Brueck: None declared, Prasad Oommen Consultant of: Novartis, Frank Dressler: None declared, Astrid Helling-Bakki: None declared, Ariane Klein Consultant of: Celgene

SAT0510 LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS OF CANAKINUMAB IN AID – INTERIM ANALYSIS OF THE CAPS SUBGROUP FROM THE RELIANCE REGISTRY

Background:

In the treatment of monogenic autoinflammatory diseases (AID), a heterogeneous group of diseases with excessive interleukin (IL)-1β release and severe systemic and organ inflammation, the anti-IL-1 inhibitor canakinumab (CAN) has been associated with rapid remission of symptoms in clinical trials as well as in real-life.1-3

Objectives:

The aim of the RELIANCE registry is to explore long-term effectiveness and safety of CAN under routine clinical practice conditions in pediatric and adult patients with CAPS (cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes, including Muckle-Wells syndrome [MWS], familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome [FCAS], neonatal onset multisystem inflammatory disease [NOMID]/chronic infantile neurological cutaneous and articular syndrome [CINCA]), FMF (familial Mediterranean fever), TRAPS (tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome) and HIDS/MKD (hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome/mevalonate kinase deficiency).

Methods:

This prospective, non-interventional, observational study is based in Germany with a 3-year follow-up and enrolls pediatric ≥2 years and adult patients with clinically confirmed diagnoses of CAPS, FMF, TRAPS and HIDS/MKD routinely receiving CAN. In 6-monthly visits, clinical data and patient-reported outcomes are assessed. Study endpoints are long-term effectiveness and safety of CAN. Here, the CAPS cohort was analyzed.

Results:

This 18-month interim-analysis includes 78 CAPS patients (49% females) enrolled by September 2019. Mean age at baseline was 25 years and mean duration of prior CAN treatment was 5.7 years. 64 patients (82%) had MWS, 2 FCAS, 7 NOMID/CINCA, 3 atypical CAPS and 2 lacked subtype diagnosis. Disease activity, fatigue and social impairment by patients’ assessment, days absent from school/work, inflammatory markers, and remission by physician assessment were evaluated at 6-monthly intervals starting at baseline with last update at 18 months of follow-up (table 1). The results demonstrate sustained remission and disease control as evaluated parameters remained stable over time. Serious adverse events were reported for 9 patients including papillitis, pyrexia, tonsillitis (n=2), appendicitis, chest pain, circulatory collapse, skin disorders, and preterm delivery.

Table 1.

Patient and physician assessment of clinical CAPS disease activity and laboratory markers over time

Baseline6 months12 months18 monthsNumber of patients, N78514229Mean age, years (SD)25 (4; 79)22 (4; 79)20 (4; 58)22 (4; 54)Patient’s assessment of disease activity 0-10, mean (min; max)2.2 (0; 7)1.8 (0; 7)2.4 (0; 7)2.8 (0; 8)Patient’s assessment of fatigue 0-102.9 (0; 9)2.4 (0; 8)2.8 (0; 8)1.7 (0; 7)Number (%) of patients without impairment of social life by disease16 (49)29 (76)20 (61)14 (67)Number (%) of patients with days absent from school/work25 (32.5)11 (22)14 (34)15 (52)Inflammatory markers, CRP/SAA, mean (mg/dL)0.43.20.42.10.30.80.20.5Number (%) of patients in disease remission (physician assessment)55 (72)38 (76)29 (71)22 (76)

Conclusion:

The 18-month interim analysis of the RELIANCE study, the longest running real-life CAN registry, demonstrates that long-term CAN treatment is safe and effective in CAPS patients.

References:

[1]Lachmann et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(23):2416-25

[2]Kuemmerle-Deschner et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016;55(4):689-96

[3]De Benedetti et al. N Engl. J Med. 2018;378(20):1908-1919

Disclosure of Interests:

Norbert Blank Grant/research support from: Novartis, Sobi, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Lilly, Pfizer, Abbvie, BMS, MSD, Actelion, UCB, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, Michael Borte Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Shire, Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Gerd Horneff Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bayer, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Tilmann Kallinich Grant/research support from: Novartis, Consultant of: Sobi, Roche, Novartis, Birgit Kortus-Goetze Consultant of: Novartis, Prasad Oommen Consultant of: Novartis, Catharina Schuetz: None declared, Frank Weller-Heinemann: None declared, Julia Weber-Arden Employee of: I am employed by Novartis, J. B. Kuemmerle-Deschner Grant/research support from: Novartis, AbbVie, Sobi, Consultant of: Novartis, AbbVie, Sobi

THU0499 IS THERE A DIFFERENT PRESENTATION OF JUVENILE SYSTEMIC DIFFUSE AND LIMITED SUBSET? DATA FROM THE JUVENILE SCLERODERMA INCEPTION COHORT. WWW.JUVENILE-SCLEORDERMA.COM

Background:

Juvenile systemic scleroderma (jSSc) is an orphan disease with a prevalence of 3 per 1 000 000 children. There are limited data regarding the clinical presentation of jSSc. The Juvenile Systemic Scleroderma Inception Cohort (JSSIC) is the largest multinational registry that prospectively collects information about jSSc patients.

Objectives:

Evaluation of the jSSc patients at the time of inclusion in the JSSIC.

Methods:

Patients were included in the JSSIC if they fulfilled the adult ACR/EULAR classification criteria for systemic scleroderma, if they presented the first non-Raynaud symptom before 16 years of age and if they were younger than 18 years of age at time of inclusion. Patients’ characteristics at time of inclusion were evaluated.

Results:

Until 15thof December 2019 hundred fifty patients were included, 83% of them being Caucasian and 80% female. The majority had the diffuse subtype (72%) and 17% of all jSSc had overlap features. The mean age of first presentation of Raynaud´s phenomenon was 9.8 years in the diffuse subtype (djSSc) and 10.7 years in the limited subtype (ljSSc) (p=.197). The mean age at first non-Raynaud’s symptoms was 10.0 years in the djSSc and 11.2 years in the ljSSc (p=0.247). Mean disease duration at time of inclusion was 3.4 years in the djSSc and 2.4 years in the ljSSc group.

Significant differences were found between the groups regarding mean modified Rodnan skin score, 18.2 in the djSSc vs 6.2 in the ljSSc (p=0.02); presence of Gottron´s papulae (djSSc 30% vs ljSSc 13%, p=0.43);presence of teleangiectasia (djSSc 42% vs 18% ljSS, p=0.01); history of ulceration (djSSc 42% vs 18% ljSSc,p=0.008); 6 Minute walk test below the 10thpercentile (djSSc 85% vs ljSSc 54%, p=0.044), total pulmonary involvement (djSSc 49% vs ljSSc 31%, p=0.045), cardiac involvement (ljSSc 17% vs djSSc 3%, p=0.002). djSSc patients had significantly worse scores for Physician Global Assessment of disease activity compared to ljSSc patients (VAS 0-100) (40 vs 15) (p=0.001) and for Physician Global Assessment of disease damage (VAS 0-100) (36 vs 17) (p=0.001).

There were no statistically significant differences in the other presentations. Pulmonary hypertension occurred in approximately 6% in both groups. No systemic hypertension or renal crisis was reported. ANA positivity was 90% in both groups. Anti-Scl70 was positive in 35% in djSSc and 36% in the ljSSc group. Anticentromere positivity occurred in 3% in the djSSc and 7% in the ljSSc group.

Conclusion:

In this unique large cohort of jSSc patients there were significant differences between djSSc and ljSSc patients at time of inclusion into the cohort regarding skin, vascular, pulmonary and cardiac involvement. According to the physician global scores the djSSc patients had a significantly more severe disease. Interestingly the antibody profile was similar in both scleroderma phenotypes.

Supported by the “Joachim Herz Stiftung”

Disclosure of Interests: :

Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Jens Klotsche: None declared, Ozgur Kasapcopur: None declared, Amra Adrovic: None declared, Kathryn Torok: None declared, Maria T. Terreri: None declared, Ana Paula Sakamoto: None declared, Valda Stanevicha: None declared, Flávio R. Sztajnbok: None declared, Jordi Anton Grant/research support from: grants from Pfizer, abbvie, Novartis, Sobi. Gebro, Roche, Novimmune, Sanofi, Lilly, Amgen, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, abbvie, Novartis, Sobi. Gebro, Roche, Novimmune, Sanofi, Lilly, Amgen, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Pfizer, abbvie, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Pfizer, abbvie, Speakers bureau: abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Sobi, Gebro, Speakers bureau: abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Sobi, Gebro, Brian Feldman Consultant of: DSMB for Pfizer, OPTUM and AB2-Bio, Ekaterina Alexeeva Grant/research support from: Roche, Pfizer, Centocor, Novartis, Speakers bureau: Roche, Novartis, Pfizer., Maria Katsikas: None declared, Vanessa Smith Grant/research support from: The affiliated company received grants from Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgian Fund for Scientific Research in Rheumatic diseases (FWRO), Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and Janssen-Cilag NV, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co, Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and UCB Biopharma Sprl, edoardo marrani: None declared, Mikhail Kostik: None declared, Natalia Vasquez-Canizares: None declared, Simone Appenzeller: None declared, Mahesh Janarthanan: None declared, Monika Moll: None declared, Dana Nemcova: None declared, Anjali Patwardhan: None declared, Maria Jose Santos Speakers bureau: Novartis and Pfizer, Sujata Sawhney: None declared, Dieneke Schonenberg: None declared, Cristina Battagliotti: None declared, Lillemor Berntson Consultant of: paid by Abbvie as a consultant, Speakers bureau: paid by Abbvie for giving speaches about JIA, Blanca Bica: None declared, Juergen Brunner Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Novartis, Consultant of: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, Patricia Costa Reis: None declared, Despina Eleftheriou: None declared, Liora Harel: None declared, Gerd Horneff Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bayer, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Daniela Kaiser: None declared, Dragana Lazarevic: None declared, Kirsten Minden Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Roche, Susan Nielsen: None declared, Farzana Nuruzzaman: None declared, Yosef Uziel: None declared, Nicola Helmus: None declared

SAT0490 MATCHED CONTROLLED SURVEILLANCE OF TOCILIZUMAB TREATMENT FOR POLYARTICULAR JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS–AN INTERIM ANALYSIS

Background:

Tocilizumab (TOC) is approved for treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA). Data out of clinical practice are limited.

Objectives:

Long-term surveillance of patients initiating TOC treatment compared to a cohort of patients initiating a comparator biologic using the BIKER-registry.

Methods:

Baseline parameters, efficacy and safety parameters were compared. Efficacy outcomes were JADAS10 and joint counts. Functional status was determined with the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire disability-index (CHAQ-DI). Safety was assessed by adverse events (AE) reports.

Results:

Until January 2020, 152 patients have been recruited to each cohort. Patients starting on TOC were older at treatment start (12.1 vs. 10.1 years (y); p<0.0001) and had a longer disease duration (5.4y vs. 3.0y; p<0.0001). TOC was significantly more often a second-line biologic (84% vs 13%, p< 0.0001). Otherwise patients were comparable (Table 1).

Table 1.

Comparison of TOC patients and matched controls.

TocilizumabN=152Matched controlsN=152pGender female, n (%)128 (84)124 (81)0.65Disease duration, mean (SD), years5.4 (4.1)3.0 (2.9)<0.0001RF neg. polyarthritis, n (%)104 (68.4)92 (60.5)0.19RF pos. polyarthritis, n (%)14 (9.2)19 (12.5)0.46Extended oligoarthritis, n (%)34 (22.4)41 (27)0.42Pretreatment with biologics, n(%)127 (83.5)20 (13.2)<0.0001Active joint count, mean (SD)6.7 (7.1)6.1 (5.1)0.4CHAQ DI, mean (SD)0.63 (0.63)0.65 (0.64)0.8ESR, mm/h, mean (SD)17.5 (14.9)20.9 (20.6)0.1JADAS10, mean (SD)16.8 (9.8)15.1 (5.8)0.067Efficacy Month 12N=87N=105JADAS MDA, n (%)50 (57.5)63 (60.0)0.77JADAS REM, n (%)32 (36.8)39 (37.1)1.0JIA ACR 30/50/70/90, %80/75/61/5386/84/70/560.34/0.15/0.17/0.66Adverse eventsN (rate/100PY; 95%CI)248,65 PY290.4 PYRR (95%CI); pAE145 (58.3; 50-69)157 (54.1; 46-63)1.1 (0.9-1.4); 0.5SAE12 (4.8; 2.7-8.5)4 (1.4; 0.5-3.7)3.5 (1.1-10.9); 0.03Medically important infection2 (0.8; 0.2-3.2)12 (4.1; 2.3-7.3)0.2 (0.04-0.9); 0.03Uveitis event2 (0.8; 0.2-3.2)12 (4.1; 2.3-7.3)0.2 (0.04-0.9); 0.03

Upon TOC a substantial response to treatment with a significant reduction in JADAS 10 from 16.8 to 3.4 (p<0.0001) after 12 months was observed. There were no significant differences between patients from the TOC cohort and their matched controls regarding JIA ACR 30/50/70/90 criteria and active joint counts. JADAS 10, JADAS remission (REM) and minimal disease activity (MDA) was reached by comparable numbers in the TOC (37% and 58%) and the control cohort (37% and 60%).

While the total number of AE was comparable between the TOC cohort (58/100PY) and in the control cohort (54/100PY; RR 1.1; 95%CI 0.9-1.4), more serious AE (SAE) were reported with TOC (4.8/100PY compared to 1.4/100PY; RR 3.5; 95% CI 1-10.9). Medically important infections and uveitis events were documented at significantly lower frequency in the TOC- (0.8/100PY) than in the control cohort (4.1/100PY; RR 0.2; 95% CI 0.04-0.9). SAE with TOC were suicidal intent (n=3), depression (n=2), exacerbation of JIA, abscess, gastrointestinal infection, abdominal pain, colitis, bone surgery and fracture (n=1). SAE in the control cohort were depression, osteomyelitis, gastrointestinal infection and superinfected eczema (n=1). No significant differences regarding cytopenia and elevated transaminases were observed. No gastrointestinal perforation, no vascular event, no malignancy and no death occurred.

Conclusion:

The efficacy of tocilizumab is comparable to that of alternative biologics. Tolerability was acceptable. As Tocilizumab was given as a second-line biologic in the vast majority of patients, comparisons between the cohorts have to be interpreted carefully. Observation in the registry is ongoing.

Disclosure of Interests:

Ariane Klein Consultant of: Celgene, Toni Hospach: None declared, Frank Weller-Heinemann: None declared, Sandra Hansmann Consultant of: Advisory board Novartis Pharma, Jasmin Kuemmerle-Deschner Grant/research support from: Novartis, Sobi, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Speakers bureau: Novartis, Sobi, Maria Fasshauer Consultant of: Shire, CSL Behring, Kirsten Minden Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Roche, Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Christoph Rietschel Consultant of: Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Chugai, and Sobi, Tobias Schwarz: None declared, Ralf Trauzeddel: None declared, Markus Hufnagel: None declared, Dirk Foell Grant/research support from: Novartis, Sobi, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Novartis, Sobi, Rainer Berendes: None declared, Gundula Boeschow: None declared, Prasad Oommen Consultant of: Novartis, Frank Dressler: None declared, Astrid Helling-Bakki: None declared, Gerd Horneff Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bayer, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche

OP0272 LONG-TERM EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CANAKINUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH COLCHICINE-RESISTANT FAMILIAL MEDITERRANEAN FEVER: RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMISED PHASE 3 CLUSTER TRIAL

Background:

Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is a hereditary autoinflammatory disease associated with mutations in theMEFVgene. Colchicine is the cornerstone of current therapy for FMF; however, a subset of patients are resistant or intolerant to it. Previously published results from the CLUSTER trial [NCT02059291] demonstrated that canakinumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-1β monoclonal antibody, was effective in controlling and preventing flares in patients with colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever (crFMF).1

Objectives:

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab to treat patients with crFMF during Epoch 4 of the CLUSTER study.

Methods:

Patients with active crFMF (baseline flare) were enrolled in the CLUSTER study. During Epoch 4 (weeks 40 to 113), patients received open-label canakinumab 150 or 300 mg, every 4 or 8 weeks (q4w or q8w). Patients started Epoch 4 on the same regimen that they were receiving at the end of Epoch 3, and stepwise up-titration of canakinumab was allowed in patients who experienced a flare, to a maximum dose of 300 mg q4w. We evaluated disease activity every 8 weeks using the physician global assessment of disease activity (PGA), counting the number of flares (defined as PGA ≥2 and CRP >30 mg/L), and measuring serum concentrations of C reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA). Safety was assessed by the determination and classification of adverse events (AEs). We analysed safety and efficacy separately in two subgroups of patients receiving a cumulative dose of canakinumab lower than 2700 mg, or equal or higher than 2700 mg.

Results:

Of the 61 patients with active crFMF who started the CLUSTER study, 60 entered Epoch 4 and 57 completed it. During the 72-week period, 35/60 (58.3%) patients experienced no flares, and 23/60 (38.3%) had one single flare, as compared with a median of 17.5 flares per year reported at baseline. The incidence of flares was similar in the two cumulative dose groups. PGA scores indicated no disease activity for the majority of patients throughout the study, in both cumulative dose groups. 23/57 (40%) of patients remained in the lower dosing group (150 mg q8w) until study end, whereas 9/57 (16%) required the highest dose allowed (300 mg q4w). Patients with higher body weight had an increased probability to require up-titration of canakinumab to control disease activity. Median CRP concentrations were lower than 10 mg/L at every time point in both cumulative dose groups, while median SAA concentrations remained in the 16-70 mg/L range, and were higher in the group receiving ≥2700 mg canakinumab (Figure 1). No opportunistic infections, renal disease caused by amyloidosis, new or unexpected AEs were reported.

Figure 1.

SAA and CRP blood levels in Epoch 4 of the CLUSTER study, in two subgroups of patients treated with a cumulative dose of canakinumab <2700 mg or ≥2700 mg

Conclusion:

Patients with crFMF treated with canakinumab during 72 weeks experienced a minimal incidence of flares and good control of clinical disease activity, with no new safety signals reported.

References:

[1]De Benedetti F et al.N Engl J Med2018;378:1908–19.

Disclosure of Interests:

Seza Özen Consultant of: Novartis, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Eldad Ben-Chetrit Speakers bureau: Novartis, Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Gil Amarilyo Grant/research support from: Novartis, Speakers bureau: Novartis, Huri Ozdogan: None declared, Steven Vanderschueren: None declared, Katherine Marzan Grant/research support from: Novartis, J Michelle Kahlenberg Grant/research support from: Celgene, BMS, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingleheim, Elise Dekker Employee of: Novartis, Fabrizio De Benedetti Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, Novimmune, Sobi, Sanofi, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, Roche, Sobi, Isabelle Koné-Paut Consultant of: Novartis, Chugai, Pfizer, LFB, AbbVie, Novimmune, SOBI

THU0497 MAINTENANCE OF MINIMAL DISEASE ACTIVITY OR INACTIVE DISEASE STATUS AND PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN INDIVIDUAL PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS TREATED WITH SUBCUTANEOUS ABATACEPT

Background:

Maintenance of clinical response over time has been shown in individual patients (pts) with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) treated with SC abatacept (ABA).1It is unknown whether each individual pt with sustained efficacy also consistently maintains the previously reported shorter-term benefits on patient-reported outcomes (PROs)2,3over time.

Objectives:

Investigate whether combined efficacy and stringent, optimal PRO responses to ABA treatment are maintained by individual pts with pJIA over time.

Methods:

In this analysis of the intent-to-treat population, pts in two age cohorts (2–5 and 6–17 yrs) who achieved clinical response to weekly SC ABA (10–<25 kg [50 mg], 25–<50 kg [87.5 mg], ≥50 kg [125 mg]) at Mo 4 (time point of primary pharmacokinetic endpoint4) were followed for 2 yrs. Stringent efficacy outcomes (Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 27 [JADAS27] minimal disease activity [MDA; ≤3.8] and inactive disease [ID; ≤1] status) were combined with optimal PRO endpoints (childhood [C]HAQ-DI=0, Parental Global Assessment [PaGA] ≤1 and Pain visual analogue scale [VAS] <35). Combined efficacy and PRO responses were analysed at Mos 4, 13 and 21.

Results:

219 pts entered the study (46 [21.0%] 2–5 yrs; 173 [79.0%] 6–17 yrs); a subgroup of these pts achieved a clinical response at Mo 4 (Table 1). Many pts who achieved JADAS27 MDA or JADAS27 ID combined with optimal PROs at Mo 4 sustained their response at Mo 13, and at both Mo 13 and Mo 21 in the 2–5-yr and 6–17-yr cohorts (Table 1). Across the cohorts, 33–88% of pts maintained a combined JADAS27 MDA with optimal PRO responses through Mo 21. Where estimable, median times to combined efficacy and specific optimal PRO responses were consistent across the cohorts (Table 2; Figs 1, 2).

Table 1.

Proportion of pts with combined efficacy and optimal PRO responses at Mos 4, 13 and 21

EndpointResponders at Mo 4Responders at Mos 4 and 13*Responders at Mos 4, 13 and 21*2–5 yrs (n=46)6–17 yrs (n=173)2–5 yrs6–17 yrs2–5 yrs6–17 yrsJADAS27 MDA and CHAQ-DI=09 (20)34 (20)5/9 (56)25/34 (74)3/9 (33)16/34 (47)JADAS27 MDA and PaGA ≤18 (17)14 (8)8/8 (100)7/14 (50)7/8 (88)5/14 (36)JADAS27 MDA and Pain VAS <35 mm28 (61)70 (41)25/28 (89)58/70 (83)21/28 (75)43/70 (61)JADAS27 ID and CHAQ-DI=07 (15)20 (12)2/7 (29)13/20 (65)1/7 (14)9/20 (45)JADAS27 ID and PaGA ≤16 (13)10 (6)4/6 (67)4/10 (40)4/6 (67)4/10 (40)JADAS27 ID and Pain VAS <35 mm17 (37)31 (18)10/17 (59)22/31 (71)8/17 (47)17/31 (55)

Data are n (%) or n/N (%). *% based on n of pts who achieved response at Mo 4 (denominator)

Table 2.

Kaplan–Meier estimates for median (95% CI) times (mos) to achieving combined efficacy and optimal PRO responses

Endpoint2–5 yrs6–17 yrsJADAS27 MDA and CHAQ-DI=021.5 (6.8, NE)21.5 (13.1, 24.4)JADAS27 MDA and PaGA ≤1NE (15.9, NE)24.6 (24.3, NE)JADAS27 MDA and Pain VAS <35 mm2.8 (1.9, 2.9)3.8 (3.7, 6.6)JADAS27 ID and CHAQ-DI=0NE (18.4, NE)24.4 (18.7, NE)JADAS27 ID and PaGA ≤1NE (21.3, NE)24.6 (24.3, NE)JADAS27 ID and Pain VAS <35 mm3.8 (3.8, 10.3)13.2 (10.3, 15.9)

NE=not estimable

Conclusion:

Many individuals with pJIA who achieved stringent efficacy and PRO measures with weekly SC abatacept by Mo 4 sustained them over 2 years. Time to achieve combined efficacy and Pain VAS <35 response was shorter than that for PaGA ≤1 and CHAQ-DI=0.

References:

[1]Ruperto N, et al.Ann Rheum Dis2019;78:99–100 (abstr OP0056)

[2]Brunner H, et al.Arthritis Rheumatol2019;71(suppl 10):abstr 2707

[3]Ruperto N, et al.Ann Rheum Dis2017;76:75 (abstr OP0058)

[4]Brunner HI, et al.Arthritis Rheumatol2018;70:1144–54

Acknowledgments:

Katerina Kumpan, PhD, Caudex; funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb

Disclosure of Interests: :

Hermine Brunner Consultant of: Hoffman-La Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Aventis, Merck Serono, AbbVie, Amgen, Alter, AstraZeneca, Baxalta Biosimilars, Biogen Idec, Boehringer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, EMD Serono, Janssen, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Biosciences, Speakers bureau: GSK, Roche, and Novartis, Nikolay Tzaribachev: None declared, Ingrid Louw Consultant of: Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche (advisory boards), Inmaculada Calvo Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clementia, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-La Roche, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-La Roche, Novartis, Francisco Zapata: None declared, Gerd Horneff Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bayer, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Daniel Kingsbury: None declared, Maria Gastanaga Grant/research support from: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Roche, Carine Wouters Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Roche, Johannes Breedt: None declared, Robert Wong Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Marleen Nys Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Margarita Askelson Consultant of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Joe Zhuo Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Alberto Martini Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lily, EMD Serono, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Daniel J Lovell Consultant of: Abbott (consulting and PI), AbbVie (PI), Amgen (consultant and DSMC Chairperson), AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb (PI), Celgene, Forest Research (DSMB Chairman), GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-La Roche, Janssen (co-PI), Novartis (consultant and PI), Pfizer (consultant and PI), Roche (PI), Takeda, UBC (consultant and PI), Wyeth, Employee of: Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Speakers bureau: Wyeth, Nicolino Ruperto Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lily, F Hoffmann-La Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sobi (paid to institution), Consultant of: Ablynx, AbbVie, AstraZeneca-Medimmune, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lily, EMD Serono, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, R-Pharma, Sanofi, Servier, Sinergie, Sobi, Takeda, Speakers bureau: Ablynx, AbbVie, AstraZeneca-Medimmune, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lily, EMD Serono, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, R-Pharma, Sanofi, Servier, Sinergie, Sobi, Takeda

FRI0454 UNDER DETECTION OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN JUVENILE SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (JSSC) UTILIZING PULMONARY FUNCTION TESTS. RESULTS FROM THE JUVENILE SCLERODERMA INCEPTION COHORT

Background:

Juvenile systemic sclerosis (jSSc) is an orphan disease with a prevalence in around 3 in a million children. Pulmonary involvement in jSSc occurs in approximately 40 % in the inception cohort. Traditionally in jSSc, pulmonary function testing (PFT) with FVC and DLCO are used for screening and computed tomography (HRCT) was more reserved for those with abnormal PFTs. More recently, it has become apparent that PFTs might not be sensitive enough for detecting ILD in children.

Objectives:

Utilizing a prospective international juvenile systemic scleroderma cohort (JSScC) [2], to determine if pulmonary screening with FVC and DLCO is sufficient enough to assess the presence of interstitial lung disease in comparison to CT evaluation.

Methods:

The international juvenile systemic scleroderma cohort database was queried for available patients with recorded PFT parameters and HRCT performed to determine sensitivity of PFTs detecting disease process.

Results:

Of 129 patients in the jSScC, 67 patients had both CT imaging and an FVC reading from PFTs for direct comparison. DLCO readings were also captured but not in as many patients with tandem HRCT (n =55 DCLO and HRCT scan). Therefore, initial analyses focused on the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the FVC value from the PFTs to capture the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease as determined by HRCT.

Overall, 49% of the patients had ILD determined by HRCT, with 60% of patients having normal FVC (>80%) with positive HRCT findings, and 24% of patients having normal DLCO (> 80%) with positive HRCT findings. Fourteen percent (n = 3/21) of patients with both FVC and DLCO values within the normal range had a positive HRCT finding.

Conclusion:

The sensitivity of the FVC in the JSScC cohort in detecting ILD was only 39%. Relying on PFTs alone for screening for ILD in juvenile systemic sclerosis would have missed the detection of ILD in almost 2/3 of the sample cohort, supporting the use of HRCT for detection of ILD in children with SSc. In addition, the cut off utilized, of less than 80% of predicted FVC or DLCO could be too low for pediatric patients to exclude beginning ILD. This pilot data needs confirmation in a larger patient population.

Supported by the “Joachim Herz Stiftung”

Disclosure of Interests:

Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Bernd Hinrichs: None declared, Kathryn Torok: None declared, Maria Jose Santos Speakers bureau: Novartis and Pfizer, Ozgur Kasapcopur: None declared, Amra Adrovic: None declared, Valda Stanevicha: None declared, Flávio R. Sztajnbok: None declared, Maria T. Terreri: None declared, Ana Paula Sakamoto: None declared, Ekaterina Alexeeva Grant/research support from: Roche, Pfizer, Centocor, Novartis, Speakers bureau: Roche, Novartis, Pfizer., Jordi Anton Grant/research support from: grants from Pfizer, abbvie, Novartis, Sobi. Gebro, Roche, Novimmune, Sanofi, Lilly, Amgen, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, abbvie, Novartis, Sobi. Gebro, Roche, Novimmune, Sanofi, Lilly, Amgen, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Pfizer, abbvie, Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Pfizer, abbvie, Speakers bureau: abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Sobi, Gebro, Speakers bureau: abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Sobi, Gebro, Maria Katsikas: None declared, Vanessa Smith Grant/research support from: The affiliated company received grants from Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgian Fund for Scientific Research in Rheumatic diseases (FWRO), Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and Janssen-Cilag NV, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co, Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and UCB Biopharma Sprl, Rolando Cimaz: None declared, Mikhail Kostik: None declared, Simone Appenzeller: None declared, Mahesh Janarthanan: None declared, Monika Moll: None declared, Dana Nemcova: None declared, Dieneke Schonenberg: None declared, Cristina Battagliotti: None declared, Lillemor Berntson Consultant of: paid by Abbvie as a consultant, Speakers bureau: paid by Abbvie for giving speaches about JIA, Blanca Bica: None declared, Juergen Brunner Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Novartis, Consultant of: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, Patricia Costa Reis: None declared, Despina Eleftheriou: None declared, Liora Harel: None declared, Gerd Horneff Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bayer, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Dragana Lazarevic: None declared, Kirsten Minden Consultant of: GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Speakers bureau: Roche, Susan Nielsen: None declared, Farzana Nuruzzaman: None declared, Anjali Patwardhan: None declared, Yosef Uziel: None declared, Nicola Helmus: None declared

Treat-to-target study for improved outcome in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is one of the most prevalent chronic inflammatory diseases in children. Evidence suggests that early effective treatment minimises the burden of disease during childhood and in further life. We hypothesise that a guided treat-to-target (T2T) approach is superior to routine care in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) in terms of reaching a clinical remission after 12 months of treatment.

METHODS

Patients with early and active pJIA were enrolled. Targets for treatment were the following: Recognisable Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) improvement after 3 months, acceptable disease at 6 months, minimal disease activity at 9 months and as primary endpoint remission after 12 months. Initially, patients received methotrexate. Failure to meet a defined target required treatment modification at the specified intervals. The choice of biologics was not influenced by the protocol. Finally, T2T patients were compared with a cohort of matched controls of patients with pJIA with unguided therapy documented by BIKER.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were enrolled. Treatment targets after 3/6/9 and 12 months were reached by 73%/75%/77% and 48% of patients. Fifty-four patients completed the protocol. Compared with matched controls, on T2T guidance significantly more patients reached JADAS remission (48% vs 32%; OR 1.96 (1.1-3.7); p=0.033) and JADAS minimal disease activity (JADAS-MDA) (76% vs 59%; OR 2.2 (1.1-4.4); p=0.028). Patients from the T2T cohort received a biologic significantly more frequent (50% vs 9% after 12 months; OR 9.8 (4.6-20.8); p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The T2T concept was feasible and superior to unguided treatment. High rates of patients reached JADAS-MDA and JADA remission after 12 months. Approximately half of the patients achieved their therapy goals without a biologic.

The European network for care of children with paediatric rheumatic diseases: care across borders

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of the paediatric rheumatology (PR) services in Europe, describe current delivery of care and training, set standards for care, identify unmet needs and inform future specialist service provision.

METHODS

An online survey was developed and presented to national coordinating centres of the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) (country survey) and to individual PR centres (centre and disease surveys) as a part of the European Union (EU) Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe project. The survey contained components covering the organization of PR care, composition of teams, education, health care and research facilities and assessment of needs.

RESULTS

Response rates were 29/35 (83%) for country surveys and 164/288 (57%) for centre surveys. Across the EU, approximately one paediatric rheumatologist is available per million population. In all EU member states there is good access to specialist care and medications, although biologic drug availability is worse in Eastern European countries. PR education is widely available for physicians but is insufficient for allied health professionals. The ability to participate in clinical trials is generally high. Important gaps were identified, including lack of standardized clinical guidelines/recommendations and insufficient adolescent transition management planning.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a comprehensive description of current specialist PR service provision across Europe and did not reveal any major differences between EU member states. Rarity, chronicity and complexity of diseases are major challenges to PR care. Future work should facilitate the development, dissemination and implementation of standards of care, treatment and service recommendations to further improve patient-centred health care across Europe.

Correction to: Proposal for a definition for response to treatment, inactive disease and damage for JIA associated uveitis based on the validation of a uveitis related JIA outcome measures from the Multinational Interdisciplinary Working Group for Uveitis in Childhood (MIWGUC)

Following publication of the original article [1], we have been notified that the author Joan Calzada should not have been included to the team of authors. The authors' team, thus, should be as follows.

The identification and management of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: evidence-based European consensus statements

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) carries a high mortality risk; expert guidance is required to aid early recognition and treatment. We aimed to develop the first expert consensus and define an algorithm for the identification and management of the condition through application of well established methods.

METHODS

Evidence-based consensus statements for systemic sclerosis-associated ILD management were established for six domains (ie, risk factors, screening, diagnosis and severity assessment, treatment initiation and options, disease progression, and treatment escalation) using a modified Delphi process based on a systematic literature analysis. A panel of 27 Europe-based pulmonologists, rheumatologists, and internists with expertise in systemic sclerosis-associated ILD participated in three rounds of online surveys, a face-to-face discussion, and a WebEx meeting, followed by two supplemental Delphi rounds, to establish consensus and define a management algorithm. Consensus was considered achieved if at least 80% of panellists indicated agreement or disagreement.

FINDINGS

Between July 1, 2018, and Aug 27, 2019, consensus agreement was reached for 52 primary statements and six supplemental statements across six domains of management, and an algorithm was defined for clinical practice use. The agreed statements most important for clinical use included: all patients with systemic sclerosis should be screened for systemic sclerosis-associated ILD using high-resolution CT; high-resolution CT is the primary tool for diagnosing ILD in systemic sclerosis; pulmonary function tests support screening and diagnosis; systemic sclerosis-associated ILD severity should be measured with more than one indicator; it is appropriate to treat all severe cases; no pharmacological treatment is an option for some patients; follow-up assessments enable identification of disease progression; progression pace, alongside disease severity, drives decisions to escalate treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Through a robust modified Delphi process developed by a diverse panel of experts, the first evidence-based consensus statements were established on guidance for the identification and medical management of systemic sclerosis-associated ILD.

FUNDING

An unrestricted grant from Boehringer Ingelheim International.

Time of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Start in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and the Likelihood of a Drug-Free Remission in Young Adulthood

OBJECTIVE

To study juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) long-term outcomes in relation to the time of initiation of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD).

METHODS

Outcomes of JIA patients prospectively followed by the Biologika in der Kinderrheumatologie (BiKeR) and Juvenile Arthritis Methotrexate/Biologics Long-Term Observation (JuMBO) registers were analyzed with regard to drug-free remission and inactive disease, functional status and quality of life, and surgery. To analyze the influence of early bDMARD therapy on outcomes, patients were assigned to 3 groups based on the time from symptom onset to bDMARD start (G1: ≤2 years, G2: >2 to ≤5 years, and G3: >5 years). Propensity score-adjusted outcome differences were analyzed by multinomial logistic regression analyses among the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 701 JIA patients were observed for mean ± SD 9.1 ± 3.7 years. At the last follow-up (disease duration mean ± SD 14.3 ± 6.1 years), 11.7% of patients were in drug-free remission, and 40.0% had inactive disease. More than half of the patients reported no functional limitation, while 5% had undergone arthroplasty, and 3% had eye surgery. At the 10-year time point, patients in G1 (n = 108) were significantly more likely to be in drug-free remission than those patients who began treatment later (G2, n = 199; G3, n = 259), with 18.5%, 10.1%, and 4.9%, respectively. Patients in G1 had significantly lower disease activity (clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 10 joints = 4.9), a better overall well-being (18.2% patient global assessment score = 0), and higher functional status (59.2% Health Assessment Questionnaire score = 0), compared to patients in G3 (7.1, 8.4%, and 43.7%, respectively). G1 patients required arthroplasty significantly less frequently than G3 patients and had significantly lower disease activity over time than patients in both G2 and G3.

CONCLUSION

Early DMARD treatment is associated with better disease control and outcomes, which supports the concept of a "window of opportunity" for JIA.

Update on the Systemic Treatment of Pediatric Localized Scleroderma

Juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS) is an orphan disease that can lead to cosmetic disfiguration and orthopedic problems. Two recent publications review the current recommendations regarding diagnosis, assessment, follow up and treatment of pediatric localized scleroderma cases, both of which suggest the Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool as an important instrument to assess activity and damage. This review focuses on the systemic treatment of jLS. Systemic treatment includes synthetic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Systemic therapy is indicated if the lesion crosses any joint, or leads to potential cosmetic disfiguration or orthopedic problems. The only controlled trial of systemic treatment has shown the efficacy of methotrexate, which is the first choice of treatment. It appears superior to phototherapy according to a recently published meta-analysis. In case of methotrexate intolerance, mycophenolate mofetil is an option. In case of methotrexate nonresponse, addition of mycophenolate mofetil, tocilizumab or abatacept seems to be effective. Future treatment options derived and extrapolated from adult trials regarding treatment of skin involvement of systemic scleroderma or fibrosis are promising, as the final pathway in the skin seems to be similar in both diseases.

Biologic Therapies in Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Comparison of Long-Term Safety Data from the German BIKER Registry

Objective

Biologics have an important role in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Long‐term safety data are limited. Direct comparison of different agents regarding occurrence of adverse events (AEs), especially of rare events, requires large quantities of patient years. In this analysis, long‐term safety with regard to AE of special interest (AESI) was compared between different biologics.

Methods

Patients with nonsystemic JIA were selected from the German BIKER registry. Safety assessments were based on AE reports. Number of AEs, serious AEs, and 25 predefined AESIs, including medically important infection, uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, cytopenia, hepatic events, anaphylaxis, depression, pregnancy, malignancy, and death, were analyzed. Event rates and relative risks were calculated using AEs reported after first dose through 70 days after last dose.

Results

A total of 3873 patients entered the analysis with 7467 years of exposure to biologics. The most common AESIs were uveitis (n = 231) and medically important infections (n = 101). Cytopenia and elevation of transaminases were more frequent with tocilizumab (risk ratio [RR] 8.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2‐15, and RR 4.7, 95% CI 1.8‐12.2, respectively). Anaphylactic events were associated with intravenous route of administration. In patients ever exposed to biologics, eight malignancies were reported. Six pregnancies have been documented in patients with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. No death occurred in this patient cohort during observation.

Conclusion

Surveillance of pharmacotherapy as provided by the BIKER registry is an import approach, especially for long‐term treatment of children. Overall, tolerance was acceptable. Differences between biologics were noted and should be considered in daily patient care.

Validation and adaptation of a German screening tool to identify patients at risk of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

The primary objective was twofold: (1) to determine whether the German version of a screening instrument for clinical practice for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SICJIA) is reliable in identifying patients at risk for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and (2) secondly whether a weighting scheme of individual questions improves its sensitivity. Data were collected and retrospectively analyzed based upon completed SICJIA questionnaires from patients and their guardians at their first clinical visit at the Hamburg Centre for Pediatric and Adolescence Rheumatology. All patients visited the center between August 2015 and July 2017. The survey included 12 disease-orientated questions. For evaluation, only questionnaires of patients diagnosed with JIA or with a non-inflammatory joint pain (NJP) were selected. Standard statistical techniques were used for evaluation. In total, 165 of 800 questionnaires could be used for evaluation. Of the 800 patients who completed questionnaires, 133 were diagnosed with JIA and 32 with NJP. The analysis of the individual questions was performed by comparing the rate of a positive response to the questions between the two groups. Four questions showed a significant difference by comparing the groups, using JIA patients with at least one active joint. The diagnostic accuracy of the weighted sum score increased from 64 to 68% to discriminate between the groups in comparison to the ordinary sum score. An optimal cutoff of 6.0 for referral to a pediatric rheumatologist was calculated. The validation of the SICJIA showed a discriminative difference in patients with clinical diagnosed JIA and a control group diagnosed with NJP. The weighted sum score performed better to differentiate between JIA and NJP patients. The modified SICJIA can be useful to identify patients at risk of JIA.

Proposal for a definition for response to treatment, inactive disease and damage for JIA associated uveitis based on the validation of a uveitis related JIA outcome measures from the Multinational Interdisciplinary Working Group for Uveitis in Childhood (MIWGUC)

BACKGROUND

JIA-associated uveitis (JIAU) is a serious, sight-threatening disease with significant long-term complications and risk of blindness, even with improved contemporary treatments. The MIWGUC was set up in order to propose specific JIAU activity and response items and to validate their applicability for clinical outcome studies.

METHODS

The group consists of 8 paediatric rheumatologists and 7 ophthalmologists. A consensus meeting took place on November 2015 in Barcelona (Spain) with the objective of validating the previously proposed measures. The validation process was based on the results of a prospective open, international, multi-centre, cohort study designed to validate the outcome measures proposed by the initial MIWGUC group meeting in 2012. The meeting used the same Delphi and nominal group technique as previously described in the first paper from the MIWGUC group (Arthritis Care Res 64:1365-72, 2012). Patients were included with a diagnosis of JIA, aged less than 18 years, and with active uveitis or an uveitis flare which required treatment with a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug. The proposed outcome measures for uveitis were collected by an ophthalmologist and for arthritis by a paediatric rheumatologist. Patient reported outcome measures were also measured.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were enrolled into the validation cohort. Fifty four percent (n = 44) had persistent oligoarthritis followed by rheumatoid factor negative polyarthritis (n = 15, 18%). The mean uveitis disease duration was 3.3 years (SD 3.0). Bilateral eye involvement was reported in 65 (79.3%) patients. The main findings are that the most significant changes, from baseline to 6 months, are found in the AC activity measures of cells and flare. These measures correlate with the presence of pre-existing structural complications and this has implications for the reporting of trials using a single measure as a primary outcome. We also found that visual analogue scales of disease activity showed significant change when reported by the ophthalmologist, rheumatologist and families. The measures formed three relatively distinct groups. The first group of measures comprised uveitis activity, ocular damage and the ophthalmologists' VAS. The second comprised patient reported outcomes including disruption to school attendance. The third group consisted of the rheumatologists' VAS and the joint score.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose distinctive and clinically significant measures of disease activity, severity and damage for JIAU. This effort is the initial step for developing a comprehensive outcome measures for JIAU, which incorporates the perspectives of rheumatologists, ophthalmologists, patients and families.