Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy in head and neck cancers. Feasibility study of a French cooperative group

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the feasibility of pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy to mimic the continuous low dose rate (cLDR) iridium wire technique in head and neck carcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A series of 30 patients were included from June 1995 to May 1998. The primaries were located in the oral cavity (four T1, seven T2 and two T3), the velotonsillar arch (eight T1 and eight T2) and the posterior wall (one T3). Thirteen were irradiated by exclusive brachytherapy (dose, > or =45 Gy). The PDR delivered 0.5 Gy/pulse, one pulse/h, day and night, to mimic cLDR irradiation.

RESULTS

The implantation was feasible for all the patients, usually easy and of good quality. The mean duration/pulse was 13 min, with a mean source activity of 171 mCi. Patient tolerance was poor in nine cases. Sixteen patients could receive the whole PDR treatment with a total ranging from 30 to 120 pulses without any problem. Seven had short breakdowns (< or =6 h). Seven had definitive breakdowns, but could end the irradiation by manual afterloading of iridium 192 wires. The radioprotection was better (or complete), except for one patient. Most of the breakdowns were related to kinking or flattering of the tube.

CONCLUSIONS

PDR is feasible in head and neck carcinomas, but necessitates improvement of the quality and control of the plastic tubes.

[Radiotherapy of brain astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas of the adult]

Gliomas are moderately radiosensitive. The main prognostic factors are the anatomicopathological type and grade of glioma, the performance status, age of the patient and the extent of the surgery. According to data from the literature, high-grade gliomas should be given 60 Gy in five weekly fractions of 1.7 to 2 Gy in a volume including tumor or tumor bed, edema and a 2- to 3-cm margin. A dose of 45 Gy would be sufficient for low-grade gliomas, according to the results of a recent randomized EORTC trial. Brachytherapy and radiosurgery techniques may be indicated in selected cases.

[Effect of Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761) on rats in an experimental model of acute encephalopathy after total body irradiation]

PURPOSE

To define the therapeutic effect of Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761) in an experimental model of acute encephalopathy following total body irradiation in rats.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety four-month-old rats received 4.5 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) at day 1 while 15 rats received sham irradiation. A behavioural study based on a conditioning test of negative reinforcement, the one-way avoidance test, was performed test, was performed after irradiation. Orally treatment was started one day (study A) or twenty two days (study B) after irradiation and repeated daily for twelve days. In the irradiated group, three subgroups were defined according to the treatment received: EGb 761 (50 mg/kg), EGb 761 (100 mg/kg), water.

RESULTS

This work comprised two consecutive studies. In study A (45 rats) the one-way avoidance test was administered daily from day 7 to day 14. In study B (45 rats) the behavioural test was performed from day 28 to day 35. Study A (three groups of 15 rats): following TBI, irradiated rats treated with water demonstrated a significant delay in a learning the one-way avoidance test in comparison with sham-irradiated rats (P < 0.0002) or irradiated rats treated with EGb 761 (50 mg/kg; P < 0.0017) or EGb 761 (100 mg/kg; P < 0.0002). The irradiated rats, treated with EGb 761 (50 or 100 mg/kg) did not differ from the sham-irradiated controls. Study B (three groups of 15 rats): the irradiated rats, treated with water or EGb 761 (50 or 100 mg/kg) did not differ from the sham-irradiated controls.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that a relatively low dose of total body irradiation induces a substantial acute learning dysfunction in the rat, which persists fourteen days after TBI. This effect is prevented by the administration of EGb 761 (50 or 100 mg/kg) started twenty-four hours after irradiation.

[Postmastectomy locoregional radiotherapy for breast cancer: literature review]

Postoperative radiotherapy is controversial after radical mastectomy. Recent clinical trials have shown an increase in survival with this irradiation and conclusions of previous meta-analyses should be reconsidered. The results of a large number of randomized clinical trials in which women received post-mastectomy radiotherapy or not have been reviewed. These trials showed a decrease in locoregional failure with the use of postoperative radiotherapy but survival advantages have not been clearly identified. A larger number of randomized clinical trials compared postoperative radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone and the association of the two treatments. They showed that chemotherapy was less active locally than radiotherapy and that radiotherapy and chemotherapy significantly increased both disease-free and overall survival rates in the groups which received postoperative radiotherapy. These favourable results were, however, obtained with optimal radiotherapy techniques and a relative sparing of lung tissue and cardiac muscle. Many retrospective clinical analyses concluded that results obtained in locoregional failure rate were poor and that these failures led to an increase in future risks. Both radiotherapy and systemic treatment should be delivered after mastectomy, reserved for patients with a high risk of locoregional relapses, particularly of nodes and/or tumors with a diameter > or = 5 cm. However, radiotherapy could produce secondary effects, and techniques of radiotherapy should be optimal.