Early growth response-1 gene: potential radiation response gene marker in prostate cancer

This study was undertaken to determine whether the transcription factor EGR-1 expression: (1) in the primary tumor, correlates with radiation response in terms of complete local tumor control with no evidence of disease or recurrence and no evidence of metastasis; (2) in the postirradiated biopsies correlates with residual tumor; and (3) correlates with the expression of Egr-1 target genes such as TP53, pRB, and Bax. The authors analyzed: (1) 25 pretreated surgically resected paraffin-embedded primary adenocarcinomas of the prostate for the presence of EGR-1 expression and mutation, and correlated this with clinical endpoints such as serum prostate-specific antigen levels and current clinical status; (2) 27 postirradiated biopsies of prostate for the presence of EGR-1 expression, and correlated these findings to the residual tumor status; and (3) 12 prospective prostate tumor specimens for EGR-1 expression and its target genes. EGR-1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry and mutations were screened in two regions of the Egr-1 gene (trinucleotide AGC repeats in transactivation domain [TD] and poly A tract in 3'UTR) by polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformational polymorphism analysis. Of 25 patients, 18 patients showed expression of EGR-1. EGR-1 overexpression correlated with treatment failure. No correlation with EGR-1 overexpression and its target genes was found, which may indirectly suggest that overexpressed EGR-1 may lack transactivation function. In summary, EGR-1 overexpression in the mutant form may provide an indication of clinical failure (local recurrence or metastasis).

Low dose preoperative radiation in the treatment of carcinoma of the rectum

Recent advances in the treatment of cancer of the rectum show a steady improvement in survival. Newer surgical techniques and expanding options for adjunctive therapy appear to have had a significant impact on improving both local control and distant disease. Five-year survival of patients now ranges from 85-90% for stage I cancers and 50-55% for stage III cancers. Local recurrence of disease following curative surgical resections is dependent on the stage of the tumor and for some high-risk patients, stages T3/T4 and N+ disease, has been reported as high as 40-60%. In an attempt to lower the rate of local recurrence and improve survival, several approaches to adjuvant therapy have been utilized. Preoperative radiation was one approach that has been used extensively in the last decades. Recently, the large Swedish randomized studies using a short course (5 Gy x 5) of preoperative radiation have reported a clear improvement in local control and survival of patients. These results were achieved with no downstaging of disease since surgery was performed put immediately after irradiation. Therefore it should be presumed that preoperative radiation therapy resulted in the sterilization of tumor cells, which prevented both local and distant dissemination leading to the improved outcome. The question remains, therefore, as to what is the least and/or the most appropriate dose of preoperative irradiation that can achieve the beneficial effect of minimizing tumor cell dissemination at surgery. Low dose preoperative irradiation as a single fraction of 500 cGy appears to have a sound biological basis and in single institutional studies it was shown to be effective but in randomized studies it did not improve results. This is likely to be due to a poor design of trials and/or inappropriate patient selection for these studies. A well-designed study still remains to be done.

High-dose intra-arterial cisplatin boost with hyperfractionated radiation therapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

PURPOSE

To evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of intra-arterial (IA) cisplatin boost with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX-RT) in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients with locally advanced primary SCCHN were treated on consecutive phase I/II studies of HFX-RT (receiving a total of 76.8 to 81.6 Gy, given at 1.2 Gy bid) and IA cisplatin (150 mg/m(2) received at the start of and during RT boost treatment).

RESULTS

Acute grade 3 to 4 toxicities were as follows: grade 4 and grade 3 mucosal toxicity occurred in three (7%) and 31 patients (69%), respectively, and grade 3 hematologic, infectious, and skin events occurred in one patient each. Eight of 24 patients (33%) were unable to receive a second planned dose of IA cisplatin because of general anxiety (n = 5), nausea and/or emesis (n = 2), or asymptomatic occlusion of an external carotid artery (n = 1). Thirty-seven patients (88%) experienced complete response (CR) at primary site. Twenty-nine (85%) of 34 patients presenting with nodal disease experienced CR. The actuarial 2-year rates of locoregional control and disease-specific and overall survival are 73%, 63%, and 57%, respectively, with a median active follow-up of 30 months.

CONCLUSION

In this highly unfavorable subset of patients, these results seem superior to previously reported chemoradiation regimens in more favorable patients. Use of a second dose of IA cisplatin boost was associated with increased toxicity without obvious therapeutic gain. This novel strategy allows for an incremental increase in the treatment intensity of the HFX-RT regimen recently established as superior to once-a-day RT.

Ionizing radiation down-regulates p53 protein in primary Egr-1-/- mouse embryonic fibroblast cells causing enhanced resistance to apoptosis

In this study, we sought to investigate the mechanism of the proapoptotic function of Egr-1 in relation to p53 status in normal isogenic cell backgrounds by using primary MEF cells established from homozygous (Egr-1(-/-)) and heterozygous (Egr-1(+/-)) Egr-1 knock-out mice. Ionizing radiation caused significantly enhanced apoptosis in Egr-1(+/-) cells (22.8%; p < 0.0001) when compared with Egr-1(-/-) cells (3.5%). Radiation elevated p53 protein in Egr-1(+/-) cells in 3-6 h. However, in Egr-1(-/-) cells, the p53 protein was down-regulated 1 h after radiation and was completely degraded at the later time points. Radiation elevated the p53-CAT activity in Egr-1(+/-) cells but not in Egr-1(-/-) cells. Interestingly, transient overexpression of EGR-1 in p53(-/-) MEF cells caused marginal induction of radiation-induced apoptosis when compared with p53(+/+) MEF cells. Together, these results indicate that Egr-1 may transregulate p53, and both EGR-1 and p53 functions are essential to mediate radiation-induced apoptosis. Rb, an Egr-1 target gene, forms a trimeric complex with p53 and MDM2 to prevent MDM2-mediated p53 degradation. Low levels of Rb including hypophosphorylated forms were observed in Egr-1(-/-) MEF cells before and after radiation when compared with the levels observed in Egr-1(+/-) cells. Elevated amounts of the p53-MDM2 complex and low amounts of Rb-MDM-2 complex were observed in Egr-1(-/-) cells after radiation. Because of a reduction in Rb binding to MDM2 and an increase in MDM2 binding with p53, p53 is directly degraded by MDM2, and this leads to inactivation of the p53-mediated apoptotic pathway in Egr-1(-/-) MEF cells. Thus, the proapoptotic function of Egr-1 may involve the mediation of Rb protein that is essential to overcome the antiapoptotic function of MDM2 on p53.

The prognostic significance of midline shift at presentation on survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme

PURPOSE

While patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) who present with midline shift have a presumably worse prognosis, there is little literature evaluating the prognostic significance of this presentation in multivariate analysis in the context of other known prognostic factors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From March 1981 to September 1993, 219 patients underwent irradiation for intracranial glioma at our institution. One hundred fourteen patients with a diagnosis of a primary GBM were analyzed for the influence of the presence of midline shift at diagnosis on survival with respect to other known prognostic factors, including age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and extent of surgery. Eighty-five patients (74%) presented with midline shift. Surgical treatment consisted of subtotal/total resection in 86 patients (75%). Among patients presenting with midline shift, 68 (80%) underwent subtotal/total resection before irradiation.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis of the entire cohort of patients found none of the potential prognostic factors analyzed to significantly influence survival. The overall median survival was 6 months. However, when multivariate analysis was limited to patients with a KPS of > or = 70, only the presence of midline shift and age were found to significantly influence survival. Patients with a KPS > or = 70 and with midline shift present at diagnosis had a median survival of 8 months, as compared to 14 months for those not having midline shift at presentation (p = 0.04). Patients with a KPS > or = 70 and age > 50 years had a median survival of 5 months as compared to 11 months for those < or = 50 (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In this series, where 80% of patients who presented with a midline shift underwent decompressive resection of GBM before irradiation, the presence of midline shift at diagnosis remained an independent prognostic factor influencing survival among good performance status patients. While the role of decompressive surgery in this setting is likely of some benefit, the extent of this benefit remains to be defined.

Prognostic significance of postchemoradiation stage following preoperative chemotherapy and radiation for advanced/recurrent rectal cancers

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic significance of postchemoradiation pathologic stage and implications for further therapy following preoperative chemoradiation and surgery for advanced/recurrent rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventy-seven patients with advanced (fixed or tethered T4) or recurrent rectal cancer were treated with preoperative chemoradation followed by surgical resection of disease. Chemotherapy consisted of either of bolus 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) per day or continuous venous infusion 225 mg/m(2) per day for the duration of radiation. Radiation therapy was planned to be delivered to the whole pelvis to a dose of 45 Gy followed by a boost to the area of the tumor of 5-15 Gy. Total radiation doses ranged from 40 to 63 Gy with a median of 55.8 Gy. Surgical resection was then carried out 6-10 weeks following the completion of treatment (median, 7 weeks). Twenty-eight patients underwent abdominoperineal resection and and 49 patients had sphincter-sparing surgical procedures. None of the patients received postoperative chemotherapy. Follow-up in these patients ranges from 1 year to 8 years with a median of 3 years.

RESULTS

Significant downstaging of disease was observed with 12/77 (16%) having no residual disease(pT0) and 13% (10/77) found to have pT1-2, N0 disease, 31% (24/77) with pT3-4, N0 and 40% (31/77) for pT0-4, N1-2 cancers. Survival by pathologic stage was 100% for pT0-2, N0 cancers, 80% for pT3-4, N0 and 73% for pTx, N1-2. Local recurrence of disease was observed in 0% of patients with pT0-2, N0 as compared with 13% (3/24) in pT3-4, N0 and 16% (5/31) in pT0-4, N1-2 patients.

CONCLUSION

Downstaging following preoperative chemoradiation is a significant prognostic factor. Patients with pT0, T1, or T2 disease have an excellent prognosis and are unlikely to fail locally or with systemic disease. However, patient with T3/T4 or N+ disease may benefit from further adjuvant chemotherapy.

Low dose fractionated radiation enhances the radiosensitization effect of paclitaxel in colorectal tumor cells with mutant p53

BACKGROUND

The current study was undertaken to investigate the influence of wild-type or mutant p53 status on the radiosensitizing effect of paclitaxel in colorectal tumor cell lines.

METHODS

HCT-116 (contains wild-type p53) and HT-29 (contains mutant p53) established from moderately differentiated colorectal carcinomas were used in this study. Colony-forming assay was performed after exposure to either different radiation doses (0.5-6 gray [Gy]) or paclitaxel (1-10 nM) or in combination. Induction of p53 and p21(waf1/cip1) by these treatments were determined by immunocytochemistry and Western blot analysis.

RESULTS

Radiation caused an increase in nuclear p53 and p21(waf1/cip1) proteins in HCT-116 cells, indicating that p53 functionally induced p21(waf1/cip1). However, induction of nuclear p53 and p21(waf1/cip1) protein was not evident in HT-29 cells, suggesting that p53 was not functional in these cells. Survival data showed that the HCT-116 cells (survival fraction of exponentially growing cells that were irradiated at the clinically relevant dose of 2 Gy [SF(2)] = 0.383; dose required to reduce the fraction of cells to 37% [D(0)] = 223 centigray [cGy]) were significantly sensitive to ionizing radiation (P < 0.008) when compared with the HT-29 cells (SF(2) = 0.614; D(0) = 351 cGy). Paclitaxel caused a higher degree of clonogenic inhibition in HCT-116 (D(0) = 0.7 nM) than HT-29 (D(0) = 1.11 nM) cells (P < 0.06). When paclitaxel and radiation were combined, an enhanced radiosensitizing effect (P < 0.05) was observed in HCT-116 cells (SF(2) = 0.138; D(0) = 103 cGy), whereas in HT-29 cells no significant radiosensitization of paclitaxel was observed (SF(2) = 0.608; D(0) = 306 cGy). However, pretreatment with paclitaxel followed by multifractionated low dose radiation (0.5- or 1-Gy fractions for a total dose of 2 Gy) significantly enhanced the radiosensitizing effect in both HCT-116 and HT-29 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study suggested that multifractionated radiation given at very low doses after exposure of cells to paclitaxel conferred a potent radiation sensitizing effect irrespective of p53 status.

The feasibility of dose escalation using concurrent radiation and 5-fluorouracil therapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma

We evaluated the feasibility of dose escalation using external beam radiation therapy (RT) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma. Fourteen patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for stage I-III adenocarcinoma of the pancreas received postoperative high-dose chemoradiation. RT was given at 1.8-Gy daily fractions to total doses of 54 Gy for patients with negative surgical margins (n = 12), and 64.8 Gy for those with gross residual disease (n = 2). Concurrent 5-FU was given as a continuous infusion (CI) at 225 mg/m2 per day (n = 9) beginning or day 1 and continuing until the completion of RT, or by bolus injection at 500 mg/m2 per day (n = 5) during weeks 1 and 4 of RT. Follow-up ranged from 32 to 36 months (median, 35 months). All patients were able to complete the planned high-dose postoperative chemoradiation and none required a treatment break. No grade 4 acute toxicity was observed. Grade 3 acute toxicity was limited to 2 patients. Two patients developed grade 3 (n = 1) or 4 (n = 1) subacute toxicity, all gastrointestinal-related. There have been no fatal toxicities and no grade 3 or 4 late toxicity has been observed. The 3-year survival is 21%. Dose escalation of postoperative 5-FU chemoradiation following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma is well tolerated. Further dose-intensification of postoperative adjuvant therapy in these patients appears feasible and is being evaluated in a recently activated national trial.

High-dose intra-arterial cisplatin and concurrent hyperfractionated radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: report of a phase II study

BACKGROUND

This phase II study evaluates the tolerability and efficacy of concurrent hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX-RT) and high-dose intra-arterial (IA) cisplatin in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

METHODS

Between December 1995 and November 1997, 20 patients with locally advanced T4/T3 SCCHN were treated with HFX-RT (76.8-79.2 Gy at 1.2 Gy bid over 6-7 weeks) and high-dose IA cisplatin (150 mg/m(2) given at the start of RT boost treatment [start of week 6]). Seventeen patients (85%) had T4 disease, and 14 (70%) had N2/ N3 disease.

RESULTS

Grade 3-5 acute toxicity was limited to one grade 4 (5%) and 14 grade 3 (70%) mucosal events. No grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was observed. Median weight loss during therapy was 9% (range, 2%-16%). Eighteen patients had complete response (90%) at the primary site; 14 were confirmed pathologically. Among 17 patients with positive neck disease, 16 (94%) achieved complete response in the neck, including 12 of 13 patients with N2/N3 disease who underwent planned neck dissection. Active follow-up ranges from 12 to 32 months (median, 20 months) with 11 patients alive without disease, 5 dead of disease, and 4 dead of intercurrent disease. Eighteen patients (90%) remained disease free at the primary site, and the locoregional control rate is 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose IA cisplatin and concurrent HFX-RT as used in this study is feasible and warrants further investigation. The high complete response rate and low grade 4 toxicity in this highly unfavorable subset of patients appears better than previously reported chemoradiation regimens for more favorable patients.

Four prognostic groups predict long-term survival from prostate cancer following radiotherapy alone on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group clinical trials

PURPOSE

Gleason score (GS), T stage, and pathologic lymph node status have been described as major independent predictors of death due to prostate cancer in men treated with external beam radiotherapy (XRT). In this analysis we combine these three factors to define prognostic subgroups that correlate with disease-specific survival (DSS) death from prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Men entered on one of four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Phase III randomized trials between 1975 and 1992, for clinically localized prostate cancer (CAP) (n = 1557), were selected for this analysis. Patients were included if: 1) they were evaluable, and eligible for the trial; 2) they received no hormonal therapy with their initial treatment; and 3) follow-up was available. For this study a DSS event was declared if: 1) death was certified as due to CAP; 2) death was due to complications of treatment; or 3) death was from unknown causes with active malignancy. The median follow-up for patients treated on early and late RTOG studies exceeded 11 and 6 years respectively. Subgroups were identified based on their pretreatment GS, T-stage, and lymph node such that patients with similar risk of dying from prostate cancer were combined.

RESULTS

By combining patients with similar DSS, four subgroups were identified. Risk Group 1 patients had a GS = 2-6, and T1-2Nx; Group 2: GS = 2-6, T3Nx; or GS = 2-6, N+, or GS = 7, T1-2Nx; Group 3: T3Nx, GS = 7; or N+, GS = 7, or T1-2Nx, GS = 8-10; and Group 4 patients were T3Nx, GS = 8-10, or N+, GS = 8-10. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year DSS was 96%, 86%, and 72%; 94%, 75%, and 61%; 83%, 62%, and 39%; and 64%, 34%, and 27% for Groups 1 through 4, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognition of these four risk groups provides a basis for estimating the long-term DSS for men treated with XRT alone and should facilitate the design of future prospective randomized trials.

Predicting long-term survival, and the need for hormonal therapy: a meta-analysis of RTOG prostate cancer trials

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of short-term and long-term androgen suppression on the disease-specific and overall survival of 2200 men treated with radiotherapy on one of 5 prospective randomized trials when stratified by prognostic risk groups.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1975 and 1992, 2742 men were treated for clinically localized prostate cancer on one of 5 consecutive prospective Phase III randomized trials. Patients were selected for this analysis if they were deemed evaluable and eligible for the trial, and if follow-up information was available. For this analysis patients were stratified into four previously described prognostic risk groups: Group 1 patients had a Gleason score (GS) = 2-6, and T1-2Nx; Group 2: GS = 2-6, T3Nx; or GS = 2-6, N+, or GS = 7, T1-2Nx; Group 3: T3Nx, GS = 7; or N+, GS = 7, or T1-2Nx, GS = 8-10; and Group 4 patients were T3Nx, GS = 8-10, or N+, GS = 8-10. The median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 25 ng/ml for the 434 evaluable patients for whom this information was available. The median follow-up times for patients treated on early studies exceeded 11 years, and for more recent studies 6 years.

RESULTS

Risk group 2 patients with "bulky" or T3 disease appeared to have a disease-specific survival benefit at 8 years with the addition of 4 months of goserelin and flutamide. Group 3 and 4 patients were noted to have an approximately 20% higher survival at 8 years with the addition of long-term hormonal therapy (p < or =0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this meta-analysis of RTOG trials, subsets of patients can be identified who either do not appear to benefit from the use of hormonal therapy, benefit from short-term hormonal therapy, or who benefit only from long-term hormonal therapy. These observations should be confirmed by prospective randomized trials before they can be considered conclusive. In the meantime, however, these observations provide rational guidelines for deciding who should receive hormonal therapy and for how long.

Characterization of a newly established human pancreatic carcinoma cell line, UK Pan-1

BACKGROUND

A highly tumorigenic cell line designated as UK Pan-1 was established in a surgically removed human pancreatic adenocarcinoma and characterized as having many of the genotypic and phenotypic alterations commonly found in pancreatic tumors.

METHODS

The cell line was characterized by its morphology, growth rate in monolayer culture and soft agar, tumorigenicity in nude mice, and chromosomal analysis. Furthermore, the status of p53, Ki-ras mutation and transforming growth factor (TGF)-/receptor expression were determined. The characteristics of UK Pan-1 were compared with those of other commonly used pancreatic carcinoma cell lines.

RESULTS

Quiescent UK Pan-1 cells could be stimulated to proliferate in growth factor free nutrient media, indicating a growth factor independent phenotype. UK Pan- 1 cells grew in soft agar and rapidly formed tumors in nude mice. This cell line possesses a mutation at codon 12 of the c-Ki-ras-2 gene that is commonly found in pancreatic carcinoma. Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed that two alleles of p53 tumor suppressor gene were present in UK Pan-1. However, sequencing analysis revealed a mutation in one allele at exon 8, codon 273 (G to A; Arg to His). Additional growth assays indicated that the cell line was insensitive to negative growth regulation induced by exogenous TGF-beta. Molecular analysis of the TGF-beta signaling pathway showed that UK Pan-1 did not express appreciable levels of the TGF-beta receptor type I, II, or III mRNAs, but did express DPC4 mRNA. Karyotype analysis revealed an 18q21 deletion indicating a possible loss of heterozygosity for DPC4, as well as other chromosomal deletions and rearrangements.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that UK Pan-1 is a highly tumorigenic cell line possessing a molecularly complex pattern of mutations that may be used as a model to further the understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the development of pancreatic carcinoma.

Preoperative chemoradiation in fixed distal rectal cancer: dose time factors for pathological complete response

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemoradiation is being utilized extensively in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, a variety of dose time factors in both delivery of chemotherapy and irradiation remain to be established. This study was undertaken to examine the impact of dose time factors on pathological complete response (pCR) rates following preoperative chemoradiation for fixed rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-three patients with fixed rectal cancers were treated with combined 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy and pelvic radiation. Twenty-one patients received bolus 5-FU during the first 3-5 days of radiation and repeated on days 28-33 of their radiation treatment. Twelve patients were treated with continuous infusion (CI) 5-FU, 225 mg/m(2) for the duration of the pelvic radiation. Fifteen patients received a planned total radiation dose of 45 to 50 Gy and 18 patients received a dose of 55 to 60 Gy. Surgical resection was then carried out 6-8 weeks after completion of treatment.

RESULTS

Diarrhea was the most frequent acute toxicity. Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 6 patients requiring treatment interruption and was not related to the chemotherapy regimen. There was no Grade 4 or 5 toxicity. pCR was observed in 2 of 21 (10%) patients treated with bolus 5-FU as compared to 8 of 12 (67%) for patients treated with CI (p = 0.002). pCR were observed in 8 of 18 (44%) patients receiving radiation dose > or = 5500 cGy as compared to 2 of 15 (13%) patients treated to a dose < or = 5000 cGy (p = 0.05). In the high-dose radiation (> or = 5500 cGy) group, a significant difference in pCR rate was observed in patients treated with CI, 8 of 12 (67%) (p = 0.017) as compared with bolus 5-FU (0 of 6). There was no significant difference in operative morbidity or in wound healing between patients treated with bolus 5-FU or CI or within the groups treated with low or high doses of radiation. Three patients have developed local recurrence at 14 and 24 months, two in the low-dose group treated with bolus 5-FU and one patient in the CVI group. The overall 5-year survival for the whole group is 71%.

CONCLUSION

Dose intensity of 5-FU and dose of radiation correlate significantly with the likelihood of achieving a pCR. Continuous infusion 5-FU (CI) and a preoperative radiation dose of 5500 cGy or higher can achieve pCR rates of approximately 50%, even in fixed cancers of the rectum.

Outcomes of patients receiving radiation for carcinoma of the rectum. Results of the 1988-1989 patterns of care study

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials of surgical adjuvant treatment for patients with rectal carcinoma (RC) indicate that postoperative radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy (CRT) is superior to postoperative radiation alone (RT) or surgery alone. Whether preoperative treatment is superior to postoperative treatment is controversial. This Patterns of Care Study (PCS) surveyed patients with RC treated with radiation during the years 1988-1989 to determine the national practice standards and outcomes and to compare these results with those of clinical trials.

METHODS

A national survey of 73 institutions was conducted using 2-stage cluster sampling, and specific information on 406 patients with RC who received radiation at 69 facilities was collected. Follow-up information on 215 patients was subsequently collected by mail survey. There were no significant differences between the known prognostic indicators or treatment-related variables for patients for whom follow-up was available compared with the variables for patients for whom follow-up was not available. Follow-up ranged from 0 to 8.44 years with a median of 4 years. One hundred fifty-four patients (71%) received postoperative treatment, either RT (37%) or CRT (34%); and 40 (18%) received preoperative treatment, either RT (15%) or CRT (3%). Ninety-six patients (45%) received chemotherapy, and for 86% of those patients chemotherapy was administered concurrently with radiation.

RESULTS

Survival was stage-dependent (85% Stage I, 69% Stage II, and 54% Stage III at 5 years, P = 0.04). Survival was also substage-dependent, and patients with C(1) cancer had significantly higher 5-year survival than those with C(2)/C(3) cancer (89% vs. 48%, P = 0.008). Local failure was similar for Stage II and Stage III patients (10% vs. 11% at 5 years, respectively). In multivariate analyses, only stage and use of chemotherapy were significant to survival (Stage III vs. Stage I and II, relative risk [RR] = 2.52, and chemotherapy vs. no chemotherapy, RR = 0.46). A significantly higher 5-year survival rate was seen with postoperative CRT than with postoperative RT (69% vs. 50%, P = 0. 011). Preoperative radiation resulted in a significantly higher 5-year survival rate than postoperative radiation (85% vs. 50%, P = 0.0006), but not compared with postoperative CRT. Survival and local failure did not differ according to radiation therapy interruption or the interval between surgery and radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Stage is an important prognostic indicator for survival, and among patients with Stage III malignancies survival in the substage C(1) is significantly higher than in the substages C(2) and C(3). As has been demonstrated in randomized trials, adjuvant postoperative CRT is superior to postoperative RT for patients with RC in this national study. These nationwide results of adjuvant treatment are comparable to those reported in randomized trials. The use of CRT was the only treatment-related factor that resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of death.

Differential expression of transforming growth factor beta receptors in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Many cancer cells show resistance to transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta)-mediated growth inhibition. This resistance to TGF-beta is associated with an increased tumorigenic phenotype.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we determined whether a loss in expression of TGF-beta receptors or DPC4, an important down stream target of TGF-beta signaling, might account for this lack of TGF-beta sensitivity in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To accomplish this, six established pancreatic cancer cell lines, twenty-six surgically resected tumor specimens of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and ten non-tumor pancreas tissues were analyzed for the mRNA expression of the three TGF-beta receptors (RI, RII, and RIII) and DPC4.

RESULTS

We report here that five of six pancreatic cancer cell lines were not sensitive to TGF-beta. All the ten non-tumor specimens of pancreas showed expression of RI, and DPC4; while nine of ten showed expression of RIII and eight of ten showed expression of RII. Five of six pancreatic cancer cell lines and 23 of 26 tumor specimens showed expression of RI. Two cell lines and about half (46%) of the tumor specimens did not express RII. Only two cell lines showed appreciable levels of RIII expression; while ten of 26 (38%) tumor specimens did not show expression of RIII. DPC4 expression was observed in three of the six (50%) cell lines and 19 of 24 (79%) tumor specimens.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that apart from the functional loss of DPC4 due to mutations or homozygous deletion, a lack of the TGF-beta receptors, particularly RII and RIII, may contribute to a loss of TGF-beta signaling in a population of pancreatic cancers.

Outcomes of patients receiving radiation for carcinoma of the rectum. Results of the 1988-1989 patterns of care study

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials of surgical adjuvant treatment for patients with rectal carcinoma (RC) indicate that postoperative radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy (CRT) is superior to postoperative radiation alone (RT) or surgery alone. Whether preoperative treatment is superior to postoperative treatment is controversial. This Patterns of Care Study (PCS) surveyed patients with RC treated with radiation during the years 1988-1989 to determine the national practice standards and outcomes and to compare these results with those of clinical trials.

METHODS

A national survey of 73 institutions was conducted using 2-stage cluster sampling, and specific information on 406 patients with RC who received radiation at 69 facilities was collected. Follow-up information on 215 patients was subsequently collected by mail survey. There were no significant differences between the known prognostic indicators or treatment-related variables for patients for whom follow-up was available compared with the variables for patients for whom follow-up was not available. Follow-up ranged from 0 to 8.44 years with a median of 4 years. One hundred fifty-four patients (71%) received postoperative treatment, either RT (37%) or CRT (34%); and 40 (18%) received preoperative treatment, either RT (15%) or CRT (3%). Ninety-six patients (45%) received chemotherapy, and for 86% of those patients chemotherapy was administered concurrently with radiation.

RESULTS

Survival was stage-dependent (85% Stage I, 69% Stage II, and 54% Stage III at 5 years, P = 0.04). Survival was also substage-dependent, and patients with C(1) cancer had significantly higher 5-year survival than those with C(2)/C(3) cancer (89% vs. 48%, P = 0.008). Local failure was similar for Stage II and Stage III patients (10% vs. 11% at 5 years, respectively). In multivariate analyses, only stage and use of chemotherapy were significant to survival (Stage III vs. Stage I and II, relative risk [RR] = 2.52, and chemotherapy vs. no chemotherapy, RR = 0.46). A significantly higher 5-year survival rate was seen with postoperative CRT than with postoperative RT (69% vs. 50%, P = 0. 011). Preoperative radiation resulted in a significantly higher 5-year survival rate than postoperative radiation (85% vs. 50%, P = 0.0006), but not compared with postoperative CRT. Survival and local failure did not differ according to radiation therapy interruption or the interval between surgery and radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Stage is an important prognostic indicator for survival, and among patients with Stage III malignancies survival in the substage C(1) is significantly higher than in the substages C(2) and C(3). As has been demonstrated in randomized trials, adjuvant postoperative CRT is superior to postoperative RT for patients with RC in this national study. These nationwide results of adjuvant treatment are comparable to those reported in randomized trials. The use of CRT was the only treatment-related factor that resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of death.

High-dose spatially-fractionated radiation (GRID): a new paradigm in the management of advanced cancers

PURPOSE

With the advent of megavoltage radiation, the concept of spatially-fractionated (SFR) radiation has been abandoned for the last several decades; yet, historically, it has been proven to be safe and effective in delivering large cumulative doses (> 100 Gy) of radiation in the treatment of cancer. SFR radiation has been adapted to megavoltage beams using a specially constructed grid. This study evaluates the toxicity and effectiveness of this approach in treatment of advanced and bulky cancers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From January 1995 through March 1998, 71 patients with advanced bulky tumors (tumor sizes > 8 cm) were treated with SFR high-dose external beam megavoltage radiation using a GRID technique. Sixteen patients received GRID treatments to multiple sites and a total of 87 sites were irradiated. A 50:50 GRID (open to closed area) was utilized, and a single dose of 1,000-2,000 cGy (median 1,500 cGy) to Dmax was delivered utilizing 6 MV photons. Sixty-three patients received high-dose GRID therapy for palliation (pain, mass, bleeding, or dyspnea). In 8 patients, GRID therapy was given as part of a definitive treatment combined with conventionally-fractionated external beam irradiation (dose range 5,000-7,000 cGy) followed by subsequent surgery. Forty-seven patients were treated with GRID radiation followed by additional fractionated external beam irradiation, and 14 patients were treated with GRID alone. Thirty-one treatments were delivered to the abdomen and pelvis, 30 to the head and neck region, 15 to the thorax, and 11 to the extremities.

RESULTS

For palliative treatments, a 78% response rate was observed for pain, including a complete response (CR) of 19.5%, and a partial response (PR) of 58.5% in these large bulky tumors. A 72.5% response rate was observed for mass effect (CR 14.6%, PR 52.9%). The response rate observed for bleeding was 100% (50% CR, 50% PR) and for dyspnea, a 60% PR rate only. A relatively higher response rate (CR 23.3%, PR 60%) was observed in patients who received GRID treatment in the head and neck area. No grade 3 late skin, subcutaneous, mucosal, GI, or CNS complications were observed in any patient in spite of these high doses. In the 8 patients who received GRID treatment for definitive treatment, a clinical CR was observed in 5 patients (62.5%) and a pathological complete response was confirmed in the operative specimen in 4 patients (50%).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of using a large fraction of SFR radiation was confirmed by this study and substantiates our earlier results. In selected patients with bulky tumors (> 8 cm), SFR radiation can be combined with fractionated external beam irradiation to yield improved local control of disease, both for palliation and selective definitive treatment, especially where conventional treatment alone has a limited chance of success.

Postoperative radiation therapy for primary vs. recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of a comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

There is little literature comparatively evaluating the results of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck treated for primary versus recurrent disease.

METHODS

Between 1981 and 1993, 174 patients with SCC of the head and neck, 143 with primary and 31 with recurrent disease, were treated with standard postoperative RT.

RESULTS

Patients treated for primary disease had 5-year local-regional control (LRC) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates of 69% and 54%, respectively, as compared with 46% and 32%, respectively, for patients treated for recurrent disease (P = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). On multivariate analysis, only tumor type (primary vs recurrent) significantly influenced LRC (P = 0.003) and only primary tumor site (oral cavity vs nonoral cavity) significantly influenced DSS (P = 0.04). Among the patients treated for recurrent disease, site of recurrence (undissected vs dissected tissue) significantly influenced both LRC and DSS (P = 0.008 and 0. 001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with recurrent SCC of the head and neck do poorly as compared with those with primary disease when treated with standard postoperative RT, particularly when the recurrence is within previously dissected tissue. This patient group should be targeted for alternative treatment strategies.