SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies after first vaccination dose in breast cancer patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors

Undoubtedly, the development of COVID-19 vaccines displays a critical step towards ending this devastating pandemic, considering their protective benefits in the general population. Yet, data regarding their efficacy and safety in cancer patients are limited. Herein we provide the initial analysis of immune responses after the first dose of vaccination in 21 breast cancer patients receiving cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. The levels of neutralizing antibodies post vaccination were similar to the matched healthy controls, whereas no safety issues have been raised. Further exploration is needed to reduce the uncertainty of SARS-CoV-2 immunity among cancer patients under treatment.

•

Data on the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in cancer patients are limited.

•

21 breast cancer patients under CDK4/6 inhibition enrolled to our prospective study.

•

Nearly 30% of them developed favorable viral inhibition after the first dose.

•

Immune responses did not differ between patient cohort and healthy controls.

Ibrutinib plus rituximab for the treatment of adult patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia: a safety evaluation

Introduction: Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM), an orphan disease, is a rare low-grade B-cell lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma with unique clinical features and monoclonal IgM production. Rituximab remains to this date the backbone of most commonly used treatment combinations. The FDA/EMA approval of Ibrutinib, the first-in-class BTK inhibitor, either as monotherapy or in combination with rituximab, changed the treatment landscape of the disease.Areas covered: Clinical trial data that demonstrate mode of action, efficacy, and the safety profile of each agent will be covered. A safety analysis of the combination treatment will also be performed to point out its high efficacy and overall favorable toxicity profile. The disadvantages and treatment gaps that still exist in the treatment of WM which relate to the need for long-term ibrutinib administration and the lack of deep remissions and subsequent disease relapse, will also be reviewed.Expert opinion: The ibrutinib-rituximab combination is both effective and safe, in the newly-diagnosed and relapsed-refractory disease setting. The optimal therapeutic approach for WM patients remains however to be established. The question of which combinatory (or synergistic) regimen can allow for a fixed-treatment duration, deep and durable responses with a safe toxicity profile is being addressed in ongoing clinical trials.

Low neutralizing antibody responses in WM, CLL and NHL patients after the first dose of the BNT162b2 and AZD1222 vaccine

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is considered as the most important preventive strategy against COVID-19, but its efficacy in patients with hematological malignancies is largely unknown. We investigated the development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). After the first dose of the vaccine, on D22, WM/CLL/NHL patients had lower NAb titers compared to controls: the median NAb inhibition titer was 17% (range 0–91%, IQR 8–27%) for WM/CLL/NHL patients versus 32% (range 2–98%, IQR 19–48%) for controls (P < 0.001). Only 8 (14%) patients versus 114 (54%) controls developed NAb titers ≥ 30% on D22 (p < 0.001). Our data indicate that the first dose of both BNT162b2 and AZD1222 leads to lower production of NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with WM/CLL/NHL compared to controls of similar age and gender and without malignant disease. Even though the response rates were not optimal, vaccination is still considered essential and if possible should be performed before treatment initiation. These patients with suboptimal responses should be considered to be prioritized for booster doses.

COVID-19 and ischemic stroke

Since the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic, a substantial proportion of COVID‐19 patients had documented thrombotic complications and ischemic stroke. Several mechanisms related to immune‐mediated thrombosis, the renin angiotensin system and the effect of SARS‐CoV‐2 in cardiac and brain tissue may contribute to the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke in patients with COVID‐19. Simultaneously, significant strains on global healthcare delivery, including ischemic stroke management, have made treatment of stroke in the setting of COVID‐19 particularly challenging. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on epidemiology, clinical manifestation, and pathophysiology of ischemic stroke in patients with COVID‐19 to bridge the gap from bench to bedside and clinical practice during the most challenging global health crisis of the last decades.

Effect of age and frailty on the efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma

Elderly and frail patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are more vulnerable to the toxicity of combination therapies, often resulting in treatment modifications and suboptimal outcomes. The phase 3 BOSTON study showed that once-weekly selinexor and bortezomib with low-dose dexamethasone (XVd) improved PFS and ORR compared with standard twice-weekly bortezomib and moderate-dose dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with previously treated MM. This is a retrospective subgroup analysis of the multicenter, prospective, randomized BOSTON trial. Post hoc analyses were performed to compare XVd versus Vd safety and efficacy according to age and frailty status (<65 and ≥65 years, nonfrail and frail). Patients ≥65 years with XVd had higher ORR (OR 1.77, p = .024), ≥VGPR (OR, 1.68, p = .027), PFS (HR 0.55, p = .002), and improved OS (HR 0.63, p = .030), compared with Vd. In frail patients, XVd was associated with a trend towards better PFS (HR 0.69, p = .08) and OS (HR 0.62, p = .062). Significant improvements were also observed in patients <65 (ORR and TTNT) and nonfrail patients (PFS, ORR, ≥VGPR, and TTNT). Patients treated with XVd had a lower incidence of grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy in ≥65 year-old (22% vs. 37%; p = .0060) and frail patients (15% vs. 44%; p = .0002). Grade ≥3 TEAEs were not observed more often in older compared to younger patients, nor in frail compared to nonfrail patients. XVd is safe and effective in patients <65 and ≥65 and in nonfrail and frail patients with previously treated MM.

Survival among older patients with previously treated multiple myeloma treated with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (XVd) in the BOSTON study

8019

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) typically affects older populations, which are more vulnerable to toxicity with anti-MM treatments. These patients (pts) have significant morbidity and mortality, resulting in a need for dose modifications or alternative suboptimal treatment options. Significant improvements were observed in the BOSTON study with XVd vs Vd in median progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and rates of peripheral neuropathy (PN); median overall survival (OS) trended in favor of XVd. Methods: The phase 3 randomized BOSTON trial (NCT03110562) is a controlled, open-label study of once weekly XVd vs. twice weekly standard Vd in pts with MM and 1-3 prior treatment regimens. We performed post-hoc analyses to compare survival benefits in pts ≥65 vs < 65 years of age. Results: The BOSTON study enrolled a total of 402 pts between June 2017 and February 2019 that were randomized into XVd or Vd arms. The numbers of pts treated with XVd or Vd who were ≥65 were 109/132 and 86/75 who were < 65, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar by age although pts ≥65 years were less likely to have received ASCT than those < 65 years (48.4% vs. 25.3%). Median PFS was prolonged with XVd compared with Vd, across both age groups: ≥65 (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.37-0.83] P = 0.002) and < 65, (HR, 0. 74 [95% CI, 0.49-1.11], P = 0.07). Vd was associated with a lower ORR (64.4%) than treatment with XVd (76.1%) (OR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.00-3.11], P = 0.024) in pts ≥65, while the ORR in those < 65 was 76.7% with XVd and 58.7% (OR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.18-4.59], P = 0.007) with Vd. As of Jan 2021, the median OS for the overall population was not reached for both arms (HR = 0.86; p = 0.193), with 61 and 75 deaths in the XVd and Vd arms, respectively. Median OS was not reached in pts ≥65 with XVd and was 28.6 months with Vd (HR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.94; p = 0.012), while there was no difference in the OS for pts < 65 (HR = 1.52; 95% CI, 0.86-2.68; p = 0.926). Pts ≥65 had a lower incidence of death with XVd as compared to Vd (29 vs 56) and there were 32 deaths with XVd and 19 with Vd in pts < 65. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were not observed more often in older compared to younger pts. Amongst pts ≥65, PN of any grade was lower with XVd (32.1%) compared to Vd (46.5%); (OR 0.57 [95% CI 0.34-0.97], p = 0.017), including a lower incidence of grade ≥3 PN (XVd 4.6% vs. Vd 11.6%). Pts < 65 followed a similar trend of PN AEs of any grade: XVd, 32.6%; Vd, 48.0% (OR 0.42 [95% CI 0.21-0.82], p = 0.006). Conclusions: In an older patient population with a poor prognosis, XVd was associated with a significant survival benefit, improved PFS and OR with reduced PN, and requires relatively short and infrequent clinic visits. XVd may be a simple, effective regimen for pts ≥65 years of age. Clinical trial information: NCT03110562.

Effects of refractory status to lenalidomide on safety and efficacy of selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (XVd) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma

8024

Background: Lenalidomide (LEN) is typically a frontline therapy for newly diagnosed MM. Patients (pts) with MM refractory to LEN are less likely to repond to other IMiDs and represent a signification area of unmet medical need. In the BOSTON study in the ITT population, XVd was associated with significant improvements in median progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and rates of peripheral neuropathy, with trends in overall survival (OS) favoring XVd. Methods: The BOSTON trial (NCT03110562) is a Phase 3 randomized, controlled, open-label study of once weekly XVd vs twice weekly Vd in pts with MM and 1-3 prior therapies. We performed post-hoc analyses on two different subgroups to compare outcomes based on refractory status to LEN and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) therapy. These post hoc analyses evaluated if PFS, overall response rate (ORR), time to next treatment (TTNT) and safety was influenced by prior treatment with LEN when comparing XVd with Vd. Results: Amongst the 402 pts in BOSTON, 160 had MM refractory to any IMiD (XVd = 74, Vd = 86). Of those, 106 were documented to be refractory to LEN (XVd = 53, Vd = 53) and 296 were not refractory to LEN (XVd = 142, Vd = 154). Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between subgroups. In these subgroups based on refractory status to IMiD or LEN, median PFS was significantly longer in the XVd arm as compared to Vd (IMiD refractory, 13.9 vs. 8.4 months (mo), p = 0.005; LEN refractory, 10.2 vs. 7.1 mo, p = 0.012; not LEN refractory, 15.4 vs 9.6 mo, p = 0.014). Significant increases in TTNT were observed with XVd treatment in pts that were IMiD refractory (14.8 vs. 10.2 mo, p = 0.003), LEN refractory (13.0 vs. 7.6 mo, p = 0.015), and not refractory to LEN (19.1 vs 12.9 mo, p = 0.005). ORR was improved with XVd compared to Vd regardless of refractory status (IMiD refractory, 68.9% vs 55.8%, p = 0.045; LEN refractory, 67.9% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.016; and not refractory to LEN, 79.6% vs 67.5%, p = 0.010). The most common treatment-emergent AEs for the XVd/Vd arms for all subgroups were thrombocytopenia (66.2/30.6%; 71.7/40.4%; 55.6/22.4%), nausea (48.6/11.8%; 50.9/11.5%; 50.0/9.2%), and fatigue (40.5/20.0%; 45.3/21.2%; 40.8/17.1%) for IMiD, LEN, and not LEN refractory, respectively. Incidence of PN AEs of any grade were reduced compared to pts treated with Vd (IMiD refractory, 27% vs. 42.4%; LEN refractory, 30.2% vs 36.5%; not refractory, LEN 33.1% vs 50.7%). Conclusions: In pts with previously treated MM, PFS, ORR, and TTNT were significantly improved regardless of documented refractory status to any IMiD or to LEN-specifically. These analyses support the use of the XVd combination for pts with disease refractory to LEN and likely to any IMiD. Clinical trial information: NCT03110562.

Epidemiology and organ specific sequelae of post-acute COVID19: A narrative review

Objectives

“Long COVID”, a term coined by COVID-19 survivors, describes persistent or new symptoms in a subset of patients who have recovered from acute illness. Globally, the population of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 continues to expand rapidly, necessitating the need for a more thorough understanding of the array of potential sequelae of COVID-19.

The multisystemic aspects of acute COVID-19 have been the subject of intense investigation, but the long–term complications remain poorly understood. Emerging data from lay press, social media, commentaries, and emerging scientific reports suggest that some COVID-19 survivors experience organ impairment and/or debilitating chronic symptoms, at times protean in nature, which impact their quality of life.

Methods/Results

In this review, by addressing separately each body system, we describe the pleiotropic manifestations reported post COVID-19, their putative pathophysiology and risk factors, and attempt to offer guidance regarding work-up, follow-up and management strategies. Long term sequelae involve all systems with a negative impact on mental health, well-being and quality of life, while a subset of patients, report debilitating chronic fatigue, with or without other fluctuating or persistent symptoms, such as pain or cognitive dysfunction. Although the pathogenesis is unclear, residual damage from acute infection, persistent immune activation, mental factors, or unmasking of underlying co-morbidities are considered as drivers. Comparing long COVID with other post viral chronic syndromes may help to contextualize the complex somatic and emotional sequalae of acute COVID-19. The pace of recovery of different aspects of the syndrome remains unclear as the pandemic began only a year ago.

Conclusions

Early recognition of long-term effects and thorough follow-up through dedicated multidisciplinary outpatient clinics with a carefully integrated research agenda are essential for treating COVID-19 survivors holistically.

Emerging treatment strategies for COVID-19 infection

The new type of coronavirus (COVID-19), SARS-CoV-2 originated from Wuhan, China and has led to a worldwide pandemic. COVID-19 is a novel emerging infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 characterized as atypical pneumonia. As of July 1, 2020, more than 10 million people worldwide had been infected with SARS-CoV-2. The typical manifestations of COVID-19 include fever, sore throat, fatigue, cough, and dyspnoea combined with recent exposure. Most of the patients with COVID-19 have mild or moderate disease, however up to 5-10% present with severe and even life-threatening disease course. The mortality rates are approximately 2%. Therefore, there is an urgent need for effective and specific antiviral treatment. Currently, supportive care measures such as ventilation oxygenation and fluid management remain the standard of care. Several clinical trials are currently trying to identify the most potent drug or combination against the disease, and it is strongly recommended to enroll patients into ongoing trials. Antivirals can be proven as safe and effective only in the context of randomized clinical trials. Currently several agents such as chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir, monoclonal antibodies, antisense RNA, corticosteroids, convalescent plasma and vaccines are being evaluated. The large numbers of therapeutic interventions aim to define the most efficacious regimen. The aim of this article is to describe the treatment strategies that have been used for COVID-19 patients and review all the available literature.

Effect of prior treatments on selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma

Therapeutic regimens for previously treated multiple myeloma (MM) may not provide prolonged disease control and are often complicated by significant adverse events, including peripheral neuropathy. In patients with previously treated MM in the Phase 3 BOSTON study, once weekly selinexor, once weekly bortezomib, and 40 mg dexamethasone (XVd) demonstrated a significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS), higher response rates, deeper responses, a trend to improved survival, and reduced incidence and severity of bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy when compared with standard twice weekly bortezomib and 80 mg dexamethasone (Vd). The pre-specified analyses described here evaluated the influence of the number of prior lines of therapy, prior treatment with lenalidomide, prior proteasome inhibitor (PI) therapy, prior immunomodulatory drug therapy, and prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) on the efficacy and safety of XVd compared with Vd. In this 1:1 randomized study, enrolled patients were assigned to receive once weekly oral selinexor (100 mg) with once weekly subcutaneous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) and 40 mg per week dexamethasone (XVd) versus standard twice weekly bortezomib and 80 mg per week dexamethasone (Vd). XVd significantly improved PFS, overall response rate, time-to-next-treatment, and showed reduced all grade and grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy compared with Vd regardless of prior treatments, but the benefits of XVd over Vd were more pronounced in patients treated earlier in their disease course who had either received only one prior therapy, had never been treated with a PI, or had prior ASCT. Treatment with XVd improved outcomes as compared to Vd regardless of prior therapies as well as manageable and generally reversible adverse events. XVd was associated with clinical benefit and reduced peripheral neuropathy compared to standard Vd in previously treated MM. These results suggest that the once weekly XVd regimen may be optimally administered to patients earlier in their course of disease, as their first bortezomib-containing regimen, and in those relapsing after ASCT.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03110562). Registered 12 April 2017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03110562 .

The systemic treatment of uterine leiomyosarcomas: A systematic review. No news is good news?

BACKGROUND

Uterine leiomyosarcomas are rare malignant mesenchymal tumors. The systemic treatment of these tumors includes chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, there are still a lot of unanswered questions regarding the ideal therapeutic approach.

METHODS

We have conducted a systematic review of the treatment strategies of uterine leiomyosarcomas for the last ten years.

RESULTS

Adjuvant chemotherapy is still a matter of dilemma. Doxorubicin based chemotherapy or the combination of Gemcitabine-Docetaxel are the regimens of choice for the first line setting. Beyond the first line, there are several options;, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and recently efforts of introducing immunotherapy to the therapeutic armamentarium of clinicians treating uterine leiomyosarcomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the efforts of the clinicians dealing with uterine leiomyosarcomas, the optimal therapeutic algorithm is yet to be described.

Carfilzomib Improves Bone Metabolism in Patients with Advanced Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results of the CarMMa Study

Simple Summary

Carfilzomib with dexamethasone is an important therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. We sought to evaluate the effect of this regimen on the bone-related outcomes, which are associated with both quality of life and survival. Among 25 patients, less than one third experienced a new skeletal-related event during treatment, even in the absence of any bone-targeted agent. Interestingly, there was a significant decrease in serum biomarkers of bone resorption, which was at least partially due to the sRANKL/OPG ratio reduction. Furthermore, Kd produced an increase in markers of bone formation. Importantly, these changes were independent of myeloma response to treatment. Therefore, the combination of carfilzomib and dexamethasone improves bone metabolism and bone health in patients with advanced multiple myeloma.

Abstract

Carfilzomib with dexamethasone (Kd) is a well-established regimen for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). There is limited information for the effects of Kd on myeloma-related bone disease. This non-interventional study aimed to assess skeletal-related events (SREs) and bone metabolism in patients with RRMM receiving Kd, in the absence of any bone-targeted agent. Twenty-five patients were enrolled with a median of three prior lines of therapy; 72% of them had evidence of osteolytic bone disease at study entry. During Kd treatment, the rate of new SREs was 28%. Kd produced a clinically relevant (≥30%) decrease in C-telopeptide of collagen type-1 (p = 0.048) and of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (p = 0.002) at 2 months. This reduction was at least partially due to the reduction in the osteoclast regulator RANKL/osteoprotegerin ratio, at 2 months (p = 0.026). Regarding bone formation, there was a clinically relevant increase in osteocalcin at 6 months (p = 0.03) and in procollagen type I N-propeptide at 8 months post-Kd initiation. Importantly, these bone metabolism changes were independent of myeloma response to treatment. In conclusion, Kd resulted in a low rate of SREs among RRMM patients, along with an early, sustained and clinically relevant decrease in bone resorption, which was accompanied by an increase in bone formation, independently of myeloma response and in the absence of any bone-targeted agent use.

Recovery of Innate Immune Cells and Persisting Alterations in Adaptive Immunity in the Peripheral Blood of Convalescent Plasma Donors at Eight Months Post SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Persisting alterations and unique immune signatures have been previously detected in the peripheral blood of convalescent plasma (CP) donors at approximately two months after initial SARS-CoV-2 infection. This article presents the results on the sequential analysis of 47 CP donors at a median time of eight months (range 7.5-8.5 months) post infection, as assessed by flow cytometry. Interestingly, our results show a significant variation of the relevant immune subset composition among CP donors. Regarding innate immunity, both non-classical monocytes, and CD11b- granulocytes had fully recovered at eight months post COVID-19 infection. Intermediate monocytes and natural killer (NK) cells had already been restored at the two-month evaluation and remained stable. Regarding adaptive immunity, the COVID-19-related skewed Th1 and Th2 cell polarization remained at the same levels as in two months. However, low levels of total B cells were detected even after eight months from infection. A persisting reduction of CD8+ Tregs and changes in the NKT cell compartment were also remarkable. CP donors present with a unique immune landscape at eight months post COVID-19 infection, which is characterized by the notable restoration of the components of innate immunity along with a persisting imprint of SARS-CoV-2 in cells of the adaptive immunity.

Next generation flow cytometry for MRD detection in patients with AL amyloidosis

The treatment of AL amyloidosis aims to eradicate the plasma cell clone and eliminate toxic free light chain production. Only in a minority of patients the plasma cell clone is completely eradicated; residual light chain production may still exist while clonal relapse may occur. We used sensitive next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) in AL amyloidosis patients at complete haematologic response. MRD evaluation was feasible in 51 of 52 (98%) tested patients and at a median sensitivity of 2.3 × 10^-6 MRD was undetectable in 23 (45%). An organ response occurred in 86% of MRDneg vs 77% in MRDpos; renal response in 15/17(88%) of MRDneg vs in 14/16(87.5%) of MRDpos and cardiac response in 10/10(100%) of MRDneg vs 11/15(73%) of MRDpos patients. After a median follow-up of 24 months post MRD testing, no MRDneg patient had a haematologic relapse vs 6/28(21%) MRDpos (p = .029). Pooling haematologic and organ progressions, 9 (32%) MRDpos patients had disease progression vs only 1 (4%) MRDneg patient (p = .026). In conclusion, MRD detection using NGF has profound clinical implications, so that AL patients with undetectable MRD have a very high probability of organ response and a very low probability of haematologic relapse.

Timing and impact of a deep response in the outcome of patients with systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis

A rapid and deep haematologic response is fundamental in order to improve outcomes of patients with AL amyloidosis. We evaluated the impact of timing and depth of haematologic response at early time points (at 1 and 3 months from the start of therapy) in 227 consecutive previously untreated AL patients, who received bortezomib-based primary therapy. After 1 month of therapy, 30.5% had ≥VGPR, 28% PR and 36% no response (NR), with 11% having iFLC <20 mg/L and 15% dFLC <10 mg/L. Deep haematologic response at 1 month (either ≥VGPR or iFLC <20 mg/L or dFLC <10 mg/L), was associated with a high organ response rate. The survival of patients with ≥VGPR was significantly better than those with PR and NR at 1-month landmark (p < .001) but this benefit was mainly driven by those with iFLC <20 mg/L. The depth of haematologic response at 1 month was significant across all Mayo stages. At 3 months, 46% of the patients had not significantly improved the depth of their response but even patients that improved their response from an iFLC ≥20 mg/L at 1 month to iFLC <20 mg/L at 3 months still had inferior outcome to those with an early deep response. Thus, in patients with AL amyloidosis, a very rapid and deep response is crucial, especially for those at high risk, targeting very low FLC levels within the first month of therapy.

Overweight/Obesity and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance

BACKGROUND

Obesity and high body mass index (BMI) are associated with increased incidence of multiple myeloma (MM). MM usually evolves from a precursor asymptomatic disease, namely monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). MGUS progresses to MM at a 1% annual rate; however, risk factors predisposing to MGUS are not completely understood. We conducted a systematic review to assess the relationship between obesity and high BMI with MGUS prevalence and progression to MM. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review evaluating the role of obesity in MGUS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched the Medline database and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies investigating BMI and obesity association with MGUS incidence and progression. The algorithm consisted of a predefined combination of the words "obesity," "obese," "body mass index," "overweight," "diet," "nutrition," "food," "dietary," "adiponectin," "monoclonal gammopathy," and "MGUS".

RESULTS

Overall, 12 articles were retrieved, including 11 eligible articles and 1 clinical trial. More than 57,068 patients were evaluated in this systematic review. Discrepancies between the identified studies were noted. Multiple studies support the notion that obesity or high BMI are positively linked to MGUS prevalence and transition to MM. In contrast, other studies revealed no such association. Visceral adipose tissue metabolic activity and decreased adiponectin concentrations were identified as biomarkers of MGUS progression to MM.

CONCLUSION

Obesity and increased BMI seem to be implicated both in MGUS development and progression to MM. Further studies should be designed to confirm this hypothesis.

Carfilzomib-induced endothelial dysfunction, recovery of proteasome activity, and prediction of cardiovascular complications: a prospective study

Carfilzomib (CFZ) improves survival in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma but is associated with cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs). We prospectively investigated the effect of CFZ on endothelial function and associations with CVAEs. Forty-eight patients treated with Kd (CFZ 20/56 mg/m² and dexamethasone) underwent serial endothelial function evaluation, using brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and 26S proteasome activity (PrA) measurement in PBMCs; patients were followed until disease progression or cycle 6 for a median of 10 months. FMD and PrA decreased acutely after the first dose (p < 0.01) and FMD decreased at cycles 3 and 6 compared to baseline (p ≤ 0.05). FMD changes were associated with CFZ-induced PrA changes (p < 0.05) and lower PrA recovery during first cycle was associated with more prominent FMD decrease (p = 0.034 for group interaction). During treatment, 25 patients developed Grade ≥3 CVAEs. Low baseline FMD (HR 2.57 lowest vs. higher tertiles, 95% CI 1.081-6.1) was an independent predictor of CVAEs. During treatment, an acute FMD decrease >40% at the end of first cycle was also independently associated with CVAEs (HR = 3.91, 95% CI 1.29-11.83). Kd treatment impairs endothelial function which is associated with PrA inhibition and recovery. Both pre- and posttreatment FMD predicted CFZ-related CVAEs supporting its role as a possible cardiovascular toxicity biomarker.

Continuing Cancer Therapy through the Pandemic While Protecting Our Patients: Results of the Implementation of Preventive Strategies in a Referral Oncology Unit

Cancer patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 have worse outcomes, including higher morbidity and mortality than the general population. Protecting this vulnerable group of patients from COVID-19 is of the utmost importance for the continuous operation of an oncology unit. Preventive strategies have been proposed by various societies, and centers around the world have implemented these or modified measures; however, the efficacy of these measures has not been evaluated. In our center, a referral oncology/hematology unit in Athens, Greece, we implemented strict protective measures from the outset of the pandemic in the country and we have prospectively recorded the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19. Among 11,618 patient visits performed in our unit, 26 patients (case-to-visit ratio of 0.22%) were found positive for SARS-CoV-2, including 4 (1%) among 392 patients that were screened before starting primary systemic treatment. Among patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 22 were symptomatic at the time of diagnosis; subsequently, 12 required hospitalization and 5 died due to COVID-19. Detailed contact tracing indicated that there was no in-unit transmission of the infection. Thus, strict implementation of multilevel protective strategies along with a modestly intense screening program allowed us to continue cancer care in our unit through the pandemic.

Current and novel BTK inhibitors in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia

The current therapeutic approach in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM) is being driven by insights in disease biology and genomic landscape. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) plays a key role in signaling pathways for the survival of WM clone. BTK inhibition has changed the treatment landscape of the disease. Ibrutinib has resulted in deep and durable responses both as an upfront and salvage treatment with a manageable toxicity profile. However, the need for fewer off-target effects and deeper responses has resulted in the clinical development of second-generation BTK inhibitors. Zanubrutinib has resulted in clinically meaningful antitumor activity, including deep and durable responses, with a low discontinuation rate due to treatment-related toxicities. Cardiovascular adverse events seem to be milder compared with ibrutinib. Interestingly, the efficacy of zanubrutinib in WM is significant both for MYD88^L265P and MYD88^WT patients. Although the randomized, phase III ASPEN clinical trial did not meet its primary endpoint in terms of showing a superiority of zanubrutinib in deep responses compared with ibrutinib, secondary efficacy and safety endpoints underscore the potential clinical role of zanubrutinib in the treatment algorithm of WM independent of the MYD88 mutational status. Combination regimens and non-covalent BTK inhibitors are emerging as promising treatment strategies. Long-term data will determine whether next-generation BTK inhibitors are more potent and safer compared with ibrutinib, and whether they are able to overcome resistance to ibrutinib, either alone or in combination with inhibitors of other interrelated molecular pathways.

Real-World Treatment of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma

The continuous advances in the treatment landscape of multiple myeloma has led to the approval of several novel agents and their combinations that significantly improved patient outcomes. Despite their undoubtful effectiveness in the context of clinical trials, their impact on real-world (RW) clinical practice remains debatable. RW data on the role of novel agents and their combinations among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma have confirmed the efficacy of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies. However, the magnitude of the benefit and the safety profile may differ among RW studies and between RW and pivotal clinical trials. Several variables may pertain to these observations and include patient selection, ethnicity, age, comorbidities, disease stage at diagnosis and at relapse, number of prior lines of therapy, disease subtype, presence of renal impairment, extramedullary disease, and cytogenetic abnormalities. All these contribute to a varying degree of disease and patient heterogeneity among the studies that may result in a differential treatment effect. The expertise of each medical center and the treatment setting in terms of availability and drug access are particularly important as well. Interestingly, RW observations may serve as proof of concept for designing novel clinical trials, as is the case with retreatment studies. In conclusion, clinical trial and RW data are complementary, and they should be considered to improve both clinical trial design and clinical practice.

COVID-19: time to flatten the infodemic curve

Thousands of articles have been published regarding the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19). Most of them are not original research articles but reviews and editorials, and therefore, the absence of evidence-based guidelines has been evident. In parallel, the quality of manuscripts is questionable since the number of preprints has increased due to the need of fast publication of COVID-19-related articles. Furthermore, the number of retracted articles during the pandemic is exceptionally high. Media have an important role in the distribution of incorrect information, nevertheless individual people and policy makers are also responsible. As misinformation thrives in crisis periods, well-designed studies are needed to flatten the infodemic curve regarding prevention, diagnosis, and long-term complications of COVID-19.

Clear cell sugar tumor of the lung; a systematic review for a rare entity

PURPOSE

The diagnosis and management of patients with a clear cell sugar tumor of the lung (CCSTL) is challenging in the clinical practice due to its rarity.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review on this field according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We sought eligible articles in Medline through January 1st, 2019.

RESULTS

Overall, 104 CCSTL cases were identified and included in the present study. The median age at diagnosis was 52 years (interquartile range 42.5-62.5), whereas the cases were almost equally distributed among males (n=48) and females (n=49). Most of the tumors were asymptomatic (60.7%) and had a benign clinical course (73.3%). Complete tumor resection with a curative intent was the treatment of choice and pathology along with immunohistochemical indices established the diagnosis. However, long-term follow up is recommended, especially among patients with underlying genetic diseases, because disseminated disease may become evident many years following the resection of the primary lesions. Furthermore, an extensive workup for excluding metastasis from another occult primary site is necessary. The updated classification of lung neoplasms has enabled the more frequent reporting of CCSTL cases in the last decade. Interestingly, our time trend analysis showed an increase in malignant cases throughout the years.

CONCLUSION

Both collaborative multicenter studies and basic research on the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms are deemed necessary in order to optimize the diagnosis and personalize the management of patients with this rare entity.