A phase II trial of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with advanced, progressive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs)

619

Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare and heterogeneous tumors arising throughout the aerodigestive tract, which are incurable and life-limiting when metastatic. Prior studies of checkpoint inhibitors in NET patients have yielded minimal evidence of efficacy. Historically, effective therapies for advanced, progressive NET yield response rates less than 10% and progression-free survival (PFS) durations of approximately 11 months, as compared to approximately 4.5 months with placebo. Methods: We undertook a phase II basket study of atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in patients with rare cancers, and present here the data from the pancreatic NET (pNET) cohort and extrapancreatic NET (epNET) cohort, each of which included 20 patients with grade 1-2 NET that was progressive under any prior therapy. Patients received 1200mg of atezolizumab and 15mg/kg of bevacizumab IV q 21 days. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response by RECIST 1.1. Results: The confirmed objective response rate with this combination was 20% (95% CI 6-44%) in the pNET cohort and 15% (95% CI 3-38%) in the epNET cohort. The median PFS in the pNET cohort is 19.6 months (95% CI 10.6-NR), while it was 14.9 months (95% CI 6.1-NR) in the epNET cohort, 1-year PFS was 75% and 52%, respectively. The combination was well-tolerated in this patient population, with the most common related treatment-emergent adverse events being hypertension (47.5%), proteinuria (37.5%), and fatigue (35%). The most common related grade 3/4 adverse events were hypertension (20%) and proteinuria (7.5%). Conclusions: The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab demonstrated moderate clinical activity in patients with advanced NETs. As pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies were obtained for all patients, correlations with immune infiltration, mutations, and transcriptome alterations should provide additional insight into the mechanisms of response and resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT03074513.

Comparison of free breathing and respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted imaging sequences for liver imaging

BACKGROUND

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has become a useful tool in the detection, characterization, and evaluation of response to treatment of many cancers, including malignant liver lesions. DWI offers higher image contrast between lesions and normal liver tissue than other sequences. DWI images acquired at two or more b-values can be used to derive an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). DWI in the body has several technical challenges. This include ghosting artifacts, mis-registration and susceptibility artifacts. New DWI sequences have been developed to overcome some of these challenges. Our goal is to evaluate 3 new DWI sequences for liver imaging.

AIM

To qualitatively and quantitatively compare 3 DWI sequences for liver imaging: free-breathing (FB), simultaneous multislice (SMS), and prospective acquisition correction (PACE).

METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 20 patients in this prospective study. The MR study included 3 separate DWI sequences: FB-DWI, SMS-DWI, and PACE-DWI. The image quality, mean ADC, standard deviations (SD) of ADC, and ADC histogram were compared. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare qualitative image quality. A linear mixed model was used to compare the mean ADC and the SDs of the ADC values. All tests were 2-sided and P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 56 lesions (50 malignant) evaluated in this study. The mean qualitative image quality score of PACE-DWI was 4.48. This was significantly better than that of SMS-DWI (4.22) and FB-DWI (3.15) (P < 0.05). Quantitatively, the mean ADC values from the 3 different sequences did not significantly differ for each liver lesion. FB-DWI had a markedly higher variation in the SD of the ADC values than did SMS-DWI and PACE-DWI. We found statistically significant differences in the SDs of the ADC values for FB-DWI vs PACE-DWI (P < 0.0001) and for FB-DWI vs SMS-DWI (P = 0.03). The SD of the ADC values was not statistically significant for PACE-DWI and SMS-DWI (P = 0.18). The quality of the PACE-DWI ADC histograms were considered better than the SMS-DWI and FB-DWI.

CONCLUSION

Compared to FB-DWI, both PACE-DWI and SMS-DWI provide better image quality and decreased quantitative variability in the measurement of ADC values of liver lesions.

Computed Tomography-Based Biomarker Outcomes in a Prospective Trial of Preoperative FOLFIRINOX and Chemoradiation for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

Effective preoperative regimens and biomarkers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are lacking. We prospectively evaluated fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX)-based treatment and imaging-based biomarkers for borderline resectable PDAC.

METHODS

Eligible patients had treatment-naïve, histology-confirmed PDAC and one or more high-risk features: mesenteric vessel involvement, CA 19-9 level of 500 mg/dL or greater, and indeterminate metastatic lesions. Patients received modified FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiation before anticipated pancreatectomy. Tumors were classified on baseline computed tomography as high delta (well-defined interface with parenchyma) or low delta (ill-defined interface). We designated computed tomography interface response after therapy as type I (remained or became well defined) or type II (became ill defined). The study had 80% power to differentiate a 60% from 40% resection rate (α = .10). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and subgroups were compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients initiated therapy; 45% underwent pancreatectomy. The median OS was 24 months (95% CI, 16.2 to 29.6 months). For patients who did and did not undergo pancreatectomy, the median OS was 42 months (95% CI, 17.7 months to not estimable) and 14 months (95% CI, 9.0 to 24.8 months), respectively. Patients with high-delta tumors had lower 3-year PFS (4% v 40%) and 3-year OS rates (20% v 60%) than those with low-delta tumors (both P < .05). Patients with type II interface responses had lower 3-year PFS (0% v 29%) and 3-year OS rates (16% v 47%) than those with type I responses (both P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative FOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiation for high-risk borderline resectable PDAC was associated with a resection rate of 45% and median OS of approximately 2 years. Our imaging-based biomarker validation indicates that personalized treatment may be achieved using these biomarkers at baseline and post-treatment.

Abstract CT020: Phase I dose escalation of olaparib (PARP inhibitor) and selumetinib (MEK Inhibitor) combination in solid tumors with Ras pathway alterations

Background: Preclinical data from our team demonstrated that MEK inhibition increases antitumor efficacy of PARP inhibitors in tumors with Ras pathway alterations. We sought to identify dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of olaparib and selumetinib combination in solid tumors with Ras pathway alterations.

Methods: Olaparib and selumetinib were given orally twice daily. Dose escalation with three planned dose levels (DL) was performed using the modified toxicity probability interval 2 design with toxicity assessed by CTCAE v4.03. RECIST criteria (v1.1) were used to assess response. Clinical benefit was defined as partial (PR) or complete response, or stable disease for 4 months or longer.

Results: 14 patients are evaluable for toxicity in the dose escalation phase, and 12 patients are evaluable for response. Median age was 56.5 years, and 10/14 (71%) patients were female. Median number of prior treatments was 4 (1-9). Of the 14 patients enrolled, 11 had KRAS mutations, 1 amplified KRAS, 1 NRAS mutation and 1 amplified NRAS. The majority of patients had gynecologic cancers. 4 and 3 patients were treated at DL1 and DL2, respectively, and 7 patients at DL3. No DLTs were observed (Table 1). MTD was not reached. DL3 (olaparib 300mg; selumetinib 75mg) was confirmed as the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). Of 12 evaluable patients, ORR was 17%, and CBR 33%. 2 patients had a PR: 1 patient with KRAS mutant primary peritoneal cancer, and 1 with NRAS mutant ovarian cancer. 2 patients remained on treatment for more than 15 months: 1 with KRAS mutant primary peritoneal cancer (on DL-1), and 1 with KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer (DL1). All patients with clinical benefit were BRCA wildtype.

Conclusions: The combination of olaparib and selumetinib is well-tolerated at the identified RP2D. This combination also shows promising preliminary anti-tumor activity in patients with mutant RAS. Enrollment to expansion cohorts is ongoing.

Table 1Grade 3/4 and Most Common Adverse Events. NOTE: No Grade 4 Events Occurred.Adverse EventGrade 3Any GradeAbdominal pain7%7%Acneiform Rash7%71%Anemia79%Anorexia29%Constipation29%Decreased ejection fraction7%14%Decreased white blood cell count7%36%Diarrhea50%Dizziness29%Dry mouth43%Dry skin29%Dysgeusia36%Edema29%Elevated aspartate aminotransferase7%50%Elevated bilirubin7%7%Elevated CPK7%36%Elevated creatinine29%Fatigue7%64%Hepatic pain7%7%Hypophosphatemia79%Nausea57%Neutropenia7%21%Oral mucositis50%Other skin effects36%Thromboembolic event7%7%

Citation Format: Katherine C. Kurnit, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Kenneth Hess, Robert L. Coleman, Priya Bhosale, Katerina Savelieva, Filip Janku, David Hong, Aung Naing, Shubham Pant, Jordi Rodon, Timothy A. Yap, Anil K. Sood, Pamela T. Soliman, David M. Gershenson, Gordon B. Mills, Shannon N. Westin. Phase I dose escalation of olaparib (PARP inhibitor) and selumetinib (MEK Inhibitor) combination in solid tumors with Ras pathway alterations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT020.

Safety and interim results from a phase II, single-arm study of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC)

e21006

Background: MCC is an aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. Avelumab (anti-PD-L1) was FDA approved for the treatment of metastatic MCC based on an overall response rate (ORR) of 32% in chemotherapy-refractory pts. In first line, responses to PD1/PD-L1 have been reported in 56-62% of pts. Atezolizumab (Atezo) targets PD-L1 and bevacizumab (bev) inhibits VEGF. Pre-clinical data suggests atezo + bev improves antigen-specific T-cell migration, and encouraging clinical activity of this regimen has been reported in renal cell and hepatocellular carcinoma. Here we report safety and interim results of atezo + bev in MCC. Methods: In this phase II single-arm study the efficacy and safety of atezo + bev was evaluated in pts with recurrent/metastatic PD-1/PD-L1-inhibitor naive MCC. Patients were treated with atezo 1200 mg + bev 15 mg/kg IV Q3W. Primary endpoint was ORR (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent radiologist. Secondary endpoints included ORR by iRECIST, PFS, DOR, DCR, OS, and safety. Results: 11 pts enrolled. Median age was 70 (range:57-84), (7) 63% were male, and 7 (63%) had been treated with curative intent. Five (45%) pts had received platinum/etoposide (2 in the neo-adjuvant setting and 3 in first-line). Median follow-up is 9.7 months (range:2.8-15.9). Adverse events (AEs) that occurred in > 1 pt: hypertension (7), proteinuria (3), fatigue (2), peripheral edema (2), epistaxis (2), and transaminitis (2). Grade 3 AEs: hypertension (2), proteinuria (1), and auto-immune hepatitis (1); all manageable. Only 1 subject discontinued treatment due to toxicity (auto-immune hepatitis). There were no grade > 3 AEs. Objective response occurred in 7 (64%) pts, including 3 (27%) complete responses (CR). One partial response was unconfirmed (patient discontinued treatment after 1 dose of atezo/bev due to grade 3 hepatitis). 4 pts remain on treatment (1 pt with CR withdrew consent for further therapy and has not recurred). Median PFS is 6.3 months (95% CI:4.5-NA). Conclusions: Atezo + bev was well tolerated in MCC pts. Safety was consistent with that of the individual agents. Activity is encouraging with 64% ORR (27% CR rate) and mPFS of 6.3 months. Clinical trial information: NCT03074513.

Primary pulmonary angiosarcoma: case reports and review of the literature

Pulmonary artery angiosarcoma is a rare malignant vascular tumor with an aggressive clinical course and a poor prognosis. Hemoptysis and shortness of breath have been reported as common clinical presentations. The exact clinicopathology is unknown. A tissue specimen obtained by percutaneous fine-needle aspiration cytology or open/thoracoscopic biopsy can confirm the diagnosis based on histopathological and immunohistochemical features. The differential diagnosis includes pulmonary thromboembolism, vascular malformations, and lung carcinoma. There is a paucity of literature describing this tumor, with only a few case reports available. There is also a lack of standardized guidelines for management, which further worsens the survival outcome. We report 3 cases of pulmonary artery angiosarcoma and review the recent literature.

Immunotherapy response evaluation with MR elastography (MRE) in advanced HCC

230

Background: To determine changes in MRE HCC stiffness as predictor of immunotherapy response in patients with advanced HCC. Methods: This was a prospective, Institutional Review Board approved study of 15 patients with biopsy proven advanced HCC (not amenable to curative therapy), who were to be treated with Pembrolizumab. Eligible patients were > 18 years old with radiographic disease progression/intolerance to sorafenib. All patients had liver MRI with MR Elastography (MRE) and liver biopsy at baseline and at 9 weeks of therapy. HCC stiffness (kilopascals, kPa) was measured on liver MRE elastograms (stiffness maps). Change in HCC stiffness on MRE was compared with overall survival, time to disease progression, and total number of lymphocytes on targeted liver biopsy. Data cutoff date was September 1st 2018. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics including Spearman correlation ( R), Cox regression, Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher’s exact test. Results: Of the initial 15 patients, 4 withdrew from therapy, 1 patient did not undergo MRE scan, and 1 patient had MRE failure. The final 9 patients included 6 men. Median age was 70 years (range, 54-78). Etiology of liver disease was HCV (n = 4) and NASH (n = 5). HCC was moderately differentiated in 8 of 9 patients and well-differentiated in 1 patient. Median overall survival and time to progression were 52 weeks (range, 16-112) and 18 weeks (range, 9-48), respectively. Average non-tumorous liver stiffness was 3.2 kPa (range, 2.1-4.3). No significant change in non-tumor liver stiffness was seen at 9 weeks (p = 0.12). Median baseline tumor stiffness was 4.5 kPa (range, 2.4-7.5). Increase in HCC stiffness at 9 weeks was seen in 5 patients, decrease in 3 patients and no change in 1. Change in HCC stiffness at 9 weeks correlated significantly with overall survival ( R = 0.83), and time to progression ( R = 0.96), (p < 0.05). Nine patients had liver biopsy at baseline and 7 had biopsy at 9 weeks. HCC T lymphocytes on biopsy (n/mm2) significantly correlated with HCC stiffness ( R = 0.79), (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Our pilot data suggests early change in tumor stiffness may help predict better immunotherapy response in patients with advanced HCC.

First-Line Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy for Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemotherapy provides early treatment of micro-metastases and guaranteed delivery of all components of multimodality therapy for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). For locally advanced (LA) PDAC, induction chemotherapy is the standard of care. This study evaluated the use of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (Gem/nab-P) as first-line therapy for localized PDAC.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic features, treatment, and outcomes were evaluated for 99 patients with localized PDAC. The patients were staged using previously published criteria as follows: potentially resectable (PR), borderline type A (BR-A) (anatomy amenable to vascular resection), BR-B (biology suspicious for metastatic disease including high CA19-9), BR-C (comorbidities requiring medical optimization), and LA.

RESULTS

The 99 patients (PR/BR/LA: 45/14/40) were treated with Gem/nab-P. Clinical staging showed that 20 patients had PR or BR-A disease, whereas 39 patients had BR-B or BR-C disease. The BR-B+C cases included one or more of the following: age of 80 years or older (13%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 2 or more (13%), moderate to severe comorbidities (55%), CA19-9 of 1000 or higher (28%), and suspicion for metastases (21%). The majority of the patients received biweekly Gem/nab-P dosing, which was well tolerated. Pancreatectomy was performed for 12 (60%) of 20 patients with PR+BR-A, 2 (5%) of 39 patients with BR-B+C, and 1 (3%) of 40 patients with LA disease. During a median follow-up period of 26 months, the median overall survival (OS) period was 18 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.6-20.5 months) for all the patients, 17 months (95% CI, 14.6-19.5 months) for the unresected patients, and not reached for the resected patients (p = 0.028 for resected vs unresected patients).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of patients with radiographically resectable PDAC albeit aggressive biology (BR-B), medically inoperable conditions (BR-C), or both received biweekly first-line Gem/nab-P. The resection rates were lower for the BR-B/BR-C patients than for the PR/BR-A patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19-1.00; p = 0.05).

Low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer: what a radiologist should know

Ovarian cancer accounts for the death of over 100,000 females every year and is the most lethal gynecological malignancy. Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) have been found to represent two distinct entities based on their molecular differences, clinical course, and response to chemotherapy. Currently, all ovarian cancers are staged according to the revised staging system of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). Imaging plays an integral role in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of ovarian cancers. This review will be based on the two-tier grading system of epithelial ovarian cancers, with the main emphasis on serous ovarian cancer, and the role of imaging to characterize low-grade vs high-grade tumors and monitor disease recurrence during follow-up.

A Visually Apparent and Quantifiable CT Imaging Feature Identifies Biophysical Subtypes of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a heterogeneous disease with variable presentations and natural histories of disease. We hypothesized that different morphologic characteristics of PDAC tumors on diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans would reflect their underlying biology.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We developed a quantitative method to categorize the PDAC morphology on pretherapy CT scans from multiple datasets of patients with resectable and metastatic disease and correlated these patterns with clinical/pathologic measurements. We modeled macroscopic lesion growth computationally to test the effects of stroma on morphologic patterns, hypothesizing that the balance of proliferation and local migration rates of the cancer cells would determine tumor morphology.

RESULTS

In localized and metastatic PDAC, quantifying the change in enhancement on CT scans at the interface between tumor and parenchyma (delta) demonstrated that patients with conspicuous (high-delta) tumors had significantly less stroma, higher likelihood of multiple common pathway mutations, more mesenchymal features, higher likelihood of early distant metastasis, and shorter survival times compared with those with inconspicuous (low-delta) tumors. Pathologic measurements of stromal and mesenchymal features of the tumors supported the mathematical model's underlying theory for PDAC growth.

CONCLUSIONS

At baseline diagnosis, a visually striking and quantifiable CT imaging feature reflects the molecular and pathological heterogeneity of PDAC, and may be used to stratify patients into distinct subtypes. Moreover, growth patterns of PDAC may be described using physical principles, enabling new insights into diagnosis and treatment of this deadly disease.

Imaging and staging of neuroendocrine cervical cancer

Neuroendocrine cervical cancer (NECC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of cervical cancer, accounting for less than 2% of cervical tumors. They are divided into low-grade and high-grade tumors. High-grade NECC is associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) 18 and to a smaller extent type 16. The most common molecular alterations in NECC include PIK3CA, KRAS, and TP53 mutations. Immunohistochemical staining for CD56, synaptophysin, and chromogranin is a helpful tool in the diagnosis. NECCs pose a significant clinical and therapeutic challenge because of their aggressive nature which is explained by their tendency towards early nodal and hematogenous spread. They have a median survival of 21-22 months, compared to 10 years in cervical squamous cell carcinomas. NECCs have a homogeneous high T2 signal intensity, homogeneous contrast enhancement and lower ADC values in MRI, compared to non-neuroendocrine tumors of the cervix. It is recommended to treat NECC with a multimodality therapeutic approach combining radical hysterectomy, systemic chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. The objective of this manuscript is to address the pathogenesis of NECC, elaborate the role of radiological imaging in the diagnosis and staging of NECCs, evaluate their prognosis, and summarize the suggested management plans for this lethal disease.

Consultation and citation rates for prior imaging studies and documents in radiology

Frequently, the consensus conclusion after quality assurance conferences in radiology is that whatever mistake was made could have been avoided if more prior images or documents had been consulted. It is generally assumed that anything that was not specifically cited in the report had not been consulted. Is it actually safe to assume that an image or document that is not cited was also not consulted? It is this question that this investigation addresses. In this Institutional Review Board-approved study, one observer watched the board-certified radiologists while they interpreted imaging studies and issued reports. He recorded what type of study was being interpreted [either computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or conventional radiography (x-ray)]. He also recorded the number and type of prior imaging studies and documents that were consulted during the interpretation. These observations were then compared with the signed report to determine how many of the consulted imaging studies and documents were cited. Of the 198 previous imaging studies that the radiologists consulted, 116 (58.6%) were cited in a report. Of the 285 documents consulted, 3 (1.1%) were cited in a report. This difference in citation rate was statistically significant (p<0.0001). It cannot be safely assumed that an older radiologic image or medical document was not consulted during radiologic interpretation merely because it is not cited in the report. Radiologists often consult more old studies than they cite, and they do not cite the majority of prior documents that they consult.

Multi-institutional survey on imaging practice patterns in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To study the practice patterns for performance and interpretation of CT/MRI imaging studies in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at multiple institutions using a survey-based assessment.

METHODS

In this study, abdominal radiologists/body imagers on the Society of Abdominal Radiology disease-focused panel for PDAC and from multiple institutions participated in an online survey. The survey was designed to investigate the imaging and reporting practice patterns for PDAC. The survey questionnaire addressed the experience of referring providers, choice of imaging modality for diagnosis and follow-up of PDAC, structured imaging templates utilization for PDAC, and experiences with the use of structured reports.

RESULTS

The response rate was 89.6% (43/48), with majority of the respondents working in a teaching hospital or academic research center (95.4%). While 86% of radiologists reported use of structured reporting templates in their practice, only 60.5% used standardized templates specific to PDAC. This lower percentage was despite most of them (77%) being aware of existence of PDAC-specific templates and recognizing their benefits, such as preference by referring providers (83%), improved uniformity (100%), and higher accuracy of reports (76.2%). The common impediments to the use of PDAC-specific templates were interference with efficient workflow (67.5%), lack of interest (52.5%), and complexity of existing templates (47.5%). With regards to imaging practice, 92.7% (n = 40/43) of respondents reported performing dynamic multiphasic pancreatic protocol CT for evaluation of patients with initial suspicion or staging of PDAC.

CONCLUSION

Structured reporting templates for PDAC are not universally utilized in subspecialty abdominal/body imaging practices due to concerns of interference with efficient workflow and complexity of templates. Multiphasic pancreatic protocol CT is most frequently performed for evaluation of PDAC.

Utility of (18) F-FDG PET/CT and CECT in conjunction with serum CA 19-9 for detecting recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The roles of different cross-sectional imaging in evaluating the recurrence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma are not well established. We evaluated the utility of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the diagnosis of recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma in conjunction with the tumor marker CA 19-9.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent CECT and FDG PET/CT along with serum CA 19-9 measurement as a follow-up or on a clinical suspicion of recurrent disease after initial surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Two observers blinded to the other imaging modality results retrospectively reviewed and interpreted the images in consensus using a three-point scale (negative, equivocal, or positive). Pathologic analysis by biopsy or further clinical and radiologic follow-up determined the true status of the suspected recurrences. The imaging results were compared with CA 19-9 levels and true disease status.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included in the study. Thirty-three patients (85%) had proven recurrent cancer and six patients (15%) had no evidence of disease. Twenty-four patients had elevated CA 19-9 and 15 patients had normal CA 19-9. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for recurrence were 90.9%, 100.0%, and 92.3% for PET/CT and 72.2%, 66.6%, and 71.7% for CECT, respectively. Sensitivity for locoregional recurrence was 94.4% for PET/CT but only 61.1% for CECT. PET/CT detected recurrence in 12 patients who had normal levels of CA 19-9. PET/CT showed lesions not visible on CECT in five (15%) patients. Although the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT were higher than those of CECT, they were not statistically significant (p = 0.489 and p = 0.1489, respectively).

CONCLUSION

FDG PET/CT has a high sensitivity for pancreatic cancer recurrence. Normal CA 19-9 does not necessarily exclude these recurrences. FDG PET/CT is useful when CECT is equivocal and can detect recurrence in patients with normal CA 19-9.

Genetics of pancreatic cancer and implications for therapy

Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease with a dismal 5-year prognosis. Knowledge of its genetics may help in identifying new methods for patient screening, and cancer treatment. In this review, we will describe the most common mutations responsible for the genesis of pancreatic cancer and their impact on screening, patterns of disease progression, and therapy.

First line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

369

Background: Chemotherapy is widely used as a component of treatment of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Pre-operative chemotherapy is associated with early treatment of micro-metastases and guaranteed delivery of all components of multimodality therapy. For locally advanced (LA) PDAC, induction chemotherapy is standard of care. We evaluated the use of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (Gem/nab-P) as first-line therapy in localized PDAC. Methods: Records of pts with localized PDAC who initiated Gem/nab-P at a single institution from 2013-2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathologic features, dose and outcomes were evaluated. Pts were staged using our previously published criteria: potentially resectable (PR), borderline type A (BR-A) (anatomy amenable to vascular resection), BR-B (biology suspicious for metastatic disease including high CA19-9), BR-C (co-morbidities requiring medical optimization), and LA. Co-morbidities were classified using adult comorbidity evaluation-27 score. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan Meier method. Results:99 pts [M/F: 50/49; median age: 70 yrs (range 30-85); PR/BR/LA: 45/14/40] were treated with Gem/nab-P. Clinical staging showed PR+BR-A/BR-B+C: 20/39. BR-B+C included one or more of the following factors: age ≥80 yrs [13%], ECOG PS ≥2 [13%], moderate/severe co-morbidities [55%], CA19-9≥1000 [28%], suspicion for metastatic disease [21%]. Majority of pts received biweekly Gem/nab-P dosing [standard/biweekly/other: 10/80/9] with minimal grade 4 toxicity. 45/99 pts received chemoradiation after Gem/nab-P [30Gy/50.4Gy: 15/30]. 12/20 (60%) PR+BR-A, 2/39 (5%) BR-B+C and 1/40 (3%) LA pts underwent pancreatectomy. 13/15 resected pts received adjuvant chemotherapy. At median follow-up of 26 mo, median OS was 18 (95% CI: 15.6-20.5) mo for all, 17 (95% CI: 14.6-19.5) mo for unresected and not reached for resected pts (p = 0.03). Conclusions: A significant number of pts with resectable PDAC albeit aggressive biology (BR-B) and/or medically inoperable disease (BR-C) received first-line Gem/nab-P; resection rates were lower compared to PR/BR-A pts. Biweekly dosing is being used in localized PDAC and is well tolerated.

Imaging-based biomarkers: Changes in the tumor interface of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on computed tomography scans indicate response to cytotoxic therapy

BACKGROUND

The assessment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) response to therapy remains challenging. The objective of this study was to investigate whether changes in the tumor/parenchyma interface are associated with response.

METHODS

Computed tomography (CT) scans before and after therapy were reviewed in 4 cohorts: cohort 1 (99 patients with stage I/II PDAC who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery); cohort 2 (86 patients with stage IV PDAC who received chemotherapy), cohort 3 (94 patients with stage I/II PDAC who received protocol‐based neoadjuvant gemcitabine chemoradiation), and cohort 4 (47 patients with stage I/II PDAC who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and were prospectively followed in a registry). The tumor/parenchyma interface was visually classified as either a type I response (the interface remained or became well defined) or a type II response (the interface became poorly defined) after therapy. Consensus (cohorts 1‐3) and individual (cohort 4) visual scoring was performed. Changes in enhancement at the interface were quantified using a proprietary platform.

RESULTS

In cohort 1, type I responders had a greater probability of achieving a complete or near‐complete pathologic response (21% vs 0%; P = .01). For cohorts 1, 2, and 3, type I responders had significantly longer disease‐free and overall survival, independent of traditional covariates of outcomes and of baseline and normalized cancer antigen 19‐9 levels. In cohort 4, 2 senior radiologists achieved a κ value of 0.8, and the interface score was associated with overall survival. The quantitative method revealed high specificity and sensitivity in classifying patients as type I or type II responders (with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.92 in cohort 1, 0.96 in cohort 2, and 0.89 in cohort 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes at the PDAC/parenchyma interface may serve as an early predictor of response to therapy. Cancer 2018;124:1701‐9. © 2018 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

An imaging feature of pancreatic cancer is identified that indicates a response to cytotoxic therapies. This may be helpful as an early predictor of response for clinical trials and for deciding whether to change therapy.

Feasibility of Contrast-Enhanced Intraoperative Ultrasound for Detection and Characterization of Renal Mass Undergoing Open Partial Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

To determine the feasibility of obtaining intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging in patients undergoing open partial nephrectomy for renal cancer. We hypothesize that the study was feasible and the addition of CEUS would improve lesion identification and characterization.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 10 patients with known renal mass scheduled for intraoperative ultrasound-guided open partial nephrectomy. After dissection and exposure of the kidney by the surgeon, an intraoperative pre- and post-CEUS was performed by the radiologist. Feasibility was defined as successful imaging in 8 of 10 patients with intraoperative CEUS. Image quality, lesion conspicuity/contrast, lesion vascularity, morphology, and size were assessed and graded with pre- and post-contrast images.

RESULTS

Intraoperative ultrasound was successfully acquired in 10 of 11 patients for renal mass detection and characterization. One study was canceled intraoperatively as a result of clinical complications related to a difficult surgery. Tumor size ranged from 1.3 to 4.2 cm. All lesions were solid. No additional lesions were found on CEUS compared with baseline imaging. Image quality post-contrast ranged from acceptable to excellent. There were no adverse events recorded for all 10 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our feasibility study consisting of 10 patients, CEUS for detection and characterization of renal mass undergoing open partial nephrectomy was feasible and safe. Because intraoperative ultrasound during open partial nephrectomy can affect the extent of surgery, CEUS can be used to help detect and characterize renal mass for surgical planning/resection intraoperatively.

Phase II trial of bevacizumab with dose-dense paclitaxel as first-line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess the tolerability and efficacy of bevacizumab with carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel as first-line adjuvant therapy for advanced stage ovarian cancer.

METHODS

After IRB approval, this single-institution, phase II study enrolled patients with stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer after primary cytoreductive surgery to treatment with carboplatin (AUC 5), weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2), and bevacizumab (15mg/kg) every 3weeks for at least 6cycles. The primary endpoint was tolerability of at least 4cycles of therapy, with a target treatment success rate of >60%. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate. Plasma biomarkers were analyzed by the multiplex ELISA assays.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled with 30 evaluable patients receiving at least one cycle of combination treatment. Twenty-three patients (77%) were able to complete at least 4cycles of therapy per protocol, and the posterior probability that the treatment success rate is >60% is 0.77. Twenty-one patients (70%) were able to complete ≥6cycles of therapy. Median PFS was 22.4months for patients with optimal (R0) compared to 16.9months for optimal≤1cm (HR 1.71, 95% CI 0.58-4.98, p=0.33), and 16.9months for suboptimal>1cm (HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.05-13.34, p=0.04) disease. Increases in mean Flt-3L was significantly higher in responders versus non-responders (83.4 vs. 28pg/mL, p=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant bevacizumab with dose-dense chemotherapy is associated with acceptable toxicity and a high likelihood of completing 4cycles of therapy. Dynamic changes in Flt-3L may represent a predictive marker to treatment response.

Radiogenomics of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Multireader Multi-Institutional Study from the Cancer Genome Atlas Ovarian Cancer Imaging Research Group

Purpose To evaluate interradiologist agreement on assessments of computed tomography (CT) imaging features of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), to assess their associations with time-to-disease progression (TTP) and HGSOC transcriptomic profiles (Classification of Ovarian Cancer [CLOVAR]), and to develop an imaging-based risk score system to predict TTP and CLOVAR profiles. Materials and Methods This study was a multireader, multi-institutional, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective analysis of 92 patients with HGSOC (median age, 61 years) with abdominopelvic CT before primary cytoreductive surgery available through the Cancer Imaging Archive. Eight radiologists from the Cancer Genome Atlas Ovarian Cancer Imaging Research Group developed and independently recorded the following CT features: characteristics of primary ovarian mass(es), presence of definable mesenteric implants and infiltration, presence of other implants, presence and distribution of peritoneal spread, presence and size of pleural effusions and ascites, lymphadenopathy, and distant metastases. Interobserver agreement for CT features was assessed, as were univariate and multivariate associations with TTP and CLOVAR mesenchymal profile (worst prognosis). Results Interobserver agreement for some features was strong (eg, α = .78 for pleural effusion and ascites) but was lower for others (eg, α = .08 for intraparenchymal splenic metastases). Presence of peritoneal disease in the right upper quadrant (P = .0003), supradiaphragmatic lymphadenopathy (P = .0004), more peritoneal disease sites (P = .0006), and nonvisualization of a discrete ovarian mass (P = .0037) were associated with shorter TTP. More peritoneal disease sites (P = .0025) and presence of pouch of Douglas implants (P = .0045) were associated with CLOVAR mesenchymal profile. Combinations of imaging features contained predictive signal for TTP (concordance index = 0.658; P = .0006) and CLOVAR profile (mean squared deviation = 1.776; P = .0043). Conclusion These results provide some evidence of the clinical and biologic validity of these image features. Interobserver agreement is strong for some features, but could be improved for others. ^© RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.