Understanding Hospital-Level Patterns of Nonoperative Management for Low-risk Thyroid and Kidney Cancer

IMPORTANCE

There is a growing trend toward conservative management for certain low-risk cancers. Hospital and health-system factors may play a role in determining how these patients are managed.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the contribution of hospitals on patients' odds of nonoperative management for low-risk cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this cross-sectional study, individuals with low-risk papillary thyroid cancer and solitary kidney masses were identified, and those receiving nonoperative management vs surgery were compared. Patients with low-risk thyroid cancer and kidney cancer from 2015 to 2017 eligible for nonoperative management according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines within the National Cancer Database were included. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to March 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

For each facility, the proportion of these patients who received operative and nonoperative management was calculated. A mixed-effects logistic regression model with a hospital-level random effects term was used to calculate factors associated with nonoperative management. Between-hospital variability was assessed using ranked caterpillar plots.

RESULTS

There were 19 570 individuals with low-risk thyroid cancer (15 344 women [78.4%]; mean [SD] age, 51.74 [95% CI, 51.39-52.08] years) and 41 403 with kidney cancer (25 253 men [61.0%]; mean [SD] age, 61.93 [95% CI, 61.70-62.17] years). In the group with low-risk thyroid cancer, 2.1% (419 patients) received nonoperative management, and in the group with kidney cancer, 9.5% (3928 patients) received nonoperative management. This varied between hospitals from 1.1% (95% CI, 1.0%-1.1%) in the bottom decile to 10.3% (95% CI, 8.0%-12.4%) in the top decile for low-risk thyroid cancer, and from 4.3% (95% CI, 4.1%-4.4%) in the bottom decile to 24.6% (95% CI, 22.7%-26.5%) in the top decile for small kidney masses. For both cancers, age was associated with increased odds of nonoperative treatment. The hospital-level odds of nonoperative management of thyroid and kidney cancer using unadjusted probabilities (observed proportions) were minimally correlated (Spearman ρ = .33; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study suggest that although health systems factors may be associated with the tendency to pursue nonoperative management, hospital-level factors may differ when comparing unrelated cancers.

Clinical Applications of Machine Learning for Urolithiasis and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Previous systematic reviews related to machine learning (ML) in urology often overlooked the literature related to endourology. Therefore, we aim to conduct a more focused systematic review examining the use of ML algorithms for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or urolithiasis. In addition, we are the first group to evaluate these articles using the STREAM-URO framework.

METHODS

Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases were conducted from inception through July 12, 2021. Keywords included those related to ML, endourology, urolithiasis, and BPH. Two reviewers screened the citations that were eligible for title, abstract and full-text screening, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Two reviewers extracted information from the studies, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. The data collected was then qualitatively synthesized by consensus. Two reviewers evaluated each article according to the STREAM-URO checklist with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer.

RESULTS

After identifying 459 unique citations, 63 articles were retained for data extraction. Most articles consisted of tabular (n=32) and computer vision (n=23) tasks. The two most common problem types were classification (n=40) and regression (n=12). In general, most studies utilized neural networks as their ML algorithm (n=36). Among the 63 studies retrieved, 58 were related to urolithiasis and five focused on BPH. The urolithiasis studies were designed for outcome prediction (n=20), stone classification (n=18), diagnostics (n=17), and therapeutics (n=3). The BPH studies were designed for outcome prediction (n=2), diagnostics (n=2), and therapeutics (n=1). On average, the urolithiasis and BPH articles met 13.8 (SD 2.6), and 13.4 (4.1) of the 26 STREAM-URO framework criteria, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of the retrieved studies successfully helped with outcome prediction, diagnostics, and therapeutics for both urolithiasis and BPH. While ML shows great promise in improving patient care, it is important to adhere to the recently developed STREAM-URO framework to ensure the development of high-quality ML studies.

Randomized clinical trial of BCG vaccine in patients with convalescent COVID-19: Clinical evolution, adverse events, and humoral immune response

BACKGROUND

The Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine may confer cross-protection against viral diseases in adults. This study evaluated BCG vaccine cross-protection in adults with convalescent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHOD

This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04369794).

SETTING

University Community Health Center and Municipal Outpatient Center in South America.

PATIENTS

a total of 378 adult patients with convalescent COVID-19 were included.

INTERVENTION

single intradermal BCG vaccine (n = 183) and placebo (n = 195).

MEASUREMENTS

the primary outcome was clinical evolution. Other outcomes included adverse events and humoral immune responses for up to 6 months.

RESULTS

A significantly higher proportion of BCG patients with anosmia and ageusia recovered at the 6-week follow-up visit than placebo (anosmia: 83.1% vs. 68.7% healed, p = 0.043, number needed to treat [NNT] = 6.9; ageusia: 81.2% vs. 63.4% healed, p = 0.032, NNT = 5.6). BCG also prevented the appearance of ageusia in the following weeks: seven in 113 (6.2%) BCG recipients versus 19 in 126 (15.1%) placebos, p = 0.036, NNT = 11.2. BCG did not induce any severe or systemic adverse effects. The most common and expected adverse effects were local vaccine lesions, erythema (n = 152; 86.4%), and papules (n = 111; 63.1%). Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 humoral response measured by N protein immunoglobulin G titer and seroneutralization by interacting with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor suggest that the serum of BCG-injected patients may neutralize the virus at lower specificity; however, the results were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

BCG vaccine is safe and offers cross-protection against COVID-19 with potential humoral response modulation.

LIMITATIONS

No severely ill patients were included.

Comparison of Long-term Outcomes for Young and Healthy Patients with cT1a and cT3a Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Partial Nephrectomy

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is recommended for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of <4 cm. We hypothesized that there is no difference in all-cause mortality (ACM) between cT1a, cT1b, and cT3a <4 cm RCC following PN. The National Cancer Database was interrogated to identify patients aged <60 yr with a Charlson comorbidity index ≤1 diagnosed between 2004 and 2017. Cox proportional-hazard models stratified for cT stage were used to predict 10-yr ACM. A total of 30 195 patients (25 121 cT1a, 4884 cT1b, and 190 cT3a <4 cm) who underwent PN with median follow-up of 64.36 mo (interquartile range 42.91-93.77) were included. Cox analysis revealed no significant difference in 10-yr ACM between cT1a and cT3a <4 cm (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-1.90; p = 0.88). However, the cT1b group had higher ACM (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.48; p < 0.01). The positive surgical margin (PSM) rate was higher for cT3a <4 cm than for cT1a tumors (14.2% vs 6.3%; p < 0.01). However, there was no difference in 10-yr ACM rate between cT1a and cT3a <4 cm (10.9% vs 9.7%; p = 0.42). Our results suggest that PN is an option for cT3a RCC <4 cm, particularly in cases in which maximum nephron preservation is essential, such as patients with chronic kidney disease or a solitary kidney, although a higher PSM risk should be appreciated. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that partial removal of the kidney for localized advanced kidney cancer is safe. The rate of surgical margins positive for the presence of tumor is higher in localized advanced kidney cancer than for less advanced cancers, but there was no difference in 10-year predicted mortality.

Top 100 Urology Influencers on Twitter: Is Social Media Influence Associated with Academic Impact?

BACKGROUND

Social media use in medicine has exploded, with uptake by most physicians and patients. There is a risk of dissemination of inaccurate information about urological conditions on social media. Physicians, as key opinion leaders, must play a role in sharing evidence-based information through social media.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and describe the top 100 urology influencers on the Twitter social media platform and to correlate Twitter influence with academic impact in urology.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Twitter influence scores for the search topic "urology" were collected in April 2022 using published methodology. The top 100 personal accounts with the highest computed scores were linked to individuals' names, all-time h index, geographic location, specialty, attributed sex, and board certification status in this cross-sectional study.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We examined the correlation between influence rank and h index.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Of the top 100 Twitter influencers on the topic of urology, the majority are from the USA (64%), male (85%), and practicing urologists (91%). Some 93% of US urology influencers are board-certified. Only 22 of the 50 US states are represented. The second most frequent country is the UK, with ten urology influencers. The median all-time h index is 42 (interquartile range 28.25-58). There is a weak positive correlation between influence rank and h index (r = 0.23; p = 0.02). Limitations of the study include the inability to validate the accuracy of the proprietary ranking algorithm and investigation of just one social media platform.

CONCLUSIONS

The top Twitter influencers in urology are mostly board-certified US urologists. Collectively, influencers have a relatively greater academic impact in comparison to the average urologist, although there is a weak positive correlation between Twitter influence and h index among top Twitter influencers.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Given the explosion of medical information on Twitter, we report the personal accounts with the greatest impact for the topic of "urology". We found that most urology influencers on Twitter are US board-certified urologists with a strong research history.

Does the 5-item Frailty Index predict surgical complications of endoscopic surgical management for benign prostatic obstruction? An analysis of the ACS-NSQIP

PURPOSE

To assess whether the 5-item Frailty Index (5i-FI) predicts surgical complications of endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and examine the rates of these complications across BPO surgical modalities adjusting for patient frailty.

METHODS

The ACS-NSQIP registry was queried for patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), and laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) between 2009 and 2019. Patients' frailties were estimated using the 5i-FI. We assessed the association between 5i-FI and the following endpoints: all complications, major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3), length of stay (LOS) ≥ 2 days, and 30-day postoperative readmission. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to account for selection bias in treatment allocation. IPTW-adjusted rates for 30-day complications were compared between surgical modalities.

RESULTS

The cohort included 38,399 (62.6%) TURP, 19,121 (31.2%) PVP, and 3797 (6.2%) LEP. Men with 5i-FI score ≥ 2 were more likely to receive TURP (22.7%) and PVP (22.5%) than LEP (18.8%). 5i-FI ≥ 2 was associated with higher odds of all complications (OR 1.50), major complications (OR 1.63), LOS ≥ 2 (OR 1.31), and readmission (OR 1.65). After IPTW, LEP had the lowest rates for all complications (6.29%; 95%CI 5.48-7.20), major complications (2.30%; 95%CI 1.83-2.89), and readmission (3.80%; 95%CI 3.18-4.53).

CONCLUSION

The 5i-FI score is an independent predictor of 30-day postoperative surgical complications after endoscopic BPO surgery. After IPTW, LEP and PVP were associated with lower rates of complications than TURP. However, frail patients were less likely to undergo PVP and LEP. Preoperative frailty assessment could improve risk stratification before BPO surgery.

A novel prognostic model predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving standard chemotherapy: A multi-trial cohort analysis

PURPOSE

Generalizable, updated, and easy-to-use prognostic models for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are lacking. We developed a nomogram predicting the overall survival (OS) of mCRPC patients receiving standard chemotherapy using data from five randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the control arm of five RCTs (ASCENT 2, VENICE, CELGENE/MAINSAIL, ENTHUSE 14, and ENTHUSE 33) were randomly split between training (n = 1636, 70%) and validation cohorts (n = 700, 30%). In the training cohort, Cox regression tested the prognostic significance of all available variables as a predictor of OS. Independent predictors of OS on multivariable analysis were used to construct a novel multivariable model (nomogram). The accuracy of this model was tested in the validation cohort using time-dependent area under the curve (tAUC) and calibration curves.

RESULTS

Most of the patients were aged 65-74 years (44.5%) and the median (interquartile range) follow-up time was 13.9 (8.9-20.2) months. At multivariable analysis, the following were independent predictors of OS in mCRPC patients: sites of metastasis (visceral vs. bone metastasis, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24), prostate-specific antigen (HR: 1.00), aspartate transaminase (HR: 1.01), alkaline phosphatase (HR: 1.00), body mass index (HR: 0.97), and hemoglobin (≥13 g/dl vs. <11 g/dl, HR: 0.41; all p < 0.05). A nomogram based on these variables was developed and showed favorable discrimination (tAUC at 12 and 24 months: 73% and 72%, respectively) and calibration characteristics on external validation.

CONCLUSION

A new prognostic model to predict OS of patients with mCRPC undergoing first line chemotherapy was developed. This can help urologists/oncologists in counseling patients and might be useful to better stratify patients for future clinical trials.

MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a phase 2b, multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Men with grade group 2 or 3 prostate cancer are often considered ineligible for active surveillance; some patients with grade group 2 prostate cancer who are managed with active surveillance will have early disease progression requiring radical therapy. This study aimed to investigate whether MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy can safely reduce treatment burden for patients with localised grade group 2 or 3 intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

METHODS

In this single-arm, multicentre, phase 2b study conducted at eight health-care centres in the USA, we recruited men aged 50 years and older with unilateral, MRI-visible, primary, intermediate-risk, previously untreated prostate adenocarcinoma (prostate-specific antigen ≤20 ng/mL, grade group 2 or 3; tumour classification ≤T2) confirmed on combined biopsy (combining MRI-targeted and systematic biopsies). MRI-guided focused ultrasound energy, sequentially titrated to temperatures sufficient for tissue ablation (about 60-70°C), was delivered to the index lesion and a planned margin of 5 mm or more of normal tissue, using real-time magnetic resonance thermometry for intraoperative monitoring. Co-primary outcomes were oncological outcomes (absence of grade group 2 and higher cancer in the treated area at 6-month and 24-month combined biopsy; when 24-month biopsy data were not available and grade group 2 or higher cancer had occurred in the treated area at 6 months, the 6-month biopsy results were included in the final analysis) and safety (adverse events up to 24 months) in all patients enrolled in the study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01657942, and is no longer recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between May 4, 2017, and Dec 21, 2018, we assessed 194 patients for eligibility and treated 101 patients with MRI-guided focused ultrasound. Median age was 63 years (IQR 58-67) and median concentration of prostate-specific antigen was 5·7 ng/mL (IQR 4·2-7·5). Most cancers were grade group 2 (79 [78%] of 101). At 24 months, 78 (88% [95% CI 79-94]) of 89 men had no evidence of grade group 2 or higher prostate cancer in the treated area. No grade 4 or grade 5 treatment-related adverse events were reported, and only one grade 3 adverse event (urinary tract infection) was reported. There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

24-month biopsy outcomes show that MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy is safe and effectively treats grade group 2 or 3 prostate cancer. These results support focal therapy for select patients and its use in comparative trials to determine if a tissue-preserving approach is effective in delaying or eliminating the need for radical whole-gland treatment in the long term.

FUNDING

Insightec and the National Cancer Institute.

Association Between Alcohol Intake and Prostate Specific Antigen Screening: Results From a National Behavioral Survey

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between self-reported alcohol use and prostate cancer (PCa) screening using the U.S.-based Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of men aged between 55 and 69 who responded to the PSA screening and alcohol consumption portions of the 2018 BRFSS survey was performed. Alcohol consumption was assessed according with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition of binge and heavy drinking. Rates of PSA screening between binge and non-binge drinkers and among heavy and non-heavy drinkers were compared. A complex weighted multivariable logistic regression model, adjusted for socio-economic covariates and weighted using BRFSS sample weights, was used to test the association between the self-reported alcohol use and the odds of PSA screening.

RESULTS

Among 57,774 men eligible for PCa screening, there were 8,276 binge drinkers with an unadjusted PSA screening prevalence of 37% versus 40% in the non-binge drinking group (P = .018). Among 3,836 heavy drinkers, the unadjusted PSA screening prevalence was 34% versus 40% in non-heavy drinkers (P < .001). In the multivariable analysis, only heavy drinking status was significantly associated with a lower odds of PSA screening (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.98, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Given that alcohol overuse may increase the risk of developing cancer, our finding of lower utilization of PCa screening among heavy drinkers is noteworthy. Efforts to support guideline-concordant cancer screening among heavy drinkers may represent an important strategy to reduce the burden of cancer in these men.

Access to definitive treatment and survival for intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer at hospital systems serving health disparity populations

6555

Background: Socioeconomic and racial disparities in prostate cancer (PCa) can be attributed to patient-level and physician-level factors. However, there is growing interest in investigating the role of the facility of care in driving cancer disparities. Therefore, we sought to examine receipt of guideline-concordant definitive treatment, time to treatment initiation (TTI), and survival for men with PCa receiving care at hospital systems serving health disparity populations (HSDPs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (2004-2016) among men with intermediate-risk or high-risk PCa eligible for definitive treatment. The primary outcomes were receipt of definitive treatment and TTI within 90 days of diagnosis. The secondary outcome was survival. We defined HSDPs as minority-serving hospitals – facilities in the highest decile of proportion of Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) or Hispanic cancer patients – and/or high-burden safety-net hospitals – facilities in the highest quartile of proportion of underinsured patients. We used mixed-effect models with facility-level random intercept to compare outcomes between HSDPs and non-HSDPs among the entire cohort and among men who received definitive treatment. We evaluated interactions between HSDP status and race for each of the outcomes. Results: The cohort included 821,931 men with intermediate-risk or high-risk PCa. We included 968 non-HSDPs (72.2%) and 373 HSDPs (27.8%) facilities. Treatment at HSDPs was associated with lower odds of receipt of definitive treatment (aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.57-0.71; p < 0.001), lower odds of TTI within 90 days of diagnosis (aOR 0.74; 95% CI 0.68-0.79; p < 0.001), and worse survival (aHR 1.05; 95% CI 1.02-1.09; p = 0.003). However, no difference was found in survival among patients who received definitive treatment. NHB men at HSDPs had also worse outcomes than NHB men treated at non-HSDPs as well as NHW men treated at HSDPs (Table). Conclusions: Patients treated at HSDPs were less likely to receive timely definitive treatment and had worse survival. NHB men have worse outcomes than NHW at HSDPs. NHB men with PCa remain largely disadvantaged since they are more likely to be treated at hospitals with worse outcomes and have worse outcomes than other patients at those same institutions. [Table: see text]

Risk and predictors of ipilimumab-associated cardiac adverse events among patients treated for melanoma: A national cohort analysis

e14592

Background: Ipilimumab is a CTLA-4 inhibitor widely used to treat advanced melanoma. While ipilimumab-induced cardiac immune-related adverse events (irAE) have been reported, there is a paucity of data from large cohorts. We investigated the risk and predictors of ipilimumab-associated cardiac irAE in a national cohort of patients with cutaneous melanoma. Methods: Using SEER-Medicare linked data, we compared the risk of cardiac irAE between patients treated with ipilimumab with or without concomitant treatment for cutaneous melanoma and controls not treated with ipilimumab following a primary diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. We excluded patients ≤65 years and patients with cardiac comorbidities diagnosed within one year prior to the initiation of melanoma treatment. The primary endpoint was the incidence of at least one cardiac irAE after ipilimumab initiation including acute pericarditis, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, conduction disorders, cardiac dysthymias, acute heart failure, and takotsubo syndrome. To estimate the risk of cardiac irAE, we conducted a multivariable competing-risk analysis adjusting for death of any cause within one year of treatment as a competing event. Then, we constructed a stepwise logistic regression to assess the predictors of having at least one cardiac irAE within one year of ipilimumab initiation. Subgroup analysis was conducted among patients who received ipilimumab only. The models were adjusted for patient demographics, disease stage, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), history of hypertension, autoimmune disease, end stage renal disease (ESRD), chronic anticoagulant, and steroid use. Results: The cohort included 715 patients treated with ipilimumab and 22,070 controls. In the ipilimumab arm, 23.4% had metastatic disease, 9.5% had a history of autoimmune disease, and 2.2% had CCI≥2. The incidence rates of cardiac irAE among patients who received ipilimumab and among the control group were 23.3 and 13.6 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. We found that patients who received ipilimumab had a higher risk of cardiac irAE compared to controls (adjusted hazard ratio 1.87; 95%CI 1.50-2.32; p < 0.001). In addition to ipilimumab treatment, other predictors of cardiac irAE included male gender, older age, patients with metastatic disease, history of autoimmune disease, hypertension, ESRD, anticoagulant use, and CCI≥2. The predictors of cardiac irAE were also consistent in the subgroup analysis of patients who received ipilimumab only. Conclusions: Patients who received ipilimumab with or without concomitant treatment for cutaneous melanoma had a higher risk for cardiac irAE. Predictors of cardiac irAE help tailor therapy according to patients’ risk profiles.

Anti-Androgen Therapy Overcomes the Time Delay in Initiation of Salvage Radiation Therapy and Rescues the Oncological Outcomes in Men with Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Post Hoc Analysis of the RTOG-9601 Trial Data

Background

It is unknown whether the addition of anti-androgen therapy (AAT) to late salvage radiation therapy (sRT) can lead to oncological outcomes equivalent to that of early sRT in men with recurrent prostate cancer (CaP) after surgery.

Methods

Data on 670 men who participated in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)-9601 trial and who experienced biochemical recurrence were extracted using the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) data archive platform. Patients were stratified into four treatment groups: early sRT (pre-sRT prostate-specific antigen [PSA] < 0.7 ng/mL) and late sRT (pre-sRT PSA ≥ 0.7 ng/mL) with/without concomitant AAT, based on cut-offs reported in the original trial. Time-varying Cox proportional hazards and Fine–Gray competing-risk regression analyses assessed the adjusted hazards of overall mortality, CaP-specific mortality, and metastasis among the four treatment groups.

Results

At 15-years (median follow-up of 14.7 years), for patients treated with early sRT, early sRT with AAT, late sRT, and late sRT with AAT, the overall mortality, CaP-specific mortality, and metastasis rates were 22.9, 22.8, 40.1, and 22.9% (log-rank p = 0.0039), 12.1, 3.9, 22.7, and 8.0% (Gray’s p = 0.0004), and 18.8, 14.6, 35.9, and 19.5% (Gray’s p = 0.0004), respectively. Time-varying multivariable adjusted analysis demonstrated increased hazards of overall mortality in patients receiving delayed sRT versus early sRT (hazards ratio [HR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–2.17); however, no difference remained after the addition of concomitant AAT to late sRT (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.55–1.32, referent early sRT). Likewise, the hazards of cancer-specific mortality and metastatic progression were worse for late sRT when compared with early sRT, but were no different after the addition of AAT to late sRT.

Conclusions

Poorer outcomes associated with late sRT in men with recurrent CaP may be rescued by delivery of concomitant AAT.

The cost impact of disease progression to metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Metastatic prostate cancer (PC) is associated with declining survival rates and increased health care expenditure. However, there are few studies quantifying these increased costs. OBJECTIVE: To estimate overall health care resource utilization and costs associated with progression to metastatic disease in Medicare or commercially insured patients with nonmetastatic castration-sensitive PC (nmCSPC) or previously undiagnosed PC. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we used data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and MarketScan Medicare Supplemental Databases. Included patients were aged 18 years or older, had 2 or more health care claims associated with a diagnosis of PC, and had a diagnosis of metastatic disease (index date) between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016. Patients with PC were identified at index as either progressing from a localized disease state (nmCSPC) without evidence of castration resistance (progressors) or de novo metastatic without a prior PC diagnosis. Unadjusted all-cause direct health care costs for the 2-year pre-index period and up to 2 years post-index were summarized. Metastasis-related incremental all-cause direct health care costs were estimated using regression modeling to adjust for patient baseline characteristics, follow-up duration, and possible selection bias. RESULTS: We identified 3,854 patients who met the criteria for CSPC at metastasis: 2,766 Medicare patients (mean age 78.8 ± 7.6 years) and 1,088 commercial patients (mean age 57.6 ± 4.3 years), with de novo patients accounting for 28.9% and 34.5% of the 2 analysis populations, respectively. Mean unadjusted total all-cause health care costs over the 24-month pre-index period among progressors were $52,661 (Medicare) and $43,111 (commercial); those among de novo patients were $39,756 (Medicare) and $22,090 (commercial). Mean unadjusted post-index costs for progressors were $100,331 (Medicare) and $127,374 (commercial) over a mean follow-up duration of 14.63 and 18.41 months, respectively, and $124,538 (Medicare) and $173,408 (commercial) over a mean follow-up duration of 14.14 and 17.29 months for patients with de novo disease. After multivariate adjustment, incremental cost increases due to metastasis in patients with CSPC pre-index were estimated at $104,051 (Medicare) and $93,334 (commercial), assuming data are available for 24 months post-index. Allowing for variation in the postindex observation period, estimates were $71,308 (Medicare) and $82,336 (commercial). Among de novo patients, cost increases due to metastasis were estimated at $180,932 (Medicare) and $215,397 (commercial), assuming all patients have data for 24 months postindex. Allowing for variable follow-up, estimates were $113,253 (Medicare) and $161,714 (commercial). CONCLUSIONS: Development of metastatic CSPC is associated with considerable costs over a 24-month follow-up period. Cost increases are greater for de novo patients than for those who progressed from localized disease. DISCLOSURES: Q.-D. Trinh received personal fees from Astellas, Bayer, and Janssen and grants from Intuitive Surgical. L. Passos Chaves, Q. Feng, J. Zhu, and T. Abbott are employees of Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. R. Sandin is an employee of, and holds stock in, Pfizer AB. This study was funded by Astellas Pharma Inc. (Northbrook, IL) and Pfizer Inc., the codevelopers of enzalutamide. Astellas Pharma Inc. was involved in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data, and decision to present these results.

Digital technologies in cancer care: a review from the clinician's perspective

Physicians are increasingly utilizing digital health technologies (DHT) such as smartphone applications, network-enabled wearable devices, web-based communication platforms, videoconferencing, chatbots, artificial intelligence and virtual reality to improve access to, and quality of, care. DHT aid in cancer screening, patient education, shared decision-making, promotion of positive health habits, symptom monitoring and intervention, patient-provider communication, provision of psychological support and delivery of effective survivorship care. This narrative review outlines how physicians may utilize digital health to improve or augment their delivery of cancer care. For the full potential of DHT to be realized, experts must develop appropriate solutions to issues surrounding the regulation, liability, quality, security, equity and reimbursement of DHT.

Cost-effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer in the UK

IMPORTANCE

The cost-effectiveness of different surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy remains a subject of debate. Emergence of recent critical clinical data and changes in surgical equipment costs due to their shared use by different clinical specialties necessitate an updated cost-effectiveness analysis in a centralized, largely government-funded health care system such as the UK National Health Service (NHS).

OBJECTIVE

To compare robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and laparoscopic-assisted radical prostatectomy (LRP) using contemporary data on clinical outcomes, costs, and surgical volumes in the UK.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This economic analysis used a Markov model developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of RARP, LRP, and ORP to treat localized prostate cancer. The model was constructed from the perspective of the UK NHS. The model simulated 65-year-old men who underwent radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer and were followed up for a 10-year period. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2020, to July 31, 2021.

EXPOSURES

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, LRP, and ORP.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs (direct medical costs and costs outside the NHS), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

Compared with LRP, RARP cost £1785 (US $2350) less and had 0.24 more QALYs gained; thus, RARP was a dominant option compared with LRP. Compared with ORP, RARP had 0.12 more QALYs gained but cost £526 (US $693) more during the 10-year time frame, resulting in an ICER of £4293 (US $5653)/QALY. Because the ICER was below the £30 000 (US $39 503) willingness-to-pay threshold, RARP was more cost-effective than ORP in the UK. The most sensitive variable influencing the cost-effectiveness of RARP was the lower risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR). Scenario analysis indicated RARP would remain more cost-effective than ORP as long as the BCR hazard ratios comparing RARP vs ORP were less than 0.99.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that in the UK, RARP has an ICER lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold and thus is likely a cost-effective surgical treatment option for patients with localized prostate cancer compared with ORP and LRP. The results were mainly driven by the lower risk of BCR for RARP. These findings may differ in other health care settings where different thresholds and costs may apply.

Are work relative value units correlated with operative duration of common surgical procedures?

OBJECTIVES

Work relative value units (wRVUs) quantify physician workload. In theory, higher wRVU assignments for procedures recognize an increase in complexity and time required to complete the procedure. The fairness of wRVU assignment is debated across specialties, with some surgeons arguing that reimbursement may be unfairly low for longer, more complex cases. For this reason, we sought to assess the correlation of wRVUs with operative time in commonly performed surgeries.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, selecting the 15 most performed surgical procedures across specialties in a 90-day global period, using Current Procedural Terminology codes.

METHODS

Calculation and comparison of mean operative time and mean wRVUs were performed for each of the 15 procedures. Cases with missing values for wRVUs or operative time and cases with an operative time of less than 15 minutes were excluded. The Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the strength of correlation between operative duration and wRVUs.

RESULTS

A total of 1,994,394 patients met criteria for analysis. The lowest mean wRVU was 7.78 (95% CI, 7.77-7.78) for inguinal hernia repair; the highest was 43.50 (95% CI, 43.37-43.60) for pancreatectomy. The shortest mean operative time was 51.0 (95% CI, 50.8-51.1) minutes for appendectomy; the longest was for pancreatectomy at 324.6 (95% CI, 323.2-326.0) minutes. The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.81.

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis, we found a strong correlation between operative duration and wRVU assignment. Thus, the reimbursement of physicians depending on wRVUs is fair for the most commonly performed surgical procedures across specialties.

Temporal changes in the screening, diagnosis and surgical treatment of genitourinary (GU) malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic

281

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a significant disruption in healthcare services including cancer screening and diagnosis. Delays in cancer screening and treatment may lead to increased mortality. We aimed to analyze changes in screening, diagnosis and surgical treatment of common GU malignancies in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We evaluated screening, novel diagnoses, and surgical management modalities of prostate cancer (PCa), urothelial carcinoma (UC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) within Massachusetts General Brigham, the largest healthcare system in the Northeastern United States, over four 3-month time periods during the pandemic (March 2020- March 2021). The percentage change in screening, diagnoses and management modalities during pandemic periods as compared to the immediate pre-pandemic period (December 2019-March 2020) was calculated as (Nperiod – Ncontrol)/Ncontrol. The difference in “predicted” versus “observed” diagnoses in each pandemic period was compared to the average of the four preceding 3-month periods (March 2019-March 2020) to account for seasonal variation. Results: The first pandemic peak (March-June 2020) was associated with a significant decline across screening, diagnosis and treatment, ranging from -15.7 to -64.8%, followed by a progressive recovery, ranging from -5.9 to +25.1% in the latest period (December 2020-March 2021) (Table). Although 725 diagnoses were “missed“ between March and June 2020 as compared to the previous 12 months, 971 diagnoses were “recovered” between June 2020 and March 2021. Conclusions: A substantial disruption in the screening, diagnosis and treatment of GU malignancies was observed early in the pandemic, followed by a progressive rebound and recovery. The highest declines were observed for PSA screening, and the lowest for cystectomy procedures, reflecting triaging of care based on severity during the pandemic.[Table: see text]

Combination of Tadalafil and Finasteride for the Treatment of Urinary Tract Symptoms Related to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Commercialization of the Prescribing Cascade

An oral capsule combining finasteride and tadalafil was recently approved in the USA for signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The authors argue that this new formulation has a limited role in the management of BPH and represents an avoidable prescribing cascade and low-value care. There is an armamentarium of medical and surgical alternatives that should be considered instead of a tadalafil and finasteride combination therapy given the problem of increasing polypharmacy and considerations for value-based care.

Comparison of the treatment of men with prostate cancer between the US and England: an international population-based study

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of prostate cancer varies between the United States (US) and England, however this has not been well characterised using recent data. We therefore investigated the extent of the differences between US and English patients with respect to initial treatment.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify men diagnosed with prostate cancer in the US and the treatments they received. We also used the National Prostate Cancer Audit (NPCA) database for the same purposes among men diagnosed with prostate cancer in England. Next, we used multivariable regression to estimate the adjusted risk ratio (aRR) of receiving radical local treatment for men with non-metastatic prostate cancer according to the country of diagnosis (US vs. England). The five-tiered Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG) classification was included as an interaction term.

RESULTS

We identified 109,697 patients from the SEER database, and 74,393 patients from the NPCA database, who were newly diagnosed with non-metastatic prostate cancer between April 1st 2014 and December 31st 2016 with sufficient information for risk stratification according to the CPG classification. Men in the US were more likely to receive radical local treatment across all prognostic groups compared to men in England (% radical treatment US vs. England, CPG1: 38.1% vs. 14.3% - aRR 2.57, 95% CI 2.47-2.68; CPG2: 68.6% vs. 52.6% - aRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.25-1.29; CPG3: 76.7% vs. 67.1% - aRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.10-1.13; CPG4: 82.6% vs. 72.4% - aRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.08-1.10; CPG5: 78.2% vs. 71.7% - aRR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.07) CONCLUSIONS: Treatment rates were higher in the US compared to England raising potential over-treatment concerns for low-risk disease (CPG1) in the US and under-treatment of clinically significant disease (CPG3-5) in England.