Stress, anxiety and depression levels in pregnancy: outpatient versus inpatient

OBJECTIVE

To compare stress, anxiety and depression levels among 3 groups of pregnant women: 1) low-risk outpatient (LRO), 2) high-risk outpatient (HRO), and 3) inpatient (IP).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study using validated instruments. Inclusion criteria were pregnancies 23-37 weeks and maternal age > 18 years. The primary outcome was mean/median scores of Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS). Secondary outcome was rate of abnormal scores.

RESULTS

Among 190 women approached, 180 (95%) participated, with 60 (33%) in each group. Mean PSS scores (range 0-40) significantly increased from LRO (12.0, standard deviation [SD] 7.8) to HRO (14.7, SD 7.9) to IP (15.6, SD 8.2); p = .04. Mean STAI scores (range 20-80) also significantly increased from LRO (32.0, SD 11.1) to HRO (35.8, SD 11.9) to IP (40.9, SD 13.1); p < .01. Abnormal anxiety (STAI ≥ 40) was present in 40% of women and significantly higher among IP compared to LRO (56% vs 25%; RR 2.24, 95% CI 1.36-3.67; aRR 2.24, 95% CI 1.34-3.74).

CONCLUSION

Stress and anxiety scores significantly differ in LRO, HRO, and IP women. While depression screening is common postpartum, screening for stress, anxiety and depression prenatally may be beneficial.

Association between route of delivery and maternal adverse outcomes in pregnancies complicated by preterm birth

INTRODUCTION

To determine the impact of route of delivery on maternal outcomes among individuals who deliver preterm (before 37 weeks).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using the U.S. vital statistics datasets on Period Linked Birth-Infant Death Data from 2014 to 2018. The study population was restricted to live births from women with non-anomalous singletons who delivered at 24-36 weeks of gestation. The main explanatory variable for this study was route of delivery, which was categorized as: (i) vaginal delivery, (ii) cesarean delivery with labor, and (iii) cesarean delivery without labor. The primary outcome was composite maternal adverse outcome, which encompassed any of the following: admission to the intensive care unit, maternal blood transfusion, uterine rupture, or unplanned hysterectomy. The results were presented as adjusted relative risk (aRR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Over the study period 1,440,510 live births met the inclusion criteria, and the overall composite maternal adverse outcome was 14.38 per 1,000 live births. After multivariable adjustment, compared to women who underwent a vaginal delivery, the risk of composite maternal adverse outcome was higher in women who had a cesarean delivery with labor (aRR 3.70; 95% CI 3.52-3.90) and those who had a cesarean delivery without labor (aRR 4.79; 95% CI 4.59-4.98).

CONCLUSION

With preterm birth, cesarean delivery without labor has higher rate of composite maternal morbidity than cesarean during labor or vaginal delivery.

Remdesivir use in pregnancy during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the composite maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant individuals with moderate, severe, or critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treated with remdesivir.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of the COVID in Pregnancy Registry in Houston, Texas. Women were included if they met the criteria of moderate, severe or critical COVID-19 illness. Composite adverse maternal outcome was defined as any of the following outcomes: placental abruption, pregnancy-related hypertension, chorioamnionitis, stroke, delivery with estimated blood loss >1000 mL, diagnosis of pulmonary embolism or deep venous thromboembolism, or maternal death. Composite adverse neonatal outcome was defined as any of the following: Apgar score ≤3 at 5 min, arterial cord pH <7.0, positive SAR-CoV-2 test, intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, stillbirth, or neonatal death. Comparative analyses between participants receiving remdesivir versus those not exposed were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 994 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. Of these, 95 (9.6%) met criteria for moderate, severe, or critical disease. Forty-one percent of these patients (n = 39) received remdesivir. Baseline demographic characteristics were not different between groups. No patients reported an allergic reaction with the administration of remdesivir; however, 16.7% of the patients had the medication discontinued due to transaminitis. Patients receiving the drug were more likely to have a longer illness duration on admission, more likely to require oxygen support on arrival and have a longer hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Remdesivir appears to be safe, well tolerated within our cohort with no cases of recorded adverse reaction.

Semiquantitative Assessment of Amniotic Fluid Among Individuals With and Without Diabetes Mellitus

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rate and severity of abnormal amniotic fluid volumes (oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios), as well as the distribution of amniotic fluid levels, in pregnancies with and without diabetes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of singleton nonanomalous pregnancies receiving an ultrasound examination (USE) in the third trimester. Pregnancies were categorized into those with and without diabetes and subcategorized by diabetes type. The primary outcomes were oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios. Polyhydramnios was also examined by severity. The association between maternal diabetes status and oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios was assessed using logistic regression. In addition, we computed gestational age-specific amniotic fluid index (AFI) and deepest vertical pocket (DVP) centiles for pregnancies with and without diabetes.

RESULTS

There were 60,226 USEs from 26,651 pregnancies that met inclusion criteria. There were 3992 (15.0%) pregnancies with diabetes and 22,659 (85.0%) without diabetes. Using AFI, the rate of polyhydramnios was 10.5 versus 3.8% (odds ratio [OR] 2.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.62-3.32) for pregnancies with versus without diabetes, respectively; using DVP, the rate of polyhydramnios was 13.9 versus 5.4% (OR 2.84; 95% CI 2.56-3.15). Rates of oligohydramnios were also increased in pregnancies with diabetes (3.3 versus 2.6%; OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.04-1.52). The AFI and DVP were significantly higher in the cohort with diabetes between 28 and 36 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Within our study population, pregnancies with diabetes had increased rates of oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios as well as increased gestational age-specific amniotic fluid volumes between 28 and 36 weeks. A higher prevalence of polyhydramnios was observed using DVP as compared to AFI; nevertheless, associations were similar using either method.

Planned versus Unplanned Delivery for Placenta Accreta Spectrum

OBJECTIVE

Women with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) having an unplanned delivery may have worse outcome compared with women with a planned delivery. The primary objective of this study was to compare severe maternal morbidity among women with PAS who had a planned scheduled delivery versus an unplanned delivery. Secondary objective was to compare neonatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study at two tertiary centers (January 2009 to June 2019) of all women who underwent a hysterectomy with a histologic proven PAS. Primary outcome was severe maternal morbidity which defined as any of the following: transfusion of ≥4 RBC units or ureter/bowel injury. Neonatal outcome was a composite neonatal morbidity defined as any of the following: Apgar score's < 5 at 5 minutes, mechanical ventilation, or respiratory distress syndrome. Maternal demographic, clinical, and sonographic characteristics were compared between the two groups (planned vs. unplanned). Descriptive statistics were used as appropriate, and a statistical significance was established if p-value was < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of 109 women who underwent cesarean hysterectomy for PAS, 41 (37.6%) had an unplanned delivery. There was no significant difference in the number of previous cesarean deliveries or ultrasound findings between the two groups. Women with an unplanned delivery were more likely to bleed during pregnancy than those that had a planned delivery (p = 0.04). Women with unplanned delivery had lower gestational age at delivery (30.3 vs. 33.8 weeks, p = 0.001) had a 75% higher rate of the primary outcome (63 vs. 36%, p = 0.007) and had a higher rate of intensive care unit admissions (39 vs. 17.7%, p = 0.01) compared with women with a planned delivery. The neonatal morbidity did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Since unplanned cesarean hysterectomy among women with PAS occurs in 40% and is associated with significantly higher morbidity, interventions are needed to mitigate the rate of adverse outcomes.

KEY POINTS

· Only 60% of women with PAS reached planned delivery at 34 weeks.. · PAS unplanned delivery is associated with high morbidity.. · Some women with PAS may need a scheduled earlier delivery..

Daily meditation program for anxiety in individuals admitted to the antepartum unit: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (MEDITATE)

BACKGROUND

Inpatient antepartum women have higher levels of anxiety than outpatient. Former randomized trials using mindful meditation programs to decrease maternal anxiety have conflicting results; some studies showed a considerable decrease in anxiety levels, whereas others showed no difference. A paucity of trials exist using mindful meditation for maternal anxiety in the inpatient antepartum population; most studies focus on the outpatient clinic population. Because of inpatient acuity and anxiety factors, we conducted a randomized trial to target this population.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare anxiety levels on day 4 of either routine care or routine care plus a twice-daily application-based mindful meditation program in women admitted to the antepartum unit.

STUDY DESIGN

In a multisite randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03737279), women admitted to the antepartum units were randomized to either routine care plus educational pamphlets (control arm) or routine care plus a twice-daily application-based mindful meditation program (intervention arm). The inclusion criteria were age of at least 18 years, gestational age of at least 23 weeks, planned inpatient care for >3 days from randomization, and care by our university physician team. The primary outcome was maternal state anxiety level (measured using the validated State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) on day 4 (randomization being day 1). The secondary outcomes included stress (measured using the Perceived Stress Scale) and depression (measured using the Edinburgh Depression Scale) on day 4, latency period from randomization to delivery, patient experience, number of meditation sessions, and total meditation time. A total of 56 women were needed for 90% power to detect a decrease in the primary outcome by 30% in the intervention group, compared with the control group. All women were observed using an intention-to-treat analysis. We compared the continuous variables using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test or t test and the categorical variables using the chi-squared test or the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

From March 4, 2019, to December 20, 2019, 412 women were screened for eligibility, 77 women (18.7%) were found eligible, and 56 women (72.7%) were randomized with 28 women in each group. Of note, 96.4% of women completed at least 1 meditation session, and 39.3% of women completed all meditation sessions. The mean score of the anxiety level using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory on day 4 was not significantly different (P=.24) between the control group (42.0±10.8) and meditation group (37.5±13.1). A decreased anxiety score from day 1 to day 4 was seen in both the control group and meditation group (-4.7 vs -9.4, respectively; P=.12). The rate of abnormal State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scores on day 4 was not significantly different between the control group and meditation group (62% vs 45%, respectively; P=.28). When asked about the experience with the research trial, 88.8% of women in the control group and 89.5% of women in the meditation group reported a positive experience.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the control group, a twice-daily application-based mindful meditation program for women admitted to the antepartum unit did not considerably decrease the anxiety score on day 4. However, >88% of women in both groups had a positive experience with the nonpharmacologic intervention.

The Association Between Number of Repeat Cesarean Deliveries and Adverse Outcomes among Low-Risk Pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To investigate maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes among low-risk pregnancies delivered at ≥ 37 weeks by repeat cesarean deliveries (RCD).

METHODS

A population-based, retrospective-study using the U.S. vital statistics datasets (2014-2018) evaluating low-risk pregnancies with a non-anomalous singleton non-laboring RCD from 37 to 41 weeks. People with hypertensive disorders or diabetes were excluded. Primary outcome was composite maternal adverse outcome (CMAO). Secondary outcome was composite neonatal adverse outcome (CNAO). Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate the association between number of RCD and outcomes (using adjusted relative risks [aRR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]).

RESULTS

Of the 19,623,195 live births, 1,747,610 (8.9%) met inclusion criteria and among them, 1,144,186 (65.5%) had 1 prior CD, 454,817 (26.0%) had 2 prior CD, 119,087 (6.8%) had 3 prior CD, and 29,520 (1.7%) had ≥4 prior CD. Compared with individuals with 1 prior CD, the risk of CMAO was higher in individuals with 2 (aRR=1.41, 95% CI= 1.34-1.48), 3 (1.96, 1.83-2.10), and ≥4 (2.98, 2.69-3.29) prior CD. An increased risk of CNAO was also found with an increasing number of RCD CONCLUSION: Among low-risk pregnancies undergoing RCD, increasing number of prior CD was associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes.

Detection of Fetal Anomalies by Remotely Directed and Interpreted Ultrasound (Teleultrasound): A Randomized Noninferiority Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy and reliability of remotely directed and interpreted ultrasound (teleultrasound) as compared with standard in-person ultrasound for the detection of fetal anomalies, and to determine participants' satisfaction with teleultrasound.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-center, randomized (1:1) noninferiority study. Individuals referred to the maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) ultrasound clinic were randomized to standard in-person ultrasound and counseling or teleultrasound and telemedicine counseling. The primary outcome was major fetal anomaly detection rate (sensitivity). All ultrasounds were performed by registered diagnostic medical sonographers and interpretations were done by a group of five MFM physicians. After teleultrasound was completed, the teleultrasound patients filled out a satisfaction survey using a Likert scale. Newborn data were obtained from the newborn record and statewide birth defect databases.

RESULTS

Of 300 individuals randomized in each group, 294 were analyzed in the remotely interpreted teleultrasound group and 291 were analyzed in the in-person ultrasound group. The sensitivity of sonographic detection of 28 anomalies was 82.14% in the control group and of 20 anomalies in the telemedicine group, it was 85.0%. The observed difference in sensitivity was 0.0286, much smaller than the proposed noninferiority limit of 0.05. Specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy were more than 94% for both groups. Patient satisfaction was more than 95% on all measures, and there were no significant differences in patient satisfaction based on maternal characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Teleultrasound is not inferior to standard in-person ultrasound for the detection of fetal anomalies. Teleultrasound was uniformly well received by patients, regardless of demographics. These key findings support the continued expansion of telemedicine services.

KEY POINTS

· For detection of major anomalies, teleultrasound is comparable to standard ultrasound.. · Teleultrasound was well accepted by patients.. · Teleultrasound use should be expanded..

Enhanced recovery after scheduled cesarean delivery: a prospective pre-post intervention study

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether an early recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway after scheduled cesarean delivery was associated with a reduction in postoperative length of stay compared with standard perioperative care.

METHODS

This was a prospective pre- and post-intervention study. Women were included if they were between 18 and 45 years of age and delivered a singleton, term, non-anomalous fetus via scheduled cesarean delivery by a provider within an academic practice. The ERAS pathway consisted of 23 evidence-based components regarding preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care. The primary outcome was the rate of postoperative length of stay of 3 or more days. Secondary outcomes included total postoperative narcotic use, postoperative complications, 30-day hospital readmission rates, and quality of recovery questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

A total of 116 women were included. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the pre- and post-implementation groups in the post-implementation group, surgery time was longer (78.3 ± 27.8 vs 59.1 ± 19.2 min, p < .001) and blood loss volume was higher (910.3 ± 405.1 vs 729.1 ± 202.0, p = .003), compared to pre-implementation group. An ERAS pathway was not associated in a significant reduction in postoperative length of stay of 3 or more days (70.7% vs 75.9%, p = .529). It was also not significantly associated with a difference in postoperative narcotic use, maximum pain score, transfusion, postoperative complications or hospital readmission rates.

CONCLUSION

An early recovery after surgery pathway after scheduled cesarean delivery was not associated with a reduction in postoperative length of stay or narcotic use, though the recovery scores were better after implementation.

Prostaglandins for induction in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction

BACKGROUND

The data on safety of prostaglandin agents for induction of pregnancies with fetal growth restriction is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rates of adverse outcomes among pregnancies with fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with and without prostaglandins STUDY DESIGN: We performed a propensity-score-based secondary analysis of the Consortium on Safe Labor database. We included term, singleton, and nonanomalous pregnancies with fetal growth restriction (estimated fetal weight <10th percentile for gestational age). We excluded previous cesarean deliveries. The primary exposure was induction using prostaglandins (prostaglandin E₁ or prostaglandin E₂) compared with other methods. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes. The secondary outcomes included all cesarean deliveries and cesarean deliveries for nonreassuring fetal heart tracings. A subgroup analysis comparing the type of prostaglandin was planned a priori. The results are expressed as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Of 756 (0.3%) inductions, 212 (28%) used prostaglandins (108 prostaglandin E₁, 94 prostaglandin E₂), and 553 (72%) used nonprostaglandin methods, including oxytocin (348, 63%), amniotomy (211, 38%), and/or mechanical dilation (9, 1%). There were no differences in the composite of adverse neonatal outcomes between the prostaglandin (10.4%) and the nonprostaglandin group (6.7%), adjusted odds ratio, 1.39 (0.64-3.03). The rate of cesarean delivery was higher in the inductions that received prostaglandins than those that did not (25.5% vs 14.8%, adjusted odds ratio, 1.80; 1.07-3.02). The rate of cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart tracings was higher for those that received prostaglandins than those that did not (16.0% vs 8.7%, adjusted odds ratio, 2.37; 1.28-4.41). When prostaglandin E₁ and prostaglandin E₂ were examined independently, there were similar increases in the composite of adverse neonatal outcomes and cesarean delivery rates for both prostaglandin E₁ and prostaglandin E₂ compared with nonprostaglandin controls.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in the composite of adverse neonatal outcomes when prostaglandins were used for induction in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction compared with other methods. However, there was a higher rate of cesarean delivery and cesarean delivery indicated for nonreassuring fetal heart tracings when prostaglandins (both prostaglandin E₁ and prostaglandin E₂) were used, compared with nonprostaglandin methods.

Maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in individuals with a prior cesarean birth who undergo induction at 39 weeks

OBJECTIVE

To compare the maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes among individuals with one or two prior cesarean deliveries who are induced at 39 weeks gestational age versus those that are expectantly managed.

METHODS

This was a population-based cross-sectional study using U.S. National Vital Statistics 2014-2018 period linked birth and infant death data. Cohorts were individuals with one or two prior cesarean deliveries who were induced at 39.0 to 39.6 weeks gestation or underwent delivery from 40.0 to 41.6 weeks gestational age from either spontaneous labor or induction. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal adverse outcomes: admission to the intensive care unit, transfusion, uterine rupture, or unplanned hysterectomy. The secondary outcome was a composite of neonatal adverse outcomes, including: 5-minute Apgar score <5, assisted ventilation for >6 h, neonatal seizures, or neonatal mortality (death within 27 days of birth).

RESULTS

Of 263,489 women who met the inclusion criteria 21,951 (8.3%) underwent induction at 39 weeks. The composite maternal adverse outcome was significantly higher in women who delivered at 40-41 weeks gestation when compared to the 39 week gestation induction of labor cohort (8.1 versus 9.4 per 1,000 births; aRR 1.18; 95% CI 1.01-1.39). The overall rate of composite neonatal adverse outcome was 10.4 per 1,000 live births. The composite neonatal adverse outcome was also significantly elevated among deliveries at 40-41 weeks gestation as well (8.6 vs. 10.8 per 1,000 live births; aRR 1.31; 95%CI 1.12-1.53).

CONCLUSION

In women undergoing trial of labor after cesarean, induction of labor at 39 weeks gestation was associated with fewer maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes when compared to delivery at 40-41 weeks gestation.

Interventions to decrease complications after shoulder dystocia: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes associated with the implementation of simulation exercises to reduce the sequela of shoulder dystocia.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature database, and Scopus) were initially queried in June 2020 and updated in November 2020. The following 3 concepts were introduced and refined using the controlled vocabulary of the database: vaginal birth, shoulder dystocia, and simulation training. There were no limitations to the year of publication as part of the search strategy.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included all studies that reported on the frequency of shoulder dystocia and the associated complications before and after the implementation of interventional exercises to improve outcomes.

METHODS

Two authors independently assessed the abstracts and full-text articles of all studies for eligibility and evaluated the quality of the included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Any inconsistencies related to study evaluation or data extraction were resolved by a third author. The coprimary outcomes of this systematic review and meta-analysis were neonatal brachial plexus palsy diagnosed following deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia and persistence of brachial palsy at 12 months or later. The secondary outcomes were the frequency of shoulder dystocia and cesarean delivery. Study effects were combined using a Bayesian meta-analysis and were reported as risk ratios and 95% credible intervals (Crs).

RESULTS

Of the 372 articles reviewed, 16 publications, which included 428,552 deliveries with 217,713 (50.8%) deliveries during the preintervention and 210,839 (49.2%) deliveries during the postinterventional period, were included in the meta-analysis. The incidence of neonatal brachial plexus palsy after shoulder dystocia decreased from 12.1% to 5.7% (risk ratio, 0.37; 95% Cr, 0.26-0.57; probability of reduction 100%). The overall proportion of neonatal brachial plexus palsy decreased, but with less precision, from 0.3% to 0.1% (risk ratio, 0.53; 95% Cr, 0.21-1.26; probability of reduction 94%). Two studies followed newborns with brachial plexus palsy for at least 12 months. One study that reported on persistent neonatal brachial plexus palsy at 12 months among 1148 shoulder dystocia cases noted a reduction in persistent neonatal brachial plexus palsy from 1.9% to 0.2% of shoulder dystocia cases (risk ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.49). In contrast, the study that reported on persistent neonatal brachial plexus palsy at 12 months for all deliveries noted that it did not change significantly, namely from 0.3 to 0.2 per 1000 births (risk ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-1.90). Following the implementation of shoulder dystocia interventional exercises, the diagnosis of shoulder dystocia increased significantly from 1.2% to 1.7% of vaginal deliveries (risk ratio, 1.39; 95% Cr, 1.19-1.65; probability of increase 100%). Compared with the preimplementation period, the cesarean delivery rate increased postimplementation from 21.2% to 25.9% (risk ratio, 1.22; 95% Cr, 0.93-1.59; probability of increase 93%). We created an online tool (https://ccrebm-bell.shinyapps.io/sdmeta/) that permits calculation of the absolute risk reduction and absolute risk increase attributable to the intervention vis-à-vis the incidence of shoulder dystocia, neonatal brachial plexus palsy, and cesarean deliveries.

CONCLUSION

Introduction of shoulder dystocia interventional exercises decreased the rate of neonatal brachial plexus palsy per shoulder dystocia case; the data on persistence of neonatal brachial plexus palsy beyond 12 months is limited and contradictory. Implementation of the interventions was associated with an increase in the diagnosis of shoulder dystocia and rate of cesarean deliveries.

Number and quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics published in the top general medical and obstetrics and gynecology journals

BACKGROUND

There has been an increasing number of randomized controlled trials published in obstetrics and maternal-fetal medicine to reduce biases of treatment effect and to provide insights on the cause-effect of the relationship between treatment and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify obstetrical randomized controlled trials published in top weekly general medical journals and monthly obstetrics and gynecology journals, to assess their quality in reporting and identify factors associated with publication in different journals.

STUDY DESIGN

The 4 weekly medical journals with the highest 2019 impact factor (New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, The Journal of the American Medical Association, and British Medical Journal), the top 4 monthly obstetrics and gynecology journals with obstetrics-related research (American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, Obstetrics & Gynecology, and the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology), and the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine were searched for obstetrical randomized controlled trials in the years 2018 to 2020. The primary outcome was the number of obstetrical randomized controlled trials published in the obstetrics and gynecology journals vs the weekly medical journals and the percentage of trials published, overall and per journal. The secondary outcomes included the proportion of positive vs negative trials overall and per journal and the assessment of the study characteristics of published trials, including quality assessment criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 4024 original research articles published in the 9 journals during the 3-year study period, 1221 (30.3%) were randomized controlled trials, with 137 (11.2%) randomized controlled trials being in obstetrics (46 in 2018, 47 in 2019, and 44 studies in 2020). Furthermore, 33 (24.1%) were published in weekly medical journals, and 104 (75.9%) were published in obstetrics and gynecology journals. The percentage of obstetrical randomized controlled trials published ranged from 1.5% to 9.6% per journal. Overall, 34.3% of obstetrical trials were statistically significant or "positive" for the primary outcome. Notably, 24.8% of the trials were retrospectively registered after the enrollment of the first study patient. Trials published in the 4 weekly medical journals enrolled significantly more patients (1801 vs 180; P<.001), received more often funding from the federal government (78.8% vs 35.6%; P<.001), and were more likely to be multicenter (90.9% vs 42.3%; P<.001), non-United States based (69.7% vs 49.0%; P=.03), and double blinded (45.5% vs 18.3%; P=.003) than trials published in the obstetrics and gynecology journals. There was no difference in study type (noninferiority vs superiority) and trial quality characteristics, including pretrial registration, ethics approval statement, informed consent statement, and adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines statement between studies published in weekly medical journals and studies published in obstetrics and gynecology journals.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 45 trials in obstetrics are being published every year in the highest impact journals, with one-fourth being in the weekly medical journals and the remainder in the obstetrics and gynecology journals. Only about a third of published obstetrical trials are positive. Trials published in weekly medical journals are larger, more likely to be funded by the government, multicenter, international, and double blinded. Quality metrics are similar between weekly medical journals and obstetrics and gynecology journals.

Maternal Sepsis: A Review of National and International Guidelines

OBJECTIVE

 Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome caused by the body's response to infection. The Global Maternal Sepsis Study (GLOSS) suggests sepsis plays a larger role in maternal morbidity and mortality than previously thought. We therefore sought to compare national and international guidelines for maternal sepsis to determine their consistency with each other and the Third International Consensus for Sepsis and Septic Shock (SEPSIS-3).

STUDY DESIGN

 Using Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, Google Scholar, and organization Web sites, we identified seven guidelines on maternal sepsis in the English language-The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Physicians of Ireland Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and World Health Organization. Guidelines were reviewed to ascertain the commonality and variation, if any, in definitions of maternal sepsis, tools and criteria utilized for diagnosis, obstetric warning systems used, as well as evaluation and management of maternal sepsis. These variables were also compared with SEPSIS-3.

RESULTS

 All guidelines provided definitions consistent with a version of the SEPSIS, although the specific version utilized were varied. Clinical variables and tools employed for diagnosis of maternal sepsis were also varied. Evaluation and management of maternal sepsis and septic shock were similar.

CONCLUSION

 In conclusion, national and international maternal sepsis guidelines were incongruent with each other and SEPSIS-3 in diagnostic criteria and tools but similar in evaluation and management recommendations.

KEY POINTS

· Definitions for maternal sepsis and septic shock are varied.. · Maternal sepsis guidelines differ in proposed criteria and tools.. · Maternal sepsis guidelines have similar management recommendations..

Association between time of delivery and composite adverse outcomes in pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders

INTRODUCTION

A potential manner to lower the morbidity with the hypertensive disoreders of pregancy is to explore the time of day of delivery.

OBJECTIVE

To compare composite neonatal adverse outcomes among term women with hypertensive disorders.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study used the U.S. vital statistics dataset from 2013 to 2017. Time of delivery was categorized into three shifts. The primary outcome was composite neonatal adverse outcome..

RESULTS

Compared to neonates delivered at the first shift, the risk of composite neonatal adverse outcome was higher at the third shift (aRR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.13-1.25).

CONCLUSION

the risk of composite neonatal adverse outcome is higher if the delivery occurs at the third (23:00-7:00) shift.

Amniotic Fluid Volume Assessment: Eight Lessons Learned

Actual AFV can be determined by a dye-dilution technique or be directly measured at cesarean. This allows investigators to correlate estimated and actual AFVs. Lessons learned by assessing the relationship of estimated to actual AFVs. 1) Ultrasound estimates normal actual AFVs well, but abnormal AFVs poorly. 2) Quantile regression is a better statistical methodology to create a normal AFV curve across pregnancy. 3) There is no difference in the accuracy of the subjective (visualization without measurements) compared with the objective (visualization with measurements) technique in identifying normal and abnormal AFVs. 4) Color Doppler use leads to the over-diagnosis of oligohydramnios. 5) Intravenous hydration increases actual AFVs. 6) The estimation of AFV can be done with the transducer held perpendicular to the floor or perpendicular to the uterine contour. 7) The single deepest pocket should be used for identifying low AFVs. 8) The AFI should be used for identifying high AFVs.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Nulliparous Participants Undergoing Labor Induction by Cervical Ripening Method

OBJECTIVE

 This study aimed to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by method of cervical ripening for labor induction among low-risk nulliparous individuals.

STUDY DESIGN

 This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial of labor induction at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous participants. Participants undergoing cervical ripening for labor induction in either group were included. Participants were excluded for preripening membrane rupture, abruption, chorioamnionitis, fetal demise, or cervical dilation ≥3.5 cm. Cervical ripening was defined by the initial method used: prostaglandin only (PGE; referent), Foley with concurrent prostaglandin (Foley-PGE), Foley only (Foley), and Foley with concurrent oxytocin (Foley-oxytocin). Coprimary outcomes were adverse maternal and neonatal composites. Secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery and length of labor and delivery (L&D) stay. Multivariable analysis was used to adjust for patient characteristics.

RESULTS

 Of 6,106 participants included in the trial, 2,376 (38.9%) met criteria for this analysis. Of these, 1,247 (52.4%) had cervical ripening with PGE, 290 (12.2%) had Foley-PGE, 385 (16.2%) had Foley, and 454 (19.1%) had Foley-oxytocin. The maternal composite outcome was similar among participants who received Foley-PGE (24.1%, adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.52), Foley (21.3%, aRR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.92-1.45), or Foley-oxytocin (19.4%, aRR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.83-1.29), compared with PGE (19.7%). The neonatal composite outcome was less frequent in participants who received the Foley-PGE (2.4%, aRR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.75) or Foley (3.6%, aRR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.89) but did not reach statistical significance for participants who received Foley-oxytocin (4.6%, aRR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.40-1.01) compared with PGE only (6.8%). Participants who received Foley-PGE or Foley-oxytocin had a shorter L&D stay (adjusted mean difference = -1.97 hours, 95% CI: -3.45 to -0.49 and -5.92 hours, 95% CI: -7.07 to -4.77, respectively), compared with PGE.

CONCLUSION

 In term low-risk nulliparous participants, Foley alone or concurrent with PGE is associated with a lower risk of adverse neonatal outcomes than with PGE alone. Length of L&D stay was the shortest with concurrent Foley-oxytocin.

KEY POINTS

· Adverse maternal outcomes are similar among different methods of cervical ripening in low-risk women.. · Adverse neonatal outcomes are less frequent with use of Foley alone or in combination with PGE.. · The use of Foley alone, or in combination with other agents, appears to be beneficial..