Abstract OT1-1-17: LUX-Breast 2: Phase II, open-label study of oral afatinib in HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) who progressed on prior trastuzumab and/or lapatinib*

Background: Management of HER2-overexpressing MBC has improved over the past decade. However, pts still develop resistance to currently available HER2-targeted therapies and novel effective treatments are increasingly required as dual targeted combinations are given in early treatment lines already. Current therapies focus on targeting HER2 and do not inhibit all relevant ErbB Family dimers. Afatinib is an oral, irreversible ErbB Family Blocker that inhibits signaling through activated EGFR (ErbB1), HER2 (ErbB2) and ErbB4 receptors and transphosphorylation of ErbB3. Preclinical studies have demonstrated efficacy in trastuzumab-sensitive, and trastuzumab-resistant human BC xenograft models dependent on ErbB signaling. Efficacy of afatinib in a trastuzumab-resistant SUM190 xenograft model has been shown to be increased by addition of intravenous (i.v.) vinorelbine. Afatinib monotherapy has shown promising clinical benefit in 46% of HER2-overexpressing MBC pts who progressed on prior trastuzumab, with 10% of pts achieving a partial response.1

Methods: This open-label Phase II trial (NCT01271725) investigates efficacy and safety of afatinib alone (40 mg/day) followed by afatinib ‘beyond progression’ in combination with chemotherapy in 120 pts with HER2-overexpressing MBC, who progressed on prior neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant trastuzumab and/or lapatinib. Pts who progress on afatinib monotherapy receive afatinib + either weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 or vinorelbine i.v. 25 mg/m2. Eligible pts have confirmed HER2-overexpressing BC, Stage IV disease measurable by RECIST 1.1, progressed on trastuzumab and/or lapatinib therapy in either neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting, are eligible for retreatment with paclitaxel (i.e. should not have been pretreated with paclitaxel within the past 12 months), or are eligible for treatment with vinorelbine (i.e. should not have been pretreated with vinorelbine). Exclusion criteria include inadequate cardiac, renal, hepatic and hematological function, pre-existing gastrointestinal dysfunction, rapidly progressing visceral MBC, interstitial lung disease, and active brain metastases. The primary endpoint is objective response (OR) and secondary endpoints include best overall response, duration of OR, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. PFS and safety will be assessed separately for afatinib mono- and combination therapy. An early stopping rule was deployed to minimize the number of pts treated should afatinib be ineffective; once 20 evaluable pts (according to RECIST 1.1) completed at least two courses of afatinib (or progressed during the first course), a meeting was held to evaluate the objective tumor response rate and to decide whether to proceed with the trial or stop due to futility. If at least one unconfirmed OR had been witnessed from all available information at the time, then the trial was to continue to full accrual. This early stopping rule for futility has been passed and the trial will continue to full accrual. Pt enrollment began in May 2011 in ∼40 sites and five countries.

1. Lin NU, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2003-y.

*Updated abstract from ASCO 2012.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-1-17.

Interactions in the aetiology, presentation and management of synchronous and metachronous adenocarcinoma of the prostate and rectum

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate and rectum are common male pelvic cancers and may present synchronously or metachronously and, due to their anatomic proximity. The treatment of rectal or prostate cancer (in particular surgery and/or radiotherapy) may alter the presentation, incidence and management should a metachronous tumour develop. This review focuses on the interaction between prostatic and rectal cancer diagnosis and management. We have restricted the scope of this large topic to general considerations, management of rectal cancer after prostate cancer treatment and vice versa, management of synchronous disease and cancer follow-up issues.

Adjuvant therapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin in stage II and elderly patients (between ages 70 and 75 years) with colon cancer: subgroup analyses of the Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer trial

PURPOSE

Oxaliplatin combined with fluoropyrimidine improves survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. However, adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin is controversial in stage II and elderly patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed subgroup analyses of stage II and elderly patients randomly assigned fluorouracil with leucovorin (FL) ± oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) in the Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer study. Comorbidities, severe adverse events, second cancers, management of relapse and death as a result of causes than other colon cancer were studied.

RESULTS

Two thousand two hundred forty-six patients were enrolled. Overall, 899 patients had stage II disease, including 330 low-risk and 569 high-risk patients. A total of 315 patients were ages 70 to 75 years. For stage II patients, the hazard ratio (HR) for comparing FOLFOX4 with FL was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.62 to 01.14) for disease-free survival (DFS), 0.70 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99) for time to recurrence (TTR), and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.41) for overall survival (OS). There was no interaction between treatment and stage or age. Low-risk stage II patients did not benefit from oxaliplatin. In high-risk stage II patients, the HR comparing FOLFOX4 with FL was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.51 to 1.01) for DFS, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.92) for TTR, and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.36) for OS. In elderly patients, the HR comparing FOLFOX4 with FL was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.35) for DFS, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.47 to 1.11) for TTR, and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.65) for OS.

CONCLUSION

The results of these subset analyses show no statistically significant benefit (OS and DFS) for the addition of oxaliplatin to FL as adjuvant treatment for either stage II and elderly patients.

Prospective and working memory decline as a result of impaired sleep and/or impared blood glucose in breast cancer patients during chemotherapy treatment

TPS9148

Background: Breast cancer patients might develop impaired sleep patterns during chemotherapy, and impaired cognitive function has been associated with sleep patterns disruption. It has been suggested that sleepiness (sleep tendency) in cancer patients is prevalent and causes distress in the patient’s quality of life, that and their cognitive abilities are also affected. Furthermore, increased blood glucose levels among women undergoing chemotherapy may contrubute to memory deficits in breast cancer patients. It is proposed that Prospective and Working Memory are being affected by the disturbance of these biological factors over the course of chemotherapy. Methods: Ninety participants will be invited to take part in the study. Thirty will be breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy treatment, thirty breast cancer patients receiving treatment other than chemotheray, and thirty healthy controls. Measures of sleep and sleepiness, will be administered at 4 testing sessions during a 9-month period, along with a neuropsychological battery. Additionally, blood samples will be analysed. Eight of planned 60 cancer patients have been enrolled, and four of them have completed the second testing session. For the assessment of sleep/wake activity, participants will be required to wear a sleeping monitor (sensewear armband) for 7 days. Pupil dilatation to observe sleepiness will be meassured by using a Pupillometry developed at Poole hospital in the UK. Prospective Memory will be assessed using CAMPROMT test to analyse if this is a more sensitive measure for mild cognitive impairment. Discussion: Impairment on variables such as sleep, sleepiness and glucose have not been studied within the context of Chemo-Brain on breast cancer patients.Therefore we want to observe whether impaired sleep and sleepiness, and impaired glucose levels are at the core of Prospective and Working Memory decline in Chemo-Brain patients in order to find a cause-and-effect relationship as a consequence of chemotherapy.

LUX-breast 2: Phase II, open-label study of oral afatinib in HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) who progressed on prior trastuzumab (T) and/or lapatanib (L)

TPS651

Background: Management of HER2-overexpressing MBC has improved over the past decade. However, pts still develop resistance to currently available HER2-targeted therapies and novel effective treatments are increasingly required as dual targeted combinations are given in early treatment lines already. Current therapies focus on targeting HER2 and do not inhibit all relevant ErbB Family dimers. Afatinib is an oral, irreversible ErbB Family Blocker that inhibits signaling through activated EGFR (ErbB1), HER2 (ErbB2) and ErbB4 receptors and transphosphorylation of ErbB3. Preclinical studies have demonstrated efficacy in T-sensitive and T-resistant human BC xenograft models dependent on ErbB signaling. Efficacy of afatinib in a T-resistant SUM 190 xenograft model has been shown to be increased by addition of IV vinorelbine (V). Afatinib monotherapy has shown promising clinical benefit in 46% of HER2-overexpressing MBC pts who progressed on prior T, with 10% of pts achieving PR. Methods: This open-label Phase II trial (NCT01271725) investigates efficacy and safety of afatinib alone (40 mg/d) followed by afatinib ‘beyond progression’ plus chemotherapy in 120 pts with HER2-overexpressing MBC, who progressed on prior neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant T and/or L. Pts who progress on afatinib monotherapy receive afatinib plus either weekly paclitaxel (P) 80 mg/m2 or V 25 mg/m2. Eligible pts have confirmed HER2-overexpressing BC, stage IV disease measurable by RECIST 1.1, progressed on T and/or L therapy in either neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting, are eligible for retreatment with P or V and should not have been pretreated with P (≤12 months) or V, respectively. Exclusion criteria: inadequate cardiac, renal, hepatic and hematological function, pre-existing gastrointestinal dysfunction, rapidly progressing visceral disease, ILD and active brain metastases. The primary endpoint is objective response (OR) and secondary endpoints include best overall response, duration of OR and PFS; safety will be assessed separately for afatinib mono- and combination therapy. Patient enrollment began in May 2011 in ~35 sites and 5 countries.

A phase II study of afatinib (BIBW 2992), an irreversible ErbB family blocker, in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer progressing after trastuzumab

Afatinib is an oral, ErbB family blocker, which covalently binds and irreversibly blocks all kinase-competent ErbB family members. This phase II, open-label, single-arm study explored afatinib activity in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer patients progressing after trastuzumab treatment. Patients had stage IIIB/IV HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, with progression following trastuzumab or trastuzumab intolerance and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2. Patients received 50 mg afatinib once-daily until disease progression. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0), with tumor assessments every 8 weeks. Forty-one patients were treated. Patients had received a median of three prior chemotherapy lines (range, 0–15) and 68.3% had received trastuzumab for >1 year. Four patients (10% of 41 treated; 11% of evaluable patients) had partial response. Fifteen patients (37% of 41) had stable disease as best response and 19 (46% of 41) achieved clinical benefit. Median progression-free survival was 15.1 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1–16.7); median overall survival was 61.0 weeks (95% CI: 56.7–not evaluable). Most frequent common terminology criteria for adverse events grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (24.4%) and rash (9.8%). Afatinib monotherapy was associated with promising clinical activity in extensively pretreated HER2-positive breast cancer patients who had progressed following trastuzumab treatment.

Intermittent versus continuous oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial

BACKGROUND

When cure is impossible, cancer treatment should focus on both length and quality of life. Maximisation of time without toxic effects could be one effective strategy to achieve both of these goals. The COIN trial assessed preplanned treatment holidays in advanced colorectal cancer to achieve this aim.

METHODS

COIN was a randomised controlled trial in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer. Patients received either continuous oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine combination (arm A), continuous chemotherapy plus cetuximab (arm B), or intermittent (arm C) chemotherapy. In arms A and B, treatment continued until development of progressive disease, cumulative toxic effects, or the patient chose to stop. In arm C, patients who had not progressed at their 12-week scan started a chemotherapy-free interval until evidence of disease progression, when the same treatment was restarted. Randomisation was done centrally (via telephone) by the MRC Clinical Trials Unit using minimisation. Treatment allocation was not masked. The comparison of arms A and B is described in a companion paper. Here, we compare arms A and C, with the primary objective of establishing whether overall survival on intermittent therapy was non-inferior to that on continuous therapy, with a predefined non-inferiority boundary of 1.162. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analyses were done. This trial is registered, ISRCTN27286448.

FINDINGS

1630 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (815 to continuous and 815 to intermittent therapy). Median survival in the ITT population (n=815 in both groups) was 15.8 months (IQR 9.4-26.1) in arm A and 14.4 months (8.0-24.7) in arm C (hazard ratio [HR] 1.084, 80% CI 1.008-1.165). In the per-protocol population (arm A, n=467; arm C, n=511), median survival was 19.6 months (13.0-28.1) in arm A and 18.0 months (12.1-29.3) in arm C (HR 1.087, 0.986-1.198). The upper limits of CIs for HRs in both analyses were greater than the predefined non-inferiority boundary. Preplanned subgroup analyses in the per-protocol population showed that a raised baseline platelet count, defined as 400,000 per μL or higher (271 [28%] of 978 patients), was associated with poor survival with intermittent chemotherapy: the HR for comparison of arm C and arm A in patients with a normal platelet count was 0.96 (95% CI 0.80-1.15, p=0.66), versus 1.54 (1.17-2.03, p=0.0018) in patients with a raised platelet count (p=0.0027 for interaction). In the per-protocol population, more patients on continuous than on intermittent treatment had grade 3 or worse haematological toxic effects (72 [15%] vs 60 [12%]), whereas nausea and vomiting were more common on intermittent treatment (11 [2%] vs 43 [8%]). Grade 3 or worse peripheral neuropathy (126 [27%] vs 25 [5%]) and hand-foot syndrome (21 [4%] vs 15 [3%]) were more frequent on continuous than on intermittent treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Although this trial did not show non-inferiority of intermittent compared with continuous chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer in terms of overall survival, chemotherapy-free intervals remain a treatment option for some patients with advanced colorectal cancer, offering reduced time on chemotherapy, reduced cumulative toxic effects, and improved quality of life. Subgroup analyses suggest that patients with normal baseline platelet counts could gain the benefits of intermittent chemotherapy without detriment in survival, whereas those with raised baseline platelet counts have impaired survival and quality of life with intermittent chemotherapy and should not receive a treatment break.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK.

Graphic and haptic simulation system for virtual laparoscopic rectum surgery

BACKGROUND

Medical simulators with vision and haptic feedback techniques offer a cost-effective and efficient alternative to the traditional medical trainings. They have been used to train doctors in many specialties of medicine, allowing tasks to be practised in a safe and repetitive manner. This paper describes a virtual-reality (VR) system which will help to influence surgeons' learning curves in the technically challenging field of laparoscopic surgery of the rectum.

METHODS

Data from MRI of the rectum and real operation videos are used to construct the virtual models. A haptic force filter based on radial basis functions is designed to offer realistic and smooth force feedback. To handle collision detection efficiently, a hybrid model is presented to compute the deformation of intestines. Finally, a real-time cutting technique based on mesh is employed to represent the incision operation.

RESULTS

Despite numerous research efforts, fast and realistic solutions of soft tissues with large deformation, such as intestines, prove extremely challenging. This paper introduces our latest contribution to this endeavour. With this system, the user can haptically operate with the virtual rectum and simultaneously watch the soft tissue deformation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our system has been tested by colorectal surgeons who believe that the simulated tactile and visual feedbacks are realistic. It could replace the traditional training process and effectively transfer surgical skills to novices.

A multicentre study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab as perioperative treatment of patients with poor-risk colorectal liver-only metastases not selected for upfront resection

BACKGROUND

Perioperative chemotherapy improves outcome in resectable colorectal liver-only metastasis (CLM). This study aimed to evaluate perioperative CAPOX (capecitabine-oxaliplatin) plus bevacizumab in patients with poor-risk CLM not selected for upfront resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Poor-risk CLM was defined as follows: more than four metastases, diameter >5 cm, R0 resection unlikely, inadequate viable liver function if undergoing upfront resection, inability to retain liver vascular supply, or synchronous colorectal primary presentation. Patients underwent baseline computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or positron emission tomography (PET) for staging and received neoadjuvant CAPOX plus bevacizumab, with resectability assessed every four cycles. Primary end point was radiological objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were recruited, of which 91% underwent PET to ensure metastases confined to liver. Following neoadjuvant CAPOX plus bevacizumab, the ORR was 78% (95% confidence interval 63% to 89%). This allowed 12 of 30 (40%) patients with initial nonsynchronous unresectable CLM to be converted to resectability. In addition, 10 of 15 (67%) patients with synchronous resectable CLM underwent liver resection, with four additional patients being observed alone due to excellent response to neoadjuvant therapy. No grade 3-4 perioperative complications were seen.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant CAPOX plus bevacizumab resulted in a high response rate for patients with CLMs with poor-risk features not selected for upfront resection and converted 40% of patients to resectability.

Renal function changes and NHS resource use in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease treated with IV zoledronic acid or oral ibandronic acid: a four-centre non-interventional study

AIMS

To describe renal function monitoring practice in patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) treated with IV zoledronic acid (ZA) and oral ibandronic acid (IA), the management pathways and NHS hospital resources used.

METHODS

Medical records of 189 patients; IA (91), ZA (98) with primary breast cancer and MBD were reviewed, and data collected on renal monitoring and hospital visits during bisphosphonate therapy. Time and motion review of resources to administer the bisphosphonates was also conducted.

RESULTS

Only 30% of patients given ZA and no patient given IA had baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) recorded. Calculated baseline CrCl suggested impaired renal function in 33% ZA and 29% IA patients. Dose reductions were not made correctly in 29 ZA and 2 IA patients whose monitoring suggested it. ZA patients made more clinic and day care attendances than IA-treated patients, at twice the cost. Staff activity and patient time per visit was higher with ZA than IA.

CONCLUSION

Although limited by retrospective design, these results demonstrate that in many patients, CrCl is not calculated before or during treatment with bisphosphonates. Renal function deteriorated in many patients during therapy. In view of these effects, practice should be reviewed to ensure appropriate dosing.

A randomised comparative trial of infusional ECisF versus conventional FEC as adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: the TRAFIC trial

BACKGROUND

The epirubicin with cisplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (ECisF) regimen was found to be highly active in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and as neoadjuvant therapy. The UK TRAFIC (trial of adjuvant 5-FU infusional chemotherapy) trial (CRUK/95/007) compared this schedule with 5-FU, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC60) as adjuvant therapy in patients with early breast cancer.

METHODS

In this multicentre, open-label, phase III randomised controlled trial, 349 women were randomly assigned to receive i.v. ECisF [epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2), day 1 and 5-FU 200 mg/m(2) by daily 24-h infusion (n = 172)] or FEC [5-FU 600 mg/m(2), day 1, epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), day 1 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), day 1 (n = 177)]. Both treatments were delivered every 3 weeks for six cycles. The primary end point was relapse-free interval (RFI). TRAFIC is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial (ISRCTN 83324925).

RESULTS

All randomised patients were included in the intent-to-treat population. With a median follow-up of 112 months, there was no significant difference in RFI between the treatment groups [hazard ratio 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.60-1.19); P = 0.33]. Toxic effects were more frequent in patients allocated to ECisF.

CONCLUSIONS

While limited by size, TRAFIC has long follow-up. No evidence of a clinically worthwhile benefit for the infusional treatment compared with standard treatment was observed which would justify further investigation or widespread use.

Neo-tAnGo: A neoadjuvant randomized phase III trial of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel ± gemcitabine in the treatment of women with high-risk early breast cancer (EBC): First report of the primary endpoint, pathological complete response (pCR)

522

Background: Neo-tAnGo used a 2-by-2 factorial design, addressing: (i) gemcitabine (G) in a sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) regimen of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and paclitaxel (T); and (ii) the sequencing of these treatment components (EC then T ± G versus T ± G then EC). Methods: Patients (Pts) with early breast cancer (T2 tumours or above) were randomised to EC then T, T then EC, EC then TG or TG then EC. All components were given x 4 cycles. (E= 90 mg/m2 day (d)1 every (q) 21d; C = 600 mg/m2 d1 q21d; T = 175 mg/m2 d1 q14d; G = 2,000 mg/m2 d1 q14d.) The primary endpoint was pCR, defined as absence of invasive disease in the breast and axillary lymph nodes. 800 pts were required to detect 10% differences in the primary endpoint pCR rates, at the 5% (2-sided) significance level with 85% power. Stratification was by age, inflammatory/locally advanced disease, tumour size, clinical involvement of axillary nodes and oestrogen receptor (ER) status. Results: Between January 2005 and September 2007, 831 pts were randomised by 88 consultants from 57 UK centres. Characteristics were balanced across groups: 63% <50 years old, 25% had inflammatory and/or locally advanced disease, 79% of tumours <50 mm, 50% node positive and 34% ER negative. Two-reader review of 813 (98%) eligible pts'. pathology reports, blinded to treatment arm, were carried out. pCR rates were 17% (95% CI 14–21) for EC&T pts and 17% (95% CI 14–21) for EC&TG pts (p = 0.98). However the sequence T±G then EC, showed pCR of 20% (95% CI 16–24) compared with 15% (95% CI 11–18) for EC then T±G pts (p = 0.03). Adjustment by stratification did not alter results. Conclusions: The Neo-tAnGo results confirm those of the adjuvant tAnGo trial in terms of gemcitabine effect (ASCO 2008). The sequence of T±G-first has demonstrated a significant advantage in pCR compared with the more conventional anthracycline-first sequencing.

[Table: see text]

Use of BIBW 2992, a novel irreversible EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after failure of treatment with trastuzumab

1023

Background: BIBW 2992 (Tovok) is an oral, novel, and potent, irreversible dual epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) inhibitor, with preclinical activity in trastuzumab-resistant cell lines overexpressing HER2 and phase I clinical activity. A phase II study of BIBW 2992 in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who have failed treatment with trastuzumab is currently being conducted in the US and the UK. Methods: This is a multi-institutional open label single arm phase II study, planning to recruit 40 patients. Eligibility criteria include stage IIIB or IV HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, progression following receipt of trastuzumab or intolerance of trastuzumab, measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2 and adequate organ function. Patients receive 50 mg BIBW 2992 once daily until disease progression. Tumor assessments are performed every two courses (one course = 28 days). The primary endpoint is objective response rate (RECIST criteria). Safety data are also collected. Results: To date, 40 patients have started treatment on the trial. Patients had received a median of three lines of prior therapy. Nine patients discontinued treatment prior to the first assessment at 8 weeks; four due to disease progression, four due to adverse events and one due to withdrawal of consent. Twenty-one patients have had tumor assessment after 8 weeks of treatment. Of these, four patients had a partial response (PR) and 10 patients had stable disease (SD). The PR has been confirmed at 16 weeks in one patient. The most frequently observed side effects to date are rash (Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] grade 3 in 4 patients) and diarrhea (CTCAE grade 3 in 8 patients). There were 20 dose reductions in 17 patients. Conclusions: BIBW 2992 at 50 mg/day induced responses and seems promising in HER2-positive breast cancer patients who have failed treatment with trastuzumab. Manageable cutaneous adverse events and diarrhea were the main side effects.

[Table: see text]

Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial

PURPOSE Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly improved in patients who had undergone resection with curative intent for stage II or III colon cancer who received bolus plus continuous-infusion fluorouracil plus leucovorin (LV5FU2) with the addition of oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4). Final results of the study, including 6-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year updated DFS, are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 2,246 patients were randomly assigned to receive LV5FU2 or FOLFOX4 for 6 months. The primary end point was DFS. Secondary end points were OS and safety. Results Five-year DFS rates were 73.3% and 67.4% in the FOLFOX4 and LV5FU2 groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.93; P = .003). Six-year OS rates were 78.5% and 76.0% in the FOLFOX4 and LV5FU2 groups, respectively (HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.00; P = .046); corresponding 6-year OS rates for patients with stage III disease were 72.9% and 68.7%, respectively (HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; P = .023). No difference in OS was seen in the stage II population. The incidence of second noncolorectal cancers was 5.5% and 6.1% in the FOLFOX4 and LV5FU2 groups, respectively. Among patients receiving oxaliplatin, the frequency of grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy was 1.3% 12 months after treatment and 0.7% at 48 months. CONCLUSION Adding oxaliplatin to LV5FU2 significantly improved 5-year DFS and 6-year OS in the adjuvant treatment of stage II or III colon cancer and should be considered after surgery for patients with stage III disease.

The impact of primary tumour origins in patients with advanced oesophageal, oesophago-gastric junction and gastric adenocarcinoma--individual patient data from 1775 patients in four randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

It is unclear if differential chemotherapy effects exist on overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and toxicity depending on primary tumour origin [oesophageal versus oesophago-gastric junction (OGJ) versus gastric adenocarcinoma].

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 2110 patients were enrolled in four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing fluoropyrimidine +/- platinum-based chemotherapy. This analysis used individual patient data and restricted to patients with adenocarcinoma who received one or more dose of chemotherapy. Gastric origin was the control in comparisons of tumour origin.

RESULTS

Of the 2110 patients randomised, 1775 (84%) patients had adenocarcinoma with oesophageal (n = 485), OGJ (n = 457) and gastric (n = 833) origins. The median OS was 9.5 months in oesophageal, 9.3 months in OGJ and 8.7 months in gastric cancer (P = 0.68). RR was 44.1% in oesophageal, 41.1% in OGJ and 35.6% in gastric cancers (P = 0.11 and 0.27, respectively, compared with gastric cancer on multivariate analysis). Toxicity composite end point occurred in 46%, 47% and 45% in oesophageal, OGJ and gastric cancers, respectively (P = 0.85 and 0.62 compared with gastric).

CONCLUSIONS

In our large multicentre RCT dataset, no significant differences were demonstrated on multivariate analyses in OS, RR and toxic effects among patients with advanced oesophageal, OGJ and gastric adenocarcinoma. Future RCTs should not exclude oesophageal adenocarcinoma.