Assessment of Healthcare Provider Workload in Neonatal Resuscitation

Objective: Human errors or protocol deviations during neonatal resuscitation are common. Excess workload has been proposed as a contributor to human error during medical tasks. We aim to characterize healthcare providers' perceived workload during neonatal resuscitation. Design: Perceived workload was measured using a multi-dimensional retrospective National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA TLX) survey. The NASA TLX collects data on mental, physical, and temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration. Each section is rated independently by participants on a scale of 0-20 (0 being lowest and 20 being highest). The Raw-TLX score is a composite score of all dimensions and presented on a scale of 0-100. Healthcare providers complete a paper and pencil survey after attending delivery room resuscitations within 3 months. Setting: Level three neonatal intensive care unit at the Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada. Participants: All neonatal healthcare providers who attended deliveries. Exposure: Participation in the delivery room care of newborns. Measurement: Raw TLX scores as a measure of overall workload and scores for each dimension of workload. Main Results: During the study period, ~880 neonatal resuscitation events occurred, and a total of 204 surveys were completed. Healthcare providers completed one survey for 179 deliveries, two surveys for 20 deliveries, and three surveys for 5 deliveries. The mean (standard deviation) gestational age was 35 (5) weeks, and the median (interquartile range) birth weight was 2,690 (1,830-3,440) g. Interventions at delivery were (i) stimulation 149 (73%), suction 130 (64%), continuous positive airway pressure 120 (59%), positive pressure ventilation 105 (52%), intubation 33 (16%), chest compression 10 (5%), and epinephrine 4 (2%). The overall median (interquartile range) Raw-TLX was 34 (18-49). The scores varied by dimension with mental demand 10 (5-14), physical demand 4 (1-6), temporal demand 8 (3-14), performance 4 (2-6), effort 8 (4-13), and frustration 4 (1-10). Raw-TLX scores were higher when healthcare providers performed any intervention compared to no intervention [35 (22-49) vs. 8 (6-18), p = 0.0011]; intubation and no intubation was [55 (46-62) vs. 30 (17-46), p = 0.0001], and between performing chest compression vs. no chest compression [55 (49-64) vs. 33 (18-47), p = 0.001]. Conclusion: Perceived workload of neonatal healthcare providers increases during higher acuity deliveries. Healthcare providers' workload during neonatal resuscitation can be measured using NASATLX and was inversely associated with 5-min Apgar score. Future studies assessing healthcare providers' perceived workload during neonatal resuscitation in different settings are warranted.

Health Care Providers' Performance, Mindset, and Attitudes Toward a Neonatal Resuscitation Computer-Based Simulator: Empirical Study

BACKGROUND

Neonatal resuscitation involves a complex sequence of actions to establish an infant's cardiorespiratory function at birth. Many of these responses, which identify the best action sequence in each situation, are taught as part of the recurrent Neonatal Resuscitation Program training, but they have a low incidence in practice, which leaves health care providers (HCPs) less prepared to respond appropriately and efficiently when they do occur. Computer-based simulators are increasingly used to complement traditional training in medical education, especially in the COVID-19 pandemic era of mass transition to digital education. However, it is not known how learners' attitudes toward computer-based learning and assessment environments influence their performance.

OBJECTIVE

This study explores the relation between HCPs' attitudes toward a computer-based simulator and their performance in the computer-based simulator, RETAIN (REsuscitation TrAINing), to uncover the predictors of performance in computer-based simulation environments for neonatal resuscitation.

METHODS

Participants were 50 neonatal HCPs (45 females, 4 males, 1 not reported; 16 respiratory therapists, 33 registered nurses and nurse practitioners, and 1 physician) affiliated with a large university hospital. Participants completed a demographic presurvey before playing the game and an attitudinal postsurvey after completing the RETAIN game. Participants' survey responses were collected to measure attitudes toward the computer-based simulator, among other factors. Knowledge on neonatal resuscitation was assessed in each round of the game through increasingly difficult neonatal resuscitation scenarios. This study investigated the moderating role of mindset on the association between the perceived benefits of understanding the terminology used in the computer-based simulator, RETAIN, and their performance on the neonatal resuscitation tasks covered by RETAIN.

RESULTS

The results revealed that mindset moderated the relation between participants' perceived terminology used in RETAIN and their actual performance in the game (F3,44=4.56, R2=0.24, adjusted R2=0.19; P=.007; estimate=-1.19, SE=0.38, t44=-3.12, 95% CI -1.96 to -0.42; P=.003). Specifically, participants who perceived the terminology useful also performed better but only when endorsing more of a growth mindset; they also performed worse when endorsing more of a fixed mindset. Most participants reported that they enjoyed playing the game. The more the HCPs agreed that the terminology in the tutorial and in the game was accessible, the better they performed in the game, but only when they reported endorsing a growth mindset exceeding the average mindset of all the participants (F3,44=6.31, R2=0.30, adjusted R2=0.25; P=.001; estimate=-1.21, SE=0.38, t44=-3.16, 95% CI -1.99 to -0.44; P=.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Mindset moderates the strength of the relationship between HCPs' perception of the role that the terminology employed in a game simulator has on their performance and their actual performance in a computer-based simulator designed for neonatal resuscitation training. Implications of this research include the design and development of interactive learning environments that can support HCPs in performing better on neonatal resuscitation tasks.

Severe neonatal anemia affected by massive fetomaternal hemorrhage: a single-center retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

Massive fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) is a rare but sometimes life-threatening event, and surviving neonates may suffer major neurological complications. Severe neonatal anemia (SNA) affected by massive FMH is less reported in the literature. This study aims to explore the clinical characteristics, laboratory diagnoses, treatments and outcomes of SNA affected by massive FMH.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively from the hospital's electronic medical record system. All neonates born in the hospital and admitted to the neonatal unit diagnosed as SNA affected by massive FMH from 1 January 2013 to 31 June 2017 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 8 cases of SNA affected by FMH were identified among 6825 neonates admitted to the neonatal unit. They all presented with pallor but without hydrops at birth. Median gestational age and birthweight were 37^5/7 (36^0/7‒40^1/7) weeks and 2,625 (2300‒3050) g, respectively. Median hemoglobin level was 39.5 (25‒53) g/L at birth and 109.5 (94-127) g/L at discharge. Median maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was 3958.5 (1606‒14,330) ng/mL, which was significantly increased. Three out of eight cases manifested as antenatal decreased fetal movement. Only 1 with the lowest initial hemoglobin 25 g/L manifested as characteristic sinusoidal fetal heart rate tracing and suffered severe neonatal asphyxia and hypovolemic shock. Having experienced resuscitation, he was admitted to the neonatal unit and received twice transfusion of cross-matched red blood cells there. Another case with the initial hemoglobin 45 g/L received positive pressure ventilation and once transfusion. All cases were successfully discharged with a median hospital stay of 8 (5-12) days. Follow-up was available for 6 (75%) of 8 neonates (age range 13 months to 50 months), and all infants were observed to be in good condition with normal neurological status. In our series of eight cases, there were no neonatal deaths.

CONCLUSION

This study strengthens the idea that maternal AFP testing is valuable to confirm massive fetomaternal hemorrhage. Surviving neonates of massive FMH might have a good outcome despite severe anemia at birth.

Factors associated with neonatal resuscitation knowledge and comfort across academic anesthesia institutions

BACKGROUND

Neonatal resuscitation training is a requirement for all obstetric anesthesia fellows. However, while the majority of anesthesiologists who work on labor and delivery report having been involved in the resuscitation of a newborn, most do not have NRP training.

OBJECTIVE

By studying a national cohort of anesthesiologists, our objective was to identify factors associated with knowledge and comfort with neonatal resuscitation and to inform decisions about neonatal resuscitation in obstetric anesthesia fellowship training.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After receiving exempt status, a survey assessing knowledge and comfort with neonatal resuscitation was sent to US academic institutions. Univariable and multiple variable regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with knowledge and comfort. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (R version 3.4.3 [2017-11-30]; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

RESULTS

Responses were received from 32 (84%) of 38 academic institutions that participated. A total of 245 surveys were collected from 20 December 2018 to 27 September 2019. The mean (standard deviation (SD)) percentage of correct knowledge answers in the cohort was 43.3% (22.6%). Knowledge scores were associated with obstetric anesthesia fellowship training, regularly working with infants, and current neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) training. The mean (SD) sum of comfort ratings from the individual questions was 49.9 (17.9). Comfort ratings were associated with pediatric anesthesia fellowship training, regularly working with infants, current NRP training, and having at least one year of general pediatrics residency training.

CONCLUSIONS

Obstetric anesthesiologists have the knowledge but appear to lack the comfort to perform neonatal resuscitation. As obstetric anesthesiologists are sometimes involved in neonatal resuscitation, maintenance of certification is important in maintaining comfort with neonatal resuscitation if not regularly working with infants.

Neonatal Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations (CoSTR) for neonatal life support includes evidence from 7 systematic reviews, 3 scoping reviews, and 12 evidence updates. The Neonatal Life Support Task Force generally determined by consensus the type of evidence evaluation to perform; the topics for the evidence updates followed consultation with International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation member resuscitation councils. The 2020 CoSTRs for neonatal life support are published either as new statements or, if appropriate, reiterations of existing statements when the task force found they remained valid. Evidence review topics of particular interest include the use of suction in the presence of both clear and meconium-stained amniotic fluid, sustained inflations for initiation of positive-pressure ventilation, initial oxygen concentrations for initiation of resuscitation in both preterm and term infants, use of epinephrine (adrenaline) when ventilation and compressions fail to stabilize the newborn infant, appropriate routes of drug delivery during resuscitation, and consideration of when it is appropriate to redirect resuscitation efforts after significant efforts have failed. All sections of the Neonatal Resuscitation Algorithm are addressed, from preparation through to postresuscitation care. This document now forms the basis for ongoing evidence evaluation and reevaluation, which will be triggered as further evidence is published. Over 140 million babies are born annually worldwide (https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/births-and-deaths-projected-to-2100). If up to 5% receive positive-pressure ventilation, this evidence evaluation is relevant to more than 7 million newborn infants every year. However, in terms of early care of the newborn infant, some of the topics addressed are relevant to every single baby born.

Accuracy of various recent recommendations to estimate the optimal depth of orotracheal tube in Thai neonates

BACKGROUND

Malposition of an endotracheal tube (ETT) may lead to many serious consequences. Recently, various methods have been proposed to estimate the proper position of orotracheal intubation (Pro-depth) for neonates.

OBJECTIVES

To determine and compare the accuracy of various methods for estimating the Pro-depth and to define the most accurate method for the Asian population.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand in Asian neonates who required orotracheal intubation and their ETT's position were confirmed with anteroposterior chest radiographs. The estimated depths of orotracheal tubes (Est-depth) were calculated by using 4 methods: the rule of 7-8-9, NTL + 1 cm, corrected gestational age (GA)-based table, and body weight (BW)-based table. We defined the Pro-depth as the depth which provided the ETT's tip placed at mid trachea. The Pearson's correlation coefficient, the Bland-Altmann plot and mean differences with standard deviation (SD) between paired Est-depth by each method and Pro-depth were determined. New formulae were generated to estimate the Pro-depth based on a linear regression equation. The accuracy of each method to predict the optimal depth of orotracheal intubation (Opt-depth) was calculated.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight Asian neonates were enrolled of which, 82.8% were Thai. The mean ± SD of GA and BW were 33 ± 5 weeks and 1562 ± 842 g, respectively. NTL + 1 cm and the Pro-depth showed the strongest correlation (r = 0.90, p-value < .01) and agreement with mean difference ± SD of 0.28 ± 0.53 cm. The accuracies of the rule of 7-8-9, NTL + 1cm, corrected GA-based and BW-based table to predict the Opt-depth were 56.9%, 63.8%, 62.1%, and 60.3%, respectively. We created two simple formulae for our population to increase the accuracy of NTL parameter: NTL + 1 cm for measured NTL ≤ 6.5 cm and NTL + 0.5 cm for measured NTL > 6.5 cm. This new method provided more accuracy (72.4%) with mean difference ± SD of -0.03 ± 0.53 cm.

CONCLUSION

NTL was the most suitable parameter for estimating the Pro-depth. Our new modified NTL method should be used for Thai neonates with high accuracy and non-significantly underestimated trend. However, promptly clinical assessment and final confirmation by a chest radiography should be done in all intubated patients.

Effect of Computer Debriefing on Acquisition and Retention of Learning After Screen-Based Simulation of Neonatal Resuscitation: Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Debriefing is key in a simulation learning process.

Objective

This study focuses on the impact of computer debriefing on learning acquisition and retention after a screen-based simulation training on neonatal resuscitation designed for midwifery students.

Methods

Midwifery students participated in 2 screen-based simulation sessions, separated by 2 months, session 1 and session 2. They were randomized in 2 groups. Participants of the debriefing group underwent a computer debriefing focusing on technical skills and nontechnical skills at the end of each scenario, while the control group received no debriefing. In session 1, students participated in 2 scenarios of screen-based simulation on neonatal resuscitation. During session 2, the students participated in a third scenario. The 3 scenarios had an increasing level of difficulty, with the first representing the baseline level. Assessments included a knowledge questionnaire on neonatal resuscitation, a self-efficacy rating, and expert evaluation of technical skills as per the Neonatal Resuscitation Performance Evaluation (NRPE) score and of nontechnical skills as per the Anaesthetists’ Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) system. We compared the results of the groups using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

A total of 28 midwifery students participated in the study. The participants from the debriefing group reached higher ANTS scores than those from the control group during session 1 (13.25 vs 9; U=47.5; P=.02). Their scores remained higher, without statistical difference during session 2 (10 vs 7.75; P=.08). The debriefing group had higher self-efficacy ratings at session 2 (3 vs 2; U=52; P=.02). When comparing the knowledge questionnaires, the significant baseline difference (13 for debriefing group vs 14.5 for control group, P=.05) disappeared at the end of session 1 and in session 2. No difference was found for the assessment of technical skills between the groups or between sessions.

Conclusions

Computer debriefing seems to improve nontechnical skills, self-efficacy, and knowledge when compared to the absence of debriefing during a screen-based simulation. This study confirms the importance of debriefing after screen-based simulation.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03844009; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03844009

Heart-rate evaluation using fetal ultrasonic Doppler during neonatal resuscitation

BACKGROUND

The objective of the present study was to verify the speed and accuracy of fetal ultrasonic Doppler (fetal Doppler) in measuring heart rate of newborns at rest, including preterm, low-birthweight infants, and its efficacy during neonatal resuscitation, including cases of neonatal asphyxia.

METHODS

A three-lead electrocardiogram and fetal Doppler were used to measure resting heart rates in 100 newborns, including 48 preterm, low-birthweight infants, at 0 to 72 h after birth. Times to display heart rate were compared between electrocardiogram and fetal Doppler by the Bland-Altman analysis and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The time required for the fetal Doppler to measure heart rate during neonatal resuscitation was also assessed.

RESULTS

In 100 newborns, the mean error of the resting heart rate in 1,293 measurement points was 0.07 beats/min. To display the heart rate, the fetal Doppler required a median time of 5 s, and electrocardiogram required a median time of 10 s (P < 0.001). During neonatal resuscitation, the heart rate was measured within 10 s in 18 of 21 cases (86%) and displayed with a median time of 5 s; this was measured in all neonatal asphyxia cases (9/9, 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Fetal Doppler can measure heart rate in newborns accurately and rapidly and is useful for evaluating heart rate not only at rest but also during neonatal resuscitation, especially in asphyxia.

Delivery Room Management of Infants with Very Low Birth Weight in 3 European Countries-The Video Apgar Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess delivery room management of infants born preterm at 4 Level III perinatal centers in 3 European countries.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective, multicenter observational study. Management at birth was video-recorded and evaluated (Interact version 9.6.1; Mangold-International, Arnstorf, Germany). Data were analyzed and compared within and between centers.

RESULTS

The infants (n = 138) differed significantly with respect to the median (25%, 75%) birth weight (grams) (Center A: 1200 [700, 1550]; Center B: 990 [719, 1240]; Center C: 1174 [835, 1435]; Center D: 1323 [971, 1515] [B vs A, C, D: P < .05]), gestational week (Center A: 28.4 [26.3, 30.0]; Center B: 27.9 [26.7, 29.6]; Center C: 29.3 [26.4, 31.0]; Center D: 30.3 [28.0, 31.9]), Apgar scores, rates of cesarean delivery, and time spent in the delivery room. Management differed significantly for frequency and drying time, rates of electrocardiographic monitoring, suctioning or stimulation, and for fundamental interventions such as time for achieving a reliable peripheral oxygen saturation signal (seconds) (Center A: 97.6 ± 79.3; Center B: 65.1 ± 116.2; Center C: 97.1 ± 67.0; Center D: 114.4 ± 140.5; B vs A, C, D: P < .001) and time for intubation (seconds) (Center A: 48.7 ± 4.2; Center B: 49.0 ± 30.7; Center C: 69.1 ±37.9; Center D: 65.1 ± 23.8; B vs D, P < .025). Mean procedural times did not meet guideline recommendations. The sequence of interventions was similar at all centers.

CONCLUSIONS

The Video Apgar Study showed great variability in and between 4 neonatal centers in Europe. The study also showed it is difficult to adhere to published guidelines for recommended times for important, basic measures such as peripheral oxygen saturation measurements and intubation.

Asynchronous ventilation at 120 compared with 90 or 100 compressions per minute improves haemodynamic recovery in asphyxiated newborn piglets

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether different chest compression (CC) rates during continuous CC with asynchronous ventilations (CCaV) reduce time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and improved haemodynamic recovery in piglets aged 24-72 hours with asphyxia-induced asystole.

METHODS

Thirty piglets (aged 24-72 hours) were anaesthetised, intubated, instrumented and exposed to 30 min normocapnic hypoxia followed by asphyxia. Piglets were randomised into four groups: CCaV with CC rate of 90 (CCaV+90, n=8), 100 (CCaV+100, n=8) or 120 compressions per minute (CCaV+120, n=8), and a sham-operated group (n=6). Cardiac function, carotid blood flow, cerebral and renal oxygenation and respiratory parameters were continuously recorded. Cerebral cortical tissue was harvested and assayed for inflammatory and injury markers.

RESULTS

All three intervention groups had a similar number of piglets achieving ROSC (6/8, 5/8 and 5/8 for CCaV+120, CCaV+100 and CCaV+90, respectively) and mean ROSC time (120, 90 and 90 s for CCaV+120, CCaV+100 and CCaV+90, respectively). The haemodynamic recovery (indicated by carotid flow, cerebral and renal perfusion) was similar between CCaV+120 and sham by the end of experiment. In comparison, CCaV+90 and CCaV+100 had significantly reduced haemodynamic recovery compared with sham operated (p≤0.05). Inflammatory (interleukin [IL]-6 and IL-1β) and injury markers (lactate) were significantly higher in the frontoparietal cortex of CCaV+90 and CCaV+100 compared with sham, whereas brain injury markers were similar between CCaV+120 and sham.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no difference between the groups in achieving ROSC, the haemodynamic recovery of CCaV+120 was significantly improved compared with CCaV+90 and CCaV+100, which were also associated with higher cerebral inflammatory and brain injury markers.

Management of mothers and neonates in low resources setting during covid-19 pandemia

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic started in the Hubei province of China, but is rapidly spreading all over the world. Much of the information and literature have been centered on the adult population while a few reports pertaining to COVID-19 and neonates have been published so far. Actual guidelines are based on expert opinion and show significant differences among the official neonatal societies around the world. Recommendations for the care of neonates born to suspected or confirmed COVD-19 positive mothers in low-resource settings are very limited. This perspective aims to provide practical support for the planning of delivery, resuscitating, stabilizing, and providing postnatal care to an infant born to a mother with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in low-resource settings where resources for managing emergency situations are limited.

Knowledge of Basic Neonatal Resuscitation and Associated Factors Among Midwives and Nurses in Public Health Institutions in Eastern Ethiopia

Background

Neonatal resuscitation is a means to restore life to a baby from the state of asphyxia. It is a single intervention of birth asphyxia. Over 1.2 million African babies are supposed to die in the first four weeks of their life and many of them in the first 24 hours of birth in Sub-Saharan Africa. The major cause of early neonatal death is neonatal asphyxia, which can be prevented by neonatal resuscitation. However, there is limited evidence on midwives’ and nurses’ knowledge of neonatal resuscitation in the study area. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the knowledge of midwives and nurses about neonatal resuscitation and its associated factors.

Methods

This facility-based cross-sectional study was done on 427 midwives and nurses, who were selected using simple random sampling technique. Data were collected on facility type, availability of essential equipment, socio-demographic characteristics, working unit, professional experience, in-service training, and knowledge of neonatal resuscitation. First-degree holder midwives collected the data using a pre-tested face-to-face interviewer-administered questionnaire. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between the dependent and independent variables.

Results

The study showed that 9.8% of the study participants had good knowledge about neonatal resuscitation. Factors significantly associated with knowledge of neonatal resuscitation were being trained on newborn resuscitation (AOR = 3.79, 95% CI: 1.73, 8.32), being unmarried (AOR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.11, 5.02), holding bachelor sciences degree or above (AOR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.11, 6.47), and working under West Hararghe health institutions (AOR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.88).

Conclusion

The study participants had low knowledge of neonatal resuscitation. Being unmarried, holding bachelor sciences degree or above, being trained on neonatal resuscitation, and working under West Hararghe health institutions were factors associated with the knowledge of the study participants on neonatal resuscitation.

Neonatal Resuscitation and Postresuscitation Care of Infants Born to Mothers with Suspected or Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection

The first case of novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was reported in November2019. The rapid progression to a global pandemic of COVID-19 has had profound medical, social, and economic consequences. Pregnant women and newborns represent a vulnerable population. However, the precise impact of this novel virus on the fetus and neonate remains uncertain. Appropriate protection of health care workers and newly born infants during and after delivery by a COVID-19 mother is essential. There is some disagreement among expert organizations on an optimal approach based on resource availability, surge volume, and potential risk of transmission. The manuscript outlines the precautions and steps to be taken before, during, and after resuscitation of a newborn born to a COVID-19 mother, including three optional variations of current standards involving shared-decision making with parents for perinatal management, resuscitation of the newborn, disposition, nutrition, and postdischarge care. The availability of resources may also drive the application of these guidelines. More evidence and research are needed to assess the risk of vertical and horizontal transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and its impact on fetal and neonatal outcomes. KEY POINTS: · The risk of vertical transmission is unclear; transmission from family members/providers to neonates is possible.. · Optimal personal-protective-equipment (airborne vs. droplet/contact precautions) for providers is crucial to prevent transmission.. · Parents should be engaged in shared decision-making with options for rooming in, skin-to-skin contact, and breastfeeding..

Simulation-guided preparations for the management of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases in the obstetric emergency theater

Aims: The coronavirus 2019 infection (COVID-19) global outbreak has resulted in unprecedented pressures on health services, the need to prepare for the worst-case scenario, and the need for health experts to utilize their knowledge and expertise to fight this virus. The simulation training objective of this study was to enhance the neonatal, maternity, and anesthetics teams' preparedness for the management of the emergency delivery of pregnant women with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection.Methods: Three clinical simulation training sessions were conducted in March 2020 at the University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, UK. The neonatal, maternity, and anesthetics clinical teams participated in these joint training sessions in the obstetric emergency theater.Results: Each session lasted for around an hour. Suggestions were discussed and recommendations made. The key changes were: first, floor plan adjustment, increase of the clinical area by converting some offices to clinical spaces, and standard operating procedures for transporting patients; second, enhancement of the efficiency of the communication and coordination between the clinical teams; third, availability of extra support for the staff in the Central Delivery Suite (CDS); and fourth, introduction of a neonatal care pathway to manage neonatal resuscitation in such an emergency.Conclusions: Collaboration and joint training between the different clinical teams involved in the care of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients was proven to be one of the most effective ways of improving performance.

Effect of monitor positioning on visual attention and situation awareness during neonatal resuscitation: a randomised simulation study

OBJECTIVES

To compare situation awareness (SA), visual attention (VA) and protocol adherence in simulated neonatal resuscitations using two different monitor positions.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled simulation study.

SETTINGS

Simulation lab at the Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Healthcare providers (HCPs) with Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) certification within the last 2 years and trained in neonatal endotracheal intubations.

INTERVENTION

HCPs were randomised to either central (eye-level on the radiant warmer) or peripheral (above eye-level, wall-mounted) monitor positions. Each led a complex resuscitation with a high-fidelity mannequin and a standardised assistant. To measure SA, situation awareness global assessment tool (SAGAT) was used, where simulations were paused at three predetermined points, with five questions asked each pause. Videos were analysed for SAGAT and adherence to a NRP checklist. Eye-tracking glasses recorded participants' VA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The main outcome was SA as measured by composite SAGAT score. Secondary outcomes included VA and adherence to NRP checklist.

RESULTS

Thirty simulations were performed; 29 were completed per protocol and analysed. Twenty-two eye-tracking recordings were of sufficient quality and analysed. Median composite SAGAT was 11.5/15 central versus 11/15 peripheral, p=0.56. Checklist scores 46/50 central versus 46/50 peripheral, p=0.75. Most VA was directed at the mannequin (30.6% central vs 34.1% peripheral, p=0.76), and the monitor (28.7% central vs 20.5% peripheral, p=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Simulation, SAGAT and eye-tracking can be used to evaluate human factors of neonatal resuscitation. During simulated neonatal resuscitation, monitor position did not affect SA, VA or protocol adherence.

Ectogestation ethics: The implications of artificially extending gestation for viability, newborn resuscitation and abortion

Recent animal research suggests that it may soon be possible to support the human fetus in an artificial uterine environment for part of a pregnancy. A technique of extending gestation in this way ("ectogestation") could be offered to parents of extremely premature infants (EPIs) to improve outcomes for their child. The use of artificial uteruses for ectogestation could generate ethical questions because of the technology's potential impact on the point of "viability"-loosely defined as the stage of pregnancy beyond which the fetus may survive external to the womb. Several medical decisions during the perinatal period are based on the gestation at which infants are considered viable, for example decisions about newborn resuscitation and abortion, and ectogestation has the potential to impact on these. Despite these possible implications, there is little existing evidence or analysis of how this technology would affect medical practice. In this paper, we combine empirical data with ethical analysis. We report a survey of 91 practicing Australian obstetricians and neonatologists; we aimed to assess their conceptual understanding of "viability," and what ethical consequences they envisage arising from improved survival of EPIs. We also assess what the ethical implications of extending gestation should be for newborn and obstetric care. We analyze the concept of viability and argue that while ectogestation might have implications for the permissibility of neonatal life-prolonging treatment at extremely early gestation, it should not necessarily have implications for abortion policy. We compare our ethical findings with the results of the survey.

A targeted systematic review of cost analyses for implementation of simulation-based education in healthcare

Over the past two decades, there has been an increase in the use of simulation-based education for training healthcare providers in technical and non-technical skills. Simulation education and research programs have mostly focused on the impact on clinical knowledge and improvement of technical skills rather than on cost. To study and characterize existing evidence to inform multi-stakeholder investment decisions, we performed a systematic review of the literature on costs in simulation-based education in medicine in general and in neonatal resuscitation as a particular focus. We conducted a systematic literature search of the PubMed database using two targeted queries. The first searched for cost analyses of healthcare simulation-based education more broadly, and the second was more narrowly focused on cost analyses of neonatal resuscitation training. The more general query identified 47 qualified articles. The most common specialties for education interventions were surgery (51%); obstetrics, gynecology, or pediatrics (11%); medicine, nursing, or medical school (11%); and urology (9%), accounting for over 80% of articles. The neonatal resuscitation query identified five qualified articles. The two queries identified seven large-scale training implementation studies, one in the United States and six in low-income countries. There were two articles each from Tanzania and India and one article each from Zambia and Ghana. Methods, definitions, and reported estimates varied across articles, implying interpretation, comparison, and generalization of program effects are challenging. More work is needed to understand the costs, processes, and outcomes likely to make simulation-based education programs cost-effective and scalable. To optimize return on investments in training, assessing resource requirements, associated costs, and subsequent outcomes can inform stakeholders about the potential sustainability of SBE programs. Healthcare stakeholders and decision makers will benefit from more transparent, consistent, rigorous, and explicit assessments of simulation-based education program development and implementation costs in low- and high-income countries.

Intention to treat: obstetrical management at the threshold of viability

BACKGROUND

Despite medical advances in the care of extremely preterm neonates and growing acceptance of resuscitation at 23 and even 22 weeks gestation, controversy remains concerning the use of antepartum obstetric intervention s that are intended to improve outcomes in the setting of anticipated extremely preterm birth. In the absence of demonstrated benefit at <23 weeks gestation and with uncertain benefit at 23 weeks gestation, previous obstetric committee opinions have advised against their use at these gestational ages.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to review the use of obstetric intervention s at the threshold of viability based on neonatal resuscitation plan and to review the odds of survival to neonatal intensive care unit discharge based on use of obstetric intervention s with adjustment for neonatal factors.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study of 6 study centers reviewed pregnant patients who were admitted between 22+0/7 and 24+6/7 weeks gestation facing delivery from 2011-2015. Patients with known anomalies or missing data were excluded. Records were reviewed for demographics, resuscitation plan, and obstetric intervention s. Mode of delivery, delivery room care, and final infant dispositions were recorded. Multiple gestations were included as 1 pregnancy in regard to the use of obstetric intervention s and were excluded from survival analysis.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventy-eight mothers met the inclusion criteria. When resuscitation was planned, mothers were more likely to receive all conventional obstetric intervention s (antenatal steroids, magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection, tocolytics, and Group Beta Streptococcus prophylaxis), regardless of gestational age at admission, and were more likely to be delivered by cesarean section (P<.05). Analyzed as a group, when antenatal steroids, magnesium sulfate, tocolytics and Group Beta Streptococcus prophylaxis were administered, the odds of survival to neonatal intensive care unit discharge increased for newborn infants who were born at 22 (odds ratio, 11.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.405-91.4) and 23 weeks gestation (odds ratio, 15.5; 95% confidence interval, 3.747-64.11; P<.05). In singletons, the odds of survival to neonatal intensive care unit discharge was not improved by cesarean delivery vs vaginal delivery, even after adjustment for the use of additional interventions, weight, gender, and gestational age (odds ratio, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-1.8; P=.912).

CONCLUSION

In this study, when postnatal resuscitation was planned at 22 and 23 weeks gestation, women were more likely to receive antenatal steroids, magnesium sulfate, and antibiotics; provision of this bundle imparted survival benefit at 23 weeks gestation but could not be demonstrated at 22 weeks gestation because of the small sample size. These findings support of neonate-oriented obstetric interventions in the setting of delivery at 23 weeks gestation when resuscitation is planned and further exploration of optimal obstetric care when resuscitation of infants who were born at 22 weeks gestation is anticipated.

Heart Rate Assessment during Neonatal Resuscitation

Approximately 10% of newborn infants require some form of respiratory support to successfully complete the fetal-to-neonatal transition. Heart rate (HR) determination is essential at birth to assess a newborn’s wellbeing. Not only is it the most sensitive indicator to guide interventions during neonatal resuscitation, it is also valuable for assessing the infant’s clinical status. As such, HR assessment is a key step at birth and throughout resuscitation, according to recommendations by the Neonatal Resuscitation Program algorithm. It is essential that HR is accurate, reliable, and fast to ensure interventions are delivered without delay and not prolonged. Ineffective HR assessment significantly increases the risk of hypoxic injury and infant mortality. The aims of this review are to summarize current practice, recommended techniques, novel technologies, and considerations for HR assessment during neonatal resuscitation at birth.

Positive pressure ventilation coaching during neonatal bag-mask ventilation: A simulation-based pilot study

BACKGROUND

Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is the most important procedure during neonatal resuscitation. Providing effective PPV seems easy. However, performing the procedure correctly is extremely challenging. Airway obstruction and face mask large leaks are common. It is estimated that two-thirds of continued neonatal respiratory depression after the time of birth is caused by ineffective or improperly provided PPV. Finding methods to improve PPV performance are critically needed. Performance coaching is a simple and easy method of improving performing in procedural skills, and has been used previously to optimize compression technique. We performed the simulation-based pilot study to evaluate the impact of PPV coaching during neonatal bag-mask ventilation.

METHODS

Randomized cross-over study of nurses performing PPV on a SMART Newborn Resuscitation Training System with, and without, coaching. The PPV coach provided real-time feedback on chest rise, mask hold, and ventilation rate. The SMART system captured data on peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), tidal volume (Vt), mask leak, and ventilation rate. Data were analyzed by a blinded reviewer.

RESULTS

PPV coaching resulted in more appropriate PIPs (34 cmH2O, IQR 32-38 vs. 36 cmH2O, IQR 28-37; P < 0.001), lower Vt (4.7 ml/kg, IQR 4-8 vs. 5.5 ml/kg, IQR 4-13; P < 0.001), and less mask leak (39% leak, IQR 21-70 vs. 45%, IQR 22-98; P = 0.005). There was no difference in respiratory rate (P = 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Coaching improved PPV performance in this simulation-based pilot study. Further research on PPV coaching during neonatal resuscitation is warranted.

Ultrasonographic confirmation of endotracheal intubation in extremely low birthweigh infants - secondary publication

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of ultrasonography (US) for confirmation of endotracheal tube (ETT) placement during resuscitation in extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of ELBW infants in whom ETT position was verified using US between June 2016 and September 2017. We investigated the backgrounds of the patients and US investigators, and the time required for the detection of exhaled carbon dioxide using the colorimetric method and US.

RESULTS

Eleven ELBW infants were evaluated using US by four neonatologists. The median duration required to determine the ETT position by the colorimetric method and US were 11 s and 3 s, respectively. In six ELBW infants, we were able to verify the ETT position more rapidly using US than using the colorimetric method, and were able to perform prompt resuscitation. Unnecessary reintubations were avoided in three ELBW infants.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography allowed the swift confirmation of the tracheal intubations. The colorimetric method yielded false negative results; in such cases, unnecessary reintubation could have been avoided if US was used. We assessed the mechanism of false negative results and performed appropriate resuscitation.

Simulation-Based Summative Assessment of Neonatal Resuscitation Providers Using the RETAIN Serious Board Game-A Pilot Study

Background: Each year, 13-26 million newborn babies require help to breathe at birth. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) who provide neonatal resuscitative care must be frequently evaluated to maintain and improve the quality of healthcare delivered. While simulation-based competence assessment is preferred, resource constraints hinder uptake. We aimed to examine if the RETAIN simulation-based boardgame can be used to assess HCPs' neonatal resuscitation knowledge. Method: Twenty neonatal HCPs (19 females) from the Royal Alexandra Hospital (Edmonton, Canada) were recruited. First, they completed an open-answer written test of one neonatal resuscitation scenario. Then, they completed one neonatal resuscitation scenario of difficulty comparable to that of the open-answer written test, but this time using the RETAIN board game. In the RETAIN board game (https://playretain.com, RETAIN Labs Medical Inc, Edmonton, Canada), players perform simulated neonatal resuscitation scenarios based on real-life cases, using action cards, and equipment pieces. Sessions were video-recorded and scored using Neonatal Resuscitation Program 2015 guidelines. Data are reported as mean (standard deviation) for normally distributed continuous variables, and as median (interquartile range) for non-normal continuous variables. Results: Participants consisted of the following HCPs: 8 nurses, 4 respiratory therapists, 4 nurse practitioners, and 4 neonatal fellows with median (IQR) 10.5(3-17) years of clinical experience. Overall mean (SD) Open-answer test and Game Performance was 8.6(2.1) out of 16 possible points (53%) and 29(3.2) out of 40 possible points (74%), respectively. Out of the 10 actions shared between the open-answer test and game scenario, performance on the open-answer test was mean (SD) 7.2(1.3) (72%) and game performance was mean (SD) 8.8(1.4) (88%) (V = 17, p < 0.01). Conclusion: RETAIN may provide an enjoyable and standardized alternative toward summative assessment of neonatal resuscitation providers. RETAIN may be used to improve more frequent and ubiquitous uptake of simulation-based competence assessment in healthcare settings.

Asphyxiated Female and Male Newborn Piglets Have Similar Outcomes With Different Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Interventions

Background: Male newborns have a greater risk of poor cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes compared to females. The mechanisms associated with the "male disadvantage" remains unclear. We have previously shown no difference between male and female newborn piglets during hypoxia, asphyxia, resuscitation, and post-resuscitation recovery. However, it is unknown if there are differences in resuscitation outcomes between males and females during different cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques. Intervention and Measurements: Secondary analysis of 184 term newborn mixed breed duroc piglets (1-3 days of age, weighing 2.0 (0.2) kg) from seven different studies, which were exposed to 30-50 min of normocapnic hypoxia followed by asphyxia until asystole. This was followed by cardiopulmonary resuscitation. For the analysis, piglets were divided into male and female groups, as well as resuscitation technique groups (sustained inflation, 3:1 compression-to-ventilation ratio, or asynchronous ventilations during chest compressions). Cardiac function, carotid blood flow, and cerebral oxygenation were continuously recorded throughout the experiment. Main results: Regardless of resuscitation technique, there was no significant difference between males and females in the number achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) [95/123 (77%) vs. 48/61 (79%)], the time to achieve ROSC [112 (80-185) s vs. 110 (77-186) s], and the 4-h survival rate [81/95 (85%) vs. 40/48 (83%)]. Levels of the injury markers interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α in frontoparietal cortex tissue homogenates were similar between males and females. Conclusions: Regardless of resuscitation technique, there was no significant effect of sex on resuscitation outcome, survival, and hemodynamic recovery in asphyxiated newborn piglets.

Simulation in Neonatal Resuscitation

Approximately 1 in 10 newborns will require basic resuscitation interventions at birth. Some infants progress to require more advanced measures including the provision of positive pressure ventilation, chest compressions, intubation and administration of volume/cardiac medications. Although advanced resuscitation is infrequent, it is crucial that personnel adequately trained in these techniques are available to provide such resuscitative measures. In 2000, Louis Halmalek et al. called for a "New Paradigm in Pediatric Medical Education: Teaching Neonatal Resuscitation in a Simulated Delivery Room Environment." This was one of the first articles to highlight simulation as a method of teaching newborn resuscitation. The last decades have seen an exponential growth in the area of simulation in newborn care, in particular in newborn resuscitation and stabilization. Simulation is best defined as an instructional strategy "used to replace or amplify real experiences with guided experiences that evoke or replicate substantial aspects of the real world in a fully interactive manner." Simulation training has now become an important point of how we structure training and deliver improved healthcare to patients. Some of the key aspects of simulation training include feedback, deliberate practice, outcome measurement, retention of skills and curriculum integration. The term "Train to win" is often used in sporting parlance to define how great teams succeed. The major difference between sports teams is that generally their game day comes once a week, whereas in newborn resuscitation every day is potentially "game day." In this review we aim to summarize the current evidence on the use of simulation based education and training in neonatal resuscitation, with particular emphasis on the evidence supporting its effectiveness. We will also highlight recent advances in the development of simulation based medical education in the context of newborn resuscitation to ensure we "train to win."