Long-term functional recovery in C5-C6 avulsions treated with distal nerve transfers

BACKGROUND

In patients suffering from traction lesions of the brachial plexus, complete C5 and/or C6 root avulsion patients with C7 root preservation are relatively uncommon occurrences, but represent excellent candidates for surgical treatment, with satisfactory results. Shoulder abduction and extra-rotation, elbow flexion and forearm supination are lost functions restorable with surgical treatment.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective observational study involved a series of 27 young adults with C5 and/or C6 root complete avulsion and C7 preservation, which underwent surgical repair with double or triple nerve transfer.

RESULTS

Patients recovered a useful elbow flexion. Electromyographic and clinical signs of biceps reinnervation were observed in each UN-MC nerve transfer. The abduction strength recovery was M5 in 10 patients, M4 in 14 patients and M3 in 3 patients. The external rotation strength recovery was M5 in 4 patients, M4 in 18 patients, M3 in 3 patients and M2 in 2 patients. The elbow flection strength was M5 in 5 patients, M4 in 15 patients and M3 in 7 patients. Elbow extension was preserved in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The concept of 'peripheral rewiring procedures' represents an advance in the repair of the peripheral nerve injuries. Triple nerve transfer can be nowadays considered a standard treatment for isolated C5-C6 avulsions. We report our experience with the second-biggest casuistry in the literature on patients treated with this technique. We consider our outcome concerning functional recovery to be satisfying and comparable to data reported in the literature.

Triple nerve transfers for the management of early unilateral facial palsy

BACKGROUND

Early onset facial paralysis is usually managed with cross-face nerve grafts, however the low number of axons that reach the target muscle may result in weakness or failure. Multiple-source innervation, or 'supercharging', seeks to combine the advantages of different donor nerves while minimizing their weaknesses. We propose a combination of cross-face nerve grafts with local extra-facial nerve transfers to achieve earlier facial reanimation in our patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort including all patients with early unilateral facial palsy (<12 months evolution) who underwent triple nerve transfer between 2019 and 2021 was conducted. We performed single-stage procedure including zygomatic-to-zygomatic and buccal-to-buccal cross-face grafts, a nerve-to-masseter to bucozygomatic trunk transfer, and a mini-hypoglossal to marginal branch transfer. Results were evaluated using the clinician-graded facial function scale (eFACE).

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were included (eight females, seven males), mean age at the time of surgery was 48.9 ± 13.3 years. Palsy was right-sided in eight cases. The mean time from palsy onset to surgery was 5.5 ± 2.8 months. Patients showed improvement in static (70.8 ± 21.9 vs. 84.15 ± 6.68, p = 0.002) and dynamic scores (20 ± 16.32 vs. 74.23 ± 7.46, p < 0.001), as well as periocular (57.33 ± 15.23 vs. 74 ± 7.18, p = 0.007), smile (54.73 ± 11.93 vs. 85.62 ± 3.86, p < 0.001), mid-face (46.33 ± 18.04 vs. 95 ± 7.21, p < 0.001) and lower face scores (67.4 ± 1.55 vs. 90.31 ± 7.54, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The triple nerve transfer technique using cross-face nerve grafts, the nerve-to-masseter, and the hypoglossal nerve, is an effective and reproducible technique to obtain middle and lower face reanimation in cases of early facial palsy.

Fascicular shifting in the reconstruction of brachial plexus injuries: an anatomical and clinical evaluation

OBJECTIVE

Until recently, autologous sensory nerve grafting has remained the gold-standard technique in peripheral nerve reconstruction. However, there are several disadvantages to these grafts, such as donor site morbidity, limited availability, and a qualitative mismatch. Building on this shortage, a new concept, the fascicular shift procedure, was proposed and successfully demonstrated nerve regeneration in a rat nerve injury model. This approach involves harvesting a fascicular group distal to a peripheral nerve injury and shifting it to bridge the defect. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical applicability of this technique in brachial plexus reconstruction.

METHODS

The supra- and infraclavicular nerves of the brachial plexus were bilaterally explored in 18 formalin-fixed cadaveric specimens. Following dissection, their fascicular shifting potential was evaluated. The medial antebrachial cutaneous and sural nerves were investigated and used as references for the required cross-sectional area of potential nerve grafts. Furthermore, 29 brachial plexus injuries, which qualified for surgical repair, were subjected to retrospective analysis. The intraoperatively measured lengths of the harvested and ultimately transplanted nerve grafts served as a basis to assess graft requirements in brachial plexus lesions.

RESULTS

The transplanted nerve grafts measured a total length of 51.9 ± 28.1 cm in brachial plexus injuries. The individual inserted nerve grafts averaged 10.3 ± 5.1 cm. In the anatomical exploration, the ulnar and median nerves qualified for fascicular shifting. Their fascicular graft lengths measured 26.6 ± 2.5 cm and 24.8 ± 5.2 cm, respectively. The long thoracic, suprascapular, musculocutaneous, thoracodorsal, and axillary nerves were not suitable for fascicular shifting. The sensory graft length of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve measured 20.6 ± 3.4 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

In the surgical reconstruction of brachial plexus injuries, fascicular shifting of the ulnar and median nerves provides sufficient donor material. Even though potential donor length is limited in the radial nerve, it may still help to expand the surgical armamentarium in selected clinical scenarios. Overall, the fascicular shift procedure presents a novel alternative to allow modality-matched grafting in the reconstruction of large proximal nerve defects and was found to be an attractive option in brachial plexus reconstruction.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A Systematic Review of Nerve Transfers for the Upper Extremity

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

Despite inspiring improvements in postamputation pain and prosthetic control, targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) continues to be underused. With some consistency for recommended nerve transfers developing in the literature, it is necessary to systematize these techniques and simplify their incorporation into routine amputation and neuroma care. This systematic review explores the coaptations reported in the literature to date.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to collect all reports describing nerve transfers in the upper extremity. The preference was directed toward original studies presenting surgical techniques and coaptations used in TMR. All target muscle options were presented for each nerve transfer in the upper extremity.

RESULTS

Twenty-one original studies describing TMR nerve transfers throughout the upper extremity met inclusion criteria. A comprehensive list of transfers reported for major peripheral nerves at each upper extremity amputation level was included in tables. Ideal nerve transfers were suggested based on convenience and frequency with which certain coaptations were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasingly frequent studies are published with convincing outcomes with TMR and numerous options for nerve transfers and target muscles. It is prudent to appraise these options to provide patients with optimal outcomes. Certain muscles are more consistently targeted and can serve as a baseline plan for the reconstructive surgeon interested in incorporating these techniques.

Nerve Transfer Is Superior to Nerve Grafting for Suprascapular Nerve Reconstruction in Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Birth Injury: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Restoration of shoulder function in obstetrical brachial plexus injury is paramount. There remains debate as to the optimal method of upper trunk reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer leads to improved shoulder external rotation relative to sural nerve grafting.

METHODS

A systematic review of Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO CINAHL, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and TRIP Pro from inception was conducted. Our primary outcome was shoulder external rotation.

RESULTS

Four studies were included. Nerve transfer was associated with greater shoulder external rotation relative to nerve grafting (mean difference: 0.82 AMS 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-1.36, P < .005). Patients undergoing nerve grafting were more likely to undergo a secondary shoulder stabilizing procedure (odds ratio [OR]: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.8376-1.9268).

CONCLUSION

In obstetrical brachial plexus injury, nerve transfer is associated with improved shoulder external rotation and a lower rate of secondary shoulder surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; Therapeutic.

Is there any difference between anterior and posterior approach for the spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dual nerve transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve (SAN-SSN) and the radial nerve to the axillary nerve is considered to be the most feasible method of restoration of shoulder abduction in brachial plexus injuries. Supraspinatus muscle plays an important role in the initiation of abduction and its functional restoration is crucial for shoulder movements. There are two possible approaches for the SAN-SSN transfer: the more conventional anterior approach and the posterior approach in the area of scapular spine, which allows more distal neurotization. Although the dual nerve transfer is a widely used method, it is unclear which approach for the SAN-SSN transfer results in better outcomes. We conducted a search of English literature from January 2001 to December 2021 using the PRISMA guidelines. Twelve studies with a total 142 patients met our inclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the approach used: Group A included patients who underwent the anterior approach, and Group B included patients who underwent the posterior approach. Abduction strength using the Medical Research Scale (MRC) and range of motion (ROM) were assessed. The average MRC grade was 3.57 ± 1.08 in Group A and 4.0 ± 0.65 (p = 0.65) in Group B. The average ROM was 114.6 ± 36.7 degrees in Group A and 103.4 ± 37.2 degrees in Group B (p = 0.247). In conclusion, we did not find statistically significant differences between SAN-SSN transfers performed from the anterior or posterior approach in patients undergoing dual neurotization technique for restoration of shoulder abduction.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) aided full-length phrenic nerve transfer for restoration of elbow flexion

BACKGROUND

In complete brachial plexus injury, phrenic nerve (PN) is frequently used in neurotization for elbow flexion restoration. The advancement in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) allows full-length PN dissection intrathoracically for direct coaptation to recipient without nerve graft.

PURPOSE

We report our experience in improving the surgical technique and its outcome.

METHODS

Seven patients underwent PN dissection via VATS and full-length transfer to musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) or motor branch of biceps (MBB) from June 2015 to June 2018. Comparisons were made with similar group of patients who underwent conventional PN transfer.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 21.9 years. All were males involved in motorcycle accidents who sustained complete brachial plexus injury. We found the elbow flexion recovery were earlier in full-length PN transfer. However, there was no statistically significant difference in elbow flexion strength at 3 years post-surgery.

CONCLUSION

We propose full-length PN transfer for restoration of elbow flexion in patients with delayed presentation.

Is it possible to follow the risk of rupture after end-to-end nerve repairs in brachial plexus surgery? Technical note

OBJECTIVE

In traumatic and obstetric brachial plexus injuries, removal of the damaged nerve, repair with the nerve grafts, and nerve transfers are mostly preferred techniques. Success is directly proportional to surgical technique as it is known that end-to-end repair of the peripheral nerves gives better results. The greatest risk in end-to-end repair is the nerve rupture at the brachial plexus repair region and this cannot be detected by conventional radiological techniques.

METHODS

Brachial plexus injuries of obstetrical and traumatic patients were operated. If possible and at least one nerve was repaired end to end, follow-up of nerve continuity was done by titanium hemopclip insertion to both sides of the nerve repair area. A new technique nerve repair site marking was developed and end-to-end nerve repair continuity was followed simply by x-ray.

RESULTS

This technique was used for end-to-end nerve coaptions of 38 obstetric and 40 traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Follow-up was done for 6 weeks. Every week patients sent the x-ray of the repair site. Only 3 patients had nerve repair site rupture, and revision surgery was done immediately.

CONCLUSION

Nerve repair site marking technique and follow-up with only x-ray is a simple reliable, safe, and cheap method that can be applied to any end-to-end nerve repair. This technique has no morbidity or side effects. The aim of the study is to summarize or explain the nerve repair site marking technique used in the brachial plexus region.

Reverse End-to-Side Transfer to Ulnar Motor Nerve: Evidence From Preclinical and Clinical Studies

The disappointing outcomes of conventional nerve repair or grafting procedures for proximal ulnar nerve injuries have led the scientific community to search for better alternatives. The pronator quadratus branch of the anterior interosseous nerve has been transferred to the distal ulnar motor branch in a reverse end-to-side fashion with encouraging results. This transfer is now becoming commonly used as an adjunct to cubital tunnel decompression in patients with compressive ulnar neuropathy, underscoring the need for this knowledge transfer to the neurosurgical community. However, the mechanism of recovery after these transfers is not understood completely. We have reviewed the existing preclinical and clinical literature relevant to this transfer to summarize the current level of understanding of the underlying mechanisms, define the indications for performing this transfer in the clinic, and identify the complications and best practices with respect to the operative technique. We have also attempted to identify the major deficiencies in our current level of understanding of the recovery process to propose directions for future research.

Reducing Risk in Facial Reanimation Surgery

Facial reanimation surgery can greatly improve quality of life, but these procedures are not without risk. Important considerations for risk reduction in facial reanimation surgery include preoperative risk-stratification, protecting patients' clinical media, clearly and thoroughly setting expectations, and intraoperative strategies to maximize technical success and minimize operative time.

Selective Repair of Motor Branches in the Femoral Nerve by Transferring the Motor Branches of Obturator Nerve: An Anatomical Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Anterior branch of the obturator nerve transfer has been proven as an effective method for femoral nerve injuries, but the patient still has difficulty in rising and squatting, up and downstairs. Here, we presented a novel neurotization procedure of selectively repairing 3 motor branches of the femoral nerve by transferring motor branches of the obturator nerve in the thigh level and assessing its anatomical feasibility.

METHODS

Eight adult cadavers (16 thighs) were dissected. The nerve overlap distance between the gracilis branch and the rectus femoris (RF) branch, the adductor longus (AL) branch and the vastus medialis (VM) branch, as well as the adductor magnus (AM) branch and the vastus intermedius (VI) branch were measured. Also, the axon counts of the donor and recipient nerve were evaluated by histological evaluation.

RESULTS

In all specimens, nerve overlap of at least 2.1 cm was observed in all 16 dissected thighs between the donor and recipient nerve branches, and the repair appeared to be without tension. There is no significant difference in the axon counts between gracilis branch (598 ± 83) and the RF branch (709 ± 151). The axon counts of the AL branch (601 ± 93) was about half of axon counts of the VM branch (1423 ± 189), and the axon counts of AM branch (761 ± 110) was also about half of the VI branch (1649 ± 281).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel technique of the combined nerve transfers below the inguinal ligament, specifically the gracilis branch to the RF branch, the AL branch to the VM branch, and the AM branch to the VI branch, is anatomically feasible. It provides a promising alternative in the repair of femoral nerve injuries and an anatomical basis for the clinical application of motor branches of the obturator nerve transfer to repair the motor portion of the injured femoral nerve.

Corneal neurotization in the management of neurotrophic keratopathy: A review of the literature

Neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) is a rare degenerative disease in which damage to the corneal nerves leads to corneal hypoesthesia or anesthesia. Neurotrophic corneal ulcers are notoriously difficult to treat and can lead to blindness. Corneal neurotization (CN) is a recent surgical technique aimed at restoring corneal sensation and may offer a definitive treatment in the wake of NK. Herein, we review the surgical techniques utilized in direct and indirect CN. Technical considerations, outcomes, current limitations and future perspectives are also discussed. This article highlights the key points of this promising procedure and biological aspects that will help provide the best treatment options for patients with severe NK.

Elevated Body Mass Index Negatively Impacts Recovery of Shoulder Abduction Strength in Triceps Motor Branch to Axillary Nerve Transfers

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this work was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of triceps motor branch to axillary nerve transfers and to identify prognostic factors which may influence these outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort included all patients who underwent a triceps motor branch to axillary nerve transfer (2010-2019) with at least 12 months of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was shoulder abduction strength assessed with British Medical Research Council (MRC) grade.

RESULTS

Ten patients were included with a mean follow-up of 19.1 (SD 5.9) months. Compared with preoperative MRC shoulder abduction strength (0.2 SD 0.4), patients significantly improved postoperatively (2.8 SD 1.6; P = .005). Increased body mass index (BMI) was significantly associated with worse postoperative MRC (P = .014).

CONCLUSION

Triceps motor branch to axillary nerve transfer is a beneficial procedure for restoring shoulder function in patients presenting with either isolated axillary nerve or brachial plexus pathology. Patients with elevated BMI may not have as robust strength recovery and should be counseled carefully regarding prognosis.

Trends in Brachial Plexus Surgery: Characterizing Contemporary Practices for Exploration of Supraclavicular Plexus

BACKGROUND

There is variability in treatment strategies for patients with brachial plexus injury (BPI). We used qualitative research methods to better understand surgeons' rationale for treatment approaches. We hypothesized that distal nerve transfers would be preferred over exploration and nerve grafting of the brachial plexus.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with BPI surgeons to discuss 3 case vignettes: pan-plexus injury, upper trunk injury, and lower trunk injury. The interview guide included questions regarding overall treatment strategy, indications and utility of brachial plexus exploration, and the role of nerve grafting and/or nerve transfers. Interview transcripts were coded by 2 researchers. We performed inductive thematic analysis to collate these codes into themes, focusing on the role of brachial plexus exploration in the treatment of BPI.

RESULTS

Most surgeons routinely explore the supraclavicular brachial plexus in situations of pan-plexus and upper trunk injuries. Reasons to explore included the importance of obtaining a definitive root level diagnosis, perceived availability of donor nerve roots, timing of anticipated recovery, plans for distal reconstruction, and the potential for neurolysis. Very few explore lower trunk injuries, citing concern with technical difficulty and unfavorable risk-benefit profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that supraclavicular exploration remains a foundational component of surgical management of BPI, despite increasing utilization of distal nerve transfers. Availability of abundant donor axons and establishing an accurate diagnosis were cited as primary reasons in support of exploration. This analysis of surgeon interviews characterizes contemporary practices regarding the role of brachial plexus exploration in the treatment of BPI.

Traumatic brachial plexus injury: diagnosis and treatment

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) are devastating life-altering events, with pervasive detrimental effects on a patient's physical, psychosocial, mental, and financial well-being. This review provides an understanding of the clinical evaluation, surgical indications, and available reconstructive options to allow for the best possible functional outcomes for patients with BPI.

RECENT FINDINGS

The successful management of patients with BPI requires a multidisciplinary team approach including peripheral nerve surgeons, neurology, hand therapy, physical therapy, pain management, social work, and mental health. The initial diagnosis includes a detailed history, comprehensive physical examination, and critical review of imaging and electrodiagnostic studies. Surgical reconstruction depends on the timing of presentation and specific injury pattern. A full spectrum of techniques including neurolysis, nerve grafting, nerve transfers, free functional muscle transfers, tendon transfers, and joint arthrodesis are utilized.

SUMMARY

Despite the devastating nature of BPI injuries, comprehensive care within a multidisciplinary team, open and practical discussions with patients about realistic expectations, and thoughtful reconstructive planning can provide patients with meaningful recovery.

What is the Elbow Flexion Strength After Free Functional Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Adult Traumatic Complete Brachial Plexus Injuries?

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) in the nerve roots of C5 to T1 lead to the devastating loss of motor and sensory function in the upper extremity. Free functional gracilis muscle transfer (FFMT) is used to reconstruct elbow and shoulder function in adults with traumatic complete BPIs. The question is whether the gains in ROM and functionality for the patient outweigh the risks of such a large intervention to justify this surgery in these patients.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) After FFMT for adult traumatic complete BPI, what is the functional recovery in terms of elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and wrist extension (ROM and muscle grade)? (2) Does the choice of distal insertion affect the functional recovery of the elbow, shoulder, and wrist? (3) Does the choice of nerve source affect elbow flexion and shoulder abduction recovery? (4) What factors are associated with less residual disability? (5) What proportion of flaps have necrosis and do not reinnervate?

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital in Surabaya, Indonesia. A total of 180 patients with traumatic BPIs were treated with FFMT between 2010 and 2020, performed by a senior orthopaedic hand surgeon with 14 years of experience in FFMT. We included patients with traumatic complete C5 to T1 BPIs who underwent a gracilis FFMT procedure. Indications were total avulsion injuries and delayed presentation (>6 months after trauma) or after failed primary nerve transfers (>12 months). Patients with less than 12 months of follow-up were excluded, leaving 130 patients eligible for this study. The median postoperative follow-up period was 47 months (interquartile range [IQR] 33 to 66 months). Most were men (86%; 112 of 130) who had motorcycle collisions (96%; 125 patients) and a median age of 23 years (IQR 19 to 34 years). Orthopaedic surgeons and residents measured joint function at the elbow (flexion), shoulder (abduction), and wrist (extension) in terms of British Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength scores and active ROM. A univariate analysis of variance test was used to evaluate these outcomes in terms of differences in distal attachment to the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB), extensor digitorum communis and extensor pollicis longus (EDC/EPL), the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus (FDP/FPL), and the choice of a phrenic, accessory, or intercostal nerve source. We measured postoperative function with the DASH score and pain at rest with the VAS score. A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to investigate what patient and injury factors were associated with less disability. Complications such as flap necrosis, innervation problems, infections, and reoperations were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median elbow flexion muscle strength was 3 (IQR 3 to 4) and active ROM was 88° ± 46°. The median shoulder abduction grade was 3 (IQR 2 to 4) and active ROM was 62° ± 42°. However, the choice of distal insertion was not associated with differences in the median wrist extension strength (ECRB: 2 [IQR 0 to 3], EDC/EPL: 2 [IQR 0 to 3], FDP/FPL: 1 [IQR 0 to 2]; p = 0.44) or in ROM (ECRB: 21° ± 19°, EDC/EPL: 21° ± 14°, FDP/FPL: 13° ± 15°; p = 0.69). Furthermore, the choice of nerve source did not affect the mean ROM for elbow flexion (phrenic nerve: 87° ± 46°; accessory nerve: 106° ± 49°; intercostal nerves: 103° ± 50°; p = 0.55). No associations were found with less disability (lower DASH scores): young age (coefficient = 0.28; 95% CI -0.22 to 0.79; p = 0.27), being a woman (coefficient = -9.4; 95% CI -24 to 5.3; p = 0.20), and more postoperative months (coefficient = 0.02; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.05]; p = 0.13). The mean postoperative VAS score for pain at rest was 3 ± 2. Flap necrosis occurred in 5% (seven of 130) of all patients, and failed innervation of the gracilis muscle occurred in 4% (five patients).

CONCLUSION

FFMT achieves ROM with fair-to-good muscle power of elbow flexion, shoulder abduction, and overall function for the patient, but does not achieve good wrist function. Meticulous microsurgical skills and extensive rehabilitation training are needed to maximize the result of FFMT. Further technical developments in distal attachment and additional nerve procedures will pave the way for reconstructing a functional limb in patients with a flail upper extremity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Nerve Transfers for Elbow Reconstruction in Upper and Extended Upper-Type Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Nerve transfers for elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries have been used with increasing frequency because of the higher rate of success and acceptable morbidity. This is especially true in upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries.

OBJECTIVE

To present the clinical outcomes of nerve transfers for elbow flexion in patients with upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review was done on all patients with upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries from 2006 to 2017, who underwent nerve transfers for the restoration of elbow flexion. Outcome variables include Filipino version of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (FIL-DASH) score, elbow flexion strength and range of motion, and pain. All statistical significance was set at P &lt; .05.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients with nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion were included. There was a significant improvement in FIL-DASH scores in 28 patients after the nerve transfer procedure. Patients with C56 nerve root injuries and those with more than 2 years' follow-up have a higher percentage of regaining ≥M4 elbow flexion strength. Those with double nerve transfers had a higher percentage of ≥M4 elbow flexion strength, greater range of elbow flexion, and better FIL-DASH scores compared with single nerve transfers, but this did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Nerve transfer procedures improve FIL-DASH scores in upper and upper-type brachial plexus injuries. After nerve transfer, stronger elbow flexion can be expected in patients with C56 injuries, and those with longer follow-up.

Reverse End-to-Side (Supercharging) Nerve Transfer: Conceptualization, Validation, and Translation

Partial nerve recovery either after expectant observation following an injury in-continuity or after nerve repair is not an uncommon occurrence. Historically, treatment strategies in these situations-late repair, revision repair, or acceptance of a mediocre result-were unsatisfying. The reverse end-to-side, or supercharging, nerve transfer was conceived to offer a more palatable option. Partially validated primarily through small animal research, supercharging has been rapidly translated to clinical practice. Many have extended the indications beyond the original intent, though the final place of this technique in the peripheral nerve surgeon's armamentarium is still yet to be determined.

The Split Hypoglossal Nerve and Cross-Face Nerve Graft for Dual Innervation of the Functional Muscle Transfer in Facial Reanimation

Facial paralysis is a disabling deformity. The affected individual is seriously affected both esthetically and functionally. Free functional muscle transfer is currently the corner stone in the management of long-standing facial nerve paralysis. Several nerve options are available to supply the free muscle transfer. These nerves can be used alone or in combination. The aim of this work is to study the possibility and results of dually innervating the free functioning muscle transfer. The dual innervation is done using the split hypoglossal nerve and cross-face nerve graft (CFNG) both sutured in an end-to-end manner to the nerve to gracilis. Twenty-nine patients with unilateral long-standing facial nerve paralysis (more than 1 y) were treated using free gracilis muscle transfer dually supplied by the split hypoglossal nerve and CFNG, both sutured in an end-to-end manner. The gained excursion after the free gracilis transfer was 9 to 29 mm (mean: 17.24 mm). A statistically significant increase ( P -value=0.0001) in the distance from where the midline crosses the lower vermilion border to commissure occurred from preoperative (mean: 16.55 mm) to postoperative setting (mean: 33.79 mm). Spontaneity was achieved in 26 patients (89.6%). In conclusion, dual innervation of the free muscle transfer using both the split hypoglossal nerve and CFNG (both sutured in an end-to-end manner to the nerve to gracilis) is a good possible option to treat long-standing cases of facial nerve paralysis. It yields adequate muscle excursion with acceptable spontaneity.

Evaluation of functional recovery in the intrinsic and flexor muscles after nerve transfer for ulnar nerve lesion. A new measurement method: The Cha method

"Supercharge" end-to-side (SETS) nerve transfer for lesions of the proximal ulnar nerve is a recognized novel option, but improvement in motor function after surgery has not been properly evaluated. We therefore propose a modified method for quantitative evaluation of improvement in the intrinsic hand strength. We screened 216 patients with proximal ulnar nerve lesions who presented to our outpatient department from 2012 to 2020. Of these, 101 met our inclusion/exclusion criteria and were evaluated just before surgery. We used a novel method to measure finger abduction ("2nd-abd"), adduction ("5th-add"), and ring and little finger flexion strength ("4,5 grip"), and analyzed correlations with established pinch strength data. The male:female sex ratio was 86:15, and the ratio dominant to nondominant arm involvement was 68:33. All strength measurements were analyzed as percentage affected to contralateral normal side. On Pearson correlation analysis, the strength ratios for "4,5 grip", "2nd-abd", and "5th-add", but not "5 fingers (total) grip", showed significant positive correlation with key and oppositional pinch strength (all p &lt; 0.001). Additionally, linear regression analysis showed identical results for each strength correlation with key/oppositional pinch, except for "5 fingers total) grip" (all, p &lt; 0.001). SETS is a reasonable alternative for lesions of the proximal ulnar nerve. The measurement method we propose is feasible for specific assessment of intrinsic muscle strength, which improves after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, level IV.

Clinical Assessment of Functional Recovery Following Nerve Transfer for Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries

Surgical reconstruction and postoperative rehabilitation are both important for restoring function in patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs). The current study aimed to understand variations in recovery progression among patients with different injury levels after receiving the nerve transfer methods. A total of 26 patients with BPIs participated in a rehabilitation training program over 6 months after nerve reconstruction. The differences between the first and second evaluations and between C5-C6 and C5-C7 BPIs were compared. Results showed significant improvements in elbow flexion range (p = 0.001), British Medical Research Council's score of shoulder flexion (p = 0.046), shoulder abduction (p = 0.013), shoulder external rotation (p = 0.020), quantitative muscle strength, and grip strength at the second evaluation for both groups. C5-C6 BPIs patients showed a larger shoulder flexion range (p = 0.022) and greater strength of the shoulder rotator (p = 0.004), elbow flexor (p = 0.028), elbow extensor (p = 0.041), wrist extensor (p = 0.001), and grip force (p = 0.045) than C5-C7 BPIs patients at the second evaluation. Our results indicated different improvements among patients according to injury levels, with quantitative values assisting in establishing goals for interventions.

Corneal Neurotization Using the Great Auricular Nerve for Bilateral Congenital Trigeminal Anesthesia

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe an indirect corneal neurotization (CN) technique for congenital bilateral trigeminal anesthesia using the greater auricular nerve (GAN) as a donor.

METHOD

CN was performed to preserve the integrity of the only seeing eye in a 4-year-old boy with pontine tegmental cap dysplasia and bilateral trigeminal anesthesia. He had recurrent corneal ulceration and scarring despite full medical treatment. The GAN was used as a donor, and the sural nerve was harvested and used as a bridge which was tunneled to the sub-Tenon space in the inferior fornix. The fascicles were distributed into the 4 quadrants and sutured to the sclera near the limbus.

RESULT

This technique resulted in providing corneal sensation and improving stability of the epithelium. Corneal opacity gradually decreased allowing significant visual improvement evidenced in the early postoperative months.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the GAN technique for CN bypasses trigeminal innervation and has the potential to improve corneal sensation. The GAN is a large caliber nerve and provides a large amount of axons and robust neurotization. This technique would be desirable for cases with bilateral congenital trigeminal anesthesia, such as pontine tegmental cap dysplasia.

Sensorimotor Outcomes of Upper Extremity End-to-Side Nerve Transfers: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

End-to-side nerve transfer (ETSNT) for treatment of peripheral nerve injuries is controversial given the myriad anatomic locations, injury types, and indications. Efficacy of ETSNT remains debated. We hypothesized differences in age, sex, transfer location, and time to surgery influence outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a search of the PubMed database for ETSNT in the upper extremity from 1988 to 2018. Age, sex, transfer location, time to surgery, donor and recipient axons, and strength and sensation outcomes as measured by Medical Research Council scale were extracted from articles. Meaningful recovery was classified as Medical Research Council Grade 3 or greater. Association between meaningful recovery and younger (<25) and older (≥25) patients, injury mechanism, sex, transfer location, donor axons, and recipient axons were calculated using a χ 2 or Fisher exact test. A logistic mixed effect model was used with time to surgery, age (categorical), transfer location, and injury type as a fixed effect, and a random paper effect was included to account for correlation among patients from the same paper.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen patients from 11 studies were included. Neither age (continuous variable, P = 0.68) nor time to surgery ( P = 0.28) affected meaningful recovery. Injury mechanism, sex, and younger age (<25 vs ≥25 years) were not associated with meaningful recovery. Within the brachial plexus ETSNT demonstrated median M4 ± 1 postoperative strength, with trunks/cords as the primary axon donor ( P = 0.03). The musculocutaneous nerve demonstrated promising but variable results in 31 patients with median strength M3 ± 4. Digital nerves consistently demonstrated meaningful sensory recovery as both donor and recipient axons (15 of 15, 100%). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that odds of meaningful recovery after ETSNT are significantly greater for transfers within the brachial plexus compared with the distal arm (odds ratio, 41.9; 95% CI, 1.1-1586.7, P = 0.04), but location does not significantly affect meaningful recovery ( P = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing ETSNT for digital nerve injury demonstrated meaningful recovery. End-to-side nerve transfer seems to be more efficacious when performed within the brachial plexus. This study did not find sex, injury mechanism, or time to surgery to significantly affect meaningful recovery. Additional study is needed to better evaluate the effectiveness of ETSNT in the upper extremity.

[The combination of nerve and tendon transfers offers good possibilities for hand function in patients with cervical spinal cord injury]

Regaining upper extremity function is a prioritized matter for patients with tetraplegia after a cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI). The purpose of this article is to describe the current evidence and treatment strategies for upper extremity reconstruction after cSCI at the Centre for Advanced Reconstruction of Extremities, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden. The specialized unit works in a multidisciplinary setting to optimize the care of the patient population. Preoperative planning and an individualized treatment according to the needs and abilities of the patient are considered key points to achieve the best possible outcome. The addition of nerve transfers to the established method of tendon transfers for grip reconstruction has led to increased possibilities to achieve both functional hand opening and grip. Here we present our preferred method of upper extremity reconstruction, which involves a two-staged procedure where the tendon-based grip reconstruction is preceded by nerve transfer of the supinator to posterior intraosseous nerve whenever possible. Important clinical aspects as well as future perspectives are discussed.

Reconstruction of C5-C8 (T1 Hand) Brachial Plexus Paralysis in a Series of 52 Patients

PURPOSE

A C5-C8 brachial plexus root injury, also known as a T1 hand, is associated with paralysis of shoulder abduction or external rotation and elbow flexion, accompanied by variable elbow, wrist, thumb, or finger extension deficits. We report the results of reconstruction for C5-C8 brachial plexus paralysis in 52 patients operated upon within 12 months of injury and having at least 24 months of follow-up.

METHODS

We considered surgery to be indicated if, by the fifth month after trauma, shoulder abduction and external rotation and elbow flexion remained paralyzed. Root grafting was possible in 35% of the patients and was performed concomitantly with nerve transfers. Shoulder motion was reconstructed by transferring the spinal accessory to the suprascapular nerve. Elbow flexion was restored by transferring fascicles from either the median or ulnar nerve to the biceps motor branch. When needed, elbow extension was reconstructed by transferring 1 motor branch of the flexor carpi ulnaris to the triceps lower medial head motor branch. Wrist extension was restored by transferring the distal anterior interosseous nerve to the extensor carpi radialis brevis motor branch.

RESULTS

Within 12 months of injury, we observed preserved or spontaneous recovery of elbow, wrist, finger, and thumb extension in 25%, 12%, 50%, and 68% of patients, respectively. After surgical reconstruction, improved range of motion for shoulder, elbow flexion, and wrist extension scoring at least M3 was present in 90% of our patients. All 10 patients in whom a motor branch of the flexor carpi ulnaris was used for triceps reconstruction recovered elbow extension, while flexor carpi ulnaris function was preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

In approximatively 90% of our patients, distal nerve transfers resulted in functional recovery of shoulder abduction, elbow flexion or extension, and wrist extension.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.