Pharmacokinetics of once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected subjects: comparison with the standard twice-daily regimen

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and safety of two once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/RTV) regimens, 1600/100 and 2000/100 mg, in HIV-positive patients.

METHODS

Eighteen HIV-infected adults treated with the standard twice-daily SQV/RTV 1000/100 mg regimen were enrolled in this open-label, two-phase, crossover pharmacokinetic study. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of SQV administered with 100 mg RTV were investigated following once-daily doses of 1600 mg or 2000 mg or a twice-daily dose of 1000 mg. Plasma drug concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental model.

RESULTS

Compared with SQV 1000 mg twice daily, the Cmax of SQV following a 1600 mg and 2000 mg dose increased in a dose-proportional manner [geometric mean (95% CI) 1915 (1656-2850) ng/ml for 1000 mg, 2782 (2249-4330) ng/ml for 1600 mg and 4179 (3429-6105) ng/ml for 2000 mg doses, respectively]. SQV Ctrough values were 539 (453-1011), 106 (76-223) and 231 (75-822) ng/ml, respectively. A SQV Ctrough value greater than 100 ng/ml was achieved in all subjects on the twice-daily regimen, in 9/18 (50%) subjects on the 1600/100 mg once-daily regimen, and in 14/17 (82%) subjects on the 2000/100 mg once-daily regimen. The once-daily regimens were well tolerated, with mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal symptoms being the only events reported by a small number of patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of once-daily SQV/RTV 2000/100 mg in HIV-infected subjects. Our findings suggest that this regimen may be an alternative to twice-daily 1000/100 mg doses and should be further evaluated in efficacy studies. The data indicate that most patients (14/17) on once-daily 2000/100 mg achieve trough concentrations above target values (determined for HIV wild-type) for efficacy of SQV with the use of just 100 mg RTV/day and with good tolerability.

Efficacy of two modalities of triple HIV therapy: probable superiority of indinavir

The introduction of the so-called highly active antiretroviral therapies has had an impact on the natural history of the HIV infection. The aim of this contribution is to assess the differences in terms of plasma viral load (VL), as a reflection of therapy success or failure. A retrospective study was made of the changes in VL in two cohorts of patients depending on the drugs included in the triple therapy prescribed to them. The comparison of the triple therapies containing any reverse transcriptase inhibitor and different protease inhibitors, indinavir (IDV) (239 patients) versus saquinavir (SQV) or ritonavir (RTV) (138 subjects), showed a significantly higher percentage of patients reaching a 'non-detectable' VL among those receiving indinavir (67.8% versus 54.3%; P = 0.011). The interval before VL levels rose above 30,000 RNA copies/ml was different in the two groups: 385 days (276-495 days) for therapies including indinavir, and 239 days (86-391 days) for saquinavir or ritonavir. This seems to support the excellent behaviour of indinavir when its efficiency is compared with other protease inhibitors acting as potential competitors.

Once-daily dosing of saquinavir soft-gel capsules and ritonavir combination in HIV-1-infected patients (IMEA015 study)

This was a prospective pilot study evaluating a saquinavir (SQV) soft-gel capsules (SGC)/ritonavir (RTV)-containing once-daily regimen over a follow-up of 3 months. The primary end-point was to determine the number of patients both remaining on treatment at month 3 and with trough SQV plasma concentration 24 h after the last intake (C24h) exceeding the inhibition of 95% of viral replication in vitro (IC95). The secondary end-points were to investigate the immuno-virological efficacy and safety of SQV-SGC/RTV once daily, and to explore SQV concentrations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Twenty-three antiretroviral-naive and 17 protease inhibitors (PIs) experienced HIV-1-infected patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA level below 200 copies/ml were enrolled. They were assigned to SQV-SGC/RTV (1600/100 mg once daily) combined with nucleoside and/or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. In a subgroup of 13 patients, both plasma and intracellular SQV concentrations were determined. By intent to treat analysis the percentage of success at month 3 was 87.5% (confidence interval: 73.2-95.8%) with 78.3% in naive and 100% in PI-experienced patients. SQV C24h and intracellular concentrations [median (range, n)] were 241 ng/ml (40-1209, 35) and 323 ng/ml (168-475, 12), respectively. Intracellular concentrations showed an accumulation of SQV in PBMCs persisting during 24 h. Neither immunological nor virological failure was observed. Clinical and biological tolerance was acceptable in all patients but three with adverse effects leading to discontinuation. These data confirmed the short-term efficacy of SQV-SGC/RTV once-daily regimen based on SQV therapeutic drug monitoring.

Sex‐Based Differences in Saquinavir Pharmacology and Virologic Response in AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 359

AIDS Clinical Trials Group study 359 was a controlled study of saquinavir with either ritonavir or nelfinavir, together with delavirdine, adefovir, or both, in indinavir-experienced persons. Saquinavir was common in all study arms, and the study investigated relationships among characteristics of patients, saquinavir area under the curve (AUC) and trough concentrations (C(min)), and virologic response. Concentrations of saquinavir were higher when it was combined with ritonavir than when it was combined with nelfinavir and were lower with adefovir-containing regimens. Females had higher AUC and C(min) values than did males. Higher saquinavir AUC and C(min) values were associated with a greater likelihood of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA levels </=500 copies/mL (P=.008) and were better predictors of response than was the saquinavir inhibitory quotient. Males had a lower probability of having HIV RNA levels </=500 copies/mL at week 16 than did females (28% vs. 42%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.43). In this study, a greater proportion of females had HIV RNA levels </=500 copies/mL than did males, which can be attributed to higher concentrations of saquinavir in females than in males.

Pharmacokinetics of saquinavir plus low-dose ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected pregnant women

The physiologic changes that occur during pregnancy make it difficult to predict antiretroviral pharmacokinetics (PKs), but few data exist on the PKs of protease inhibitors in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected pregnant women. The objective of the present study was to determine the PKs of ritonavir (RTV)-enhanced saquinavir (SQV) in HIV-infected pregnant women by an area under the curve (AUC)-targeted approach. A phase I, formal PK evaluation was conducted with HIV-infected pregnant woman during gestation, during labor and delivery, and at 6 weeks postpartum. The SQV-RTV regimen was 800/100 mg twice a day (b.i.d.), and nucleoside analogs were administered concomitantly. The SQV exposure targeted was an AUC at 24 h of 10,000 ng. h/ml. Participants were evaluated for 12-h steady-state PKs at each time period. Thirteen subjects completed the PK evaluations during gestation, 7 completed the PK evaluations at labor and delivery, and 12 completed the PK evaluations postpartum. The mean baseline weight was 67.4 kg, and the median length of gestation was 23.3 weeks. All subjects achieved SQV exposures in excess of the target AUC. The SQV AUCs at 12 h (AUC(12)s) during gestation (29,373 +/- 17,524 ng. h/ml [mean +/- standard deviation]), during labor and delivery (26,189 +/- 22,138 ng. h/ml), and during the postpartum period (35,376 +/- 26,379 ng. h/ml) were not significantly different. The mean values of the PK parameters for RTV were lower during gestation than during the postpartum period: for AUC(12), 7,811 and 13,127 ng. h/ml, respectively; for trough concentrations, 376 and 632 ng/ml, respectively; and for maximum concentrations, 1,256 and 2,252 ng/ml, respectively (P </= 0.05 for all comparisons). This is the first formal PK evaluation of a dual protease inhibitor regimen with HIV-infected pregnant women. The level of SQV exposure was sufficient at each time of evaluation. These data demonstrate large variability in SQV and RTV concentrations and suggest that RTV concentrations are altered by pregnancy. These PK results suggest that SQV-RTV at 800/100 mg b.i.d. appears to be a reasonable treatment option for this population.

Once-daily saquinavir and ritonavir in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected individuals

To assess the efficacy of 48 weeks' treatment with saquinavir 1600 mg and ritonavir 100 mg, both given once daily (SQVOD), in drug-experienced HIV-infected patients, a SQVOD-based therapy was offered to 100 treatment-experienced patients via their own physicians. The patients starting this regimen were followed up for 48 weeks. HIV-RNA was assessed by means of NASBA (limit of quantification = 80 copies/mL). Fifteen patients received the SQVOD-based therapy. Six discontinued before week 48 because of failure, toxicity or intolerance due to the high pill burden and gastrointestinal side effects. The median baseline CD4+ cell counts and plasma HIV-RNA levels were 317 cells/microL (range 44-698) and 4.18 log copies/mL (range 2.65-6.18). At week 4, there was a mean decrease of 1.96 log copies/mL (P < 0.0001) in HIV-RNA, with 75% of the patients having fewer than 400 copies/mL; seven of the nine patients treated for 48 weeks reached fewer than 400 copies/mL. No substantial change in cholesterol or triglyceride values was observed over 48 weeks. As this SQVOD-based regimen had considerable short-term virologic activity in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients, it may be a reasonable option when non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors cannot be administered and once-daily dosing is preferred by the patient. However, the high pill burden and frequent gastrointestinal side effects of the soft gel capsule formulation of saquinavir may limit its long-term efficacy.

A randomized trial comparing initial HAART regimens of nelfinavir/nevirapine and ritonavir/saquinavir in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

A triple-class HAART regimen may be associated with a better virological effect than conventional regimens, but may also lead to toxicity and more profound resistance.

METHODS

Randomized, controlled, open-label trial of 233 protease inhibitor- and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naive HIV-infected patients allocated to a regimen of nelfinavir and nevirapine (1250/200 mg twice daily; n = 118) or ritonavir and saquinavir (400/400 mg twice daily; n = 115), both in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The primary end-point was HIV RNA < or = 20 copies/ml after 48 weeks (missing value = failure). Patients remained under follow-up also in case of switch from the randomized therapy.

RESULTS

At baseline, the median CD4 cell counts were 126 (range: 0-942) (nelfinavir/nevirapine) and 150 (0-642) (ritonavir/saquinavir) cells/mm3, and HIV RNA measurements 5.0 copies/ml (1.3-6.4) in both groups. A total of 102 (86%) and 101 (88%) were antiretroviral-naive. 44% discontinued randomized therapy; P = 0.13. Of these, 80 and 73% switched therapy due to adverse events; P = 0.99. At week 48, 69 and 56%, respectively, had a HIV RNA < or = 20 copies/ml; P = 0.037.

CONCLUSION

A regimen of nelfinavir/nevirapine had a favourable virological effect and tolerability over a 48-week period compared with ritonavir/saquinavir, when administered in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. However, more extensive follow-up is required to determine the long-term consequences of triple class HAART regimens, including the development of broad drug resistance.

Failures of 1 week on, 1 week off antiretroviral therapies in a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Scheduled treatment interruptions are being evaluated in an effort to decrease costs and side effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). A schedule of 1 week on and 1 week off therapy offers the promise of 50% less drug exposure with continuously undetectable HIV RNA concentration.

METHODS

In the Staccato study 600 patients on successful HAART were to be randomized to either continued therapy, CD4-guided therapy, or one week on, one week off therapy. A scheduled preliminary analysis evaluated effectiveness in the 1-week-on-1-week-off arm.

RESULTS

Of 36 evaluable patients, 19 (53%) had two successive HIV RNA concentrations > 500 copies/ml at the end of the week off therapy, and were classified as virological failure. Most of those who failed took didanosine, stavudine, saquinavir, and ritonavir (11 patients). In these patients, there was no evidence of mutations suggestive of drug resistance, and plasma saquinavir levels were within the expected range. Two of three patients failing on triple nucleotides had drug resistance mutations, but nonetheless responded to reintroduction of triple nucleotide therapy. One of two patients taking nevirapine, and one of eight taking efavirenz, also failed. Both had resistance mutations at the time of failure, but not at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The 1-week-on-1-week-off schedule, as tested in the Staccato study, showed an unacceptably high failure rate and was therefore terminated.

Low efficacy and high frequency of adverse events in a randomized trial of the triple nucleoside regimen abacavir, stavudine and didanosine

BACKGROUND

Highly active antiretroviral therapy containing three nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors has been somewhat successful, but the clinical efficacy is unclear.

METHODS

Randomized, controlled, open-label trial of 180 antiretroviral drug-naive HIV-infected patients allocated to a regimen of abacavir, stavudine and didanosine (A/S/D, n = 60), ritonavir and saquinavir (R/S 400/400 mg twice daily; n = 60) or nelfinavir and nevirapine (N/N 1250/200 mg twice daily; n = 60); the latter two in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine. The primary endpoint was HIV plasma RNA < or = 20 copies/ml after 48 weeks.

RESULTS

At baseline, the median CD4 cell count was 161 x 106 cells/l (range, 0-920) and the HIV RNA was 5.0 log10 copies/ml (range, 2.7-6.7). At 48 weeks, 43% in the A/S/D arm had a HIV RNA < or = 20 copies/ml, compared with 69% in the N/N arm (P < 0.01) and 62% in the R/S arm (P < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, the A/S/D arm had an odds ratio of obtaining a viral load of < or = 20 copies/ml at week 48 of 0.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10-0.59] versus N/N and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.33-0.83) versus R/S. The A/S/D arm had a particularly poor outcome in patients with higher viral load and AIDS at baseline: 63% had to discontinue A/S/D (any drug). Side effects were more frequent in the A/S/D arm and included neuropathy 27%, suspicion of hypersensitivity 12%, and increase in lactate accompanied by systemic symptoms 8%.

CONCLUSION

The A/S/D regimen had a low efficacy and a high frequency of adverse events and cannot be recommended.

Saquinavir: a review of its use in boosted regimens for treating HIV infection

Protease inhibitor boosting involves concurrent administration of a protease inhibitor, such as saquinavir, plus a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, usually ritonavir in subtherapeutic doses. Since protease inhibitors are extensively metabolised by CYP3A4, this results in a marked increase in systemic exposure of saquinavir or other protease inhibitors boosted by ritonavir. As with traditional protease inhibitor regimens, boosted regimens are typically used in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). In protease inhibitor-experienced and -naive patients with HIV infection, twice-daily and once-daily boosted saquinavir regimens achieved good rates of viral suppression, improved CD4+ cell counts and were generally well tolerated in clinical trials. Encouraging results have also been reported in a number of small studies in heavily pretreated HIV-infected patients who received salvage therapy comprising double-boosted regimens of saquinavir plus lopinavir with subtherapeutic doses of ritonavir, along with other agents. The largest clinical trials have been multicentre, randomised comparisons of twice-daily boosted saquinavir versus twice-daily boosted indinavir (MaxCmin1) or lopinavir (MaxCmin2) regimens. In the MaxCmin1 study, >90% of patients in both groups had an undetectable viral load (<400 copies/mL) after 48 weeks of therapy in the on-treatment analysis. However, viral suppression was achieved in significantly more saquinavir than indinavir recipients in the intention-to-treat analysis, which appeared to be due to the significantly greater percentage of patients in the indinavir group who switched from randomised therapy because of adverse events. Interim 24-week results of the MaxCmin2 trial indicate that 90% of patients in both groups combined had plasma HIV RNA levels <400 copies/mL; final results at 48 weeks will report data separately for the boosted regimens of saquinavir and lopinavir.

CONCLUSION

Boosted protease inhibitor regimens (including two NRTIs) are recommended as a first-line option in current HIV treatment guidelines and are used extensively in clinical practice. The convenient administration schedule and good pharmacokinetic profile associated with boosted saquinavir regimens have the potential to increase adherence to therapy and improve antiretroviral effects through increased drug exposure. Twice-daily boosted saquinavir is one of the most extensively evaluated boosted protease inhibitor regimens and has been shown to have good efficacy on surrogate markers of HIV disease as well as significant tolerability advantages over boosted indinavir. Once-daily boosted saquinavir regimens may be most suitable for HIV-infected patients with busy lifestyles and those who would benefit from directly observed therapy.

Contraindicated antiretroviral drug combinations

The proper implementation of combination antiretroviral treatment regimens is fundamental to successful therapeutic outcomes for patients with HIV/AIDS. Unfortunately, some patients are still being prescribed contraindicated antiretroviral regimens that include: 1. stavudine plus zidovudine; 2. Invirase plus two nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIS); 3. zalcitabine plus didanosine; 4. zalcitabine plus stavudine; and, 5. zalcitabine plus lamivudine. Inappropriate regimens such as these either have limited effectiveness or potential severe toxicity.

Randomized trial to evaluate indinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients: the MaxCmin1 Trial

This trial assessed the rate of virological failure at 48 weeks in adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected patients assigned indinavir/ritonavir (Idv/Rtv; 800/100 mg 2 times daily) or saquinavir/ritonavir (Sqv/Rtv; 1000/100 mg 2 times daily) in an open-label, randomized (1:1), multicenter, phase 4 design. Three hundred six patients began the assigned treatment. At 48 weeks, virological failure was seen in 43 (27%) of 158 and 37 (25%) of 148 patients in the Idv/Rtv and Sqv/Rtv arms, respectively. The time to virological failure did not differ between study arms (P=.76). When switching from randomized treatment was counted as failure, this was seen in 78 of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 51 of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P=.009). A switch from the randomized treatment occurred in 64 (41%) of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 40 (27%) of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P=.013). Sixty-four percent of the switches occurred because of adverse events. A greater number of treatment-limiting adverse events were observed in the Idv/Rtv arm, relative to the Sqv/Rtv arm. In conclusion, Rtv-boosed Sqv and Idv were found to have comparable antiretroviral effects in the doses studied.

A review of low-dose ritonavir in protease inhibitor combination therapy

The pharmacokinetics of protease inhibitors center around the microsomal enzyme cytochrome P-450 3A4. As a potent inhibitor of this enzyme, ritonavir can increase the bioavailability and half-life of coadministered protease inhibitors. Evidence suggests that increased exposure to protease inhibitors is clinically relevant. Antiretroviral treatment with low-dose ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, indinavir, and saquinavir has durable virological activity and shows impressive immune reconstitution. Although tolerable in most cases, gastrointestinal side effects, hepatotoxicity, and blood lipid abnormalities remain relevant issues. Additional study will elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of twice-daily, low-dose ritonavir-boosted regimens and determine whether once-daily regimens based on this principle will have a lasting role in clinical practice.

[Comparison of pharmacokinetics of saquinavir soft-gel capsule (SQV-SGC) combined with ritonavir (RTV), SQV hard-gel capsule with RTV, and SQV-SGC alone]

Saquinavir (SQV) is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) specific protease inhibitor. When combined with ritonavir (RTV), plasma concentration of SQV is increased. In this study, we examined pharmacokinetics of SQV soft-gel capsule (SQV-SGC) 400 mg twice daily (BID) combined with RTV in HIV-1-infected patients (n = 4) and compared with those of SQV hard-gel capsule (SQV-HGC) 400 mg BID combined with RTV (n = 12). Pharmacokinetics of SQV-SGC 1,200 mg single dose in healthy subjects (n = 10) were also studied. Peak SQV concentration in plasma (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 hour (AUC0-8 h) of SQV-SGC 400 mg BID combined with RTV group were higher than those of SQV-HGC 400 mg BID combined with RTV group; increase of 14.7% and 25.5%, respectively. Cmax and AUC0-8 h of SQV-SGC were higher than SQV-SGC 1,200 mg single dose group; increase of 3.9 fold and 8.5 fold, respectively. These results indicated that SQV-SGC combined with RTV therapy is the most potent antiviral effect among SQV-SGC with RTV, SQV-HGC with RTV, and SQV-SGC alone.

Pharmacokinetics of lower doses of saquinavir soft-gel caps (800 and 1200 mg twice daily) boosted with itraconazole in HIV-1-positive patients

OBJECTIVE

The pharmacokinetics of 800 mg and 1200 mg of saquinavir soft-gel caps (SQV-SGC) twice daily plus 100 mg itraconazole once daily were compared to 1400 mg SQV-SGC twice daily without itraconazole.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetics of SQV were determined in 17 randomly selected patients on 1400 mg twice daily SQV-SGC without itraconazole and after 2 weeks with lower SQV-SGC doses plus itraconazole. SQV plasma concentrations were determined by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by a non-compartmental model.

RESULTS

Median (+IQR) area under plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC0-12h) were 3.33 (1.96-7.34), 4.29 (3.14-7.67) and 4.07 (2.76-4.49) mg/l x h for SQV 1400 mg without itraconazole, SQV 1200 mg with itraconazole and SQV 800 mg with itraconazole, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. The median Cmin was above the proposed minimum effective concentration of 0.05 mg/l for all three regimens.

CONCLUSION

SQV-SGC 800 mg or 1200 mg twice daily boosted with 100 mg of itraconazole once daily resulted in adequate SQV pharmacokinetics not significantly different from SQV-SGC 1400 mg twice daily.