A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Trial of Gabapentin and Phenobarbital in the Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal

Gabapentin was compared with phenobarbital for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal in a randomized, open-label, controlled trial in 27 inpatients. There were no significant differences in the proportion of treatment completers between treatment groups or the proportion of patients in each group requiring rescue medication for breakthrough signs and symptoms of alcohol withdrawal. There were no significant treatment differences in withdrawal symptoms or psychological distress, nor were there serious adverse events. These findings suggest that gabapentin may be as effective as phenobarbital in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal. Given gabapentin's favorable pharmacokinetic profile, further study of its effectiveness in treating alcohol withdrawal is warranted.

Vigabatrin vs. carbamazepine monotherapy in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: a randomized response conditional cross-over study

The clinical efficacy and safety of vigabatrin (VGB) as add-on therapy for pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsies is well established. However, for an objective evaluation, the effects of the drug in the monotherapy of newly diagnosed subjects should be determined. With this aim, VGB was compared, in a randomized, response conditional cross-over study, with carbamazepine (CBZ), the most widely prescribed drug in focal epilepsies. Fifty-one patients with complex partial (CP) seizures were randomly assigned to either the VGB or the CBZ group and evaluated after an initial 4 month period. The cross-over to the alternative drug was carried out, for an analogous period, only in cases with persisting seizures or in the presence of intolerable side effects. Patients who did not respond to either drug were subsequently treated with a combination of VGB and CBZ. No significant difference was revealed in the efficacies of VGB and CBZ; a complete control of seizures was obtained in 17/37 patients (45.9%) treated with VGB and in 20/39 patients (51.3%) treated with CBZ. The side effects were somewhat more frequent (41%) and severe with CBZ than with VGB (21.6%). The power to detect a 20% difference between the two drugs was 75%. The combination of the two drugs suppressed the seizures in 5 out of 14 resistant cases. The preliminary results in this small number of patients are encouraging and suggest that VGB may be considered as a first-line drug for epilepsy with CP seizures and as a valid alternative when other monotherapies are ineffective or poorly tolerated.

Psychotic and severe behavioural reactions with vigabatrin: a review

Behavioural disturbances and psychotic reactions are commoner in patients with epilepsy than in the general population and may be precipitated by the majority of antiepileptic drugs, including the newer ones. These reactions may be more frequent in patients with complex partial seizures, reflecting underlying temporal lobe pathology. A review of the literature on vigabatrin found an incidence of severe abnormal behaviour in controlled trials in adults of 3.4%. In children open studies gave an incidence of around 6%. This may be related to dosage and speed of introduction. Such reactions may be related to changes in seizure control, either unaccustomed good control (force normalisation) or breakdown in control, implying non-specific causative mechanisms. Alternatively, any relationship to control may be fortuitous and specific, unknown pharmacological mechanisms may be involved. Appropriate risk reduction measures include slow introduction, limiting the dose to that required for seizure control, slow withdrawal and increased vigilance in those on polytherapy or with psychiatric histories. Such advice is pertinent to all antiepileptic medications. Additionally, vigabatrin is probably contraindicated in idiopathic generalised epilepsies. Behavioural reactions are uncommon with vigabatrin, and have not been shown to be greater with it than with other antiepileptic agents. Therefore, it maybe inappropriate to withhold the drug from those who may benefit from it.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of pregabalin in older patients with neuropathic pain: results from a pooled analysis of 11 clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Older patients are typically underrepresented in clinical trials of medications for chronic pain. A post hoc analysis of multiple clinical studies of pregabalin in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) or postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in older patients.

METHODS

Data from 11 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies of pregabalin in patients with DPN or PHN were pooled. Efficacy outcomes included change in Daily Pain Rating Scale score, ≥30% and ≥50% responders, and endpoint pain score ≤3. Safety was based on adverse events (AEs). Primary efficacy was analyzed by analysis of covariance with terms for treatment, age category, protocol, baseline pain, and treatment-by-age category interaction.

RESULTS

2516 patients (white, n = 2344 [93.2%]; men, n = 1347 [53.5%]; PHN, n = 1003 [39.9%]; pregabalin, n = 1595) were included in the analysis. Patients were grouped by age: 18 to 64 years (n = 1236), 65 to 74 years (n = 766), and ≥75 years (n = 514). Baseline mean pain and sleep interference scores were comparable across treatment and age groups. Significant improvements in endpoint mean pain were observed for all pregabalin dosages versus placebo in all age groups (p ≤ 0.0009), except for the lowest dosage (150 mg/day) in the youngest age group. Clinically meaningful pain relief, defined as ≥30% and ≥50% pain response, was observed in all age groups. The most common AEs were dizziness, somnolence, peripheral edema, asthenia, dry mouth, weight gain, and infections. The relative risks for these AEs increased with pregabalin dose, but did not appear related to older age or type of neuropathic pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregabalin (150-600 mg/day) significantly reduced pain in older patients (age ≥65 years) with neuropathic pain and improvements in pain were comparable to those observed in younger patients. Titration of pregabalin to the lowest effective dose should allow for effective pain relief while minimizing AEs in older patients with neuropathic pain. Given the common use of polypharmacy in older patients, the absence of known drug-drug interactions makes pregabalin an important treatment option for older patients with pain of neuropathic origin.

A meta-analysis of the preoperative use of gabapentinoids for the treatment of acute postoperative pain following spinal surgery

BACKGROUND

Gabapentinoid drugs, which include gabapentin and pregabalin, play an established role in the management of neuropathic pain. However, whether preoperative administration of gabapentinoids has a beneficial role in controlling acute pain after spinal surgery is unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the efficacy and safety of the preoperative use of gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin) for the treatment of acute postoperative pain following spinal surgery.

METHODS

In March 2017, a systematic computer-based search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google databases. RCTs comparing gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin) with placebo in patients undergoing spine surgery were retrieved. The primary endpoint was the visual analogue scale (VAS) score with rest or mobilization at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours and cumulative morphine consumption at 24 and 48 hours. The secondary outcomes were complications of nausea, vomiting, sedation, dizziness, headache, urine retention, pruritus, and visual disturbances. After tests for publication bias and heterogeneity among studies were performed, data were aggregated for random-effects models when necessary.

RESULTS

Sixteen clinical studies (gabapentin group n = 8 and pregabalin group n = 8) were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. Gabapentinoids were associated with reduced pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours. Similarly, gabapentinoids were associated with a reduction in cumulative morphine consumption at 24 and 48 hours. Furthermore, gabapentinoids can significantly reduce the occurrence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of sedation, dizziness, headache, visual disturbances, somnolence, or urine retention.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative use of gabapentinoids was able to reduce postoperative pain, total morphine consumption, and morphine-related complications following spine surgery. Further studies should determine the optimal dose and whether pregabalin is superior to gabapentin in controlling acute pain after spine surgery.

Double-blind substitution of vigabatrin and valproate in carbamazepine-resistant partial epilepsy. 012 Study group

Patients from 12 countries reporting two or more partial seizures per month despite treatment with optimal doses of CBZ were randomised to additional vigabatrin (VGB, 2-4 g daily) or sodium valproate (VPA, 1-2 g daily) using a double-blind, double-dummy design. The study included a 6 month retrospective baseline on unchanged CBZ dosage, a month's prospective baseline, a short titration phase, and an assessment period lasting 3 months on duotherapy. CBZ was withdrawn over a further 2 months in responders ( > or = 50% monthly seizure reduction compared with baseline), who continued on alternative monotherapy for 3 or more months. If seizure control deteriorated, CBZ was reinstated and these patients were also followed up for 3 months. A total of 215 patients (108 VGB, 107 VPA) reporting a mean of seven partial seizures per month fulfilled the criteria for the intention-to-treat analysis. 53 and 51% of patients in the VGB and VPA group respectively achieved a monthly reduction in seizure numbers > or = 50%, respectively. 27 and 31% maintained alternative monotherapy. Overall, 17% (7% monotherapy, 10% duotherapy) of the VGB treated patients and 19% (8% monotherapy, 11% duotherapy) of the VPA group remained seizure-free during the final 3 month treatment period. VGB and VPA, which increase neuronal inhibition mediated by gamma aminobutyric acid, can be added to or substituted for CBZ when this Na+ channel blocker fails to control partial seizures. This lends credence to the hypothesis in support of a mechanistic approach to the management of epilepsy.

A Double-Blind Evaluation of Gabapentin on Alcohol Effects and Drinking in a Clinical Laboratory Paradigm

INTRODUCTION

There has been increasing interest in the use of anticonvulsant agents in the treatment of alcoholism. Anticonvulsant agents have mostly been evaluated as an alternative to benzodiazepines in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal. Among the advantages of using anticonvulsant agents in this capacity is their purported lack of interaction with alcohol (i.e., interactions that could increase psychomotor deficits, cognitive impairment, and increase intoxication). This is particularly important in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal and relapse prevention in outpatients. Unfortunately, these untoward clinical interactions between anticonvulsants and alcohol in alcoholic patients have not been thoroughly assessed. The current clinical laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the anticonvulsant gabapentin in alcoholic subjects. In addition, the ability of gabapentin to reduce alcohol craving and consumption was evaluated.

METHODS

Thirty-five non-treatment-seeking alcoholic subjects were enrolled in a subacute human laboratory study and received double-blind treatment with up to 1,200 mg of gabapentin (n=18) or placebo (n=17) for 8 days. The safety and tolerability of gabapentin were monitored in the natural environment during the first 5 days of medication treatment and during a free-choice limited access consumption paradigm following an initial drink of alcohol in a bar-lab setting on Day 7.

RESULTS

There was no overall effect of gabapentin on drinking or craving; however, it was tolerated (e.g., mood and sedation) as well as placebo over 5 days of natural drinking. During the bar-lab drinking session, there were no differences in subjective high or intoxication between subjects treated with gabapentin or placebo.

DISCUSSION

This study provides initial evidence that the anticonvulsant gabapentin is safe if used in conjunction with alcohol consumption in alcoholic individuals. Further study is needed with this and other lab models to determine the utility and safety of gabapentin in the treatment of alcoholism.

Effect of preemptive gabapentin on postoperative pain relief and morphine consumption following lumbar laminectomy and discectomy: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study

Synergism between gabapentin and morphine in treating incisional pain has been demonstrated in animal experiments and clinical studies. The efficacy of gabapentin for treatment of perioperative pain remains controversial. This study was designed to detect the influence of gabapentin premedication on morphine consumption in the immediate postoperative period in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy and discectomy. Either gabapentin 800 mg (in two equally divided doses) or placebo was given preoperatively to 60 adult patients undergoing elective lumbar laminectomy or discectomy in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Standard general anesthesia was given to all the patients. Morphine was administered via patient-controlled analgesia pump in the immediate postoperative period for first 8 hours. Pain at rest and on movement was assessed using a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) every 2 hours for the first 8 postoperative hours. There were no differences in demographics or surgical duration between the two groups. The amount of fentanyl administered in the intraoperative period was similar between the two groups. In the postoperative period, the VRS score for pain at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours was not significantly different between the two groups. Highest median VRS score was recorded at 0 hours postoperatively in both groups (VRS: rest = 6, movement = 8 in placebo group; rest = 6, movement = 8 in gabapentin group). Total morphine consumption and side effects were similar in the two groups. Gabapentin does not decrease the morphine requirement or morphine side effects in the immediate postoperative period following lumbar laminectomy and discectomy.

Pregabalin versus pramipexole: effects on sleep disturbance in restless legs syndrome

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare pregabalin versus placebo and pramipexole for reducing restless legs syndrome (RLS)-related sleep disturbance.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial.

SETTING

Twenty-three US sleep centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-five individuals with moderate to severe idiopathic RLS and associated sleep disturbance.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized across 6 treatment sequences comprising three 4-week periods on pregabalin 300 mg/day (n = 75), pramipexole 0.5 mg/day (n = 76), or placebo (n = 73).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Polysomnography was conducted over 2 nights at the end of each period. Primary (wake after sleep onset [WASO], pregabalin vs placebo) and key secondary endpoints were analyzed for statistical significance, with descriptive statistics for other endpoints. Pregabalin improved sleep maintenance, demonstrated by reductions in WASO (-27.1 min vs placebo [P < 0.0001]; -26.9 vs pramipexole) and number of awakenings after sleep onset (-2.7 vs placebo; -7.9 vs pramipexole [P < 0.0001]) by polysomnography, and an increase in subjective total sleep time (30.8 min vs placebo [P < 0.0001]; 26.8 vs pramipexole). Pregabalin also increased slow wave sleep duration (20.9 min vs placebo; 32.1 vs pramipexole [P < 0.0001]). Reduction in periodic limb movement arousal index (PLMAI) with pregabalin was similar to pramipexole and greater than placebo (-3.7 PLMA/h [P < 0.0001]), although reduction in total PLM in sleep was less than for pramipexole.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated improvements in objective and subjective measures of sleep maintenance and sleep architecture with pregabalin compared with placebo and pramipexole. Effects of pregabalin on periodic limb movement arousal index were comparable to pramipexole.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00991276; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00991276.

Vigabatrin

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) was first proposed as a putative inhibitory neurotransmitter by Elliot and van Gelder in 1958. Since then, numerous efforts have been made to find ways to increase GABA at its receptor sites, based on the findings that decreased GABA results in convulsions in animals and that agents enhancing GABA-mediated functions can have antiepileptic effects. However, the relationship between GABA levels and seizures is not simple. Seizures can occur even in the presence of elevated GABA levels. Indeed, it is possible that regional biochemical differences in the brain can be important. The antiepileptic effects of GABA depend on the mechanism whereby GABA-mediated inhibition is enhanced. Since the 1970s, several compounds have been developed that are designed to act in some manner on the GABA system. These compounds affect GABA-mediated inhibition at different levels and appear to have varied effects, depending on their mechanism of action. To date, specific antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with potential GABA-inhibitory effects have been designed either to have GABA agonist properties, to inhibit GABA catabolism, to inhibit GABA uptake, or to facilitate GABA release or facilitate GABAA receptor activity. Vigabatrin (VGB) was designed specifically to inhibit GABA transaminase and thereby increase the availability of GABA in the brain. Study data and clinical experience over the past 14 years have demonstrated VGB to be an effective AED.

Pregabalin reduces post-operative pain after mastectomy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Pregabalin is used for the treatment of neuropathic pain and has shown analgesic efficacy in post-operative pain. The aim of this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (Clinical Trials.gov ID NCT00938548) was to investigate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin for reducing post-operative pain in patients after mastectomy.

METHODS

Eighty-four women scheduled for elective mastectomy were randomly assigned to groups that received either pregabalin (75 mg) or placebo, 1 h before surgery and 12 h after the initial dose. Assessments of pain [verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS), at rest and with arm abduction] and side effects were performed at 1, 6, 24 and 48 h post-operatively. After discharge from the hospital, pain was assessed by telephone interview at post-operative 1 week and 1 month.

RESULTS

VNRS scores for pain at rest were lower in the pregabalin group (n=42) than the placebo group (n=42) at 1, 24 and 48 h post-operatively (P<0.05). VNRS scores for pain with arm abduction were lower in the pregabalin group (n=42) than the placebo group (n=42) at 1 and 24 h, and 1 week post-operatively (P<0.05). Incidences of side effects such as nausea and vomiting, headache, dizziness and blurred vision were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative administration of pregabalin for a single day (75 mg twice daily) was easy, safe and effective in reducing post-operative pain in patients undergoing mastectomy.

The effects of clonazepam and vigabatrin in hyperekplexia

Hyperekplexia is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by a point mutation in the alpha1 subunit of the glycine receptor, characterized by excessive startle responses followed by temporary generalized stiffness. Clonazepam, effective in open case studies, potentiates, through unknown mechanisms, the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Vigabatrin increases GABA by inhibition of the GABA catabolic enzyme GABA-transaminase. Effects of clonazepam (1 mg for 1 day) and vigabatrin (1000 mg per day for 5 days) were investigated in a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study in 4 patients with hyperekplexia. The pharmacodynamic parameters were startle reflexes, studied 3 times during the day. At each time, 2 trains of 10 auditive stimuli (113 dB) were given at intervals of 10 and 60 s. Startle movements were quantified with summed areas of EMG-bursts of the orbicularis oculi, sternocleidomastoid, biceps and thenar muscles. The degrees of stiffness and drowsiness were quantified with visual analogue scores (VAS) 10 times during the day, by both the patient and the observer. Clonazepam, but not vigabatrin, reduced startle activity significantly in both paradigms. The degree of stiffness and drowsiness was not significantly influenced by either drug.

Antiepileptic medications in multiple sclerosis: adverse effects in a three-year follow-up study

Neuropathic pain and paroxysmal symptoms are common in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, although no double-blind clinical trial has been conducted to support antiepileptic medications (AED) use in MS. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of AED utilisation and reported adverse events, in a cohort of MS patients. For a period of 3 years the rationale for prescribing AED, adverse effects, treatment duration and reasons for discontinuation were recorded in a database. Carbamazepine (CBZ) was prescribed in 36 patients, with adverse effects reported in 20 cases, of which 12 mimicked a relapse. Gabapentin (GBP) was prescribed in 94 patients, with adverse effects reported in 16 cases and in one case mimicked a relapse. Lamotrigine (LMT) was prescribed in 22 patients, with adverse effects reported in 4 cases, none mimicking a relapse. The present study found a significantly higher incidence of adverse effects in patients treated with CBZ, with a high rate of discontinuation at low dosages and episodes of evident worsening of neurological functioning compared to GBP or LMT.

Pregabalin: a new antiepileptic drug for refractory epilepsy

Pregabalin is a recently licensed and marketed antiepileptic drug for use as adjunctive treatment of partial epilepsy. It acts at presynaptic calcium channels, modulating neurotransmitter release in the CNS, properties it shares with gabapentin. Its clinical development over the past decade has included its use in the treatment of neuropathic pain, and generalized anxiety disorder, in addition to epilepsy. Three multi-centre randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials enrolling patients with refractory partial epilepsy have demonstrated an antiepileptic effect of pregabalin against placebo, as adjunctive therapy, with 31-51% of patients showing a 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Adverse effects were dose related, the commonest being somnolence, dizziness, and ataxia. Weight gain was seen in 14% of patients on the highest dose of 600 mg/day. Around 9000 people have been exposed to pregabalin in its development for all indications. No idiosyncratic reactions have been described to date. Pregabalin may be a useful addition in the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy. As with all new AEDs long-term follow up and post marketing surveillance is required.

Reversibility of vigabratin-induced visual-field defect

We report a girl with epilepsy aged 10 years receiving vigabatrin and complaining of bumping into objects and presenting visual-field constriction, which disappeared after vigabatrin withdrawal.

Gabapentin for the treatment of itching produced by burns and wound healing in children: a pilot study

We describe the use of gabapentin for the treatment of itching in wound healing in 35 children. All children were already treated with chlorpheniramine and trimeprazine but they remained irritable and were constantly rubbing their wounds. Within 24h of commencing treatment itching had improved significantly in all of the children.

Post-herpetic neuralgia: 5% lidocaine medicated plaster, pregabalin, or a combination of both? A randomized, open, clinical effectiveness study

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine medicated plaster with pregabalin in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), and to assess the benefits of combining both drugs in patients not responding to either single agent.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a two-stage adaptive, randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority study (NCT 00414349). The subset of patients with PHN is reported here. Patients with an absolute value of >4 on the NRS-3 were randomly assigned to 4-week treatment with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster or twice-daily pregabalin capsules titrated to effect. Subsequently, patients sufficiently treated with monotherapy (patients with NRS-3 <or=4 at 4 weeks or a reduction on the NRS-3 from baseline of >or=2 points) continued with monotherapy; patients insufficiently treated with monotherapy received both drugs in combination for 8 weeks.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain according to SF-MPQ and NPSI, onset of effect, reduction in worst pain on the NRS; allodynia severity; quality of life (QoL) based on EQ-5D, SF-36; PGIC; rescue medication intake; adverse events (AEs) monitoring.

RESULTS

At 4 weeks, SF-MPQ total scores improved by -7.6 +/- 6.66 (mean +/- SD) under 5% lidocaine medicated plaster and by -5.3 +/- 7.93 under pregabalin. NPSI total scores declined by -1.6 +/- 1.73 under 5% lidocaine medicated plaster and -1.4 +/- 1.87 under pregabalin. Lidocaine plaster was also effective in reducing worst pain and showed a fast onset of effect. During combination treatment, SF-MPQ and NPSI scores, allodynia, EQ-5D and PGIC improved. Incidences of AEs were in line with previous reports for the two treatments and combination therapy was generally well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this open-label study is lacking a placebo control group, the results suggest that 5% lidocaine medicated plaster is at least as effective as pregabalin for pain relief in PHN, with a favourable safety profile and a resulting positive benefit-risk ratio. In patients unresponsive to either monotherapy, combination therapy provides additional efficacy and is well-tolerated.

Pregabalin for the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder

Pregabalin is a new anxiolytic that has been recently licensed for the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) in Europe. Short-term efficacy is based on six positive placebo-controlled studies, all of which showed a significant early separation from placebo in all of the doses used (150-600 mg) at the first week, and the efficacy at the end of the treatment was comparable with the comparators used in four of these studies. Pregabalin was effective in more or less severe GAD, on psychic and somatic symptoms of GAD, and in treating the subsyndromal depressive symptoms of GAD. Efficacy in the elderly was shown in a separate placebo-controlled study. The effect on cognitive function was minimal and notably less than that observed with benzodiazepines. The discontinuation symptoms following abrupt treatment cessation were similar to the rates with serotonin-noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitors and lower than with benzodiazepines with no signals of tolerance or dependence.

Pregabalin in restless legs syndrome with and without neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurological disorder complicated in many patients by augmentation to dopaminergic therapy or comorbidities such as neuropathic pain.

AIMS

To explore the effectiveness of pregabalin in RLS in a pragmatic clinical setting.

METHODS

After observing improvement of restless legs symptoms in seven patients treated with pregabalin for neuropathic pain, we extended the clinical observation to a total of 16 patients with secondary RLS, in most of them due to neuropathy, and to three patients with idiopathic RLS.

RESULTS

Three patients discontinued pregabalin because of side effects (rash, fatigue, loss of efficacy). The other 16 patients self-rated a satisfactory or good alleviation of RLS symptoms and maintained pregabalin, five with add-on medication, on a mean daily dose of 305 mg (standard deviation, 185 mg), and with a mean duration of 217 (standard deviation, 183) days.

CONCLUSION

These data propose pregabalin as a new option in the treatment of secondary RLS for patients with neuropathic pain, which should be further investigated with randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

Newer antiepileptic drugs. Towards an improved risk-benefit ratio

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. Even though existing antiepileptic drugs can render 80% of newly diagnosed patients seizure free, a significant number of patients have chronic intractable epilepsy causing disability with considerable socioeconomic implications. There is, therefore, a need for more potent and effective antiepileptic drugs and drugs with fewer adverse effects, particularly CNS effects. Drugs for the treatment of partial seizures are particularly needed. With major advances in our understanding of the basic neuropathology, neuropharmacology and neurophysiology of epilepsy, numerous candidate novel antiepileptic drugs have been developed in recent years. This review comparatively evaluates the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and adverse effects of 12 new antiepileptic drugs namely vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, felbamate, tiagabine, eterobarb, zonisamide, remacemide, stiripentol, topiramate and levetiracetam (ucb-L059). Of the 12 drugs, vigabatrin, lamotrigine and gabapentin have recently been marketed in the UK. Five of these new drugs have known mechanisms of action (vigabatrin, lamotrigine, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine and eterobarb), which may provide for a more rational approach to the treatment of epilepsy. Oxcarbazepine, remacemide and eterobarb are prodrugs. Vigabatrin, gabapentin and topiramate are more promising on the basis of their pharmacokinetic characteristics in that they are excreted mainly unchanged in urine and not susceptible to significant pharmacokinetic interactions. In contrast, lamotrigine, felbamate and stiripentol exhibit significant drug interactions. Essentially, all the drugs are effective in partial or secondarily generalised seizures and are effective to varying degrees in other seizure types. Particularly welcome is the possible effectiveness of zonisamide in myoclonus and felbamate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. In relation to adverse effects, CNS effects are observed with all drugs, however, gabapentin, remacemide and levetiracetam appear to exhibit least. There is also the possibility of rational duotherapy, using drugs with known mechanisms of action, as an additional therapeutic approach. The efficacy of these 12 antiepileptic drug occurs despite the fact that candidate antiepileptic drugs are evaluated under highly unfavourable conditions, namely as add-on therapy in patients refractory to drug management and with high seizure frequency. Thus, whilst candidate drugs which do become licensed are an advance in that they are effective and/or are associated with less adverse effects than currently available antiepileptic drugs in these patients, it is possible that these drugs may exhibit even more improved risk-benefit ratios when used in normal clinical practice.

Gabapentin treatment of neurogenic overactive bladder

OBJECTIVE

Detrusor overactivity is a well-recognized and distressing medical condition affecting both men and women, with a significant prevalence in the population and with a higher incidence rate in people older than 70 years. This pathological condition is characterized by irritative symptoms: urinary urgency, with or without incontinence, and urinary frequency, often seriously compromising the quality of life of the people who have it. The complaint of these symptoms is defined by the International Continence Society (www.continet.org) as "overactive bladder." Many neurological patients experience irritative symptoms of the lower urinary tract related to their disease, and this condition drastically limits their social life. Various drugs have been introduced in therapy protocols to treat neurogenic detrusor overactivity; however, in many cases, the outcomes of these treatments have proven to be unsatisfactory. This fact is probably related to the incomplete understanding of the pathophysiological aspects of detrusor overactivity. Recent studies suggest the possible role in the detrusor overactivity pathogenesis of bladder receptors, afferent pathways, and spinal cord interneurons; consequently, the modulation of bladder receptor and/or spinal cord centers activity has been proposed as a possible approach to control involuntary detrusor contractions, using drugs capable of acting on bladder afferent pathways. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of gabapentin, an anticonvulsive agent used by neurologists in the treatment of epilepsy and neurogenic pain, in the treatment of detrusor overactivity of neurogenic origin.

METHODS

Sixteen patients affected by neurogenic overactive bladder were enrolled in the study. The clinical outcomes were assessed by symptomatic score evaluations, voiding diary, and urodynamic test before and after 31 days of gabapentin treatment.

RESULTS

The preliminary results showed significant modifications of urodynamic indexes, particularly of the detrusor overactivity, whereas the symptomatic score evaluation and the voiding diary data demonstrated a significant lowering of the irritative symptoms. Furthermore, we did not record significant adverse effects and no patient interrupted the drug treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the rationale that detrusor overactivity may be controlled by modulating the afferent input from the bladder and the excitability of the sacral reflex center and suggest a novel method to treat overactive bladder patients.

Gabapentin for the treatment of neuropathic pain in a pregnant horse

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 24-year-old 732-kg (1,610-lb) pregnant Belgian draft horse mare developed neuropathy and signs of intractable pain following colic surgery.

CLINICAL FINDINGS

Following recovery from colic surgery to treat compression of the small and large intestines because of a large fetus, the mare was noticed to have signs of femoral neuropathy involving the left hind limb. Within 36 hours after recovery, the mare developed signs of severe pain that were unresponsive to conventional treatment. No gastrointestinal tract or muscular abnormalities were found, and the discomfort was attributed to neuropathic pain.

TREATMENT AND OUTCOME

The mare was treated with gabapentin (2.5 mg/kg [1.1 mg/lb], PO, q 12 h). Shortly after this treatment was initiated, the mare appeared comfortable and no longer had signs of pain. Treatment was continued for 6 days, during which the dosage was progressively decreased, and the mare was discharged. The mare subsequently delivered a healthy foal.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Gabapentin appeared to be a safe, effective, and economical treatment for neuropathic pain in this horse.

Inappropriate use of carbamazepine and vigabatrin in typical absence seizures

Carbamazepine and vigabatrin are contraindicated in typical absence seizures. Of 18 consecutive referrals of children with resistant typical absences only, eight were erroneously treated with carbamazepine either as monotherapy or as an add-on. Vigabatrin was also used in the treatment of two children. Frequency of absences increased in four children treated with carbamazepine and two of these developed myoclonic jerks, which resolved on withdrawal of carbamazepine. Absences were aggravated in both cases where vigabatrin was added on to concurrent treatment. Optimal control of the absences was achieved with sodium valproate, lamotrigine, or ethosuximide alone or in combination.