Comparison of trimetazidine plus sildenafil to chronic nitrates in the control of myocardial ischemia during sexual activity in patients with coronary artery disease

A large proportion of patients who have erectile dysfunction also have coronary artery disease (CAD). In these patients, nitrate therapy is a contraindication to the use of sildenafil. To assess whether the metabolic anti-ischemic agent, trimetazidine, is effective in controlling episodes of myocardial ischemia during sexual activity in patients who have CAD and use long-term nitrate therapy, we studied 38 men (57 +/- 6 years of age) who had proved CAD. Patients underwent 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring at baseline, after 1 week of oral nitrate therapy (20 mg 3 times a day), and after 1 week of trimetazidine (20 mg 3 times a day). Patients were asked to engage in >/=1 session of sexual intercourse during each session of ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. They were instructed to take sildenafil (100 mg) 1 hour before sexual intercourse performed at baseline and during therapy with trimetazidine and sildenafil or placebo (blinded) during therapy with nitrates. A decrease in total ischemic burden was observed with nitrates and trimetazidine compared with baseline (-3 +/- 1.2 episodes/patient/24 hours vs -5 +/- 1.3 episodes/patient/24 hours and -6 +/- 5 min/patient/24 hours vs -8 +/- 3 min/patient/24 hours, p <0.01 for nitrates and trimetazidine vs baseline). Trimetazidine plus sildenafil was more effective in controlling episodes of myocardial ischemia during sexual activity than nitrates alone (-45 +/- 11% vs -18 +/- 7%, p <0.04). In conclusion, in patients who have CAD, combination therapy with sildenafil and trimetazidine is more effective than nitrate therapy in the control of ischemic episodes during sexual activity, suggesting that long-term nitrate therapy may be safely switched to trimetazidine therapy when therapy for erectile dysfunction is required.

Chronic Treatment with Tadalafil Improves Endothelial Function in Men with Increased Cardiovascular Risk

OBJECTIVE

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is often associated with a cluster of risk factors for coronary artery disease and reduced endothelial function. Acute and chronic administration of oral sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, improves endothelial function in patients with ED. Tadalafil (TAD) is a new PDE5 inhibitor with a long half life that allows alternate day administration. Aim of the study was to evaluate whether chronic therapy (4 weeks) with TAD improves endothelial function in patients with increased cardiovascular risk and whether this effect is sustained after discontinuation of therapy.

METHODS

We randomized 32 patients with increased cardiovascular risk to receive either TAD 20 mg on alternate days or matching placebo (PLB) for 4 weeks. Patients underwent evaluation of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), nitrite/nitrate and endothelin-1 plasma levels at baseline, at the end of treatment period and after two-weeks follow-up.

RESULTS

At 4 weeks, FMD was significantly improved by TAD (from 4.2+/-3.2 to 9.3+/-3.7%, p<0.01 vs. baseline), but was not modified by PLB (from 4.1+/-2.8 to 4.0+/-3.4%, p=NS). At 6 weeks the benefit in FMD was sustained in patients that received TAD (9.1+/-3.9% vs. 4.2+/-3.2%, p=0.01 vs. baseline; 9.1+/-3.9% vs. 9.3+/-3.7%, vs. 4 weeks, p=NS) while no changes in FMD were observed in patients randomized to PLB. Also, compared to baseline, a net increase in nitrite/nitrate levels (38.2+/-12.3 vs. 52.6+/-11.7 and 51.1+/-3.1, p<0.05) and a decrease in endothelin-1 levels (3.3+/-0.9 vs. 2.9.+/-0.7 and 2.9+/-0.9, p<0.05) was found both at four and six-weeks after TAD; these changes were inversely correlated as shown by regression analysis (adjusted R2=0.81, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic therapy with TAD improves endothelial function in patients with increased cardiovascular risk regardless their degree of ED. The benefit of this therapy is sustained for at least two weeks after the discontinuation of therapy. Larger studies are needed in order to assess the possible clinical implications of chronic therapy with TAD.

Effects of androgens on the cardiovascular system

The evidence that men have a greater incidence of coronary artery disease than women of similar age, together with the fact that android fat distribution is associated with a greater incidence of coronary heart disease, have suggested that high testosterone levels are associated with an increased risk for coronary artery disease. The possible causal role of androgens in the development of cardiovascular disease has not been proven and, to date, there are no epidemiological and pathophysiological evidences to support that an hyper-androgenic state or androgen replacement is associated with cardiovascular disease in both sexes. Clinical studies have suggested that physiological testosterone supplementation in ageing males has a positive effect upon lipid profile. Additional potential protective cardiovascular effects of androgens may be related to their effect upon endothelial function and vasomotor tone. Few data are currently available on the correlation between plasma testosterone levels and coronary artery disease in men. Cross-sectional studies reported either reduced or similar plasma testosterone levels and/or androgens in patients with coronary artery disease as compared to controls without cardiovascular symptoms. Epidemiological studies addressing the importance of androgen levels upon cardiovascular mortality and morbidity have gathered inconclusive results. Prospective studies found no significant association between plasma testosterone and cardiac events in both sexes, while most cross-sectional studies have repetitively found an association between hypotestosteronemia and cardiovascular morbidity. In conclusion, androgens in general and testosterone in particular may have some protective effects on the cardiovascular system through their metabolic and direct effects upon human vasculature.

Effects of estradiol on myocardial global performance index in hypertensive postmenopausal women

The objective of this study was to assess the acute and chronic effects of estradiol on the myocardial performance index (MPI) in hypertensive postmenopausal women. There are conflicting reports on the effects of estrogen on left ventricular function in postmenopausal women, and we are unaware of any study on the myocardial performance index in the postmenopausal state. We undertook a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 34 women, distributed into an estradiol group or a placebo group. After 90 min and at 12 weeks of administration of 1 mg of oral estradiol we evaluated, by Doppler echocardiography, its effects on the MPI. The estradiol group showed no alteration in the MPI after 90 min of the administration of estradiol. On the other hand, after 12 weeks of treatment we observed a statistically significant decrease of isovolumic relaxation time, from 127+/-23 ms to 106+/-16 ms (p < 0.001 and of the MPI from 0.63+/-0.13 to 0.48+/-0.09 (p < 0.01) and an increase in ejection time, from 297+/-32 ms to 330+/-31 ms (p < 0.01). In conclusion, estrogen replacement therapy over a period of 12 weeks showed a significant improvement in the MPI in hypertensive postmenopausal women, whereas the acute administration did not have any effect.

Trimetazidine improves left ventricular function and quality of life in elderly patients with coronary artery disease

AIM

Elderly patients have an increased incidence of ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy often related to diffuse coronary artery disease. Trimetazidine protects ischaemic myocardium by improving the myocardial energy utilisation during myocardial ischaemia. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of trimetazidine on left ventricular (LV) function in elderly patients with ischaemic heart disease and reduced LV function.

METHODS

Forty seven elderly patients (40 males and 7 females, mean age 78+/-3 years) were randomised to receive, in addition to standard therapy, either trimetazidine or placebo and were evaluated by echocardiography at baseline and after 6 months.

RESULTS

Trimetazidine and placebo had no effect on either blood pressure or heart rate (SBP 2+/-5 vs 4+/-6 mmHg, DBP -1+/-6 vs 3+/-4 mmHg, HR -3+/-7 vs 5+/-9 bpm, trimetazidine and placebo compared to baseline, respectively). At the end of the study patients randomised to trimetazidine showed a significant greater left ventricular function and smaller left ventricular diastolic and systolic diameters and volume indices compared to patients receiving placebo (LVEF: 34.4+/-2.3% vs 27+/-2.8%, p<0.0001; LVEDD: 58.6+/-1.9 mm vs 64+/-1.7 mm, p<0.0001; LVESD: 44.5+/-1.1 vs 50+/-0.8 mm, p<0.0001). A significant smaller wall motion score index was detected in trimetazidine-treated patients compared to those allocated to placebo (1.24+/-0.12 vs 1.45+/-0.19, p<0.01), the percentage change in LVEF compared to baseline was also significantly greater in trimetazidine-treated patients. Diastolic function significantly improved in the trimetazidine group while it remained unchanged in the placebo group. At follow-up evaluation, patients receiving trimetazidine showed a greater improvement in angina and NYHA class than patients allocated to placebo. Quality of life significantly improved in all patients treated with trimetazidine while remained unchanged in those allocated to placebo.

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy trimetazidine in addition to standard medical therapy has a beneficial effect on LV systolic and diastolic function, and improves quality of life.

Postmenopausal hormone therapy: lessons from observational and randomized studies

The effect of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for cardioprotection in postmenopausal women remains controversial. Observational studies conducted in the past two decades have suggested an average risk reduction of 50% for the primary prevention of CAD, these findings, however, have not been confirmed by recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The discrepancies in results between observational and randomized studies are related to several differences in patient selection, hormone regimen, and biological effect of hormones in different periods of women's life. In an attempt to justify the use of hormone replacement therapy against the mounting contraindications for any use by several opinion leaders and scientific societies, several authors have criticized the design and the results of the randomized clinical trials as the cause of the unexpected results. The randomized clinical studies were conducted exceptionally well; therefore, methodologic issues are not the problem. The main difference between the observational and randomized studies, which may fully explain the discrepancies between these studies, are the women under study and their reasons for taking hormone therapy. In the observational studies women choose to take ovarian hormones initially for menopausal symptoms and then may have decided to continue for other reasons, while in the randomized studies the absence of menopausal symptoms was a pre-requisite for inclusion in the study. This apparently small difference has important implications because symptomatic women are younger and have clinical symptoms that suggest the lack of estrogen effect on several organs or systems. In conclusion, several biological reasons may have contributed to the divergent findings from observational studies and RCTs. Clearly time elapsed since menopause seems to be an important one for its effect on vascular responsiveness to ovarian hormones and to prothrombotic effects. In the meantime, a role remains for combined estrogen and progestin supplementation in the treatment of menopausal symptoms.

Menopause induced by oophorectomy reveals a role of ovarian estrogen on the maintenance of pressure homeostasis

OBJECTIVES

Following spontaneous menopause women show a greater increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure than men of the same age. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of acute ovarian hormone withdrawal and replacement on blood pressure and forearm blood flow.

METHODS

We studied 18 fertile middle-aged normotensive women (48 +/- 1.5 years, range 46-51 years) 1 week prior and 1 month subsequent to bilateral oophorectomy by means of 24-h blood pressure monitoring and strain-gauge venous occlusion plethysmography. Eighteen subjects who had undergone hysterectomy with ovarian sparing, matched for age and biophysical characteristics, were used as a control group. All women were free from cardiovascular risk factors or disease.

RESULTS

Oophorectomy increased the mean values of 24 h (P < 0.001), daytime (P < 0.05), and nighttime (P < 0.01) diastolic blood pressure and nighttime systolic blood pressure (P < 0.01). Blood pressure increase was associated with a rise in forearm vascular resistance (P < 0.01). No significant changes in either blood pressure or forearm vascular resistance values were observed in hysterectomized women. In 16 oophorectomized women a 3-month estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) (17beta-estradiol, 100 mcg/day by transdermal patches) brought blood pressure and forearm vascular resistance values to a level comparable to that recorded before intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgically-induced menopause causes an increase in peripheral vascular resistance and blood pressure suggesting a role of ovarian hormones in the homeostatic pressure modulation. Recovery of the baseline condition after ERT suggests that the accelerated increase in blood pressure after menopause is due to ovarian and above all estrogen insufficiency.

Metabolic and vascular effect of progestins in post-menopausal women. Implications for cardioprotection

Estrogen therapy causes changes in a variety of cardiovascular risk factors, including insulin resistance, lipoprotein profile, haemostasis, coronary atherosclerosis and vascular reactive, that suggest a potential cardioprotective effect in postmenopausal women. With respect to the role of adjunctive progestins, currently available data suggest that the cardiovascular effects may differ depending on the type, dosage and route of administration of the progestin. Androgenic progestins antagonise the favourable cardiovascular effect of estrogens, whilst non-androgenic progestins do not impair, or may even enhance, the beneficial effect of estrogens. Therefore, less androgenic progestins would appear to be the agent of choice for combined hormone therapy in postmenopausal women with cardiovascular risk factors.

Comparative vascular effects of hormone replacement therapy and raloxifene in women at increased cardiovascular risk

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) improves endothelial function in postmenopausal women while the effects of raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, are still under debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilatation in the brachial artery and plasma levels of nitrite, nitrate and endothelin-1 in 20 postmenopausal women with increased cardiovascular risk treated with either HRT or raloxifene for 4 weeks in a randomized double-blind single cross-over study. Patients had an endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilatation of 4% prior to initiation of the study. Treatment with HRT resulted in a 67% increase in dilatation compared with baseline (from a 7.4% increase to a 12.4% increase, p < 0.01). Raloxifene treatment resulted in no change in vasodilatation from baseline. Endothelium-dependent dilatation was significantly improved by HRT compared with raloxifene treatment (12.4+/-0.6% vs. 6.1+/-2.0%; p < 0.01). Compared with baseline values, nitrate plus nitrite levels increased significantly (p < 0.05) with HRT but not with raloxifene. Similarly, endothelin-1 decreased from baseline with both treatments, but only the HRT-induced decrease was statistically significant (p < 0.05). In conclusion, HRT improved endothelial function and reduced plasma levels of endothelin-1 in postmenopausal women at risk of coronary artery disease. These beneficial effects were not shared by raloxifene.

[Quality of life in elderly patients with ischemic cardiopathy]

The progressive aging of the general population is associated with a parallel increment of cardiovascular diseases which are the main cause of death and morbidity in the elderly. Quality of life in elderly patients with ischemic heart disease is one of the most important objectives of medical practice. In the clinical management of elderly coronary patients it must be taken into account not just the general clinical conditions and the presence of comorbidities, but also the impact of therapy on life expectancy and quality of life. Revascularization should be reserved to those patients with refractory angina despite maximal medical therapy and to those in whom angina compromises the quality of life. Conventional antianginal therapy consists mainly in the administration of drugs with hemodynamic mechanisms that in elderly patients may be associated with a higher incidence of significant adverse effects that are dependent not only upon their hemodynamic action but also on altered pharmacokinetics. Adjunctive therapy with metabolic agents, such as trimetazidine, to standard care of elderly patients with ischemic heart disease may be particularly useful in the treatment of angina. The improvement in cardiac global performance, seen with adjunctive trimetazidine, is associated with a reduction in symptoms and with an improvement in functional capacity and quality of life.

The metabolic syndrome in women: implications for therapy

It is becoming increasingly clear that hypertension and metabolic risk factors in women are inter-related and often share underlying causes. Menopause acts explicitly as a risk factor by reducing the direct beneficial effect of ovarian hormones upon cardiovascular functions and indirectly by negatively influencing other risk factors for coronary artery disease--i.e. hyperinsulinaemia, blood cholesterol, blood pressure, coagulation etc. Adverse changes in one factor may induce adverse changes in a variety of other risk factors and it is important to consider co-ordinated changes when evaluating these patients rather than attempt to isolate independent factors. Similarly with treatment, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal hypertensive women has important implications and some antihypertensive drugs may worsen the already altered metabolic profile of these patients while others may be beneficial. Centrally-acting sympatholytic agents, e.g. moxonidine, are therefore important to consider in hypertensive postmenopausal women who experience other symptoms of metabolic syndrome.

Hormone replacement therapy and cardioprotection: the end of the tale?

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in women after the age of 50 years in most developed countries. Estrogen deficiency plays a key role in causing CVD in women. Apart from the direct effect of ovarian hormones on the vessel wall, cessation of ovarian function and the consequent reduction of sex steroid hormone levels have important metabolic and pathological implications that negatively influence the cardiovascular system. Therefore, the increased incidence of CVD observed in women after menopause should be considered on a multifactorial basis. Data available for the effects of ERT and HRT in the primary prevention of CVD are mainly observational. However, despite limitations related to this kind of study, it must be noted that their results consistently show a reduction in cardiovascular events in hormone users. Meta-analysis of epidemiological studies found that women who had ever used estrogens had a 34% overall reduction in the relative risk of cardiovascular events compared to those who had never used hormones. Most of the early epidemiological studies were conducted using unopposed estrogen replacement therapy. The number of studies evaluating the effects of estrogen-progestin replacement therapy is limited. Recently, the estrogen-progestin arm of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study has been stopped because of an increased incidence of breast cancer, and too early on to give any insight into possible cardiovascular effects. Comments on the cardiovascular effects of HRT from the results of the WHI study are therefore not warranted, as the study did not continue for a duration long enough to enable a calculation of cardiovascular end points. The WHI study included only one single type of estrogen-progestin association; whether different estrogen-progestin combinations, more commonly used outside the United States, may have a different effect is still a matter of speculation. A major difference between observational and randomized studies on the effect of ovarian hormones on cardiovascular function is the time of HRT initiation since menopause, which is significantly shorter in observational studies. In conclusion, the average 35-50% risk reduction in CVD with HRT in primary prevention in postmenopausal women is based on nonrandomized observational data.

Report of erectile dysfunction after therapy with beta-blockers is related to patient knowledge of side effects and is reversed by placebo

AIMS

Patients with cardiovascular diseases frequently complain of erectile dysfunction especially when treated with beta-blockers. In order to assess whether the effect of beta-blockers on erectile dysfunction is in part related to patient knowledge of the drug side effects, 96 patients (all males, age 52+/-7 years) with newly diagnosed cardiovascular disease and not suffering from erectile dysfunction entered a two phase, single cross over study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

During the first phase of the study patients received atenolol 50mg o.d. (A), 32 patients were blinded on the drug given (group A), 32 were informed on the drug given but not on its side effects (group B) and 32 took A after being informed on its side effects on erectile function (group C). After 3 months the incidence of erectile dysfunction was 3.1% in the group A, 15.6% in group B and 31.2% in group C (P<0.01). All patients reporting ED entered the second phase of the study and were randomised to receive Sildenafil 50mg and placebo in a cross over study. Sildenafil citrate and placebo were equally effective in reversing erectile dysfunction in all but one patient reporting ED with Atenolol.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that the knowledge and prejudice about side effects of beta-blockers can produce anxiety, that may cause erectile function.

[Clinical and diagnostic approach to erectile dysfunction]

Erectile dysfunction (ED), defined as the inability to achieve and/or maintain an erection sufficiently long for a satisfactory sexual performance or intercourse, is an important and common medical problem. ED is not a life-threatening disorder, but it influences the daily routine, social interactions, well-being and quality of life of the patient. Recent epidemiological data have shown a high prevalence and incidence of ED. The Massachusetts Male Aging Study found that 52% of men between the ages of 40 and 70 years reported ED with 9.6% having mild, 22.2% moderate and 17.2% complete or severe ED. In a large Italian cross-sectional study the overall prevalence of self-reported ED was 12.8% and the frequency of ED increases with age. ED may signal serious underlying and potentially life-threatening diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease and other neurological and endocrine disorders. Also well documented is the role of some drug groups, certain types of surgery, injuries and the role of risk factors related to lifestyle such as smoking, alcohol consumption and inappropriate dietary habits accompanied by an abnormal serum level of cholesterol. The current availability of effective and safe oral drugs for ED in conjunction with the tremendous media interest in the condition, have resulted in an increasing number of men seeking help for ED. As a consequence, many physicians without background knowledge and clinical experience in the diagnosis of ED are involved in making decisions concerning the evaluation of such patients. The result of this is that some males with ED may undergo little or no evaluation before treatment is initiated and, in such circumstances, the disease causing the symptom (ED) may remain untreated. Baseline diagnostic evaluation for ED can identify the underlying pathological condition or the risk factors associated with ED in 80% of patients. This article reports a sequential approach for the diagnosis of ED that may diagnose reversible causes of ED and also unmask medical conditions that manifest with ED as the first symptom.

Increased levels of C-reactive protein after oral hormone replacement therapy may not be related to an increased inflammatory response

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women is associated with an increased inflammatory response that may trigger acute cardiovascular events. This suggestion is mainly based on the finding of elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels after HRT. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a broad spectrum of vascular inflammation markers in 389 postmenopausal women with increased cardiovascular risk at baseline and after either 6 months of HRT (126 women) or no HRT (263 women).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Compared with baseline, CRP levels significantly increased after HRT (0.9+/-0.2 versus 1.6+/-0.4 mg/L, P<0.01); on the contrary, soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 decreased from 208+/-57 to 168+/-37 ng/mL (P<0.01) after HRT. Similarly, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 decreased from 298+/-73 to 258+/-47 ng/mL (P<0.01), plasma E-selectin levels were reduced from 17.8+/-5.6 to 14.8+/-3.9 ng/mL (P<0.01), interleukin-6 levels decreased from 1.51+/-0.22 to 1.29+/-0.28 pg/mL, and s-thrombomodulin plasma levels decreased from 4.8+/-0.7 to 4.3+/-0.9 ng/mL (P<0.01). No significant changes in either CRP or vascular inflammatory marker were detected in women not taking HRT.

CONCLUSIONS

The discrepancy between increased plasma levels of CRP and reduced plasma levels of all other markers of inflammation suggests that the increased CRP levels after oral HRT may be related to metabolic hepatic activation and not to an acute-phase response. HRT seems to be associated with an overall decrease in vascular inflammation.

Lipid profiles and endothelial function with low-dose hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women at risk for coronary artery disease: a randomized trial

AIMS

To compare the effect of low (0.3 mg) and commonly prescribed (0.625 mg) doses of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) on brachial artery flow-mediated dilation and lipid profiles.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-five postmenopausal women (mean age, 65+/-6 years) at risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) (> or =2 established risk factors) entered a double-blind crossover study. Brachial artery endothelial function was evaluated by means of high-resolution vascular echography. Both CEE doses significantly decreased total cholesterol (-13%, 0.3 mg; -15%, 0.625 mg), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (-15%, 0.3 mg; -16%, 0.625 mg), and lipoprotein(a) (-28%, 0.3 mg; -39%, 0.625 mg) values from baseline levels. Both treatments increased high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (5%, 0.3 mg; 7%, 0.625 mg) and triglycerides (3%, 0.3 mg; 8%, 0.625 mg). There was no dose effect for changes in the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio (-21%, 0.3 mg; -23%, 0.625 mg). Both doses improved brachial artery dilation during reactive hyperemia by 63% over baseline.

CONCLUSION

In women at risk for CAD, low-dose hormone replacement treatment (HRT) improves lipid profiles and brachial artery endothelial function comparably to the most commonly prescribed dose. The benefit:risk ratio of low-dose HRT provides an attractive option for postmenopausal women at risk for CAD.

Dydrogesterone does not reverse the effects of estradiol on endothelium-dependant vasodilation in postmenopausal women: a randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in the brachial artery and the plasma levels of endothelin-1 in postmenopausal women at risk for coronary artery disease before and after treatment with both estradiol and estradiol plus dydrogesterone.

METHODS

Sixteen postmenopausal women (PMW) (mean age 58+/-9 years) with more than two risk factors for coronary artery disease, were randomized to receive either oral estradiol (2 mg) for 28 days or oral estradiol (2 mg) for 14 days and oral estradiol (2 mg) and dydrogesterone (10 mg) for 14 days, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, single cross-over study. Patients were crossed-over the complementary treatment 7 days after completing the first treatment. The study of forearm blood flow and the measurement of plasma endothelin-1 levels was carried out before and after each treatment.

RESULTS

Estradiol significantly increased FMD as compared to baseline; the addition of dydrogesterone did not affect the effect of estradiol on FMD. Similarly reactive hyperemic flow increased after estradiol alone or in association with dydrogesterone compared to baseline. Plasma levels of endothelin-1 were significantly reduced by estradiol both when administered alone or in association with dydrogesterone.

CONCLUSIONS

Hormone replacement therapy with estradiol and dydrogesterone improves endothelial function and reduces plasma levels of endothelin-1 in PMW at risk for coronary artery disease.

Effect of atorvastatin on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in postmenopausal women with average serum cholesterol levels

After menopause, most healthy women show an impairment of peripheral vasodilation and an increase of plasma cholesterol levels. Statins have been shown to improve endothelial function in hypercholesterolemic men and women. The present study tests whether atorvastatin (10 mg) influences endothelium-dependent vasodilation in postmenopausal normocholesterolemic women. Twenty-eight healthy, postmenopausal women (mean age 51 +/- 2 years) with serum total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol within the desirable range entered a double-blind, single-crossover study. Postmenopausal women were randomized to receive either atorvastatin (10 mg/day) or placebo for 10 days and then crossed to the complementary treatment. Endothelium-dependent and -independent responses were assessed by means of strain-gauge plethysmography before and after intra-arterial infusion of acethylcholine (ACh) and sodium nitroprusside, in comparison to physiologic saline. The nitric oxide pathway was evaluated by repeating the infusion of ACh during admininstration of L-arginine and (G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA). Serum lipoproteins were not significantly modified by the active treatment. The vasodilation induced by ACh was significantly higher in the atorvastatin-treated women compared with the placebo-treated group (24 +/- 3 vs 13 +/- 2 ml/100 ml tissue/min, p <0.01). In contrast, responses to the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside were not significantly modified by atorvastatin. The ACh-stimulated vasodilation induced by atorvastatin was additionally potentiated by L-arginine (800 +/- 105% vs 370 +/- 60%, p <0.05) and blunted by L-NMMA. No correlation was found between changes in plasma cholesterol and improvement in forearm blood flow. Our data show that the beneficial effect of atorvastatin on endothelium-dependent vasodilation is independent from changes in the lipid profile.

Postmenopausal women and cardiovascular risk: impact of hormone replacement therapy

The increased life expectancy of women living in industrialized countries is associated with an increase in diseases dependent or facilitated by a state of estrogen deficiency, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Several studies have shown that estrogen replacement therapy reduces the occurrence of coronary and, perhaps, of cerebrovascular disease by nearly 50% in treated women compared with nonusers. These findings are supported by the evidence that estrogens have a beneficial effect on cholesterol metabolism and deposition, with contribution to the inhibition of atherosclerotic plaque formation in arterial walls and a direct effect on the vessel wall. In some cases, progestins may counteract the beneficial effect of estrogens on cardiovascular functions. More androgenic progestins may have a detrimental effect on vascular reactivity, whereas less androgenic progestins do not seem to reduce the beneficial effect of estrogens. Case-control and cohort studies have shown that estrogen progestin therapy is associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. The HERS study has added critical data about the cardioprotective effect of hormone replacement therapy in elderly women with proven coronary artery disease. However, HERS results are not applicable to the population of women commonly prescribed hormone replacement therapy, because the data have been gathered in a population of patients infrequently prescribed with this therapy. Large-scale, randomized studies are evaluating the effect of estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement therapy on cardiovascular events in less compromised menopausal women. Until completion of these studies, hormone replacement therapy in women with increased cardiovascular risk should be viewed with neither enthusiasm nor fear.