Hepatic steatosis in hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection: does it correlate with body mass index, fibrosis, and HCV risk factors?

Hepatic steatosis is a recognized feature of hepatitis C viral infection, particularly in genotype 3. The demographics and the associations contributing to moderate to severe steatosis in genotype 3 are not very well studied. The aim of this study is to determine the demographics and association of steatosis with fibrosis, obesity, diabetes, lipid levels, and risk factors among patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3. Two hundred ninety-three consecutive HCV patients (genotype 1, n = 218; genotype 2, n = 43; genotype 3, n = 32) at our institution were studied retrospectively. Demographic information such as height, weight, genotype, risk factors, serum cholesterol and triglyceride, and liver biopsy was collected. Steatosis was graded using the Brunt classification. HCV genotype 3-infected patients were younger (P < 0.04) and had lower serum cholesterol levels (P < 0.02) compared to nongenotype 3 patients. Moderate to severe steatosis was more prevalent in HCV genotype 3 patients (P < 0.001) with intravenous drug abuse as a risk factor (P = 0.04). Genotype 3 was the independent predictor of steatosis in all patients. There was no statistical association between grade of steatosis and body mass index, fibrosis, necroinflammation, or hyperlipidemia when only HCV genotype 3 patients were included in the multivariate logistic model. Hepatic steatosis is a feature of genotype 3. Patients with HCV genotype 3 are younger and have lower serum cholesterol levels. Genotype 3 is the independent predictor for steatosis in HCV patients. HCV genotype 3 patients with moderate to severe steatosis are more likely to have intravenous drug use as a risk factor.

Hepatitis C virus recurrence in living donor liver transplant recipients

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation (LT) is a universal phenomenon. Recent reports have suggested an earlier and more aggressive recurrence in the living donor liver transplant (LDLT) population. The aim of this study was to compare the histological recurrence of HCV after LDLT versus deceased donor transplantation (DDT). Twenty-nine patients underwent LT for HCV-related end-stage liver disease at our institution between April 2001 and March 2003 (42 months). Twenty patients underwent DDT, and nine patients LDLT. Laboratory data were collected on a weekly to biweekly basis and HCV PCR was performed before LT and 3-4 months and yearly post-LT. Liver biopsies were performed as needed and per institutional protocol at 7 days, at 4 months, and yearly thereafter. All biopsies were evaluated by a single pathologist and scored for rejection (Banff score) and chronic hepatitis (Ishak score system). The predominant genotype in the DDT and LDLT groups was genotype 1 (DDT = 70%, LDLT = 79%). HCV RNA titers pre-LT and 3-4 months after LT did not differ. The incidence of rejection was higher in the DDT group (P < 0.05). There was a trend toward improved Ishak stage and grade in the LDLT group at 4 and 12 months post-LT, however, this trend did not reach statistical significance. No histological difference in the recurrence or severity rate was observed at 4 or 12 months post-LT in the DDT group vs. the LDLT group.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the MELD impact

The new allocation policy of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) based on the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) gives candidates with stage T1 or stage T2 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) a priority MELD score beyond their degree of hepatic decompensation. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the new allocation policy on HCC candidates before and after the institution of MELD. The UNOS database was reviewed for all HCC candidates listed between July 1999 and July 2002. The candidates were grouped by two time periods, based on the date of implementation of new allocation policy of February 27, 2002. Pre-MELD candidates were listed for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) before February 27,2002, and post-MELD candidates were listed after February 27, 2002. Candidates were compared by incidence of DDLT, time to DDLT, and dropout rate from the waiting list because of clinical deterioration or death, and survival while waiting and after DDLT. Incidence rates calculated for pre-MELD and post-MELD periods were expressed in person years. During the study, 2,074 HCC candidates were listed for DDLT in the UNOS database. The DDLT incidence rate was 0.439 transplant/person years pre-MELD and 1.454 transplant/person years post-MELD (P < 0.001). The time to DDLT was 2.28 years pre-MELD and 0.69 years post-MELD (P < 0.001). The 5-month dropout rate was 16.5% pre-MELD and 8.5% post-MELD (P < 0.001). The 5-month waiting-list survival was 90.3% pre-MELD and 95.7% post-MELD (P < 0.001). The 5-month survival after DDLT was similar for both time periods. The new allocation policy has led to an increased incidence rate of DDLT in HCC candidates. Furthermore, the 5-month dropout rate has decreased significantly. In addition, 5-month survival while waiting has increased in the post-MELD period. Thus, the new MELD-based allocation policy has benefited HCC candidates.

The use of hepatitis C-infected grafts in liver transplantation

1. Liver grafts from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected deceased donors can be used safely in HCV-infected recipients. 2. Histological assessment of the graft before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is advised. 3. Recipients of these grafts should give consent accordingly. 4. The course of HCV disease after OLT parallels that in patients who received noninfected organs.

Controversies in the management of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation is universal. A significant percentage of these patients develop progressive graft injury and cirrhosis. Those factors that modulate disease progression in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus infection remain controversial and are poorly understood. Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation with either interferon or interferon and ribavirin has yielded only limited success. Regardless of this, treatment is instituted. Peginterferon is more effective than standard interferon for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the nontransplantation setting when used either alone or with ribavirin. The effectiveness of peginterferon, both with and without ribavirin in the posttransplantation setting, is currently being explored. In this review those factors thought to affect disease progression in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus will be discussed, strategies that have been used to treat recurrent hepatitis C virus will be reviewed, and the impact that peginterferon may have on hepatitis C virus infection in the pretransplantation and posttransplantation setting will be explored.

The use of virologically compromised organs in liver transplantation

The present organ donor crisis has led to accepted use of organs from donors infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). Although capable of transmitting disease, these grafts offer opportunities to expand the donor pool for certain populations. Anti-HBc positive grafts can be used if care is taken to provide prophylaxis. Good quality grafts from HCV+ donors may be used in recipients who are themselves HCV+ with good outcomes.

Detection of hepatitis C virus sequences in brain tissue obtained in recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Patients with chronic hepatitis C frequently report tiredness, easy fatigability, and depression. The aim of this study is to determine whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication could be found in brain tissue in patients with hepatitis C and depression. We report two patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation who also developed severe depression. One patient died of multiorgan failure and the other, septicemia caused by Staphylococcus aureussis. Both patients had evidence of severe hepatitis C recurrence with features of cholestatic fibrosing hepatitis. We were able to study samples of their central nervous system obtained at autopsy for evidence of HCV replication. The presence of HCV RNA-negative strand, which is the viral replicative form, was determined by strand-specific Tth-based reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Viral sequences were compared by means of single-strand conformation polymorphism and direct sequencing. HCV RNA-negative strands were found in subcortical white matter from one patient and cerebral cortex from the other patient. HCV RNA-negative strands amplified from brain tissue differed by several nucleotide substitutions from serum consensus sequences in the 5' untranslated region. These findings support the concept of HCV neuroinvasion, and we speculate that it may provide a biological substrate to neuropsychiatric disorders observed in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The exact lineage of cells permissive for HCV replication and the possible interaction between viral replication and cerebral function that may lead to depression remain to be elucidated.

Hepatitis C: magnitude of the problem

1. End-stage liver disease associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has become the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States. 2. Patients with end-stage liver disease caused by HCV may have such associated comorbidities as chronic alcoholism, steatosis, or coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus 1 or other hepatitis viruses. These comorbidities may accelerate disease progression. 3. As chronic hepatitis C progresses to cirrhosis, the risk for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma increases; this poses difficult management problems. 4. As patients who underwent transplantation for end-stage liver disease caused by HCV infection are followed up long term, it has become clear that patient and graft survival are decreased compared with HCV-negative patients or those with cholestatic liver disorders. 5. Risk factors associated with a worse outcome after transplantation include host, viral, donor, and posttransplantation factors. 6. Major challenges to be addressed in the future include delineation of the optimal antiviral therapy and how to handle the need to perform retransplantation on patients who develop graft dysfunction as a result of HCV recurrence.

Impact of anti-hepatitis Bc-positive grafts on the outcome of liver transplantation for HBV-related cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

The present scarcity of organ donors requires consideration of grafts from sources not previously used. Several studies have addressed the use of grafts from donors who have antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc+). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the use of anti-HBc+ grafts in patients transplanted for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis.

METHODS

Recipients of first hepatic transplants from donors with antibodies to HBV were identified retrospectively. All patients who had serology suggestive of active HBV and were negative for hepatitis C and D were included in the analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the actuarial recurrence-free survival on patients with graft survival longer than 1.5 months. The stepwise Cox regression model was used to identify independent predictors of HBV recurrence.

RESULTS

One thousand seven hundred seventeen first liver transplants were performed at the Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute from September 1, 1990, to December 31, 1999. HBV was the cause of cirrhosis in 112 patients (6.5%). Thirty-three patients had coexistent viral infection (23 HCV and 10 HDV). Fourteen donors (17.2%) were positive for HBV markers, with nine anti-HBc+ and with five both anti-HBc+ and anti-HB surface-positive; of these, 13 anti-HBc+ organ recipients had long-term survival. Nine (69.2%) of these cases were reinfected versus 20 (35.7%) in the group that received grafts from HBV- donors (P<0.05, Fisher's exact test). The mean time to reinfection was shorter in the anti-HBc+ group (2.9 yr vs. 6.4 yr, P<0.005). There were no statistical differences in graft or patient survival between the two groups. HBV prophylaxis with combined lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) significantly reduced the reinfection rate (P<0.03). Hepatitis Be (Hbe) antigen-positive recipients trended to faster reinfection (not significant). Cox regression analysis revealed that both anti-HBc graft donor status (RR, 2.796; P=0.020) and combination of lamivudine/HBIG (RR, 0.249; P=0.021) are independently associated with reinfection.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of anti-HBc+ liver grafts does not affect graft or patient survival. However, patients who receive these organs are 2.5 times more likely to develop HBV recurrence. Lamivudine and HBIG combination decreases HBV recurrence 4-fold.

A concise update on the status of liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus: the challenges in 2002

Significant improvements in both patient and graft survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver failure have been made during the last decade. Recurrence of HBV infection has decreased, even in high-risk patients. Despite ongoing progress, challenges remain for the next millennium, including the determination of cost-effective dosing strategies, treatment of HBV infection in liver transplant recipients, and ramifications of the use of new antiviral agents, specifically, the appearance of resistant strains. This review summarizes the relevant history of OLT for chronic viral hepatitis B, details accepted preventive and therapeutic treatments, and discusses ongoing experimental trials. Emphasis also is placed on new approaches in transplantation as they impact on the care of HBV-infected patients.

Clinical significance of elevated alpha-fetoprotein in adults and children

The aim of the current study is to identify underlying pathology associated with elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP; >20 ng/ml) among patients referred to a tertiary-care academic medical center with emphasis in liver diseases, hepatobiliary surgery, and liver transplantation. From May 1992 to April 1997, 386 patients (320 adults and 66 children) with elevated AFP (>20 ng/ml) were identified from the Medical Archival System (MARS) database at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. The medical records from all these patients were retrospectively reviewed. Radiological, pathological, and biochemical profiles were obtained at the time of documented elevated AFP. These patients included: 218 adults with malignancies, 102 adults without malignancies, 18 children and infants with malignancies, and 48 children and infants without malignancies. Thirty-two percent of adults were found to have raised AFP with liver disease and without hepatocellular carcinoma and 78% had some type of malignancy, predominantly hepatocellular carcinoma. Seventy-three percent of infants and children had elevated AFP without malignancy. Based on our findings, we recommend that all patients (adults, infants and children) with raised AFP of >20 ng/ml should undergo thorough evaluation to rule out malignant disease.

Clinical and virologic outcomes of hepatitis B and C viral coinfection after liver transplantation: effect of viral hepatitis D

Hepatitis B (HBV) and C viral (HCV) dual-infection-associated liver disease is an uncommon indication for liver transplantation. The clinical and virologic outcomes in such patients have not been well studied. We retrospectively studied 13 patients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to HCV positivity who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and survived at least 30 days post-OLT. Antibody to hepatitis delta virus (HDV) was negative in 8 patients (group I) and positive in 5 patients (group II). Eleven of the 13 patients received standard hepatitis B immune prophylaxis, and they all remained HBsAg negative. All group I patients were HCV RNA positive after transplantation; in contrast, all group II patients were HCV RNA negative. Serum alanine aminotransferase levels were elevated in 88% (7 of 8) of the patients in group I compared with 20% (1 of 5 patients) in group II. None of the patients had graft loss from chronic rejection or recurrent hepatitis. Three patients had unsuspected hepatocellular carcinoma in the explant. We conclude that among liver transplant recipients with HBV and HCV coinfection, HDV infection is associated with the suppression of HCV replication and mild inflammatory activity after OLT.

Outcome of liver transplantation in hepatitis C virus-infected patients who received hepatitis C virus-infected grafts

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The present organ shortage has brought into question the suitability of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive grafts. This study reviewed the outcome of such transplantations in our institution.

METHODS

Twenty-three HCV-positive patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for end-stage liver disease with HCV-positive grafts in 1992-1995 were studied. Only patients who survived more than 30 days were included in the analysis. Control group included 169 patients who underwent transplantation for HCV-related cirrhosis and received HCV-negative organs.

RESULTS

Patients who received HCV-infected organs had a cumulative survival rate of 89% and 72% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, vs. 88% and 73% for the control group (NS). There was no difference in graft survival, incidence of cirrhosis, mean hepatitis activity index score, fibrosis, or mean activity of serum transaminases. There was a trend toward lower incidence of recurrent hepatitis C in the study group compared with control (21% vs. 23% at 1 year and 47% vs. 64% at 5 years; NS). Patients in whom the donor strain became predominant after transplantation had significantly longer disease-free survival than patients who retained their own HCV strain (P < 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

HCV-infected livers transplanted into HCV-infected recipients do not appear to convey a worse outcome in the initial years after OLT than HCV-negative grafts.

Liver transplantation for variceal hemorrhage

Orthotopic liver transplantation should be considered as a treatment for end-stage liver disease, which provides resolution to all its complications, including portal hypertensive-related bleeding. In the 1990s, variceal bleeding should be controlled primarily with endoscopy and, if this approach fails, with selective surgical shunting in those patients who have good hepatic function and with TIPS in those patients whose hepatic function is marginal and need bridging treatment until transplantation. Decompression of the portal system with either of these approaches allows for liver transplantation with challenges that can be overcome by experienced surgical teams.

Management of portal hypertension-related bleeding

Although endoscopic sclerotherapy and TIPS remain the primary therapeutic tools in management of acute variceal bleeding, surgical shunts must be considered for low-risk patients with bleeding. OLTx is the only definitive treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and vascular decompensation. Furthermore, the current prospective multicenter randomized study, funded by the National Institutes of Health and Human Services, will help determine the role of DSRS versus TIPS in cirrhotic patients with good hepatic reserve. This is a necessity in a time in which organ shortages are ever-increasing because of a growing disparity between the number of patients listed for transplantation each year versus the number of suitable organ donors. The various surgical techniques should be applied in different situations based on patients' clinical status at the time of the bleed and whether they are considered candidates for liver transplantation.

Detection of hepatitis C virus replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells after orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) remains controversial. We determined the presence of the negative HCV RNA strand in PBMCs from a group of HCV-positive patients before and after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Nine patients receiving orthotopic liver transplantation for end-stage HCV-related liver disease were studied. PBMCs were collected on the day of transplantation and 1 month later. The negative HCV RNA strand was detected by highly strand-specific Tth-based reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

All nine patients were positive for the presence of the HCV RNA-positive strand in serum and PBMCs both before and after transplantation. The presence of the negative HCV RNA strand was documented in three PBMC samples after transplantation but in none of the samples collected before transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that under circumstances of impaired immunity associated with pharmacological immunosuppression, HCV may be lymphotropic in vivo.

The influence of hepatitis C virus genotypes on the outcome of liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to report the influence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and HLA matches on the outcome of liver transplantation, hepatitis recurrence, and progression to cirrhosis after transplantation.

METHODS

HCV genotypes were determined from pretransplantation sera and/or liver explant tissues from 202 patients with HCV-related end-stage liver disease. One hundred fifty patients with known infecting genotype for whom posttransplantation biopsy specimens were available or who had normal results of liver injury tests constituted the group analyzed. Patients were followed up for up to 4.5 years. Hepatitis activity index scores at the time of disease recurrence were used to assess disease activity. Cirrhosis was diagnosed by using histological evidence. The number of HLA matches with respect to A, B, DR, and DQ loci was determined.

RESULTS

The rates of hepatitis recurrence were 25% and 75% at 1 year and 4 years, respectively; Kaplan-Meier survival analysis did not reveal significant differences between the infecting genotypes with respect to overall rates of survival or recurrence of hepatitis. At hepatitis recurrence, hepatitis activity index scores did not differ between the genotype groups. The distribution of infecting genotypes among the 7 patients who developed cirrhosis is reflective of pretransplantation distribution. Neither HLA site-specific nor total matches affected the rates of survival or disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The infecting HCV genotype had no influence on the incidence or severity of recurrent hepatitis, rate of survival, or development of cirrhosis. HLA matching does not influence transplantation outcome for HCV-related disease.

Hepatitis G virus coinfection in hepatitis C virus-infected liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

In this study, we determined the prevalence of hepatitis G virus (HGV) infection in end-stage hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease and examined the influence of HGV coinfection on the outcome of liver transplantation.

METHODS

HGV was detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and Southern blotting in sera drawn from 159 patients who were known to be HCV infected before transplantation. Patients were followed up for a mean of 28.4 months after transplantation.

RESULTS

Forty-one (25.3%) patients were HGV positive and the prevalence of HGV infection was similar for different HCV genotypes. Both HGV-positive and -negative groups had similar survival, recurrence rates, inflammatory activity scores, and degree of fibrosis at the time of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Infection with HGV is common in end-stage HCV-infected patients presenting for liver transplantation. It influences neither the outcome of liver transplantation nor the recurrence of hepatitis in the graft.

Distribution of infecting hepatitis C virus genotypes in end-stage liver disease patients at a large American transplantation center

The distribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes was studied in 202 anti-HCV-positive liver transplant candidates with end-stage liver disease. HCV sequences were successfully amplified from 185 patients: In the first 100, the genotype was determined by direct sequencing in the NS5 region, and in the remaining 85, type-specific primers were used for genotyping. Eighty-five patients (46.0%) were infected with type 1a HCV strains, 52 (28.1%) with type 1b, 14 (7.6%) with type 2b, 13 (7.0%) with type 4, 5 (2.7%) with type 3a, 2 (1.1%) with type 2a, and 1 (0.5%) with type 2c. Thirteen HCV-positive patients (7.0%) could not be genotyped. The relatively low prevalence of genotype 1b in this population of end-stage liver disease patients speaks against postulated higher pathogenicity of this genotype.

Antitumor effects of interleukin-2 and mismatched double-stranded RNA, individually and in combination, against a human malignant melanoma xenograft

The antitumor effects of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) and mismatched double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) were assessed in tissue culture and in a nude mouse model. Mismatched dsRNA did not show a direct antiproliferative effect against the human malignant melanoma cell line, BRO, in tissue culture. However, treatment of the BRO cells with up to 1000 units/ml rIL-2 in culture showed a slight increase in growth rate. Combined rIL-2/mismatched dsRNA treatment also demonstrated a similar slight enhancement of growth. Nude mice bearing subcutaneous tumors were treated by intraperitoneal injection of low doses (5000-20,000 units) of rIL-2 and mismatched dsRNA (500 micrograms). The in vivo tumor growth was significantly inhibited by the combined treatments (P less than 0.05) and survival was significantly increased (P less than 0.05). Measurement of cytotoxicity using splenocytes from treated animals showed significant augmentation of lytic activity against natural killer (NK)-sensitive YAC-1 cells in all rIL-2/mismatched dsRNA treatment groups, compared to the individual treatments or controls (P less than 0.05). Cytotoxicity of the splenocytes against the NK-resistant BRO cells was also augmented in animals treated with mismatched dsRNA and the highest rIL-2 dose utilized here (P less than 0.01). Renal, liver, and hematological toxicity was evaluated by measurement of blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, serum asparrtate aminotransferase, and a complete blood count with differential. There were no significant differences in these parameters in any of the treatment groups. Similarly, no differences in weight of the animals was seen in any treatment group. These results indicate that the combination of low-dose rIL-2 and mismatched dsRNA can potentiate host-mediated antitumor effects, yielding increased survival, without significant toxicity.