Once-per-week selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus twice-per-week bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma (BOSTON): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Selinexor combined with dexamethasone has shown activity in patients with heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma. In a phase 1b/2 study, the combination of oral selinexor with bortezomib (a proteasome inhibitor) and dexamethasone induced high response rates with low rates of peripheral neuropathy, the main dose-limiting toxicity of bortezomib. We aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of weekly selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus standard bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma.

METHODS

This phase 3, randomised, open-label trial was done at 123 sites in 21 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older, who had multiple myeloma, and who had previously been treated with one to three lines of therapy, including proteasome inhibitors, were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive selinexor (100 mg once per week), bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 once per week), and dexamethasone (20 mg twice per week), or bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 twice per week for the first 24 weeks and once per week thereafter) and dexamethasone (20 mg four times per week for the first 24 weeks and twice per week thereafter). Randomisation was done using interactive response technology and stratified by previous proteasome inhibitor therapy, lines of treatment, and multiple myeloma stage. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in the safety population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03110562. The trial is ongoing, with 55 patients remaining on randomised therapy as of Feb 20, 2020.

FINDINGS

Of 457 patients screened for eligibility, 402 were randomly allocated-195 (49%) to the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 207 (51%) to the bortezomib and dexamethasone group-and the first dose of study medication was given between June 6, 2017, and Feb 5, 2019. Median follow-up durations were 13·2 months [IQR 6·2-19·8] for the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 16·5 months [9·4-19·8] for the bortezomib and dexamethasone group. Median progression-free survival was 13·93 months (95% CI 11·73-not evaluable) with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone and 9·46 months (8·11-10·78) with bortezomib and dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0·70 [95% CI 0·53-0·93], p=0·0075). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (77 [39%] of 195 patients in the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group vs 35 [17%] of 204 in the bortezomib and dexamethasone group), fatigue (26 [13%] vs two [1%]), anaemia (31 [16%] vs 20 [10%]), and pneumonia (22 [11%] vs 22 [11%]). Peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or above was less frequent with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (41 [21%] patients) than with bortezomib and dexamethasone (70 [34%] patients; odds ratio 0·50 [95% CI 0·32-0·79], p=0·0013). 47 (24%) patients in the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 62 (30%) in the bortezomib and dexamethasone group died.

INTERPRETATION

A once-per-week regimen of selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone is a novel, effective, and convenient treatment option for patients with multiple myeloma who have received one to three previous lines of therapy.

FUNDING

Karyopharm Therapeutics.

Carfilzomib-associated renal toxicity is common and unpredictable: a comprehensive analysis of 114 multiple myeloma patients

Carfilzomib (CFZ) is a non-reversible proteasome inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma (RRMM). Its use has been associated with cardiovascular toxicity but although recently a signal of clinically significant renal complications has also been identified, it is less extensively investigated. We analyzed data of 114 consecutive patients with RRMM who received CFZ-based regimens. Renal complications not related to MM progression were observed in 19 (17%) patients; thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) was seen in 6 (5%) patients, albuminuria >1 gr/day in 7 patients (6%) and at least grade 3 acute kidney injury (AKI) which could not be otherwise explained in 6 patients (5%). A total of 15 patients discontinued CFZ and dosing was reinitiated at a lower level in one patient with AKI. Albuminuria was associated with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in the renal biopsy (performed in a total of 6 patients). Renal complications during CFZ therapy are common, occur mostly early and are unpredictable. A potential effect of CFZ on the renal endothelium could be implicated in the pathogenesis of these complications and may also share common pathophysiology with cardiovascular effects of CFZ.

Characterization and clinical implications of peripheral arterial involvement in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis cardiomyopathy

Background

The sporadic form of transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is underdiagnosed but its prevalence is increasing due to the aging population. Given the poor prognosis of ATTR-CM understanding the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of the disease is imperative in order to improve strategies for early diagnosis and risk stratification and to develop new effective therapeutic options. ATTR-CM is associated with hypotension and there is preliminary experimental evidence of vascular involvement but its presence and clinical significance remains unknown.

Purpose

To characterize peripheral arterial involvement and explore its clinical role in ATTR-CM.

Methods

We consecutively recruited 28 previously untreated patients with newly diagnosed ATTR-CM and 34 elderly controls >70 years old, without ATTR-CM or heart failure. In both groups, flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and intima-media thickness (IMT) in the carotid arteries were measured by high-resolution ultrasonography as markers of peripheral vascular reactivity and of subclinical atherosclerosis, respectively. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) was measured as a marker of arterial stiffness. Aortic blood pressure (BP) and augmentation index (AI) using applanation tonometry were measured as markers of arterial wave reflections, peripheral arterial resistance and central hemodynamics. Echocardiography was performed in all ATTR patients. All cardiovascular (CV) measurements were performed before administration of any ATTR-specific therapy.

Results

ATTR patients were older and had lower prevalence of hypertension and male gender (p<0.05 for all) than the control group. Aortic and peripheral BP (p=0.016–0.088) and AI (p=0.003) were lower in ATTR patients. IMT in the common (cc) and internal carotid (ic) as well as in the carotid bulb (cb) were significantly higher in ATTR patients (p=0.001–0.042). After multivariable adjustment for traditional CV disease (CVD) risk factors, the ATTR group was independently associated with AI and IMT in cc, cb and ic (p<0.05 for all). In a subgroup of subjects with similar age between groups (n=13 and n=33 and 74.5±2.9 vs. 75.6±3.6 years, for ATTR vs. controls, respectively) differences in AI and cbIMT remained significant. Interestingly, AI was strongly and inversely associated with interventricular wall thickness (IVwt) in ATTR patients (spearman rho=−0.651, p=0.001). After adjustment for traditional CVD risk factors this association remained significant.

Conclusion

ATTR-CM is associated with lower aortic wave reflections, which correlate with more advanced structural cardiac disease, as assessed by IVwt. Further, ATTR-CM patients present accelerated subclinical carotid atherosclerosis as compared to elderly control subjects. These findings suggest that in ATTR-CM there is disease-specific peripheral vascular involvement in parallel to cardiac involvement. The clinical significance of these findings merits further investigation.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Response of an oncology unit in the midst of the COVID-19 outbreak

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused an emergency in health systems worldwide. Apart from its apparent morbidity and mortality, COVID-19 has also imposed unique challenges in the management of cancer patients. We report here measures taken by a major oncology Unit in Greece to continue operation of the department while ensuring safety of the patients and health care professionals. The efficacy of these measures could serve as guidance for Oncology departments in view of a second wave of COVID-19 cases.

Circulating Soluble Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor Levels Reflect Renal Function in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Bortezomib-Based Induction

(1) Background: Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of kidney disease in different disease settings. The aim of this study was to investigate a possible link between suPAR circulating levels and renal impairment (RI) in newly diagnosed patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma (NDMM) before and after frontline therapy with bortezomib-based regimens. (2) Methods: We studied 47 NDMM patients (57% males, median age 69.5 years) before the administration of anti-myeloma treatment and at best response to bortezomib-based therapy. suPAR was measured in the serum of all patients and of 24 healthy matched controls, using an immuno-enzymatic assay (ViroGates, Denmark). (3) Results: suPAR levels were elevated in NDMM patients at diagnosis compared to healthy individuals (p < 0.001). suPAR levels strongly correlated with disease stage (p-ANOVA < 0.001). suPAR levels both at diagnosis and at best response negatively correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values (p < 0.001). Interestingly, no significance changes in suPAR levels were observed at best response compared to baseline values (p = 0.31) among 18 responding patients with baseline eGFR < 50 mL/min/1.73 m². (4) Conclusions: SuPAR levels reflect renal function in NDMM patients treated with bortezomib-based induction. Responders may have elevated circulating suPAR levels, possibly reflecting persistent kidney damage, despite their renal response.

The Role of Low Dose Whole Body CT in the Detection of Progression of Patients with Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy, characterized by plasma cell bone marrow infiltration and end-organ involvement. Smoldering MM (SMM) is an intermediate clinical entity between MGUS and MM, with a risk of progression to symptomatic disease 10% per year. Bone disease is the most frequent symptom of MM, with ~90% of patients developing bone lesions throughout their disease course. Therefore, imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis and management. Whole-body low-dose CT (WBLDCT) is widely available and has been incorporated in the latest diagnostic criteria of the IMWG. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of WBLDCT in the early identification of lesions in patients with SMM who progress solely with bone disease. In total, 100 asymptomatic patients were consecutively assessed with WBLDCT from July 2013 until March 2020 at baseline, 1-year after diagnosis and every 1 year thereafter. Ten percent of patients were identified as progressors with this single imaging modality. This is the first study to evaluate prospectively patients with SMM at different time points to identify early bone lesions related to MM evolution. Serial WBLDCT studies can identify early myeloma evolution and optimize disease monitoring and therapeutic strategies.

Integrated safety profile of selinexor in multiple myeloma: experience from 437 patients enrolled in clinical trials

Selinexor is an oral, small molecule inhibitor of the nuclear export protein exportin 1 with demonstrated activity in hematologic and solid malignancies. Side effects associated with selinexor include nausea, vomiting, fatigue, diarrhea, decreased appetite, weight loss, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and hyponatremia. We reviewed 437 patients with multiple myeloma treated with selinexor and assessed the kinetics of adverse events and impact of supportive care measures. Selinexor reduced both platelets and neutrophils over the first cycle of treatment and reached a nadir between 28 and 42 days. Platelet transfusions and thrombopoietin receptor agonists were effective at treating thrombocytopenia, and granulocyte colony stimulating factors were effective at resolving neutropenia. The onset of gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea) was most common during the first 1-2 weeks of treatment. Nausea could be mitigated with 5-HT3 antagonists and either neurokinin 1 receptor antagonists, olanzapine, or cannbainoids. Loperamide and bismuth subsalicylate ameliorated diarrhea. The primary constitutional side effects of fatigue and decreased appetite could be managed with methylphenidate, megestrol, cannabinoids or olanzapine, respectively. Hyponatremia was highly responsive to sodium replacement. Selinexor has well-established adverse effects that mainly occur within the first 8 weeks of treatment, are reversible, and respond to supportive care.

Daratumumab-based therapy for patients with monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance

Treatment of the plasma cell clone in monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is necessary in order to reduce toxic immunoglobulin load to the kidneys and salvage renal function. There are limited data on the use of daratumumab in patients with MGRS. We summarize our experience with the use of daratumumab-based therapy in 25 MGRS patients, 12 of whom were previously untreated. The median follow-up of the cohort is 14 months. The best overall haematologic response in evaluable patients was complete response (CR) in five (22%), very good partial response (VGPR) in five (22%) and partial response (PR) in seven (30%) patients for an overall response rate of 74%. Two of five patients in CR and two patients with initially detectable clones, but non-measurable immunoglobulins, had undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) with next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) after therapy. Haematologic response rate for previously untreated patients was 83% vs. 69% for previously treated and for daratumumab combinations it was 91% vs. 64%, and with CR/VGPR 82% vs. 29%, compared to daratumumab monotherapy. At six months, 12/22 (55%) patients not on dialysis achieved a reduction of proteinuria >30%, of at least 0·5 g/24 h, without an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reduction. The toxicity was mild and predictable. In conclusion, daratumumab-based therapy is a new option for patients with MGRS.

Cholangiocarcinoma: investigations into pathway-targeted therapies

INTRODUCTION

Cholangiocarcinoma is a malignant disease of the biliary tract and accounts for 3% of all gastrointestinal tumors. Surgical intervention is currently the only potentially curative strategy for cholangiocarcinoma. For patients with unresectable, advanced or metastatic disease, the combination of gemcitabine with cisplatin is considered the standard treatment. However, currently available therapeutic options have only a marginal benefit, especially among patients with relapsed/refractory tumors.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed targeted agents under clinical evaluation for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. FGFR and IDH inhibitors are at the most advanced stage of clinical investigation. EGFR inhibitors have demonstrated contradictory results, whereas inhibition of other molecular pathways, including the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK, the MET, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and angiogenetic pathways, has shown minimal or null benefit.

EXPERT OPINION

Several targeted approaches are being investigated for advanced cholangiocarcinoma. However, randomized clinical trials are needed to define the optimal treatment regimen and address issues including the option of monotherapy or combination regimens, the optimal sequence of different treatments, ways to overcome resistance to targeted treatments, as well as determining the right time and tissue for assessing molecular signatures. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy hold promise for improving patient outcomes in the future.

Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Dexamethasone for Light-Chain Amyloidosis

PURPOSE

Oral melphalan and dexamethasone (MDex) were considered a standard of care in light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. In the past decade, bortezomib has been increasingly used in combination with alkylating agents and dexamethasone. We prospectively compared the efficacy and safety of MDex and MDex with the addition of bortezomib (BMDex).

METHODS

This was a phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. Patients were stratified according to cardiac stage. Patients with advanced cardiac stage (stage IIIb) amyloidosis were not eligible. The primary end point was hematologic response rate at 3 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01277016.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients, 53 in the BMDex and 56 in the MDex group, received ≥ 1 dose of therapy (from January 2011 to February 2016). Hematologic response rate at 3 months was higher in the BMDex arm (79% v 52%; P = .002). Higher rates of very good partial or complete response rates (64% v 39%; hazard ratio [HR], 2.47; 95% CI, 1.30 to 4.71) and improved overall survival, with a 2-fold decrease in mortality rate (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.90), were observed in the BMDex arm. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events (the most common being cytopenia, peripheral neuropathy, and heart failure) were more common in the BMDex arm, occurring in 20% versus 10% of cycles performed.

CONCLUSION

BMDex improved hematologic response rate and overall survival. To our knowledge, this is the first time a controlled study has demonstrated a survival advantage in AL amyloidosis. BMDex should be considered a new standard of care for AL amyloidosis.

Organ-specific manifestations of COVID-19 infection

Although COVID-19 presents primarily as a lower respiratory tract infection transmitted via air droplets, increasing data suggest multiorgan involvement in patients that are infected. This systemic involvement is postulated to be mainly related to the SARS-CoV-2 virus binding on angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors located on several different human cells. Lung involvement is the most common serious manifestation of the disease, ranging from asymptomatic disease or mild pneumonia, to severe disease associated with hypoxia, critical disease associated with shock, respiratory failure and multiorgan failure or death. Among patients with COVID-19, underlying cardiovascular comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes and especially cardiovascular disease, has been associated with adverse outcomes, whereas the emergence of cardiovascular complications, including myocardial injury, heart failure and arrhythmias, has been associated with poor survival. Gastrointestinal symptoms are also frequently encountered and may persist for several days. Haematological complications are frequent as well and have been associated with poor prognosis. Furthermore, recent studies have reported that over a third of infected patients develop a broad spectrum of neurological symptoms affecting the central nervous system, peripheral nervous system and skeletal muscles, including anosmia and ageusia. The skin, the kidneys, the liver, the endocrine organs and the eyes are also affected by the systemic COVID-19 disease. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of the organ-specific systemic manifestations of COVID-19.

The current role of BTK inhibitors in the treatment of Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

INTRODUCTION

Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare, indolent lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma characterized by heterogeneous clinical and genomic profile. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is central to the signaling pathways required for clonal WM cell survival, and BTK inhibitors currently have an imperative role in the treatment of WM.

AREAS COVERED

The central role of BTK in WM will be described, and the rationale behind the development of BTKi. Clinical trial data that led to the approval of ibrutinib (the first-in-class BTKi) will be reviewed. Despite its potency and safe toxicity profile, ibrutinib does not induce deep remissions, and responses are mutational-status dependent. The mechanisms that lead to resistance to this agent are being investigated. Ibrutinib treatment has to be continuous; consequently, patients face the effects of long-term toxicity. In that context, second-generation inhibitors are in clinical development with fewer off-target effects and an efficacy profile, which will be determined based on long-term follow-up data.

EXPERT OPINION

The optimal therapeutic approach for WM patients remains to be established. The question of whether a combinatory (or synergistic) regimen to overcome resistance and allow for a fixed treatment duration will allow for deep and durable response is being addressed in ongoing clinical trials.

Monitoring Plasma Cell Dyscrasias With Cell-free DNA Analysis

The analysis of cell-free tumor DNA (cfDNA) has emerged as a promising method to determine the evolving genomic landscape of the whole tumor compartment, mainly in solid malignancies. Plasma cell dyscrasias are characterized by complex and constantly changing genomic aberrations that are important in terms of prognosis, evaluation of the minimal residual disease, and response monitoring. In multiple myeloma, the detection of clonal immunoglobulin rearrangements and driver gene mutations in the cfDNA has shown high concordance rates with their identification in bone marrow-derived tumor DNA. In Waldenström macroglobulinemia, cfDNA can be a reliable alternative to bone marrow aspiration for determining the mutational status of the MYD88 and CXCR4 genes. Importantly, cfDNA can be representative of the whole bone marrow compartment and of extramedullary sites in contrast to the sampling of a single bone marrow site. However, standardization and validation of the techniques are necessary before integrating cfDNA in the clinical practice. Therefore, we encourage the conduction of clinical trials with novel cfDNA-based designs and the adoption of cfDNA-guided endpoints in order to precisely determine the role of cfDNA in the current management of plasma cell dyscrasias.

Clinical Utility of Selinexor/Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Current Evidence and Patient Selection

Multiple myeloma (MM) is one the most common hematological malignancies, and despite the survival prolongation offered by proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, the need for novel agents is prominent. Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral, selective inhibitor of exportin-1 (XPO1), a vital protein for the exportation of more than 200 tumor suppressor proteins from the nucleus. Both in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, selinexor-mediated inhibition of nucleus export seems to effectively lead to cancer cell death. Selinexor in combination with dexamethasone (Sd) received an accelerated FDA approval on July 2019 for heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) based on the promising results of the Phase II STORM trial. The preliminary results of the randomized Phase III BOSTON trial have shown a 47% increase in progression-free survival among PI-sensitive, RRMM patients who received selinexor with bortezomib-dexamethasone compared with bortezomib-dexamethasone alone. Several different selinexor-containing triplet regimens are currently being tested in the RRMM setting in an umbrella trial, and the preliminary results seem promising. Furthermore, the addition of selinexor in other anti-myeloma agents seems to overcome drug-acquired resistance in preclinical studies. The main toxicities of selinexor are gastrointestinal disorders and hematologic toxicities (mainly thrombocytopenia); however, they are manageable with proper supportive measures. In conclusion, selinexor is a new anti-myeloma drug that seems to be effective in patients who have no other therapeutic options, including patients who have received novel cellular therapies such as CAR-T cells. Its potential role earlier in the therapeutic algorithm of MM is currently under clinical investigation.

Involvement of small nerve fibres and autonomic nervous system in AL amyloidosis: comprehensive characteristics and clinical implications

Peripheral nerve involvement in immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is common, characterised by severe progressive mixed neuropathy with autonomic dysfunction but there is limited data on the implications and the characteristics of small nerve fibres dysfunction (SNFD). The aim of our prospective study was to evaluate SNFD and its clinical implications in newly diagnosed AL patients. Twenty-three consecutive patients (10 male, mean age 61.78 years) and 21 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (8 male, mean age 61.28 years) underwent clinical evaluation and standard nerve conduction studies (NCS), baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) test, quantitative sensory testing (QST) and skin biopsy at the lower leg for measuring the density of the nerve fibres innervating the epidermis (IENFD). Axonal degeneration of the large nerve fibres was revealed in 15 out of 23 patients while SNFD was indicated by QST and skin biopsy in 56% and 61% of the patients respectively. BRS index significantly correlated with the IENFD and the QST results while low IENFD was associated with significantly poorer survival. Our study provides new insights and also an initial evaluation of new tools for assessment of the involvement of autonomic and small nerve fibres in AL amyloidosis. These findings also appear to have prognostic implications.

Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Current Landscape and Future Applications With Immunotherapeutic Approaches

The basic principle that deeper therapeutic responses lead to better clinical outcomes in cancer has emerged technologies capable of detecting rare residual tumor cells. The need for ultra-sensitive approaches for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection is particularly evident in Multiple Myeloma (MM), where patients will ultimately relapse despite the achievement of complete remission, which is commonplace due to remarkable therapeutic advances. Consequently, current response criteria on MM have been amended based on MRD status and MRD negativity is now considered the most dominant prognostic factor and the most valuable indicator for a subsequent relapse. However, there are particular limitations and several aspects for MRD assessment that remain open. This review summarizes current data on MRD in the clinical management of MM, highlights open issues and discusses the challenges and the endless opportunities arising for both patients and clinicians. Furthermore, it focuses on the current status of MRD in clinical trials, its dynamics in addressing debatable aspects in the clinical handling and its potential role as the prevailing factor for future MRD-driven tailored therapies.

Weekly selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (SVd) versus twice weekly bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after one to three prior therapies: Initial results of the phase III BOSTON study

8501

Background: Selinexor is an oral, selective inhibitor of XPO1-mediated nuclear export, leading to the reactivation of tumor suppressor proteins. In a phase 1b/2 study, the combination of once weekly (QW) selinexor with bortezomib and dexamethasone (SVd) was well tolerated with anti-MM activity in patients (pts) with PI-sensitive and PI-refractory disease. While twice weekly (BIW) bortezomib in combination therapy is efficacious, prolonged use is limited due to peripheral neuropathy (PN, 50-60%). The BOSTON study was designed to determine if SVd improves progression free survival (PFS), overall response rates (ORR) and reduces the rate of PN vs Vd. Methods: BOSTON is a global, phase 3, randomized study of QW SVd vs BIW Vd after 1-3 prior anti-MM regimens. The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints include ORR, overall survival (OS) and PN (rates and EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 outcomes). Randomization is stratified by treatment with prior PI therapies, number of prior anti-MM regimens (1 vs > 1), and Revised International Staging System (R-ISS; Stage III vs I or II). Following confirmation of progressive disease, pts on Vd could cross over to either: 1) SVd for pts able to tolerate continued bortezomib or 2) selinexor and dexamethasone for pts with bortezomib intolerance. Results:402 pts were enrolled; 195 and 207 to SVd and Vd, respectively. Median age was 67 (range: 38-90). Most (59.6%) pts were > 65 years and 57.1% were male. R-ISS stage at the time of MM diagnosis was III for 18.5% of pts. Baseline characteristics were balanced across the 2 arms. SVd significantly prolonged PFS vs Vd (median 13.93 vs 9.46 months, HR = 0.70, P = 0.0066). SVd was associated with a significantly higher ORR (76.4% vs 62.3%, P = 0.0012). Median OS was not reached on SVd vs 25 months on Vd (P = 0.28). Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (grade ≥3) for SVd vs Vd were thrombocytopenia (35.9% vs 15.2%), fatigue (11.3% vs 0.5%) and nausea (7.7% vs 0%). Clinically important differences were reported on the motor, autonomic and sensory scales on CIPN20. PN rates (grade ≥2) were significantly lower with SVd vs Vd (21.0% vs 34.3%, P = 0.0013). Conclusions: BOSTON is the first phase 3 study to evaluate the clinical benefit of SVd for relapsed/refractory MM. The study met the primary endpoint: once weekly SVd significantly improved PFS and ORR compared to twice weekly Vd. Rates of PN were significantly reduced with numerically fewer deaths on SVd vs Vd. Full dataset will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03110562 .

Oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges, dilemmas and the psychosocial impact on cancer patients

COVID-19 has caused unprecedented societal turmoil, triggering a rapid, still ongoing, transformation of healthcare provision on a global level. In this new landscape, it is highly important to acknowledge the challenges this pandemic poses on the care of the particularly vulnerable cancer patients and the subsequent psychosocial impact on them. We have outlined our clinical experience in managing patients with gastrointestinal, hematological, gynaecological, dermatological, neurological, thyroid, lung and paediatric cancers in the COVID-19 era and have reviewed the emerging literature around barriers to care of oncology patients and how this crisis affects them. Moreover, evolving treatment strategies and novel ways of addressing the needs of oncology patients in the new context of the pandemic are discussed.